Nobody uses tags in the LP store.
Most items you can just throw more LP and ISK at rather than build tag shopping lists. Items you can't do that with aren't in the markets.

Oh contrar mi capiton, yes you do.

Why should i search you made the claim so back up your claim with a up to date study of the numbers

no proff gtfo

[quote=Piugattuk]
Nobody uses tags in the LP store.

Nobody uses tags in the LP store.
Most items you can just throw more LP and ISK at rather than build tag shopping lists. Items you can't do that with aren't in the markets.

Wow, really is it that difficult for you? You have been told exactly how to find the simple answers and incapable of summoning either the attention span or mental agility to do so you just pretend there is no proff?

x-ISK earn't from mission rewards per month
y-ISK earn't from NPC bounties per month

k = ratio between NPC bounties and mission rewards (easily calculable as there are only a small pool of missions)

x * k / y = % of bounty ISK made from high sec missions.

Its so simple I'm amazed I even bothered to write it out for you, the numbers are all out there.

Yes, you are correct. That 1 in 200,000 guys who puts 800 mill in Navy guns on his ship makes the difference. They are the corner stone of the EVE economy. They are the back bone of trillions.

Cal navy 425's.
34 available in Jita.
To fit a Rokh would run you just under a billion.

Why should i wast my time searching

No i asked you to back up your claim with up to date official study

Link the large N-studys you say you have that shows most the isk come from missions or is it just a random number you pulled out your @ss

all the carriers running noms in 0.0 av nothing to do with it am i right?

See were i type Link the large N-studys

No not realy

would just like to see your evidence to back up your claim

No, the reward would be balance by increasing the LP and adiing more / better items to the LP Store.

For example increase the lp payout to say 25 - 30k for a good mission, add more valuable items to the store for example multiple run bpc's for ships and other factions items.

How about a 5 run faction battleship bpc for say 1.5m LP?

So the reward will be as good as it is now.

All i asked for was a link to these number of studys you claim as back up

up to date and official i asumed would be common sence no point looking at a study from 2008 or one made by a random dude with no evidence to back up theyer number

if not random typed numbers will do

GǪthey are the perfect target for reductions in ISK injection since you can go a long way with very little. Their large numbers mean that even a small change can have a large effect, all without making the life miserable for them individually so no subs will be lost.

Fed Navy magstabs.
Caldari Navy Invuls.
Imperial Navy EANMs.
Republic Fleet warp disruptors.
... and many more.

Search for Kefira's GÇ£mission incomeGÇ¥ threads.

Search for Kefira's GÇ£mission incomeGÇ¥ threads.

Search for Kefira's GÇ£mission incomeGÇ¥ threads.

Search for Kefira's GÇ£mission incomeGÇ¥ threads.

Search for Kefira's GÇ£mission incomeGÇ¥ threads.

At some point you will have to either adapt or walk into the sunset with your shield on your back.

Blanket changes never have small effects.

sorry but must dismiss your argument as bull

But hey i ear random typed numbrrs are all the rage when validating a debate

Depends on what you mean by blanket changes and small effectsGǪ

But yes, that's kind of the point: the amount of missions being run and the amount of people running them (180k characters the last time I saw any number on it) means that you don't need much to have relatively large effects on the overall inflow of ISK. Shifting, say, 5% of the rewards from pure ISK into LP would mean roughly 15bn ISK less a day coming into the economy. Sure, the market will react and alter prices but on the face of it, that means a (near-)zero net change in income that reduces the daily net influx by 1.5%, and the pain for the individual mission-runner should be relatively minor. I can't think of any other faucet where the same kind of adjustment on the individual level would have anywhere near the same global effect.

Why should i

i didnt make the claim why should i search to validate someone els argument

But hey i ear random typed numbrrs are all the rage when validating a debate

Why should i

i didnt make the claim why should i search to validate someone els argument

But hey i ear random typed numbrrs are all the rage when validating a debate

And this is why people still think global warming isnt happening and evolution doesn't exist. Info has been provided, go look at it.

As long as every alliance gets a nice moon goo basket so they don't need to rely on tax to pay Sov, sure. When you talk macro fixing, it's the alliances that will see the impacts, not the alliance members.

bck on topic what data you want from me i didnt make any claims