Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 10:48:00 -
[331] - Quote
Nice try. Yet botting is a separate issue involving the report bot function. That is completely different.
IWin? Not if you aren't paying attention. In a game where loss is permanent I am not seriously going to walk out of the POS where my first indication of an enemy is him locking me down because I dont have some kind of fantasy instawarp fit,
You want free ganks. Just admit it. Because like many others we are tired of the excuses and run arounds to claim you "NEED local to go away"
No we are not going to put up some fantasy CAP. No we arent going to pay some alliance an ungodly fee to do such cap. We arent going to spam some D-scan like thing. We arent going to play minigames to see local.
We are going to leave. And I HIGHLY suspect we wont be the only ones. Especially once the pirates flood into nullsec and pounce upon the many who don't keep up with the news.
So ya you may have your fantasy world of gank after free tear filled gank. But then you will notice empty systems. Then slowed down dev as CCP loses customer after customer.
CCP you have shown willingness to listen. People in nullsec are taking a risk. The afk cloakers have no risk when AFK and the ones asking for local to delay want to remove almost all risk from their ganks.
Fix nullsec. Don't kill it! |
Louis deGuerre
Malevolence. Void Alliance
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 10:54:00 -
[332] - Quote
*smiles*
*dusts off Megathron*
MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!! FIRE FRIENDSHIP TORPEDOES ! |
ArmyOfMe
TEDDYBEARS. Aesir Empire
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 11:50:00 -
[333] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote: You want free ganks. Just admit it. Because like many others we are tired of the excuses and run arounds to claim you "NEED local to go away"
People in nullsec are taking a risk. The afk cloakers have no risk when AFK and the ones asking for local to delay want to remove almost all risk from their ganks.
Fix nullsec. Don't kill it!
Null sec is already dead.
Strange however that i dont see many of your corp members trying to do anything significant in 0,0 And no, im not after ganks. I do however want to be able to try and find a fight without an entire region knowing about me as soon as ive enterd local somwere. What you want to do with your carebear needs is of no interest to me, and never will be either. Eve is a cold hard place, and local the way it is, ruins a lot of that feel.
Out of pure curiosity, but how the hell does ppl in 0,0 really take any risks these days?? you have info channels, you have jump bridges, you have bubbles to slow gangs down and you have local. so no, you dont really have any risks, cause as soon as someone enters local you can warp away or log, wich is risk free. |
spawx
Reaver Technologies Broken Chains Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 11:58:00 -
[334] - Quote
... so no view for the Missile launchers? damn, all other guns got a 3d view and can be looked at on the ship, no love for caldari ? xD |
stellatron
Geese Jugglers SRS.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 12:39:00 -
[335] - Quote
Oh thank you gods of new eden for finally getting back on track to what really matters in eve. Spaceships!
/resub |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
329
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 12:44:00 -
[336] - Quote
spawx wrote:... so no view for the Missile launchers? damn, all other guns got a 3d view and can be looked at on the ship, no love for caldari ? xD Changing missile launchers is a pretty large undertaking since it requires redesigns of every ship that has a launcher slot, and a complete reworking of the missile graphics on top of coming up with designs for a whole slew of modules that have previously not had any kind of 3D representation. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |
Meditril
T.R.I.A.D
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 12:45:00 -
[337] - Quote
I am really looking forward to this ones...
- Factional warfare - Assault ships - New T2 modules - New EWAR-Drones - T2 Rigs manufacturing
Please tell me more! I feel that awesomeness will come near christmas! Don't let me starve from nescience. |
Crellion
Parental Control Merciless.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 13:15:00 -
[338] - Quote
Things must be really desperate if Zulu played the 'fix hubrids' card....
Yes I do reaise they can just say it proved too hard for this expansion and blah blah blah but still.... putting the intention on paper... scawwwwyyyy...
I bet they had to drop Nescafe Gold Blend for regular or some such deprivation at CCP HQ.
|
OT Smithers
Buccaneer's Den
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 13:56:00 -
[339] - Quote
spawx wrote:... so no view for the Missile launchers? damn, all other guns got a 3d view and can be looked at on the ship, no love for caldari ? xD
There is NEVER love for Caldari. |
icedisko
Rapalje Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:04:00 -
[340] - Quote
Why omg!! WHY no improvements in GRAPHICS!! (read special effects) More color on E-War, missiles, explosions, etc etc.
|
|
Becky Manson
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:13:00 -
[341] - Quote
A sincere "Thank You" CCP.
Good to see you guys are turning your attention to some things that's been needing your love. I believe I might just be resubbing my accounts this winter expansion.
Hilmar,
Thanks for your apology. Didn't think it would ever happen, my eyes got a little misty (not really). EVE is awesome, it is a unique, one of a kind experience to anyone who plays the game. Again, thank you Hilmar.
Baby steps. |
Dr Karsun
Coffee Lovers Brewing Club Care Factor
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:15:00 -
[342] - Quote
I sure do hope all this is serious.
If not, I'm going to be really dissapointed. Yay for faction warfare changes! YAY for hybrid fix!
This may be a grand moment for eve. |
Ogogov
Ars ex Discordia Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:38:00 -
[343] - Quote
Hybrid weapons balancing -
\o/
It only took THREE YEARS. |
TheButcherPete
StoneWall Metals Productions Rebel Alliance of New Eden
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:43:00 -
[344] - Quote
Skill training completed: Gallente Battleship level 5
Now, to remedy the Oxytope prices |
Nalha Saldana
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:45:00 -
[345] - Quote
OT Smithers wrote:spawx wrote:... so no view for the Missile launchers? damn, all other guns got a 3d view and can be looked at on the ship, no love for caldari ? xD There is NEVER love for Caldari.
Just wait, the Ferox and Rokh will be awesome ;) |
Varlenchkya
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:51:00 -
[346] - Quote
Been playing EVE-ONLINE non-stop since 2006-02-03,
eve was here when a was single, when i started dating my future wife, the day before wedding I was playing eve :), it was there when i got my first baby ( i was willing to get up at night to check forthe baby, but in reality when i was trying to put him to sleep i Had in one arm my baby and in the other i was changing skill / trying other fiting for my brands new ships ) was there When i started my mexican restaurant, my second kid (he's 3 month)
started has pure gallente , attracted by the gallente ship description : close range brute force ! started to try pvp but at that time CCP started to nerf gallente ....
I started to skill for eos .BANG NERF went for myrmidon BANG another nerf at that time deimos, astarte had lot of dps but but was never on killmail because of blasters close range and lack of tracking then went for nano-ishtar ( back when nano-typhoon were king ) ...but BANG the first nano-nerf ! went for curse BANG no/nuke nerf then disgusted i said to myself '' ok ccp always nerf the ship I finish to skill so im going to skill for minmatar so the vagabond could be nerfed :) BANG second nano-nerf ! i was thinking of skill for falcon and but i skill other thing and BANG jam nerf :) but this time i diidnt loose skill time :) so i decided to got for drake so i could be nerfed BUT NO CCP doesnt do anything ! all we see his big blob of drake or vagabond / cyna, minmatar ship
dont forget that I've lost o lot of skilltime !!!
And now if we see a gallente ship on KB its because its dead the guys thought that deimos/ astarte / ishtar going to be helpful but only to get on kb faster in the victim section !
If eve player want to solo pvp just go minmatar BUT dont use gallente because CCP hate them! Until maybe now ( hybrid weapon balancing) ....
CCP plz im so sick of the passive shield tanking everyone his using the same fit ! LSE , invul
Been 2 year that i dont use my active armor skills and 3-4 that i dont use galente for pvp . i use thanatos to make isk :(
bring back active armor tanking
just read the HELLMAR letter :
before puting new ship why dont you guy's let us play with ALL the ship that we have now buff gallente ceptor, gallente has, battelcruiser ....we need variet |
Anatole Papadopoulos
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:59:00 -
[347] - Quote
Ship Balancing ... why is it everyone seems to think that GÇÿapproximately equivalentGÇÖ is good? WhatGÇÖs wrong with distinctly different fighting styles? If one race is supposed to have (for example) a speed bonus on all ships then give them an AWESOME speed bonus. Granted, each of the other races needs an awesome bonus that can counter-punch GÇô but every race doesnGÇÖt need an awesome counter-punch bonus for ALL of the other races. WhatGÇÖs wrong with the concept that if you fly a race-x ship you NEVER want to go up against a race-y ship because youGÇÖll get beaten every time? In my opinion, racial ship types should be so distinct that you instantly know what their greatest strength is regardless of their fit or class. |
Elrianmk2
Dead Space Alpha Shadow of xXDEATHXx
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:01:00 -
[348] - Quote
White Tree wrote:Quote:Hybrid weapons balancing Your welcome, EVE Online community. (white tree for csm 7)
Win! Also, been a long time coming this, but good to see it. Got to be a bugger when real life rail-roads you a bit, glad that it was realised rather than the direction continued as it was, coming up 6 years of playing now and don't like anything else on the market currently. I know this cause I started looking recently. |
Kellath Eladrel
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:07:00 -
[349] - Quote
I started clapping IRL as I read through the list. |
kasai zenpachi
Seal Team Six
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:12:00 -
[350] - Quote
First to the CSM thank you for making our feelings known to ccp, you all did great.
and to ccp thank for finally listening it only to took a few years and a few kicks in the family jewels to get your attention but it seems to work.
|
|
Anshio Tamark
Avitus Lugus
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:16:00 -
[351] - Quote
Sounds good to me. I honestly didn't bother reading the hundreds of Forum-posts before this one, so I don't know what people have complained about (if they've complained, that is).
As for the topics listed in Zulu's devblog, the only one that I'm really interested in seeing done properly at the moment is the Assault Ships. I don't have a starbase, I don't use EWAR drones, I have and use the T2 gear I need, I have yet to see a capital ship, I don't participate in FW and I don't use Hybrids. Ergo, those aren't important to me.
As long as CCP doesn't nerf my Hawk, I'm satisfied. Then I couldn't care less about Hybrid guns and Capital ships... And if they nerf Hawks, I can't use that pile of Hawk BPC's I'm working on for anything...
(I wouldn't mind a 3D-model file for Launchers, though. All the guns have models, so why not add for launchers? There are only 8 types of launchers after all...) |
Usurpine
Galactic Defence Consortium United Pod Service
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:17:00 -
[352] - Quote
Good to see a refocus on meaningful content and fixing long time overdue stuff.
Its a start, keep on doing that and you make us happy. |
John Nucleus
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:22:00 -
[353] - Quote
Great stuff!
But,
Add "Energy Weapon Balacing" to the list please.
It makes me sad to fit Gatling Pulse Laser on my punisher in order to have enough PowerGrid for anything else. Medium Pulse Laser are so ridiculously costy. No wonder everyone takes Autocannon instead of lasers... |
Ho'Taru
Brony Excavations Inc
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:59:00 -
[354] - Quote
On the issue of local chat, one compromise/solution I can think of is to make being cut off from local an effect of cloaking. With the exception of covert ops cloak users (for which getting the jump on enemies is the whole point), my understanding is that other cloak users would give up too much in the way of being able to move/resync times to be able to seriously exploit not appearing in local. |
Eivy
Star Junction
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 16:16:00 -
[355] - Quote
Quote:ItGÇÿs time to get serious about these spaceships.
Arnar Hrafn Gylfason
Senior Producer of EVE Online
Your sudden seriousness may be coming a little to late, lets hope EVE On-a-thin-line will surprise us all.
But seriously, I've really enjoyed my time playing eve, I can say that eve was real to me at many times. And I have found some great friends in this huge community.
In this massive multiplayer online universe , I seek achievement and excitement. But I'm afraid my patience has grown thin as of late....I'm beginning to get withdrawal symptoms and my interests are sparking else where.
CCP, you have till the 20th December to seriously amaze me...
Goodluck |
Largo Coronet
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 16:17:00 -
[356] - Quote
Just to ask about one item on this list:
-->T2 Rigs manufacturing<--
Was there something wrong with it?
As for the rest, I will hold judgement until they are revealed. Sometimes your ideas of "balance" make me suspect you have inner ear trouble. |
Grimpak
Midnight Elites Echelon Rising
65
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 16:30:00 -
[357] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:ok how about taking the ship bonus for tracking 7.5% per lev and just make all rails/blasters have 37.5% better base tracking...
furthermore the replaced bonus would be a mass reduction per level... this would add to the replaced fall off bonus...
the concept for blaster i want to see is close range arties... where blasters get a slight base dps boost but get a massive alpha boost... with better base tracking and falloff... even with 50% more falloff you are not shooting that far... take gal from scram range to disrupter range...
plus you have to look at caldari here too and remember their ships are generallly slower then others (even with speed mods)... so you cant just make blasters ultra close range without making caldari fast too... but hell then why not undo the nano nerf? i say eve has evolved and so too should hybrids... blasters will still be balls to the walls omg damage but now they will actually be able to apply it...
I see your point but, I'm more partial to boosting damage by 50% (yes 50%), boosting tracking by... hmm no more than 20%, cut optimal and falloff further so that you can't even scratch paint at ranges above 10km.
this is for the guns only. for the ships, I would've rework them etirely so that they are more nimble than minmatar, but still not as fast. or faster than minmatar but only in a straight line.
your concept of close range arty isn't bad, but I prefer the concept of sawed-off shotguns shooting explosive pellets at ranges closer than point blank.
HOWEVER, it must be said that small hybrids DO NOT need any changes. the frigate-sized blaster platforms are already quite good in all their range, and the rail platforms are also very decent. [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |
Lex Avril
Integral Conceptions Inc. Integral Concepts Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 16:31:00 -
[358] - Quote
new captains quarters...
ah....
either I missed this spot in the linked video, or I'm surprised to the bones about those 'new' captain quarters, that cannot stand any comparing to throw away freebies in other games.
CCP.... really.... after the word of the CEO to release only what is ready I see now this video linked. |
nardaq
Orion Expeditions
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 16:51:00 -
[359] - Quote
I'd like to see a bug/fix round instead a expansion and focus (way more) on the client/server performance for once
here a topic from last year http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1425870 |
Distraf
Mars University
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 17:15:00 -
[360] - Quote
I think you guys should look in to moving the Eject button away from the Self Destruct button same as the access storage away from put offline on the POS arrays that are online. It gets kinda hairy when your Crew has been drinking a beer or 2. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |