Things like the Cyno effect and engine trails are obviously high on that list.

I don't agree entirely with your changes, BUT I like where your focus is. On the other hand, I also would like to see assault ships and hybrids get some love (personal bias, since I've invested however many SP on Gallente ships and weapons).

CCPers have said that a null-sec revamp is being worked on, will take some time, and no-doubt will include a proper roll for jump-bridges and capitals and supers and freighters. One would hope they'd tackle low-sec at the same time, not to add complexity but actually to reduce it.

Anyways, still in wait-and-see mode.

I think Rails just need some tinkering with their stats. Blasters however, are the tricky part, since their problems are partly born out of the platforms which use them (the ships I mean). I am kinda convinced, that it's not a good idea to be a mainly armor-race with close-ranged weaponry as the mainstay of damage-dealing. FIxing could include:
-Redoing active armor tanking to work similar to passive shield tanking aka constant replenishment of HP instead of x amount every cycle, so the repping kicks in the very moment the damage is there and not when the mod cycled. This way active armor tanking is more viable, so Gallente could profit more from their bonuses and slot-layouts without having to suffer as much because of the superiority off Buffers in larger fleet engagements (not a magic solution though, of course, but it helps with the scaling imo and this not only on Gall-boats) - active tanking needs a redo anyways
-Tinkering with agility and speed of the Gallente blaster-platforms, so they actually can charge into melee like the knights they are designed to be
-Tinkering with tracking, optimal, damage output and falloff of the Blaster-turrets (your mileage may vary on parts of that, depending on what school of thought you come from - personally I prefer more agile Gallente-ships with a boost to damage output or appliance ratio at current ranges)
-...

There are numerous ways and I am curious what way CCP will go.

Your welcome, EVE Online community.

(white tree for csm 7)

Hybrid weapons balancing - don't give a damm

Factional warfare - double don't give a damm

Assault ships - huh?

Capital ship balancing - don't give a damm

New T2 modules - huh?

Starbase logistics management - don't give a damm

New EWAR-Drones - huh?

T2 Rigs manufacturing - don't give a damm

Ship spinning - so...

New font - nice

More captains quarters - eventually

Time dilation - don't give a damm

Sensible, lower NEx prices - never coming

New solo content - never coming

Capital ships for solo players - never coming

Endgame content for "casual" players - never coming

Interactable NPCs for Incarna - never coming

"Socializing" for Incarna - never coming


Am i making myself clear on what do i think that i may get from giving to this company 340 euros a year?

CCP have made it quite clear for a long time they consider the nullsec blobwars to be "endgame" content, and looking at how safe/dumbed down highsec is - combined with how CCP want to "force/lure" players into corporations (extra bonus for making big coaltions easily control vast space).. it's quite clear CCP envision EVE to be a nullsec blob game. Everything else is irrelevant.

Cool.
Minmatar: Best for PVP
Caldari: Best for PVE
Galente: Hybrids boost
Amarr: *WHERE'S OURS?*

I think Amarr is being left behind in the dust. My suggestion, create crystals that can deal kinetic and explosive damage as well. A particle beam would fire particles, which should create kinetic damage (could deal out high amounts of EM, some amount of Kinetic, and a little amount of thermic). A highly concentrated beam should be able to combust materials on the target ship, creating explosive damage (so this crystal could deal out Therm/Exp). Just my opinion on things, because Amarr is too limited on what types of targets it can shoot against.

I would also appreciate a slight boost to Energized Adaptive Nano Membranes, anywhere between +5-10% boost to the resists (instead of 20% to all resists the T2 offers, it could offer from 25-30% resists) to counter that of the popular Invulnerability Field (which the T2 version offers 30% and the Navy version offers 37.5% compared to the Amrr Navy EANM of a much smaller 22.5%).
This armor boost would affect more than just Amarr, but Galente and Minmatar that use armor as well to rival the popular shield tank.

There are alot of items promised in this blog.

Let's see how many make it to patch notes.

he also seems more interested in solo'ing EVE, a massive multiplayer online role-playing game.

granted that having more solo content is nice, but this is a game in where you're supposed to cooperate with other players.


so yes, miss Ishtanchuk Fazmarai, you should've never left X3 - Reunion. Why don't you go back if you don't like playing EVE at all?