| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 29 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8209
   |
Posted - 2013.03.18 09:30:00 -
[601] - Quote
I said I picked a side.
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Anunzi
High House Of Shadows
Tribal Band
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 11:18:00 -
[602] - Quote
A vote for Malcanis is a vote for Bacon then 
Also, your thread seems to have derailed in to topic about booze and bacon. Not a bad thing!
Malcanis for CSM8, Its about damn time. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8209
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:01:00 -
[603] - Quote
Well all the directly EVE related topics seem to have been covered, so now I can address issues relevant to EVE players.
I hereby declare Malc's cocktail bar and obscene limerick emprioum open!
There was a young lady of Venus
Who asked to see the barman's dog, Enis
He said "Mind you don't trip"
And mixed her a Brandy Egg Flip
That inquisitive young lady of Venus!
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Temba Ronin
205
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 11:37:00 -
[604] - Quote
Malcanis for CSM ..... Seems like an idea that will benefit players ..... I can endorse this man because he has the patience and the knowledge to make the game more playable for both new and veteran players.
VOTE MALCANIS for CSM8
Power to the Players! |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8215
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 11:50:00 -
[605] - Quote
Thanks Temba, I remember our conversation within and around the "Hisec manifesto" thread and I'm glad you kept playing.
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
242
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 09:51:00 -
[606] - Quote
Combining whisky and bacon is also something that should be done.
(I am glad that you know what good drinks are, and I agree that tequila is only useful for clearing out plumbing.)
|
Naughty Ferret
Star Frontiers
THORN Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 21:23:00 -
[607] - Quote
I vote bacon therefore I vote Malcanis |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8242
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 18:53:00 -
[608] - Quote
Confirming that CCP have accepted my candidacy apllication.
Much thanks to you all for your support so far.
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Kytayn
Explora Empire
Darkspawn.
142
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:02:00 -
[609] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Malcanis wrote:Anunzi wrote:Single malt, Double or Bourbon? I've only had a few bourbons that aren't Jack Daniels. Sadly whiskey doesn't agree with me these days (I can drink one glass and get away with it, but who the hell can only drink one glass?), but back in my proper whisky drinking days, I liked a good peaty Islay like Lagavullein. And of course The Macallan, which is the whiskey a gentleman should drink. There's a lot to be said for Bushmills also. You've redeemed yourself in my eyes. Jack is ****, though. Gentleman Jack is quite good.
Gentleman Jack isn't bad, but you can have a bottle of The Glenlivet 12yo or a bottle of Johnnie Walker Black Label for the same price. The Glenlivet blows Gentleman Jack out of the cask.
related
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=212413&find=unread
Congrats on being official Malcanis. |
Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1390
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 22:37:00 -
[610] - Quote
Kytayn wrote:The Glenlivet blows Gentleman Jack out of the cask.
Confirming this. I was simply pointing out that Jack is **** but they can do better.
I support Malcanis and Psychotic Monk for CSM8. |
|
|
Anunzi
High House Of Shadows
Tribal Band
59
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 08:54:00 -
[611] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Confirming that CCP have accepted my candidacy apllication.
Much thanks to you all for your support so far.
Congratulations Mal, best of luck!
Malcanis for CSM8, Its about damn time.
A vote for Malcanis is a vot for bacon! |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8251
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 09:00:00 -
[612] - Quote
Anunzi wrote:Malcanis wrote:Confirming that CCP have accepted my candidacy apllication.
Much thanks to you all for your support so far. Congratulations Mal, best of luck!
Thanks Anunzi. I'll need it, I think.
I don't know whether I'm more nervous about the possibility of losing or the possibility of winning... 
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Anunzi
High House Of Shadows
Tribal Band
59
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 09:16:00 -
[613] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Anunzi wrote:Malcanis wrote:Confirming that CCP have accepted my candidacy apllication.
Much thanks to you all for your support so far. Congratulations Mal, best of luck! Thanks Anunzi. I'll need it, I think. I don't know whether I'm more nervous about the possibility of losing or the possibility of winning...
I can understand that. However, I have every confidence in your ability to see it through, win or lose.
I do think that you will get elected, you just have to look at this thread and the amount of people pledging their support to you via the well known medium of EvE-O forum signatures to see that you have a lot of support within this community.
Malcanis for CSM8, Its about damn time.
A vote for Malcanis is a vot for bacon! |
None ofthe Above
462
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 18:40:00 -
[614] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:I don't know whether I'm more nervous about the possibility of losing or the possibility of winning...
It is a pretty challenging position, good to see that you understand that.
Just wanted to drop by and note my support and thank you for all the contributions you've already made. Your ideas have made EVE a better game.
Like Hans, you've already had a big impact, perhaps even more so than Hans since he credits you for inspiring and informing a lot of his work. Hope to see more in the future, whatever the outcome of the election.
EVE is a sandbox; The only "end-game" content in EVE is the crap that makes you rage-quit.
Vote, you bastards!
CSM 8 Endorsements: Malcanis, Mike Azaria, Psychotic Monk, Trebor Daehdoow, Ripard Teg |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8278
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 19:04:00 -
[615] - Quote
None ofthe Above wrote:Malcanis wrote:I don't know whether I'm more nervous about the possibility of losing or the possibility of winning... It is a pretty challenging position, good to see that you understand that. Just wanted to drop by and note my support and thank you for all the contributions you've already made. Your ideas have made EVE a better game. Like Hans, you've already had a big impact, perhaps even more so than Hans since he credits you for inspiring and informing a lot of his work. Hope to see more in the future, whatever the outcome of the election.
Hans doesn't owe me anything. Ideas are cheap; hard work is what counts.
If I get elected you'll probably see very little of my ~ideas~ enacted, but I hope that I'll be able to work effectively to deliver what's good for EVE.
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Xander Phoena
Zebra Corp
Gentlemen's Agreement
114
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:52:00 -
[616] - Quote
I interviewed Malcanis as part of the Crossing Zebras CSM8 Election Interviews. You can check it out here:
http://c-z.me/csm8malcanis
www.crossingzebras.com |
Dibblerette
The Phantom Regiment
THE ROYAL NAVY
144
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 06:55:00 -
[617] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Dibblerette wrote:@Malcanis
Glad to see your platform is as sensible as your posting. My only question is what would you do to try and improve lowsec (specifically non-FW, CCP seems to forget about us) beyond the extensions of your Manifest? More industrialists trying to run the gates is good, but I would rather be able to describe where I live as something other than "Nullsec without bubbles, but gate guns".
Regardless, I wish you luck sir. +1 Lo-sec is a conundrum, I freely admit. When you say "improve", what exactly do you mean by "improve"? "Improve for whom"? Defining the problem is the first step in constructing the solution. I feel that I have a fairly clear idea of what sov 0.0 should look like, but I freely confess that I'm not as sure about what kind of lo-sec we should be working towards. At the moment, lo-sec is a haven for small independent corps, and it's a ghetto. I can easily think of quite a few ideas to raise it up from ghetto status, but by the very act of making the space better, there's a danger to that "small corp haven" status. CCP did well to make Faction Warfare more attractive, and that has surely increased both the PvP activity and the economic activity in lo-sec. Would you like more of that?
More traffic is good, as FW has taught us, but you hit the nail on the head. Make lowsec too much better and why bother with null?
I guess I would like it better if we had something worth coming to (non-FW) lowsec to do or see, something beyond taking a shortcut. There was an old idea trotted out awhile back to allow pirates to corrupt a system, and anti-pirates, or even a rival pirate group, could reverse this trend and "purify" the system. Not that it would allow enough people to turn Rancer into Yulai, but perhaps with enough corruption, pirates would be able to temporarily disable or redirect gate guns. Or gain access to hidden stargates, run drugs for a new breed of NPC agents, or something like that. I've always seen lowsec as the murky underworld of EVE, and I hope some day it reflects that. Now I know you can't exactly walk up to CCP and tell them what to do, but maybe you can help plant a seed that will someday transform the bastard space of lowsec into something much more interesting and dynamic than gatecamps and ganking noobs in belts. |
Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development
Caldari Industrialist Association
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 14:53:00 -
[618] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Well all the directly EVE related topics seem to have been covered, so now I can address issues relevant to EVE players...
mynnna wrote:...but "tech moons are idiotic" has been the official stance of Goonswarm for a very long time...
Would you like to elaborate on how you would correct this situation? |
Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development
Caldari Industrialist Association
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 14:57:00 -
[619] - Quote
Dibblerette wrote:...run drugs...  Before I joined this game, I truly believed that lowsec... the home of pirates and the lawless would be where kinds of illegal activities and products would be found.
Perhaps... it just isn't PC. What a shame. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8305
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:03:00 -
[620] - Quote
See back around page 9 IIRC.
Basically:
1) Return the bottleneck material status to the R64s
2) Make each racial T2 ship/weapon line associated with one of the R64s
3) Rework the distribution of the R64s so each is mostly concentrated in one quadrant of the nullsec map, with a sprinkling in the others and in lo-sec to keep things lively
The number of R64s and the map-wide distribution will make it impractical to completely monopolise bottleneck T2 material as it is now, so base prices will cap the value of the "money moons" at the 'nice to have' level, not the "if you don't have any then you're a poor and can get out" level.
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
|
|
Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development
Caldari Industrialist Association
11
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 15:14:00 -
[621] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:See back around page 9 IIRC.
Basically:
1) Return the bottleneck material status to the R64s
2) Make each racial T2 ship/weapon line associated with one of the R64s
3) Rework the distribution of the R64s so each is mostly concentrated in one quadrant of the nullsec map, with a sprinkling in the others and in lo-sec to keep things lively
The number of R64s and the map-wide distribution will make it impractical to completely monopolise bottleneck T2 material as it is now, so base prices will cap the value of the "money moons" at the 'nice to have' level, not the "if you don't have any then you're a poor and can get out" level. I wanted to compare your view to that of the official Goonswarm candidate and see if you agree.
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8308
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 18:02:00 -
[622] - Quote
For those wishing to endorse my election attempt, please do so here
All votes gratefully received!
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Temba Ronin
206
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 19:01:00 -
[623] - Quote
If you like me want to help improve gameplay in EVE join me in endorsing Malcanis for CSM8.
Please use the link Malcanis posted above and endorse him.
Then VOTE MALCANIS for CSM8
Power To The Players! |
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
557
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 19:04:00 -
[624] - Quote
Malcanis,
With the changes on Mining Barges (ore cargo hold), almost no one jetcan mines anymore and so the Ore Thief career is on the brink of extinction. "Professional ore thieving" was alot of fun, it was something that made EvE unique, and now it's almost gone.
What's your take on this subject? |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8311
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 19:26:00 -
[625] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Malcanis,
With the changes on Mining Barges (ore cargo hold), almost no one jetcan mines anymore and so the Ore Thief career is on the brink of extinction. "Professional ore thieving" was alot of fun, it was something that made EvE unique, and now it's almost gone.
What's your take on this subject?
I think the Mack was overbuffed, tbh, and there should be a wider gap between the amount the Hulk can mine and the other two. You don't really lose anything by choosing the Mack, because it mines only a tiny amount less than the hulk and has enough tank to survive an economic gank, making the Procurer moot.
The mining barge change was good in principle, but I think CCP should have checked the maths of some of the wilder claims being made about ganking. Some very dishonest arguments were employed in that debate.
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Lord Zim
2304
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 20:25:00 -
[626] - Quote
If the mining barge change hadn't turned ore theft extinct, then the crimewatch 2.0 suspect-when-stealing-anything change probably would've.
Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. RIP Vile Rat |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8312
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 20:36:00 -
[627] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:If the mining barge change hadn't turned ore theft extinct, then the crimewatch 2.0 suspect-when-stealing-anything change probably would've.
People who run up to miners and mug them should expect to be shot at in EVE, but the possbility of mugging someone should be protected.
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Lord Zim
2304
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 20:47:00 -
[628] - Quote
There's a tiny bit of a difference between "that guy stole from me, I (and my corp) can shoot him now" to "that guy did something illegal, we can all shoot him now".
Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. RIP Vile Rat |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8312
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 20:53:00 -
[629] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:There's a tiny bit of a difference between "that guy stole from me, I (and my corp) can shoot him now" to "that guy did something illegal, we can all shoot him now".
I'm OK with that difference. What is less good is there being one obvious choice for mining with no downsides that obviates the situation from the start.
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Aineko Macx
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
251
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 21:55:00 -
[630] - Quote
I'm glad you're finally running. With your intellect, vision and levelheadedness you'd be a great addition to the CSM. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 29 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |