aye, and you can say - you can always bring JF with fuel for whole fleet too.
Do you know how many isotops use blockade runner when he jump in portal?
I think no, because you will need to have dedicated BO to portal only bloakade runner or other ships cannot jump in portal because you will be out of fuel.

if the sin is drone ship make it look like ... same Bandwidth than a Bs tech 1 , same number of drones than a Tech1 BS ....

Do something to Fix it SIN Should be an improved version of The Dominix

More deployable drones? more Bonus for drones ? more drone bay?? I would be nice to make the Black ops a mid ship between BS tech1 and dread.

Increase the base jump range of all Black Ops ships to 3.5 light years (equal to that of Titans)

does that mean bridge range too?

The Sin overhaul I would like to see is:
7/6/6 5 turrets +1
Gallente Battleship
+10% drone damage and hit points per level
+7.5% large hybrid tracking per level
Black Ops
+10% Fighter damage and hit points per level
+125% cloaked velocity per level

Drone bay 400m3
Fighter Bay 50,000m3

That is of course if the system will allow two drone bays on a ship.

GTFO.
fighters, on a BS hull?

people like you make CCP devs pluck out their own eyes in agony and regret and run away from legit discussion threads.

lets break this down for one sec
The Sin overhaul I would like to see is:

where in that statement does it say that people will quit if this does not happen?

lol you're bad. read it, understand what I'm saying; I said your post was so bad that it makes CCP devs lose brain cells, that it makes people bleed from their eyes as they read it, causes mothers to miscarry and if you recite your post under fullmoon with a creepy voice, it will spoil milk.

it doesn't make people "quit" the game.

also fighters are frigate sized ships, think about it, lore-wise, physics wise, game-mechanics-wise. Just think.
then post.

If those Blops price could come down a little bit too, this would make them also more attractive.

Meh wants more low slots on Widow plz

With that changes Black Ops remain just for hot dropping.

Useful changes would be the capability to fit Covert Ops Cloaking Device II and racial EWAR bonuses. Black Ops should be recon battleships, so you could use them for high, low, null and w-space.

Also, T3 are still better in every way than black ops. Bridging is nice, but not useful for everyone.

Letting black ops bs fit focused point (not the bubble part) would be nice. Would make for black opsing on supers viable.

, as well as on Blockade Runners. This means that the availability of covert cynos is consistent and simple. If you can jump through the bridge you can light the cyno.

Letting black ops bs fit focused point (not the bubble part) would be nice. Would make for black opsing on supers viable.

Greetings spacefriends.

Open up the use of Covert Cynosural Field Generators on any Strategic Cruiser that has the Covert Reconfiguration subsystem fitted, as well as on Blockade Runners. This means that the availability of covert cynos is consistent and simple. If you can jump through the bridge you can light the cyno.

:

:Update Jan 21st:
We have also refactored the methods used to limit older modules to certain ships. Most of the ships changed by this will simply have a more clear description (Can fit module X rather than -99% CPU to module X) but there are two gameplay improvements this change allowed us to make:
[list] [b]

Change the CPU requirements of Covops cloaks to 100 and change the bonus on coverts, recons and blockade runners to "-20% CPU needed for cloaks per level". This means that cloaks will use the same CPU at level 5 (0) but the CPU use at lower levels is less crippling, making the use of these ships at less than level 4-5 more viable.

On Singularity when trying to fit a Drone Control Unit I to a Thanatos I am not getting the 99% CPU and thus am unable to put them online.

Did Fozzie break this?

I bug reported it already.

Does this mean Capital's won't be able to cloak anymore?

Any thoughts on the High slots of Blockade Runners now that they can theoretically fit CovOps Cynos (and in practice, only one of them can)?

Rebalancing BRs is outside the scope of this patch. I love feature creep as much as the next designer but I need to draw a line somewhere.

Yup that was me. I fixed it last week but we haven't been able to update Sisi with the new build yet.
Thanks as always for the bug report.

I also discovered something really surprising about the Pilgrim during this whole adventure, but I'll save that for a funny fanfest story.