| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3119
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:42:00 -
[61] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Ed: Also, Petrus... this thread is most unlike you guys. Seriously, it's just ******* stupid. Sigh... I guess you simply never noticed how much I loved flying my Drake. Those days are gone, now, of course.
I'm pretty sure that no amount of Drake love can excuse the random crap you guys are spewing all up in this thread. But while we're on the topic: why can't you use the Drake now? I'm seeing it being 20m/s slower with the same tank and more DPS. What's the problem?
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries
127
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:46:00 -
[62] - Quote
Kahega Amielden wrote:Is the textual diarrhea known as "Tiericide"
Ship choice used to matter. Flying something like a Merlin or a Tristan or a Vexor took skill. Only people who knew what they were doing could do it properly in the face of the FotM. Now, all that ship variety we used to have has been reduced to a bunch of different reskins of the exact same ship - just orbit and hit F1. Literally the only "Choice" left is whether we want to hear lasers or projectile sounds.
I'm slightly sympathetic, despite the hyperbole. Skillful pilotting of a ship which conventional wisdom says is poor is a great thing for getting people to engage you in solo and small gang PvP and with the improvements in so many ships there are fewer such niche ships. However with so many more "good" ships there should be more people who are confident enough in their own ship to take a few risks - The two sides of the equation don't quite balance but I don't think it's exactly dire...
Kahega Amielden wrote:Now, with Retribution 1.1, CCP nerfed some of the last two effective small gang PVP platforms left in the game: the Drake and the Hurricane. These ships had the right combination of tank and damage that a good pilot could pick off stragglers from a blob. The Cane's loss of a utility high means that it's now incapable of dealing with fast tackle, and the drake flies like a brick now.
And finally, as if the prior changes weren't enough, CCP is planning on nerfing offgrid links. Good luck trying to outmaneuver a blob now.
Wait... what??? I thought this was a thread about player skill, getting fights and the underdog over the FotM... |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3119
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:50:00 -
[63] - Quote
Jacob Holland wrote:Kahega Amielden wrote:Is the textual diarrhea known as "Tiericide"
Ship choice used to matter. Flying something like a Merlin or a Tristan or a Vexor took skill. Only people who knew what they were doing could do it properly in the face of the FotM. Now, all that ship variety we used to have has been reduced to a bunch of different reskins of the exact same ship - just orbit and hit F1. Literally the only "Choice" left is whether we want to hear lasers or projectile sounds. I'm slightly sympathetic, despite the hyperbole. Skillful pilotting of a ship which conventional wisdom says is poor is a great thing for getting people to engage you in solo and small gang PvP and with the improvements in so many ships there are fewer such niche ships. However with so many more "good" ships there should be more people who are confident enough in their own ship to take a few risks - The two sides of the equation don't quite balance but I don't think it's exactly dire... Kahega Amielden wrote:Now, with Retribution 1.1, CCP nerfed some of the last two effective small gang PVP platforms left in the game: the Drake and the Hurricane. These ships had the right combination of tank and damage that a good pilot could pick off stragglers from a blob. The Cane's loss of a utility high means that it's now incapable of dealing with fast tackle, and the drake flies like a brick now.
And finally, as if the prior changes weren't enough, CCP is planning on nerfing offgrid links. Good luck trying to outmaneuver a blob now. Wait... what??? I thought this was a thread about player skill, getting fights and the underdog over the FotM...
That was you not reading his original post. The Merlin and Vexor were always strong ships and have consistently been rated in the "top 3" of their ship class... well, since forever.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:55:00 -
[64] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Ed: Also, Petrus... this thread is most unlike you guys. Seriously, it's just ******* stupid. Sigh... I guess you simply never noticed how much I loved flying my Drake. Those days are gone, now, of course. I'm pretty sure that no amount of Drake love can excuse the random crap you guys are spewing all up in this thread. But while we're on the topic: why can't you use the Drake now? I'm seeing it being 20m/s slower with the same tank and more DPS. What's the problem? -Liang I'm not sure how you're getting the "same tank" since the Drake got a flat out reduction to its base HP. It is also not only slower but less agile (more massive) and thus far more poorly suited for small gang PvP. On top of that, the "higher damage" claim is only applicable if you use HAMs, which is an exceptionally bad idea when fighting outnumbered, as it means you are probably close enough to not have any route of escape, and will likely just die an embarassing death. HMLs on the Drake are now worthless. Not only do they do significantly less damage, but the "buff" that Fury missiles received also made them be as bad at hitting things as torpedoes are, cutting off the only way to get even close to the same performance.
So, yeah, i'm really enjoying this "buffed" Drake. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
369
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:58:00 -
[65] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Ed: Also, Petrus... this thread is most unlike you guys. Seriously, it's just ******* stupid. Sigh... I guess you simply never noticed how much I loved flying my Drake. Those days are gone, now, of course. I'm pretty sure that no amount of Drake love can excuse the random crap you guys are spewing all up in this thread. But while we're on the topic: why can't you use the Drake now? I'm seeing it being 20m/s slower with the same tank and more DPS. What's the problem? -Liang I'm not sure how you're getting the "same tank" since the Drake got a flat out reduction to its base HP. It is also not only slower but less agile (more massive) and thus far more poorly suited for small gang PvP. On top of that, the "higher damage" claim is only applicable if you use HAMs, which is an exceptionally bad idea when fighting outnumbered, as it means you are probably close enough to not have any route of escape, and will likely just die an embarassing death. HMLs on the Drake are now worthless. Not only do they do significantly less damage, but the "buff" that Fury missiles received also made them be as bad at hitting things as torpedoes are, cutting off the only way to get even close to the same performance. So, yeah, i'm really enjoying this "buffed" Drake. You still get almost double the EHP of any other shield BC and the same DPS. How people can whine about that is beyond me |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:58:00 -
[66] - Quote
Also, to the naysayers who think I'm talking out of you-know-where, I encourage you to check my killboard stats to see why I am so disappointed that my favorite ships have been ruined. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3119
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:02:00 -
[67] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: I'm not sure how you're getting the "same tank" since the Drake got a flat out reduction to its base HP. It is also not only slower but less agile (more massive) and thus far more poorly suited for small gang PvP. On top of that, the "higher damage" claim is only applicable if you use HAMs, which is an exceptionally bad idea when fighting outnumbered, as it means you are probably close enough to not have any route of escape, and will likely just die an embarassing death. HMLs on the Drake are now worthless. Not only do they do significantly less damage, but the "buff" that Fury missiles received also made them be as bad at hitting things as torpedoes are, cutting off the only way to get even close to the same performance.
So, yeah, i'm really enjoying this "buffed" Drake.
This was my old solo PVP Drake: [Drake, Solo PVP HAM Drake] Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Damage Control II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Warp Scrambler II Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Small Unstable Power Fluctuator I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Warrior II x5
Stats: - 80318 EHP - 599 DPS - 1038 m/s - 11.2 sec align
I loaded up the new EFT and made a couple of tweaks: [Drake, Solo PVP HAM Drake] Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Damage Control II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Large Shield Extender II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Warp Scrambler II Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile [empty high slot]
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Warrior II x5
Stats: - 79606 EHP - 614 DPS - 1003 m/s - 11.9 sec align
So the stat differences: - EHP: <1% Nerf - DPS: 2.5% Buff (Also, you can now overheat longer yielding even more *real* DPS) - Speed: 3.5% Nerf - Agility: 6% Nerf
Sorry, not seeing the cause for QQ. Maybe you had a different fit that was negatively affected?
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
369
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:08:00 -
[68] - Quote
Liang. Wat are yu doing? Liang. Stahp!
You are ruining his reason to whine over nothing! |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
206
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:20:00 -
[69] - Quote
What I don't get is they nerfed the dual neut cane into the ground because it was "unbalanced" then tweaked the cyclone so it can do 600dps with dual neuts with plenty of mobility and serviceable tank (and in the hands of the right pilot will utterly destroy a cane 1v1 due to being able to apply full dps from enough range the cane is losing dps to falloff)... really don't see the need to nerf the cane down as far as they have. Seems to have been put down like a rabid dog as if someone has a personal issue with it rather than anything else. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:21:00 -
[70] - Quote
Rroff wrote:What I don't get is they nerfed the dual neut cane into the ground because it was "unbalanced" then tweaked the cyclone so it can do 600dps with dual neuts with plenty of mobility and serviceable tank (and in the hands of the right pilot will utterly destroy a cane 1v1 due to being able to apply full dps from enough range the cane is losing dps to falloff)... really don't see the need to nerf the cane down as far as they have. It's called "Retribution" for a reason...  Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:24:00 -
[71] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:-- HAM Drake -- Remember how I said it's all "Approach, F1" nowadays? Yeah... Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
206
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:25:00 -
[72] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Rroff wrote:What I don't get is they nerfed the dual neut cane into the ground because it was "unbalanced" then tweaked the cyclone so it can do 600dps with dual neuts with plenty of mobility and serviceable tank (and in the hands of the right pilot will utterly destroy a cane 1v1 due to being able to apply full dps from enough range the cane is losing dps to falloff)... really don't see the need to nerf the cane down as far as they have. It's called "Retribution" for a reason... 
I just wonder if they realise what they've done to the cyclone given the rhetoric used to justify nerfing the cane when the new cyclone can be fitted out in the exact way that rhetoric was aimed at. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:26:00 -
[73] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Rroff wrote:What I don't get is they nerfed the dual neut cane into the ground because it was "unbalanced" then tweaked the cyclone so it can do 600dps with dual neuts with plenty of mobility and serviceable tank (and in the hands of the right pilot will utterly destroy a cane 1v1 due to being able to apply full dps from enough range the cane is losing dps to falloff)... really don't see the need to nerf the cane down as far as they have. It's called "Retribution" for a reason... 
The Cane is still a fine BC. I think people just forgot that every other ship in the game requires these crazy things called "fittings skills" and more intelligence "put on biggest of everything". The Cane is still superior to the Cyclone for a lot of things, and still worse for others. It's almost like there's a reason to fly something other than The Almighty Cane and The Almighty Drake.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:27:00 -
[74] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:-- HAM Drake -- Remember how I said it's all "Approach, F1" nowadays? Yeah...
Remember how I said that I looked at the Nano Drake and about a dozen fits and they all had the same song and dance? Yeah...
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:28:00 -
[75] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Rroff wrote:What I don't get is they nerfed the dual neut cane into the ground because it was "unbalanced" then tweaked the cyclone so it can do 600dps with dual neuts with plenty of mobility and serviceable tank (and in the hands of the right pilot will utterly destroy a cane 1v1 due to being able to apply full dps from enough range the cane is losing dps to falloff)... really don't see the need to nerf the cane down as far as they have. It's called "Retribution" for a reason...  I just wonder if they realise what they've done to the cyclone given the rhetoric used to justify nerfing the cane when the new cyclone can be fitted out in the exact way that rhetoric was aimed at.
I just wonder if you realize how stupid you look, or if you're gonna wake up in the morning with that "Whoa, what the **** did I do last night?!" feeling.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:35:00 -
[76] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:
I just wonder if you realize how stupid you look, or if you're gonna wake up in the morning with that "Whoa, what the **** did I do last night?!" feeling.
-Liang
There was very specific comments made about the cane hinting towards a fitting doctrine that was supposedly over powered for a BC regardless of tier, etc. and used to justify the need to put it in its place... but post patch the cyclone can be made to fit the very role they were claiming was the reason for putting the cane down. I find it a bit confusing. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:35:00 -
[77] - Quote
I wonder what's going to be "OP" next. Ooh, ooh! Maybe the Abaddon will lose its tank bonus for one of those useless cap usage bonuses. We already know the Typhoon is getting turned into an "Approach, F1" brick that takes no skill to fly. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:39:00 -
[78] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:I wonder what's going to be "OP" next. Ooh, ooh! Maybe the Abaddon will lose its tank bonus for one of those useless cap usage bonuses. We already know the Typhoon is getting turned into an "Approach, F1" brick that takes no skill to fly.
You seem to have this dramatic aversion to all things missile. So, tell us about this non-F1 Drake fit you had.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:39:00 -
[79] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:
I just wonder if you realize how stupid you look, or if you're gonna wake up in the morning with that "Whoa, what the **** did I do last night?!" feeling.
-Liang
There was very specific comments made about the cane hinting towards a fitting doctrine that was supposedly over powered for a BC regardless of tier, etc. and used to justify the need to put it in its place... but post patch the cyclone can be made to fit (which it couldn't before) the very role they were claiming was the reason for putting the cane down. I find it a bit confusing.
It's ok hun. It'll all be ok and better in the morning dearie.
/pat pat
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Dante Uisen
Push button receive bacon
110
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:42:00 -
[80] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:You seem to have this dramatic aversion to all things missile. So, tell us about this non-F1 Drake fit you had.
You group the launchers on F2 |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:42:00 -
[81] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote: It's ok hun. It'll all be ok and better in the morning dearie.
/pat pat
-Liang
Can only assume your completely missing the point of what I'm saying as the responses aren't in any way an appropriate one. If you actually have something useful to contribute say it. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:46:00 -
[82] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Can only assume your completely missing the point of what I'm saying as the responses aren't in any way an appropriate one.
The two ships are so dissimilar as to be quite astounding. The Cane is a gun ship with all of the advantages that it brings. The dual neutralizer setups were quite hard on close range frigates, but were otherwise mostly useless. Notably, if you were in range to be using the neutralizers you were dealing ~700-800 DPS. On the flip side, the Cyclone tops out at about 500 DPS @ 15km and has terrible projection against frigates.
The two are worlds apart.
-Liang
Ed: Now that I've showed you how you're a complete ******* ******, do you want to stop poasting about how stupid you are? That'd be great. Thanks in advance. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:48:00 -
[83] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Rroff wrote:Can only assume your completely missing the point of what I'm saying as the responses aren't in any way an appropriate one. The two ships are so dissimilar as to be quite astounding. The Cane is a gun ship with all of the advantages that it brings. The dual neutralizer setups were quite hard on close range frigates, but were otherwise mostly useless. Notably, if you were in range to be using the neutralizers you were dealing ~700-800 DPS. On the flip side, the Cyclone tops out at about 500 DPS @ 15km and has terrible projection against frigates. The two are worlds apart. -Liang Ed: Now that I've showed you how you're a complete ******* ******, do you want to stop poasting about how stupid you are? That'd be great. Thanks in advance.
As I thought your missing the point of what I'm saying. I'm saying its possible to fit the cyclone to do just that - apply around 600dps and dual neuts against stuff including small ships with the new changes - as I said I'm guessing CCP has overlooked what I'm talking about as it makes no sense in comparison to the rhetoric used to change the cane.
EDIT: (OK it doesn't apply damage quite as effectively against small stuff as the cane used to be able to do with dual webs but its not so hideously behind it that it makes much odds in actual gameplay).
EDIT2: Beside the rhetoric wasn't used about its ability to hit small frigs infact that ability is unchanged with the current cane setup. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:49:00 -
[84] - Quote
Please show me this dual neut fit that applies 600 DPS to small ships.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:52:00 -
[85] - Quote
Rroff wrote: EDIT: (OK it doesn't apply damage quite as effectively against small stuff as the cane used to be able to do with dual webs but its not so hideously behind it that it makes much odds in actual gameplay).
You bring this dual neut Cyclone to Amamake and I'll fight you in a frigate. You won't leave alive.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:57:00 -
[86] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Rroff wrote: EDIT: (OK it doesn't apply damage quite as effectively against small stuff as the cane used to be able to do with dual webs but its not so hideously behind it that it makes much odds in actual gameplay).
You bring this dual neut Cyclone to Amamake and I'll fight you in a frigate. You won't leave alive. -Liang
Oh I'm pretty sure I wouldn't leave alive but probably not due to your frig (alone)...
Besides its not the main point of what I'm saying - the cane even post nerf can still do dual web, single neut + turret dps against frigs plenty effectively that wasn't the role that it was getting savaged for. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:59:00 -
[87] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Oh I'm pretty sure I wouldn't leave alive but probably not due to your frig (alone)...
Hardly the first BC I'd solo in a frigate. But maybe we're starting to talk about that dreaded "skill" thing the OP mentions but seems to lack. :)
Quote:Besides its not the main point of what I'm saying - the cane even post nerf can still do dual web, single neut + turret dps against frigs plenty effectively that wasn't the role that it was getting savaged for.
So... the Cane is fine now and the Cyclone can't fulfill the role the dual neut Cane did before. Oh... uh, cool. Guess the game designers did know what they were doing afterall.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Arronicus
Vintas Industries Mistakes Were Made.
235
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:05:00 -
[88] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote:Quote:Tiericide made the Caracal a beastly killing machine, buffed the thorax, made the stabber better, and made some pretty freaking badass support cruisers Tiericide Improved the drake's dps, improved the harbinger's dps, took the hurricane down a slight notch to not be the king of small gang pvp go-to ship, and improved the myrmidon's practical dps lol. ccp buffed scrub ships like t1 firgates and cruisers cause blobbers are afraid to fly something that costs more than a few million iskies. why would you even fly a bc or hac now that cruisers are just as good and cost halve or tenth as much. meanwhile, their going to nerf real pvp ships like t3s because scrubs dont have the balls to field something worth that much so they whine intil ccp does something about it. o7m8s enjoy ur carebear pvp.
Oh oh! Seems I struck a nerve with an eve elitist who thinks "Hurr durr, only t3/t2 should be used in pvp!" |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:06:00 -
[89] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:
So... the Cane is fine now and the Cyclone can't fulfill the role the dual neut Cane did before. Oh... uh, cool. Guess the game designers did know what they were doing afterall.
-Liang
I got a bit side tracked with your silliness about hitting frigs as the cyclone can in this fit still do it fairly well - tho not as well as the cane can - but thats entirely aside from my original point which was a the rhetoric used to nerf a certain fitting style on the cane that has nothing to do with its ability to hit frigs, which it can no longer do and was supposedly unbalanced in a BC yet the cyclone post patch can do it which it couldn't before. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3122
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:10:00 -
[90] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:
So... the Cane is fine now and the Cyclone can't fulfill the role the dual neut Cane did before. Oh... uh, cool. Guess the game designers did know what they were doing afterall.
-Liang
I got a bit side tracked with your silliness about hitting frigs as the cyclone can in this fit still do it fairly well - tho not as well as the cane can - but thats entirely aside from my original point which was a the rhetoric used to nerf a certain fitting style on the cane that has nothing to do with its ability to hit frigs, which it can no longer do and was supposedly unbalanced in a BC yet the cyclone post patch can do it which it couldn't before.
I still don't believe that the Cyclone evinces the same behavior that the Hurricane did. I continue to offer you the ability to prove me wrong upon the honourable field of combat. Additionally, the ability to fit two neuts isn't strictly what was talked about - there were a whole host of other issues.
Perhaps you'd like to quote the post you're referencing in full? :)
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |