| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kurt Saken
State War Academy Caldari State
79
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:38:00 -
[151] - Quote
It hurts a bit to see one of your favourite ships in the game getting nerfed, but Drakes and Canes are still kings compared to the rest of BCs (except Nagas and Nados).
Anyway, most of the "battles" in EvE are decided before starting, so we shouldn't worry too much about the "balances". It's all about overwhelming the opponent and that is all.
Sure you can have good fights here and there, but this isn't common.
Edit. Typo |

Solstice Project
Brave Newbies Inc.
2777
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:39:00 -
[152] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Andski wrote:"guys we were just trolling LOL gotcha" I'm actually waiting for this - back pedaling is the most sincere form of admitting defeat. Tch, you'd deem me a mere troll? I'll be a Drake pilot till the day I die. 1372 kills in them and going strong. I am just lamenting the ruin of what used to once be a good ship to now being a second rate piece of trash. Of course I'll "adapt" (geez you guys are like a broken record), but the reason I am complaining is because I do not think adapting is possible after so much performance reduction. I'm sure there are others who feel the same. Ah ... yes, i misunderstood the part about "Approach, F1". My bad.
Anyhow ... you're actually confirming that it was overpowered. 1372 kills ... hey, that's great. Really, nice work ... ... but why couldn't you do that in anything else than a drake ?
Why didn't you pull that off in anything else ?
Why did you use the drake ?
Because the other ships were crap ? Or because the drake was overpowered ? Thanks ... no need to respond, you've already shown your obvious bias.
Now stop ruining your credibility ... because that's what you do.
Thanks. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2339
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:40:00 -
[153] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:no need to respond Right, and I'm the troll here.  Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
1523
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:51:00 -
[154] - Quote
Kahega Amielden wrote:Bienator II wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Okay so if everything is so good, tell me: how would you handle a blob if you're solo or in a small gang (5-10 people or less). Oh and don't say "bring links" because CCP are about to nerf those too as part of their crusade to buff the goon blob. why do you believe you should be able to fight a blob solo? Because skill should mean more than numbers.
it does. The skill to run from the blob is part of it if you know you can not cause any damage.
what you wanted to say is that your cookie cutter OGB fitting should win the fight. Since boosted solo ships are currently so far out of balance that you can ignore any "eve skills" like situational awareness or ship knowledge. Your whole argument does not make sense. Balancing is wrong since you can no longer fly good ships? You can now fly good ships all the time. Sure your opponent has a good ship too, but thats where the fun starts.
i don't give a *** when i die to a blob. But i DO care if i die in engagements where i thought they where fair. Thats when i start to search for mistakes or optimize fittings. Those fights are good fights, since they are challenging. a eve-style bounty system (done)-á dust boarding parties You fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Keno Skir
Vectis Covert Solutions
395
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:54:00 -
[155] - Quote
All i think reading this thread is that Petrus Blackshell needs to put his toys back in the pram.
You used to post useful and interesting PvP based articles and threads. You were once the first to point out that if someone is failing at PvP it's because they didn't have a good enough plan.
Seems all that's gone out the window now your win button has been taken away..
No offence intended but i never thought i'd be yelling HTFU at you Petrus  If you have any further thoughts on something i've posted, or want to ask an unrelated question feel free to contact me by EvE Mail or by private conversation if 'm online. BUDDY TRIALS AVAILABLE - 21days plus big ISK bonus and starting assistance |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3136
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 17:55:00 -
[156] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: They. Were. Not. Overpowered. They were the only ships with proper fittings and attributes to do their damn jobs. Now they've been nerfed to be the same as the rest of the crap they call for "ships". Why not pull those up instead, hmm?
I don't think you've ever fought Rifterlings (you don't show up on our KB), so it's understandable why you wouldn't understand how much the Drake means to us. You should really check it and see what we fight in those "keep at range and F1" Drakes before you level stupid accusations like that.
Hum.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3136
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 17:57:00 -
[157] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Andski wrote:"guys we were just trolling LOL gotcha" I'm actually waiting for this - back pedaling is the most sincere form of admitting defeat. Tch, you'd deem me a mere troll? I'll be a Drake pilot till the day I die. 1372 kills in them and going strong. I am just lamenting the ruin of what used to once be a good ship to now being a second rate piece of trash. Of course I'll "adapt" (geez you guys are like a broken record), but the reason I am complaining is because I do not think adapting is possible after so much performance reduction. I'm sure there are others who feel the same.
Hmmm. I suspect we'll see a second balancing pass. I'm pretty sure the "Drake" will get nerfed again. Just because of this thread. 
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
771
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 18:13:00 -
[158] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: I'm not sure how you're getting the "same tank" since the Drake got a flat out reduction to its base HP. It is also not only slower but less agile (more massive) and thus far more poorly suited for small gang PvP. On top of that, the "higher damage" claim is only applicable if you use HAMs, which is an exceptionally bad idea when fighting outnumbered, as it means you are probably close enough to not have any route of escape, and will likely just die an embarassing death. HMLs on the Drake are now worthless. Not only do they do significantly less damage, but the "buff" that Fury missiles received also made them be as bad at hitting things as torpedoes are, cutting off the only way to get even close to the same performance.
So, yeah, i'm really enjoying this "buffed" Drake.
I keep coming back to this. See, here's the problem I have: I check-fitted my primary Drake fitting last night, and found a 50% greater throw-weight with a less than 10% EHP hit, and a less than 5% velocity hit.
My Drake hits MUCH harder now than before. I was even able to dump my comically-expensive BCS units for some T2s, and retain almost all of the firepower buff. It's taken minor losses in maneuverability and toughness. Yes, I'm using HAMs. I was using HAMs before, too. Yes, it means managing your ship more intensely, but that's learnable. You're calling the result 'Trash." I'm looking at it and thinking: "Hmm. Interesting..."
Can't wait to take it out and test-drive it this evening. 
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
209
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 18:13:00 -
[159] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote:
The hurricane was one of the most broken ships in the game specifically because it was laughably easy to fit. Apparently CCP meant it to be an artillery platform, so its AC variations had a ludicrous amount of grid with which to fit largest guns + heaviest tank + dual medium neuts. On top of that, it was as fast as a cruiser with virtually no drawback to being so. If you wanted to pick a ship which was ruining small pvp by overshadowing most of the alternatives, the hurricane would be a good choice.
And it's hardly ruined. It's received a minor agility nerf, lost a bit of utility, and now you have to think about what you put on it and why you want those 425mm ACs rather than 220mms.
I agree there were situations where you could fit 425s where the proper compromise would have been it shouldn't have been able to fit above 220s but overall I felt it was fairly well balanced with a good play between tank and dps with some granluarity between the levels of dps and tank you could get out of it or speed and tank, etc. far too many ships you either have to go with a half arsed fit thats not very good at either or bias heavily for tank or heavily for dps with very little in the way of inbetween compromises - something that has now with this patch mostly been fixed with the other BCs but I don't think warranted changing the cane as much as it has been. |

Murk Paradox
Dvice Shipyards No Value
260
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 20:25:00 -
[160] - Quote
silens vesica wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote: I'm not sure how you're getting the "same tank" since the Drake got a flat out reduction to its base HP. It is also not only slower but less agile (more massive) and thus far more poorly suited for small gang PvP. On top of that, the "higher damage" claim is only applicable if you use HAMs, which is an exceptionally bad idea when fighting outnumbered, as it means you are probably close enough to not have any route of escape, and will likely just die an embarassing death. HMLs on the Drake are now worthless. Not only do they do significantly less damage, but the "buff" that Fury missiles received also made them be as bad at hitting things as torpedoes are, cutting off the only way to get even close to the same performance.
So, yeah, i'm really enjoying this "buffed" Drake.
I keep coming back to this. See, here's the problem I have: I check-fitted my primary Drake fitting last night, and found a 50% greater throw-weight with a less than 10% EHP hit, and a less than 5% velocity hit. My Drake hits MUCH harder now than before. I was even able to dump my comically-expensive BCS units for some T2s, and retain almost all of the firepower buff. It's taken minor losses in maneuverability and toughness. Yes, I'm using HAMs. I was using HAMs before, too. Yes, it means managing your ship more intensely, but that's learnable. You're calling the result 'Trash." I'm looking at it and thinking: "Hmm. Interesting..." Can't wait to take it out and test-drive it this evening. 
I remade a Prophecy (oldschool theorycrafting) and well, it's freakin psychotically fun. If that's a description.
I had T2 lasers on it but opted to neut and ewar instead (super arbitrator drone boat big brother type).
Tonight I play with my harbinger, which has about the SAME dps as my Abaddon! (600+ I'm not T2 large laser yet ). "I say tomato, you say tomaCCP BAN ALL TOMATOES THEY ARE HARASSING ME I WANT TOMATO FREE HIGHSEC."-á -TheGunslinger42 Proud enforcer of the Code, see [url]http://www.minerbumping.com[/url]-á for details. |

Vol Arm'OOO
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
71
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 20:50:00 -
[161] - Quote
Hamatitio wrote:I like what they've done so far, the drake and hurricane were good... A little too good. They stated in the dev blog that they couldn't bring all BCs to the level of the drake and hurricane, because that would make the cruisers they just finished balancing pointless again.
They needed to bring them down a little bit, and I'm personally glad they brought the other ones up.
When was the last time you saw a prophecy in game? And the myrmidon can now field 5 heavy / sentry drones 4, so its actually better than a vexor. edit: in the drone department
Tiericide is good for EVE, it brings more viable ships to the table, and from what I've seen opens up for a variety of fittings, and not the same old setups we've had for 3-4 years now.
Edited for being bad at math and conceding defeat to the obvious myrm flyers out there :)
I find comments like this funny - terricide did not make more ships viable - rather it simply reshuffled the deck. In case you didnt notice the new FOTM for bc's now is the brutix. Worse terricide took most of the players choice out of the process of fitting the ships. Most of these ships only have one correct way to be fitted and/or used now - ships are missile ships or projectile ships shield ships, armor ships, etc. . . Possibilities for innovation have been removed/limited. Ultimately terricide is about restricting player choice and removing sand from the box, which is bad for a game that markets itself as a sandbox. |

Wacktopia
Noir. Black Legion.
470
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 20:51:00 -
[162] - Quote
Funny. Just did a year of small gang PVP without flying either drake or cane. What did I miss?... The bottom line is that now I have one of those annoying signatures. |

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
446
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 20:54:00 -
[163] - Quote
goons own eve, i own #tweetfleet Follow me on twitter |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2812
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 20:57:00 -
[164] - Quote
So basically because two BCs got brought down to be in line with ALL THE OTHER BCS, small gangs have been nerfed.
And because some frigates were underpowered and got buffed, suddenly everything is no-skill "orbit and F1" PVP.
OP is whining because his ship of choice got hit with a nerfbat. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2812
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 21:01:00 -
[165] - Quote
Vol Arm'OOO wrote:terricide took most of the players choice out of the process of fitting the ships. Most of these ships only have one correct way to be fitted and/or used now - ships are missile ships or projectile ships shield ships, armor ships, etc. . . Possibilities for innovation have been removed/limited.
I disagree. The BCs have ALWAYS had specific weapon and tank roles, and your fitting options were always generally limited to the balance of gank and tank. I'm going to be looking at the new BCs over the next few days specifically to find some out-of-the-box fits, and I promise you there will be some good ones. Give it a month and you'll see just as much variety in fits as before; possibly more considering some of the changes to armor. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 21:20:00 -
[166] - Quote
Vol Arm'OOO wrote:In case you didnt notice the new FOTM for bc's now is the brutix. Riiiight. Obviously the new meta has fully developed in the single day since the patch came out, and you're the only one who's been brilliant enough to see it  |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT
282
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 21:29:00 -
[167] - Quote
The Drake needed balancing.
Folks bitching today, in most cases, likely weren't around when the Drake was actually much, much tougher. Not including the far more recent changes to heavy missiles, there was also (if memory serves) a change to the shield recharge rate and another change to it's base shield capacity.
Like it or don't, and I'm a little PO'd myself, it still had to be done. Have a large alcoholic beverage to salute the "Days of Yore" and get over it. 
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Davion Falcon
Those Once Loyal
36
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 21:42:00 -
[168] - Quote
No, really? Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise. Never forgotten, never forgiven. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3138
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:03:00 -
[169] - Quote
Congratulations, you are Eve Forum User #70344334663945612347 to comment on that. None of the others were able to accomplish their goal either. You lose. Would you like to play again?
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2822
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:06:00 -
[170] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:The Drake needed balancing. Folks bitching today, in most cases, likely weren't around when the Drake was actually much, much tougher. Not including the far more recent changes to heavy missiles, there was also (if memory serves) a change to the shield recharge rate and another change to it's base shield capacity. Like it or don't, and I'm a little PO'd myself, it still had to be done. Have a large alcoholic beverage to salute the "Days of Yore" and get over it.  What I find funny about it is he starts off ranting about how "some ships required skill to fly" and then goes on to say that nerfing the two most OP battlecruisers was a terrible idea. Heaven forbid CCP make other stuff viable to fight against his ship of choice. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3138
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:10:00 -
[171] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: What I find funny about it is he starts off ranting about how "some ships required skill to fly" and then goes on to say that nerfing the two most OP battlecruisers was a terrible idea. Heaven forbid CCP make other stuff viable to fight against his ship of choice.
I didn't notice it at first because of who introduced the thread, but this thread is not actually about battlecruisers.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
791
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:15:00 -
[172] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:So basically because two BCs got brought down to be in line with ALL THE OTHER BCS, small gangs have been nerfed.
And because some frigates were underpowered and got buffed, suddenly everything is no-skill "orbit and F1" PVP.
OP is whining because his ship of choice got hit with a nerfbat. The really hilarious part about this is that it wasn't much of a nerf. From where I sit, it actually looks like a buff: Trade a bit of tank and velocity for the ability to punch much harder in-close. I win. 
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
602
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:22:00 -
[173] - Quote
silens vesica wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:So basically because two BCs got brought down to be in line with ALL THE OTHER BCS, small gangs have been nerfed.
And because some frigates were underpowered and got buffed, suddenly everything is no-skill "orbit and F1" PVP.
OP is whining because his ship of choice got hit with a nerfbat. The really hilarious part about this is that it wasn't much of a nerf. From where I sit, it actually looks like a buff: Trade a bit of tank and velocity for the ability to punch much harder in-close. I win. 
This Even if Hurricane got a very little nerf bat it was necessary, this ship is still very competitive be it armor or shield tank and can do exactly the same thing it did before except for the loss of one med neutralizer that could in a single run cap dry small ships a-la-god-mode. This change was needed, I fly those as much as I can because this ship is just amazing, and I'll keep flying them.
Drake from where I stand I couldn't agree more with Silens, a very smart change offering newer as older players a very good platform for pvp solo, small gang and fleets still ! -how to not like it? *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
467
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:25:00 -
[174] - Quote
Posting in a epic noobzor thread. If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2340
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:25:00 -
[175] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: What I find funny about it is he starts off ranting about how "some ships required skill to fly" and then goes on to say that nerfing the two most OP battlecruisers was a terrible idea. Heaven forbid CCP make other stuff viable to fight against his ship of choice.
I didn't notice it at first because of who introduced the thread, but this thread is not actually about battlecruisers. -Liang I think someone may be getting what this is all about. Enlighten us, please? Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3138
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:33:00 -
[176] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: What I find funny about it is he starts off ranting about how "some ships required skill to fly" and then goes on to say that nerfing the two most OP battlecruisers was a terrible idea. Heaven forbid CCP make other stuff viable to fight against his ship of choice.
I didn't notice it at first because of who introduced the thread, but this thread is not actually about battlecruisers. -Liang I think someone may be getting what this is all about. Enlighten us, please?
It's way more fun if I don't. 
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2340
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:36:00 -
[177] - Quote
So now that Drakefleet is no longer an option, what do the almighty always-right forum warriors of GD recommend that my corp use for FW roams? Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3138
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:46:00 -
[178] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:So now that Drakefleet is no longer an option, what do the almighty always-right forum warriors of GD recommend that my corp use for FW roams?
I enjoyed the Slasher roam you guys did, personally. I think you should have had some people fit MWDs though.
-Liang
Ed: Also, Inty/Bomber roams are always pretty fun. I've been looking at doing a Malediction roam too. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Xessej
Darqsyde Exploration Limited Mass - Effect
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:56:00 -
[179] - Quote
So getting a damage buff and a utility high is a nerf of the drake? I'm puzzled. Could it fit a DDD before and no one told me? |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2340
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 23:05:00 -
[180] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Like it or don't, and I'm a little PO'd myself, it still had to be done. Have a large alcoholic beverage to salute the "Days of Yore" and get over it.  Well obviously that's what we'll have to do because CCP is resolute to ruin Eve, but that doesn't mean we cannot complain about it as well -- despite what the HTFU crowd here on the forums thinks. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |