Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
644
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 02:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
Is the textual diarrhea known as "Tiericide"
Ship choice used to matter. Flying something like a Merlin or a Tristan or a Vexor took skill. Only people who knew what they were doing could do it properly in the face of the FotM. Now, all that ship variety we used to have has been reduced to a bunch of different reskins of the exact same ship - just orbit and hit F1. Literally the only "Choice" left is whether we want to hear lasers or projectile sounds.
Now, with Retribution 1.1, CCP nerfed some of the last two effective small gang PVP platforms left in the game: the Drake and the Hurricane. These ships had the right combination of tank and damage that a good pilot could pick off stragglers from a blob. The Cane's loss of a utility high means that it's now incapable of dealing with fast tackle, and the drake flies like a brick now.
And finally, as if the prior changes weren't enough, CCP is planning on nerfing offgrid links. Good luck trying to outmaneuver a blob now.
First off, Tiericide needs to be scaled back. Way back. Make ships interesting and unique again. Instead of making the Maller just a slower Omen, why not just boost its base armor HP to help it be better at the role it was supposed to fill?
Instead of nerfing the Drake and the Cane, bring up other battlecruisers to their level. Give the Harby a major agility buff and maybe we'll see more than two options for small gangs.
Lastly, instead of gutting boosts and making them pointless, give them some sig bloom so they can be scanned down.
Stop listening to your Goon overlords, CCP. Listen to your core small gang PVPers. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
14105
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 02:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Balance isn't always about buffing things, to match their OP counterparts. It can often mean more imbalance in other areas. Therefore a mixture of buffs and nerfs are ideal.
In other words HTFU.
Vote Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Hamatitio
Aperture Harmonics K162
94
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 02:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
I like what they've done so far, the drake and hurricane were good... A little too good. They stated in the dev blog that they couldn't bring all BCs to the level of the drake and hurricane, because that would make the cruisers they just finished balancing pointless again.
They needed to bring them down a little bit, and I'm personally glad they brought the other ones up.
When was the last time you saw a prophecy in game? And the myrmidon can now field 5 heavy / sentry drones, so its actually better than a vexor.
Tiericide is good for EVE, it brings more viable ships to the table, and from what I've seen opens up for a variety of fittings, and not the same old setups we've had for 3-4 years now. |

Bananna Phone
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 02:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
Whaaaaaaaaaa.....
Quit crying about your hurricane nerf and learn something new. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
474
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 02:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
lol
cane and drake were both ridiculously overpowered
there's actually a reason to use a different BC now
qqqqqqqq eve is hard |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air
3158
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 03:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
oh no i have to figure out more then two ships |

Abrazzar
855
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 03:09:00 -
[7] - Quote
I'd say individualizing them is a step that needs to come after equalling them out through tiericide. Else too much is done at the same time and things get confusing, mistakes are made and everything will take longer than when things are done in controlled iterations. Mining Overhaul Nothing changed since 2008. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3110
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 03:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kahega Amielden wrote:Is the textual diarrhea known as "Tiericide"
Ship choice used to matter. Flying something like a Merlin or a Tristan or a Vexor took skill. Only people who knew what they were doing could do it properly in the face of the FotM. Now, all that ship variety we used to have has been reduced to a bunch of different reskins of the exact same ship - just orbit and hit F1. Literally the only "Choice" left is whether we want to hear lasers or projectile sounds.
Now, with Retribution 1.1, CCP nerfed some of the last two effective small gang PVP platforms left in the game: the Drake and the Hurricane. These ships had the right combination of tank and damage that a good pilot could pick off stragglers from a blob. The Cane's loss of a utility high means that it's now incapable of dealing with fast tackle, and the drake flies like a brick now.
And finally, as if the prior changes weren't enough, CCP is planning on nerfing offgrid links. Good luck trying to outmaneuver a blob now.
First off, Tiericide needs to be scaled back. Way back. Make ships interesting and unique again. Instead of making the Maller just a slower Omen, why not just boost its base armor HP to help it be better at the role it was supposed to fill?
Instead of nerfing the Drake and the Cane, bring up other battlecruisers to their level. Give the Harby a major agility buff and maybe we'll see more than two options for small gangs.
Lastly, instead of gutting boosts and making them pointless, give them some sig bloom so they can be scanned down.
Stop listening to your Goon overlords, CCP. Listen to your core small gang PVPers.
So in your eyes the Stabber and Thorax fulfill the same role and thus are completely equivalent?
Interesting.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
934
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 03:27:00 -
[9] - Quote
As a drone user I got to listen to months of "HTFU" and "fly a Drake or Hurricane, noob" after we all got put out to pasture by the last patch.
Who's laughing now? EvE Forum Bingo |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1183
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 03:29:00 -
[10] - Quote
Posting in a stealth "I can't get easy kills anymore" thread. If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |

Irya Boone
TIPIAKS
201
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 03:30:00 -
[11] - Quote
PvP snipers , kitter tears .. are best tears
drake Should have been nerfed Long ago ? hurricane ... more nerf needed here don't really call pvp shout things 200km away
So no for OP
And big yes to what you are doing here CCP Improve C2 class WH More anos more signs ...RENAME null sec system With the name Of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It xill be awesome-á |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
581
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tiericide isn't causing me to fly "balanced" ships. It's leading me to fly more ships that have yet to be struck with revision, awaiting their ultimate mothballing of the old and the creation of the new. I haven't flown a BC since Retribution came out.
Actually, I lied. The vexor became bamf after retribution and I use it frequently for lawling. But for hunting WTs I take T3s or faction, because faction hasn't been hit with balance and I want to get the most out of my Loki prior to their own nerf/repurposing.
I imagine I'll cry a little, and then adapt when my faction ships finally get "balanced." If EVE is to last another 10 years, change has to happen. I just might drag my feet along the way.
As a side note, I like the suggestion of boosters having a signature bloom instead of being on grid. There needs to be an added stipulation that they cannot be in a POS to run their boosts though. I'm Denzel Washington. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2336
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
I'm going to go out on a limb here and agree with OP. It is absolutely unreasonable for the Drake to be nerfed multiple times. What do CCP think it is, a ****** titan?!
The Drake used to be the perfect balance for small gang PvP and now it is unusable. Couple that with the Tengu being kicked into obsolesence , and the Hurricane becoming a pile of you-know-what, I don't know how solo and small gang PvP will survive.
CCP needs to wake up. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
391
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:12:00 -
[14] - Quote
God, where is that annoying whine coming from?
*opens this thread*
Found it, it was the OP, and not a loose serpentine belt. For a second there I thought I would have to take the car into the shop. "I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

baltec1
Bat Country
5317
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:As a drone user I got to listen to months of "HTFU" and "fly a Drake or Hurricane, noob" after we all got put out to pasture by the last patch.
Who's laughing now? Me still. |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
581
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and agree with OP. It is absolutely unreasonable for the Drake to be nerfed multiple times. What do CCP think it is, a ****** titan?!
The Drake used to be the perfect balance for small gang PvP and now it is unusable. Couple that with the Tengu being kicked into obsolesence , and the Hurricane becoming a pile of you-know-what, I don't know how solo and small gang PvP will survive.
CCP needs to wake up. Don't nerf things that work well just becuase everything else sucks. Buff the things that suck! For example, like happened to frigates.
Why were the Drake, Tengu, and Hurricane the only small gang PvP ships?
BAZINGA. Trick question. Got you. They aren't the only small gang ships. Plenty of people run small gangs with other ships in their fleets as well.
I think part of the purpose behind balancing them is to remove the stigma that certain ships are the only ones to use for small gang/large gang/random gang warfare and to allow for a greater spread. I may not fly a hurricane since retribution (buffer armor canes are crap/less cool now) but I still fly ships. Adapt or give me your stuff?
I'm Denzel Washington. |

JC Anderson
Noir. Black Legion.
909
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
There is only one thing that the OP mentioned that I agree with. His idea about off grid boosting and bloom is actually kind of cool. Though I also agree with an added comment by somebody else that there needs to be a stipulation that the booster can't be taking refuge behind post shields. |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
581
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:As a drone user I got to listen to months of "HTFU" and "fly a Drake or Hurricane, noob" after we all got put out to pasture by the last patch.
Who's laughing now?
Who let the PVE'r in here? Why are you comparing apples to oranges? I'm Denzel Washington. |

Ckra Trald
Stellar Essence STELLAR CONSTELLATION
76
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:27:00 -
[19] - Quote
two ships get nerfed
all battle cruisers are worthless and im going to unsub We must embrace pain and use it to fuel our POS |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2336
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:33:00 -
[20] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and agree with OP. It is absolutely unreasonable for the Drake to be nerfed multiple times. What do CCP think it is, a ****** titan?!
The Drake used to be the perfect balance for small gang PvP and now it is unusable. Couple that with the Tengu being kicked into obsolesence , and the Hurricane becoming a pile of you-know-what, I don't know how solo and small gang PvP will survive.
CCP needs to wake up. Don't nerf things that work well just becuase everything else sucks. Buff the things that suck! For example, like happened to frigates. Why were the Drake, Tengu, and Hurricane the only small gang PvP ships? BAZINGA. Trick question. Got you. They aren't the only small gang ships. Plenty of people run small gangs with other ships in their fleets as well. I think part of the purpose behind balancing them is to remove the stigma that certain ships are the only ones to use for small gang/large gang/random gang warfare and to allow for a greater spread. I may not fly a hurricane since retribution (buffer armor canes are crap/less cool now) but I still fly ships. Adapt or give me your stuff? What are you going to small gang roam in? Feroxes? Please.
Don't make me go into the pile of garbage that passes for "working ships" these days. It's all "approach, push F1" or "orbit, push F1". Carebears might whine about PvE getting to be "more like" PvP, but it's really PvP that is turning into PvE. If you like these changes, you probably should just go run some level 4's. You'll find that fun. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Galenwade
Shrubbery Acquisitions
179
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:36:00 -
[21] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Posting in a stealth "I can't get easy kills anymore" thread.
It isn't very stealthy for a stealth thread |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
1520
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:39:00 -
[22] - Quote
thats why you shouldn't name your corp after a frig! a eve-style bounty system (done)-á dust boarding parties You fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

baltec1
Bat Country
5318
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:39:00 -
[23] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: What are you going to small gang roam in? Feroxes? Please.
Don't make me go into the pile of garbage that passes for "working ships" these days. It's all "approach, push F1" or "orbit, push F1". Carebears might whine about PvE getting to be "more like" PvP, but it's really PvP that is turning into PvE. If you like these changes, you probably should just go run some level 4's. You'll find that fun.
Please do this the next time you see me, it makes my life so much easyer when ships fly directly at my large blasters. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1183
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:39:00 -
[24] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:It's all "approach, push F1" or "orbit, push F1". I'm pretty sure a guy pushed "keep at range, F1" on me one time, maybe you guys could try that for variety. If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1183
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:41:00 -
[25] - Quote
Galenwade wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:Posting in a stealth "I can't get easy kills anymore" thread. It isn't very stealthy for a stealth thread I wasn't sure if it was a "DONT NERF MY FOTM BRO" thread, so I went with that one. If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |

Mariner6
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
107
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:42:00 -
[26] - Quote
Hamatitio wrote:I like what they've done so far, the drake and hurricane were good... A little too good. They stated in the dev blog that they couldn't bring all BCs to the level of the drake and hurricane, because that would make the cruisers they just finished balancing pointless again.
They needed to bring them down a little bit, and I'm personally glad they brought the other ones up.
When was the last time you saw a prophecy in game? And the myrmidon can now field 5 heavy / sentry drones, so its actually better than a vexor.
Tiericide is good for EVE, it brings more viable ships to the table, and from what I've seen opens up for a variety of fittings, and not the same old setups we've had for 3-4 years now.
Actually, 4 heavy/sentry drones. A fully over buffer armor tanked Mrym doubles the EHP of a Vexor but with ION blasters still has only slightly higher DPS as the guns are unbonused, and that's only with the 4 heavies. If your dealing with frigs or cruisers and have a full flight of medium/light drones out the Vexor may actually out perform the armor tanked Mrym. Of course the real difference becomes the Vex is faster AND much lower sig radius. But anyways, its splitting hairs and there are many nuances between cruiser and BC that the comparison is somewhat pointless. But the bottom line is that the Vexor is a VERY good cruiser. The Mrym is an ok BC, and frankly after this patch I find it worse off especially next to the Prophecy. |

Apocryphal Noise
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:44:00 -
[27] - Quote
honestly it sounds like you don't know what you're talking about |

Mr Ignitious
Red Federation
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:46:00 -
[28] - Quote
Hamatitio wrote:I like what they've done so far, the drake and hurricane were good... A little too good. They stated in the dev blog that they couldn't bring all BCs to the level of the drake and hurricane, because that would make the cruisers they just finished balancing pointless again.
They needed to bring them down a little bit, and I'm personally glad they brought the other ones up.
When was the last time you saw a prophecy in game? And the myrmidon can now field 5 heavy / sentry drones, so its actually better than a vexor.
Tiericide is good for EVE, it brings more viable ships to the table, and from what I've seen opens up for a variety of fittings, and not the same old setups we've had for 3-4 years now.
Myrm actually has 100mbit, vs 75mbit of the vexor, where you need 125mbit for 5 heavies.
And as for the op, you're high. The drake was a good solo pvp ship because it was nimble and tanky and had good damage? Guess what, it's also the most flown for large blobs for the same reason. Drake fleets were ruining **** everywhere. The hurricane obsoleted the rupture.
As for having no options, then you're very narrow minded. Think about what you want to be doing. Are you going to be fighting lots of little ships? Then you might want to invest in a tankier bc like the myrm or brutix. Fighting a heavier ship with poor damage projection? Get a hurricane or a cylone to kite them. Need good damage projection and decent tank to prevent getting kited? Get a drake or perhaps a harbinger.
What CCP did is allow the bc's to each excel in a role or two so that ALL the bc's could be viable in some way. You aren't going to kite anyone with a brutix, so it's not stepping on the hurricanes toes.
What you want is a wtfsolopwnmobile to run around in that can engage whatever you encounter. That's not a good thing to have in a game, so now you need to pick what you want to do and then select the proper tool for the job. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:50:00 -
[29] - Quote
Okay so if everything is so good, tell me: how would you handle a blob if you're solo or in a small gang (5-10 people or less). Oh and don't say "bring links" because CCP are about to nerf those too as part of their crusade to buff the goon blob. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
277
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:51:00 -
[30] - Quote
TL;DR of OPs post:
"Boo Hoo! I now have to think about how these other viable PvP ships might be fit, instead of the four or five cookie cutter fits that were viable for PvP before."
You've got to remember that these are just simple miners. These are people of the land. The common clay of New Eden. You know... morons. |

Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
645
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:54:00 -
[31] - Quote
Quote:"Boo Hoo! I now have to think about how these other viable PvP ships might be fit, instead of the four or five cookie cutter fits that were viable for PvP before."
More like,
"I need to make a reddit account and join TEST" |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
758
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 04:54:00 -
[32] - Quote
Dude. My favored Drake build just gained almost 50% increase in DPS, whilst sustaining marginal EHP and Velocity hits. Even after dropping my humorously expensive BCS units and replacing them with T2s, I'm still punching north of 600 DPS without the drones. With the drones, I'm punching north of 700 DPS, and my skills are NOT maxed!
I'll grant that this is not a small-gang PvP build (C2 solo build), but I expect similar effects elsewhere.
Far as I'm concerned, this update is awesomesauce.  Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

JC Anderson
Noir. Black Legion.
910
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 05:10:00 -
[33] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote: What are you going to small gang roam in? Feroxes? Please.
Don't make me go into the pile of garbage that passes for "working ships" these days. It's all "approach, push F1" or "orbit, push F1". Carebears might whine about PvE getting to be "more like" PvP, but it's really PvP that is turning into PvE. If you like these changes, you probably should just go run some level 4's. You'll find that fun.
Please do this the next time you see me, it makes my life so much easyer when ships fly directly at my large blasters.
Most people don't seem to realize that manually flying in a spiral to close in on an enemy will bring you much better chances of success han using the keep at range and orbit buttons. ;)
Eh, unless everybody is shooting missiles at you. |

Mr Ignitious
Red Federation
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 05:14:00 -
[34] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Okay so if everything is so good, tell me: how would you handle a blob if you're solo or in a small gang (5-10 people or less). Oh and don't say "bring links" because CCP are about to nerf those too as part of their crusade to buff the goon blob.
If there was a way for 5 people with all lvl 5 skills to beat 40 people with all lvl 5 skills, all of them in similar ships, then there is something wrong with this game. I hate blobs as much as the next guy, but it's literally impossible to make what you just said happen.
I bet you don't understand, because like the op, you're too thick to understand - So I'll spell it out for you.
Group A: 5 people, flying ship A Group B: 40 people, flying ships B-F
Group A smokes Group B, no losses on Group A's side, Group B just couldn't catch Group A, and Group A had too much damage for them to tank.
Group A and B meet up again except this time the fleets look like this: Group A: 5 people, flying ship A Group B: 40 people, all flying Ship A.
Guess what, Group A gets ******.
What we have now are ships that excel in different areas - Ships that will perform in large numbers but struggle on their own, ships that will do well in solo or small groups, but won't shine in larger numbers. The variety is more unique than this, but at least now you can choose what you want to do and not sit down and say: HMMM its a fleet huh? Better grab my drake. HMMM I'm bored and want to hunt some nubs, better grab my hurricane. |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
758
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 05:15:00 -
[35] - Quote
JC Anderson wrote:baltec1 wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote: What are you going to small gang roam in? Feroxes? Please.
Don't make me go into the pile of garbage that passes for "working ships" these days. It's all "approach, push F1" or "orbit, push F1". Carebears might whine about PvE getting to be "more like" PvP, but it's really PvP that is turning into PvE. If you like these changes, you probably should just go run some level 4's. You'll find that fun.
Please do this the next time you see me, it makes my life so much easyer when ships fly directly at my large blasters. Most people don't seem to realize that manually flying in a spiral to close in on an enemy will bring you much better chances of success han using the keep at range and orbit buttons. ;) Eh, unless everybody is shooting missiles at you. Fast enough approach, and unless it's an overwhelming barrage of rockets, you're good to go.
Frankly, my favored Drake build requires quite a bit of management, because HAMs don't have all that much standoff. Don't mind the management - Being willing to 'mind the store' means a lot more DPS to throw. And if I have to pop my drones in and out like so many yo-yos, well, again, it's worth it.
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Arronicus
Vintas Industries Mistakes Were Made.
230
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 05:19:00 -
[36] - Quote
Trying to reply... having trouble thinking over the sound of OP's crying.
Tiericide made the Merlin, Slasher, Condor, Incursus, Punisher, and a variety of other frigates decent and now highly used pvp frigs. Tiericide made the Caracal a beastly killing machine, buffed the thorax, made the stabber better, and made some pretty freaking badass support cruisers Tiericide Improved the drake's dps, improved the harbinger's dps, took the hurricane down a slight notch to not be the king of small gang pvp go-to ship, and improved the myrmidon's practical dps Tiercide buffed the brutix and ferox heavily, changed the prophecy into something WORTH FLYING, and gave the cyclone a nice spin.
An unimaginable world of good has come from this, for pvpers. Buffs, buffs, and more buffs, with a couple tiny adjustments in a few small cases, in favor of balance. Pretty clear to me OP has Battlecruisers trained to 2 or 3 and is mad that his hurricane/drake isn't OMGWTFPWN everything now. |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
1520
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 05:57:00 -
[37] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Okay so if everything is so good, tell me: how would you handle a blob if you're solo or in a small gang (5-10 people or less). Oh and don't say "bring links" because CCP are about to nerf those too as part of their crusade to buff the goon blob. why do you believe you should be able to fight a blob solo? a eve-style bounty system (done)-á dust boarding parties You fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
245
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 06:06:00 -
[38] - Quote
Quote:Tiericide made the Caracal a beastly killing machine, buffed the thorax, made the stabber better, and made some pretty freaking badass support cruisers Tiericide Improved the drake's dps, improved the harbinger's dps, took the hurricane down a slight notch to not be the king of small gang pvp go-to ship, and improved the myrmidon's practical dps lol. ccp buffed scrub ships like t1 firgates and cruisers cause blobbers are afraid to fly something that costs more than a few million iskies. why would you even fly a bc or hac now that cruisers are just as good and cost halve or tenth as much. meanwhile, their going to nerf real pvp ships like t3s because scrubs dont have the balls to field something worth that much so they whine intil ccp does something about it.
o7m8s enjoy ur carebear pvp. |

Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
646
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 06:09:00 -
[39] - Quote
Bienator II wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Okay so if everything is so good, tell me: how would you handle a blob if you're solo or in a small gang (5-10 people or less). Oh and don't say "bring links" because CCP are about to nerf those too as part of their crusade to buff the goon blob. why do you believe you should be able to fight a blob solo?
Because skill should mean more than numbers. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5325
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 06:25:00 -
[40] - Quote
Kahega Amielden wrote: Because skill should mean more than numbers.
Not when outnumbered ten to one. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6900
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 06:35:00 -
[41] - Quote
hold on hold on hold on I have the PERFECT quote for this thread ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6900
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 06:36:00 -
[42] - Quote
Akirei Scytale wrote::David Attenborough:
And here, we see the FOTM kiddie in its natural habitat, the forums. This one has just lost his ability to hunt with impunity, never needing to rely on his wit nor his skill. Having grown soft when he could hunt with ease, he has realized that he may struggle to hunt, now that he is on a level playing field with the rest of the jungle. His response, as you can see, is to pull out his hair and gnash at the shadows, occasionally screaming gibberish. He may not survive the winter. ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

dark heartt
Space Truckers Assoc
18
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 07:23:00 -
[43] - Quote
When frigates went through their tericide, I saw a distinct influx of people who were flying frigates you really never saw before. Now we will see the same thing with BC's because for the most part I really saw Drakes and Canes in PVP. Now we can expect to see a lot of other ships being flown and being reasonably equal. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 07:40:00 -
[44] - Quote
I can't believe you guys. Did all the real PvPers leave when I wasn't looking, just to be replaced by blobbing braindead goons?
I should just unsub, this game is starting to not be worth it anymore. I'm not paying to be part of a super carebear noob haven of people who like to pretend they "PvP". Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Dante Uisen
Push button receive bacon
106
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 07:48:00 -
[45] - Quote
Kahega Amielden wrote:Listen to your core small gang PVPers.
9 out of 10 times small gang PVPers is just another way of saying gate campers, gate camping is not really a concept that game balance should be centered around.
If you take something like factional warfare where you have a lot of 1 vs. 1 fights, you will see that people are flying all the T1 frigs, dessies and cruisers now, and there are a lot of different play styles and tactics being used. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6903
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 07:48:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ignoring the fact that you resorted to argumentum ad goonum, let me make an attempt to address your concern re: the sky falling because CCP apparently doesn't agree with your idea that only a handful of ships in the game should be useful.
In the past, a newbie would need to spend months training in order to get into a ship worth a damn. There was a massive gap between T1 and T2 hulls, the most glaring one being between T1 support and T2 logistics. Flying a Merlin, Tristan or Vexor effectively did not only take skill, it took the amount of specialized training required to fly their T2 counterparts. Those ships are now worth flying on their own merits and not just in gimmicky gang compositions.
CCP came to a realization in mid-2011 that bankruptcy was a Bad Thing and that the "**** you, you're utterly useless for your first six months and still crap for your first two years" approach to game design was driving away more players than they could afford. This, compounded with the fact that their game is 10 years old and has been losing many core players who move on with their lives to careers and marriages, means that it is important to increase player retention without abandoning the core principles of the game. This is not WoW, where your first few months are spent exclusively in the forests grinding to level 90 or whatever the cap is nowadays. This is EVE, where every ship can present a larger-than-obvious threat.
I'm sorry that your orca swapping was nerfed and that you're apparently getting taken to the ownzone by 2 month old players in T1 cruisers, but the blame does not lie with whatever external entity you attribute your own failures to. ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
585
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 07:49:00 -
[47] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Did all the real PvPers leave when I wasn't looking, just to be replaced by blobbing braindead goons?
Calling me a Goon is probably an insult to the goons. I'm Denzel Washington. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5329
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 07:54:00 -
[48] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Did all the real PvPers leave when I wasn't looking, just to be replaced by blobbing braindead goons? Calling me a Goon is probably an insult to the goons.
Don't worry we are used to being insulted by the wretches of high sec. |

Revajin
15 Minute Outliers Novus Dominatum
79
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:00:00 -
[49] - Quote
Confirming the Drake and Cane are still mad op. Thread is pointless. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:02:00 -
[50] - Quote
Ugh don't even remind me of the plague of T1 logistics everywhere. Their affordability and easy availability has made them the new "win button" for PvP. They can be fit up for higher sensor strength and almost the same reps as their T2 counterparts, but can appear in ridiculous numbers.
It used to be that a small gang of smart (read: actually skilled) pilots could maneuver around a larger gang, pick off stragglers, etc. To counter this, gangs could go the extra mile and effort (plus risk) of bringing in ewar or logi support -- especially the latter. Now, with the ubiquity of both of these in large numbers of T1 ships, what can the small gang do? Bring their own logi? Their own ewar? More numbers? ... OH WAIT, THAT'S RIGHT! The only counter to a blob is a bigger blob! No skill involved.
Andski wrote:I'm sorry that your orca swapping was nerfed and that you're apparently getting taken to the ownzone by 2 month old players in T1 cruisers, but the blame does not lie with whatever external entity you attribute your own failures to.
I have no idea where you're pulling this false crap out of. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Xanthe Kado
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:04:00 -
[51] - Quote
Posting in a we should've named ourselves Whinerlings thread. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6908
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:14:00 -
[52] - Quote
You know how I'd approach bringing up the topic of overbuffed T1 logistics for discussion? It doesn't involve ranting and accusing CCP of working for Goonswarm. Unless you honestly believe that we've ever had problems fielding dozens of T2 logis in our fleets (hint: we don't) or reimbursing them (hint: we most definitely don't) ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:16:00 -
[53] - Quote
Andski wrote:You know how I'd approach bringing up the topic of overbuffed T1 logistics for discussion? It doesn't involve ranting and accusing CCP of working for Goonswarm. Unless you honestly believe that we've ever had problems fielding dozens of T2 logis in our fleets (hint: we don't) or reimbursing them (hint: we most definitely don't) Of course you don't, knowing the depth of your lined pockets. But that's an issue for another thread. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3116
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:22:00 -
[54] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Okay so if everything is so good, tell me: how would you handle a blob if you're solo or in a small gang (5-10 people or less). Oh and don't say "bring links" because CCP are about to nerf those too as part of their crusade to buff the goon blob.
What kind of blob are we talking about? You can't just say "blah blah blah blah" and get a meaningful response. A blob of supers? A blob of caps? A BC blob? How big a BC blob?
-Liang
Ed: Also, Petrus... this thread is most unlike you guys. Seriously, it's just ******* stupid. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2017
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:23:00 -
[55] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Ugh don't even remind me of the plague of T1 logistics everywhere. Their affordability and easy availability has made them the new "win button" for PvP. They can be fit up for higher sensor strength and almost the same reps as their T2 counterparts, but can appear in ridiculous numbers.
It used to be that a small gang of smart (read: actually skilled) pilots could maneuver around a larger gang, pick off stragglers, etc. To counter this, gangs could go the extra mile and effort (plus risk) of bringing in ewar or logi support -- especially the latter. Now, with the ubiquity of both of these in large numbers of T1 ships, what can the small gang do? Bring their own logi? Their own ewar? More numbers? ... OH WAIT, THAT'S RIGHT! The only counter to a blob is a bigger blob! No skill involved.
You know, these kind of changes reveal the pilots who didn't have the skills or smarts to win, but relied on OP equipment to get kills.
It's quite sad, you ruined the reputation of Rifterlings in one single thread of really stupid posts.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2017
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:25:00 -
[56] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote: lol. ccp buffed scrub ships like t1 firgates and cruisers cause blobbers are afraid to fly something that costs more than a few million iskies. why would you even fly a bc or hac now that cruisers are just as good and cost halve or tenth as much. meanwhile, their going to nerf real pvp ships like t3s because scrubs dont have the balls to field something worth that much so they whine intil ccp does something about it.
o7m8s enjoy ur carebear pvp.
You don't have any kills in T3s, you only fly scrub ships.
07m8s enjoy your trolling, scrub.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:35:00 -
[57] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Ed: Also, Petrus... this thread is most unlike you guys. Seriously, it's just ******* stupid. Sigh... I guess you simply never noticed how much I loved flying my Drake. Those days are gone, now, of course. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Cass Lie
State War Academy Caldari State
62
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:37:00 -
[58] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Ugh don't even remind me of the plague of T1 logistics everywhere. Their affordability and easy availability has made them the new "win button" for PvP. They can be fit up for higher sensor strength and almost the same reps as their T2 counterparts, but can appear in ridiculous numbers. It used to be that a small gang of smart (read: actually skilled) pilots could maneuver around a larger gang, pick off stragglers, etc. To counter this, gangs could go the extra mile and effort (plus risk) of bringing in ewar or logi support -- especially the latter. Now, with the ubiquity of both of these in large numbers of T1 ships, what can the small gang do? Bring their own logi? Their own ewar? More numbers? ... OH WAIT, THAT'S RIGHT! The only counter to a blob is a bigger blob! No skill involved. Andski wrote:I'm sorry that your orca swapping was nerfed and that you're apparently getting taken to the ownzone by 2 month old players in T1 cruisers, but the blame does not lie with whatever external entity you attribute your own failures to. I have no idea where you're pulling this false crap out of.
So, in your definition, skill = more SP and more expensive toys to play with. Mind boggles. Riddle me this. If you are actually skilled, how come you can't come on top even when the the gear on both sides becomes more even?
|

Deathan Taxxis
The Scope Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:42:00 -
[59] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:I can't believe you guys. Did all the real PvPers leave when I wasn't looking, just to be replaced by blobbing braindead goons?
I should just unsub, this game is starting to not be worth it anymore. I'm not paying to be part of a super carebear noob haven of people who like to pretend they "PvP".
You're probably right, you should unsub.
As you're one of the clearly '1337 pvpers' you must have quite a lot of stuff?
Can I have it? |

Dante Uisen
Push button receive bacon
107
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:42:00 -
[60] - Quote
We start with
Kahega Amielden wrote:Ship choice used to matter. Flying something like a Merlin or a Tristan or a Vexor took skill. Only people who knew what they were doing could do it properly in the face of the FotM.
now we have
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Sigh... I guess you simply never noticed how much I loved flying my Drake. Those days are gone, now, of course.
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3119
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:42:00 -
[61] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Ed: Also, Petrus... this thread is most unlike you guys. Seriously, it's just ******* stupid. Sigh... I guess you simply never noticed how much I loved flying my Drake. Those days are gone, now, of course.
I'm pretty sure that no amount of Drake love can excuse the random crap you guys are spewing all up in this thread. But while we're on the topic: why can't you use the Drake now? I'm seeing it being 20m/s slower with the same tank and more DPS. What's the problem?
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries
127
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:46:00 -
[62] - Quote
Kahega Amielden wrote:Is the textual diarrhea known as "Tiericide"
Ship choice used to matter. Flying something like a Merlin or a Tristan or a Vexor took skill. Only people who knew what they were doing could do it properly in the face of the FotM. Now, all that ship variety we used to have has been reduced to a bunch of different reskins of the exact same ship - just orbit and hit F1. Literally the only "Choice" left is whether we want to hear lasers or projectile sounds.
I'm slightly sympathetic, despite the hyperbole. Skillful pilotting of a ship which conventional wisdom says is poor is a great thing for getting people to engage you in solo and small gang PvP and with the improvements in so many ships there are fewer such niche ships. However with so many more "good" ships there should be more people who are confident enough in their own ship to take a few risks - The two sides of the equation don't quite balance but I don't think it's exactly dire...
Kahega Amielden wrote:Now, with Retribution 1.1, CCP nerfed some of the last two effective small gang PVP platforms left in the game: the Drake and the Hurricane. These ships had the right combination of tank and damage that a good pilot could pick off stragglers from a blob. The Cane's loss of a utility high means that it's now incapable of dealing with fast tackle, and the drake flies like a brick now.
And finally, as if the prior changes weren't enough, CCP is planning on nerfing offgrid links. Good luck trying to outmaneuver a blob now.
Wait... what??? I thought this was a thread about player skill, getting fights and the underdog over the FotM... |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3119
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:50:00 -
[63] - Quote
Jacob Holland wrote:Kahega Amielden wrote:Is the textual diarrhea known as "Tiericide"
Ship choice used to matter. Flying something like a Merlin or a Tristan or a Vexor took skill. Only people who knew what they were doing could do it properly in the face of the FotM. Now, all that ship variety we used to have has been reduced to a bunch of different reskins of the exact same ship - just orbit and hit F1. Literally the only "Choice" left is whether we want to hear lasers or projectile sounds. I'm slightly sympathetic, despite the hyperbole. Skillful pilotting of a ship which conventional wisdom says is poor is a great thing for getting people to engage you in solo and small gang PvP and with the improvements in so many ships there are fewer such niche ships. However with so many more "good" ships there should be more people who are confident enough in their own ship to take a few risks - The two sides of the equation don't quite balance but I don't think it's exactly dire... Kahega Amielden wrote:Now, with Retribution 1.1, CCP nerfed some of the last two effective small gang PVP platforms left in the game: the Drake and the Hurricane. These ships had the right combination of tank and damage that a good pilot could pick off stragglers from a blob. The Cane's loss of a utility high means that it's now incapable of dealing with fast tackle, and the drake flies like a brick now.
And finally, as if the prior changes weren't enough, CCP is planning on nerfing offgrid links. Good luck trying to outmaneuver a blob now. Wait... what??? I thought this was a thread about player skill, getting fights and the underdog over the FotM...
That was you not reading his original post. The Merlin and Vexor were always strong ships and have consistently been rated in the "top 3" of their ship class... well, since forever.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:55:00 -
[64] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Ed: Also, Petrus... this thread is most unlike you guys. Seriously, it's just ******* stupid. Sigh... I guess you simply never noticed how much I loved flying my Drake. Those days are gone, now, of course. I'm pretty sure that no amount of Drake love can excuse the random crap you guys are spewing all up in this thread. But while we're on the topic: why can't you use the Drake now? I'm seeing it being 20m/s slower with the same tank and more DPS. What's the problem? -Liang I'm not sure how you're getting the "same tank" since the Drake got a flat out reduction to its base HP. It is also not only slower but less agile (more massive) and thus far more poorly suited for small gang PvP. On top of that, the "higher damage" claim is only applicable if you use HAMs, which is an exceptionally bad idea when fighting outnumbered, as it means you are probably close enough to not have any route of escape, and will likely just die an embarassing death. HMLs on the Drake are now worthless. Not only do they do significantly less damage, but the "buff" that Fury missiles received also made them be as bad at hitting things as torpedoes are, cutting off the only way to get even close to the same performance.
So, yeah, i'm really enjoying this "buffed" Drake. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
369
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:58:00 -
[65] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Ed: Also, Petrus... this thread is most unlike you guys. Seriously, it's just ******* stupid. Sigh... I guess you simply never noticed how much I loved flying my Drake. Those days are gone, now, of course. I'm pretty sure that no amount of Drake love can excuse the random crap you guys are spewing all up in this thread. But while we're on the topic: why can't you use the Drake now? I'm seeing it being 20m/s slower with the same tank and more DPS. What's the problem? -Liang I'm not sure how you're getting the "same tank" since the Drake got a flat out reduction to its base HP. It is also not only slower but less agile (more massive) and thus far more poorly suited for small gang PvP. On top of that, the "higher damage" claim is only applicable if you use HAMs, which is an exceptionally bad idea when fighting outnumbered, as it means you are probably close enough to not have any route of escape, and will likely just die an embarassing death. HMLs on the Drake are now worthless. Not only do they do significantly less damage, but the "buff" that Fury missiles received also made them be as bad at hitting things as torpedoes are, cutting off the only way to get even close to the same performance. So, yeah, i'm really enjoying this "buffed" Drake. You still get almost double the EHP of any other shield BC and the same DPS. How people can whine about that is beyond me |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 08:58:00 -
[66] - Quote
Also, to the naysayers who think I'm talking out of you-know-where, I encourage you to check my killboard stats to see why I am so disappointed that my favorite ships have been ruined. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3119
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:02:00 -
[67] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: I'm not sure how you're getting the "same tank" since the Drake got a flat out reduction to its base HP. It is also not only slower but less agile (more massive) and thus far more poorly suited for small gang PvP. On top of that, the "higher damage" claim is only applicable if you use HAMs, which is an exceptionally bad idea when fighting outnumbered, as it means you are probably close enough to not have any route of escape, and will likely just die an embarassing death. HMLs on the Drake are now worthless. Not only do they do significantly less damage, but the "buff" that Fury missiles received also made them be as bad at hitting things as torpedoes are, cutting off the only way to get even close to the same performance.
So, yeah, i'm really enjoying this "buffed" Drake.
This was my old solo PVP Drake: [Drake, Solo PVP HAM Drake] Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Damage Control II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Warp Scrambler II Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Small Unstable Power Fluctuator I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Warrior II x5
Stats: - 80318 EHP - 599 DPS - 1038 m/s - 11.2 sec align
I loaded up the new EFT and made a couple of tweaks: [Drake, Solo PVP HAM Drake] Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Damage Control II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Large Shield Extender II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Warp Scrambler II Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile [empty high slot]
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Warrior II x5
Stats: - 79606 EHP - 614 DPS - 1003 m/s - 11.9 sec align
So the stat differences: - EHP: <1% Nerf - DPS: 2.5% Buff (Also, you can now overheat longer yielding even more *real* DPS) - Speed: 3.5% Nerf - Agility: 6% Nerf
Sorry, not seeing the cause for QQ. Maybe you had a different fit that was negatively affected?
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
369
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:08:00 -
[68] - Quote
Liang. Wat are yu doing? Liang. Stahp!
You are ruining his reason to whine over nothing! |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
206
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:20:00 -
[69] - Quote
What I don't get is they nerfed the dual neut cane into the ground because it was "unbalanced" then tweaked the cyclone so it can do 600dps with dual neuts with plenty of mobility and serviceable tank (and in the hands of the right pilot will utterly destroy a cane 1v1 due to being able to apply full dps from enough range the cane is losing dps to falloff)... really don't see the need to nerf the cane down as far as they have. Seems to have been put down like a rabid dog as if someone has a personal issue with it rather than anything else. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:21:00 -
[70] - Quote
Rroff wrote:What I don't get is they nerfed the dual neut cane into the ground because it was "unbalanced" then tweaked the cyclone so it can do 600dps with dual neuts with plenty of mobility and serviceable tank (and in the hands of the right pilot will utterly destroy a cane 1v1 due to being able to apply full dps from enough range the cane is losing dps to falloff)... really don't see the need to nerf the cane down as far as they have. It's called "Retribution" for a reason...  Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:24:00 -
[71] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:-- HAM Drake -- Remember how I said it's all "Approach, F1" nowadays? Yeah... Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
206
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:25:00 -
[72] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Rroff wrote:What I don't get is they nerfed the dual neut cane into the ground because it was "unbalanced" then tweaked the cyclone so it can do 600dps with dual neuts with plenty of mobility and serviceable tank (and in the hands of the right pilot will utterly destroy a cane 1v1 due to being able to apply full dps from enough range the cane is losing dps to falloff)... really don't see the need to nerf the cane down as far as they have. It's called "Retribution" for a reason... 
I just wonder if they realise what they've done to the cyclone given the rhetoric used to justify nerfing the cane when the new cyclone can be fitted out in the exact way that rhetoric was aimed at. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:26:00 -
[73] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Rroff wrote:What I don't get is they nerfed the dual neut cane into the ground because it was "unbalanced" then tweaked the cyclone so it can do 600dps with dual neuts with plenty of mobility and serviceable tank (and in the hands of the right pilot will utterly destroy a cane 1v1 due to being able to apply full dps from enough range the cane is losing dps to falloff)... really don't see the need to nerf the cane down as far as they have. It's called "Retribution" for a reason... 
The Cane is still a fine BC. I think people just forgot that every other ship in the game requires these crazy things called "fittings skills" and more intelligence "put on biggest of everything". The Cane is still superior to the Cyclone for a lot of things, and still worse for others. It's almost like there's a reason to fly something other than The Almighty Cane and The Almighty Drake.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:27:00 -
[74] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:-- HAM Drake -- Remember how I said it's all "Approach, F1" nowadays? Yeah...
Remember how I said that I looked at the Nano Drake and about a dozen fits and they all had the same song and dance? Yeah...
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:28:00 -
[75] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Rroff wrote:What I don't get is they nerfed the dual neut cane into the ground because it was "unbalanced" then tweaked the cyclone so it can do 600dps with dual neuts with plenty of mobility and serviceable tank (and in the hands of the right pilot will utterly destroy a cane 1v1 due to being able to apply full dps from enough range the cane is losing dps to falloff)... really don't see the need to nerf the cane down as far as they have. It's called "Retribution" for a reason...  I just wonder if they realise what they've done to the cyclone given the rhetoric used to justify nerfing the cane when the new cyclone can be fitted out in the exact way that rhetoric was aimed at.
I just wonder if you realize how stupid you look, or if you're gonna wake up in the morning with that "Whoa, what the **** did I do last night?!" feeling.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:35:00 -
[76] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:
I just wonder if you realize how stupid you look, or if you're gonna wake up in the morning with that "Whoa, what the **** did I do last night?!" feeling.
-Liang
There was very specific comments made about the cane hinting towards a fitting doctrine that was supposedly over powered for a BC regardless of tier, etc. and used to justify the need to put it in its place... but post patch the cyclone can be made to fit the very role they were claiming was the reason for putting the cane down. I find it a bit confusing. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:35:00 -
[77] - Quote
I wonder what's going to be "OP" next. Ooh, ooh! Maybe the Abaddon will lose its tank bonus for one of those useless cap usage bonuses. We already know the Typhoon is getting turned into an "Approach, F1" brick that takes no skill to fly. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:39:00 -
[78] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:I wonder what's going to be "OP" next. Ooh, ooh! Maybe the Abaddon will lose its tank bonus for one of those useless cap usage bonuses. We already know the Typhoon is getting turned into an "Approach, F1" brick that takes no skill to fly.
You seem to have this dramatic aversion to all things missile. So, tell us about this non-F1 Drake fit you had.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:39:00 -
[79] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:
I just wonder if you realize how stupid you look, or if you're gonna wake up in the morning with that "Whoa, what the **** did I do last night?!" feeling.
-Liang
There was very specific comments made about the cane hinting towards a fitting doctrine that was supposedly over powered for a BC regardless of tier, etc. and used to justify the need to put it in its place... but post patch the cyclone can be made to fit (which it couldn't before) the very role they were claiming was the reason for putting the cane down. I find it a bit confusing.
It's ok hun. It'll all be ok and better in the morning dearie.
/pat pat
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Dante Uisen
Push button receive bacon
110
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:42:00 -
[80] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:You seem to have this dramatic aversion to all things missile. So, tell us about this non-F1 Drake fit you had.
You group the launchers on F2 |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:42:00 -
[81] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote: It's ok hun. It'll all be ok and better in the morning dearie.
/pat pat
-Liang
Can only assume your completely missing the point of what I'm saying as the responses aren't in any way an appropriate one. If you actually have something useful to contribute say it. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:46:00 -
[82] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Can only assume your completely missing the point of what I'm saying as the responses aren't in any way an appropriate one.
The two ships are so dissimilar as to be quite astounding. The Cane is a gun ship with all of the advantages that it brings. The dual neutralizer setups were quite hard on close range frigates, but were otherwise mostly useless. Notably, if you were in range to be using the neutralizers you were dealing ~700-800 DPS. On the flip side, the Cyclone tops out at about 500 DPS @ 15km and has terrible projection against frigates.
The two are worlds apart.
-Liang
Ed: Now that I've showed you how you're a complete ******* ******, do you want to stop poasting about how stupid you are? That'd be great. Thanks in advance. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:48:00 -
[83] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Rroff wrote:Can only assume your completely missing the point of what I'm saying as the responses aren't in any way an appropriate one. The two ships are so dissimilar as to be quite astounding. The Cane is a gun ship with all of the advantages that it brings. The dual neutralizer setups were quite hard on close range frigates, but were otherwise mostly useless. Notably, if you were in range to be using the neutralizers you were dealing ~700-800 DPS. On the flip side, the Cyclone tops out at about 500 DPS @ 15km and has terrible projection against frigates. The two are worlds apart. -Liang Ed: Now that I've showed you how you're a complete ******* ******, do you want to stop poasting about how stupid you are? That'd be great. Thanks in advance.
As I thought your missing the point of what I'm saying. I'm saying its possible to fit the cyclone to do just that - apply around 600dps and dual neuts against stuff including small ships with the new changes - as I said I'm guessing CCP has overlooked what I'm talking about as it makes no sense in comparison to the rhetoric used to change the cane.
EDIT: (OK it doesn't apply damage quite as effectively against small stuff as the cane used to be able to do with dual webs but its not so hideously behind it that it makes much odds in actual gameplay).
EDIT2: Beside the rhetoric wasn't used about its ability to hit small frigs infact that ability is unchanged with the current cane setup. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:49:00 -
[84] - Quote
Please show me this dual neut fit that applies 600 DPS to small ships.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:52:00 -
[85] - Quote
Rroff wrote: EDIT: (OK it doesn't apply damage quite as effectively against small stuff as the cane used to be able to do with dual webs but its not so hideously behind it that it makes much odds in actual gameplay).
You bring this dual neut Cyclone to Amamake and I'll fight you in a frigate. You won't leave alive.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:57:00 -
[86] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Rroff wrote: EDIT: (OK it doesn't apply damage quite as effectively against small stuff as the cane used to be able to do with dual webs but its not so hideously behind it that it makes much odds in actual gameplay).
You bring this dual neut Cyclone to Amamake and I'll fight you in a frigate. You won't leave alive. -Liang
Oh I'm pretty sure I wouldn't leave alive but probably not due to your frig (alone)...
Besides its not the main point of what I'm saying - the cane even post nerf can still do dual web, single neut + turret dps against frigs plenty effectively that wasn't the role that it was getting savaged for. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3121
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:59:00 -
[87] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Oh I'm pretty sure I wouldn't leave alive but probably not due to your frig (alone)...
Hardly the first BC I'd solo in a frigate. But maybe we're starting to talk about that dreaded "skill" thing the OP mentions but seems to lack. :)
Quote:Besides its not the main point of what I'm saying - the cane even post nerf can still do dual web, single neut + turret dps against frigs plenty effectively that wasn't the role that it was getting savaged for.
So... the Cane is fine now and the Cyclone can't fulfill the role the dual neut Cane did before. Oh... uh, cool. Guess the game designers did know what they were doing afterall.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Arronicus
Vintas Industries Mistakes Were Made.
235
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:05:00 -
[88] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote:Quote:Tiericide made the Caracal a beastly killing machine, buffed the thorax, made the stabber better, and made some pretty freaking badass support cruisers Tiericide Improved the drake's dps, improved the harbinger's dps, took the hurricane down a slight notch to not be the king of small gang pvp go-to ship, and improved the myrmidon's practical dps lol. ccp buffed scrub ships like t1 firgates and cruisers cause blobbers are afraid to fly something that costs more than a few million iskies. why would you even fly a bc or hac now that cruisers are just as good and cost halve or tenth as much. meanwhile, their going to nerf real pvp ships like t3s because scrubs dont have the balls to field something worth that much so they whine intil ccp does something about it. o7m8s enjoy ur carebear pvp.
Oh oh! Seems I struck a nerve with an eve elitist who thinks "Hurr durr, only t3/t2 should be used in pvp!" |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:06:00 -
[89] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:
So... the Cane is fine now and the Cyclone can't fulfill the role the dual neut Cane did before. Oh... uh, cool. Guess the game designers did know what they were doing afterall.
-Liang
I got a bit side tracked with your silliness about hitting frigs as the cyclone can in this fit still do it fairly well - tho not as well as the cane can - but thats entirely aside from my original point which was a the rhetoric used to nerf a certain fitting style on the cane that has nothing to do with its ability to hit frigs, which it can no longer do and was supposedly unbalanced in a BC yet the cyclone post patch can do it which it couldn't before. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3122
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:10:00 -
[90] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:
So... the Cane is fine now and the Cyclone can't fulfill the role the dual neut Cane did before. Oh... uh, cool. Guess the game designers did know what they were doing afterall.
-Liang
I got a bit side tracked with your silliness about hitting frigs as the cyclone can in this fit still do it fairly well - tho not as well as the cane can - but thats entirely aside from my original point which was a the rhetoric used to nerf a certain fitting style on the cane that has nothing to do with its ability to hit frigs, which it can no longer do and was supposedly unbalanced in a BC yet the cyclone post patch can do it which it couldn't before.
I still don't believe that the Cyclone evinces the same behavior that the Hurricane did. I continue to offer you the ability to prove me wrong upon the honourable field of combat. Additionally, the ability to fit two neuts isn't strictly what was talked about - there were a whole host of other issues.
Perhaps you'd like to quote the post you're referencing in full? :)
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:22:00 -
[91] - Quote
I love that you used honourable field of combat in context of amamake... the home of hot drops, smartbombing battleships and falcon alts  |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3122
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:24:00 -
[92] - Quote
So I take it that you are not interested in proving yourself correct? How about we get real with this and get Chribba to hold 5 billion ISK each?
-Liang
Ed: You know, putting your money where your mouth is and all that. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:32:00 -
[93] - Quote
^^ It wouldn't prove anything in regards to the fit - I've no pretensions that I'm anything but average if I'm being generous at solo PVP - far more at home in a guardian or triage carrier. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3122
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:33:00 -
[94] - Quote
Alrighty then. I guess you're just not willing to defend your claims about the Cyclone and your honour. Just for the record, though: Heretics honor 1v1s. And your ass was grass. :)
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:38:00 -
[95] - Quote
Don't actually have a character that could do it anyhow - my min alt is entirely lacking missile skills and Rroff is primarily trained for gal/cal and capitals. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3123
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:40:00 -
[96] - Quote
Ah. Well, take it from someone who can actually fly the ships in question. They're really not the same - at all. The ability for one to fit dual neuts and the other not is just not the kind of issue you're making it out to be. The Cane is fine - no, really, I promise.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:44:00 -
[97] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Ah. Well, take it from someone who can actually fly the ships in question. They're really not the same - at all. The ability for one to fit dual neuts and the other not is just not the kind of issue you're making it out to be. The Cane is fine - no, really, I promise.
-Liang
As I said it wasn't so much about the cane being fine or not, just confusing that the rhetoric that was used to justify changes to it is now relevant to the cyclone post patch when it couldn't be before the patch - which is just confusing. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3980
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 11:31:00 -
[98] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:As a side note, I like the suggestion of boosters having a signature bloom instead of being on grid. There needs to be an added stipulation that they cannot be in a POS to run their boosts though. Yes. Yes, yes, yes. Forcing boosters to be on-grid is a sloppy and imperfect fix that hurts smaller groups more than larger ones. I say this because larger groups are generally more capable of keeping boosters alive in fleets should they happen to be primaried, and more capable of replacing them on the fly if they still manage to get themselves blown up. As a result we generally keep our command ships on field anyway, often using them as anchor points for the fleet or for logistics.
Smaller groups don't have this luxury and so they need to take steps to keep their boosters safe in order to be competitive. Having an off grid booster would help with this, but they do need to be made much easier to find.
I don't agree with the signature bloom because doing so would increase the damage taken by the ship (more damage from large and XL missiles, easier tracking by large and XL turrets and more damage from fighters and titan turrets). I'd argue that instead the sensor strength of the ship should be severely cut while links are active. This could lead to problems where the booster gets very easily jammed and as a result can't broadcast targets, but that seems like something CCP could easily fix. I never understood why target broadcasting is limited to targets that can be locked by the broadcasting ship. I think the requirement for broadcasting targets should simply be that the broadcaster and target are on the same grid together.
Boosting T3s could have some subsystem tweaking so that the fleet boosting subsystem is offensive rather than defensive, which would have the effect of rendering T3s unable to give both maximum fleet boosts while fitting a covert ops cloak (since that would require a separate offensive subsystem). The defensive subsystem previously used for fleet boosting would be repurposed, and the offensive subsystem being replaced would be one of the subsystems pretty much nobody ever uses (i.e. that hybrid subsystem on the Tengu, or the drone subsystem on the Legion).
And of course boosting would be disallowed from within a certain distance of POS shields, say, 50 km (with the exception of mining links for obvious reasons, unless changes were also made to the Rorqual that didn't require using the Industrial Core for maximum boosts). Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |

Stitcher
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
914
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 11:58:00 -
[99] - Quote
Truly it is written: "Improve things, and people will hate you for it." An in-character blog and a video: http://verinsjournal.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu1mbsgo738
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7697
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:01:00 -
[100] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote:Quote:Tiericide made the Caracal a beastly killing machine, buffed the thorax, made the stabber better, and made some pretty freaking badass support cruisers Tiericide Improved the drake's dps, improved the harbinger's dps, took the hurricane down a slight notch to not be the king of small gang pvp go-to ship, and improved the myrmidon's practical dps lol. ccp buffed scrub ships like t1 firgates and cruisers cause blobbers are afraid to fly something that costs more than a few million iskies. why would you even fly a bc or hac now that cruisers are just as good and cost halve or tenth as much. meanwhile, their going to nerf real pvp ships like t3s because scrubs dont have the balls to field something worth that much so they whine intil ccp does something about it. o7m8s enjoy ur carebear pvp.
Milton Middleson's post strikes Milton Middleson's credibility for wrecking damage
Milton Middleson's credibility begins to explode Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1316
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:04:00 -
[101] - Quote
Best part about this thread is the Damn Cammode guys implying that being in a small gang means you have skill.
Sorry bro, but if your go to ship was the Cane or Drake your 'skill' is automatically under investigation.
Oh by the way did you realize that every trash throwaway fleet in 0.0 was made of drakes? All them skilled Goonies and Test guys do so appreciate the comments. Somehow I see them adapting quite fast....you on the other hand...yea you'll probably just unsub in a huff.
Poor lil fella. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3986
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:44:00 -
[102] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Somehow I see them adapting quite fast And by adapting you mean that we're celebrating that we don't have to constantly fly the damn things anymore. Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |

adopt
Hostile. PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
550
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 13:01:00 -
[103] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Somehow I see them adapting quite fast And by adapting you mean that we're celebrating that we don't have to constantly fly the damn things anymore.
Don't worry, there will be another FOTM BC any day now. Shadoo > Always remember to fit Cynosural Field Generator I, have 450 Liquid Ozone in your cargo and convo a friendly Pandemic Legion member if you have a capital or super capital ship tackled.
|

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
761
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 13:02:00 -
[104] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:-- HAM Drake -- Remember how I said it's all "Approach, F1" nowadays? Yeah... Approach angled, select target, take damage as you cross the 'target but can't reach' zone, F1 Javelins, launch drones, update angle of approach, cease fire & load Rage, recall and rep drones as needed, continue angled approach, F1 Rage, monitor drones... Monitor local, monitor defenses...
Not entirely mechanistic. Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Silk daShocka
Greasy Hair Club
316
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 13:03:00 -
[105] - Quote
So when will people that complain about small gang pvp getting nerfed start basing they're arguments on small gang vs. small gang instead of small gang vs. blob.
That being said, tiericide has done some good to small gangs. T1 logistics for isntance. Cheap and effective. |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
809
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 13:25:00 -
[106] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Liang Nuren wrote: It's ok hun. It'll all be ok and better in the morning dearie.
/pat pat
-Liang
Can only assume your completely missing the point of what I'm saying as the responses aren't in any way an appropriate one. If you actually have something useful to contribute say it. what you are saying is that kiting nano ships (which are virtually zero risk if flown with a bare minimum of competency) are the epitome of elite pvp.
also that picking on soft targets (stragglers, fleets without recons or logistics, ...) makes you good at pvp.
hearing you loud & clear. I'm a NPC corp alt, any argument I make is invalid. |

Rico Minali
The Straw Men Dark Therapy
1226
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 13:29:00 -
[107] - Quote
I like the changes and contrary to the OP I believe that no you will see a greater variation in what makes up small gang pvp. Now, the other BCs are usable in small gang/solo, you wont necessarily know what you are going to face when you go roaming.
Until now you would expect to see drake or cane gangs, or some other fotm class of ships, with the new changes expect to find gangs of prophecies along with brutix, rather than 'see prophecy, expect baited hotdrop'.
More viable options # better and more varied play. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Eva Perez
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 13:33:00 -
[108] - Quote
I hate you guys. |

MisterNick
The Sagan Clan Pax Romana Alliance
214
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 13:33:00 -
[109] - Quote
While I commend the OP on his skill at ventriloquism, I must disagree with what his arse is saying. "Human beings make life so interesting. Do you know that in a universe so full of wonders, they have managed to invent boredom." |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3986
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 13:35:00 -
[110] - Quote
adopt wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Somehow I see them adapting quite fast And by adapting you mean that we're celebrating that we don't have to constantly fly the damn things anymore. Don't worry, there will be another FOTM BC any day now. inb4 welpclone doctrine
To be honest there already is another FOTM BC - it's the Naga. However I don't think it's so overpowered as to be a problem, however it IS an excellent ship. Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:11:00 -
[111] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:Rroff wrote:Liang Nuren wrote: It's ok hun. It'll all be ok and better in the morning dearie.
/pat pat
-Liang
Can only assume your completely missing the point of what I'm saying as the responses aren't in any way an appropriate one. If you actually have something useful to contribute say it. what you are saying is that kiting nano ships (which are virtually zero risk if flown with a bare minimum of competency) are the epitome of elite pvp. also that picking on soft targets (stragglers, fleets without recons or logistics, ...) makes you good at pvp. hearing you loud & clear.
Seeing as the fitting that the original comments were made about were based around fits along the lines of:
[Hurricane, armorcane] Damage Control II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Stasis Webifier II Stasis Webifier II Warp Scrambler II
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Hail M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Hail M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Hail M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Hail M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Hail M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Hail M Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator I Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Hammerhead II x1 Hobgoblin II x4
Which are no longer possible to do - I have absolutely no idea what your talking about and like liang are probably missing entirely the point of what I'm talking about. I can only assume you think I'm talking about shield "whelp" canes which is entirely a different matter. |

Mathrin
Synthetic Solution Synthetic Systems
62
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:14:00 -
[112] - Quote
Quite crying and go fly a cyclone. I mean have you seen that thing? It's like the drake a cane of old rolled into one. |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:22:00 -
[113] - Quote
Mathrin wrote:Quit crying and go fly a cyclone. I mean have you seen that thing? It's like the drake a cane of old rolled into one.
I'm not crying and neither do I have much interest in flying either the cane or cyclone. I just find it a bit odd that the abilities of the cane in certain fits were put out as the reasoning for the changes it had this patch as being unsuited to a BC yet post patch the cyclone can now be fit in a way that has the same/similiar attributes.
End of the day my min alt will be flying lokis in wormhole space and these changes don't directly affect me - its just becoming a worrying trend in eve lately and sooner or later will probably affect something I fly. |

Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
647
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:26:00 -
[114] - Quote
Quote:That being said, tiericide has done some good to small gangs. T1 logistics for isntance. Cheap and effective.
Been over this before. Logistics ships pretty much make blobs immune to small gang harassment. There used to be some cost and risk associated with this but now, nope. Any t1 shitfleet can have logistics.
Quote:Best part about this thread is the Damn Cammode guys implying that being in a small gang means you have skill. Sorry bro, but if your go to ship was the Cane or Drake your 'skill' is automatically under investigation.
Even the worst small gang PVPer is leagues better than a blobbing scrub who doesn't know anything other than F1.
Quote: Quit crying and go fly a cyclone. I mean have you seen that thing? It's like the drake a cane of old rolled into one.
So they homogenized two interesting, unique ships and then made them ****.. How exciting |

Aren Madigan
EVE University Ivy League
82
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:32:00 -
[115] - Quote
Maybe stop flying flavor of the month and focus on what playstyle you enjoy the most, learning that and working around its weaknesses? Perish the thought. |

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
245
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:37:00 -
[116] - Quote
This is fantastic. |

Silk daShocka
Greasy Hair Club
316
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:46:00 -
[117] - Quote
Kahega Amielden wrote:Quote:That being said, tiericide has done some good to small gangs. T1 logistics for isntance. Cheap and effective.
Been over this before. Logistics ships pretty much make blobs immune to small gang harassment. There used to be some cost and risk associated with this but now, nope. Any t1 shitfleet can have logistics.
Why do you think larger fleets should be vulnerable to small gang harassment? Don't you think it would make more sense to compare small gang vs. small gang fights when balancing decisions are made? |

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations Shaktipat Revelators
1478
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:49:00 -
[118] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and agree with OP. It is absolutely unreasonable for the Drake to be nerfed multiple times. What do CCP think it is, a ****** titan?!
The Drake used to be the perfect balance for small gang PvP and now it is unusable. Couple that with the Tengu being kicked into obsolesence , and the Hurricane becoming a pile of you-know-what, I don't know how solo and small gang PvP will survive.
CCP needs to wake up. Don't nerf things that work well just becuase everything else sucks. Buff the things that suck! For example, like happened to frigates.
Can't agree. Drake is not unusable. Neither is the Hurricane. |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
763
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:52:00 -
[119] - Quote
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and agree with OP. It is absolutely unreasonable for the Drake to be nerfed multiple times. What do CCP think it is, a ****** titan?!
The Drake used to be the perfect balance for small gang PvP and now it is unusable. Couple that with the Tengu being kicked into obsolesence , and the Hurricane becoming a pile of you-know-what, I don't know how solo and small gang PvP will survive.
CCP needs to wake up. Don't nerf things that work well just becuase everything else sucks. Buff the things that suck! For example, like happened to frigates. Can't agree. Drake is not unusable. Neither is the Hurricane. Drake still works. You just have to be willing to work with it a bit, and find a new build or two. But there is a radical concept! Getting way from cookie-cutter BattleClinic builds and experimenting a bit..! 
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1191
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:58:00 -
[120] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote:This is fantastic. Truly. 10/10 If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |

Aracimia Wolfe
Brave Newbies Inc.
217
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:58:00 -
[121] - Quote
ITT: people complaining about their ships choices not being the best choice by miles anymore are told to HTFU by people with half a modicum of sense.
Go try the new ships. Also lol at anyone still complaining about drones. This drone specialist still be working fine. Malcanis for CSM 8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717 \o/ \o/ \o/ \o/ m8m8m8m8m8m8m8 o7
|

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
158
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:59:00 -
[122] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote: What are you going to small gang roam in? Feroxes? Please.
Don't make me go into the pile of garbage that passes for "working ships" these days. It's all "approach, push F1" or "orbit, push F1". Carebears might whine about PvE getting to be "more like" PvP, but it's really PvP that is turning into PvE. If you like these changes, you probably should just go run some level 4's. You'll find that fun.
Please do this the next time you see me, it makes my life so much easyer when ships fly directly at my large blasters.
I didnt know miners and freighter pilots from hi-sec flew at you?? |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7703
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:59:00 -
[123] - Quote
Aracimia Wolfe wrote:
Go try the newly viable ships.
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Aracimia Wolfe
Brave Newbies Inc.
217
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:02:00 -
[124] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Aracimia Wolfe wrote:
Go try the newly viable ships.
Amendment accepted Malcanis for CSM 8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717 \o/ \o/ \o/ \o/ m8m8m8m8m8m8m8 o7
|

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
987
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:09:00 -
[125] - Quote
I'm just having a hard time grasping why anyone thinks game balance decisions should be made on the basis of small gang versus large blob combat. The Margin Trading Scam: If you fell for it, it's your own damned fault. Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7704
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:10:00 -
[126] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:I'm just having a hard time grasping why anyone thinks game balance decisions should be made on the basis of small gang versus large blob combat.
Nerf Rock; Paper is fine
- Scissors Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:18:00 -
[127] - Quote
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Can't agree. Drake is not unusable. Neither is the Hurricane.
Unusable no - but the cane for instance was one of the least broken ships in the game - making it more clunky to fit so its more inline with the other ships isn't really progress.
Seen the same with weapon systems and other aspects of the game, where stuff thats working as expected for some reason gets downgraded at the same time as stuff thats seriously under-performing getting massaged upwards,,, get the feeling someones so scared of "power creep" they are hazarding on undercutting things than trying to actually balance things. I hate to think what will happen to other long range weapons if they actually ever get to fixing small/medium railguns using spike ammo. |

Joran Dravius
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
112
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:22:00 -
[128] - Quote
All I hear is "Nooooo my win buttooooon!". |

Eva Perez
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:35:00 -
[129] - Quote
I can ruinz thread?
http://rifterlings.com/kb/?a=home
|

Arduemont
Tempest Legion Corcoran State
1228
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:44:00 -
[130] - Quote
Kahega Amielden wrote:Latest in a long line of small gang PVP nerfs...
Small gang and solo has been getting buffed for the last three expansion. Small gang isn't getting harder. Your just getting worse. "In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:48:00 -
[131] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:Rroff wrote:Liang Nuren wrote: It's ok hun. It'll all be ok and better in the morning dearie.
/pat pat
-Liang
Can only assume your completely missing the point of what I'm saying as the responses aren't in any way an appropriate one. If you actually have something useful to contribute say it. what you are saying is that kiting nano ships (which are virtually zero risk if flown with a bare minimum of competency) are the epitome of elite pvp. also that picking on soft targets (stragglers, fleets without recons or logistics, ...) makes you good at pvp. hearing you loud & clear.
So, what does make you good at PvP then? Hitting approach, F1, and hoping your blob has enough numbers to counter their blob? Feh.
Eve is not a game about fair fights. Even if you're outnumbered, a skilled pilot (or a small gang) should be able to pick at and weaken/inconvenience/incapacitate a larger gang. That the game is moving towards a state in which that is no longer possible, and in which your only recourse to numbers is to step up your own numbers is worrying and saddening. CCP is milking small gang PvP to feed the ever growing blob, and it's not going unnoticed.
Karl Hobb wrote:Milton Middleson wrote:This is fantastic. Truly. 10/10 Yeah, I agree.
Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Solstice Project
Brave Newbies Inc.
2777
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:50:00 -
[132] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:I can't believe you guys. Did all the real PvPers leave when I wasn't looking, just to be replaced by blobbing braindead goons?
I should just unsub, this game is starting to not be worth it anymore. I'm not paying to be part of a super carebear noob haven of people who like to pretend they "PvP". I always thought a lot of good things about the Rifterlings, but you just make yourself look bad.
I hope i'm just missing something, but from my perspective it looks like you're whining about having lost your overpowered ships. And they were overpowered. There's a reason why people used them so much. It's because they want easy play and not a challenge.
Now you act like the only thing combat is is pressing F1-F8 and hitting orbit/keep at range, as if YOU were one of the carebears not knowing any better.
Your posts **** me off. I thought better of you. The only thought that now comes up reading your posts is:
Stop whining, noob. Thanks. Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
245
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:52:00 -
[133] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Can't agree. Drake is not unusable. Neither is the Hurricane.
Unusable no - but the cane for instance was one of the least broken ships in the game - making it more clunky to fit so its more inline with the other ships isn't really progress. Seen the same with weapon systems and other aspects of the game, where stuff thats working as expected for some reason gets downgraded at the same time as stuff thats seriously under-performing getting massaged upwards,,, get the feeling someones so scared of "power creep" they are hazarding on undercutting things than trying to actually balance things. I hate to think what will happen to other long range weapons if they actually ever get to fixing small/medium railguns using spike ammo.
The hurricane was one of the most broken ships in the game specifically because it was laughably easy to fit. Apparently CCP meant it to be an artillery platform, so its AC variations had a ludicrous amount of grid with which to fit largest guns + heaviest tank + dual medium neuts. On top of that, it was as fast as a cruiser with virtually no drawback to being so. If you wanted to pick a ship which was ruining small pvp by overshadowing most of the alternatives, the hurricane would be a good choice.
And it's hardly ruined. It's received a minor agility nerf, lost a bit of utility, and now you have to think about what you put on it and why you want those 425mm ACs rather than 220mms. |

Xpaulusx
Naari LLC
196
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:53:00 -
[134] - Quote
Look, not every one is going to agree with everything CCP does to ships and thats fine. Personally i didnt like what they did to the cyclone simply because i perfer projectiles for fighting, but i know 5 others that like it, so i accepted it as just another change to adapt to. Is it world ending, no. long as Fozzie dosen't touch the vaga & tempest i have no problems with what he does " laughs'. ...................................................... |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2338
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 15:59:00 -
[135] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote:Rroff wrote:Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Can't agree. Drake is not unusable. Neither is the Hurricane.
Unusable no - but the cane for instance was one of the least broken ships in the game - making it more clunky to fit so its more inline with the other ships isn't really progress. Seen the same with weapon systems and other aspects of the game, where stuff thats working as expected for some reason gets downgraded at the same time as stuff thats seriously under-performing getting massaged upwards,,, get the feeling someones so scared of "power creep" they are hazarding on undercutting things than trying to actually balance things. I hate to think what will happen to other long range weapons if they actually ever get to fixing small/medium railguns using spike ammo. The hurricane was one of the most broken ships in the game specifically because it was laughably easy to fit. Apparently CCP meant it to be an artillery platform, so its AC variations had a ludicrous amount of grid with which to fit largest guns + heaviest tank + dual medium neuts. On top of that, it was as fast as a cruiser with virtually no drawback to being so. If you wanted to pick a ship which was ruining small pvp by overshadowing most of the alternatives, the hurricane would be a good choice. And it's hardly ruined. It's received a minor agility nerf, lost a bit of utility, and now you have to think about what you put on it and why you want those 425mm ACs rather than 220mms. Milton! What are you doing?? Stop! Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2338
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:07:00 -
[136] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:I can't believe you guys. Did all the real PvPers leave when I wasn't looking, just to be replaced by blobbing braindead goons?
I should just unsub, this game is starting to not be worth it anymore. I'm not paying to be part of a super carebear noob haven of people who like to pretend they "PvP". I always thought a lot of good things about the Rifterlings, but you just make yourself look bad. I hope i'm just missing something, but from my perspective it looks like you're whining about having lost your overpowered ships. And they were overpowered. There's a reason why people used them so much. It's because they want easy play and not a challenge. Now you act like the only thing combat is is pressing F1-F8 and hitting orbit/keep at range, as if YOU were one of the carebears not knowing any better. Your posts **** me off. I thought better of you. The only thought that now comes up reading your posts is: Stop whining, noob. Thanks. They. Were. Not. Overpowered. They were the only ships with proper fittings and attributes to do their damn jobs. Now they've been nerfed to be the same as the rest of the crap they call for "ships". Why not pull those up instead, hmm?
I don't think you've ever fought Rifterlings (you don't show up on our KB), so it's understandable why you wouldn't understand how much the Drake means to us. You should really check it and see what we fight in those "keep at range and F1" Drakes before you level stupid accusations like that. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Arduemont
Tempest Legion Corcoran State
1228
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:07:00 -
[137] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: Milton! What are you doing?? Stop!
Got a lol out of this. Please continue.
"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2338
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:08:00 -
[138] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote: Milton! What are you doing?? Stop!
Got a lol out of this. Please continue. There is discord in our ranks...  Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6923
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:12:00 -
[139] - Quote
"guys we were just trolling LOL gotcha" ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
988
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:13:00 -
[140] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:They were the only ships with proper fittings and attributes to do their damn jobs. This was precisely the problem. They made every other battlecruiser in the game obsolete, which is indicative of poor game balance.
Petrus Blackshell wrote: Now they've been nerfed to be the same as the rest of the crap they call for "ships". Why not pull those up instead, hmm?
Because obsoleting every cruiser in the game by making ALL the battle cruisers over powered would be indicative of even worse game balance than we already had.
We get it - you're pissed because your play style got changed (I won't use nerfed, because that's not an accurate term, if you look at the issue objectively). To that, I will say, in the words of CCP themselves: "HTFU." Adapt or die - it's the Eve way. The Margin Trading Scam: If you fell for it, it's your own damned fault. Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
989
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:14:00 -
[141] - Quote
Andski wrote:"guys we were just trolling LOL gotcha"
I'm actually waiting for this - back pedaling is the most sincere form of admitting defeat. The Margin Trading Scam: If you fell for it, it's your own damned fault. Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
12940
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:15:00 -
[142] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Eve is not a game about fair fights. Even if you're outnumbered, a skilled pilot (or a small gang) should be able to pick at and weaken/inconvenience/incapacitate a larger gang. GǪand making the viable ship decision cover a larger spectrum of ships rather than have everyone + dog in the same two ships means that there will be even more room to make use of your clever decisions (in both ships and fittings and tactics) to pick at the mistakes done by the lesser-skilled.
It means that more skill will be required to put together a well-sorted fleet and make all the parts match up; more skill to provide a full set of counters; more skill to employ said counters at the right time against the right thing; more skill required for every single partGǪ and the monoculture blob will be ridiculously maladapted to all the variations that will come its way (if you're skilled enough to keep them guessing).
Quote:They. Were. Not. Overpowered. They were the only ships with proper fittings and attributes to do their damn jobs. GǪin other words, overpowered. They were not meant to do all that stuff (much less at once) GÇö they were meant to be pieces of a larger jigsaw, where everything put on them meant something else was left out. Now you have to, you know, apply a bit of skill to fit them for the one specific job they're going to fill at any given time. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
989
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:16:00 -
[143] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Eve is not a game about fair fights. Even if you're outnumbered, a skilled pilot (or a small gang) should be able to pick at and weaken/inconvenience/incapacitate a larger gang. GǪand making the viable ship decision cover a larger spectrum of ships rather than have everyone + dog in the same two ships means that there will be even more room to make use of your clever decisions (in both ships and fittings and tactics) to pick at the mistakes done by the lesser-skilled. It means that more skill will be required to put together a well-sorted fleet and make all the parts match up; more skill to provide a full set of counters; more skill to employ said counters at the right time against the right thing; more skill required for every single partGǪ and the monoculture blob will be ridiculously maladapted to all the variations that will come its way (if you're skilled enough to keep them guessing).
But...but...but :effort:  The Margin Trading Scam: If you fell for it, it's your own damned fault. Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
763
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:16:00 -
[144] - Quote
Tippia wrote: It means that more skill will be required to put together a well-sorted fleet...
This appears to the center of the butthurt issue for many folks.
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
246
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:20:00 -
[145] - Quote
Quote:"guys we were just trolling LOL gotcha"
I'm sorry we wasted your time raising serious issues to the community.
De'Veldrin wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:They were the only ships with proper fittings and attributes to do their damn jobs. This was precisely the problem. They made every other battlecruiser in the game obsolete, which is indicative of poor game balance. Petrus Blackshell wrote: Now they've been nerfed to be the same as the rest of the crap they call for "ships". Why not pull those up instead, hmm?
Because obsoleting every cruiser in the game by making ALL the battle cruisers over powered would be indicative of even worse game balance than we already had. We get it - you're pissed because your play style got changed (I won't use nerfed, because that's not an accurate term, if you look at the issue objectively). To that, I will say, in the words of CCP themselves: "HTFU." Adapt or die - it's the Eve way.
I'm not gonna lie, I don't think his play style got nerfed. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2338
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:20:00 -
[146] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:Andski wrote:"guys we were just trolling LOL gotcha" I'm actually waiting for this - back pedaling is the most sincere form of admitting defeat. Tch, you'd deem me a mere troll?
I'll be a Drake pilot till the day I die. 1372 kills in them and going strong.
I am just lamenting the ruin of what used to once be a good ship to now being a second rate piece of trash. Of course I'll "adapt" (geez you guys are like a broken record), but the reason I am complaining is because I do not think adapting is possible after so much performance reduction. I'm sure there are others who feel the same. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Arduemont
Tempest Legion Corcoran State
1228
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:24:00 -
[147] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Andski wrote:"guys we were just trolling LOL gotcha" I'm actually waiting for this - back pedaling is the most sincere form of admitting defeat. Tch, you'd deem me a mere troll? I'll be a Drake pilot till the day I die. 1372 kills in them and going strong. I am just lamenting the ruin of what used to once be a good ship to now being a second rate piece of trash. Of course I'll "adapt" (geez you guys are like a broken record), but the reason I am complaining is because I do not think adapting is possible after so much performance reduction. I'm sure there are others who feel the same.
Fit gank over tank and you'll be laughing. The drake is not broken, it's just more of a heavy hitter than a tank now. Put a scram and a web on it and fit for max damage. Do hit and runs and you'll kill things significantly faster than people will think your capable of. "In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
3582
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:26:00 -
[148] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and agree with OP. It is absolutely unreasonable for the Drake to be nerfed multiple times. What do CCP think it is, a ****** titan?!
The Drake used to be the perfect balance for small gang PvP and now it is unusable. Couple that with the Tengu being kicked into obsolesence , and the Hurricane becoming a pile of you-know-what, I don't know how solo and small gang PvP will survive.
CCP needs to wake up. Don't nerf things that work well just becuase everything else sucks. Buff the things that suck! For example, like happened to frigates. If you have to have an extremely overpowered ship to be successful at solo or small gang PVP, you weren't actually very good at it to begin with.  To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
12943
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:32:00 -
[149] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:I am just lamenting the ruin of what used to once be a good ship to now being a second rate piece of trash. Yes, the fate of the Phantasm is indeed a very sad story. It doesn't particularly have anything to do with making sure both the Drake and the Cane remain very good ships, even when the other BCs are being adjusted to be worth-while alongside themGǪ but so far, it has worked rather well. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
3583
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:34:00 -
[150] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:I am just lamenting the ruin of what used to once be a good ship to now being a second rate piece of trash. Yes, the fate of the Phantasm is indeed a very sad story. It doesn't particularly have anything to do with making sure both the Drake and the Cane remain very good ships, even when the other BCs are being adjusted to be worth-while alongside themGǪ but so far, it has worked rather well. I really want to still love my Phantasm, I really do, but circumstances conspire to make that very difficult to do. 
Still, faction rebalance is on the way. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Kurt Saken
State War Academy Caldari State
79
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:38:00 -
[151] - Quote
It hurts a bit to see one of your favourite ships in the game getting nerfed, but Drakes and Canes are still kings compared to the rest of BCs (except Nagas and Nados).
Anyway, most of the "battles" in EvE are decided before starting, so we shouldn't worry too much about the "balances". It's all about overwhelming the opponent and that is all.
Sure you can have good fights here and there, but this isn't common.
Edit. Typo |

Solstice Project
Brave Newbies Inc.
2777
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:39:00 -
[152] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Andski wrote:"guys we were just trolling LOL gotcha" I'm actually waiting for this - back pedaling is the most sincere form of admitting defeat. Tch, you'd deem me a mere troll? I'll be a Drake pilot till the day I die. 1372 kills in them and going strong. I am just lamenting the ruin of what used to once be a good ship to now being a second rate piece of trash. Of course I'll "adapt" (geez you guys are like a broken record), but the reason I am complaining is because I do not think adapting is possible after so much performance reduction. I'm sure there are others who feel the same. Ah ... yes, i misunderstood the part about "Approach, F1". My bad.
Anyhow ... you're actually confirming that it was overpowered. 1372 kills ... hey, that's great. Really, nice work ... ... but why couldn't you do that in anything else than a drake ?
Why didn't you pull that off in anything else ?
Why did you use the drake ?
Because the other ships were crap ? Or because the drake was overpowered ? Thanks ... no need to respond, you've already shown your obvious bias.
Now stop ruining your credibility ... because that's what you do.
Thanks. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2339
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:40:00 -
[153] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:no need to respond Right, and I'm the troll here.  Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
1523
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:51:00 -
[154] - Quote
Kahega Amielden wrote:Bienator II wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Okay so if everything is so good, tell me: how would you handle a blob if you're solo or in a small gang (5-10 people or less). Oh and don't say "bring links" because CCP are about to nerf those too as part of their crusade to buff the goon blob. why do you believe you should be able to fight a blob solo? Because skill should mean more than numbers.
it does. The skill to run from the blob is part of it if you know you can not cause any damage.
what you wanted to say is that your cookie cutter OGB fitting should win the fight. Since boosted solo ships are currently so far out of balance that you can ignore any "eve skills" like situational awareness or ship knowledge. Your whole argument does not make sense. Balancing is wrong since you can no longer fly good ships? You can now fly good ships all the time. Sure your opponent has a good ship too, but thats where the fun starts.
i don't give a *** when i die to a blob. But i DO care if i die in engagements where i thought they where fair. Thats when i start to search for mistakes or optimize fittings. Those fights are good fights, since they are challenging. a eve-style bounty system (done)-á dust boarding parties You fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Keno Skir
Vectis Covert Solutions
395
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:54:00 -
[155] - Quote
All i think reading this thread is that Petrus Blackshell needs to put his toys back in the pram.
You used to post useful and interesting PvP based articles and threads. You were once the first to point out that if someone is failing at PvP it's because they didn't have a good enough plan.
Seems all that's gone out the window now your win button has been taken away..
No offence intended but i never thought i'd be yelling HTFU at you Petrus  If you have any further thoughts on something i've posted, or want to ask an unrelated question feel free to contact me by EvE Mail or by private conversation if 'm online. BUDDY TRIALS AVAILABLE - 21days plus big ISK bonus and starting assistance |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3136
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 17:55:00 -
[156] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: They. Were. Not. Overpowered. They were the only ships with proper fittings and attributes to do their damn jobs. Now they've been nerfed to be the same as the rest of the crap they call for "ships". Why not pull those up instead, hmm?
I don't think you've ever fought Rifterlings (you don't show up on our KB), so it's understandable why you wouldn't understand how much the Drake means to us. You should really check it and see what we fight in those "keep at range and F1" Drakes before you level stupid accusations like that.
Hum.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3136
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 17:57:00 -
[157] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Andski wrote:"guys we were just trolling LOL gotcha" I'm actually waiting for this - back pedaling is the most sincere form of admitting defeat. Tch, you'd deem me a mere troll? I'll be a Drake pilot till the day I die. 1372 kills in them and going strong. I am just lamenting the ruin of what used to once be a good ship to now being a second rate piece of trash. Of course I'll "adapt" (geez you guys are like a broken record), but the reason I am complaining is because I do not think adapting is possible after so much performance reduction. I'm sure there are others who feel the same.
Hmmm. I suspect we'll see a second balancing pass. I'm pretty sure the "Drake" will get nerfed again. Just because of this thread. 
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
771
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 18:13:00 -
[158] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: I'm not sure how you're getting the "same tank" since the Drake got a flat out reduction to its base HP. It is also not only slower but less agile (more massive) and thus far more poorly suited for small gang PvP. On top of that, the "higher damage" claim is only applicable if you use HAMs, which is an exceptionally bad idea when fighting outnumbered, as it means you are probably close enough to not have any route of escape, and will likely just die an embarassing death. HMLs on the Drake are now worthless. Not only do they do significantly less damage, but the "buff" that Fury missiles received also made them be as bad at hitting things as torpedoes are, cutting off the only way to get even close to the same performance.
So, yeah, i'm really enjoying this "buffed" Drake.
I keep coming back to this. See, here's the problem I have: I check-fitted my primary Drake fitting last night, and found a 50% greater throw-weight with a less than 10% EHP hit, and a less than 5% velocity hit.
My Drake hits MUCH harder now than before. I was even able to dump my comically-expensive BCS units for some T2s, and retain almost all of the firepower buff. It's taken minor losses in maneuverability and toughness. Yes, I'm using HAMs. I was using HAMs before, too. Yes, it means managing your ship more intensely, but that's learnable. You're calling the result 'Trash." I'm looking at it and thinking: "Hmm. Interesting..."
Can't wait to take it out and test-drive it this evening. 
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
209
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 18:13:00 -
[159] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote:
The hurricane was one of the most broken ships in the game specifically because it was laughably easy to fit. Apparently CCP meant it to be an artillery platform, so its AC variations had a ludicrous amount of grid with which to fit largest guns + heaviest tank + dual medium neuts. On top of that, it was as fast as a cruiser with virtually no drawback to being so. If you wanted to pick a ship which was ruining small pvp by overshadowing most of the alternatives, the hurricane would be a good choice.
And it's hardly ruined. It's received a minor agility nerf, lost a bit of utility, and now you have to think about what you put on it and why you want those 425mm ACs rather than 220mms.
I agree there were situations where you could fit 425s where the proper compromise would have been it shouldn't have been able to fit above 220s but overall I felt it was fairly well balanced with a good play between tank and dps with some granluarity between the levels of dps and tank you could get out of it or speed and tank, etc. far too many ships you either have to go with a half arsed fit thats not very good at either or bias heavily for tank or heavily for dps with very little in the way of inbetween compromises - something that has now with this patch mostly been fixed with the other BCs but I don't think warranted changing the cane as much as it has been. |

Murk Paradox
Dvice Shipyards No Value
260
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 20:25:00 -
[160] - Quote
silens vesica wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote: I'm not sure how you're getting the "same tank" since the Drake got a flat out reduction to its base HP. It is also not only slower but less agile (more massive) and thus far more poorly suited for small gang PvP. On top of that, the "higher damage" claim is only applicable if you use HAMs, which is an exceptionally bad idea when fighting outnumbered, as it means you are probably close enough to not have any route of escape, and will likely just die an embarassing death. HMLs on the Drake are now worthless. Not only do they do significantly less damage, but the "buff" that Fury missiles received also made them be as bad at hitting things as torpedoes are, cutting off the only way to get even close to the same performance.
So, yeah, i'm really enjoying this "buffed" Drake.
I keep coming back to this. See, here's the problem I have: I check-fitted my primary Drake fitting last night, and found a 50% greater throw-weight with a less than 10% EHP hit, and a less than 5% velocity hit. My Drake hits MUCH harder now than before. I was even able to dump my comically-expensive BCS units for some T2s, and retain almost all of the firepower buff. It's taken minor losses in maneuverability and toughness. Yes, I'm using HAMs. I was using HAMs before, too. Yes, it means managing your ship more intensely, but that's learnable. You're calling the result 'Trash." I'm looking at it and thinking: "Hmm. Interesting..." Can't wait to take it out and test-drive it this evening. 
I remade a Prophecy (oldschool theorycrafting) and well, it's freakin psychotically fun. If that's a description.
I had T2 lasers on it but opted to neut and ewar instead (super arbitrator drone boat big brother type).
Tonight I play with my harbinger, which has about the SAME dps as my Abaddon! (600+ I'm not T2 large laser yet ). "I say tomato, you say tomaCCP BAN ALL TOMATOES THEY ARE HARASSING ME I WANT TOMATO FREE HIGHSEC."-á -TheGunslinger42 Proud enforcer of the Code, see [url]http://www.minerbumping.com[/url]-á for details. |

Vol Arm'OOO
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
71
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 20:50:00 -
[161] - Quote
Hamatitio wrote:I like what they've done so far, the drake and hurricane were good... A little too good. They stated in the dev blog that they couldn't bring all BCs to the level of the drake and hurricane, because that would make the cruisers they just finished balancing pointless again.
They needed to bring them down a little bit, and I'm personally glad they brought the other ones up.
When was the last time you saw a prophecy in game? And the myrmidon can now field 5 heavy / sentry drones 4, so its actually better than a vexor. edit: in the drone department
Tiericide is good for EVE, it brings more viable ships to the table, and from what I've seen opens up for a variety of fittings, and not the same old setups we've had for 3-4 years now.
Edited for being bad at math and conceding defeat to the obvious myrm flyers out there :)
I find comments like this funny - terricide did not make more ships viable - rather it simply reshuffled the deck. In case you didnt notice the new FOTM for bc's now is the brutix. Worse terricide took most of the players choice out of the process of fitting the ships. Most of these ships only have one correct way to be fitted and/or used now - ships are missile ships or projectile ships shield ships, armor ships, etc. . . Possibilities for innovation have been removed/limited. Ultimately terricide is about restricting player choice and removing sand from the box, which is bad for a game that markets itself as a sandbox. |

Wacktopia
Noir. Black Legion.
470
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 20:51:00 -
[162] - Quote
Funny. Just did a year of small gang PVP without flying either drake or cane. What did I miss?... The bottom line is that now I have one of those annoying signatures. |

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
446
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 20:54:00 -
[163] - Quote
goons own eve, i own #tweetfleet Follow me on twitter |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2812
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 20:57:00 -
[164] - Quote
So basically because two BCs got brought down to be in line with ALL THE OTHER BCS, small gangs have been nerfed.
And because some frigates were underpowered and got buffed, suddenly everything is no-skill "orbit and F1" PVP.
OP is whining because his ship of choice got hit with a nerfbat. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2812
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 21:01:00 -
[165] - Quote
Vol Arm'OOO wrote:terricide took most of the players choice out of the process of fitting the ships. Most of these ships only have one correct way to be fitted and/or used now - ships are missile ships or projectile ships shield ships, armor ships, etc. . . Possibilities for innovation have been removed/limited.
I disagree. The BCs have ALWAYS had specific weapon and tank roles, and your fitting options were always generally limited to the balance of gank and tank. I'm going to be looking at the new BCs over the next few days specifically to find some out-of-the-box fits, and I promise you there will be some good ones. Give it a month and you'll see just as much variety in fits as before; possibly more considering some of the changes to armor. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 21:20:00 -
[166] - Quote
Vol Arm'OOO wrote:In case you didnt notice the new FOTM for bc's now is the brutix. Riiiight. Obviously the new meta has fully developed in the single day since the patch came out, and you're the only one who's been brilliant enough to see it  |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT
282
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 21:29:00 -
[167] - Quote
The Drake needed balancing.
Folks bitching today, in most cases, likely weren't around when the Drake was actually much, much tougher. Not including the far more recent changes to heavy missiles, there was also (if memory serves) a change to the shield recharge rate and another change to it's base shield capacity.
Like it or don't, and I'm a little PO'd myself, it still had to be done. Have a large alcoholic beverage to salute the "Days of Yore" and get over it. 
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Davion Falcon
Those Once Loyal
36
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 21:42:00 -
[168] - Quote
No, really? Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise. Never forgotten, never forgiven. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3138
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:03:00 -
[169] - Quote
Congratulations, you are Eve Forum User #70344334663945612347 to comment on that. None of the others were able to accomplish their goal either. You lose. Would you like to play again?
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2822
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:06:00 -
[170] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:The Drake needed balancing. Folks bitching today, in most cases, likely weren't around when the Drake was actually much, much tougher. Not including the far more recent changes to heavy missiles, there was also (if memory serves) a change to the shield recharge rate and another change to it's base shield capacity. Like it or don't, and I'm a little PO'd myself, it still had to be done. Have a large alcoholic beverage to salute the "Days of Yore" and get over it.  What I find funny about it is he starts off ranting about how "some ships required skill to fly" and then goes on to say that nerfing the two most OP battlecruisers was a terrible idea. Heaven forbid CCP make other stuff viable to fight against his ship of choice. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3138
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:10:00 -
[171] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: What I find funny about it is he starts off ranting about how "some ships required skill to fly" and then goes on to say that nerfing the two most OP battlecruisers was a terrible idea. Heaven forbid CCP make other stuff viable to fight against his ship of choice.
I didn't notice it at first because of who introduced the thread, but this thread is not actually about battlecruisers.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
791
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:15:00 -
[172] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:So basically because two BCs got brought down to be in line with ALL THE OTHER BCS, small gangs have been nerfed.
And because some frigates were underpowered and got buffed, suddenly everything is no-skill "orbit and F1" PVP.
OP is whining because his ship of choice got hit with a nerfbat. The really hilarious part about this is that it wasn't much of a nerf. From where I sit, it actually looks like a buff: Trade a bit of tank and velocity for the ability to punch much harder in-close. I win. 
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
602
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:22:00 -
[173] - Quote
silens vesica wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:So basically because two BCs got brought down to be in line with ALL THE OTHER BCS, small gangs have been nerfed.
And because some frigates were underpowered and got buffed, suddenly everything is no-skill "orbit and F1" PVP.
OP is whining because his ship of choice got hit with a nerfbat. The really hilarious part about this is that it wasn't much of a nerf. From where I sit, it actually looks like a buff: Trade a bit of tank and velocity for the ability to punch much harder in-close. I win. 
This Even if Hurricane got a very little nerf bat it was necessary, this ship is still very competitive be it armor or shield tank and can do exactly the same thing it did before except for the loss of one med neutralizer that could in a single run cap dry small ships a-la-god-mode. This change was needed, I fly those as much as I can because this ship is just amazing, and I'll keep flying them.
Drake from where I stand I couldn't agree more with Silens, a very smart change offering newer as older players a very good platform for pvp solo, small gang and fleets still ! -how to not like it? *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
467
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:25:00 -
[174] - Quote
Posting in a epic noobzor thread. If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2340
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:25:00 -
[175] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: What I find funny about it is he starts off ranting about how "some ships required skill to fly" and then goes on to say that nerfing the two most OP battlecruisers was a terrible idea. Heaven forbid CCP make other stuff viable to fight against his ship of choice.
I didn't notice it at first because of who introduced the thread, but this thread is not actually about battlecruisers. -Liang I think someone may be getting what this is all about. Enlighten us, please? Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3138
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:33:00 -
[176] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: What I find funny about it is he starts off ranting about how "some ships required skill to fly" and then goes on to say that nerfing the two most OP battlecruisers was a terrible idea. Heaven forbid CCP make other stuff viable to fight against his ship of choice.
I didn't notice it at first because of who introduced the thread, but this thread is not actually about battlecruisers. -Liang I think someone may be getting what this is all about. Enlighten us, please?
It's way more fun if I don't. 
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2340
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:36:00 -
[177] - Quote
So now that Drakefleet is no longer an option, what do the almighty always-right forum warriors of GD recommend that my corp use for FW roams? Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3138
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:46:00 -
[178] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:So now that Drakefleet is no longer an option, what do the almighty always-right forum warriors of GD recommend that my corp use for FW roams?
I enjoyed the Slasher roam you guys did, personally. I think you should have had some people fit MWDs though.
-Liang
Ed: Also, Inty/Bomber roams are always pretty fun. I've been looking at doing a Malediction roam too. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Xessej
Darqsyde Exploration Limited Mass - Effect
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 22:56:00 -
[179] - Quote
So getting a damage buff and a utility high is a nerf of the drake? I'm puzzled. Could it fit a DDD before and no one told me? |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2340
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 23:05:00 -
[180] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Like it or don't, and I'm a little PO'd myself, it still had to be done. Have a large alcoholic beverage to salute the "Days of Yore" and get over it.  Well obviously that's what we'll have to do because CCP is resolute to ruin Eve, but that doesn't mean we cannot complain about it as well -- despite what the HTFU crowd here on the forums thinks. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Eva Perez
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 23:16:00 -
[181] - Quote
I didn't think it was possible, but... Eve forum users actually are this dumb.
Has anyone even read Petrus's signature since this thread started? |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3138
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 23:22:00 -
[182] - Quote
Eva Perez wrote:I didn't think it was possible, but... Eve forum users actually are this dumb.
Has anyone even read Petrus's signature since this thread started?
You have signatures on?
-Liang
Ed: Also, I very rarely actually see them anymore. Last I heard they moved to null sec (or at least out of the FW area). Who knows how Baddy McBads they've become since then. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2340
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 23:28:00 -
[183] - Quote
... You can turn signatures off? Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Eva Perez
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 23:39:00 -
[184] - Quote
The Bad is strong with this one... |

Davion Falcon
Those Once Loyal
36
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 23:49:00 -
[185] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Congratulations, you are Eve Forum User #70344334663945612347 to comment on that. None of the others were able to accomplish their goal either. You lose. Would you like to play again? -Liang
Yet you persist. I had no idea the real Liang Nuren posted.
So, why yes, yes I would.
-Davion Falcon, Those Once Loyal, Random Caldari turned Minmatar Sympathizer, somewhere in lowsec, New Eden Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise. Never forgotten, never forgiven. |

ihcn
Life. Universe. Everything. Clockwork Pineapple
203
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 23:52:00 -
[186] - Quote
Threads like this do an excellent job of dispelling the myth that eve online is a game for intelligent people. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Atrocitas
3139
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 23:56:00 -
[187] - Quote
Davion Falcon wrote: Yet you persist. I had no idea the real Liang Nuren posted.
So, why yes, yes I would.
-Davion Falcon, Those Once Loyal, Random Caldari turned Minmatar Sympathizer, somewhere in lowsec, New Eden
Ok~~, but don't say I didn't warn you that you'll lose. :)
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Solomar Espersei
Quality Assurance The Marmite Collective
349
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 00:00:00 -
[188] - Quote
Is it me, or is this just 10 pages of "welp, so much for the PODLA drake" discourse?
I do think it's a shame that ship is hardly even viable anymore. I think the tactic is still possible though. Maybe look at the Cyclone as your new HML skirmisher. I don't know, I think it's cool that Fozzie seems to be giving us some choices, but I would have rather seen the other BC brought up to Retribution 1.0 BCs in light of how good the new cruisers are. Just my opinion. Quality Assurance
|

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
246
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 00:18:00 -
[189] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:So now that Drakefleet is no longer an option, what do the almighty always-right forum warriors of GD recommend that my corp use for FW roams? I enjoyed the Slasher roam you guys did, personally. I think you should have had some people fit MWDs though.
The Rebel Alliance Doctrine has been revised and updated for the new era, and will feature A-wings and B-wings as well as X-wings.
edit: I will say, that particular fight drove me to the discovery that thanks to the wonders of 125mm ACs, an armor slasher can dual-prop with requiring a fitting mod. |

Bane Veradun
Black Sun Dawning
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 00:19:00 -
[190] - Quote
So the Cane and the Drake are replaced by the Cyclone and the Brutix. Same vicious cycle, over and again. The Cane will probably survive, but this will probably spell obsolesence for the Drake. Oh, it can still tank, but what little DPS it had has been nerfed, so it might as well be shelved. What's funny is that people hated it's tank, not it's damage dealing potential, which was barely adequate anyways after the missile nerf.
CCP can't even break their own stuff correctly. *shrugs*
Long live the Cyclone and Brutix. While you only co-opt the darkness for your petty purposes, I was borne of the darkness. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2340
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 00:21:00 -
[191] - Quote
Bane Veradun wrote:So the Cane and the Drake are replaced by the Cyclone and the Brutix. Same vicious cycle, over and again. The Cane will probably survive, but this will probably spell obsolesence for the Drake. Oh, it can still tank, but what little DPS it had has been nerfed, so it might as well be shelved. What's funny is that people hated it's tank, not it's damage dealing potential, which was barely adequate anyways after the missile nerf.
CCP can't even break their own stuff correctly. *shrugs*
Long live the Cyclone and Brutix. I know, right? It just seems like some CCP dude lost too many ships to Drakes and decided they were OP, so nerfed them into the ground. Disappointing. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - lowsec FW operation, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Karash Amerius
Sutoka
93
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 00:33:00 -
[192] - Quote
Sounds like a few guys, maybe an entire corporation, just hit their level cap and their End Game isn't what they like.
Some of us have been pushing our End Game every expansion...every patch even.
I would say "Adapt" but of course you already knew that. Good luck out there. Karash Amerius Operative, Sutoka |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
12950
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:56:00 -
[193] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:I know, right? It just seems like some CCP dude lost too many ships to Drakes and decided they were OP. Why would they buff the Drake if that were the case?
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Galenwade
Shrubbery Acquisitions
180
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 02:11:00 -
[194] - Quote
hmm , just a thought .
IF flying X makes you a better person/pilot/eve player /skillful because it is harder ( see OP)
And Y just got Nerfed, if you fly Y ( which is now harder) doesn't that make you a better person/pilot/eve player/skillful ?
So the gain for you if you fly your drake, is you now should ( at least in your mind) look like a better person  |

Bloodpetal
Sal's Waste Management and Pod Disposal The Mockers AO
1191
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 03:43:00 -
[195] - Quote
Bane Veradun wrote:So the Cane and the Drake are replaced by the Cyclone and the Brutix. Same vicious cycle, over and again. The Cane will probably survive, but this will probably spell obsolesence for the Drake. Oh, it can still tank, but what little DPS it had has been nerfed, so it might as well be shelved. What's funny is that people hated it's tank, not it's damage dealing potential, which was barely adequate anyways after the missile nerf.
CCP can't even break their own stuff correctly. *shrugs*
Long live the Cyclone and Brutix.
You obviously haven't flown the hilariously pathetic Cyclone.
Where I am. |

Kurumia
Perkone Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 04:47:00 -
[196] - Quote
I too think that a mistake was made by nerfing the drake, but not for the reason that most people give. Yes the drake was overpowered a bit for it's class, but when many people start out, they can easily get into it, and then use it for a long time and engage in all kinds of small scale warfare; it was very useful and versatile in this role.
But it did something else which was important. It made everyone that wanted to fly it have to learn to use all kinds of shield technologies. And to ever move on to large scale warfare, all of these players had to eventually move on to armor technologies, to compete successfully.
So yes it warped somewhat the career paths of so many pilots, but it got all of us to at least try and experiment with things. Now with the drake nerfed, if I was a new pilot starting now, I would read the forums and never bother to get very good with shields, I would just go straight to armor tanking and skip a lot of stuff. Ditto for skipping missile technologies. In the larger combat battles, missiles and shields were never as good as blasters and armor tanking, so now CCP has made all of those things even more irrelevant.
In real life everything is not perfectly balanced, and in eve I thought they had a nice balance to the imbalances. Now I think we shall miss that. Now as I read one poster say, everything will be much more cookie-cutter, and I have to agree 100%. Previously we knew we were making a bad long term decision to get a good fit into the drake, but we lived with it for the immediate utility. |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |