Originally by: Nafri

---

Originally by: Hast

---

Originally by: Nafri

---

Originally by: Hast

---

Originally by: Nafri

---

Originally by: mahhy

---

Edited by: mahhy on 06/08/2005 17:24:44

Originally by: ParMizaN

---

Clearly it was not intended for a fully armed pos to shoot at drones instead of players.

---

You could just as easily assume that CCP did not intend for POS turrets to 1 or 2 shot a BS, and they knew that we'd eventually figure out that using drones as a distraction allowed a ship to last a little longer

Personally I'm expecting that CPP will class this as an exploit until they can code turrets not to target drones.

edit: that doesn't mean I agree that its an exploit, but theres no arguing with CCP heh.

But since the drones never did any damage to the shield, why recharge it?

---

reinforced mode was bugged, and 5 achieved it with the drone xploit

---

bwhahaahahhahaha. and I repeat bwhahaahahaha.

best. comment. ever.


Reinforced mode has always been buggy. Its not our drones that made reinforced mode more then two hours... and you dont know if it was just the timer or the actual time that it would have spent thats bugged either

And I always assumed that POS guns worked like sentry's with instalock...

---

Did I talked to you, or meant a comment?

As far as I know this was the reason the shields got recharged. So please dont post when you dont have the time to read the posts you dare to quote. Thx

---

the way you typed it it seemed that the reason the reinforced mode was two hours instead of 1.5 as xf claimed that there was clathrates for was our socalled exploiting

---

I just summed the 2 problem which the GM saw, when you guys would try to be calm and analyze situation, you would have easily seen it too

---

Originally by: JaegerX

---

In addition, I think POS guns should be placed outside the forcefield. (but that's another issue alltogeather.)

---

Originally by: Amthrianius

---

Sooooooooo now we do it without drones, just incase :/

Lets see if F12 works this time olyyy

---

Originally by: Amthrianius

---

Sooooooooo now we do it without drones, just incase :/

Lets see if F12 works this time olyyy

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

Ok first, whats been said between a GM and you in game is
confidential.
Posting that is against the rules of this forum.
And posting an exploit is against the forum rules and the TOS.

---

Originally by: Hue Jorgon

---

It would seem that GM's determined using Drones as a Starbase defence deterent is now an Exploit. Not because the drones create lag which make warping in and out difficult (for everyone), but because they provide additional targets for POS guns, thereby prolonging the life of attacking ships.

In this case I would suggest EVE simple remove drones from the game all together, because it seems every time someone comes up with a clever use for them it gets outlawed.

The incident in question resulted in a 60% shield insta-recharge. I would like to understand why/if this is sanctioned by DEV. In my opinion this along with other questionable actions, is a blantent evidence that GM's favour some groups over others.

I would like the EVE communities views on the ability for GM's to change the rules mid conflict.

---

Originally by: Dreez

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

Ok first, whats been said between a GM and you in game is
confidential.
Posting that is against the rules of this forum.
And posting an exploit is against the forum rules and the TOS.

---

GM deciding whats an exploit and whats not is also against the
rules, CCPs own rules - hence the GM broke this rule when he
commited this act.

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

Originally by: Dreez

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

Ok first, whats been said between a GM and you in game is
confidential.
Posting that is against the rules of this forum.
And posting an exploit is against the forum rules and the TOS.

---

GM deciding whats an exploit and whats not is also against the
rules, CCPs own rules - hence the GM broke this rule when he
commited this act.

---

And posting this is still against forum rules and the tos.
Anything more i must explain?

---

Originally by: Vlandarr

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

Originally by: Dreez

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

Ok first, whats been said between a GM and you in game is
confidential.
Posting that is against the rules of this forum.
And posting an exploit is against the forum rules and the TOS.

---

GM deciding whats an exploit and whats not is also against the
rules, CCPs own rules - hence the GM broke this rule when he
commited this act.

---

And posting this is still against forum rules and the tos.
Anything more i must explain?

---

I believe you should climb down off your high horse stop crying and being a bitter little fanboi and read the full thread there you will notice that this thread had been locked by a mod (who follows and enforces the rules you are *****ing about) and then unlocked. Obviously it was unlocked as it did not breach any of the rules.

So stop crying and stfu the mods decide what its what on these forums not you.

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

9. Private communication between the Game Masters, Eve Team members, moderators and administrators of the forum and the forum users is not to be made public on these forums or by any other venue.
You are not permitted to publicize any private correspondence (including petitions) received from any of the aforementioned.

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

Edited by: Lodhi on 07/08/2005 00:20:48

Originally by: Vlandarr

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

Originally by: Dreez

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

Ok first, whats been said between a GM and you in game is
confidential.
Posting that is against the rules of this forum.
And posting an exploit is against the forum rules and the TOS.

---

GM deciding whats an exploit and whats not is also against the
rules, CCPs own rules - hence the GM broke this rule when he
commited this act.

---

And posting this is still against forum rules and the tos.
Anything more i must explain?

---

I believe you should climb down off your high horse stop crying and being a bitter little fanboi and read the full thread there you will notice that this thread had been locked by a mod (who follows and enforces the rules you are *****ing about) and then unlocked. Obviously it was unlocked as it did not breach any of the rules.

So stop crying and stfu the mods decide what its what on these forums not you.

---

9. Private communication between the Game Masters, Eve Team members, moderators and administrators of the forum and the forum users is not to be made public on these forums or by any other venue.
You are not permitted to publicize any private correspondence (including petitions) received from any of the aforementioned.

Yep im a fanboi i know.
Now stfu since ure post is:
A: Flame
B: Personal insult on me
And both are against forum rules.
Anything more u would like to add?

---

Originally by: GigaIndy

---

So its confirmed, 5ive did use the exploit i just posted about in the xetic whine thread.

ITs an exploit because it confuses the **** outa the POS.
AI is teh stupid.

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

Anything more u would like to add?

---

Originally by: Vlandarr

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

9. Private communication between the Game Masters, Eve Team members, moderators and administrators of the forum and the forum users is not to be made public on these forums or by any other venue.
You are not permitted to publicize any private correspondence (including petitions) received from any of the aforementioned.

---

I will give you 20mill isk if you can find 1 post with actual conversations between player and GMS.

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

Originally by: Vlandarr

---

Originally by: Lodhi

---

9. Private communication between the Game Masters, Eve Team members, moderators and administrators of the forum and the forum users is not to be made public on these forums or by any other venue.
You are not permitted to publicize any private correspondence (including petitions) received from any of the aforementioned.

---

I will give you 20mill isk if you can find 1 post with actual conversations between player and GMS.

---

Ok he dint post actuall LOG, but check first post were Hue Jorgon say's that a GM told that using drones as a Starbase defence deterent = Exploit.

And again:

9. Private communication between the Game Masters, Eve Team members, moderators and administrators of the forum and the forum users is not to be made public on these forums or by any other venue.
You are not permitted to publicize any private correspondence (including petitions) received from any of the aforementioned.

And what he posted is still aginst the rules, since he post's what a gm has told him.
Now about those 20m, send them to a the3654 corp...

---

Originally by: The Enslaver

---

Originally by: GigaIndy

---

So its confirmed, 5ive did use the exploit i just posted about in the xetic whine thread.

ITs an exploit because it confuses the **** outa the POS.
AI is teh stupid.

---

Sorry, let me guess:

a) Armor Hardeners are a known exploit
b) Armor Repairers are a known exploit
c) Armor Transferers are a known exploit
d) Activating a module on a control tower is a known exploit
e) Being on the same grid as a hostile POS is an exploit

Please tell me which one of the above is correct.

---

Originally by: GigaIndy

---

Asshat? I do believe you are Sir!

Drones Overload the tower, known exploit.

---