Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
728
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 17:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
on the mitani dot rag The Goons Evil Overlord wrote: Single Transferable Vote and You STV is the new voting system for CSM8, which means that 'overvotes' are a thing of the past. If I had run under a STV system for CSM7, my 10,058 votes would have translated into the top spot for me, as well as #2, 3 and 4 spots for whoever was under my ticket. I advocated against a STV system as I believe it would allow nullsec to completely rig the election with maximal efficiency; Two Step likewise warned against this. CSM8 will be a test of my Cassandra-like warnings. Organization wins elections. Nullsec blocs are the most organized entities in Eve, because the disorganized ones get destroyed. STV gives voters a roster of candidates to rank; your average unaligned voter in hisec will put in maybe one or two candidate names. Your average nullsec voter, motivated by his bloc and their incentives/whipping methods, will fill out the entire ballot based on a voting guide provided to him by his leadership.
IMHO I think it'll be worse for HI SEC representation then mittens predicted unless HI SECers actually go out & vote ( ha ) they will either have 1 or zero reps ( depending on if you think James 315 as being a HI SEC candidate which I don't , if so then 2 or 1 )
Only time will tell if my ( mittiani, and Two Steps ) predictions about CSM becomming a 'NULL only thing' which I often hear it described as in fleets but I think it can be constructively disscussed here in GD... Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2958
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 17:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
I love how he always has good intentions for the game, while all the stupid, hypocritical, jealous, sociopath carebears can't do anything else than calling him the devil himself and how he wants to destroy EvE. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1380
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 17:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
TELL us something NEW. I support Malcanis and Psychotic Monk for CSM8. |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
2747
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 17:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
The fact is that getting the HighSec player base to band together to do anything is like herding cats.
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
527
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 17:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5669
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 17:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
Good, we can get something done in the CSM for once. |

Daimar Lavode
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 18:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
I will stick with my past voting practice of clicking "abstain" to show that I am aware of the elections but don't believe they do anything for me or accomplish anything more meaningful than being a PR tool. |

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
515
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 18:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote: on the mitani dot rag The Goons Evil Overlord wrote: Single Transferable Vote and You STV is the new voting system for CSM8, which means that 'overvotes' are a thing of the past. If I had run under a STV system for CSM7, my 10,058 votes would have translated into the top spot for me, as well as #2, 3 and 4 spots for whoever was under my ticket. I advocated against a STV system as I believe it would allow nullsec to completely rig the election with maximal efficiency; Two Step likewise warned against this. CSM8 will be a test of my Cassandra-like warnings. Organization wins elections. Nullsec blocs are the most organized entities in Eve, because the disorganized ones get destroyed. STV gives voters a roster of candidates to rank; your average unaligned voter in hisec will put in maybe one or two candidate names. Your average nullsec voter, motivated by his bloc and their incentives/whipping methods, will fill out the entire ballot based on a voting guide provided to him by his leadership.
IMHO I think it'll be worse for HI SEC representation then mittens predicted unless HI SECers actually go out & vote ( ha ) they will either have 1 or zero reps ( depending on if you think James 315 as being a HI SEC candidate which I don't , if so then 2 or 1 ) Only time will tell if my ( mittiani, and Two Steps ) predictions about CSM becomming a 'NULL only thing' which I often hear it described as in fleets but I think it can be constructively disscussed here in GD...
Does anyone really care anymore? Except for the Mittens contingent of course.
CSM is a joke, a way for CCP to claim they are involving the player base, while paying off a few players who they think help drive the game. What has come from the CSM that is actually in the game? Other than fluff of course.
And if null is so highly represented why has 0.0 been broken for years, and nothing done about it? 
The single biggest danger to EVE is the proliferation of ALTS! Kill an alt today!
Petition for a Minimum bounty of 10 mil. Prevent useless bounties!
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1500
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 18:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:I love how he always has good intentions for the game, while all the stupid, hypocritical, jealous, sociopath carebears can't do anything else than calling him the devil himself and how he wants to destroy EvE.
It's because those carebears are too narrow mindedly self interested to see or care about the big picture. That makes them so easy to beat at , well, everything lol.
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1231
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 18:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
Obviously, the answer is to vote for me  Steve Ronuken for CSM 8 Handy tools and SDE conversions Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
|

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
728
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 18:32:00 -
[11] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Good, we can get something done in the CSM for once.
lol CSM & getting something done in the same sentence   Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
728
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 18:37:00 -
[12] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:The fact is that getting the HighSec player base to band together to do anything is like herding cats.
Well didn't that spoon throwing Dutch chic get hi sec kitties banded together enough to get herself voted in? Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
743
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 18:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
CSM is a joke, and I'll never place a vote... I'm not entirely clear on the point of this, but I do have a sudden urge to jump in a catalyst and blow up a miner. Twitter! - @AzamiNevinyrall I'm half expecting a ban for this post. |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
1034
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 18:53:00 -
[14] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:The fact is that getting the HighSec player base to band together to do anything is like herding cats.
Herding cats is easy: Open a can of tuna in the place where you want the cats to be.
Hi-Sec'ers, on the other hand, are magnetic mono-poles. They repel each other violently, so can consequently can only go in opposition of their own best interests.
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
3781
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 18:57:00 -
[15] - Quote
I'm not sure what people expect the CSM to "get done".
Their function is to act as a sounding board for CCP, to provide constructive feed back and lend a focus and face to the opinions of the community.
They aren't there to dictate policy to CCP. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
1036
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 18:59:00 -
[16] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:I'm not sure what people expect the CSM to "get done".
Their function is to act as a sounding board for CCP, to provide constructive feed back and lend a focus and face to the opinions of the community.
They aren't there to dictate policy to CCP. You are correct, Sir.
But when has that ever mattered in EVE-O forums? Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1381
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:01:00 -
[17] - Quote
"CSM Member" is a position that bloggers who think they're awesome "communicators" aspire to. I support Malcanis and Psychotic Monk for CSM8. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
3782
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:06:00 -
[18] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:"CSM Member" is a position that bloggers who think they're awesome "communicators" aspire to.
Yep, which makes sense. Eloquent communication, both to CCP and to the community is pretty much the name of the game. That and a solid understanding not only of the game mechanics, but of how people use (or will use) them. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Angelique Duchemin
Serenity Prime Kraken.
273
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
CCP is well aware of how the CSM is shifted in favour of nullsec.
CCP's number one priority is to keep all players "comfortable" to the degree they can without scaring away any specific group and they would never let the CSM jeopardize the subscription income brought in by the high sec players.
the CSM is a simple PR tool and will never have any actual saying in the game. The planning and running of this game is done on a white board at CCP. It's done by analysing server statistics and server data that that the CSM doesn't even have access to in the first place.
Yes the CSM will be run by nullsec but the CSM is a joke and the punchline remains that people will work their butts off and spend billions of ISK to gather votes into a position of no authority. It's the high-school student council all over again.
I'm not sure who the joke hits the hardest. The people who "win" the CSM or the doomsayers who worry about what they might do with their supposed "power" We miss you Saede. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1382
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:"CSM Member" is a position that bloggers who think they're awesome "communicators" aspire to.  Yep, which makes sense. Eloquent communication, both to CCP and to the community is pretty much the name of the game. That and a solid understanding not only of the game mechanics, but of how people use (or will use) them. Not sure if you missed the sarcasm or detected it and cleverly rebutted with additional sarcasm. <_< I support Malcanis and Psychotic Monk for CSM8. |
|

Gotch Urarse
113
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:11:00 -
[21] - Quote
silens vesica wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:The fact is that getting the HighSec player base to band together to do anything is like herding cats.
Herding cats is easy: Open a can of tuna in the place where you want the cats to be. Hi-Sec'ers, on the other hand, are magnetic mono-poles. They repel each other violently, so can consequently can only go in opposition of their own best interests.
maybe if there was only one ice belt in hi-sec... |

Whitehound
1312
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:11:00 -
[22] - Quote
Those who do not like the system can try beating it by getting the most votes. If this is too much effort then they are doing it wrong. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1382
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:12:00 -
[23] - Quote
Angelique Duchemin wrote:CCP ... they would never let the CSM jeopardize the subscription income brought in by the high sec players. Implying that high-sec players are a majority that are not majorly WH, low-, and null-sec alts. I support Malcanis and Psychotic Monk for CSM8. |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
1139
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:16:00 -
[24] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Those who do not like the system can try beating it by getting the most votes. If this is too much effort then they are doing it wrong. Beating the system by submitting to it? That makes no sense at all.
Only way to express your displeasure with the CSM its system is to vote abstain. Mining Overhaul Nothing changed since 2008. |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
1040
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:17:00 -
[25] - Quote
Gotch Urarse wrote:silens vesica wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:The fact is that getting the HighSec player base to band together to do anything is like herding cats.
Herding cats is easy: Open a can of tuna in the place where you want the cats to be. Hi-Sec'ers, on the other hand, are magnetic mono-poles. They repel each other violently, so can consequently can only go in opposition of their own best interests. maybe if there was only one ice belt in hi-sec... Gods... James 315 would spoodge. And so would gankers of every stripe. It'd be 'Burn Jita' all day, every day.
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Angelique Duchemin
Serenity Prime Kraken.
274
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:18:00 -
[26] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Angelique Duchemin wrote:CCP ... they would never let the CSM jeopardize the subscription income brought in by the high sec players. Implying that high-sec players are a majority that are not majorly WH, low-, and null-sec alts.
CCP doesn't have to cater to either null or high. They can just do what they do now. Leave it like it is and get both incomes.
We miss you Saede. |

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2963
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:19:00 -
[27] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Whitehound wrote:Those who do not like the system can try beating it by getting the most votes. If this is too much effort then they are doing it wrong. Beating the system by submitting to it? That makes no sense at all. Only way to express your displeasure with the CSM its system is to vote abstain. Which is not true at all. Democracy is bullshit from the getgo, but not voting at all just signals: Hey, do whatever you want. We don't care about us anyways. |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
728
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:20:00 -
[28] - Quote
Angelique Duchemin wrote:CCP is well aware of how the CSM is shifted in favour of nullsec.
CCP's number one priority is to keep all players "comfortable" to the degree they can without scaring away any specific group and they would never let the CSM jeopardize the subscription income brought in by the high sec players.
I take it you base this premise of CCP Infallability because of CCP's awesomeness & spectacluar history of never making anything unbalanced 
I do believe it was CCP Soundwave in a Ten Ton Hammer Interview that derailed the ideals of anyone in Eve getting 'too comfortable' and promotes mixing things up ( doctorines, mechanics, ships,etc.. ) every so often Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
3783
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:20:00 -
[29] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:"CSM Member" is a position that bloggers who think they're awesome "communicators" aspire to.  Yep, which makes sense. Eloquent communication, both to CCP and to the community is pretty much the name of the game. That and a solid understanding not only of the game mechanics, but of how people use (or will use) them. Not sure if you missed the sarcasm or detected it and cleverly rebutted with additional sarcasm. <_< I "saw" your sarcasm and raised you a "but that's not actually a bad thing". To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Whitehound
1312
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:28:00 -
[30] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Whitehound wrote:Those who do not like the system can try beating it by getting the most votes. If this is too much effort then they are doing it wrong. Beating the system by submitting to it? That makes no sense at all. Only way to express your displeasure with the CSM its system is to vote abstain. I was actually referring to the Single Transferable Vote as it was quoted in the OP.
I personally do not vote for the CSM, because the only candidates I know happen to be players who I do not see myself represented by. I then do not share the fear of high-sec being under-represented. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |
|

Alara IonStorm
4677
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:29:00 -
[31] - Quote
Organization is the greatest skill in EVE, it dominates all other when it comes to power and influence.
Just the fact that so many share the same channel is in itself the best tool for getting your guy elected. Null Sec can exert influence on Hi Sec with ganks and market manipulation and wars while the reverse can not and it sure isn't because Hi-Seccers are pacifists. Lots of Hi-Seccers can fight fine, it is because there is no unifying force to united the masses and probably never will be.
Why? Well there are a lot of Hi Sec Corps who do get powerful, so they have 100 members, they then join with 8 more corps to get 500 members and are looking into wormholes and low sec and defending from war. At some point they notice that they are no longer a Mom and Pop operation and in search of greater opportunities they set them self up in wait for it... Null Sec. Or Wormholes some times.
Hi Sec isn't inducive to power because all the Hi Sec people who can organize themselves do and then they leave. So like the real world if you want to influence elections get organized. |

Destru Kaneda
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
196
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:37:00 -
[32] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Only way to express your displeasure with the CSM its system is to vote abstain.
Only way? Yes, big changes happen from a dissenting minority doing practically nothing. Wait, that doesn't sound right.
If you really wanted to send a message you'd run as an abstaining candidate, get all the like-minded people to vote for you, somehow win the election and then tell CCP to sit and spin.
But it would mean actually doing something, so **** that. Music for robots, geeks, hackers, and nerds. Nerdiest homepage on the internet? |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
729
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:44:00 -
[33] - Quote
Destru Kaneda wrote:Only way to express your displeasure with the CSM its system is to vote abstain.
That is one reason why I believe Compulsary Sufferage should be instituted into these elelections so we get a truer idea of how many share your displeasure or just don't know any better. Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1383
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:55:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:"CSM Member" is a position that bloggers who think they're awesome "communicators" aspire to.  Yep, which makes sense. Eloquent communication, both to CCP and to the community is pretty much the name of the game. That and a solid understanding not only of the game mechanics, but of how people use (or will use) them. Not sure if you missed the sarcasm or detected it and cleverly rebutted with additional sarcasm. <_< I "saw" your sarcasm and raised you a "but that's not actually a bad thing". Except when said blogger has an over-inflated sense of their "communication" skills. Also, the bolded part makes me laugh even though I now realize we're not talking about the same person. I support Malcanis and Psychotic Monk for CSM8. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
3786
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 20:27:00 -
[35] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:"CSM Member" is a position that bloggers who think they're awesome "communicators" aspire to.  Yep, which makes sense. Eloquent communication, both to CCP and to the community is pretty much the name of the game. That and a solid understanding not only of the game mechanics, but of how people use (or will use) them. Not sure if you missed the sarcasm or detected it and cleverly rebutted with additional sarcasm. <_< I "saw" your sarcasm and raised you a "but that's not actually a bad thing". Except when said blogger has an over-inflated sense of their "communication" skills. Also, the bolded part makes me laugh even though I now realize we're not talking about the same person. I'll freely admit some are much better at all of the above than others.  To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
729
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 21:18:00 -
[36] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Why? Well there are a lot of Hi Sec Corps who do get powerful, so they have 100 members, they then join with 8 more corps to get 500 members and are looking into wormholes and low sec and defending from war. At some point they notice that they are no longer a Mom and Pop operation and in search of greater opportunities they set them self up in wait for it... Null Sec. Or Wormholes some times.
Hi Sec isn't inducive to power because all the Hi Sec people who can organize themselves do and then they leave.
While I think this is 1 reason why HI SEC isn'tinductive to large organizations I don't hink its the only one...
- NULL SEC is by game mechanics design for large organizations to afford Titans & supers & to fend off large Mongo hordes.
- Industrial/mining HI SEC corps are disadvantaged from joining/forming large corps because itmales them bigger targets for war decc'ing
- Incursioners' HI SEC corps are disadvantaged from joining/forming large corps because it makes them bigger targets for war decc'ing
etc
Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7143
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 23:13:00 -
[37] - Quote
why do you capitalize "hisec" ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Dave Stark
2063
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 23:16:00 -
[38] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315.
i'm going to laugh so hard if he gets on to the CSM. Want miners to move from high sec to null sec? Then give them a reason to join player corps, and stop null sec grav sites being worth less isk/hour than high sec asteroid belts. Really isn't difficult. |

Angelique Duchemin
Serenity Prime Kraken.
279
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 23:59:00 -
[39] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Angelique Duchemin wrote:CCP is well aware of how the CSM is shifted in favour of nullsec.
CCP's number one priority is to keep all players "comfortable" to the degree they can without scaring away any specific group and they would never let the CSM jeopardize the subscription income brought in by the high sec players.
I take it you base this premise of CCP Infallability because of CCP's awesomeness & spectacluar history of never making anything unbalanced 
No I base it on Null sec players being the biggest moaners over how things are now but at the same time being the players least likely to leave the game for another game.
Catering to the null sec community at the cost of the high sec community doesn't make sense financially because the null sec players aren't going anywhere but the high sec players are a flaky group of mixed industrialists, skittish miners, mission runners and new players. If they are fed to the null sec wolves, CCP could stand to lose a great deal of money.
We miss you Saede. |

Mike Mulder
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 00:01:00 -
[40] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. i'm going to laugh so hard if he gets on to the CSM.
Actually, James decided today to not run for CSM. |
|

Bane Veradun
Black Sun Dawning
9
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 00:05:00 -
[41] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315.
Too bad he is in the pockets of nulsec idealism. A lion that needs his prey to lay down in front of him, is no lion at all. He's a pet. |

Toshiroma McDiesel
Lupus Draconis Dragehund
104
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 00:05:00 -
[42] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:And if null is so highly represented why has 0.0 been broken for years, and nothing done about it? 
You are making a huge mistake thinking that Null players actually want anything in Null changed. I"m not really the Evil One, I'm just his answering service. |

dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep Silent Requiem
69
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 01:30:00 -
[43] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315.
I laughed. He pulled out because, 'WAAAA NDA means I can't nerf anything, and now CCP picks who goes to Iceland so I'm going to throw in my towel and not even bother.'
The guy is a joke who is good for some tears on his blog, but most of the other stuff he talks about is like the ramblings of a madman. I personally have nothing against him and the gameplay he inspires, but he certainly isn't the sort of person who would get votes from anyone in high sec. |

Dave Stark
2064
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 01:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
Mike Mulder wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. i'm going to laugh so hard if he gets on to the CSM. Actually, James decided today to not run for CSM.
saves himself the embarrassment of having nobody vote for him, i guess. Want miners to move from high sec to null sec? Then give them a reason to join player corps, and stop null sec grav sites being worth less isk/hour than high sec asteroid belts. Really isn't difficult. |

Angelique Duchemin
Serenity Prime Kraken.
279
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 01:56:00 -
[45] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Mike Mulder wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. i'm going to laugh so hard if he gets on to the CSM. Actually, James decided today to not run for CSM. saves himself the embarrassment of having nobody vote for him, i guess.
I get the same feeling. He has built himself a house of cards consisting solely of fragile e-genitalia. I doubt he has the fortitude to run without being sure of winning. We miss you Saede. |

Oxandrolone
Bite Me inc Bitten.
164
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 02:17:00 -
[46] - Quote
high secers can barely organize their own ship fits let alone a voteing bloc. there either super casual or just bad players, why else would they live in highsec? |

Frying Doom
1995
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 02:22:00 -
[47] - Quote
dark heartt wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. I laughed. He pulled out because, 'WAAAA NDA means I can't nerf anything, and now CCP picks who goes to Iceland so I'm going to throw in my towel and not even bother.' The guy is a joke who is good for some tears on his blog, but most of the other stuff he talks about is like the ramblings of a madman. I personally have nothing against him and the gameplay he inspires, but he certainly isn't the sort of person who would get votes from anyone in high sec. While I do find James and his cronies a joke
I do not find the idea that CCP can chose the 5 going to Iceland a joke.
It was a massive hit to the players power within the CSM
And frankly I think we can save time by just refering to those people as the brown nosing 5. We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault. Stupid Signature Broke
|

dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep Silent Requiem
69
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 02:26:00 -
[48] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:dark heartt wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. I laughed. He pulled out because, 'WAAAA NDA means I can't nerf anything, and now CCP picks who goes to Iceland so I'm going to throw in my towel and not even bother.' The guy is a joke who is good for some tears on his blog, but most of the other stuff he talks about is like the ramblings of a madman. I personally have nothing against him and the gameplay he inspires, but he certainly isn't the sort of person who would get votes from anyone in high sec. While I do find James and his cronies a joke I do not find the idea that CCP can chose the 5 going to Iceland a joke. It was a massive hit to the players power within the CSM And frankly I think we can save time by just refering to those people as the brown nosing 5.
And yet it would allow them to actually reward those who put effort into the CSM, so people who are just troll candidates like Darius III won't get elected into a spot where they can do nothing and still go to Iceland. It's not as ideal as the CSM voting on it, but it's better than that. |

Andracin
Sickology
68
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 02:31:00 -
[49] - Quote
IMO it don't matter who gets on the CSM. They go tell CCP things CCP already knows because the Devs read the forums too, CCP says "thanks for all the help" and then usually end the meetings by either saying they don't have the code to fix the issues or their working on it some time soon. CCP then does whatever they are going to do cause its their game. At the end of the day and the CSM is a way to make players feel good about having a voice. Much like voting new politicians to congress changes U.S. policy... |

Frying Doom
1995
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 02:45:00 -
[50] - Quote
dark heartt wrote:Frying Doom wrote:dark heartt wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. I laughed. He pulled out because, 'WAAAA NDA means I can't nerf anything, and now CCP picks who goes to Iceland so I'm going to throw in my towel and not even bother.' The guy is a joke who is good for some tears on his blog, but most of the other stuff he talks about is like the ramblings of a madman. I personally have nothing against him and the gameplay he inspires, but he certainly isn't the sort of person who would get votes from anyone in high sec. While I do find James and his cronies a joke I do not find the idea that CCP can chose the 5 going to Iceland a joke. It was a massive hit to the players power within the CSM And frankly I think we can save time by just refering to those people as the brown nosing 5. And yet it would allow them to actually reward those who put effort into the CSM, so people who are just troll candidates like Darius III won't get elected into a spot where they can do nothing and still go to Iceland. It's not as ideal as the CSM voting on it, but it's better than that. Do you mean as apposed to the last 2 CSM secretaries who haven't done their jobs?
So no it will not reward hard work, it will reward those who play the game, and pucker up. We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault. Stupid Signature Broke
|
|

Frying Doom
1995
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 02:47:00 -
[51] - Quote
Andracin wrote:IMO it don't matter who gets on the CSM. They go tell CCP things CCP already knows because the Devs read the forums too, CCP says "thanks for all the help" and then usually end the meetings by either saying they don't have the code to fix the issues or their working on it some time soon. CCP then does whatever they are going to do cause its their game. At the end of the day and the CSM is a way to make players feel good about having a voice. Much like voting new politicians to congress changes U.S. policy... You should check out more of the US laws.
Adding new people to congress makes a big change, a change in the number of people certain laws can no longer effect. We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault. Stupid Signature Broke
|

Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts Hegemonous Pandorum
117
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 02:53:00 -
[52] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. i'm going to laugh so hard if he gets on to the CSM.
James has taken his hat out of the race. He has decided that the candidacy would negatively affect his blog and outreach by curtailing what information he can post about. |

Angelique Duchemin
Serenity Prime Kraken.
280
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 02:58:00 -
[53] - Quote
dark heartt wrote:Frying Doom wrote:dark heartt wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. I laughed. He pulled out because, 'WAAAA NDA means I can't nerf anything, and now CCP picks who goes to Iceland so I'm going to throw in my towel and not even bother.' The guy is a joke who is good for some tears on his blog, but most of the other stuff he talks about is like the ramblings of a madman. I personally have nothing against him and the gameplay he inspires, but he certainly isn't the sort of person who would get votes from anyone in high sec. While I do find James and his cronies a joke I do not find the idea that CCP can chose the 5 going to Iceland a joke. It was a massive hit to the players power within the CSM And frankly I think we can save time by just refering to those people as the brown nosing 5. And yet it would allow them to actually reward those who put effort into the CSM, so people who are just troll candidates like Darius III won't get elected into a spot where they can do nothing and still go to Iceland. It's not as ideal as the CSM voting on it, but it's better than that.
The spirit of democracy is that the will of the people comes first. Regardless of who they choose as their representatives. They people cannot vote "wrong" on who represents their will in power.
But with CCP pulling every single string to begin with I just wish they would throw out this farce of an election and just pick the candidates themselves.
Super spikinator wrote:James has taken his hat out of the race. He has decided that the candidacy would negatively affect his blog and outreach by curtailing what information he can post about.
Huh, really. I'll give him partial credit for the accuracy of that prediction. Maybe I underestimated him. We miss you Saede. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7145
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 02:59:00 -
[54] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Do you mean as apposed to the last 2 CSM secretaries who haven't done their jobs?
So no it will not reward hard work, it will reward those who play the game, and pucker up.
I hope you're not talking about Two Step because he's been a goddamn excellent secretary. ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Frying Doom
1995
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 03:06:00 -
[55] - Quote
Andski wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Do you mean as apposed to the last 2 CSM secretaries who haven't done their jobs?
So no it will not reward hard work, it will reward those who play the game, and pucker up. I hope you're not talking about Two Step because he's been a goddamn excellent secretary. Would you like to back that up with actual proof besides the minutes as the secretaries job is a hell of a lot more than just that. We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault. Stupid Signature Broke
|

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
1050
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 03:52:00 -
[56] - Quote
This thread is delivering giggles. Keep it up folks, I can use 'em.  Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
735
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 04:00:00 -
[57] - Quote
Mike Mulder wrote:
Actually, James decided today to not run for CSM.
This adds credence to those that think Jame315 is mittans alt Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |

dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep Silent Requiem
70
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 04:29:00 -
[58] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Mike Mulder wrote:
Actually, James decided today to not run for CSM.
This adds credence to those that think Jame315 is mittans alt
Do people actually think that? Seriously? |

Alara IonStorm
4682
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 04:47:00 -
[59] - Quote
dark heartt wrote:DarthNefarius wrote: This adds credence to those that think Jame315 is mittans alt
Do people actually think that? Seriously? See the C in this Photo. It proves that James is a prop of Mittani. The evidence is right there.
|

Sentamon
781
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 05:38:00 -
[60] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:I love how he always has good intentions for the game, while all the stupid, hypocritical, jealous, sociopath carebears can't do anything else than calling him the devil himself and how he wants to destroy EvE.
Never trust a Goon. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |
|

dexington
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
634
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 07:30:00 -
[61] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:IMHO I think it'll be worse for HI SEC representation then mittens predicted...
Who seriously care... don't get me wrong, i like the idea of the csm it's a cool eve gimmick, but it's really nothing more.
They are no say in the development of eve, if they did null would be in a lot better shape, it's nothing more then PR. I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |

Liafcipe9000
Smeghead Empire
1732
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 08:03:00 -
[62] - Quote
solution: VOTE FOR ALL THE CANDIDATES \ / |

Dave Stark
2065
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:22:00 -
[63] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Solstice Project wrote:I love how he always has good intentions for the game, while all the stupid, hypocritical, jealous, sociopath carebears can't do anything else than calling him the devil himself and how he wants to destroy EvE. Never trust a Goon.
quite.
but you can't disagree on the fact that no matter what you think of goons, they are the home to some of the brightest and most innovative players in eve. i often think that's why they're the victim of such hate.
i like the goons, personally. still, i wouldn't trust them. Want miners to move from high sec to null sec? Then give them a reason to join player corps, and stop null sec grav sites being worth less isk/hour than high sec asteroid belts. Really isn't difficult. |

Frying Doom
1997
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:25:00 -
[64] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Sentamon wrote:Solstice Project wrote:I love how he always has good intentions for the game, while all the stupid, hypocritical, jealous, sociopath carebears can't do anything else than calling him the devil himself and how he wants to destroy EvE. Never trust a Goon. quite. but you can't disagree on the fact that no matter what you think of goons, they are the home to some of the brightest and most innovative players in eve. i often think that's why they're the victim of such hate. i like the goons, personally. still, i wouldn't trust them. They remind me of a Used car dealer I used to know. Smart as a tac, friendly as hell, real nice guy.
But I wouldn't trust him with a dollar of mine. We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault. Stupid Signature Broke
|

Dave Stark
2065
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:30:00 -
[65] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Sentamon wrote:Solstice Project wrote:I love how he always has good intentions for the game, while all the stupid, hypocritical, jealous, sociopath carebears can't do anything else than calling him the devil himself and how he wants to destroy EvE. Never trust a Goon. quite. but you can't disagree on the fact that no matter what you think of goons, they are the home to some of the brightest and most innovative players in eve. i often think that's why they're the victim of such hate. i like the goons, personally. still, i wouldn't trust them. They remind me of a Used car dealer I used to know. Smart as a tac, friendly as hell, real nice guy. But I wouldn't trust him with a dollar of mine.
sounds about right, to be honest. Want miners to move from high sec to null sec? Then give them a reason to join player corps, and stop null sec grav sites being worth less isk/hour than high sec asteroid belts. Really isn't difficult. |

March rabbit
No Name No Pain
590
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:32:00 -
[66] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Solstice Project wrote:I love how he always has good intentions for the game, while all the stupid, hypocritical, jealous, sociopath carebears can't do anything else than calling him the devil himself and how he wants to destroy EvE. It's because those carebears are too narrow mindedly self interested to see or care about the big picture. That makes them so easy to beat at , well, everything lol. can i haz so good "something" to smoke?  |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8239
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:41:00 -
[67] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote: on the mitani dot rag The Goons Evil Overlord wrote: Single Transferable Vote and You STV is the new voting system for CSM8, which means that 'overvotes' are a thing of the past. If I had run under a STV system for CSM7, my 10,058 votes would have translated into the top spot for me, as well as #2, 3 and 4 spots for whoever was under my ticket. I advocated against a STV system as I believe it would allow nullsec to completely rig the election with maximal efficiency; Two Step likewise warned against this. CSM8 will be a test of my Cassandra-like warnings. Organization wins elections. Nullsec blocs are the most organized entities in Eve, because the disorganized ones get destroyed. STV gives voters a roster of candidates to rank; your average unaligned voter in hisec will put in maybe one or two candidate names. Your average nullsec voter, motivated by his bloc and their incentives/whipping methods, will fill out the entire ballot based on a voting guide provided to him by his leadership.
IMHO I think it'll be worse for HI SEC representation then mittens predicted unless HI SECers actually go out & vote ( ha ) they will either have 1 or zero reps ( depending on if you think James 315 as being a HI SEC candidate which I don't , if so then 2 or 1 ) Only time will tell if my ( mittiani, and Two Steps ) predictions about CSM becomming a 'NULL only thing' which I often hear it described as in fleets but I think it can be constructively disscussed here in GD...
There don't seem to be many "hi-sec" reps running in any case. Given that the deadline for submitting apps to CCP has passed, all the candidates must now have declared. Which of those who have declared would you consider a "hi sec" rep? Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8239
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:43:00 -
[68] - Quote
Bane Veradun wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. Too bad he is in the pockets of nulsec idealism.
Too bad he quit the race. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Dave Stark
2065
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:46:00 -
[69] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:There don't seem to be many "hi-sec" reps running in any case. Given that the deadline for submitting apps to CCP has passed, all the candidates must now have declared. Which of those who have declared would you consider a "hi sec" rep?
i don't understand why the people running for CSM are pigeon holed like that. i appreciate each player will have their area of expertise with regards to which security space they live in, be it null, empire, or wormhole space etc but surely it would be more logical for people to vote for candidates who simply understand game mechanics and have some idea of what balance is, rather than trying to push a CSM full of people who will just bias one section of eve over another? Want miners to move from high sec to null sec? Then give them a reason to join player corps, and stop null sec grav sites being worth less isk/hour than high sec asteroid belts. Really isn't difficult. |

Ai Shun
915
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:46:00 -
[70] - Quote
CCP should roll a D12 followed by a D10 divided by 2 ... Then a D8. That should give them the month, week and day of the election. A day before-hand they post it on the forums and we all go and vote for somebody.
Maybe that will save us from the self-same threads year after year after year after year after year.
Which, you know, is amusing as we get to see the same rot every time. But I'd much rather read about the people who forgot to train racial Cruisers to 4, yeah? Malcanis for CSM7 - here Malcanis on High-sec - here |
|

Dave Stark
2065
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:49:00 -
[71] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:CCP should roll a D12 followed by a D10 divided by 2 ... Then a D8. That should give them the month, week and day of the election. A day before-hand they post it on the forums and we all go and vote for somebody.
Maybe that will save us from the self-same threads year after year after year after year after year.
Which, you know, is amusing as we get to see the same rot every time. But I'd much rather read about the people who forgot to train racial Cruisers to 4, yeah?
that's fine you only need racial cruisers to 3. Want miners to move from high sec to null sec? Then give them a reason to join player corps, and stop null sec grav sites being worth less isk/hour than high sec asteroid belts. Really isn't difficult. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8239
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:53:00 -
[72] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Whitehound wrote:Those who do not like the system can try beating it by getting the most votes. If this is too much effort then they are doing it wrong. Beating the system by submitting to it? That makes no sense at all. Only way to express your displeasure with the CSM its system is to vote abstain.
It makes a hell of a lot more sense than trying to beat it by quitting. You know, like you're trying to.
Good luck with that. I'll be over there, actually getting things done. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8239
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:54:00 -
[73] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Malcanis wrote:There don't seem to be many "hi-sec" reps running in any case. Given that the deadline for submitting apps to CCP has passed, all the candidates must now have declared. Which of those who have declared would you consider a "hi sec" rep? i don't understand why the people running for CSM are pigeon holed like that...
Now you do.
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

pussnheels
The Fiction Factory
1049
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 10:09:00 -
[74] - Quote
Why even bother wwith this farce CSM was and always will be a PR tool for CCP aslong less than 20 % of elegible voters vote this will not change
CCP does what ever the pleases and the CSM will never have any influence in the descision making , not aslong as i said less than 20% of the voters even bother to vote I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8240
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 10:11:00 -
[75] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:Why even bother wwith this farce CSM was and always will be a PR tool for CCP aslong less than 20 % of elegible voters vote this will not change
CCP does what ever the pleases and the CSM will never have any influence in the descision making , not aslong as i said less than 20% of the voters even bother to vote
So what you're advising is: is don't vote and keep it a farce instead of voting and making it less of one?
Pussnheels, everyone. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
71
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 10:22:00 -
[76] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. i'm going to laugh so hard if he gets on to the CSM.
So, if I vote for him, despite better knowledge, I could sleep well with the knowledge that I helped make a person happy? There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper. |

Beckie DeLey
Living From Scraps
363
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 10:32:00 -
[77] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:surely it would be more logical for people to vote for candidates who simply understand game mechanics and have some idea of what balance is, rather than trying to push a CSM full of people who will just bias one section of eve over another?
Now you are just being reasonable. Stop that. So... i started an industry blog at www.derbk.com/eve There i am preparing a guide to all things related to manufacturing. Check it out!
|

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1088
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 10:56:00 -
[78] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Malcanis wrote:There don't seem to be many "hi-sec" reps running in any case. Given that the deadline for submitting apps to CCP has passed, all the candidates must now have declared. Which of those who have declared would you consider a "hi sec" rep? i don't understand why the people running for CSM are pigeon holed like that... Now you do.
Read the article.
Mittens for CSM8. This is not a signature. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8240
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 11:02:00 -
[79] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Malcanis wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Malcanis wrote:There don't seem to be many "hi-sec" reps running in any case. Given that the deadline for submitting apps to CCP has passed, all the candidates must now have declared. Which of those who have declared would you consider a "hi sec" rep? i don't understand why the people running for CSM are pigeon holed like that... Now you do. Read the article. Mittens for CSM8.
 Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
719
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 11:15:00 -
[80] - Quote
Debora Tsung wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. i'm going to laugh so hard if he gets on to the CSM. So, if I vote for him, despite better knowledge, I could sleep well with the knowledge that I helped make a person happy? James never submitted his application, so therefore you can save your laughter.
tl;dr? James isn't running.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
|

Apricot Baby
caldariprimeponyclub
21
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 11:19:00 -
[81] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Malcanis wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Malcanis wrote:There don't seem to be many "hi-sec" reps running in any case. Given that the deadline for submitting apps to CCP has passed, all the candidates must now have declared. Which of those who have declared would you consider a "hi sec" rep? i don't understand why the people running for CSM are pigeon holed like that... Now you do. Read the article. Mittens for CSM8. 
Good read, thanks for the link.
CSM Participation Reward Program - www.tinyurl.com/caldariprimeponyclub Earn rewards for taking part in this year's CSM Elections |

Spurty
V0LTA Verge of Collapse
829
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 11:41:00 -
[82] - Quote
My thinking:
Mittens wants to ruin the game: - why would someone that puts in an epic amount of energy in a game want it destroyed again? They don't. Their intentions are to make it better (even if that means making it worse for the average player).
Voting changes: - STV solves what issue again? Seems more like It intensifies the original issue by orders of magnitude if this declaration is correct. Isn't their a better way?
CSM is useless / doesn't represent me: - CSM might be toothless but at least they do exist and do pass messages from the collective back. Keep them!
How much advertising has CCP done on the new voting system? I only follow FBI feeds and news at login. But I do follow those two closely when possible --- GÇ£If you think this Universe is bad, you should see some of the others.GÇ¥ GÇò Philip K. **** |

Onomerous
Shockwave Innovations Shockwave Sovereign Industries
46
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 12:39:00 -
[83] - Quote
Spurty wrote:My thinking:
Mittens wants to ruin the game: - why would someone that puts in an epic amount of energy in a game want it destroyed again? They don't. Their intentions are to make it better (even if that means making it worse for the average player).
Voting changes: - STV solves what issue again? Seems more like It intensifies the original issue by orders of magnitude if this declaration is correct. Isn't their a better way?
CSM is useless / doesn't represent me: - CSM might be toothless but at least they do exist and do pass messages from the collective back. Keep them!
How much advertising has CCP done on the new voting system? I only follow FBI feeds and news at login. But I do follow those two closely when possible
I've seen that reasoning before and it doesn't make sense. Change better to different and I agree:
their intentions are to make it different (even if that means making it worse for the average player).
No doubt there are plenty running for the CSM who are willing to support ideas which only help their part of EVE while crapping on everyone else. They will carry a banner calling it 'a change to make EVE better'... yeah, and the world is flat!! |

Dave Stark
2069
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 12:40:00 -
[84] - Quote
Beckie DeLey wrote:Dave Stark wrote:surely it would be more logical for people to vote for candidates who simply understand game mechanics and have some idea of what balance is, rather than trying to push a CSM full of people who will just bias one section of eve over another? Now you are just being reasonable. Stop that.
sorry :( Want miners to move from high sec to null sec? Then give them a reason to join player corps, and stop null sec grav sites being worth less isk/hour than high sec asteroid belts. Really isn't difficult. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1507
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 12:51:00 -
[85] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Solstice Project wrote:I love how he always has good intentions for the game, while all the stupid, hypocritical, jealous, sociopath carebears can't do anything else than calling him the devil himself and how he wants to destroy EvE. It's because those carebears are too narrow mindedly self interested to see or care about the big picture. That makes them so easy to beat at , well, everything lol. can i haz so good "something" to smoke? 
You can smoke what I'm smoking easily. Just go outside, gather up some REALITY, roll it up in a fattie and smoke it. Problem solved.
Most high sec folks (the real ones, not my alts , of which their are many) are solo, casual and mostly PVE players. They don't usually give a flying fornication about anything except themselves and what they are doing.
"hi-sec" can't even organize enough to swat a fly (relatively speaking) like James 315. To busy crunching rocks, saving that dumb assed damsel for the 50,000th time or undercutting that other guy selling hardeners on the market by 0.01 isk......
|

Whitehound
1329
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 12:55:00 -
[86] - Quote
All this democracy stuff is nonsense. We need a king! Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

dexington
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
634
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 13:13:00 -
[87] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:All this democracy stuff is nonsense. We need a king!
when i'm king you'll be first against the wall I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |

Whitehound
1329
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 13:18:00 -
[88] - Quote
dexington wrote:Whitehound wrote:All this democracy stuff is nonsense. We need a king! when i'm king you'll be first against the wall So you would be king for a day. Then what? Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
362
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 14:01:00 -
[89] - Quote
Just ABOLISH the CSM.
Not really a solution that many people want, but it's the only solution that treats everyone equally -- which is where a sizeable amount of the bitching is rooted, in the "issue" of Equality.
Personally, I enjoy the scandal and the dramarama -- but all good things must come to an end. 
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Onomerous
Shockwave Innovations Shockwave Sovereign Industries
46
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 14:17:00 -
[90] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:March rabbit wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Solstice Project wrote:I love how he always has good intentions for the game, while all the stupid, hypocritical, jealous, sociopath carebears can't do anything else than calling him the devil himself and how he wants to destroy EvE. It's because those carebears are too narrow mindedly self interested to see or care about the big picture. That makes them so easy to beat at , well, everything lol. can i haz so good "something" to smoke?  You can smoke what I'm smoking easily. Just go outside, gather up some REALITY, roll it up in a fattie and smoke it. Problem solved. Most high sec folks (the real ones, not my alts , of which their are many) are solo, casual and mostly PVE players. They don't usually give a flying fornication about anything except themselves and what they are doing.
"hi-sec" can't even organize enough to swat a fly (relatively speaking) like James 315. To busy crunching rocks, saving that dumb assed damsel for the 50,000th time or undercutting that other guy selling hardeners on the market by 0.01 isk......
That is not just high sec players... |
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8241
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 14:49:00 -
[91] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Just ABOLISH the CSM. Not really a solution that many people want, but it's the only solution that treats everyone equally -- which is where a sizeable amount of the bitching is rooted, in the "issue" of Equality. Personally, I enjoy the scandal and the dramarama -- but all good things must come to an end. 
Ah, the old "If I'm not allowed to win, then no one should be allowed to play" argument.
As deserving of respect now as it was when I first heard it at the age of 2 at nursery school. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
1062
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 15:28:00 -
[92] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Just ABOLISH the CSM. Not really a solution that many people want, but it's the only solution that treats everyone equally -- which is where a sizeable amount of the bitching is rooted, in the "issue" of Equality. Personally, I enjoy the scandal and the dramarama -- but all good things must come to an end.  Well, all that, and the fact taht the CSM is pretty close to unique in the gaming industry. We get some (limilted, of course - and rightly so) input at the core of the company that holds our subscriptions.
Not many folks get even that level of access. So - People whinge and want to toss it away because it isn't their idea of perfect. Too bad. No one gets 'perfect' - ever. Take what we've got, and work to make it better.
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1509
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 15:38:00 -
[93] - Quote
Onomerous wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:March rabbit wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Solstice Project wrote:I love how he always has good intentions for the game, while all the stupid, hypocritical, jealous, sociopath carebears can't do anything else than calling him the devil himself and how he wants to destroy EvE. It's because those carebears are too narrow mindedly self interested to see or care about the big picture. That makes them so easy to beat at , well, everything lol. can i haz so good "something" to smoke?  You can smoke what I'm smoking easily. Just go outside, gather up some REALITY, roll it up in a fattie and smoke it. Problem solved. Most high sec folks (the real ones, not my alts , of which their are many) are solo, casual and mostly PVE players. They don't usually give a flying fornication about anything except themselves and what they are doing.
"hi-sec" can't even organize enough to swat a fly (relatively speaking) like James 315. To busy crunching rocks, saving that dumb assed damsel for the 50,000th time or undercutting that other guy selling hardeners on the market by 0.01 isk...... That is not just high sec players...
No it isn't, vast swaths of humanity think that way.....it just that most of them that both play EVE and post on it's forums live in high sec space .
|

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
741
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 16:38:00 -
[94] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Debora Tsung wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Hi-sec will get representation, James 315. i'm going to laugh so hard if he gets on to the CSM. So, if I vote for him, despite better knowledge, I could sleep well with the knowledge that I helped make a person happy? James never submitted his application, so therefore you can save your laughter. tl;dr? James isn't running.
/tinfoil hat
Well the word on the street is that mittens ALT James315 isn't in the running... not sure what lame ass excuse he's made up but I doubt he ever inteded to go through with it. The run up to the candidacy deadline was fun to watch as peeps screamed about James315's being on the CSM.... well played mittens, well played 
/tinfoil hat Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1089
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 16:55:00 -
[95] - Quote
The only thing worse than having the CSM, would be not having the CSM. This is not a signature. |

James Stag
Viziam Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 17:12:00 -
[96] - Quote
Sometimes i like to walk along the beach at night and take the sea air.
Theres really some very beautifull places dotted around the British countryside. Just gotta adventure beyond the urban sprawl.
Sometimes i take the dogs as they need to get excersise just like we do. Obesity in pets is a worrying problem amongst the richer nations of the world.
You should take a walk along your local strech of beach or through your local forest.
I hope you enjoy your time with nature as much i me. |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
2328
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 17:41:00 -
[97] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:I'm not sure what people expect the CSM to "get done".
Their function is to act as a sounding board for CCP, to provide constructive feed back and lend a focus and face to the opinions of the community.
They aren't there to dictate policy to CCP.
That is a very good summary of what the CSM does. |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
743
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 17:50:00 -
[98] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:I'm not sure what people expect the CSM to "get done".
Their function is to act as a sounding board for CCP, to provide constructive feed back and lend a focus and face to the opinions of the community.
They aren't there to dictate policy to CCP. That is a very good summary of what the CSM does.
You forgot to add CSM's function as a scapgoat & an fire extinguisher when higher up DEV's & CCP exec's screw up  Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
1066
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 18:12:00 -
[99] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:I'm not sure what people expect the CSM to "get done".
Their function is to act as a sounding board for CCP, to provide constructive feed back and lend a focus and face to the opinions of the community.
They aren't there to dictate policy to CCP. That is a very good summary of what the CSM does. You forgot to add CSM's function as a scapgoat & an fire extinguisher when higher up DEV's & CCP exec's screw up  That's more of an ad hoc function than a formal one.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |

Nikodiemus
Jokulhlaup
65
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 22:10:00 -
[100] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:Does anyone really care anymore? Except for the Mittens contingent of course. CSM is a joke, a way for CCP to claim they are involving the player base, while paying off a few players who they think help drive the game. What has come from the CSM that is actually in the game? Other than fluff of course. And if null is so highly represented why has 0.0 been broken for years, and nothing done about it? 
Define broken. Same power blocks//groups of players holding null and churning out isk and supers with moons? Working as intended nothing broken. |
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7161
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 23:33:00 -
[101] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:/tinfoil hat Well the word on the street is that mittens ALT James315 isn't in the running... not sure what lame ass excuse he's made up but I doubt he ever intended to go through with it. The run up to the candidacy deadline was fun to watch as peeps screamed about James315's being on the CSM would make them quit.... well played mittens, well played  /tinfoil hat
James 315 is James 315, not an alt of somebody else. He isn't running for the CSM because he realized why a position on the CSM would be highly incompatible with his office as the Supreme Protector of Halaima and Saviour of Highsec, understandably so. ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Xenharmonic1
The Scope Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 23:39:00 -
[102] - Quote
James 315 for chairman of the CSM! |

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
1175
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 23:51:00 -
[103] - Quote
Andski wrote:James 315 is James 315, not an alt of somebody else. He isn't running for the CSM because he realized why a position on the CSM would be highly incompatible with his office as the Supreme Protector of Halaima and Saviour of Highsec, understandably so.
What you meant to say was "Mittani can't be two CSMs at once."
Live Events are neither. |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
750
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 00:32:00 -
[104] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:Andski wrote:James 315 is James 315, not an alt of somebody else. He isn't running for the CSM because he realized why a position on the CSM would be highly incompatible with his office as the Supreme Protector of Halaima and Saviour of Highsec, understandably so. What you meant to say was "Mittani can't be two CSMs at once."
Why is he running around with another CSM candidates' ALTs name too?  Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |