Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Omnathious Deninard
The Scope Gallente Federation
1087
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 08:05:00 -
[61] - Quote
Don't use faction and dead space mods for the purpose of balancing ships. Second, seriously a DLA on a caldari ship lol. Ideas For Drone Improvement Repourpose Deep Space Scanner Probes |

Ravay Kanjus
EnvyDust
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 08:22:00 -
[62] - Quote
The DLA is there for when a warfare module is not. I had an extra high slot, and with that small of a drone bay, it's only going to have scout drones. Might as well augment damage to the targets orbiting at over 44km with the DLA. |

Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
93
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 08:27:00 -
[63] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:Don't use faction and dead space mods for the purpose of balancing ships.
That nails it pretty much. Can get a 100k EHP Cane I assume, given you'd fit the same mods on it you'd fit on a loki. (getting 94k EHP using meta 8 membranes and t2 rigs, INCLUDING FLEETED Boni [not links]) Resists are far crappier, but ye.
And for the price of most anom-running T3-setups, you could also just get a rattlesnkae or nightmare. Seems to be the same pricerange. |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
965
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 08:53:00 -
[64] - Quote
Oh that's why your DPS is so low. You're using Heavy Missiles instead of HAMs. Well you know a Tengu can hit out to 70km with HAMs and still do more DPS than either of your fits there, right? Also the Nighthawk can get about 750 DPS with HAMs, and a really good active tank with MWD. That's what I'd use, despite that lack of range bonuses. Oh god. |

Tauranon
Weeesearch
173
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 12:10:00 -
[65] - Quote
Ravay Kanjus wrote: [Tengu, level 5] Pithi A-Type Small Shield Booster Dread Guristas Shield Boost Amplifier Thermic Dissipation Field II EM Ward Field II EM Ward Field II
... cruiser sig. ...
Quote:
[Nighthawk, level 5 dps]
Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II
Medium Core Defense Field Purger II Medium Core Defense Field Purger II
... larger sig, slower ship, with sig increasing modules. ...
ie the tanks are only "equal" when being shot by cruiser dps sources and standing still. |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
1407
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 12:47:00 -
[66] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Oh that's why your DPS is so low. You're using Heavy Missiles instead of HAMs. Well you know a Tengu can hit out to 70km with HAMs and still do more DPS than either of your fits there, right?
Aren't glaring generalities fun?
Yes you can get out to 75km with Javelins if you want to use up all three rig slots on T2 and T1 cache fuel partition rigs.
taking that fit from page 3 and swapping a few things around (assault launchers, previously mentioned rigs)
You can get 590DPS with javelins at 75km with stats of 93.8m/152m/s
Playing with the same fit, you get 637DPS with Furies at 71km with stats of 98.3m/102m/s
Granted the HAM fit DPS will go up as ranges get shorter. But to simply claim it out DPS's the HML Tengu is only a partial truth. It would depend on your needs. The HML range starts at 71km and goes longer, the HAM fit maxes out at 75km. |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
970
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 12:58:00 -
[67] - Quote
So which one does more DPS?
Also;
Riot Girl wrote:more DPS than either of your fits there.
Ravay Kanjus wrote: in EFT the dps is 475 with all level 5 skills and 4 BCUs. The Nighthawk could get 446 with just 3 BCUs Yes, glaring generality. Oh god. |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
1407
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 13:31:00 -
[68] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:So which one does more DPS? Also; Riot Girl wrote:more DPS than either of your fits there. Ravay Kanjus wrote: in EFT the dps is 475 with all level 5 skills and 4 BCUs. The Nighthawk could get 446 with just 3 BCUs Yes, glaring generality.
Yea
T2 javelin ammo
Her fit shows t1 scourge.
Put Furies into her fit without modifcation and you get 637 DPS and 70km range
Apples and oranges.
My main other point is how you throw out a statement that a HAM tengu can hit to 75km without clarification, as if you can just take a tengu, throw some hams on it and bingo, uber range. When in fact you need over 120mil in rigs and T2 ammo to get that range. |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
970
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 13:52:00 -
[69] - Quote
Derath Ellecon wrote:Her fit shows t1 scourge. Yeah, that might be why her DPS sucks.
Quote:637 DPS and 70km range Yep, with inferior explosion radius, explosion velocity and rate of fire. Paper DPS is higher (with the ammo she neglected to fit), and maybe applied DPS is higher at that range too (I'm not going to check). So... 637 DPS Tengu. Awesome 
Quote:My main other point is how you throw out a statement that a HAM tengu can hit to 75km without clarification, as if you can just take a tengu, throw some hams on it and bingo, uber range. When in fact you need over 120mil in rigs and T2 ammo to get that range. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings, I can be so insensitive sometimes :3
Oh god. |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
1407
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 16:18:00 -
[70] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Yep, with inferior explosion radius, explosion velocity and rate of fire. Paper DPS is higher (with the ammo she neglected to fit), and maybe applied DPS is higher at that range too (I'm not going to check). So... 637 DPS Tengu. Awesome 
Already addressed that in my post above. If you take that fit and "HAM" it up you have to replace the rigs with 2 T2 and 1 T1 fuel rig to get that 75km range.
If you then take the fit and put rigors you get the numbers I posted, which are pretty close in explosion velocity and radius.
Riot Girl wrote:I'm sorry I hurt your feelings, I can be so insensitive sometimes :3
Didn't hurt my feelings at all. But it is extremely difficult to have any meaningful discussion when people throw out half truth facts without clarification.
You have already stated your belief that the Tengu is way overpowered (which it isn't). And then you throw out a partial truth which makes it sound more overpowered than it is (Yes you can hit 75km, but you have to dedicate all of your rig slots and use T2 rigs, and long range ammo to make it work).
As a comparative example, even as broken as the Cerberus is, without any extra rigs it can hit to 103KM with javelin ammo. With T2 fuel rigs that goes to 148km with assault missiles. |
|

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
70
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 16:29:00 -
[71] - Quote
Mike Whiite wrote:Please elabborate on how the Tengu is broken, I'm thrilled as what problems you say it has.
Insert whining about carebears doing level 4's
Also, hurr durr. |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
970
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 16:46:00 -
[72] - Quote
Derath Ellecon wrote:half truth facts I did no such thing. Any half truths were purely a product of your imagination for the sake of arguing with me.
Quote:You have already stated your belief that the Tengu is way overpowered (which it isn't). Is it normal for a Cruiser to have BS tank before taking mobility into consideration, capable of close to1000 DPS and applying damage out to 70km? If it's not overpowered, then I guess this is pretty common for many cruiser class ships, right?
Quote:And then you throw out a partial truth which makes it sound more overpowered than it is Partial truth? Either I lied or I didn't. Which is it?
Quote:As a comparative example, even as broken as the Cerberus is, without any extra rigs it can hit to 103KM with javelin ammo. With T2 fuel rigs that goes to 148km with assault missiles. Yeah. You forgot one minor detail there. Oh god. |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
1407
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 17:39:00 -
[73] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote: Is it normal for a Cruiser to have BS tank before taking mobility into consideration, capable of close to1000 DPS and applying damage out to 70km? If it's not overpowered, then I guess this is pretty common for many cruiser class ships, right?
I gotta have that fit!  |

Trevor Voss
State War Academy Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.31 17:56:00 -
[74] - Quote
I see a problem with T3 ships in nullsec with larger numbers because of their incredible HP and low sig. Bomber can easily destroy battleships, but they can't kill T3's unless you have 50 well hitting bombs I guess. OP?
If an alliance can field 300 Lokis, no one can stop them. They alpha nearly everything, while they don't have to worry about bombers. OP?
They can kite very much fleet comps because of their low sig = sig/speed tanking.
Correct me if i'm wrong. |

Mocam
EVE University Ivy League
278
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 01:59:00 -
[75] - Quote
Trevor Voss wrote:I see a problem with T3 ships in nullsec with larger numbers because of their incredible HP and low sig. Bomber can easily destroy battleships, but they can't kill T3's unless you have 50 well hitting bombs I guess. OP?
If an alliance can field 300 Lokis, no one can stop them. They alpha nearly everything, while they don't have to worry about bombers. OP?
They can kite very much fleet comps because of their low sig = sig/speed tanking.
Correct me if i'm wrong.
Um... a bit odd there isn't it? I thought bombers were to deal with bigger ships, not trivializing encounters with smaller ships.
You can do the same type of stunt, for massively less costs, with far less risks of SP loss and such using T2 ships.
300 HAC's can "alpha nearly everything" can't they? And a HAC also doesn't have the degree of concerns about bombs as BC's on up have.
I'm just wondering - who the hell is going to field 300 T3's like that for lulz? And if they do, who are the attacking that won't have the ability to field more proper counters than just a handful of bombers - bombers being built to do damage to BC's on up type craft? |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
970
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 05:14:00 -
[76] - Quote
Mocam wrote:I'm just wondering - who the hell is going to field 300 T3's like that for lulz? Russians.
Oh god. |

Incindir Mauser
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
223
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 06:01:00 -
[77] - Quote
Mike Adoulin wrote:Just about everybody agrees that the damn t3 strategic cruisers are broken.
*tanks armor and shield thermal resists to 99% and awaits the incoming flames*
No.
This post is bad and you should feel bad for posting it.
T3's have numerous balancing issues within their own ship class. Attempting to run concurrent comparisons to T2 HAC's or any other specialized T2 ship is going to run into you making lopsided comparisons and looking dumb. T3's, when purely fit with T2 mods are flat out worse than the T2 specialized ship.
With the exception of Caldari HAC's because everyone knows that Cerbs and Eagles are terrible beyond comparison. |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
971
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 06:47:00 -
[78] - Quote
Incindir Mauser wrote:T3's, when purely fit with T2 mods are flat out worse than the T2 specialized ship. Which HACs are better in their combat roles than T3s?
Oh god. |

DSpite Culhach
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
109
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 07:33:00 -
[79] - Quote
Roger McLoven wrote:Nerff Nerff Nerff.
Whole point of this game way back when was If a ship was overpowered you need more people to kill it.
All this game is now is nerfs.
Frigs should not be able to kill battleships.
If you spent billions on a ship it used to just own everything till a fleet came in and killed youl.
I have quit playing this game because of all the nerfs.
IF anything that should of beefed up some ships not nerf them..
Speed nerf missile nerfs ship nerfs nerf nerf nerf..
Mission nerfs isk nerfs...
I'm Done. I have 3 110 million skill point toons. Worthless.
Have to say I more happy now play othere games.. It's like not working a second job just to keep the accounts going in isk.
Enjoy the NEFS
MR NASH
This is a bit of an oversimplification, but yea ... EVE feels a tad weird sometimes.
I used to think that when a Battleship entered the field you would need to scramble quite a bit of stuff to take it out, rather then simply get very creative with a single frig fit. I suddenly woke up thinking I had a nightmare, then remembered I can't even fly Amarr Battleships. I add bits to this when I'm bored https://www.dropbox.com/s/foijsawsqolarom/EVE_Online.html |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
772
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 16:21:00 -
[80] - Quote
Goldensaver wrote:Also, 5 sub skills to V takes 20-25 days. For example, getting logi, HAC's, and Recon to V takes bloody forever in comparison
25 days for Recon 5 - I can't point with my proteus at 109km like with my lach with boosts , jam with my tengu like with my falcon, Web with loki like I can do with huggin or neut with legion like I can do with curse
25days for Logi 5 -tell me when was the last time you saw a T3 gang with T3 logistics and please screen it, I'd like to have a nice laugh.
Both being exponentially overpowered over T3's doing or capable to do same stuff.
DPS T3's? -wtf is the issue?? HACs are total complete and utter crap except Zealot, that's not T3's fault.
Goldensaver wrote:But by getting all subs to V (assuming they only buff the bad subs, and not nerf any) you'll get a ship that does all of that, AND BETTER for only 20-25 days
I just proved to you they don't, you're displacing the real problem, being Command ships worst than they should be and HACs total kitty shite.
You should train for all 4 of them, use them as you seem to be experienced with logis and recons then come again tell us your experience, you'd change your opinion for sure.
The only way to get your T3 really badass is with your toon fully TOP 5 skills trained, pirate implants in his head, strong combat boosters (25M+piece) and another T3 pilot with links/implants and probably named implants worth billions+faction fits. Then add tons of pimpy faction/officer stuff on your combat T3 and yes, you get a good ship. That's exactly what you can expect for this ship after that much effort (more than the cost of a super hull just for 2 skilled implants/fitted toons)
Flash news, not everyone flies those that way and the chances you ever get one or a gang of these is in low sec and calm null sec entries but you can be sure they gtfo asap as soon as they start seeing numbers climb, they only attack the week unless some very known players. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |
|

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Fatal Ascension
258
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 16:40:00 -
[81] - Quote
Trevor Voss wrote:I see a problem with T3 ships in nullsec with larger numbers because of their incredible HP and low sig. Bomber can easily destroy battleships, but they can't kill T3's unless you have 50 well hitting bombs I guess. OP?
If an alliance can field 300 Lokis, no one can stop them. They alpha nearly everything, while they don't have to worry about bombers. OP?
They can kite very much fleet comps because of their low sig = sig/speed tanking.
Correct me if i'm wrong.
Incorrect, tried massed Loki s in A ...even dual plated and boosted you get alpha'd by enough ships.
And they are slow compared to drakes, and the range isn't great with 720mm.
I still have a pair of them, they are great in groups of 20 but **** fleet hulls for a real fleet fight.
|

Majindoom Shi
We the Gankers
3
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 09:42:00 -
[82] - Quote
Some people seem to have gotten killed by some t3s. Maybe next time you won't jump in to that WH. But with the loss of sp and the price tag of a good fit T3 I think they are underpowered. Just cus you people are to scared to fly around with a big price tag that doesn't mean that a nerf is necessary. Go fly your drakes or canes and HTFU.. |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
973
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 10:28:00 -
[83] - Quote
I wonder if you'll still feel this way after the T3 tiericide. We can only wait and see. Oh god. |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
1411
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 15:27:00 -
[84] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:I wonder if you'll still feel this way after the T3 tiericide. We can only wait and see.
I'm more interested to see how the HAC balancing goes first. It seems largely that HAC's have been somewhat broken since their inception. A couple of them are decent, but many didn't see all that much use even before T3's were introduced.
By the way, still waiting to see a fit that can do everything you claim back on page 4.
|

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1338
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 15:52:00 -
[85] - Quote
OP, both of those suggestions are just ludicrous. Sure, Tengu needs a nerf (unforuntately), but the other three are already pretty weak so why bother? "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Fatal Ascension
258
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 17:27:00 -
[86] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:OP, both of those suggestions are just ludicrous. Sure, Tengu needs a nerf (unforuntately), but the other three are already pretty weak so why bother?
Tengu is fine, that 70 km hamgu suffers a huge loss of tank for PvP or a huge loss of tank for PvE
Even then, with the heavy missile nerf, 100mn 5 launchers arent exactly scary. |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
973
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 17:52:00 -
[87] - Quote
Derath Ellecon wrote:By the way, still waiting to see a fit that can do everything you claim back on page 4. You mean you can't figure out a fit with EFT? It's not difficult.
[Tengu, New Setup 1] Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System
10MN Afterburner II Pithi C-Type Small Shield Booster Shield Boost Amplifier II [empty med slot] [empty med slot] [empty med slot]
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile
Medium Rocket Fuel Cache Partition II Medium Hydraulic Bay Thrusters II Medium Rocket Fuel Cache Partition I
Tengu Defensive - Amplification Node Tengu Electronics - Dissolution Sequencer Tengu Engineering - Augmented Capacitor Reservoir Tengu Offensive - Accelerated Ejection Bay Tengu Propulsion - Fuel Catalyst
There you go, use whatever hardeners you like.
Oh god. |

Goldensaver
ArTech Expeditions
181
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 17:55:00 -
[88] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Goldensaver wrote:Also, 5 sub skills to V takes 20-25 days. For example, getting logi, HAC's, and Recon to V takes bloody forever in comparison 25 days for Recon 5 - I can't point with my proteus at 109km like with my lach with boosts , jam with my tengu like with my falcon, Web with loki like I can do with huggin or neut with legion like I can do with curse 25days for Logi 5 -tell me when was the last time you saw a T3 gang with T3 logistics and please screen it, I'd like to have a nice laugh. Both being exponentially overpowered over T3's doing or capable to do same stuff. DPS T3's? -wtf is the issue?? HACs are total complete and utter crap except Zealot, that's not T3's fault. Goldensaver wrote:But by getting all subs to V (assuming they only buff the bad subs, and not nerf any) you'll get a ship that does all of that, AND BETTER for only 20-25 days I just proved to you they don't, you're displacing the real problem, being Command ships worst than they should be and HACs total kitty shite. You should train for all 4 of them, use them as you seem to be experienced with logis and recons then come again tell us your experience, you'd change your opinion for sure. The only way to get your T3 really badass is with your toon fully TOP 5 skills trained, pirate implants in his head, strong combat boosters (25M+piece) and another T3 pilot with links/implants and probably named implants worth billions+faction fits. Then add tons of pimpy faction/officer stuff on your combat T3 and yes, you get a good ship. That's exactly what you can expect for this ship after that much effort (about the cost of a super hull just for 2 skilled implants/fitted toons) Flash news, not everyone flies those that way and the chances you ever get one or a gang of these is in low sec and calm null sec entries but you can be sure they gtfo asap as soon as they start seeing numbers climb, they only attack the week unlike some very known players.
I'd like it to be noted that since I made that post, I've really changed my opinion on these things.
Maybe a couple subs might be too strong. I haven't experimented with them all, but a couple might be a bit over the top.
A LOT of subs are downright trash, and rarely if ever get used. Those could use some fixing.
I stand by my belief that it's too easy to train into T3's. Most of the prerequisites on the Subsystem skills are skills you should have trained up anyways, and don't take too long to train up regardless. I don't think this should be done by increasing the rank of subsystem skills though, but by adding some more prerequisites. Perhaps even some subsystem specific prerequisites (ie. All warfare skills to 5 for the warfare processors, HAM skills trained up for the Legion Assault sub, etc. Skills you'll be getting anyways to use the subs, but requiring some side training to use them rather than just a couple blanket prereqs)
I think we can all agree the command subs are broken in relation to Command ships. How they choose to resolve this is up to them, be it nerfing T3's, or buffing CS's. I really don't care, and perhaps allow T3's to fit a bit of tank in a "command ship" configuration. Maybe not for now, but for when they've changed up OGB mechanics. |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
1412
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 18:15:00 -
[89] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Derath Ellecon wrote:By the way, still waiting to see a fit that can do everything you claim back on page 4. You mean you can't figure out a fit with EFT? It's not difficult. [Tengu, New Setup 1] Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System 10MN Afterburner II Pithi C-Type Small Shield Booster Shield Boost Amplifier II [empty med slot] [empty med slot] [empty med slot] Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Medium Rocket Fuel Cache Partition II Medium Hydraulic Bay Thrusters II Medium Rocket Fuel Cache Partition I Tengu Defensive - Amplification Node Tengu Electronics - Dissolution Sequencer Tengu Engineering - Augmented Capacitor Reservoir Tengu Offensive - Accelerated Ejection Bay Tengu Propulsion - Fuel Catalyst There you go, use whatever hardeners you like.
You seemed to get most of it. I hardly consider that a "battleship sized tank" (even considering its mobility)and at only 633m/s it would get caught and DIAF in any sort of PVP environment.
Maybe its an nice fit for PVE, but honestly does anyone really care about which ships are best for PVE? In PVP anything close to that fit that would be a nice Tengu killmail for someone. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Fatal Ascension
258
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 18:24:00 -
[90] - Quote
Derath Ellecon wrote:Riot Girl wrote:Derath Ellecon wrote:By the way, still waiting to see a fit that can do everything you claim back on page 4. You mean you can't figure out a fit with EFT? It's not difficult. [Tengu, New Setup 1] Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System 10MN Afterburner II Pithi C-Type Small Shield Booster Shield Boost Amplifier II [empty med slot] [empty med slot] [empty med slot] Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Medium Rocket Fuel Cache Partition II Medium Hydraulic Bay Thrusters II Medium Rocket Fuel Cache Partition I Tengu Defensive - Amplification Node Tengu Electronics - Dissolution Sequencer Tengu Engineering - Augmented Capacitor Reservoir Tengu Offensive - Accelerated Ejection Bay Tengu Propulsion - Fuel Catalyst There you go, use whatever hardeners you like. You seemed to get most of it. I hardly consider that a "battleship sized tank" (even considering its mobility)and at only 633m/s it would get caught and DIAF in any sort of PVP environment. Maybe its an nice fit for PVE, but honestly does anyone really care about which ships are best for PVE? In PVP anything close to that fit that would be a nice Tengu killmail for someone.
One med neut, and that thing is done, plus the tank has to be dead space or you are running into cpu issues
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |