| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Untanas Volmyr
Running with Knives Nexus Fleet
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 19:02:00 -
[31] - Quote
AbhChallenger wrote:Untanas Volmyr wrote:When the time comes. All they have to do is make dx11 an optional executable. Everyone's happy. Tesselation in space would be a site to see. That works in World of Warcraft. NOT in EVE. Supporting two graphics pipelines requires more staff. As otherwise you end up spending valuable dev time trying to figure out why some feature works in DX9 but not DX11 or vise versa. Such issues can affect the sandbox. Not everything in gaming can be a checkbox. WoW gets away with it because that game brings in brazillions of dollars.
What's a world of Warcraft? It worked in Age of Conan. And a few other titles if you bother to check directories. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4900
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 19:21:00 -
[32] - Quote
When it's a choice between having what are already pretty good graphics and making the game unplayable for a large number of people (and not necessarily just those people running XP) then the answer is quite obviously "no you aren't getting your tesselation, now get over it." |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4900
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 19:26:00 -
[33] - Quote
People are forgetting that it's not enough to just have an OS that supports DX 11. Your graphics card has to support it as well. Many, many EVE players have graphics cards that don't support DX 11. I don't. Don't ******* force me to buy another computer (can't change graphics card on this computer) just so I can keep playing EVE. |

AbhChallenger
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 19:33:00 -
[34] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:When it's a choice between having what are already pretty good graphics and making the game unplayable for a large number of people (and not necessarily just those people running XP) then the answer is quite obviously "no you aren't getting your tesselation, now get over it."
Except it is pretty much Windows XP holding it back at this point. Onboard graphics have had DX11 support for some time and the low, mid, and high end is saturated with DX11 hardware.
So the question is how many of those "large amount of people" will quit EVE instead of upgrading? And what graphical features and efficiencies will convince a majority of those to stay?
And then the question becomes. At what point where new players who are drawn in by EVE joining the DX11 party outnumber those who think hardware not designed for anything more than facebook and Youtube from close to a decade ago must be supported forever?
If I had to decide.
#1 It is a simple switch to DX11 merely for the efficiency and ease of code then no. Now is not the time. #2 If it is a proper Switch to DX11 with a large amount of Game assets getting DX11 features that will make other games blush with envy then I say yes now is the time to leave DX9. |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
11265
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 19:53:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ager Agemo wrote:personally I find it sort of ridiculous that we are still being dragged down by XP, I admit it was one of the best OS ever made, but now a days windows 7 works just as good if not way better, and a DX11 card is worth what? 50$. last I hear only 5% of the people is sticking to XP on eve.
maybe CCP could risk sacrifying those and in return become more modern and get a new influx of players that have been put off due to performance and shiny issues, lets admit it... EVE runs on a DX engine that is stone age old by now...
I agree, I spend lots of monies keeping my PC up to date. Why must I be suffer because James over there won't leave the refrigerator box he's opted to live in?  "Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á |

Stan'din
Incursion Squad Punkz 'n Monkeys
115
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 20:03:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Adela Talvanen wrote:I recall during the FF recorded coverage that in the Animation Q&A one of the devs mentioned somethig along he lines that the next expansion will be having DX 11 features.
I might have miss heard, or CCP is finally moving from DX 9 graphics. That doesn't sound right, as our Win XP users would have issues.
**** windows Xp users Your about as much use as a condom dispenser in the Vatican. |

AbhChallenger
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 20:07:00 -
[37] - Quote
CCP has already shown they are fully willing to abandon older hardware. Even on extremely short notice.
I note two times in particular. The first when they implemented software PhysX for clothing and hair into EVE. If I remember correctly bad luck had it that Nvidia made a change that made a wide away of older but previously useable CPUs unable to run EVE. I think people had less of a month warning on that one.
Then the change in shader model that left first generation atom onboard graphics unable to run EVE. That was quite controversial if I remember but there was more warning beforehand.
Point is EVE is still a 3D game and not Microsoft Office. At a certain point it becomes the better decision to say no to older hardware and software.
When you purchase a laptop or all in one PC or anything that limits your ability to upgrade you run the risk of the complete system becoming utterly obsolete and the year for DX9 or DX10 is 2014. As once XP is out of the support picture the floodgates of DX11 will open. |

Untanas Volmyr
Running with Knives Nexus Fleet
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 20:13:00 -
[38] - Quote
Dx9 has come a long way. So I wouldn't be to worried about what you are missing when it comes to the big switch anyway. Regardless of dx version. OpenGL upgrades seem to be adaptable between dx versions. I haven't checked that info for a while. Ambient occlusion was also not a dx9 feature for a while. Double check that info my phone is slow. |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
630
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 20:19:00 -
[39] - Quote
AbhChallenger wrote:Windows XP WAS an amazing OS. Well ahead of it's time and it's stability was what propelled entire industries forward. However recently it is doing little more than slowing everything down. The issue is more to do with the fact that for hardware such as sound and graphics XP and modern windows systems are completely different. Forcing drivers to be written for those who simply refuse to upgrade. When XP support is fully dropped next year it will mean that there will only ONE overall driver system that has to be supported and that ought to do a great deal to improve PC gaming. For DX11 it get's complicated. WoW has had a DX11 rendering system for years now. Simply because it is faster. For EVE however an issue caused by supporting two graphics systems can affect the sandbox for a time. An example can be looked at as the update that caused first generation Intel Atom based netbooks to be unable to open EVE. At first it did not seem like much but many were using the inexpensive hardware to do EVE activities at work. The point I am trying to say is that when the time for DX11 comes.. It needs to be a complete switch in my opinion. And the timing of such is crucial. People are going to have to buy new laptops (desktops can be upgraded with a 20-40 USD card for DX11 these days) And doing it to speed things up like WoW will not convince them of the worth. it has to involve massive visual improvements in my opinion. Trendon Evenstar wrote:Stop adding things that make large fleet fights lag thanks Please educate yourself about the difference between Direct X 9 and Direct X 11.
Funny you should mention WoW repeatedly. I'm not sure if you did it because there is a stigma about that gam on these forums, or if you did it because WoW used to have worse graphics than Eve, but now blows it out of the water in the grafix department.
IMHO the real thing that holds eve back is the amount of multiboxing people do. Its much harder to run multiple clients of a GPU hog.
I was just going over my system usage as I played the other day thinking to my self, wow, they've come a long way since 100% usage of CPU and GPU directly after CQ was released. Hats off to the devs, seriously.
From: Tommas De'Wins To: Cipher Jones Dude :) I got massives Basi hahahahahahaha |

Ken 1138
AGNT Inc.
40
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 20:21:00 -
[40] - Quote
I'm curious about this too. Could we get a Dev answer? |

AbhChallenger
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 20:29:00 -
[41] - Quote
DX11 is more efficient than DX9 so I personally don't think it is about multiple clients. |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
631
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 20:42:00 -
[42] - Quote
AbhChallenger wrote:DX11 is more efficient than DX9 so I personally don't think it is about multiple clients.
What uses more power, a car that is 50% efficient and produces 200 HP or a car that is 90% efficient and produces 500HP?
From: Tommas De'Wins To: Cipher Jones Dude :) I got massives Basi hahahahahahaha |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
731
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 20:45:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Montevius Williams wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Adela Talvanen wrote:I recall during the FF recorded coverage that in the Animation Q&A one of the devs mentioned somethig along he lines that the next expansion will be having DX 11 features.
I might have miss heard, or CCP is finally moving from DX 9 graphics. That doesn't sound right, as our Win XP users would have issues. Nothing says lack of progress like running antiquated systems. Seriously, if EVE cant feature state of the art assets becasue of Windows XP - wow I cant believe people still run XP. I mean, damn, didnt Windows stop supporting XP like 5 years ago? I ould be wrong, but If they are still supporting it, that cant be doing so for long. People latched onto XP as a finally stable version of Windows like it was a life preserver in a sea of stormy OS's. It's easy to overlook how buggy and more importantly how insecure it is when it runs halfway decently. Note: I haven't run XP for a loooong time. Too many programs I use won't run on it as it is so out of date.
Ho yes please explain me how much secure how much stable and how much performing XP is over Win8, yeah, me would like to have a good laugh.
Xp was an awesome OS just like you said in a time where most OS's were bullcrap but now I think I can safely say Win8 is just a pure little beast when you put some effort to adapt or just use a 3rd party little addon that makes if just awesome.
If you only play with your PC, use some light exell stuff, agenda etc you know, small stuff, yeah Xp is still ok, my smartphone does it too and I can even play HD films/vids on it... Try to run some professional software with heavy calculations (architecture or engineering) on XP and the same on Win8 to see the difference, it's really amazing how perceptible this difference is.
*removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4900
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 20:52:00 -
[44] - Quote
AbhChallenger wrote:Nvidia had DX11 hardware in 2010 AMD had DX11 hardware in 2009
It is now May 2013. It is likely to be next year before CCP would even announce a switch to DX11. (A good time with XP finally being dropped by Microsoft) So what? |

Djana Libra
The Black Ops S2N Citizens
164
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:09:00 -
[45] - Quote
I remember an eve classic and modern client. Didn't last long tho.
But yeah i wouldnt mind seeing dx11 if they put it to good use. |

Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere
411
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:09:00 -
[46] - Quote
EvE has a ton of oldschool players. Unfortunately, they are unwilling and/or unable to upgrade from XP. I think the saying "you can't teach a old dog new tricks" definately applies. Even though the differences between XP and windows 7 are virtually non-existant. I wouldn't recomend windows 8, as the difference would likely blow their minds. They don't even release service packs for XP anymore, its so outdated. They're literally leaving their systems vunerable to modern advancements, all because of their attachment to what they are used to.
Seriously, XP people, upgrade your rigs. You're holding all of EvE back from sweet modern graphics. We don't want to have to wait for you to all die off before it happens!  Post with your main, like a BOSS! |

AbhChallenger
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:18:00 -
[47] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:AbhChallenger wrote:Nvidia had DX11 hardware in 2010 AMD had DX11 hardware in 2009
It is now May 2013. It is likely to be next year before CCP would even announce a switch to DX11. (A good time with XP finally being dropped by Microsoft) So what?
You have had plenty (and will have even more) to upgrade into a DX11 system.
Cheapest AMD DX11 Card I see on Newegg is 30 USD For Nvidia it is 39 USD
You are saying CCP should not update to a standard which had hardware in 2009, has many benefits over dx9, will bring in new players, etc.. because you or whoever purchased your current computer failed to realize or did not care that a notebook, nettop or all in one PC is unable to be upgraded?
CCP made the call for a great deal less benefit in the past. I personally just don't see them accepting your situation for holding back development into a DX11 client. Especially after 2014 and XP support dropped. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4900
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:23:00 -
[48] - Quote
I'm saying that a lot of people are unable to upgrade, and you wanting your shinies isn't enough justification to force people to spend money they may not have. |

AbhChallenger
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:23:00 -
[49] - Quote
Xen Solarus wrote:EvE has a ton of oldschool players. Unfortunately, they are unwilling and/or unable to upgrade from XP. I think the saying "you can't teach a old dog new tricks" definately applies. Even though the differences between XP and windows 7 are virtually non-existant. I wouldn't recomend windows 8, as the difference would likely blow their minds. They don't even release service packs for XP anymore, its so outdated. They're literally leaving their systems vunerable to modern advancements, all because of their attachment to what they are used to. Seriously, XP people, upgrade your rigs. You're holding all of EvE back from sweet modern graphics. We don't want to have to wait for you to all die off before it happens! 
People need to get away from XP as soon as possible as even with security updates it is an extremely insecure OS compared to later Windows operating systems.
Don't forget the hardware requirement for DX11 as well. However, hardware is even less of an excuse in my opinion with the above prices and modern onboard graphics support. |

Setaceous
Nexus Prima
69
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:27:00 -
[50] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:I'm saying that a lot of people are unable to upgrade, and you wanting your shinies isn't enough justification to force people to spend money they may not have or simply stop playing. Indeed. Though if money for those people is seriously that tight, maybe they should reconsider their budget and stop playing anyway. MMOs subs should always come last in a budget for a responsible person. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4900
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:29:00 -
[51] - Quote
Setaceous wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I'm saying that a lot of people are unable to upgrade, and you wanting your shinies isn't enough justification to force people to spend money they may not have or simply stop playing. Indeed. Though if money for those people is seriously that tight, maybe they should reconsider their budget and stop playing anyway. MMOs subs should always come last in a budget for a responsible person. It's not in my budget at all. |

AbhChallenger
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:33:00 -
[52] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:I'm saying that a lot of people are unable to upgrade, and you wanting your shinies isn't enough justification to force people to spend money they may not have.
If that was the case EVE would have never evolved from the classic client. And please do not attempt to convince me that EVE would have the same subscriber count.
They have updated the requirements for far less benefit in the past. Pretty much took first generation netbooks out of EVE with the shader change. I doubt this will be the biggest change they have done after 2014. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4900
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:38:00 -
[53] - Quote
So you're fine with forcing a lot of people to pay several hundred dollars (at least) just to continue playing? But it's okay, right? Cause it's not like you have to do anything to get all the shinies you want.
I seriously doubt CCP feels the same way. You can either get a job with CCP to help them develop an optional DX 11 client, or you could shut up and wait for them to do so, or you can just shut up. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14072
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:44:00 -
[54] - Quote
GǪat the end of the day, there's simply not much of a reason for them to go for DX11 at this stage.
Sure, they will work on it internally, but rushing it out before DX9 dips below, say, 5% of he install-base is just pointless. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.-á |

Inna Cristiana
Short Bus Hauling Corp. Black Beard's Horde
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:44:00 -
[55] - Quote
Do the following things, CCP:
1) Switch certain game graphics assets to DX11 (Shaders, Tesselation)
and
2) Release the High Resolution Texture pack
I guarantee it will bring many more players to the game. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4900
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:46:00 -
[56] - Quote
Inna Cristiana wrote:Do the following things, CCP:
1) Switch certain game graphics assets to DX11 (Shaders, Tesselation)
and
2) Release the High Resolution Texture pack
I guarantee it will bring many more players to the game. I guarantee forcing both of these changes will force many players away from the game. If they're introduced now they need to be optional. |

AbhChallenger
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:47:00 -
[57] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪat the end of the day, there's simply not much of a reason for them to go for DX11 at this stage.
Sure, they will work on it internally, but rushing it out before DX9 dips below, say, 5% of he install-base is just pointless.
I agree that unless they are willing to all in to make full use of DX11. It is not worth it.
DX9 use is not a metric tho in my opinion. DX9 Is due to XP and XP is out in 2014. |

AbhChallenger
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:50:00 -
[58] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Inna Cristiana wrote:Do the following things, CCP:
1) Switch certain game graphics assets to DX11 (Shaders, Tesselation)
and
2) Release the High Resolution Texture pack
I guarantee it will bring many more players to the game. I guarantee forcing both of these changes will force many players away from the game. If they're introduced now they need to be optional.
Heard the same thing when they ended Gen 1 Intel Atom's ability to log into EVE. In the end I would suggest never purchasing an all-in-one or notebook expecting EVE to remain able to be used with it for an extended period of time. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4900
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:52:00 -
[59] - Quote
Yeah, I'm sure the number of people who were using Gen 1 Atoms comes anywhere close to the number of people running DX11 incompatible hardware. Get real. |

Inna Cristiana
Short Bus Hauling Corp. Black Beard's Horde
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 21:54:00 -
[60] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Inna Cristiana wrote:Do the following things, CCP:
1) Switch certain game graphics assets to DX11 (Shaders, Tesselation)
and
2) Release the High Resolution Texture pack
I guarantee it will bring many more players to the game. I guarantee forcing both of these changes will force many players away from the game. If they're introduced now they need to be optional.
Of course it's optional, i have never ever heard of a video game that only gives "very high" graphics quality as choice...
There will always be "Low" for the welfares. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |