| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Just Lilly
69
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 07:55:00 -
[91] - Quote
DX11 would be nice, but the technology is getting old, better prepare for the future and start thinking DX12  Powered by Nvidia GTX 690 |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
631
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 08:02:00 -
[92] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:There are many many people who will never again buy a dx9 game. GǪand the many people who will judge a game on its DirectX version rather than on its gameplay won't stick around for the long haul of EVE anyway. Quote:They will have to upgrade again, its just how the industry works. GǪwhich is why it's so common. Oh wait, it's not. You upgrade if it provides an advantage; DX11 offers some performance, but only two visual enhancements (that aren't even required in DX11 hardware) in the form of SM5 and tesselation. The former is a stronger reason than the latter, but it's the latter (rather unspectacular) part that everyone assumes will be a selling point. Stan'din wrote:Eve has the potential to be absolutely breathtaking, but you oxygen thieves need to either nut up or shut up. and catch the rest of us up in 2013 not 2003. It already is, and moving to DX11 wouldn't change it much. That's the whole problem: the visual benefits aren't really there, and especially aren't big enough to justify alienating a still-sizeable chunk of the player base.
Glad the devs disagree 100% and already have DX11 working.
What surviving DX8 games are there and what is their subscriber base looking like? I can't think of a single one, but I am sure you can, and describe many merits of it, of course other than income. From: Tommas De'Wins To: Cipher Jones Dude :) I got massives Basi hahahahahahaha |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
997
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 08:02:00 -
[93] - Quote
Ryal Acami wrote:XP is still supported by Microshaft till April 2014. So no more security updates after that time. People will have to bite the bullet and upgrade after that or suffer an ever increasingly insecure platform
The SM3 requirment pushed me out of EvE for 6 months I think a further grapics requiement would push me out longer  An' then [email protected], he come scramblin outta theTerminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system'scrashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children' |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4039
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 08:08:00 -
[94] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Adela Talvanen wrote:I recall during the FF recorded coverage that in the Animation Q&A one of the devs mentioned somethig along he lines that the next expansion will be having DX 11 features.
I might have miss heard, or CCP is finally moving from DX 9 graphics. That doesn't sound right, as our Win XP users would have issues. Nothing says lack of progress like running antiquated systems. Seriously, if EVE cant feature state of the art assets becasue of Windows XP - wow I cant believe people still run XP. I mean, damn, didnt Windows stop supporting XP like 5 years ago? I ould be wrong, but If they are still supporting it, that cant be doing so for long.
Just yesterday I have read that as of now Win XP accounts for 30% of the Windows installations worldwide.
Doubt CCP would do without those subs, even if the EvE player base was above average and only had say 15% Win XP installations left. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
631
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 08:12:00 -
[95] - Quote
DP sorry From: Tommas De'Wins To: Cipher Jones Dude :) I got massives Basi hahahahahahaha |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
631
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 08:14:00 -
[96] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:[quote=Ryal Acami]XP is still supported by Microshaft till April 2014. So no more security updates after that time. People will have to bite the bullet and upgrade after that or suffer an ever increasingly insecure platform The SM3 requirment pushed me out of EvE for 6 months I think a further grapics requiement would push me out longer 
You found a card that does sm3 but not dx11?
Amazing.
Quote:Just yesterday I have read that as of now Win XP accounts for 30% of the Windows installations worldwide.
Would love to see that source, and wonder if it includes the hundreds of millions of pirated copies in Asia. Yes I'm serious, thanks in advance. From: Tommas De'Wins To: Cipher Jones Dude :) I got massives Basi hahahahahahaha |

Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
124
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 08:34:00 -
[97] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:AbhChallenger wrote:DX11 is more efficient than DX9 so I personally don't think it is about multiple clients. What uses more power, a car that is 50% efficient and produces 200 HP or a car that is 90% efficient and produces 500HP?
First, bad example, never do that again, thank You.
Second, cars don't have Hit Points. There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper. |

Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
124
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 08:38:00 -
[98] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:I'm saying that a lot of people are unable to upgrade, and you wanting your shinies isn't enough justification to force people to spend money they may not have or simply stop playing.
It was a vali reason in the past, why shouldn't it be a valid reason now? There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper. |

Akali Kuvakei
Eclipse Navy. Test Alliance Please Ignore
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 08:47:00 -
[99] - Quote
Remember. Light client? It was awesome to have that option.
At this stage the should have a option every time you log in to play in dx9. Or dx11. Let it be our choice and not forced upon us.
Yes CCP will have to do a little extra work. But you know what. THAT IS THIER JOB. |

Tiven loves Tansien
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
805
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 08:47:00 -
[100] - Quote
AbhChallenger wrote:(desktops can be upgraded with a 20-40 USD card for DX11 these days)
Can you contract me 2 plexes so i can upgrade. |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2510
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 09:12:00 -
[101] - Quote
Tiven loves Tansien wrote:AbhChallenger wrote:(desktops can be upgraded with a 20-40 USD card for DX11 these days) Can you contract me 2 plexes so i can upgrade.
Sure. But I'm going to need a 4bil 'saftey' deposit so I know you aren't scamming. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14096
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 09:46:00 -
[102] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Glad the devs disagree 100% and already have DX11 working. If they disagreed 100%, it would already be out. Instead, they only started working on it last year; they are still holding back with no sign of it coming any time soon; and like with every other graphical jump in requirements, they're talking about how those left behind have to be a sufficiently small group to make it an insignificant loss.
So we're still back at that question: are the advantages worth the cost? The visual enhancement offered is pretty small, no matter how much people dream of some hypothetical massive change. The performance improvement can be decent (especially with the kind of scenes EVE produces), but that's not what the GÇ£must have DX11GÇ¥-crowd is looking for GÇö potential new customers in particular. So will it bring in more people even though it looks the same, and will this hopefully-an-increase outweigh the lost accounts it will inevitably generate?
Quote:What surviving DX8 games are there and what is their subscriber base looking like? GǪand this is in reference to what, exactly? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.-á |

AbhChallenger
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:44:00 -
[103] - Quote
I apologize but no I will not be contracting any PLEX for people to upgrade. Especially as in my opinion there is no chance for there to be a mandatory update to DX11 for well over a year.
I disagree about saying the visual enhancement would be small. It would be bigger than any jump they have made in the past in my opinion. And that it because I doubt CCP would make DX10 hardware (There are still many people using decently powerful 4870s and GTX 2x series) unable to use EVE unless it was very easy to show that investing in new hardware is worth the funds.
That is why I suggest that everyone think about what they need to do IF it is announced. As once CCP starts showing what their DX11 can do (And not just asteroids bouncing off shields) something tells me the community will have little sympathy for those trying to ask CCP not to do it because they are still running Windows XP. Or DX9 hardware or etc... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14100
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:47:00 -
[104] - Quote
AbhChallenger wrote:I disagree about saying the visual enhancement would be small. Ok. What visual enhancement are you envisioning that will make a significant impact and which can't be done under DX9? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.-á |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4902
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 10:50:00 -
[105] - Quote
Technology demonstrations based on computing power that almost nobody has doesn't translate to a compelling reason to force a change on everyone. |

Dyniss
Timeless Abyss Productions Apocalypse Now.
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 11:00:00 -
[106] - Quote
I don't see why people let their computers fall so far behind. Do you really like to log in and play a game that looks like a Nintendo game from 1989? And don't tell me that bullcrap that you can't shell out the money for upgrades. What are you living on government support or something? If you can't afford 30-50 bucks on a card I feel bad for you when it comes time to sit down at the table to eat. But I agree with the one case however. CCP should not switch until it is feasible to do so. There is no need to race to DX11 when most games nowadays are still burning off DX9 (Consoles are still churning on this so why race EVE to DX11?) I say let CCP work on the game in DX9 some more seeing as A LOT still needs to be done in the graphical department. And I mean A LOT! There is so much out of scale and just so blurry looking I see no need to move up to a new DX version until they finish what still pretty much outdated with the current. |

AbhChallenger
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 11:04:00 -
[107] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Technology demonstrations based on computing power that almost nobody has doesn't translate to a compelling reason to force a change on everyone.
I doubt CCP would ask people to use DX11 hardware for asteroids bouncing off shields. They would show test clients running partial conversions to DX11 in my opinion. Yet that is not likely to happen until XP is no longer required to be supported (Once the security updates for it stop)
Big, lots of work, I just don't think CCP is going to do WoW style DX11 rendering of DX9 effects for performance only. I just think you have to fear your computer becoming obsolete for nothing. |

Octoven
Phoenix Productions Headshot Gaming
112
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 11:15:00 -
[108] - Quote
Stan'din wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Stan'din wrote:and you are the reason the rest of us who have invested time and money building or buying our rigs so we can play games on constant 60fps with beautiful visuals have to suffer below par standards. I didn't force you to invest your time and money. That was your choice. If you knew the state of graphics in EVE and upgraded your rig past what was necessary to run it anyway, and are now demanding that CCP improve the graphics to justify your purchase, then you're an absolute moron. Not to Justify my purchase, to Justify everyone's purchase. and CCP need to improve graphics to a quality that is expected of a modern game today. but they can't, i am sure they want to, but people running outdated rigs are holding a lot of us back. for example a GTX 560ti can now be bought for less than -ú100 ($158) Add 8gb of ram -ú23 ( $35 dollars ) coupled with a semi decent processor you have something capable of running eve on high end at 60fps. you can't use the argument that its too expensive because it clearly is not.
I see you clearly are NOT on a tight budget |

AbhChallenger
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 11:26:00 -
[109] - Quote
Being on a tight budget used to mean a great deal more for PC gaming. However for the past half decade it was easy to remain with DX9 hardware because of the disaster that was the Windows Vista launch.
Yet DX9 is a brick wall and eventually supporting people with older hardware on a tight budget means spending funds to get DX9 to do something that is clearly more efficient and easier to develop for in DX11. For CCP I would suggest 2014 being the right year to do it with XP finally going out of the picture.
Basically there is no doubt in my mind that hardware requirements in 2014 and 2015 will rise at a far quicker rate than in the past 5. |

Qual
Cornexant Research Sleeping Dragons
23
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 11:40:00 -
[110] - Quote
CCP will drop DX9 when:
a) They think it will make sense for THEM to use it.
b) More than 95% of eve sessions run on hardware capable of DX11. (Yes, the do stats on that when you start the client...) |

Lost True
Paradise project
2176
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 12:05:00 -
[111] - Quote
My 3-4 year old notebook only support DX10.
But one of the things i like about EVE is up-to-date graphics, so i'll be glad if i'll need to buy a new one to make eve more beatiful. in 2007 i've thought it's a sci-fi simulator, not an "e-sports" game. I'm not a teenager, how would i like it much? [-á-¦-¦-Ç-â-é-+-+-¦] -£-¦-¦-+-+-+-¦ -¦-+-Ç-+-+-Ç-¦-å-+-Å Transtellar |

Zuzmaw
33 RD Li3 Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 12:20:00 -
[112] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:AbhChallenger wrote:Nvidia had DX11 hardware in 2010 AMD had DX11 hardware in 2009
It is now May 2013. It is likely to be next year before CCP would even announce a switch to DX11. (A good time with XP finally being dropped by Microsoft) So what? So upgrade?
It's not that difficult, welcome to the world of PC gaming, where you HAVE to upgrade every once in awhile. A GTX 560Ti, a kickass card for what it is, is $170 on Newegg. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4040
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 13:31:00 -
[113] - Quote
Dyniss wrote:I don't see why people let their computers fall so far behind. Do you really enjoy logging into a game that looks like a Nintendo game from 1989? And don't tell me that bullcrap that you can't shell out the money for upgrades. What are you living on government support or something?
I have 2 pretty decent & recent and expensive laptops (ASUS, nVidia on board card, 8GB RAM, Windows 7) yet they don't support SM5.
Shall I trash those in the name of some shiny particle?
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4904
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 13:46:00 -
[114] - Quote
Zuzmaw wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:AbhChallenger wrote:Nvidia had DX11 hardware in 2010 AMD had DX11 hardware in 2009
It is now May 2013. It is likely to be next year before CCP would even announce a switch to DX11. (A good time with XP finally being dropped by Microsoft) So what? So upgrade? It's not that difficult, welcome to the world of PC gaming, where you HAVE to upgrade every once in awhile. A GTX 560Ti, a kickass card for what it is, is $170 on Newegg. And what am I supposed to do with this graphics card? You seem to think I have a place to put it. |

Ager Agemo
Kiith Paktu Curatores Veritatis Alliance
293
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 13:46:00 -
[115] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Lors Dornick wrote:CCP has exact figures on how many of their subscribers that are running which OS.
No amount of shouting in either direction is going to change those figures.
How many times does it need to be said that the OS isn't the only restriction? I'm running Windows 7. Still can't do DX11. ... running windows 7 requires DX11 support..., at the very least 10.1... othertwise means you are running windows 7 without any driver for your GPU. |

Ager Agemo
Kiith Paktu Curatores Veritatis Alliance
293
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 13:49:00 -
[116] - Quote
Tippia wrote:AbhChallenger wrote:I disagree about saying the visual enhancement would be small. Ok. What visual enhancement are you envisioning that will make a significant impact and which can't be done under DX9?
less client lag? more performance even with the same graphics? a better framework for multithreading? and all that base to work with when creating future shinies? I believe those are way more than enough arguments to switch. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4904
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 14:00:00 -
[117] - Quote
Ager Agemo wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Lors Dornick wrote:CCP has exact figures on how many of their subscribers that are running which OS.
No amount of shouting in either direction is going to change those figures.
How many times does it need to be said that the OS isn't the only restriction? I'm running Windows 7. Still can't do DX11. ... running windows 7 requires DX11 support..., at the very least 10.1... othertwise means you are running windows 7 without any driver for your GPU. Well it took some digging to figure this out.
My card supports DX10.1. I have DX11 installed on my machine but the card isn't capable of using DX11 features. As long as CCP allows us to play the game with DX10 support I see no problem. And there's absolutely no reason for EVE not to at least continue support for DX10, since apparently the difference between DX11 and DX10 is significantly less than the difference between DX10 and DX9.
Besides, there is only one game currently out the requires exclusively DX11, and that's Crysis 3. There's also only one upcoming game, Battlefield 4, that requires DX11. All other games have at least DX10 support, and many of them have DX9 support. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14108
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 14:01:00 -
[118] - Quote
Ager Agemo wrote:less client lag? more performance even with the same graphics? a better framework for multithreading? and all that base to work with when creating future shinies? I believe those are way more than enough arguments to switch. Sure, but those aren't enhanced visuals. My point is that the whole GÇ£omgz, must upgrades or it will be ugly/people will leaveGÇ¥ argument rests on the assumption that going for DX11 will somehow automatically make things look better. It won't.
My other point is that, if people pick up the game simply because it says DX11 on the box, and would have refused to do so if it still said DX9, then they won't last long anyway. Between the Excel online gameplay and the need to zoom out to view the battlefield, it's the gameplay GÇö not the graphics GÇö that will capture and retain customers.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.-á |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4904
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 14:19:00 -
[119] - Quote
EVE is an MMO. Graphics are nice, but not to the exclusion of established players who may be unwilling or unable to upgrade their machines just to keep playing. Ultimately what's more important is the gameplay.
Maybe if this were WoW where there are separate servers and each expansion is an optional paid expansion you could get away with it, but forcing a substantial number of players to upgrade or buy new computers just to keep playing the same game simply won't work.
CCP should either take the time to develop a proper implementation with backwards compatibility to DX10 at the very least, or they should wait until such time as the number of players with incompatible machines drops below a threshold at which time they should announce the port several months in advance and then make the switch. |

Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere
412
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 14:22:00 -
[120] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:So you're fine with forcing a lot of people to pay several hundred dollars (at least) just to continue playing? But it's okay, right? Cause it's not like you have to do anything to get all the shinies you want.
They don't have to spend anything. They just need to update their windows verson to a modern one of their choice. They can stick with DX9 if they like, or if their systems can't handle modern graphics. At least that way, everyone else can have the choice to run on the higher graphics, rather than being held back by people living in the stoneage. Post with your main, like a BOSS! |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |