Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Fatal Ascension
412
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 18:29:00 -
[121] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Harry Forever wrote:Templar Knightsbane wrote:Harry Forever wrote:
what if an old lady is that L4 mission runner?
She just got ganked... you know why I choose the goons as my primary target? ask yourself why you people choose highsec miners... I choose highsec miners because the quality and quantity of their tears is superior. Basically, it's funnier to pick on them than almost anyone else. This is because of their entitled mindset; they think they are entitled to complete safety in highsec (which of course they aren't) and as such they raise a much bigger fuss than other people. Which in turn increases my amusement. The entitled mind set is only that of your own perception. To say every miner or Indy has this is more than a little presumptuous on your part. I do these so I can continue to pvp. This diversity prevents me from being crippled should they make changes ohhh like to letGÇÖs say running data and relic sites. Those people that used this path to make isk are now scrambling to find another way to fund their play style.
I dunno what you are talking about, I bank running data and relic sites.
.....oh yeah, I have like 4-5 null sec regions to roam through looking for sites. |
E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
246
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 18:35:00 -
[122] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote:The entitled mind set is only that of your own perception.
Oh, so the guy who was screaming "It's HIGH sec!!!!" at me yesterday after I managed to take his pod as well, that was just my own perception? It's very real. An attempt to deny the entitlement mindset of so many highsec denizens is merely attempted defense of an indefensible group of people. Quote:I do these so I can continue to pvp. Sure you do, bro. Quote:This diversity prevents me from being crippled should they make changes ohhh like to letGÇÖs say running data and relic sites.
Those people that used this path to make isk are now scrambling to find another way to fund their play style.
What diversity? It's mining. Just that, no diversity, you are just a miner. And, the rest of us will continue to make money exploring like we always did, and the scrubs will still be the scrubs.
Yes because one person does it so that has to mean every miner and Indy does right? ugghh common sense.
Diversity, yes look it up if you need to. For me it means I mine and indy one account while ALSO ratting and relics and trading on my other dedicated pvp account.
A lot of companies do this diversity thing in real life to allow them to weather economic hard times.
This allows me to PVP and not have more fun and not worry about the cost if I loose. Which happens often.
Economic lesson is now concluded...have s nice day. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
717
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 18:55:00 -
[123] - Quote
Quote:Yes because one person does it so that has to mean every miner and Indy does right? ugghh common sense.
Well, all of the ones I've found so far. It's the rare miner who won't rage at me. The vehemence unleashed at the destruction of their pixels is such that you'd think I'd absconded with their children.
Quote:Diversity, yes look it up if you need to. For me it means I mine and indy one account while ALSO ratting and relics and trading on my other dedicated pvp account.
A lot of companies do this diversity thing in real life to allow them to weather economic hard times.
At what point did anyone but you start talking about that crap, though?
Harry asked why we attack miners. My answer is, because it's more amusing, since they pitch bigger fits than anyone else. I believe they do this because they are much more prone to having an entitlement mindset. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |
Hugo Z Hackenbush
State War Academy Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 19:06:00 -
[124] - Quote
You get them Harry! Revenge is sweet! Lie in wait, then torpedo CCP HQ! That'll show 'em! Dirty rat bast.... Oh look a butterfly! Back to my meds... lalalala.
I like squirrels! Eve is like the way that gun law equals a lot of deaths followed by a lot of people being real nice to each other, well, it would be if we all had our names and address posted on our character info! I wonder just how many players would still act like assholes? Fly safe, and lock your back door tonight! |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3288
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 19:20:00 -
[125] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:Yes because one person does it so that has to mean every miner and Indy does right? ugghh common sense.
Well, all of the ones I've found so far. It's the rare miner who won't rage at me. The vehemence unleashed at the destruction of their pixels is such that you'd think I'd absconded with their children. Quote:Diversity, yes look it up if you need to. For me it means I mine and indy one account while ALSO ratting and relics and trading on my other dedicated pvp account.
A lot of companies do this diversity thing in real life to allow them to weather economic hard times.
At what point did anyone but you start talking about that crap, though? Harry asked why we attack miners. My answer is, because it's more amusing, since they pitch bigger fits than anyone else. I believe they do this because they are much more prone to having an entitlement mindset.
It's quite common in society these days for people to point their finger at others while exhibiting an inability to look in a mirror.
The sense of entitlement is across the board.
But I must ask, is not the raging from ganked miners on par with the raging against Harry's nullsec endeavors? I see the same kind of mentality in either kind of thread. Whether it's Harry saying that nullsec in part should be invaded, or somebody who was running cargo AFK in Eudema, the replies look the same.
The people claiming to be against self entitlement are showing the same sense of entitlement, as if there's some obligation to destroy entitlement, but no question as to who or what made them feel entitled to be the ones to carry out such a mission.
But in the end, while it is said that Harry's efforts mean nothing as far as making any difference in nullsec, the same can be said about ganking miners.
They have not stopped mining you see.
Isn't going to nullsec and attacking the bears out there not amusing? Seeing goons deploy trolls to the forums is not amusing? Seeing them send out bait ships and start camping the road to VFK more is not amusing? Joepopo failing to catch Harry's double-stabbed cat with an instacane (after being told in the forums by another goon that nobody puts stabs in a dessie) and then losing the instacane is not amusing?
Why is only your amusement the only legitimate kind? Where did you get that sense of entitlement? |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
717
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 19:32:00 -
[126] - Quote
Quote:But I must ask, is not the raging from ganked miners on par with the raging against Harry's nullsec endeavors?
No. In fact, I have yet to see anything that really qualifies as rage in a Harry Forever thread, that wasn't coming from Harry himself.
Rage isn't ridiculing someone who you think has an absurd idea and comports themself like a puffed up messianic figure.
Rage is closing your own threads because you can't dig up anyone else to agree with you.
Quote:The people claiming to be against self entitlement are showing the same sense of entitlement,
No, they aren't. They're laughing at you, yes. They are making fun of you, yes. But with the statement above, you are just projecting.
Quote:But in the end, while it is said that Harry's efforts mean nothing as far as making any difference in nullsec, the same can be said about ganking miners.
They have not stopped mining you see.
There is a difference, you are just missing what it is.
Quote:Why is only your amusement the only legitimate kind? Where did you get that sense of entitlement?
At what point did I ever say that it was? Projecting again. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3288
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 19:38:00 -
[127] - Quote
Ah you want to pyschobabble now. This is a standard Conan The Internet Contrarian method, as usual.
Harry has enough people NOT in the forums supplying him with ships. That matters more.
He's doing exactly what every leet pvper troll in the forums says what everybody should do. All he got for that was trolled.
I don't block people, but I will choose not to waste more time on you. Everything I say you will "wordsmith". You remind me of my ex who would pick one word out of one sentence and then spawn an entirely new argument about it. I won't say the word that applies, since you will get smug and post "reported" using ISD as your personal weapon.
|
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
719
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 19:49:00 -
[128] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Ah you want to pyschobabble now. This is a standard Conan The Internet Contrarian method, as usual.
Harry has enough people NOT in the forums supplying him with ships. That matters more.
He's doing exactly what every leet pvper troll in the forums says what everybody should do. All he got for that was trolled.
I don't block people, but I will choose not to waste more time on you. Everything I say you will "wordsmith". You remind me of my ex who would pick one word out of one sentence and then spawn an entirely new argument about it. I won't say the word that applies, since you will get smug and post "reported" using ISD as your personal weapon.
That's a really nice way to avoid my rebuttal of your nonsensical attacks. Just outright disqualify any further continuation of the conversation.
Really, step up the plate, I relish a good discussion.
Quote:But in the end, while it is said that Harry's efforts mean nothing as far as making any difference in nullsec, the same can be said about ganking miners.
They have not stopped mining you see.
Here, I'll even tell you the difference that I alluded to above.
The difference is, I am not trying to make a difference. Harry is, he has said so on numerous occasions, he had a threadnaught about it for goodness sake.
Nevermind the whole "declare victory by killing unvalued 'assets'" thing. I mean really, telling me that you are defeating the Goons by killing lather-rinse-repeat cyno alts? How could you expect not to be made fun of doing that?
You can supply him with all the ships you want, but it doesn't matter if your strategy remains the same as it has been. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3538
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 19:50:00 -
[129] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Ah you want to pyschobabble now. This is a standard Conan The Internet Contrarian method, as usual.
Harry has enough people NOT in the forums supplying him with ships. That matters more.
He's doing exactly what every leet pvper troll in the forums says what everybody should do. All he got for that was trolled.
I don't block people, but I will choose not to waste more time on you. Everything I say you will "wordsmith". You remind me of my ex who would pick one word out of one sentence and then spawn an entirely new argument about it. I won't say the word that applies, since you will get smug and post "reported" using ISD as your personal weapon. No it's not psychobabble.
He addressed your words. You seem to fail to understand that he did that. You also seem to lack the ability to reflect your own words.
You should try addressing what he said, instead of just dismissing it like a moron who is unable to realize that his opposite is trying to have an *actual* conversation.
You're the timewaster here. He's not a "wordsmith", he is intelligent enough to understand words and their meanings, while you seem to just use them, without actually understanding them.
The issue lies with you, not him. If you really read and understood his word, instead of just reading and projecting, you would be able to have a conversation about it ... but you can't. *can't*. Not "not want".
Try it, you might learn something. |
Cyonsiaros StrawHat
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 20:14:00 -
[130] - Quote
You're a wizard Harry. |
|
flakeys
Antwerpse Kerels R O G U E
1323
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 20:22:00 -
[131] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:Pierrot le fou wrote:Looks like Harry got tricked into believing that someone was going to help him defeat the evil Goon Empire, but alas... King Harry of Highsec, first of his name, lord protector of the 4 highsec realms, was too gullible and naive to suspect anything. Show us the killmail Harry! check it out, its on the killboard, but you missunderstand naivity with honesty, I'm honest, the others did liehonesty brings you further in life, wherelse liars are shortsighted and will suffer at the end gather some experience in life and you sure come to the same conclusion, trust me that its not different in a game either
Uhm they lied because they knew you are naive ....
Honesty brings you further in life you say?This is eve , in eve honesty brings you 3 steps back ... i should know as i am allways honest in eve and it never helped me out in any way.
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|
Rhivre
TarNec Invisible Exchequer
363
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 21:05:00 -
[132] - Quote
Maybe they lied to harry cos they didnt like him :) |
E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
246
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 21:08:00 -
[133] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:Yes because one person does it so that has to mean every miner and Indy does right? ugghh common sense.
Well, all of the ones I've found so far. It's the rare miner who won't rage at me. The vehemence unleashed at the destruction of their pixels is such that you'd think I'd absconded with their children. Quote:Diversity, yes look it up if you need to. For me it means I mine and indy one account while ALSO ratting and relics and trading on my other dedicated pvp account.
A lot of companies do this diversity thing in real life to allow them to weather economic hard times.
At what point did anyone but you start talking about that crap, though? Harry asked why we attack miners. My answer is, because it's more amusing, since they pitch bigger fits than anyone else. I believe they do this because they are much more prone to having an entitlement mindset. It's quite common in society these days for people to point their finger at others while exhibiting an inability to look in a mirror. The sense of entitlement is across the board. But I must ask, is not the raging from ganked miners on par with the raging against Harry's nullsec endeavors? I see the same kind of mentality in either kind of thread. Whether it's Harry saying that nullsec in part should be invaded, or somebody who was running cargo AFK in Eudema and got smacked, the replies look the same. The people claiming to be against self entitlement are showing the same sense of entitlement, as if there's some obligation to destroy entitlement, but no question as to who or what made them feel entitled to be the ones to carry out such a mission. But in the end, while it is said that Harry's efforts mean nothing as far as making any difference in nullsec, the same can be said about ganking miners. They have not stopped mining you see. Isn't going to nullsec and attacking the bears out there not amusing? Seeing goons deploy trolls to the forums is not amusing? Seeing them send out bait ships and start camping the road to VFK more is not amusing? Joepopo failing to catch Harry's double-stabbed cat with an instacane (after being told in the forums by another goon that nobody puts stabs in a dessie) and then losing the instacane is not amusing? When we bombed the Mittangrad undock, I was giggling like Loreena Bobbit in a sausage factory. I do the same in COD when I sneak up on people and smack them in the head with a rifle butt. Is that not amusing? Why is only your amusement the only legitimate kind? Where did you get that sense of entitlement? You made the statement that all miners have a sense of entitlement.
As I pointed out many different people mine, myself encluded to support my PVP. I also pointed out that you assumption was not true or accurate.
That is where diversity came in. I due many things to fund my play style.
Hope this helps you understand better. Have a nice day. |
Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
261
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 21:11:00 -
[134] - Quote
Yet another shiny example of Harry-logic.
Huzzah!
Also: Show me on this ship's blueprints where the bad safari touched you... |
Cynter DeVries
Spheroidal Projections
575
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 21:20:00 -
[135] - Quote
There need be no such mechanic Harry. Part of the point of Eve is the trust game.
A good litmus test for whether a mechanics change in Eve makes sense is the number and complexity of exceptions to the mechanic you'd need to introduce for the game to still work. The requirements for special cases in your requested feature make it unworkable:
Make it so the fleet members can't target each other.
>> what about Logistics?
Except logistics.
>> What if I have logi drones but my ship has weapon systems?
Only the logi drones work not the guns or missiles or other drones or neuts or nos or...
---
You have to except the world to make the feature work, and that's a key indicator of bad design.
Also, didn't you make that thread on the fast food generation? Isn't it akin to a fast food version of Eve to erode the trust meta-game? You should enjoy the full complexity of the game and employ your own interpersonal skills to discern the intent of your fellow players. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
720
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 21:26:00 -
[136] - Quote
Quote: You made the statement that all miners have a sense of entitlement.
As I pointed out many different people mine, myself encluded to support my PVP. I also pointed out that you assumption was not true or accurate.
That is where diversity came in. I due many things to fund my play style.
Hope this helps you understand better. Have a nice day.
No, I made the statement that miners' sense of entitlement makes them explode in an impotent fit of rage when they get ganked, or bumped, or when the word "permit" is even jokingly brought up.
And I find that hilarious.
It has nothing to do with how you make money. Nothing whatsoever. Why anyone would bring up exploration in that context, I do not know.
I also stated that I doubt the veracity of your statement that you do this to fund pvp. Given what an outspoken carebear advocate you are on the forums, that is. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
632
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 21:33:00 -
[137] - Quote
Cynter DeVries wrote:There need be no such mechanic Harry. Part of the point of Eve is the trust game.
A good litmus test for whether a mechanics change in Eve makes sense is the number and complexity of exceptions to the mechanic you'd need to introduce for the game to still work. The requirements for special cases in your requested feature make it unworkable:
Make it so the fleet members can't target each other.
>> what about Logistics?
Except logistics.
>> What if I have logi drones but my ship has weapon systems?
Only the logi drones work not the guns or missiles or other drones or neuts or nos or...
---
You have to except the world to make the feature work, and that's a key indicator of bad design.
Also, didn't you make that thread on the fast food generation? Isn't it akin to a fast food version of Eve to erode the trust meta-game? You should enjoy the full complexity of the game and employ your own interpersonal skills to discern the intent of your fellow players.
I think you people are all not playing the game, nullsec is empty and there are reasons for that, ccp has to do everything to make people go there in groups and fight... too much **** is holding this up
I already mentioned that the logi stuff could be excluded, thats not hard to program
too much waiting and nothing happening, and if something happens its over soon because some douches shoot others in fleet, **** that https:// |
Tyrton
Imbecile MIiss Managment and Disasters Intergalactic Interstellar Interns
41
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 21:39:00 -
[138] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:Tialano Utrigas wrote:If someone starts shooting friendlies, you simply kick them from fleet and primary them.
Every meaningful fleet has logi which need to lock someone to repair them.
If your corp is full of morons like that, I suggest you leave the corp (or the game) then they simply make an exception for logi stuff its not a corp thing, it would make it easier for solo and new players to randomly fleetup
right i can put three 595's in my highs on my schimy or 2 auto cannons and a missile launcher the game will no that you are targeted by a logi ........ no exploit in this at all |
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
632
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 21:49:00 -
[139] - Quote
Tyrton wrote:Harry Forever wrote:Tialano Utrigas wrote:If someone starts shooting friendlies, you simply kick them from fleet and primary them.
Every meaningful fleet has logi which need to lock someone to repair them.
If your corp is full of morons like that, I suggest you leave the corp (or the game) then they simply make an exception for logi stuff its not a corp thing, it would make it easier for solo and new players to randomly fleetup right i can put three 595's in my highs on my schimy or 2 auto cannons and a missile launcher the game will no that you are targeted by a logi ........ no exploit in this at all
you think a programmer can not exclude the autocannon and missiles? god you people here... https:// |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
720
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 22:01:00 -
[140] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:Tyrton wrote:Harry Forever wrote:Tialano Utrigas wrote:If someone starts shooting friendlies, you simply kick them from fleet and primary them.
Every meaningful fleet has logi which need to lock someone to repair them.
If your corp is full of morons like that, I suggest you leave the corp (or the game) then they simply make an exception for logi stuff its not a corp thing, it would make it easier for solo and new players to randomly fleetup right i can put three 595's in my highs on my schimy or 2 auto cannons and a missile launcher the game will no that you are targeted by a logi ........ no exploit in this at all you think a programmer can not exclude the autocannon and missiles? god you people here...
You're... truly an idiot.
As usual, some fool spent the night at a Holiday Inn Express and thinks he knows everything about programming. Hate to tell you, but you can't snap your fingers and make something any less impossible.
What you are talking about is excluding targeting. Not activation of modules, targeting.
There is no effing way to do such a thing without opening it up to ludicrous abuse. Final. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |
|
Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
262
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 22:48:00 -
[141] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:Tyrton wrote:Harry Forever wrote:Tialano Utrigas wrote:If someone starts shooting friendlies, you simply kick them from fleet and primary them.
Every meaningful fleet has logi which need to lock someone to repair them.
If your corp is full of morons like that, I suggest you leave the corp (or the game) then they simply make an exception for logi stuff its not a corp thing, it would make it easier for solo and new players to randomly fleetup right i can put three 595's in my highs on my schimy or 2 auto cannons and a missile launcher the game will no that you are targeted by a logi ........ no exploit in this at all you think a programmer can not exclude the autocannon and missiles? god you people here... Why *should* they? All these exclusions and exceptions you're asking for are sloppy, bad design - Wasteful of developer time and CPU cycles. |
Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
425
|
Posted - 2013.08.10 01:06:00 -
[142] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:OK so I only read the OP and basically, we could see this is a "switch option". If I am talking to my friends on the phone, I don't have to tell them where I am.
So what's being asked for here is a option to prevent giving your location - to anybody.
And what could be wrong with that? What with OGB (and the abuse thereof) you'd think people would want this - to be able to totally protect their untanked off grid command ship.
And we all know how people who fully exploit mechanics to their advantage are never ashamed to ask for more, right?
Don't stare down at your feet. You know who you are.
While there is nothing wrong with what the OP suggest, I will already predict, not having read the thread that he's getting the usual troll responses. I also predict that half of them are from people whose very killboards rely on what the OP is describing. I'm sure there will be the usual sprinkling of people beholden to "the system" as well, having once might have been someone who would have wanted such a feature, but then having been emotionally hurt from being ganked, coped with it by becoming a douchebag too.
Hence a lot of douchebag responses that I have not read yet.
I'll get around to it, if I feel like wasting time. You should read the responses on a comment before responding. The response is this: This is an addition which would add another level of safety, and thus remove a portion of the game mechanics that make EVE the game that is is. EVE is based on the idea that building trust is incredibly important. Other MMOs will allow you to be able to team instantly with random strangers and have a fun party time, but that's not the way EVE works. With EVE, you need to build and destroy relationships, always with the understanding that things are not always as they seem. That level of meta gameplay is what makes EVE unique, and detracting from that would be going against all of the work that has gone into EVE since it's creation.
The OP is suggesting this idea because it fulfils his immediate need, without any thought on how it affects the whole game. This is understandable, as he is very new to the game. What people get frustrated with is that once they disagree with his posts, he throws around insults and abuse blocking people left right and centre. This leads to situations like me. I will automatically respond to Harry's posts more aggressively that most others as I know the responses I'm likely to receive if I poke any holes in his ideas. I'm sure a lot of the others feel the same. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |
Black Panpher
Biohazard.
38
|
Posted - 2013.08.10 01:21:00 -
[143] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:Because fleets let people shoot eachother legally...
Another quality thread by our great forum warrior Hairy Forever!
Because all PVP happens in high sex. Nice self ownage!
|
Georgina Parmala
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
137
|
Posted - 2013.08.10 01:42:00 -
[144] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:lockon to fleet members should be removable by the fleetcommander after leaving fleet there should be a 1-5 minute timer, where you are not able to lockon to old fleetmembers either
Wow, that's an AWESOME IDEA!!!
Now I can start up a fleet and jump in a logi. I'll get some "bro's" in the fleet and take them out to aggress some "targets". Then I can disable fleet member targeting and rep the targets, becoming an invulnerable logistics ship regardless of the system's security status, corp affiliation or suspect timer! You're brilliant!
Harry Forever wrote: this would assure more random people team up, good for the game, bad for douchebags... win win
Wait, what?
|
SKINE DMZ
YouView INC
100
|
Posted - 2013.08.10 01:42:00 -
[145] - Quote
Common sense is high in this thread I disagree |
Georgina Parmala
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
137
|
Posted - 2013.08.10 02:01:00 -
[146] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote: I already mentioned that the logi stuff could be excluded, thats not hard to program
Are you serious? Like really?
You want every offensive module / drone cycle to check not just the target's current fleet association, but also fleet membership history (or time down a flag to check against for every fleet they recently joined/left)?
This would obviously not have any negative repercussions on server performance with 4500 people and 20 fleets in system. Nope. None whatsoever.
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
634
|
Posted - 2013.08.10 06:16:00 -
[147] - Quote
Georgina Parmala wrote:Harry Forever wrote:lockon to fleet members should be removable by the fleetcommander after leaving fleet there should be a 1-5 minute timer, where you are not able to lockon to old fleetmembers either
Wow, that's an AWESOME IDEA!!! Now I can start up a fleet and jump in a logi. I'll get some "bro's" in the fleet and take them out to aggress some "targets". Then I can disable fleet member targeting and rep the targets, becoming an invulnerable logistics ship regardless of the system's security status, corp affiliation or suspect timer! You're brilliant! Harry Forever wrote: this would assure more random people team up, good for the game, bad for douchebags... win win
Wait, what?
we already mentioned that the logi stuff could be excluded, don't be so pigheaded... whats wrong with you people, you get stuck too often, stay flexible in your minds, this is rediculous
you only get not targetable by your own fleetmembers when you leave fleet https:// |
SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1945
|
Posted - 2013.08.10 06:49:00 -
[148] - Quote
I think the weirdest logic here is that anyone would want to team up with a bunch of random nerds when they can just play with their friends.
|
Remiel Pollard
Layman's terms TAXU
1589
|
Posted - 2013.08.10 07:37:00 -
[149] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:I think the weirdest logic here is that anyone would want to team up with a bunch of random nerds when they can just play with their friends.
That would be assuming they have friends..... You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8566
|
Posted - 2013.08.10 07:52:00 -
[150] - Quote
if you don't want to get screwed by people in your fleet, stay in highsec and leave lowsec/0.0 to those with a stronger backbone
stop demanding that CCP make sweeping changes to the game to accommodate you Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |