I'm curious on where this 99% figure is coming from? Oh right you just threw out a random percentage.

Also mind stating what fiasco or what is the issue is with the current untested proposed changes?

Where is the that number coming from? Well from reading the thread. Try it sometime. In 32 pages (currenlty) maybe 10 poeple have said they like the changes.

Again read the thread there are 32 pages explaining it.

Where is the that number coming from? Well from reading the thread. Try it sometime. In 32 pages (currenlty) maybe 10 poeple have said they like the changes.



Again read the thread there are 32 pages explaining it.

Just curious if any devs are reading that dev blog thread and if they actually plan on participating like was stated they would. Becuase as it stands about 99% do not like what was proposed.

For one I'm not going to read all 32 pages, however just reading the first 4-5 pages shows that most(see what I did there) are OK with the changes and feel its a good start. There is no fiasco, the sky isn't falling its incremental changes that all around are for the best. Your 99% figure is still ******** and shows you have very little argument, which is why you throw out a random high percentage number to try and prove a non existing point.


edit: since when is retarded censored. Thats some bullshit.

I'm curious on where this 99% figure is coming from? Oh right you just threw out a random percentage.

Also mind stating what fiasco or what is the issue is with the current untested proposed changes?

Usually when you say a number is wrong you point to the correct number. So Yes 99% of the people in that thread say the changes dont go far enough. Dont believe me read it yourself or stfu.
And funny the guy saying the rebalance is fine is mimatar go figure... Guess your happy with your Hail buff, effectivly doubling your kite range with your highest damage ammo. Meanwhile void stays the same.

Just curious if any devs are reading that dev blog thread and if they actually plan on participating like was stated they would. Becuase as it stands about 99% do not like what was proposed.

Probably safe to say that the 99% you speak of are gallente ship pilots so theyre hardly likely to settle for anything less than "OMGBBQ!!1!!1!" ? Let's see how they play out on SISI before leaping to judgements.

C.

Where is the that number coming from? Well from reading the thread. Try it sometime. In 32 pages (currenlty) maybe 10 poeple have said they like the changes.



Again read the thread there are 32 pages explaining it.

I'm curious on where this 99% figure is coming from? Oh right you just threw out a random percentage.

The majority of people I've spoken to are really happy with the changes. Maybe you were expecting some massive power creep but thats the last thing we need. The changes bring Hybrids firmly back in line, open a whole ton of new fits that previously were just not feasible in PvP and PvE, and now fair game.

There is more to it that just damage and tracking.

Also, 99% I too like pulling numbers out my ass.

Get a grip lad.

I know a lot of players have been asking for better tracking for years, now that they give better tracking ... you complain?

No, he's probably part of the group that stayed silent all those years. One vocal minority versus another vocal minority.

<3 hybrid changes.

Clearly I am part of the 1% D: I am the problem. Come out of hiding 99% and make me pay you money for my appreciation of the fantastic hybrid changes.

hybrids are impossible to fix, take them out of the game.

the proposed changes are proving me right.

hybrids are impossible to fix, take them out of the game.

the proposed changes are proving me right.

Yea, blasters are so useless I decided to spend the last year using them almost exclusivly and laughed as ship after ship burned up under my neutron blasters pitifull firepower.

Yea, blasters are so useless I decided to spend the last year using them almost exclusivly and laughed as ship after ship burned up under my neutron blasters pitifull firepower.

Once you go blaster, you never go back!

I love them! I get irked when I can't track, so I'm excited by the change! Less cap usage = win, especially given the power of capless faction ammo projectiles.

With that ideology all weapon systems other then AC/Arty should be removed then.

What exactly is your vaginal leakage about? Note I don't think you're really leaking, but since you took liberty with the facts (e.g. 99%, I've decided to be just as fluid).

I see what you did there.

On topic, its a step in the right dirction. But boosting winmatar at the same time is not a good idea, and will only prolong the balance battle.

I've always thoguht of autocannons as fast firing, low damage weapons, and blasters as slower firing but higher damage weapons. Both of them should be short-ranged. With AC being capless, what benefit do blasters get to make them balanced? If not capless, then what? They also have crappy range compared to AC. Better tracking is a good start.

Just curious if any devs are reading that dev blog thread and if they actually plan on participating like was stated they would. Becuase as it stands about 99% do not like what was proposed.

Don't think its a fiasco at all. Seems like CCP pretty much nailed a big problem mith large and medium sized blasters - tracking.

Allthough I'm not sure I like the reduced pg and cpu requirements across the board. Such changes feels like very "cheap" fixes. Havent tried it tho so it might not be a huge deal...

Tracking was the show-stopper for blasters. There is still going to be an issue with employment (the whole self scramming thing). Most blaster pilots are over that anyway, you have to know that if anything goes wrong you are going to be in a bad place with a blaster boat.

Maybe I'll actually be a able to sneak a real heavy neut on my Mega without fitting mods, its be nice to undock it to do something other than play with station hugging carriers.

I was hoping these changes would let me fly a dual rep neutron mega

I thought a 20% flat damage boost was applied to blasters and 10% to rails.

Unless I miss-read it.

At 20% my Neutron Brutix is going to be pushing something like 900dps without heat, not bad for a lowely T1 BC.

Its not going to make the diemost anymore desirable but it'll be fun.

I thought a 20% flat damage boost was applied to blasters and 10% to rails.

Unless I miss-read it.

At 20% my Neutron Brutix is going to be pushing something like 900dps without heat, not bad for a lowely T1 BC.

Its not going to make the diemost anymore desirable but it'll be fun.

99% players think changes are fine and do not post at all (or they do not just care)

Reading comprehension fail, its a trancking speed increase, not a damage stat increase.

Tracking Speed Increase:

All blaster turrets: +20% to Tracking speed

Oh sure, people will use less effective weaponry simply because they like the ship or whatever, in a game you also want to have fun and flying in a ship whose design is especially appealing to you contributes to it.
But as soon as you enter pvp against competent opponents, you lose 9/10 times, and that 1 time you will win only because everybody will sooner or later make mistakes, therefore allowing you a victory.

I know that you like yourself a nano-blastermega. Since armortanked megas are far, far more common, people will underestimate your speed and agility seriously and therefore getting easily into blasterrange.

But the deciding factor is not the quality of your weapons or the ship or even your piloting skills, it is simply information warfare: wrong assumptions will lead to wrong decisions in battle.

Against a competent opponent that allows for the possibility of more unusual fits you are toast.

I am the 1%!

I'll stick to my canes.

Where is the that number coming from? Well from reading the thread. Try it sometime. In 32 pages (currenlty) maybe 10 poeple have said they like the changes.

Well you got a buff, that's already something?!

The rocket "fix" wasn't really overwhelming but not that bad either. Just tone down your expectations a bit.

My current mega is now 3 months old and I am now in a position where every FC welcomes her and the general assumption is the mega will most likely survive on every roam. This 9/10 rubbish is compleatly unfounded. It doesnt matter how competent a drake pilot is when a single good volly rips off 1/3 of their sheilds.

Well, i-¦m happy for you but people flying around in battleships with lasers and projectiles are quite confident that their weapons are actually a danger for other battleships as well. And they will tear you apart 9 times out of 10. Because you will be already dead before you come close enough to do damage.

Yea this didnt happen the last time I ran into a gang of abaddons or any of the other BS I have run into over the last few months. Infact, looking back to my last hyperions untimely death I managed to get in range and take down several BS. Turns out that most fights happen within 20km of a gate which is well within range of my guns.

Perhaps you should fly these ships before spouting you're drival on the forums.

99% players think changes are fine and do not post at all (or they do not just care)

Yea this didnt happen the last time I ran into a gang of abaddons or any of the other BS I have run into over the last few months. Infact, looking back to my last hyperions untimely death I managed to get in range and take down several BS. Turns out that most fights happen within 20km of a gate which is well within range of my guns.

Perhaps you should fly these ships before spouting you're drival on the forums.

So far it seem's that 99% of people think you'll full of it.

I fly hybrid boats alot, I PVP blaster boats alot, and blasters arent the problem. It's the gal ships lack of pg, speed,

and cpu thats' the problem.

From what i've read to date most Gal ships are getting a speed and agility buff, AND, having their main weapons systems fine tuned for reduced pg and cpu.

I dont see any kind of fiasco in the making. It might not completely solve all the issues but it's a step in the right direction.

Personaly i'm looking forward to the changes. Stop whining.

It-¦s not a fiasco because every other outcome was impossible from the start. There can be no hybrid fix that is putting them back in the game.
Second page in this thread, my posting near the bottom. My logic is irrefutable. There is no loophole. Fixing hybrids is not feasible, there is no room for them in this game.

lol ... I don't even know where to begin. There is NO ROOM? NONE? ZERO? wow .. ok no arguments then, you're too brilliantz!

Honestly, I'd rather they make small changes over time to actually fix something, rather than break the game more.

We as players do not have to test to whine and complain like overgrown children screaming at their mothers on sugar withdrawal