| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Turin
   |
Posted - 2006.02.06 18:51:00 -
[211]
 Originally by: dalman
Edited by: dalman on 05/02/2006 01:28:56
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: fisho
Should SA die, of which i am not sure will happen. I just hope that FIX don't try to claim any victory. We have already seen that you can't take SA, and were desperate for a NAP, but now seem to be all for war now every man and his dog is against SA.
Erm, fisho - FIX were fighting against 3 times their number - against SA I think it was fairly equal, against SA and friends they certainly did lose some ground - now the boot is on the other foot, and suddenly it's "different"?
Just doesn't compute with me.
Dianabolic, cut the crap.
FIX alliance had higher numbers than SA.
FIX trial corps (doing more fighting than their full members) has surely the same numbers as HF were sending.
TRIAD corps (though only on rare occations in Q) can easily be compared to the KAOS pilots who were there for 1 1/2 week.
FIX weren't outnumbered. Neither in total numbers, nor on the battlefield.
On the contrary, 22 hours a day they outnumbered us in local in both FAT, 9CG and H74. The problem was they spent 21 of these hours at their POSes.
At the same time, some of them showed great dedication; in some battle there were pilots getting new ships from station to die 3 times in one single battle.
The only conclusion is that they lacked alot in leadership. Only when Major Riven (FoFF) were around did they seem to have any organisation at all.
*edit* btw, neither you nor anyone else answered my question about how your signature relates to this situation 
bhahahahha. What a crock of sh!t. I was there. This is a blatant lie. We were almost always outnumberd. KAOS was only there 2 weeks, but they had a DREAD fleet. like that is something to write off as if it didnt happen or something.
|
Christopher Multsanti
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 19:01:00 -
[212]
I don't know why this war started and I don't care, I just like supporting the underdogs. GL Stain.
Death and Glory in H-PA
|
ProphetGuru
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 19:09:00 -
[213]
Originally by: Xelios
This isn't meant as an attack, but I honestly wonder what BoB's response would have been had the cease fire talks with FIX broken down completely.
We'll never know now of course, but one thing I can say with confidence is that had we decided to come calling you would have been made aware of it. We don't and never have Pearl Harbor'd our allies, regardless of Cpt pug and Bauns revisionist history of our dismantling of that which we created, FA.
Either way, as you say, :) targets are good and it should be fun 
Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
|
dalman
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 19:22:00 -
[214]
Originally by: Turin
bhahahahha. What a crock of sh!t. I was there. This is a blatant lie. We were almost always outnumberd. KAOS was only there 2 weeks, but they had a DREAD fleet. like that is something to write off as if it didnt happen or something.
Uhh, what?
You know we didn't destroy any POS, right?
We took one (not in FAT) into reinforce mode, but traid came to help and stopped the destruction of it (at expence of many ships).
And we did one(1!) assault on a POS in FAT (which KAOS dreads were part of). That assault was however aborted: the system was so lagged out that our fleet couldn't assist our dreads in a correct way(it'd be killed like flies by the POS in that lag) if you would have had the balls to attack.
And no dreads were used in any fleet combat.
So how exactly is the 3? Dreads KAOS sent in important for the outcome of the war?
Your comment about numbers is about as accurate as your description of how important these dreads were in the war.
Drink up, shoot in. Let the beating begin.
Distributor of pain. Your loss becomes my gain...
|
USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:38:00 -
[215]
Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers
USN
|
Wee Dave
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:43:00 -
[216]
It's good to see we're in tin hat season again.
|
Righteous Fury
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:43:00 -
[217]
Originally by: USN CVN73
Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers
USN
Okay, seriously, just stop. You have surpassed the bounds of stupidity into the uncharted realm of utter moronic retardism. Someone please get rid of this assclown.
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:43:00 -
[218]
Originally by: USN CVN73
Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers
USN
Were you dropped one your head whilst wearing a tin foil hat as a child?
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|
Sarigar Shunn
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:50:00 -
[219]
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Sarigar Shunn
Dianabolic, I know this is off topic, but your sig is actually a Benjamin Franklin quote.
Thanks for the comment, but you are in-fact incorrect.
I can't read the link without registering!
I've used the quote extensively since it's become relevant.
Yours is actually a common paraphrase of one attributed to Ben Franklin: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." from the intro page of "An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania", published in 1789.
here's a link: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin
a page in which some guy buys an original copy of the book to check if the quote's actually there: http://www.futureofthebook.com/stories/storyReader$605
(I wish I had the kind of money this guy spends just to fact check!)
Anyway, just google it. It's such a cool quote that it should be properly attributed.
To keep this reply on-topic: Go SA!
|
USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:50:00 -
[220]
yup rightious fury
USN smokes *****! I will post what i feel is correct. i pay my own accounts and i do as i please. if you dont want to read it thats up to u but to make outright flames is inmature and totally uncalled for.
Rightious Fury. go learn how to be a man and stop flaming.
USN
|
ProphetGuru
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:54:00 -
[221]
Edited by: ProphetGuru on 06/02/2006 20:54:22
Originally by: USN CVN73
Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts
Quote:
With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix
Classic example of forum detectives convincing themself they are right cuz ummmm like.. it sounds like a good one.
Dude, you went from "suspicion of"... to "duh it's clear".. in 1 paragraph.
One of the true constants in life is that people who say, "it's clear" or "clearly" are usually trying to convince themself of their own misguided opinion.
Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
|
USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 21:03:00 -
[222]
noone ever said i was a good writer. but thank you for that english lesson...
|
Weco
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 21:03:00 -
[223]
I think you are quite close to the truth there USN, however you forgot to include the illegal nuclear tests Molle is running in his backyard, and the mutant ninja dogs Dianabolic is hiding in his subterrainian facility called "the lair". Seriously, stop posting on eve-o, youre just embarassing your alliance.
____________________________________________
My sig? |
Sochin
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 21:23:00 -
[224]
Originally by: USN CVN73
Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers
USN
Let me quote the great film Billy Madison to answer this:
"What you just said is the most insanely idiotic thing I have ever heard. At no point were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it."
Nemo me impune lacessit
|
Turin
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 21:33:00 -
[225]
Just have to agree with whateverone else said regarding USN's BOB = FIX comments.
That might by chance be the most retarded thing I have read on these forums in months.
BOB = FIX. We had a blast letting you beat up our alts that we formed FIX with. Now that you ****ed us off, we are bringing our MAINS in BOB to crush you.....
Ya. makes total sense to me.
|
HC MasiEEE
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 21:43:00 -
[226]
USN CVN73 post might be "retarted", but it made me laugh and i needed that 
____________
HC MasiEEE
|
BirdBleed
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 22:01:00 -
[227]
Edited by: BirdBleed on 06/02/2006 22:01:21
Originally by: USN CVN73
Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers
USN
Does that mean we are alts of alts ? 
damn im gonna forget who my main is if this keeps up
|
Rexthor Hammerfists
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 22:30:00 -
[228]
damn funny ;)
-
Purple Conquered The World, We the Universe.
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 22:45:00 -
[229]
Originally by: Sarigar Shunn
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Sarigar Shunn
Dianabolic, I know this is off topic, but your sig is actually a Benjamin Franklin quote.
Thanks for the comment, but you are in-fact incorrect.
I can't read the link without registering!
I've used the quote extensively since it's become relevant.
Yours is actually a common paraphrase of one attributed to Ben Franklin: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." from the intro page of "An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania", published in 1789.
here's a link: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin
a page in which some guy buys an original copy of the book to check if the quote's actually there: http://www.futureofthebook.com/stories/storyReader$605
(I wish I had the kind of money this guy spends just to fact check!)
Anyway, just google it. It's such a cool quote that it should be properly attributed.
To keep this reply on-topic: Go SA!
ugh, that should be a public forum. OK, here's teh post:
I post this here so I can link my sig to it, to stop repeating myself :)
My signature on the eve-o forums, at this time:
Quote:
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
I've attributed those words to Thomas Jefferson, as according to various internet sources (and civilisation 4, where I first saw the quote) these were his, exact, words. However, the first time someone questioned the quote, he did so by stating that these words were those of Benjamin Franklin.
So, I looked it up: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin.
Franklins' quote was subtley different, though I will surely concede that he was the first to illustrate the connection that Jefferson later picked up on:
Quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
So, I compared the two; because in my opinion the two quotes have very different meanings. Franklin refers to a temporary sacrifice, Jeffersons' quote, at least to me, indicates something more permanent. Franklin also refers to "essential" liberty, a concept which I actually find quite impossible to grasp - for as humans, other than food, water and shelter, there is nothing in our lives that is "essential". Jefferson just refers to them as they are, with no emphasis importance.
For that reason, though I certainly agree with Franklins' words and the concept he puts forward, it most certainly is Thomas Jeffersons words, in full knowledge of what they mean and the context in which they were said, that I have in my signature.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|
USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 22:58:00 -
[230]
we play this game to have fun right? if we cant laugh at some insane thought such as my posting. the game should be Real life then. Wont you agree? Forums are not supposed to be so serious nor should it be like real life politics. Damn if i wanted to hear real life stuffs all i would do is turn on CNN...
But i pay my Earned $ to play a game and to post on forums as i see fit as long as it is not degrading to any one person. I am following the rules set forth by CCP in posting things that i see may be going on regardless if it is fact or fiction. Its up to the rest of eve to say USN is completely crazy or perhaps some of the stuff he says have some truth.
Over all i am very pleased with the response to my recent post only one i am extremely disappointed with is Rightous Fury. His direct flame toward me proves he is inmature.
Lets all take this game just a little less serious and make it just a little more fun. Thats what i try to do everytime i come up with such crazy ideas as i have done since i started playing this game in june of 2003.
Cheers
USN
|
Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:02:00 -
[231]
Originally by: Eyeshadow
Originally by: Kantar
Good luck Trig and Co.
But on a personal note :
Why MC as been hired for this war as well ??
I thought the honorable thing to do is sort it out the part involve and keep the rest out of it.
Two Alliance v One and involving Merc as well is a bit low,
I hope whoever hiried MC will reconsider and bring a clean fight to them.
There is a quote that come to mind reading all this :
Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself.
This are my 50 pence.
We were hired, in part, for our large capital fleet to destroy hostile POS in FAT-6P. Yesterday we took 6 hostile Large towers into reinforced mode and have finished off 4 as of this moment. The remaining 2 will soon be taken out aswell
The empire war is always an accompaniment to one of our contracts and we rarely take a contract without an empire war as that is one of our bigger strengths.
The reasons, the whos, the whys etc are of little consequence to us and your definition of honour (i.e. fair fights) does not enter into ours. We are paid to do a job, and a job we will do. Why you consider someone hiring us for a specific job as "a bit low" is beyond me. Someone wanted something to doing. We are here to do it
Thanks
i would have the greatest repect for the MC if i could believe this. what if insted u got the convo from some guy to be hired to fight bob on SA side. would u guys of taken the contract.
if u are truly unbiased and isk dictates your enermys then i take my hat off to the MC. it shows that you are up to fighting anyone, even if greatly outnumbered. but if as i would suspect that you guys get offers to fight both sides yet you pick the easier option [i dont know much about the MC but i would assume this is the case. correct me if i am wrong] then i have no repect for you and u are just as bad as the other band wagon jumpers.
|
Koronos
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:06:00 -
[232]
Originally by: Gronsak
<snip> [i dont know much about the MC but i would assume this is the case. <snip>
Why would you make assumptions about something you don't know much about? :)
Koronos
|
RogerWilco
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:14:00 -
[233]
I predict that SE and SA¦s death are comming soon, and that we will see trigger as a EVOL bisch soooon
|
IcedBach Jr
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:16:00 -
[234]
And why are SA's still responding to BooB smack on forumz instead of reading their own.
Praeludium to success |
Orc A
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:21:00 -
[235]
I predict some big alliances getting really bored very soon...
Heck, we're bored already...
Weren't we supposed to be dead by now...?
|
corporal hicks
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:22:00 -
[236]
Originally by: BirdBleed
Edited by: BirdBleed on 06/02/2006 22:01:21
Originally by: USN CVN73
Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers
USN
Does that mean we are alts of alts ?
damn im gonna forget who my main is if this keeps up
Roflmao, ok seriously I have to admit, I am a FIX alt, my main is wraithstorm but his main is Dianabolic but!!!! what you dont know is Diana's main is Orc A! and we have, I mean me, or was it him has played you all!
Next week...Elvis exposed as a Member of Shinra
" Stay Frosty "
|
Randay
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:30:00 -
[237]
... I'm Rick James, *****!
-------------------------------------------
"Det hSr kan betyda krig!" |
JerrySpringer
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:35:00 -
[238]
Edited by: JerrySpringer on 06/02/2006 23:38:39
Originally by: Gronsak
< MC neutral? >
Don't be fooled, MC and BoB are +++ standing, enough said. MC never took contract on any BoB aligned organization.
EDIT: let me elaborate a bit: if MC were to be hostile to BoB or their associates, they'd have plenty to lose and little to win. BoB would definitely use that opportunity to kick MC about, and MC couldn't afford the bad press. So BoB keeps MC friendly and MC knows what's good for em.
|
Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:35:00 -
[239]
Originally by: Koronos
Originally by: Gronsak
<snip> [i dont know much about the MC but i would assume this is the case. <snip>
Why would you make assumptions about something you don't know much about? :)
Koronos
thats what i put down to correct me if i was wrong
and btw selective quotes ftw. i need to do that one day by specificly just selecting quotes word by word to show how misleading it can be
|
Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:38:00 -
[240]
Originally by: USN CVN73
play this game.laugh at some insane thought. the game be Real life . Wont you agree? Forums are supposed to be serious. Damn CNN...
just useing your last post as a example of selective quating. lol its funney tbh. usually not that far. but u get what i mean, dont selective quote to put ur point across.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |