| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

TRIGGER
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:23:00 -
[1]
Today talks ceased . I openly state that from today I will not re-enter talks with either FIX nor will I talk to Tribal Souls alliance today or at any point in the future . Both said alliances will remain enemies until such time are defeated totally . I wish to thank ma bish for trying to resolve the issues we had and they were appreciated . My friendship for Evolution and their brothers remains however friendship in my eyes is obviously different to yours .
Any other entities other than the above two entering Stain space will be set hostile and will remain hostile and I urge people to consider this for the future . No matter what propoganda you will see in the coming weeks and months Stain cannot be defeated . We are the oldest of all and shall again stand the test of time . We thank our true friends who stick by us and as requested remain silent for now , this fight is ours and we will survive this without the aid of everyone and their grandma's aunties son-in-laws sisters cousin. Stain was one of the first alliances to agree totally to a united South and although such a great idea and no matter how much I personally would have liked it to happen , now , I fear , it will not because of certian entities trying to rule with a hammer rather than the toungue . For those that think a victory is coming on your part - you should have thought more.
|

Justus Imperius
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:27:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Justus Imperius on 04/02/2006 21:31:02 With all due respect
With 4 alliances all set + standinsg to each other.
ASCN / Huzzah / Tribal Souls all set u to - standing and closed space to u, You have no hope of winning, lets not forget MC aswell.
I commend you for your words and i wish you the best of luck. But no matter how Valiant or brave SA are, You will fail.
Again with all due respect. For you deserve respect, but with 5 alliances all over your space. You have two choices, surrender, or be annhliated.
Good luck
My thoughts only
We Are Recruiting |

thebold
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:28:00 -
[3]
Time To Die. ==============================================
|

strum
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:29:00 -
[4]
Well said Trigger Strum
|

HatePeace LoveWar
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:29:00 -
[5]
Good Luck Stain.
BoB and FIX may of had their reasons for fighting u, but all others who are hopping on the bandwagon ought to be ashamed of themselves.
|

Zubenelgenubi
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:31:00 -
[6]
nice post Trigger.
|

Crucifier
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:31:00 -
[7]
YAHARR |

Shin Ra
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:32:00 -
[8]
Originally by: TRIGGER Stain cannot be defeated .
Excatly, those jumping on the bandwagon should have thought about this.
Its inevitable that the SA/BoB war will not result in the destruction of either entity. Its reasonable to assume that it will result in the destruction of Tribal Souls or one of the other bandwagon jumpers tho.
|

Recluse XXX
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:34:00 -
[9]
Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar Good Luck Stain.
BoB and FIX may of had their reasons for fighting u, but all others who are hopping on the bandwagon ought to be ashamed of themselves.
/emote runs away in shame
//Rec
------------ Edited by: sausage jockey on 01/02/2006 22:02:39 We will not give up until we have penetrated the rear entrance to Stain, we hope this will hurt SA to the point they start to cry.
|

MrTriggerHappy
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:34:00 -
[10]
Indeed, nice post Trigger --------------------------------------------------- Gives out the career adivce only a psycho can give! |

bUBbLeS
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:35:00 -
[11]
<3 and cAKe for trigger
but as the mighty cAKe says
"forget what is now and see what your lord has shown you, for what was once amy be again, as the ch33se-cAKe is your once and future king."
muffins 4 vrs 17
"th3 h0ly b00k of cAKe"
|

UnIQu3
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:35:00 -
[12]
Wohoo, im so happy... targets allover + next door
Why didnt we do for christmas :)
Regards Uni
|

Revolution
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:36:00 -
[13]
interesting post, I look forward to killing more sa
|

Lucus Ranger
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:36:00 -
[14]
Death to all foes!
|

Smith
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:38:00 -
[15]
Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar Good Luck Stain.
BoB and FIX may of had their reasons for fighting u, but all others who are hopping on the bandwagon ought to be ashamed of themselves.
You are becomming more of a forum tramp than Thoth! 
|

Trey Azagthoth
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:40:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Zubenelgenubi nice post Trigger.
Best. Name. Ever.
Also, GL Stain
|

Randay
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:41:00 -
[17]
Originally by: TRIGGER with a hammer rather than the toungue
Hypocritical, tbh. Either that or propaganda. Who shot first for fear of being shot at? ------------------------------------------- "Det hSr kan betyda krig!" |

Hans Roaming
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:46:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Justus Imperius ASCN / Huzzah / Tribal Souls all set u to - standing and closed space to u, You have no hope of winning, lets not forget MC aswell.
The news article was totally incorrect about Huzzah, we have not set SA to - or denied them access to our space, we tried to get the article updated to no avail. All Huzzah did is not follow the war dec against BoB or join the renewed fighting against FIX.
President Huzzah Federation
Be all you can be, join the Huzzah Armed Forces today! |

Masta Killa
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:49:00 -
[19]
The traitors will not be forgotten, Tribal Souls must die.
GL SA. --------------------------------------
|

Gort
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:52:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Justus Imperius Edited by: Justus Imperius on 04/02/2006 21:31:02 With all due respect
With 4 alliances all set + standinsg to each other.
ASCN / Huzzah / Tribal Souls all set u to - standing and closed space to u, You have no hope of winning, lets not forget MC aswell.
I commend you for your words and i wish you the best of luck. But no matter how Valiant or brave SA are, You will fail.
Again with all due respect. For you deserve respect, but with 5 alliances all over your space. You have two choices, surrender, or be annhliated.
Good luck
My thoughts only
Justus,
In my opinion (and as history illustrates) the defeat of the underdog is not always the case.
The US thought it couldn't lose in Viet Name, and USSR thought it couldn't lose in Afganistan, either.
And so on....
It's going to be an interesting ride. We look forward to taking care of some rather nasty little situations in the South that have now become patent.
Regards,
Gort Makeup artist for the dead |

RacerX1
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:54:00 -
[21]
you know what...due to game mechanics Trigger is right, SA will never truly fall cause the dozens of stations in Stain space are NPC, hence there is no true way to get rid of them..on the other hand it doesn't mean they can't be harassed to the point that many simply leave the alliance.
I don't believe SA will ever truly disappear and I hope they don't, cause they keep many of us interested in the game as they are something to shoot at. We've only had 1 decent battle with the so far, hoping they have a better showing soon(tm)
|

Qinoly
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:56:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Hans Roaming The news article was totally incorrect about Huzzah, we have not set SA to - or denied them access to our space
SA knows this.
|

Svetlanna
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 21:56:00 -
[23]
Love you Trig!

|
|

Eshtir

|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:01:00 -
[24]
Stay on topic and no politics please.
-Eshtir
Yulai, we have a problem! You shouldnt crash your ship into the Yulai station, its not good for the donuts. -Kaemonn |
|

bUBbLeS
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:05:00 -
[25]
andm verily the mods doth smite t3h cAKe
but still th3 cAKe says
"we lub u trigger, and whats gone wont be forgotten, and we have eclairs ready for u"
can i get more obvious
|

Shamis Orzoz
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:08:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Eshtir Stay on topic and no politics please.
-Eshtir
LOL, isn't this the corp discussion thread?, How can you have no politics???
|
|

Eshtir

|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:10:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Shamis Orzoz
Originally by: Eshtir Stay on topic and no politics please.
-Eshtir
LOL, isn't this the corp discussion thread?, How can you have no politics???
No real life politics.
Yulai, we have a problem!
|
|

FenikSar
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:11:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Hans Roaming
Originally by: Justus Imperius ASCN / Huzzah / Tribal Souls all set u to - standing and closed space to u, You have no hope of winning, lets not forget MC aswell.
The news article was totally incorrect about Huzzah, we have not set SA to - or denied them access to our space, we tried to get the article updated to no avail. All Huzzah did is not follow the war dec against BoB or join the renewed fighting against FIX.
Dont worry bud Most of SA know huzzah has no hostility to us ( I say most in the hope of no flame saying "i Didnt know") peace to our true friends, Death to the turn coats and those on the bandwagon for a ounce of glory.
I Cant Read And I Cant Write But I Can Fly An Apoc.
*For Live Ingame Price Checks. Visit the ingame channel price_check.* |

Himfalath Gathos
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:13:00 -
[29]
Quote: No real life politics.
Real life? Darn, I must have taken the wrong pill
|
|

Eshtir

|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:15:00 -
[30]
If you have questions regarding moderation, please mail us at [email protected]. Dont discuss them on the forums.
-Eshtir
Yulai, we have a problem!
|
|

danneh
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:24:00 -
[31]
Good Luck.
|

Harry Voyager
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:24:00 -
[32]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't ASCN state they were simply sitting this one out?
Also, if I'm reading the map right, Tribal Souls has to travel through ASCN space to get to Stain. Does ASCN allow them to do this? I figure they can also use the BoB and FIX routes, but that limits the envelopment.
If ASCN is staying neutral, and TS does start flying armed fleets through their space, that has the potential to bring them into the conflict on Stain's side. I know that's what happened in the Stain Curse war, with Xetic, so it wouldn't be the first time.
There are a lot of possibilities here.
Harry Voyager ____________________ I'm not an idiot; I just play one on the forums. |

Shamrock
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:26:00 -
[33]
All I was saying with the cAKe which is in character with a small group of us, Is that I hope we will be back with TRIGGER and enjoy his company again. If you can't see that, I'm at a loss for words. Please put the hammer away. :(
.
|

bUBbLeS
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:26:00 -
[34]
and so t3h cAKe will get banned for agreeing with trigger
for t3h holy book of cAKe says
"t3h eaters of pi3 may take away your rights to speak, but allways your friends will be true to your heart, even though you must fight them for thier principles are agin you"
lemon shorty 3 vrs 9
|

IcedBach Jr
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:27:00 -
[35]
Signed...
And may Tribal Souls die... their betrayal will never be forgotten by any real SA and they are now SA's number one enemy.
Other entities might just consider if what SA did was smth different they would have done in the same situation before jumping on the Boobs wagon.
FIX make us KOS We attack FIX We beat FIX We get given crap by other alliance formerly friendly. We stand up for out honour and our members We stand tall but alone.
Just remember that most of SA has been in this game a long time and know how these things work and Stain is a big place.
Praeludium to success |

Thorny281
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:34:00 -
[36]
to my old allies in SA: Kick thier blighty little asses.
to my old Allies in setenta corp; without roger and Biosourcy you have no problem giving jumping on a bandwagon and betraying do you? No of course not, All the best of STC left and joined evolution didnt they? After all STC did in the Esoteria Campaign, you give in to bandwagoning. so much for dignaty.
To Evolution: Hopefully, at least one of you knows the names Ganolan and Roland. with any luck, this doesnt go down with SA as Roland... though I do hope you and fix go down like Marsilla and Balagant, BoB in shame of humilation and defeat and FiX honorably in combat.
To MASS: dont let Nick off his leash. it isnt safe.
to Stain Empire: why are you fighting SA still? you know this is your war, too?
to Vertigo Coalition: Peace brothers, go forth and ream.
to Cosmic Fusion and company: do you really like bob? Make peace and go rip evol a new one.
to G and Iron: be the Lot and King of the ahundred nights who never were and ally with stain. Even if 5 and LV fail to intercede, you and SA atre natural counterparts.
to 5 and Lotka Voltera: Most of you were CA once. I remember the comraderi we had while SA and ca fought. We frequesntly refered to one another as friend. In tribute to the alliance that never was, I do hope you hemp finish the menace that is the MC and BoB... as well as the cowards and traitors that are Setenta Corp.
|

thebold
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:46:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Shamrock All I was saying with the cAKe which is in character with a small group of us, Is that I hope we will be back with TRIGGER and enjoy his company again. If you can't see that, I'm at a loss for words. Please put the hammer away. :(
.
Out of Game everyones a freind
Apart of the game ... a true friend wouldnÆt do this, and when we stand up against this friend because we know the friend is wrong and backup our actions only to be turned on by many former friends in EVE caused by both the result of a friends actions and influence we see something...
Through action has come unclouded vision, how can we truly see goodness when all we now see is a dictatorship that seems to have corrupt alliances and many corporations within EVE through the psychological control and fear.
We are a proud band of fighters that are dedicated to our task in EVE and will be glad to spend it day by day through countless struggle to survive in our home and stand for Stain true, proud and dear for ever and ever more.
==============================================
|

Alty McAltalot
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:48:00 -
[38]
Maybe if...
o IE-EX didn't go shooting the very same people they were trying to nap (Tribal Souls) o SA agreed to the original ceasefire terms with FIX instead of trying to impose full mining, docking and NPCing rights in Querious o You didn't have such an idiot as your chief diplomat (Orc A) o You stopped ****ing off your allies with stupid and unthoughtout actions (Huzzah) o You didn't try to renege on past agreements by calling in favours from the old boys club (i.e. Molle/Evo).
Then maybe, just maybe, you wouldn't be in the mess you're in now - BOB, FIX, Exuro, MC, SE, TS and more are after your blood, Huzzah won't help you, ASCN won't get involved, very few people want to see you survive, and everyone else doesn't care.
You made your bed, you know what to do with it.
|

Foomanshoe
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:53:00 -
[39]
Good luck Stain _______________________________________________ Deadspace For Dead space!
Originally by: Oveur
To the nerfmobile!
|

Lek'karion
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:57:00 -
[40]
Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar Good Luck Stain.
BoB and FIX may of had their reasons for fighting u, but all others who are hopping on the bandwagon ought to be ashamed of themselves.
Nothing to be ashamed off for taking money to kill someone. And I know I personally look forward to seeing and testing the resolve of SA, should make some wonderful battles.
|

Shamrock
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:57:00 -
[41]
Originally by: thebold
Originally by: Shamrock All I was saying with the cAKe which is in character with a small group of us, Is that I hope we will be back with TRIGGER and enjoy his company again. If you can't see that, I'm at a loss for words. Please put the hammer away. :(
.
Out of Game everyones a freind
Apart of the game ... a true friend wouldnÆt do this, and when we stand up against this friend because we know the friend is wrong and backup our actions only to be turned on by many former friends in EVE caused by both the result of a friends actions and influence we see something...
Through action has come unclouded vision, how can we truly see goodness when all we now see is a dictatorship that seems to have corrupt alliances and many corporations within EVE through the psychological control and fear.
We are a proud band of fighters that are dedicated to our task in EVE and will be glad to spend it day by day through countless struggle to survive in our home and stand for Stain true, proud and dear for ever and ever more.
I think it's alot about perception. There are more than what we know. We depend on our leaders to make sound and solid decisions and I think we believe in our own cause. I'm not mindless and I have my own opinions but they will never get in the way of orders handed down from the top. I respect trigger and what he has done in his career. But a few lugnuts sheared off and the wheel went rolling past the truck somewhere.
|

IcedBach Jr
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:58:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Alty McAltalot Maybe if...
o IE-EX didn't go shooting the very same people they were trying to nap (Tribal Souls)
uh, Tribal attacked us before anyone else did, seems they had their ships ready.
Praeludium to success |

Seldarine
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 22:59:00 -
[43]
I was in Curse Alliance for pretty much the entire time it was alive, and that entire time we fought SA most of the time outnumbering them and occupying their space.
SA still stood strong then and they still stand strong now. The force that was CA in its prime make the entire forces that are laying seige to Stain now look like a dissorganised alt corp in comparison.
This recent conflict will not bring SA to its knees but will only strengthen its resolve. I laugh at the ppl in this thread who cannot see this. ______________________________ ______________________________
Seldarine
|

Susie Dutra
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:06:00 -
[44]
ASCN is allready involved. They have been camping/chasing poor SA industrialists all over Esoteria. Doesn't that count?
Give them hell TRIGGER. 
"You want another target? a MILITARY TARGET? THEN NAME THE SYSTEM!!" |

Amthrianius
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:13:00 -
[45]
meh, you and bob should work things out, then go pwn tribal souls together :) ---------------
|

Kazim
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:17:00 -
[46]
Sa sticking it to the man! 
Keep it smack free peeps or I'll track you down in rl and wash your mouth with a soap (happened to me, aftertaste is not good).
|

Alty McAltalot
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:18:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Kazim Sa sticking it to the man! 
Keep it smack free peeps or I'll track you down in rl and wash your mouth with a soap (happened to me, aftertaste is not good).
I think anyone who has fought SA recently knows, there is no way in hell that's gonna happen. Hell, your chief diplomat (Orc A) is one of your worst smacktards...
|

Draximus Cane
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:18:00 -
[48]
Someone needs to eat more bran :)
Well for us its just another job -------------------------------------------------
|

Andrommeda
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:19:00 -
[49]
Edited by: Andrommeda on 04/02/2006 23:19:28 narf replied to wrong thread
Andro _________________
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:32:00 -
[50]
The tongue never has been as effective as the sword, Trigger, in finding out who has the right, the might, or the will to force a situation.
Good luck, I look forward to resolving this the only real way that works: Combat.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Gouglash
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:35:00 -
[51]
This thread needs more humour.
|

Kane Jacobs
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:38:00 -
[52]
Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar Good Luck Stain.
BoB and FIX may of had their reasons for fighting u, but all others who are hopping on the bandwagon ought to be ashamed of themselves.
/signed _______________________________________________
|

Skjaldbaka
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:40:00 -
[53]
Great ;)
|

Snake Jankins
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:41:00 -
[54]
Edited by: Snake Jankins on 04/02/2006 23:41:37 Good luck Stain. Somehow I'd like to see that SA is able to win this, winning = able to defend and keep their territory. Would be a great accomplishment against such a force. But I'm a bit afraid of your egos after that.  ___________ 'Only ships can be assembled, this is a Frigate.' |

Fred0
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:45:00 -
[55]
Good luck to Stain. I have new found respect for you guys lately and how you've largely behaved during this whole saga, I really hope you whack everyone. Just remember who tries to jump on you now and who stays away and your future will be bright.
|

Fred0
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:46:00 -
[56]
Edited by: Fred0 on 04/02/2006 23:46:38

|

Kujin
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:47:00 -
[57]
Edited by: Kujin on 04/02/2006 23:47:28
Quote: I wish to thank ma bish for trying to resolve the issues we had and they were appreciated . My friendship for Evolution and their brothers remains however friendship in my eyes is obviously different to yours .
yeah thereŠs a difference between friendship and licking someoneŠs a** trigger... (personal opinion )
|

Fi T'Zeh
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:49:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Kujin Edited by: Kujin on 04/02/2006 23:47:28
Quote: I wish to thank ma bish for trying to resolve the issues we had and they were appreciated . My friendship for Evolution and their brothers remains however friendship in my eyes is obviously different to yours .
yeah thereŠs a difference between friendship and licking someoneŠs a** trigger... (personal opinion )
Hush, you have no idea what he's talking about. ....
|

Kujin
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 23:50:00 -
[59]
Edited by: Kujin on 04/02/2006 23:50:35
Originally by: Fi T'Zeh
Originally by: Kujin Edited by: Kujin on 04/02/2006 23:47:28
Quote: I wish to thank ma bish for trying to resolve the issues we had and they were appreciated . My friendship for Evolution and their brothers remains however friendship in my eyes is obviously different to yours .
yeah thereŠs a difference between friendship and licking someoneŠs a** trigger... (personal opinion )
Hush, you have no idea what he's talking about.
oh really ??
pls enlighten me with your wisdom m8
edit : eve-mail for teh win
|

Goberth Ludwig
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:02:00 -
[60]
uh wtf is going on?
*puzzled*
btw just wanted to say hi to thebold o/ I know you guys have real ballz when fighting
- Gob (also known as Admiral Goberius) |

Kaeten
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:04:00 -
[61]

 Latest Movie: RKK - Meatshield |

Kamikaze1
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:05:00 -
[62]
bla bla bla sa 4 ever
Originally by: SirMolle
Stain will be wiped out. Goodbye.
|

Loftur sterki
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:16:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Draximus Cane Someone needs to eat more bran :) Well for us its just another job[/quote
Are you man enough to tell from wich wallets your beein paid, as Molle said it wasn't his 
|

HatePeace LoveWar
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:26:00 -
[64]
Originally by: Smith
Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar Good Luck Stain.
BoB and FIX may of had their reasons for fighting u, but all others who are hopping on the bandwagon ought to be ashamed of themselves.
You are becomming more of a forum tramp than Thoth! 
I've always been a forum *****, its just ppl dont recognise it cos i got Reverend Necrona banned :(
|

Agent Kenshin
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:26:00 -
[65]
Originally by: Loftur sterki
Originally by: Draximus Cane Someone needs to eat more bran :) Well for us its just another job
Are you man enough to tell from wich wallets your beein paid, as Molle said it wasn't his 
If we did then what would be the point of client confidentiality??? Sorry not gonna happen.
Originally by: MAXSuicide only carebears call pvpers 'greifers'
ehehehh....
|

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:27:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Andrommeda Edited by: Andrommeda on 04/02/2006 23:19:28 narf replied to wrong thread
Andro
Hi Andro long time ;) |

Elendar
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:30:00 -
[67]
interesting yet pointless when apparently all of trigger's rights to speak for stain where overridden by orc a, who decided to throw away trigger's hard work and start an all out war
|

Sylic
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:39:00 -
[68]
I am not reading all the post after TRIGGER's post .
So on behalf of FATEX look forward to seeing you on the battlefield .
|

Sylic
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:39:00 -
[69]
I am not reading all the post after TRIGGER's post .
So on behalf of FATEX look forward to seeing you on the battlefield .
|

Tarsha Listur
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:45:00 -
[70]
GL SA
ps dont let Orc A make any more discions
|

Tarsha Listur
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:45:00 -
[71]
GL SA
ps dont let Orc A make any more discions
|

Loftur sterki
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:46:00 -
[72]
Originally by: Agent Kenshin
Originally by: Loftur sterki
Originally by: Draximus Cane Someone needs to eat more bran :) Well for us its just another job
Are you man enough to tell from wich wallets your beein paid, as Molle said it wasn't his 
If we did then what would be the point of client confidentiality??? Sorry not gonna happen.
Its pretteh obvious innit ;) MC dreads all over FAT gankin SA poses, i wonder who will fly in after the station falls.
|

Loftur sterki
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:46:00 -
[73]
Originally by: Agent Kenshin
Originally by: Loftur sterki
Originally by: Draximus Cane Someone needs to eat more bran :) Well for us its just another job
Are you man enough to tell from wich wallets your beein paid, as Molle said it wasn't his 
If we did then what would be the point of client confidentiality??? Sorry not gonna happen.
Its pretteh obvious innit ;) MC dreads all over FAT gankin SA poses, i wonder who will fly in after the station falls.
|

Thorny281
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:47:00 -
[74]
Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar
Originally by: Smith
Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar Good Luck Stain.
BoB and FIX may of had their reasons for fighting u, but all others who are hopping on the bandwagon ought to be ashamed of themselves.
You are becomming more of a forum tramp than Thoth! 
I've always been a forum *****, its just ppl dont recognise it cos i got Reverend Necrona banned :(
Lets see if Ican name them all: for OC/C4 we have: The Enslaver Kayosani The Duke himself Ckozuk Balmer Dreez Tholarim Bigfoot Hunter Lord Drax DREAMWORKS DREAMWORKS DREAMWORKS DJthebaron Kulach Rev Nec
For SA we have: Bared Bel'Medar Bared Bel'Medalt Durendal Dalman Xelios
|

Thorny281
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 00:47:00 -
[75]
Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar
Originally by: Smith
Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar Good Luck Stain.
BoB and FIX may of had their reasons for fighting u, but all others who are hopping on the bandwagon ought to be ashamed of themselves.
You are becomming more of a forum tramp than Thoth! 
I've always been a forum *****, its just ppl dont recognise it cos i got Reverend Necrona banned :(
Lets see if Ican name them all: for OC/C4 we have: The Enslaver Kayosani The Duke himself Ckozuk Balmer Dreez Tholarim Bigfoot Hunter Lord Drax DREAMWORKS DREAMWORKS DREAMWORKS DJthebaron Kulach Rev Nec
For SA we have: Bared Bel'Medar Bared Bel'Medalt Durendal Dalman Xelios
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 01:02:00 -
[76]
Originally by: fisho Should SA die, of which i am not sure will happen. I just hope that FIX don't try to claim any victory. We have already seen that you can't take SA, and were desperate for a NAP, but now seem to be all for war now every man and his dog is against SA.
Erm, fisho - FIX were fighting against 3 times their number - against SA I think it was fairly equal, against SA and friends they certainly did lose some ground - now the boot is on the other foot, and suddenly it's "different"?
Just doesn't compute with me.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 01:09:00 -
[77]
Long Live SA.
Trig nice post man...
USN CVN72&73 IEEX
|

dalman
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 01:25:00 -
[78]
Edited by: dalman on 05/02/2006 01:28:56
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: fisho Should SA die, of which i am not sure will happen. I just hope that FIX don't try to claim any victory. We have already seen that you can't take SA, and were desperate for a NAP, but now seem to be all for war now every man and his dog is against SA.
Erm, fisho - FIX were fighting against 3 times their number - against SA I think it was fairly equal, against SA and friends they certainly did lose some ground - now the boot is on the other foot, and suddenly it's "different"?
Just doesn't compute with me.
Dianabolic, cut the crap. FIX alliance had higher numbers than SA. FIX trial corps (doing more fighting than their full members) has surely the same numbers as HF were sending. TRIAD corps (though only on rare occations in Q) can easily be compared to the KAOS pilots who were there for 1 1/2 week.
FIX weren't outnumbered. Neither in total numbers, nor on the battlefield. On the contrary, 22 hours a day they outnumbered us in local in both FAT, 9CG and H74. The problem was they spent 21 of these hours at their POSes. At the same time, some of them showed great dedication; in some battle there were pilots getting new ships from station to die 3 times in one single battle. The only conclusion is that they lacked alot in leadership. Only when Major Riven (FoFF) were around did they seem to have any organisation at all.
*edit* btw, neither you nor anyone else answered my question about how your signature relates to this situation  Drink up, shoot in. Let the beating begin. Distributor of pain. Your loss becomes my gain...
|

Pehova Mindtriq
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 01:26:00 -
[79]
How hard can it be to survive in a region with npc stations in half the systems?
|

pshepherd
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 01:31:00 -
[80]
Originally by: Thorny281 to my old Allies in setenta corp; without roger and Biosourcy you have no problem giving jumping on a bandwagon and betraying do you? No of course not, All the best of STC left and joined evolution didnt they?
As far as i know, only Abriana Overlord joined EVOL, all of the other PvPers (and most of our directors) left and created a merc corp.
============== This is a sig |

HellsRazor
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 01:32:00 -
[81]
Originally by: dalman Edited by: dalman on 05/02/2006 01:28:56
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: fisho Should SA die, of which i am not sure will happen. I just hope that FIX don't try to claim any victory. We have already seen that you can't take SA, and were desperate for a NAP, but now seem to be all for war now every man and his dog is against SA.
Erm, fisho - FIX were fighting against 3 times their number - against SA I think it was fairly equal, against SA and friends they certainly did lose some ground - now the boot is on the other foot, and suddenly it's "different"?
Just doesn't compute with me.
Dianabolic, cut the crap. FIX alliance had higher numbers than SA. FIX trial corps (doing more fighting than their full members) has surely the same numbers as HF were sending. TRIAD corps (though only on rare occations in Q) can easily be compared to the KAOS pilots who were there for 1 1/2 week.
FIX weren't outnumbered. Neither in total numbers, nor on the battlefield. On the contrary, 22 hours a day they outnumbered us in local in both FAT, 9CG and H74. The problem was they spent 21 of these hours at their POSes. At the same time, some of them showed great dedication; in some battle there were pilots getting new ships from station to die 3 times in one single battle. The only conclusion is that they lacked alot in leadership. Only when Major Riven (FoFF) were around did they seem to have any organisation at all.
*edit* btw, neither you nor anyone else answered my question about how your signature relates to this situation 
QFT SA will always be in EVE...its that simple :) www.interexodus.com/killboardSA and for IEEX boards www.interexodus.com
|

Nightreign
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 01:41:00 -
[82]
Nima Nima Nima
Game on We atleast have honor and keep our word. Not leave your home come fight for us then when things get bad with G/IRON your on your own.
Tribal Souls 4tw
|

DjDangle
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 01:54:00 -
[83]
Originally by: Eshtir Stay on topic and no politics please.
-Eshtir
No politics? Are you watching the wrong thread?
Anyway, great post, good luck o/
"On My Signal, Unleash Hell" |

Grimpak
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 02:00:00 -
[84]
Edited by: Grimpak on 05/02/2006 02:02:04
Originally by: Justus Imperius Edited by: Justus Imperius on 04/02/2006 21:31:02 With all due respect
With 4 alliances all set + standinsg to each other.
ASCN / Huzzah / Tribal Souls all set u to - standing and closed space to u, You have no hope of winning, lets not forget MC aswell.
I commend you for your words and i wish you the best of luck. But no matter how Valiant or brave SA are, You will fail.
Again with all due respect. For you deserve respect, but with 5 alliances all over your space. You have two choices, surrender, or be annhliated.
Good luck
My thoughts only
Originally by: Susie Dutra ASCN is allready involved. They have been camping/chasing poor SA industrialists all over Esoteria. Doesn't that count?
Give them hell TRIGGER. 
Originally by: Steel Rat ASCN Official Statement
Stability in the south has always been our goal. Working with our neighbors to make a strong south has been our priority. SA feels the need to stir the pot, first with FIX and now BoB. Because of these actions, ASCN space is now closed to SA and all allies of SA, this includes the regions of Impass, Feyth. and Esoteria.
If SA would like to take this to the next level with ASCN, you know where to find us.
SA doesn't own anything in Esoteria. They come thru our part of Esoteria, we kill them. Not Blue KOS policy is enforced in ASCN space, INCLUDED Esoteria.
That said SA is neutral to us, thus we only kill them if they enter in our space (or if they pop up in the north but that's a diferent issue alltogether ). Now stop stirring the pot and ***** the forums a bit more for facts.
And Justus Imperius, we didn't set SA to negative, we setted them to neutral. ----------------
Originally by: Abdalion Shoot him ingame if you don't like this person. If you do like him, go mine veldspar with him.
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 02:01:00 -
[85]
Originally by: dalman Dianabolic, cut the crap. FIX alliance had higher numbers than SA. FIX trial corps (doing more fighting than their full members) has surely the same numbers as HF were sending. TRIAD corps (though only on rare occations in Q) can easily be compared to the KAOS pilots who were there for 1 1/2 week.
tbh, if that's the case (I didn't think it was, btw) then fair point; but I only make that comment from what the "facts" as they are available to me - if you say the numbers are equal I'm willing to accept that - but up to now no one has said or proved it any different.
Originally by: dalman ...in some battle there were pilots getting new ships from station to die 3 times in one single battle.
I've experienced that, it's admirable and really fuggin annoying at the same time.
Originally by: dalman *edit* btw, neither you nor anyone else answered my question about how your signature relates to this situation 
heh, the sig was around before this particular situation arose, though I've had a couple of interesting convo's from pilots on both sides about it - tbh I should probably remove it, as it justifies the position of BOTH sides, but hey - thanks to virtuality ;)
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Sceartan
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 02:17:00 -
[86]
Numbers numbers number..
In every single fight I fought against FIX, we were out numbered at least 1.5:1 and in the last stand for FAT it was easy 2:1 in BS alone. So regardless of the total number of players on both sides, on the battle field FIX "brought it" and they have much respect from myself.
|

laotse
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 02:53:00 -
[87]
hello all for the peep,s that forgot he this is still a game omg you are all full of anger please be civel
|

Dungar Loghoth
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 02:56:00 -
[88]
Tribal Soul's reason for war was one of the lamest I've ever seen. I hope all of their future allies take note of how they treat their "friends".
SA was strong when I was with them, and they've only grown stronger with IE-EX in charge. I wish you guys the best of luck.
|

Uggs386
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 03:25:00 -
[89]
it would be interesting to see if anyone had balls and joined sa's side in this war, so far everyone has just backed down and jumped on the bandwagon, kinda sad for thsoe southern alliances who have jumped on the bandwagon instead of trying to fight alongside long time allies. I hope someone shows some balls and fights along side sa.
Removed, inappropriate signature image - zhuge |

Uggs386
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 03:25:00 -
[90]
it would be interesting to see if anyone had balls and joined sa's side in this war, so far everyone has just backed down and jumped on the bandwagon, kinda sad for thsoe southern alliances who have jumped on the bandwagon instead of trying to fight alongside long time allies. I hope someone shows some balls and fights along side sa.
Removed, inappropriate signature image - zhuge |

Nightreign
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 03:37:00 -
[91]
I keep hearing something about a bandwagon and jumping on it. FYI we didnt jump on anybody's wagon we made a decision based on the best for Tribal Souls.
You are miss informed
|

Sylic
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 04:02:00 -
[92]
Lame reason I do not remember giving the full reason for us making the choice that we did but you are welcome to keep asuming god knows what . In the mean time we at TRIBAL will get a good laugh and do what needs to be done. But as far as friends ? that is another assumption being made. We will not ever be defeated totally and although you will not openly ask for help TRIGGER is because you know you wont have to .. But in your darkest hour you will learn who in you alliance and outside your alliance are your friends. Hence is why TRIBAL was formed. When the need was there WE was there to fight .. We trust one another to be there to fight and push forward .That is what makes an alliance IMO .. SO we are not concerned nor want nor will ask for any talks with you so do not asume we will ask EVER !!
GAME ON TIME TO FIGHT !!
Now back to the game i hate forums..
|

Oisin
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 04:03:00 -
[93]
Seriously. With someone as clear and level headed as Sceartan available, why does SA let Orc A and Trigger do any talking?
|

Krenshaw
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 04:05:00 -
[94]
Edited by: Krenshaw on 05/02/2006 04:19:30
Originally by: Snake Jankins Edited by: Snake Jankins on 04/02/2006 23:41:37 Good luck Stain. Somehow I'd like to see that SA is able to win this, winning = able to defend and keep their territory. Would be a great accomplishment against such a force. But I'm a bit afraid of your egos after that. 
No need to defend our territory. If anyone thinks this is the first time aggressors have occupied Stain proper they are nubs. I can count at least two other times. We will fight until you all get bored and go home then we will come back and reoccupy the space which Sansha's Nation ownes and maintains for us.
By the way I was sorry to see Ashido painted red on my overview in DSS....much props to you and everything will eventually come full circle as all senior pilots know it does.
What for centuries raised man above the beast is not the cudgel but the irresistible power of unarmed truth...B. Pasternak |

Angelus X
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 04:17:00 -
[95]
Originally by: Krenshaw, Stain- Alliance
No need to defend our territory. If anyone thinks this is the first time aggressors have occupied Stain proper they are nubs. I can count at least two other times. We will fight until you all get bored and go home then we will come back and reoccupy the space which Sansha's Nation ownes and maintains for us.
I did have some respect for your alliance's willingness to not be told what to do etc. etc. blah blah blah, but;
From your post above does that mean you plan to turn into the new "VC"; flying around in your inty/af/hac wcs-gangs ganking the odd afk miner once every evening? Because from previous posts I actually thought Stain Alliance were looking TO FIGHT. ---
|

Krenshaw
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 04:28:00 -
[96]
Originally by: Angelus X
Originally by: Krenshaw, Stain- Alliance
No need to defend our territory. If anyone thinks this is the first time aggressors have occupied Stain proper they are nubs. I can count at least two other times. We will fight until you all get bored and go home then we will come back and reoccupy the space which Sansha's Nation ownes and maintains for us.
I did have some respect for your alliance's willingness to not be told what to do etc. etc. blah blah blah, but;
From your post above does that mean you plan to turn into the new "VC"; flying around in your inty/af/hac wcs-gangs ganking the odd afk miner once every evening? Because from previous posts I actually thought Stain Alliance were looking TO FIGHT.
Of course we look to fight as we always have. I merely state the fact that even if aggressors manage to occupy Stain space we will simply fight until we win or thier attentions get pulled elsewhere and then destroy any remaining hostiles. Respect that is gained from the forums is seldom true or long lasting.
What for centuries raised man above the beast is not the cudgel but the irresistible power of unarmed truth...B. Pasternak |

Righteous Fury
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 04:29:00 -
[97]
Edited by: Righteous Fury on 05/02/2006 04:30:58
Originally by: Oisin Seriously. With someone as clear and level headed as Sceartan available, why does SA let Orc A and Trigger do any talking?
Ego, plain and simple. The sad part for SA is that these multiple wars could have been easily avoided by someone marginally more competent. Its hilarious (and even rather pathetic) to see most of SA now railing on about how everyone is jumping on the bandwagon against them and how its unfair. A number of SA have listed their own version of the chronology of events, but they're missing a key event. Stain sent a fleet to Delve and declared war on BoB, unprovoked. What did you think was going to happen after this, really.
IE-EX is the driving force behind Stain's problems now. Orc A has the diplomatic skills of an angry poodle - looks stupid, and irritates the crap out of everybody. You'll notice, as you look back on the four or five threads on thsi very same topic, the majority of the smacktalk from Stain comes from IE-EX pilots. Coincidence that most of the suprise Delve attack fleet was made up of IE-EX pilots? You connect the dots. Without that initial attack and diplomatic bull****, I'm sure Stain would have a LOT more support in the current conflict then they do now. I vaugely remember flying with Sceartan in the first FIX war, and from what I remember, he's a good guy. It's truly a shame that ego trumps intelligence, I doubt anyone in Eve could disagree that Sceartan would make a better diplomat than Orc A.
What it all really comes down to is that SA has a newfound warmongering streak. They chose to bite off more than they can chew, and even after being offered a way out by Molle, they chose to perpetuate hostilities.
Stain, you have nobody to blame but yourselves.
|

Adam C
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 04:33:00 -
[98]
bob; are ure victory conditions for Stain- Alliance to get their named petitioned to Stain Alliance?
to s-a; i know its a old joke now. however ffs its soo cringeworthy. so very very cringeworthy. how could you guys as an alliance not see that?
to gm's ccp; this is the oldest alliance name* ingame how could you let that typo continue?
regards to all parties.
wts: Flamingo, Recon Interceptors
|

BirdBleed
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 04:42:00 -
[99]
SA, you brought this upon yourselves. Nobody is to blame but you. You can cry on the forums all you want but it will not weaken our resolve to destroy you.
How long can you hide in your NPC stations ?
btw expect a new vid soon : a sequal to the "Where have all the good FiX gone" - "Where have ALL the SA gone" 
|

Wizie
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 04:45:00 -
[100]
Originally by: Righteous Fury Edited by: Righteous Fury on 05/02/2006 04:30:58
Originally by: Oisin Seriously. With someone as clear and level headed as Sceartan available, why does SA let Orc A and Trigger do any talking?
Ego, plain and simple. The sad part for SA is that these multiple wars could have been easily avoided by someone marginally more competent. Its hilarious (and even rather pathetic) to see most of SA now railing on about how everyone is jumping on the bandwagon against them and how its unfair. A number of SA have listed their own version of the chronology of events, but they're missing a key event. Stain sent a fleet to Delve and declared war on BoB, unprovoked. What did you think was going to happen after this, really.
IE-EX is the driving force behind Stain's problems now. Orc A has the diplomatic skills of an angry poodle - looks stupid, and irritates the crap out of everybody. You'll notice, as you look back on the four or five threads on thsi very same topic, the majority of the smacktalk from Stain comes from IE-EX pilots. Coincidence that most of the suprise Delve attack fleet was made up of IE-EX pilots? You connect the dots. Without that initial attack and diplomatic bull****, I'm sure Stain would have a LOT more support in the current conflict then they do now. I vaugely remember flying with Sceartan in the first FIX war, and from what I remember, he's a good guy. It's truly a shame that ego trumps intelligence, I doubt anyone in Eve could disagree that Sceartan would make a better diplomat than Orc A.
What it all really comes down to is that SA has a newfound warmongering streak. They chose to bite off more than they can chew, and even after being offered a way out by Molle, they chose to perpetuate hostilities.
Stain, you have nobody to blame but yourselves.
I believe IIRC that the war and fleet came after several pages of forum posts from BOB members indicating that SA were now hostile.
|

Masta Killa
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 05:08:00 -
[101]
Originally by: BirdBleed SA, you brought this upon yourselves. Nobody is to blame but you. You can cry on the forums all you want but it will not weaken our resolve to destroy you.
How long can you hide in your NPC stations ?
btw expect a new vid soon : a sequal to the "Where have all the good FiX gone" - "Where have ALL the SA gone" 
Post with your main sir.
Stupid flaming alts --------------------------------------
|

Randay
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 05:14:00 -
[102]
Originally by: Wizie I believe IIRC that the war and fleet
= hammer.
Quote: came after several pages of forum posts from BOB members indicating that SA were now hostile.
= tongue. ------------------------------------------- "Det hSr kan betyda krig!" |

Unleashed
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 05:20:00 -
[103]
Originally by: Righteous Fury Edited by: Righteous Fury on 05/02/2006 04:30:58
Originally by: Oisin Seriously. With someone as clear and level headed as Sceartan available, why does SA let Orc A and Trigger do any talking?
Ego, plain and simple. The sad part for SA is that these multiple wars could have been easily avoided by someone marginally more competent. Its hilarious (and even rather pathetic) to see most of SA now railing on about how everyone is jumping on the bandwagon against them and how its unfair. A number of SA have listed their own version of the chronology of events, but they're missing a key event. Stain sent a fleet to Delve and declared war on BoB, unprovoked. What did you think was going to happen after this, really.
IE-EX is the driving force behind Stain's problems now. Orc A has the diplomatic skills of an angry poodle - looks stupid, and irritates the crap out of everybody. You'll notice, as you look back on the four or five threads on thsi very same topic, the majority of the smacktalk from Stain comes from IE-EX pilots. Coincidence that most of the suprise Delve attack fleet was made up of IE-EX pilots? You connect the dots. Without that initial attack and diplomatic bull****, I'm sure Stain would have a LOT more support in the current conflict then they do now. I vaugely remember flying with Sceartan in the first FIX war, and from what I remember, he's a good guy. It's truly a shame that ego trumps intelligence, I doubt anyone in Eve could disagree that Sceartan would make a better diplomat than Orc A.
What it all really comes down to is that SA has a newfound warmongering streak. They chose to bite off more than they can chew, and even after being offered a way out by Molle, they chose to perpetuate hostilities.
Stain, you have nobody to blame but yourselves.
So if we hadnt send a fleet to BOB we would have had more support for what exactly? By your reasoning, there wouldnt have been a war at all. If you had a clue, there was more to it.
Its interesting to see such a vested interest you have all taken in this considering you arent fix or bob, but merely some pathetic attention troll trying to get his claim to fame on the boards.
Really, desperation to make us look bad just oozes from your posts and its quite sad. ___
>currently training to level 5: sexual tyrannosaurus / Rank 8 /
|

Revolution
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 05:25:00 -
[104]
I don't know if there would have been a war had orc-a not sent through a fleet to our space
|

Wizie
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 05:40:00 -
[105]
Originally by: Randay
Originally by: Wizie I believe IIRC that the war and fleet
= hammer.
Quote: came after several pages of forum posts from BOB members indicating that SA were now hostile.
= tongue.
All fine and dandy.
However, when it is an entity like BOB, you take what is said seriously. If it was SWA talking about setting standings to neutral, maybe SA would have laughed it off.
In this case it meant only one thing, expect to get shot at.
|

Righteous Fury
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 05:51:00 -
[106]
Edited by: Righteous Fury on 05/02/2006 05:52:09
Originally by: Unleashed
So if we hadnt send a fleet to BOB we would have had more support for what exactly? By your reasoning, there wouldnt have been a war at all. If you had a clue, there was more to it.
Its interesting to see such a vested interest you have all taken in this considering you arent fix or bob, but merely some pathetic attention troll trying to get his claim to fame on the boards.
Really, desperation to make us look bad just oozes from your posts and its quite sad.
Well considering I live in Delve and have done so for the past six months, you're quite correct in claiming that I have a vested interest in this situation. I find it amusing that you also claim I know nothing, considering you obviously don't know from what stance I make my remarks. The simple fact of the matter is, twenty four hours prior to SA's war dec on BoB, there was no plan for them to get involved militarily on either side of the war. Exuro Mortis had plans to declare war on Stain- Alliance at 20:00 on Jan 31st (nearly a week before your little diplomatic spat) to relieve boredom - the only reason our declaration immediately followed yours at 16:00 is because I was online, and figured a four hour headstart was as good as anything.
Prior to your poorly planned fleet, I had been told point blank by BoB leadership that they weren't getting involved in anything more than diplomacy. So indeed you are correct, there probably wouldn't have been a war at all. Molle is a stickler for southern stability, hence his efforts to reunite all the southern entities (HF, FIX, SA, BOB, Exuro, ASCN, TRIBE, etc) all with mutual positive standings - even after the war had started. That plan has obviously fallen through, hence the position the south is in today.
You can try to justify reasoning behind my posts all you'd like. Considering I've made perhaps four or five replies total to any of these threads, as compared to the post diarrhea from your esteemed colleagues such as USN CVN73 and Turix, I don't really need to be desperate to make you look bad. You're doing a fantastic job of that yourselves.
|

Sceartan
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 06:39:00 -
[107]
Well thanks to all the warm comments, FWIW I am an SA diplo-dude but being from Australia, I miss out on all the meaty talks that happen during Euro/US prime time.
Righteous, I remember fighting alongside you guys in A2 and down to 9CG and listening to you lay the smack down on your brother to make him get you a drink from the fridge is probably the funniest things I've heard on TS in a while 
Good luck to everyone and it's about time we had some serious fun in Eve!
|

Susie Dutra
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 07:29:00 -
[108]
Originally by: Grimpak Edited by: Grimpak on 05/02/2006 02:02:04
Originally by: Susie Dutra ASCN is allready involved. They have been camping/chasing poor SA industrialists all over Esoteria. Doesn't that count?
Give them hell TRIGGER. 
Originally by: Steel Rat ASCN Official Statement
Stability in the south has always been our goal. Working with our neighbors to make a strong south has been our priority. SA feels the need to stir the pot, first with FIX and now BoB. Because of these actions, ASCN space is now closed to SA and all allies of SA, this includes the regions of Impass, Feyth. and Esoteria.
If SA would like to take this to the next level with ASCN, you know where to find us.
SA doesn't own anything in Esoteria. They come thru our part of Esoteria, we kill them. Not Blue KOS policy is enforced in ASCN space, INCLUDED Esoteria.
That said SA is neutral to us, thus we only kill them if they enter in our space (or if they pop up in the north but that's a diferent issue alltogether ). Now stop stirring the pot and ***** the forums a bit more for facts.
And Justus Imperius, we didn't set SA to negative, we setted them to neutral.
You can set us to nuetral with "in game mecahnics" but when you camp us in stations, Its seen as hostile, not nuetral. And its not forgotten.
Keep backpeddling. |

Skelator
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 07:34:00 -
[109]
Edited by: Skelator on 05/02/2006 07:34:58
Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar Good Luck Stain.
BoB and FIX may of had their reasons for fighting u, but all others who are hopping on the bandwagon ought to be ashamed of themselves.
Bravo Sir .. Well spoken and True! Hats off to you for your Respect to Trigger and Company. I think after being around for almost from start of game they DESERVE ALOT of Respect. Not to mention that anyone who thinks SA is going to fold like a house of cards has a Very rude Awakening 
They have us Surrounded again.. the Poor Bastards |

Skelator
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 07:43:00 -
[110]
Originally by: Seldarine I was in Curse Alliance for pretty much the entire time it was alive, and that entire time we fought SA most of the time outnumbering them and occupying their space.
SA still stood strong then and they still stand strong now. The force that was CA in its prime make the entire forces that are laying seige to Stain now look like a dissorganised alt corp in comparison.
This recent conflict will not bring SA to its knees but will only strengthen its resolve. I laugh at the ppl in this thread who cannot see this.
      
/Emote Agree's
They have us Surrounded again.. the Poor Bastards |

Unleashed
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 07:52:00 -
[111]
Lets see, so living in Delve does that make you afraid of people coming to your home and shooting you? As we never had any beef with anyone in Delve, just Fix. Or are you a 'stickler for southern stability' as well?
The first thing you said when Orc A made his topic about war resuming with Fix was:
Quote: What did you think was going to happen when you pushed it too far? BoB were just going to sit back and let you roll into Querious uncontested?s
Yes, we did think so actually..
And now you are saying:
Quote: there was no plan for them to get involved militarily on either side of the war
Right.
Then:
Quote:
I think SA have singlehandedly proved to be the most idiotic alliance in Eve. Seriously, you got hostile with FIX for whatever reason and brought in Huzzah and Kaos.
So, lets say I believe you(which I dont but lets just assume so) when you said you were going to declare war on us to relieve boredom. You would get hostile with us for even though Molle wanted stability with all southern entities(and prior to us declaring, wasnt considering using military force at all)? Surely if Bob were only going to go through diplomacy why would you guys want to further confuse things? 
You are just trying to run along with the big boys. I bet you never would have declared if we werent at war with Bob.
It was never about 'stability', second time this has happened and just like before Bob stepped in when Fix' home turf was going to be taken over. If Bob was truly concerned about southern stability they would have intervened the moment fix set us to neutral. ___
>currently training to level 5: sexual tyrannosaurus / Rank 8 /
|

TornSoul
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 08:11:00 -
[112]
Edited by: TornSoul on 05/02/2006 08:11:47
Originally by: Unleashed
It was never about 'stability', second time this has happened and just like before Bob stepped in when Fix' home turf was going to be taken over. If Bob was truly concerned about southern stability they would have intervened the moment fix set us to neutral.
I think you just hit the proverbial nail on the head 
BIG Lottery
[u |

Seleene
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 08:19:00 -
[113]
The politics of all this matter not at all to us. However, I did want to comment on this:
Originally by: Righteous Fury A number of SA have listed their own version of the chronology of events, but they're missing a key event. Stain sent a fleet to Delve and declared war on BoB, unprovoked. What did you think was going to happen after this, really.
Our involvement in this affair pre-dated the above events by days. We are on contract. We are in no one's pocket and we ganked the bandwagon. Clear? The MC will do our job and move on. How long the job will last remains to be seen.
-
See the MC in action in our latest vid! |

dfhsfghf
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 08:31:00 -
[114]
You can't have your cake and eat it too. |

Orc A
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 08:56:00 -
[115]
Edited by: Orc A on 05/02/2006 08:56:38
Quote: Stain sent a fleet to Delve and declared war on BoB, unprovoked.
Just because you aren't aware of the "provoking" doesnt mean it never happened. You are not an eve-global information hub. stfu and mind your buisness plz.
kthnxbye.
|

Randay
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 09:54:00 -
[116]
TBH, if bob had stepped in super early(when fix set sa to neutral) then fix really would be bobs slave, or in the opposite case, fix would have probably been very offended. Like when two of your friends start arguing over something stupid, do you really just jump in there like youre thier mom? or do you give them a chance to work things out. If the arguement turns into a fist fight, you jump in there and try to stop it, how do you do that? You pull the bigger guy off the smaller one. What if one of them takes a swing at you? Well... ------------------------------------------- "Det hSr kan betyda krig!" |

Fi T'Zeh
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 10:07:00 -
[117]
Originally by: Randay TBH, if bob had stepped in super early(when fix set sa to neutral) then fix really would be bobs slave, or in the opposite case, fix would have probably been very offended. Like when two of your friends start arguing over something stupid, do you really just jump in there like youre thier mom? or do you give them a chance to work things out. If the arguement turns into a fist fight, you jump in there and try to stop it, how do you do that? You pull the bigger guy off the smaller one. What if one of them takes a swing at you? Well...
What he said tbh.
I doubt there are many people in BoB that actually "wanted" to be engaged in this particular conflict. Certainly RKK would rather be mining veldspar in empire, but do not for one minute confuse us not wanting to start down this course, with an unwillingness to see it to a satisfactory conclusion now we are on it. ....
|

Qinoly
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 10:07:00 -
[118]
Originally by: dfhsfghf You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Hey look a macro'er that talks 
|

Grimpak
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 10:25:00 -
[119]
Edited by: Grimpak on 05/02/2006 10:25:36
Originally by: Susie Dutra
Originally by: Grimpak Edited by: Grimpak on 05/02/2006 02:02:04
Originally by: Susie Dutra ASCN is allready involved. They have been camping/chasing poor SA industrialists all over Esoteria. Doesn't that count?
Give them hell TRIGGER. 
Originally by: Steel Rat ASCN Official Statement
Stability in the south has always been our goal. Working with our neighbors to make a strong south has been our priority. SA feels the need to stir the pot, first with FIX and now BoB. Because of these actions, ASCN space is now closed to SA and all allies of SA, this includes the regions of Impass, Feyth. and Esoteria.
If SA would like to take this to the next level with ASCN, you know where to find us.
SA doesn't own anything in Esoteria. They come thru our part of Esoteria, we kill them. Not Blue KOS policy is enforced in ASCN space, INCLUDED Esoteria.
That said SA is neutral to us, thus we only kill them if they enter in our space (or if they pop up in the north but that's a diferent issue alltogether ). Now stop stirring the pot and ***** the forums a bit more for facts.
And Justus Imperius, we didn't set SA to negative, we setted them to neutral.
You can set us to nuetral with "in game mecahnics" but when you camp us in stations, Its seen as hostile, not nuetral. And its not forgotten.
Keep backpeddling.
You come thru out regions, expect to be shot at. Invaders are pusrued to the last consequences.
edit: last post from me on this thread. Don't expect a reply from me. ----------------
Originally by: Abdalion Shoot him ingame if you don't like this person. If you do like him, go mine veldspar with him.
|

Armanoob
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 10:50:00 -
[120]
Originally by: dfhsfghf You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Never ever figured out what this meant. I mean, why have a cake if you can't eat it? |

Aegieal
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 10:54:00 -
[121]
you have bob, fix, exuro, tribe, MC, and BA all out to kill you and a few other southern alliences closing space to you. I think you haev a problem SA, and i think you vastly underestimate what is going on. ride your high-horse though, right into your own destruction.
|

Troubadour
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 10:55:00 -
[122]
Edited by: Troubadour on 05/02/2006 10:56:08
Originally by: Angelus X
Originally by: Krenshaw, Stain- Alliance
No need to defend our territory. If anyone thinks this is the first time aggressors have occupied Stain proper they are nubs. I can count at least two other times. We will fight until you all get bored and go home then we will come back and reoccupy the space which Sansha's Nation ownes and maintains for us.
I did have some respect for your alliance's willingness to not be told what to do etc. etc. blah blah blah, but;
From your post above does that mean you plan to turn into the new "VC"; flying around in your inty/af/hac wcs-gangs ganking the odd afk miner once every evening? Because from previous posts I actually thought Stain Alliance were looking TO FIGHT.
If by fight you mean sit on the station with an 8 man BS fleet because an inty fleet came into local then yes they are out to fight.
|

Riddlock
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 11:01:00 -
[123]
Now, everybody from FIX , BOB , EXORU , TRIBE , ASCN are wrong and SA is right ...
Second , for all of you who keep run your mouth about how TRIBE betrayed SA in the G/IRON war , get a clue , i have failed yet to see most of you who flame us beeing in a gang defend SA space .
|

Zubenelgenubi
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 11:04:00 -
[124]
/me flames TS
/me has been in plenty of gangs defending SA space.
 
|

Trembler
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 11:13:00 -
[125]
Trigger, thebold and dalilah all have my respect for their posts.
 __ Trembler kurit.
|

Sceartan
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 11:23:00 -
[126]
Originally by: Riddlock Now, everybody from FIX , BOB , EXORU , TRIBE , ASCN are wrong and SA is right ...
Second , for all of you who keep run your mouth about how TRIBE betrayed SA in the G/IRON war , get a clue , i have failed yet to see most of you who flame us beeing in a gang defend SA space .
I'm also confused as to how Tribal betrayed Stain during the G/IRON war, considering Tribal wasn't created and we still all flew under the same alliance name. But as for the end of the war at that time, the terms although surprising, were within reason and were accepted on behalf of SA. So no-one betrayed anyone, before now.
|

Riddlock
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 11:27:00 -
[127]
Originally by: Sceartan
Originally by: Riddlock Now, everybody from FIX , BOB , EXORU , TRIBE , ASCN are wrong and SA is right ...
Second , for all of you who keep run your mouth about how TRIBE betrayed SA in the G/IRON war , get a clue , i have failed yet to see most of you who flame us beeing in a gang defend SA space .
I'm also confused as to how Tribal betrayed Stain during the G/IRON war, considering Tribal wasn't created and we still all flew under the same alliance name. But as for the end of the war at that time, the terms although surprising, were within reason and were accepted on behalf of SA. So no-one betrayed anyone, before now.
Yea sceartan maybe some of the SA have a clue about what happend there, maybe the bold <3 will let you know guys what really happend at that time. I can only speak for myself now , with every single SA beeing crocky about tribe and about how much of a miners we are and how much we suk roids and how much we betrayed SA in the G / IRON war never helped to get a really friendly relationship .
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 11:30:00 -
[128]
Originally by: Orc A
Quote: Stain sent a fleet to Delve and declared war on BoB, unprovoked.
Just because you aren't aware of the "provoking" doesnt mean it never happened. You are not an eve-global information hub. stfu and mind your buisness plz.
There was no provocation, Orc A, you asked us to speak with you because you had new information - so we attended your teamspeak to hear you out - this "new" information wasn't information at all, it was your altered and trumped up "surrender" terms and insistence that without them you would no stop fighting FIX - terms that your allies, HUZZAH, immediately seperated themselves from.
I personally clarified all of this information with you and, having discovered there was nothing "new" we left your teamspeak without a word.
You then came to delve within 24 hours and declared war on us.
So, please, if that is provocation then it is no surprise we are in the situation we are in.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Macsine
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 11:30:00 -
[129]
Originally by: TRIGGER Today talks ceased . I openly state that from today I will not re-enter talks with either FIX nor will I talk to Tribal Souls alliance today or at any point in the future . Both said alliances will remain enemies until such time are defeated totally .
Source: http://myeve.eve-online.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1051&tid=7 reported by Yelena Haurvatha | 2006.01.15 12:01:53
Quote: Whilst the border incidents and the tactical weight of the region played an important part in deteriorating relations between both parties, Pebbledasher thinks that the Stain- Alliance "covets FIX territory", going even further to say that, "their avarice has lead ... to initiate, what in their minds always was, an acquisitive conflict." This allegation is not completely refuted by Orc A, who justifies their action: "It's time for more cooperative members to reside in Querious", with the long term objective being the complete termination of the Firmus Ixion alliance.
I think you are 2 weeks behind. Any other news ?
|

Troubadour
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 11:39:00 -
[130]
Originally by: Zubenelgenubi /me flames TS
/me has been in plenty of gangs defending SA space.
 
they must of been invisable gangs
|

Rutoo
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 11:42:00 -
[131]
There where many reasons for the first SA Braking into TRIBE and PRIME,
One was the lack of support when G came down, STC did bring up people from paragon often, While the northern parts of stain didn't. When we did get alot of people together, from what i was told bad Management of the fleet was the doom,
There was no Hard Feelings when SA Split, they knew the reasons and they where still consindered friends.
The Real Reason why tribe decided to backstab, and join the bandwaggon is unknown. becuase TRIBE doesn't at all use the Stain Route, Mostly though BoB Space, to A2-. TRIBE leadership wasn't looking after thier Allience, they where looking after what BOB was doing, they have no reason for going up to SA space,
Mind you TRIBE is alot different from when it first formed, After Aberina Overlord left, or even before that, there was internal issues and bickering, but thats nothing to get into, but it gives an idea on why all the main STC folks left to create a new corp.
But now the TRIBE leadership are a bunch of stuck up b*, and i hope Paragon is cleansed of these people,
I wish SA the best of luck during these times.
|

Cmd Woodlouse
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 11:44:00 -
[132]
Originally by: Troubadour Edited by: Troubadour on 05/02/2006 10:56:08
Originally by: Angelus X
Originally by: Krenshaw, Stain- Alliance
No need to defend our territory. If anyone thinks this is the first time aggressors have occupied Stain proper they are nubs. I can count at least two other times. We will fight until you all get bored and go home then we will come back and reoccupy the space which Sansha's Nation ownes and maintains for us.
I did have some respect for your alliance's willingness to not be told what to do etc. etc. blah blah blah, but;
From your post above does that mean you plan to turn into the new "VC"; flying around in your inty/af/hac wcs-gangs ganking the odd afk miner once every evening? Because from previous posts I actually thought Stain Alliance were looking TO FIGHT.
If by fight you mean sit on the station with an 8 man BS fleet because an inty fleet came into local then yes they are out to fight.
"Fighting" an inty fleet in BS only would be stupid if they dont have the appropriate fitting at hand. The BS would get slaughtered.
-G- Pink Power
Darko1107 > i'd rather be fat tbh :P |

Elendar
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 11:55:00 -
[133]
Originally by: Sceartan
I'm also confused as to how Tribal betrayed Stain during the G/IRON war, considering Tribal wasn't created and we still all flew under the same alliance name. But as for the end of the war at that time, the terms although surprising, were within reason and were accepted on behalf of SA. So no-one betrayed anyone, before now.
Sanity ;o, why is this man not in diplomacy rather than orc attack, that fleet is probably the reason ascn and tribal now have you netural/kos. Stain look like they attacked a more powerful entity for no real reason, hardly a thing to encourage support from your neighbours. First fix set you to neutral so you invade Next bob, who live 2 regions away, set you to neutral and you try and invade. Look at us friends, we're good for stability, help us!
|

BOldMan
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 15:04:00 -
[134]
Originally by: Elendar
First fix set you to neutral so you invade Next bob, who live 2 regions away, set you to neutral and you try and invade.
Hmm, will be the empire next?
Originally by: Treacle Shazboat Trying to buy from the market. The buy window is blank. Try to send a petition dropped me to the desktop.
|

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 15:14:00 -
[135]
Originally by: Riddlock
Originally by: Sceartan
Originally by: Riddlock Now, everybody from FIX , BOB , EXORU , TRIBE , ASCN are wrong and SA is right ...
Second , for all of you who keep run your mouth about how TRIBE betrayed SA in the G/IRON war , get a clue , i have failed yet to see most of you who flame us beeing in a gang defend SA space .
I'm also confused as to how Tribal betrayed Stain during the G/IRON war, considering Tribal wasn't created and we still all flew under the same alliance name. But as for the end of the war at that time, the terms although surprising, were within reason and were accepted on behalf of SA. So no-one betrayed anyone, before now.
Yea sceartan maybe some of the SA have a clue about what happend there, maybe the bold <3 will let you know guys what really happend at that time. I can only speak for myself now , with every single SA beeing crocky about tribe and about how much of a miners we are and how much we suk roids and how much we betrayed SA in the G / IRON war never helped to get a really friendly relationship .
I allways wanted to ask didnt TS make BSs for SE while they were in SA as part of an agreement to pass 4gq unharmed? This has been confirmed in various convos i had with friends i had in SE atm. Dont talk about betrayal to us or about defending SA space. Stain proper has been a buffer zone for ppl living in ur part of space since CA wars. U were our brothers n u would have continue to be so even if u just stayed neutral in this thing, but i guess thats not the way u viewed things. Im not happy with fighting old friends, but at least now we know who our friends really are. If u are refering to bold not accepting help from other alliances during the war with G, u need to know all the facts that made him make that decision. And since u mentioned it compare it to the current situation.
So Far So Good....So What |

Troubadour
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 15:15:00 -
[136]
Edited by: Troubadour on 05/02/2006 15:15:42
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse
Originally by: Troubadour Edited by: Troubadour on 05/02/2006 10:56:08
Originally by: Angelus X
Originally by: Krenshaw, Stain- Alliance
No need to defend our territory. If anyone thinks this is the first time aggressors have occupied Stain proper they are nubs. I can count at least two other times. We will fight until you all get bored and go home then we will come back and reoccupy the space which Sansha's Nation ownes and maintains for us.
I did have some respect for your alliance's willingness to not be told what to do etc. etc. blah blah blah, but;
we had 12, they had 8 BS. we've raped 15 man inty fleets with 5 BS before fitted with frig guns. suicide my a$$ From your post above does that mean you plan to turn into the new "VC"; flying around in your inty/af/hac wcs-gangs ganking the odd afk miner once every evening? Because from previous posts I actually thought Stain Alliance were looking TO FIGHT.
If by fight you mean sit on the station with an 8 man BS fleet because an inty fleet came into local then yes they are out to fight.
"Fighting" an inty fleet in BS only would be stupid if they dont have the appropriate fitting at hand. The BS would get slaughtered.
we had 12, they had 8 bs. we've raped 15man inty gangs with 5 bs before. suicide, i think not.
|

Righteous Fury
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 15:23:00 -
[137]
Edited by: Righteous Fury on 05/02/2006 15:24:23
Originally by: Unleashed Then:
Quote:
I think SA have singlehandedly proved to be the most idiotic alliance in Eve. Seriously, you got hostile with FIX for whatever reason and brought in Huzzah and Kaos.
So, lets say I believe you(which I dont but lets just assume so) when you said you were going to declare war on us to relieve boredom. You would get hostile with us for even though Molle wanted stability with all southern entities(and prior to us declaring, wasnt considering using military force at all)? Surely if Bob were only going to go through diplomacy why would you guys want to further confuse things? 
You are just trying to run along with the big boys. I bet you never would have declared if we werent at war with Bob.
It was never about 'stability', second time this has happened and just like before Bob stepped in when Fix' home turf was going to be taken over. If Bob was truly concerned about southern stability they would have intervened the moment fix set us to neutral.
Congratulations, you've looked at my post history. In your insight, you seemed to have missed my reply to dalman that explained the situation between Exuro and BoB, and between Exuro and Stain.
Now, take a look at my avatar. Do you see the bold text under it? It says "Exuro Mortis". There's your first clue that I'm not BoB, and therefore am not bound by what they do. If I were a BoB pet, surely there would have been BoB intervention several months ago when SA began firing on us after 6+ months of positive standings.
I find it amusing that you think we're just tagging along and can't do anything for ourselves - especially in light that you don't even know anything about us. Thinking we don't have the balls to declare on Stain is just laughable - ask FIX about our war with them, or any war in between. I could give you in-game chat logs (in particular, the log between me and Farsenir setting aside a years worth of hostility between FIX and Exuro), IRC conversations, and TS recordings of the past week with snippets of our preperation for the war dec - but you know, I really don't care that you think. You obviously know nothing, and instead of doing your homework, you spout off at the mouth like 90% of the other pilots in SA.
As for southern stability, SA have no right to speak about how anyone else should have intervened or how it should have been done. Is BoB is your mother? DO I need to mention the number of times in the past six months that SA has been the single cause of destabilization?
Off the top of my head: a) Coalition declares war on FIX, takes Catch b) TRIGGER and MASS attempt to usurp authority from Stain Empire, form the legendary STAIN ALLAINCE, and break apart the second largest alliance in eve at the time. c) SA starts another war with FIX
In that same time period, the only other southern entity to attack another was Red Alliance. Next time, when you use the words "southern stability," remind yourself that Stain has been the only variable factor in the southwest for some time now.
|

dalman
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 15:39:00 -
[138]
Originally by: Righteous Fury As for southern stability, SA have no right to speak about how anyone else should have intervened or how it should have been done. Is BoB is your mother? DO I need to mention the number of times in the past six months that SA has been the single cause of destabilization?
Off the top of my head: a) Coalition declares war on FIX, takes Catch b) TRIGGER and MASS attempt to usurp authority from Stain Empire, form the legendary STAIN ALLAINCE, and break apart the second largest alliance in eve at the time. c) SA starts another war with FIX
Heh, that wasn't many rights in that.
a.) The other way. Catch has always 'been stain'. It was FIX that all of a sudden launched a surprise attack to fight an expansion war to take Catch. They were pushed back, and as the fight was taken into Querious instead BoB intervened, just like this time.
b.) What you don't know is that it was always made clear that MASS leaving stain was just temporary. Hence, there was a very clear text written about this on the SE forums, stating the full authorities (and indeed, it was also written that the executor would not have the title emperor in Trigger's absence). What happened was that SE members refused to recognise the rules for this that had been made. As such you are completely wrong in your assumptions, again.
c.) When FIX sets SA to KOS standing and refuse to do any diplomatic talks about it, and start shooting on us, I find it hard to see how we started the war.
Drink up, shoot in. Let the beating begin. Distributor of pain. Your loss becomes my gain...
|

Righteous Fury
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 15:51:00 -
[139]
Edited by: Righteous Fury on 05/02/2006 15:55:06 dalman, you've missed the point. I wasn't assuming anything, as you've noticed each point there was a fact (more or less), forgive me if I didn't divulge into a three page essay of the story behind each incident. I may have got SAvFIX II backwards, whatever. MASS was going to come back, sure, but Cujo's refusal to relinquish power lead to the hostilities. Semantics, get over it.
The point I was making is that numerous times in the past six months, SA have been a destabilizing force in the south - a track record that overshadows anyone else. For SA to harp on about stability is really just hypocritical and silly.
I'm no huge fan of FIX either, as I'm sure many of them remember. When SA decided they were going to invade Querious, it directly affected Tribal Souls, BoB, and Exuro because the Agil -> A2-V27 pipe is a vital route for us. Obviously we'd prefer to have it in control of someone who can keep it reasonably stable (albeit, weaker than they once were), as opposed to someone with your track record.
|

Kantar
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 15:58:00 -
[140]
Good luck Trig and Co.
But on a personal note :
Why MC as been hired for this war as well ??
I thought the honorable thing to do is sort it out the part involve and keep the rest out of it.
Two Alliance v One and involving Merc as well is a bit low, I hope whoever hiried MC will reconsider and bring a clean fight to them.
There is a quote that come to mind reading all this :
Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself.
This are my 50 pence.
|

Eyeshadow
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 16:08:00 -
[141]
Originally by: Kantar Good luck Trig and Co.
But on a personal note :
Why MC as been hired for this war as well ??
I thought the honorable thing to do is sort it out the part involve and keep the rest out of it.
Two Alliance v One and involving Merc as well is a bit low, I hope whoever hiried MC will reconsider and bring a clean fight to them.
There is a quote that come to mind reading all this :
Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself.
This are my 50 pence.
We were hired, in part, for our large capital fleet to destroy hostile POS in FAT-6P. Yesterday we took 6 hostile Large towers into reinforced mode and have finished off 4 as of this moment. The remaining 2 will soon be taken out aswell
The empire war is always an accompaniment to one of our contracts and we rarely take a contract without an empire war as that is one of our bigger strengths.
The reasons, the whos, the whys etc are of little consequence to us and your definition of honour (i.e. fair fights) does not enter into ours. We are paid to do a job, and a job we will do. Why you consider someone hiring us for a specific job as "a bit low" is beyond me. Someone wanted something to doing. We are here to do it
Thanks
My Latest Vid (16/11/05) |

Snake Jankins
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 16:18:00 -
[142]
Originally by: Krenshaw
Originally by: Angelus X
Originally by: Krenshaw, Stain- Alliance
No need to defend our territory. If anyone thinks this is the first time aggressors have occupied Stain proper they are nubs. I can count at least two other times. We will fight until you all get bored and go home then we will come back and reoccupy the space which Sansha's Nation ownes and maintains for us.
I did have some respect for your alliance's willingness to not be told what to do etc. etc. blah blah blah, but;
From your post above does that mean you plan to turn into the new "VC"; flying around in your inty/af/hac wcs-gangs ganking the odd afk miner once every evening? Because from previous posts I actually thought Stain Alliance were looking TO FIGHT.
Of course we look to fight as we always have. I merely state the fact that even if aggressors manage to occupy Stain space we will simply fight until we win or thier attentions get pulled elsewhere and then destroy any remaining hostiles. Respect that is gained from the forums is seldom true or long lasting.
Well, yes and I understand that position. Everyone knows that you can only control npc space, if a strong force settles there. You can't just beat someone out of NPC space in a few battles and install a weaker alliance that suits you more. On the day the main force leaves, the original owners can retake control of the area. Imho nothing wrong with saying: 'We'll never stop fighting for Stain, no matter what happens.' If an area means that much to someone, why not. ___________ 'Only ships can be assembled, this is a Frigate.' |

HellsRazor
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 16:35:00 -
[143]
MC id just like to say... smack aside(those that really had chance to talk and have fun know wassup) i understand you keep it simple and have contract.. nothing on you guys at all. See you on the field and you make it fun :). again anyone offended or taken local fun to heart ,holla... ill direct to others :)
Best to all... dont take local so personal IEEX dont care and love the fun. (cant speak for other SA)
|

dalman
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 16:45:00 -
[144]
Originally by: Righteous Fury The point I was making is that numerous times in the past six months, SA have been a destabilizing force in the south - a track record that overshadows anyone else. For SA to harp on about stability is really just hypocritical and silly.
I won't deny that stain has always been in the center of the attention. However, can't that have anything to do with the fact that stain is also in the centre of the map? So no matter who does what in the south, it will involve stain...
Drink up, shoot in. Let the beating begin. Distributor of pain. Your loss becomes my gain...
|

Sylic
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 16:47:00 -
[145]
Edited by: Sylic on 05/02/2006 16:47:38 Rutoo you know nothing of what you talk about.. You do not know why we jumped in the fight.
We declared for much deeper reasons than anyone knows. So please keep making an a** of your self talking about what you know nothing of..
|

Shrike
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 16:48:00 -
[146]
Originally by: HellsRazor MC id just like to say... smack aside(those that really had chance to talk and have fun know wassup) i understand you keep it simple and have contract.. nothing on you guys at all. See you on the field and you make it fun :). again anyone offended or taken local fun to heart ,holla... ill direct to others :)
Best to all... dont take local so personal IEEX dont care and love the fun. (cant speak for other SA)
Yes, IE-EX sure does love their local.
Quote: [09:41:20] Kamikaze1 > shrike [09:41:29] Kamikaze1 > i meet u in rl dude [09:41:35] Kamikaze1 > and then .... [09:41:40] Kamikaze1 > muhahahahha [09:41:42] Shrike > And then? [09:42:10] Kamikaze1 > [09:42:17] Shrike > Im waiting, and then? [09:42:44] Kamikaze1 > na u write petitions [09:42:54] Shrike > Not at all, no petition. [09:43:06] Kamikaze1 > really [09:43:33] Kamikaze1 > muhahah [09:43:44] Shrike > Im interested as to see what kinda maturity level you actually have. [09:44:08] Kamikaze1 > u never know [09:44:41] Shrike > Was hoping this was more then teens with too many hormons. [09:44:48] Shrike > But i guess not. [09:44:48] Kamikaze1 > it is [09:45:17] Kamikaze1 > how old are u little one ? [09:45:40] Shrike > lol, take your a/sl/l elsewhere dude. [09:45:49] Kamikaze1 > o.0 [09:45:56] Kamikaze1 > u ****ed ? [09:46:02] Kamikaze1 > come on [09:46:16] Kamikaze1 > i ♥ u [09:47:26] Kamikaze1 > so u want to surrender ?
Kind of cute really.
|

HellsRazor
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 16:57:00 -
[147]
:) Shrike or Molle watevers... i dont know if you think im Kami im sure you know thats a corpie .. but yeah local for the win. we all have logs of local chat that are funny. best of luck
|

Righteous Fury
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 16:58:00 -
[148]
Originally by: HellsRazor we all have logs of local chat that are funny.
Thats not really funny. It's pathetic.
|

Naverin
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:01:00 -
[149]
Trigger want to go mine veldspar with me?  ====================================================================
I am the light in an empty hangar. I am the hope of survival. I am the Carebear |

HellsRazor
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:01:00 -
[150]
Originally by: Righteous Fury
Originally by: HellsRazor we all have logs of local chat that are funny.
Thats not really funny. It's pathetic.
huh? pathetic i have logs of enemy acting .. um not exactly honorable. i guess your one to take local fun to heart... im sorry... ill be sure to not offend you specificly in local
|

Shrike
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:03:00 -
[151]
Originally by: HellsRazor
Originally by: Righteous Fury
Originally by: HellsRazor we all have logs of local chat that are funny.
Thats not really funny. It's pathetic.
huh? pathetic i have logs of enemy acting .. um not exactly honorable. i guess your one to take local fun to heart... im sorry... ill be sure to not offend you specificly in local
You have local chats of anyone of us implying RL threats as well? Then give me and ill boot the offender in 5 secs.
|

Righteous Fury
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:06:00 -
[152]
Originally by: HellsRazor huh? pathetic i have logs of enemy acting .. um not exactly honorable. i guess your one to take local fun to heart... im sorry... ill be sure to not offend you specificly in local
There's a difference in talking smack and being amusing - for example Imperium's Dark Lord roleplay is, while annoying after a while, at least creative. Or Rohann being...well, Rohann.
Acting like a twelve year old in local is reserved for Counterstrike and World of Warcraft, and the Teletubbies' Great Adventure.
|

HellsRazor
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:09:00 -
[153]
Molle/Shrike if people are offended .. like yourself ,even tho you say in chat you can take in fun and can handle/wont petition even tho your making it obvious you really do take it personal... report it if you cant take it. Its your right to report what offends you even if you say in chat you can take it.
im not flaming at all... if anyone cant take it when i verbaly fight in local just say so.. ill leave you be.. thats it. if i fail to comply report it.
|

Rutoo
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:11:00 -
[154]
Originally by: Sylic Edited by: Sylic on 05/02/2006 16:47:38 Rutoo you know nothing of what you talk about.. You do not know why we jumped in the fight.
We declared for much deeper reasons than anyone knows. So please keep making an a** of your self talking about what you know nothing of..
What is your problem? i stood up for your corp becuase i knew you guys where doing a good job. i had no beef with you guys at all, and now you are jumping the gun..... i even eve-mailed you about it becuase i was upset aboout the internal bickering.
Or do you not remember that? I do know what i am talking about, and i problely have one of the most unbiased opnions about things then everyone else.
I did enjoy flying with you guys slyic, But Living in Paragon soul for almost a year, i wanted at least a change of scene, and STC wasn't providing me what i needed to expand and grow.
I think i detailed that in my eve-mail to you also. And please if need be contact me ingame about anymore questions
|

Shrike
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:12:00 -
[155]
Originally by: HellsRazor Molle/Shrike if people are offended .. like yourself ,even tho you say in chat you can take in fun and can handle/wont petition even tho your making it obvious you really do take it personal... report it if you cant take it. Its your right to report what offends you even if you say in chat you can take it.
im not flaming at all... if anyone cant take it when i verbaly fight in local just say so.. ill leave you be.. thats it. if i fail to comply report it.
Quite true, i will not petition it, i will name and shame instead. Works way better.
Offended? Not one bit. Dream on. Pathetic? Yes.
|

ElCoCo
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:12:00 -
[156]
asl?  |

HellsRazor
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:20:00 -
[157]
Molle thats fine... whatever you want to take serious... but i know others enjoy and are happy to jest back and forth.
|

MrTriggerHappy
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:37:00 -
[158]
Originally by: HellsRazor Molle thats fine... whatever you want to take serious... but i know others enjoy and are happy to jest back and forth.
Nothing like a good ol' bit of 'banter' in the local channel 
|

Mitch Taylor
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:40:00 -
[159]
Originally by: Rutoo There where many reasons for the first SA Braking into TRIBE and PRIME,
One was the lack of support when G came down, STC did bring up people from paragon often, While the northern parts of stain didn't. When we did get alot of people together, from what i was told bad Management of the fleet was the doom,
There was no Hard Feelings when SA Split, they knew the reasons and they where still consindered friends.
The Real Reason why tribe decided to backstab, and join the bandwaggon is unknown. becuase TRIBE doesn't at all use the Stain Route, Mostly though BoB Space, to A2-. TRIBE leadership wasn't looking after thier Allience, they where looking after what BOB was doing, they have no reason for going up to SA space,
Mind you TRIBE is alot different from when it first formed, After Aberina Overlord left, or even before that, there was internal issues and bickering, but thats nothing to get into, but it gives an idea on why all the main STC folks left to create a new corp.
But now the TRIBE leadership are a bunch of stuck up b*, and i hope Paragon is cleansed of these people,
I wish SA the best of luck during these times.
This is not the opinion of Dark Rising.
*click*
|

Ku'Gras
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:45:00 -
[160]
Originally by: Shrike
Originally by: HellsRazor MC id just like to say... smack aside(those that really had chance to talk and have fun know wassup) i understand you keep it simple and have contract.. nothing on you guys at all. See you on the field and you make it fun :). again anyone offended or taken local fun to heart ,holla... ill direct to others :)
Best to all... dont take local so personal IEEX dont care and love the fun. (cant speak for other SA)
Yes, IE-EX sure does love their local.
Quote: [09:41:20] Kamikaze1 > shrike [09:41:29] Kamikaze1 > i meet u in rl dude [09:41:35] Kamikaze1 > and then .... [09:41:40] Kamikaze1 > muhahahahha [09:41:42] Shrike > And then? [09:42:10] Kamikaze1 > [09:42:17] Shrike > Im waiting, and then? [09:42:44] Kamikaze1 > na u write petitions [09:42:54] Shrike > Not at all, no petition. [09:43:06] Kamikaze1 > really [09:43:33] Kamikaze1 > muhahah [09:43:44] Shrike > Im interested as to see what kinda maturity level you actually have. [09:44:08] Kamikaze1 > u never know [09:44:41] Shrike > Was hoping this was more then teens with too many hormons. [09:44:48] Shrike > But i guess not. [09:44:48] Kamikaze1 > it is [09:45:17] Kamikaze1 > how old are u little one ? [09:45:40] Shrike > lol, take your a/sl/l elsewhere dude. [09:45:49] Kamikaze1 > o.0 [09:45:56] Kamikaze1 > u ****ed ? [09:46:02] Kamikaze1 > come on [09:46:16] Kamikaze1 > i ♥ u [09:47:26] Kamikaze1 > so u want to surrender ?
Kind of cute really.
Brave enough to smack local with real life threats but afraid of a petition in an online virtual game? Fearsome guy.
|

j0sephine
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 17:54:00 -
[161]
"Molle thats fine... whatever you want to take serious... but i know others enjoy and are happy to jest back and forth."
There's a difference between 'jest back and forth' and bringing RL into it. If you can't even see it... that itself tells all that need to be said, really.
|

Halseth Durn
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 18:04:00 -
[162]
Originally by: HellsRazor Molle thats fine... whatever you want to take serious... but i know others enjoy and are happy to jest back and forth.
Wrong. A little fun in local is one thing. Hinting that you may be the recipient of a snipers bullet or some piano wire is completely out of the realm of acceptable.
I'd be emberassed to be in an alliance with anyone that thinks RL death threats are FUN in a f-ing computer game.
Shame-game FTW.
Hal
|

Eyeshadow
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 19:06:00 -
[163]
Originally by: MrTriggerHappy Nothing like a good ol' bit of 'banter' in the local channel 
Very true, a bit of friendly banter in local chat is often appreciated
However, your local talk is just trash. Posting killmails and the like is lame and extremely childish. Grow up
My Latest Vid (16/11/05) |

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 19:25:00 -
[164]
Originally by: Shrike
Originally by: HellsRazor Molle/Shrike if people are offended .. like yourself ,even tho you say in chat you can take in fun and can handle/wont petition even tho your making it obvious you really do take it personal... report it if you cant take it. Its your right to report what offends you even if you say in chat you can take it.
im not flaming at all... if anyone cant take it when i verbaly fight in local just say so.. ill leave you be.. thats it. if i fail to comply report it.
Quite true, i will not petition it, i will name and shame instead. Works way better.
Offended? Not one bit. Dream on. Pathetic? Yes.
I ll agree with shrike on this one
So Far So Good....So What |

dantes inferno
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 19:25:00 -
[165]
Quote: However, your local talk is just trash. Posting killmails and the like is lame and extremely childish. Grow up
QFT...personaly it fills me with shame and disgust. _____
"When mothers warned their children that the monster would get them, that monster was me. I was the nightmare that kept |

SLIM
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 19:30:00 -
[166]
Originally by: Righteous Fury
Acting like a twelve year old in local is reserved for Counterstrike and World of Warcraft, and the Teletubbies' Great Adventure.
Teletubbies' Great Adventure? When's the beta open up!?
Seriously, though. Stain, you can't expect to win this one. At best, you'll have to hide out in your stations for a few months until we all go away.
|

Foomanshoe
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 19:35:00 -
[167]
My personal opinion
I dont see how SA didnt see Tribes making this stance. We were content to let you fight FIX, mostly because we felt we were allies with both of you pretty closely. FIX helped us in the G/IRON war and most of us used to be in SA. However when you declared on Bob and EM, you made it 1 ally against 3 allies.
You brought the fight from catch, to querious and delve, completely cutting off both our access points to empire with a very large warzone.
And to add to it, most of SA have never once respected the members of tribal souls. When we were in SA we got told we were carebears even while we were in fleets fighting G. (i have a chat log of a MASS person lecturing us about how we have to fight while she was in empire and we were currently in a gang fighting G). When we left SA said publically said we were just the fat and good riddens. And when we could no longer remain neutral SA said we were carebears and we could go screw ourselves.
Still though, alot of Tribes guys didnt like shooting old friends, and we were in talks with TRIGGER about pulling out of the war. SA used the talks and our temperary cease-fire while the talks went on to send a gang down to paragon to attack us. Thats why the talks ended.
If the only way for a mutual respect to form is through good old combat, then take the battle off the forums and onto eve. Tribals has a good reputation of being smack free. When we fight IMP and G and VC and SE, i think there are very few incidences of us smacktalking in-game or on the forums.
Im sorry that you feel betrayed.
See you in space. _______________________________________________ Deadspace For Dead space!
Originally by: Oveur
To the nerfmobile!
|

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 19:35:00 -
[168]
Originally by: SLIM
Originally by: Righteous Fury
Acting like a twelve year old in local is reserved for Counterstrike and World of Warcraft, and the Teletubbies' Great Adventure.
Teletubbies' Great Adventure? When's the beta open up!?
Seriously, though. Stain, you can't expect to win this one. At best, you'll have to hide out in your stations for a few months until we all go away.
Ur forgeting one small detail SA is dead already, we died on the forums a long time ago ;) So i will quote Amorphis
As I sense their steel, As I see the mighty one, As we all gather once again The gods of war summon us... Summon us
North wind blows to our valley Men with ships, with swords, with honour
Their horses between flames, Their dogs eating enemy childs, Our heavenly father, what is this mortality, Do you see my mortal agony
Look, I see the shield up high This must be the sign from my lord This can be my death - sentence What a fine day to die
Taste of blood comes up high Wind blows hard, our men fall... One by one This oath claims me I must bleed for my generation
Strong is the enemy, Strong is my sword The hammer is rising I feel their cold steel
Now when I leave this world I shall open the mighty oaken gate And we all shall gather once again
So Far So Good....So What |

Sarigar Shunn
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 19:37:00 -
[169]
Dianabolic, I know this is off topic, but your sig is actually a Benjamin Franklin quote.
|

Righteous Fury
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 19:47:00 -
[170]
Originally by: MrTriggerHappy Nothing like a good ol' bit of 'banter' in the local channel 
This is from Agil local, today. Banter eh?
Quote:
[19:22:50] Gardiner > 50k out dude [19:22:54] Gardiner > mabye next time [19:23:03] Tiki Rar > go go gadget block [19:30:07] MrTriggerHappy > MUHAHAHA [19:30:39] Tweety Bird > here block this you f-tard (_!_)
Really SA, I've said it before and I'll say it again. Get rid of IE-EX, and you'll get rid of half of your problems. This is my last post on the subject of smacktalk, nothing more needs to be said.
|

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 19:50:00 -
[171]
Edited by: Destroyer Draxx on 05/02/2006 19:56:13
Originally by: Sylic Edited by: Sylic on 05/02/2006 16:47:38 Rutoo you know nothing of what you talk about.. You do not know why we jumped in the fight.
We declared for much deeper reasons than anyone knows. So please keep making an a** of your self talking about what you know nothing of..
Sylic I remember having convos with u, when u were in Omist. Mass allowed u to stay there, then u joined SA if im not mistaken n now this. Please explain to me what SA have done to u personally that forced u to support this action.
Did we kick u when u were down after the xetic colapsed? I think not we allowed u to stay at ur current home although we didnt know who u were n if u would turn on us.
PS : Fairmear I still wub u 
So Far So Good....So What |

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 20:14:00 -
[172]
Originally by: Sarigar Shunn Dianabolic, I know this is off topic, but your sig is actually a Benjamin Franklin quote.
Thanks for the comment, but you are in-fact incorrect.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Reiken Moisark
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 20:15:00 -
[173]
So SA brings unlimited warfare (meaning all resources and all friends) to FIX in FAT, gets too big for their britches and decides Querious is on the menu (I have doubts they could have ever wrangled Querious from FIX, that's a different ball of wax altogether).
SA thinks their e-peen is massive and decides to attack BOB at the same time.
Now FIX and BOB brings unlimited warfare (meaning all resources and all friends) to SA and SA calls foul.
GG
Face it, you entered an e-peen measuring contest with the wrong folks this time Orc A. Can't say it's a bad thing, SA had their day. It was three days after CA died.
|

Brazzahrn Stroh
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 20:32:00 -
[174]
Not all that suprised to be honest. Maybe a bit off topic but I must say I'm impressed with SA so far. Even though you are heavyly outnumbered you keep on fighting on all fronts (I think), though it looks like you are running a bit low on cash at the moment. This is going to take longer than I expected and I commend you for that.
|

Torment
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 20:37:00 -
[175]
Thankyou Brazz,its nice to see 1 positive comment for us at the mo...And the BoB guys,i apolgise for the smack that has happened from a couple of SA members so far,its been a crazy few days but still that is no excuse and they have been talked too.
Cya all out there.
|

MrTriggerHappy
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 20:38:00 -
[176]
Originally by: Righteous Fury
Originally by: MrTriggerHappy Nothing like a good ol' bit of 'banter' in the local channel 
This is from Agil local, today. Banter eh?
Quote:
[19:22:50] Gardiner > 50k out dude [19:22:54] Gardiner > mabye next time [19:23:03] Tiki Rar > go go gadget block [19:30:07] MrTriggerHappy > MUHAHAHA [19:30:39] Tweety Bird > here block this you f-tard (_!_)
Really SA, I've said it before and I'll say it again. Get rid of IE-EX, and you'll get rid of half of your problems. This is my last post on the subject of smacktalk, nothing more needs to be said.
I consider "Muahahahah" a bit of friendly banter considering u guys tried to ***** me.. but anyway, why should the comments of 1 or 2 people represent the whole corporation.
|

Cmd Woodlouse
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 20:52:00 -
[177]
Originally by: Righteous Fury
Originally by: MrTriggerHappy Nothing like a good ol' bit of 'banter' in the local channel 
This is from Agil local, today. Banter eh?
Quote:
[19:22:50] Gardiner > 50k out dude [19:22:54] Gardiner > mabye next time [19:23:03] Tiki Rar > go go gadget block [19:30:07] MrTriggerHappy > MUHAHAHA [19:30:39] Tweety Bird > here block this you f-tard (_!_)
Really SA, I've said it before and I'll say it again. Get rid of IE-EX, and you'll get rid of half of your problems. This is my last post on the subject of smacktalk, nothing more needs to be said.
I rly rly have to ask my alliance mates for the chatlogs of several Exuro Members horrid smacktalking 
-G- Pink Power
Darko1107 > i'd rather be fat tbh :P |

Kantar
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 21:13:00 -
[178]
Edited by: Kantar on 05/02/2006 21:14:08
Originally by: Eyeshadow
Originally by: Kantar Good luck Trig and Co.
But on a personal note :
Why MC as been hired for this war as well ??
I thought the honorable thing to do is sort it out the part involve and keep the rest out of it.
Two Alliance v One and involving Merc as well is a bit low, I hope whoever hiried MC will reconsider and bring a clean fight to them.
There is a quote that come to mind reading all this :
Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself.
This are my 50 pence.
We were hired, in part, for our large capital fleet to destroy hostile POS in FAT-6P. Yesterday we took 6 hostile Large towers into reinforced mode and have finished off 4 as of this moment. The remaining 2 will soon be taken out aswell
The empire war is always an accompaniment to one of our contracts and we rarely take a contract without an empire war as that is one of our bigger strengths.
The reasons, the whos, the whys etc are of little consequence to us and your definition of honour (i.e. fair fights) does not enter into ours. We are paid to do a job, and a job we will do. Why you consider someone hiring us for a specific job as "a bit low" is beyond me. Someone wanted something to doing. We are here to do it
Thanks
I hope you understand what I mean by "low"...... not that someone hired you, but bcose with 2 alliance agaist 1 shouldnt have had the "need" for hired guns. Nothing to do with MC ( could have been any other merc corp) was only for the fact that the honorable thing to do is to give them a change of a fair fight.
I guess thats not the case.....pity...
|

j0sephine
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 21:24:00 -
[179]
"not that someone hired you, but bcose with 2 alliance agaist 1 shouldnt have had the "need" for hired guns. Nothing to do with MC ( could have been any other merc corp) was only for the fact that the honorable thing to do is to give them a change of a fair fight."
Well, doubt personally BoB had "need" to hire MC to dismantle FAT starbases... i mean, it is two regions away from home, and it's not like couldn't do it with own ships if desired so, for some odd reason.
So perhaps could as well be some 3rd party trying to cash on situation, and cleaning the area for future plans? Not like it doesn't have a few close neighbors...
|

Lek'karion
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 21:26:00 -
[180]
Originally by: Kantar Edited by: Kantar on 05/02/2006 21:14:08
Originally by: Eyeshadow
Originally by: Kantar Good luck Trig and Co.
But on a personal note :
Why MC as been hired for this war as well ??
I thought the honorable thing to do is sort it out the part involve and keep the rest out of it.
Two Alliance v One and involving Merc as well is a bit low, I hope whoever hiried MC will reconsider and bring a clean fight to them.
There is a quote that come to mind reading all this :
Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself.
This are my 50 pence.
We were hired, in part, for our large capital fleet to destroy hostile POS in FAT-6P. Yesterday we took 6 hostile Large towers into reinforced mode and have finished off 4 as of this moment. The remaining 2 will soon be taken out aswell
The empire war is always an accompaniment to one of our contracts and we rarely take a contract without an empire war as that is one of our bigger strengths.
The reasons, the whos, the whys etc are of little consequence to us and your definition of honour (i.e. fair fights) does not enter into ours. We are paid to do a job, and a job we will do. Why you consider someone hiring us for a specific job as "a bit low" is beyond me. Someone wanted something to doing. We are here to do it
Thanks
I hope you understand what I mean by "low"...... not that someone hired you, but bcose with 2 alliance agaist 1 shouldnt have had the "need" for hired guns. Nothing to do with MC ( could have been any other merc corp) was only for the fact that the honorable thing to do is to give them a change of a fair fight.
I guess thats not the case.....pity...
Yeah, but our own jobs might get fewer and further between if it became common place to try to only use even odds. I much rather for a universe where we're paid to tip the scale even further and bring round the clock destruction :)
|

Karnov
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 21:28:00 -
[181]
Originally by: Shrike
Yes, IE-EX sure does love their local.
Quote: [09:41:20] Kamikaze1 > shrike [09:41:29] Kamikaze1 > i meet u in rl dude [09:41:35] Kamikaze1 > and then .... [09:41:40] Kamikaze1 > muhahahahha [09:41:42] Shrike > And then? [09:42:10] Kamikaze1 > [09:42:17] Shrike > Im waiting, and then? [09:42:44] Kamikaze1 > na u write petitions [09:42:54] Shrike > Not at all, no petition. [09:43:06] Kamikaze1 > really [09:43:33] Kamikaze1 > muhahah [09:43:44] Shrike > Im interested as to see what kinda maturity level you actually have. [09:44:08] Kamikaze1 > u never know [09:44:41] Shrike > Was hoping this was more then teens with too many hormons. [09:44:48] Shrike > But i guess not. [09:44:48] Kamikaze1 > it is [09:45:17] Kamikaze1 > how old are u little one ? [09:45:40] Shrike > lol, take your a/sl/l elsewhere dude. [09:45:49] Kamikaze1 > o.0 [09:45:56] Kamikaze1 > u ****ed ? [09:46:02] Kamikaze1 > come on [09:46:16] Kamikaze1 > i ♥ u [09:47:26] Kamikaze1 > so u want to surrender ?
Kind of cute really.
This behaviour is disgusting, what's almost as bad is IE-EX and SA condone such behaviour.
And yes they do condone it because he's still in the Corp and Alliance and their only comment on the matter is to brush it off. I used to have some respect for SA, won't be making that mistake again.
You want to ride out the storm? Check out how the others faired with that idea, they're now reduced to parisitical alliances of inconsequence.
|

Righteous Fury
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 21:37:00 -
[182]
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse I rly rly have to ask my alliance mates for the chatlogs of several Exuro Members horrid smacktalking 
I am well aware of it, and they have been reprimanded for it since. Don't bring up logs from serveral weeks/months ago, they are meaningless.
|

Alisa Beno
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 21:40:00 -
[183]
Why do people try and apply some standards to honor?
So someone hired MC. Maybe it was faster to get to there goal hiring someone to help them?
When have wars EVER been equal? Just look at history one side always have more of a advantage then the other. |

Estarriol
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 22:20:00 -
[184]
Originally by: Kantar I hope you understand what I mean by "low"...... not that someone hired you, but bcose with 2 alliance agaist 1 shouldnt have had the "need" for hired guns. Nothing to do with MC ( could have been any other merc corp) was only for the fact that the honorable thing to do is to give them a change of a fair fight.
Your concept of honor has no basis in reality. The chance to settle things 'honorably' was to abide by the negotiated terms. For their own obscure reasons, SA chose instead to 'bring it' to our home systems. Now, the game is being playing according to the rules they chose, and you want to file a complaint?
|

CtapikKozlodoyev
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 23:15:00 -
[185]
Edited by: CtapikKozlodoyev on 05/02/2006 23:15:35
|

Sceartan
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 23:18:00 -
[186]
Originally by: Karnov
This behaviour is disgusting, what's almost as bad is IE-EX and SA condone such behaviour.
And yes they do condone it because he's still in the Corp and Alliance and their only comment on the matter is to brush it off. I used to have some respect for SA, won't be making that mistake again.
You want to ride out the storm? Check out how the others faired with that idea, they're now reduced to parisitical alliances of inconsequence.
It is disgusting and pathetic but SA do not condone such behaviour. I have repeatidly asked people to stop behaving like children when it comes to forums & Local chat however, I am but one voice in a sea of a thousand smackers so my voice is drowned out quite quickly. There is also threads on the SA forum in both CEO chat & SA Membership boards that are asking people to stop smacking.
So, on behalf of the silent majority of Stain, I apologise for the level of conversation in local and on these forums. If you wish to make specific complaints, and please feel free to, then send me a mail in game or convo me. I'll talk the offender parties CEO and endeavour to make sure it stops.
Originally by: Riddlock
Yea sceartan maybe some of the SA have a clue about what happend there, maybe the bold <3 will let you know guys what really happend at that time. I can only speak for myself now , with every single SA beeing crocky about tribe and about how much of a miners we are and how much we suk roids and how much we betrayed SA in the G / IRON war never helped to get a really friendly relationship .
I know what happened, I was merely stating that at the time there was no Tribal Souls it was just one Stain Alliance and the brokered deal was agreed upon by SA leadership at the time. Only after this, did Tribal form and the corps in the PS/Eso area left SA. Hence, no back stabbing 
|

OVERCOPES 1
|
Posted - 2006.02.05 23:49:00 -
[187]
Wouldnt it be easier to have a no talking in local policy,i know for a fact if anyone smacktalks in local while selderaie is leading,he'd prolly pod the offender.
Brutors out of control?Sebiestors becoming work shy? Worry no more. Use vitoc,makes the stubornist apes clean faster!!!!
|

Nick Curso
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 02:15:00 -
[188]
Originally by: Shrike
Originally by: HellsRazor MC id just like to say... smack aside(those that really had chance to talk and have fun know wassup) i understand you keep it simple and have contract.. nothing on you guys at all. See you on the field and you make it fun :). again anyone offended or taken local fun to heart ,holla... ill direct to others :)
Best to all... dont take local so personal IEEX dont care and love the fun. (cant speak for other SA)
Yes, IE-EX sure does love their local.
Quote: [09:41:20] Kamikaze1 > shrike [09:41:29] Kamikaze1 > i meet u in rl dude [09:41:35] Kamikaze1 > and then .... [09:41:40] Kamikaze1 > muhahahahha [09:41:42] Shrike > And then? [09:42:10] Kamikaze1 > [09:42:17] Shrike > Im waiting, and then? [09:42:44] Kamikaze1 > na u write petitions [09:42:54] Shrike > Not at all, no petition. [09:43:06] Kamikaze1 > really [09:43:33] Kamikaze1 > muhahah [09:43:44] Shrike > Im interested as to see what kinda maturity level you actually have. [09:44:08] Kamikaze1 > u never know [09:44:41] Shrike > Was hoping this was more then teens with too many hormons. [09:44:48] Shrike > But i guess not. [09:44:48] Kamikaze1 > it is [09:45:17] Kamikaze1 > how old are u little one ? [09:45:40] Shrike > lol, take your a/sl/l elsewhere dude. [09:45:49] Kamikaze1 > o.0 [09:45:56] Kamikaze1 > u ****ed ? [09:46:02] Kamikaze1 > come on [09:46:16] Kamikaze1 > i ♥ u [09:47:26] Kamikaze1 > so u want to surrender ?
Kind of cute really.
If this is what things are like i am truely ashamed to be associated with such immaturity.
|

Emily Black
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 04:03:00 -
[189]
I can understand the motives of the bob lackys, but tbh tribal souls made a critical error, since they are a soft target with much to lose, stain isn't going anywhere and when IRON/G attack bob and and BoB is forced to turn its attention to its homeland, where do you think a very battle hardend stain is going to turn?
|

Xarvos
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 04:34:00 -
[190]
Originally by: Emily Black I can understand the motives of the bob lackys, but tbh tribal souls made a critical error, since they are a soft target with much to lose, stain isn't going anywhere and when IRON/G attack bob and and BoB is forced to turn its attention to its homeland, where do you think a very battle hardend stain is going to turn?
we are going to turn on velds roids thats for sure , Nick is back in Mass ?!  ---------------------------------------------
Let's have some fun shall we ?
|

CopeLand
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 07:01:00 -
[191]
Originally by: Foomanshoe My personal opinion
I dont see how SA didnt see Tribes making this stance. We were content to let you fight FIX, mostly because we felt we were allies with both of you pretty closely. FIX helped us in the G/IRON war and most of us used to be in SA. However when you declared on Bob and EM, you made it 1 ally against 3 allies.
You brought the fight from catch, to querious and delve, completely cutting off both our access points to empire with a very large warzone.
And to add to it, most of SA have never once respected the members of tribal souls. When we were in SA we got told we were carebears even while we were in fleets fighting G. (i have a chat log of a MASS person lecturing us about how we have to fight while she was in empire and we were currently in a gang fighting G). When we left SA said publically said we were just the fat and good riddens. And when we could no longer remain neutral SA said we were carebears and we could go screw ourselves.
Still though, alot of Tribes guys didnt like shooting old friends, and we were in talks with TRIGGER about pulling out of the war. SA used the talks and our temperary cease-fire while the talks went on to send a gang down to paragon to attack us. Thats why the talks ended.
If the only way for a mutual respect to form is through good old combat, then take the battle off the forums and onto eve. Tribals has a good reputation of being smack free. When we fight IMP and G and VC and SE, i think there are very few incidences of us smacktalking in-game or on the forums.
Im sorry that you feel betrayed.
See you in space.
1)tribals concerns in this matter were nonexistant if they had standings to fix, bob, and sa, what do they care if they have to pass through
tribal choose to enter this, whatever their reasons
2)some if not all tribal corps are old sa corps they left sa to protect their outpost and southern complexes and got a nap with g or some sort of a deal, they bailed out of that war
naturally at the time, some ppl were bound to react to this, some in negative manner
|

CopeLand
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 07:12:00 -
[192]
Originally by: Reiken Moisark So SA brings unlimited warfare (meaning all resources and all friends) to FIX in FAT, gets too big for their britches and decides Querious is on the menu (I have doubts they could have ever wrangled Querious from FIX, that's a different ball of wax altogether).
SA thinks their e-peen is massive and decides to attack BOB at the same time.
Now FIX and BOB brings unlimited warfare (meaning all resources and all friends) to SA and SA calls foul.
GG
Face it, you entered an e-peen measuring contest with the wrong folks this time Orc A. Can't say it's a bad thing, SA had their day. It was three days after CA died.
hello fix alt
yes after fix declared sa kos, sa had some other entities friendly with them vs fix and asuya and co, most notably huzzah and then kaos for a short period.
then bob entervined and laid down some terms. i think none of them said entities were happy with them terms, cept maybe fix.
southern stability concept is bull****, since fix were allowed by "whomever" is protecting that thing to wardec sa. after intelligence reports indicated bob was gonna wardec sa in few hours, a pre-strike was launched.
the only foul is see are boring forums alts twisting the truth and then power-mad ppl telling other unrelated entities how to react and treat developments in the game
|

ProphetGuru
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 07:21:00 -
[193]
Originally by: CopeLand after intelligence reports indicated bob was gonna wardec sa in few hours, a pre-strike was launched.
I've seen this posted a few times now. SA must have really crappy intel.... maybe Bared is still playing at politics. We seldom wardec anyone, we live in 0.0 .... it never does us any good to be honest.
SA believing we would attack them first without a word? pfft. I don't buy into that and I highly doubt any Stainers that have been around more then 2yrs would buy into it either. It's not how we operate... when we go off to fight someone we don't exactly keep it a secret.
Someone in SA has wound up this situation from the get go..... I wonder who that could be.
Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
|

Riddlock
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 07:31:00 -
[194]
Originally by: CopeLand
Originally by: Foomanshoe My personal opinion
I dont see how SA didnt see Tribes making this stance. We were content to let you fight FIX, mostly because we felt we were allies with both of you pretty closely. FIX helped us in the G/IRON war and most of us used to be in SA. However when you declared on Bob and EM, you made it 1 ally against 3 allies.
You brought the fight from catch, to querious and delve, completely cutting off both our access points to empire with a very large warzone.
And to add to it, most of SA have never once respected the members of tribal souls. When we were in SA we got told we were carebears even while we were in fleets fighting G. (i have a chat log of a MASS person lecturing us about how we have to fight while she was in empire and we were currently in a gang fighting G). When we left SA said publically said we were just the fat and good riddens. And when we could no longer remain neutral SA said we were carebears and we could go screw ourselves.
Still though, alot of Tribes guys didnt like shooting old friends, and we were in talks with TRIGGER about pulling out of the war. SA used the talks and our temperary cease-fire while the talks went on to send a gang down to paragon to attack us. Thats why the talks ended.
If the only way for a mutual respect to form is through good old combat, then take the battle off the forums and onto eve. Tribals has a good reputation of being smack free. When we fight IMP and G and VC and SE, i think there are very few incidences of us smacktalking in-game or on the forums.
Im sorry that you feel betrayed.
See you in space.
1)tribals concerns in this matter were nonexistant if they had standings to fix, bob, and sa, what do they care if they have to pass through
tribal choose to enter this, whatever their reasons
2)some if not all tribal corps are old sa corps they left sa to protect their outpost and southern complexes and got a nap with g or some sort of a deal, they bailed out of that war
naturally at the time, some ppl were bound to react to this, some in negative manner
Keep talking about things that you have no clue copeland ,keep thinking we left to protect an outpost and how we napped G /Iron .We'll see how those will solve this thing .
|

dantes inferno
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 07:35:00 -
[195]
Quote: SA believing we would attack them first without a word?
well no matter what intellegence we may or may not had, the thread made by orc a didnt help matters, when you see several bob members asking fix and tiad to gang them..its natural to assume that it is on bobs agenda to attack us, even with denials futher on its safer to think that some one had let the cat out of the bag to early rather than bob will not attack. _____ This is a Stain Alliance Fighter. It is protecting the assets of Stain Alliance, and may attack anyone it perceives as a threat, Threat Level: Trigglarist Fundermentalist |

ProphetGuru
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 07:55:00 -
[196]
Originally by: dantes inferno
Quote: SA believing we would attack them first without a word?
well no matter what intellegence we may or may not had, the thread made by orc a didnt help matters, when you see several bob members asking fix and tiad to gang them..its natural to assume that it is on bobs agenda to attack us, even with denials futher on its safer to think that some one had let the cat out of the bag to early rather than bob will not attack.
hmm. 2 years down the drain cuz someone said gang me in a forum post? A logical decision would have been to set a defensive posture, and put out scouts. Not in sending a token fleet to get butchered on our doorstep and end all hope of a diplomatic solution. It doesn't make sense. Mass has been the sole voice of reason, for the most part anyways, out of SA since this began, and I surely can't see you guys, given our history, buying into a preemptive the way it was done.
Someone let their epeen do their thinking for them, and riled the boys up down there into a bloodfrenzy without considering the ramifacations, or 2 1/2 years of history.
Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
|

Kamikaze1
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 08:15:00 -
[197]
Quote Quote 
Originally by: SirMolle
Stain will be wiped out. Goodbye.
|

Dracorimus
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 09:02:00 -
[198]
Edited by: Dracorimus on 06/02/2006 09:03:27 You know, it's really simple. All you need to do is click the minimize button for local as I do, kick back, relax and listen to what your FC tells ya to do and go do it, is it THAT difficult. ?
Also, my major complaint of SA atm IS this very thing of calling names/smacking us as we enter local....Why do it ?
We are at war, let the guns and actions in-game speak for you, to quote a phrase:
"Actions speak louder than words"
In summary: More action less verbal plz -
Comin' at ya! |

Kamikaze1
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 09:09:00 -
[199]
Edited by: Kamikaze1 on 06/02/2006 09:14:24
i agree more action wud be nice...
Originally by: SirMolle
Stain will be wiped out. Goodbye.
|

Koronos
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 15:06:00 -
[200]
IEEX guys, please please please stop with the smack. It is silly, lame, and ridiculous most of the time, and completely unnacceptable, embarrassing, and disgusting when it ventures into real life.
Kami, for this last post, I know you are just having a bit of fun, this is certainly not to the level of the other things people are pointing out, but still, Shrike _did_ come to our home, and if I read the tea leaves correctly he was not entirely unsuccessful on his trip, regardless of the end result.
For the community, it is true that IEEX does not have a no-smack policy, but it is not true that we all condone and engage in it, a fact that I think a number of our enemies in the last months could support. We have had any number of battles against iron, arin, asuya, some pa guys, and on and on which resulted in friendly conversation afterward, if anything.
I think that just in the last couple weeks there has been a lot of frustration and feeling of being disrespected, which has resulted in this. I would hope that we will see that giving respect is a much better way to earn respect than giving smack is.
Thanks for your time, Koronos
|

corporal hicks
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 16:47:00 -
[201]
Originally by: dantes inferno
Quote: SA believing we would attack them first without a word?
well no matter what intellegence we may or may not had, the thread made by orc a didnt help matters, when you see several bob members asking fix and tiad to gang them..its natural to assume that it is on bobs agenda to attack us, even with denials futher on its safer to think that some one had let the cat out of the bag to early rather than bob will not attack.
Well Dantes I know you probably wont belive me but the thread your talking about that was started by Orc A was the thread I replied in, after this Dianabolic replied "Gang me" to me. Now the bit you might not belive, Diana and me did not talk about anything, there were no discussions between the Traid and BOB as regards SA, FIX and BOB maybe but the Traid did not talk to BOB.
Much as you and some of the other stainers would like to think that The Traid work for FIX, we dont, So Diana replying to me in the thread was a Joke! nothing more and if you and Stain could see that then maybe you would not have made the blunder that BOB were going to attack with FIX, Again I will state The Traid are not FIX alts, I have 30 Million sp, belive me if this Character is a alt I would love to see how many SP my main has :)
And before Masta killa says it again "yes I am a FIX alt" getting old......
" Stay Frosty "
|

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 17:35:00 -
[202]
Originally by: corporal hicks
Originally by: dantes inferno
Quote: SA believing we would attack them first without a word?
well no matter what intellegence we may or may not had, the thread made by orc a didnt help matters, when you see several bob members asking fix and tiad to gang them..its natural to assume that it is on bobs agenda to attack us, even with denials futher on its safer to think that some one had let the cat out of the bag to early rather than bob will not attack.
Well Dantes I know you probably wont belive me but the thread your talking about that was started by Orc A was the thread I replied in, after this Dianabolic replied "Gang me" to me. Now the bit you might not belive, Diana and me did not talk about anything, there were no discussions between the Traid and BOB as regards SA, FIX and BOB maybe but the Traid did not talk to BOB.
Much as you and some of the other stainers would like to think that The Traid work for FIX, we dont, So Diana replying to me in the thread was a Joke! nothing more and if you and Stain could see that then maybe you would not have made the blunder that BOB were going to attack with FIX, Again I will state The Traid are not FIX alts, I have 30 Million sp, belive me if this Character is a alt I would love to see how many SP my main has :)
And before Masta killa says it again "yes I am a FIX alt" getting old......
post with ur main ;P
So Far So Good....So What |

dantes inferno
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 17:59:00 -
[203]
Edited by: dantes inferno on 06/02/2006 18:01:44
Quote: out of SA since this began, and I surely can't see you guys, given our history, buying into a preemptive the way it was done
i didnt say i agreed with what was done mate, quite the opposit and i made my opinions quite clear on the matter internaly..but i do understand how that decision could of been made and what could of lead to many people in SA to expect and inement(sp?) attack of BOB. But now the situation has happned i will support the alliance in every way i can, and hope that in due time a sensible solution will be found.
Quote: Well Dantes I know you probably wont belive me but the thread your talking about that was started by Orc A was the thread I replied in, after this Dianabolic replied "Gang me" to me. Now the bit you might not belive, Diana and me did not talk about anything, there were no discussions between the Traid and BOB as regards SA, FIX and BOB maybe but the Traid did not talk to BOB.
i did not mean to imply some pre arranged scheme mindless, what i was pointing out was a high profile BOB member asking to gang with people stating their intention to attack SA..that would be enough to make any one expect a attack..expetionly taking into account the situation at hand. _____ This is a Stain Alliance Fighter. It is protecting the assets of Stain Alliance, and may attack anyone it perceives as a threat, Threat Level: Trigglarist Fundermentalist |

Backdoor Bandit
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 18:07:00 -
[204]
Edited by: Backdoor Bandit on 06/02/2006 18:07:43 The MGRL position on this is that anybody who sets alliance foreign policy based on what someone said on the eve-o forums deserves everything they get.
The MGRL, Fighting for YOUR right to approach from the rear! |

Parity
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 18:20:00 -
[205]
I feel sorry for alliances like tribal/fix running around BoB and doing what they say just coz they wanna live after...
GL Stain...
-= FrEE4ALL 4TW! =- |

Turin
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 18:21:00 -
[206]
I must admit. Some small part of me wishes I were still in the south to see the smackdown of SA.
I have to be honest, when my corp disbanded, and SA as knocking on the door to FAT. I thought SA had fix beat. It was one of the things that made me decide to fight in the north ( aside from prefering to fight Gurista Mobs )
But things have changed drmatically. SA is toast. They have made some very bad tactical moves ( attack BOB ) that have pretty much sealed the end of thier hold on SA space.
|

Turin
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 18:30:00 -
[207]
Originally by: IcedBach Jr Signed...
And may Tribal Souls die... their betrayal will never be forgotten by any real SA and they are now SA's number one enemy.
Other entities might just consider if what SA did was smth different they would have done in the same situation before jumping on the Boobs wagon.
FIX make us KOS We attack FIX We beat FIX We get given crap by other alliance formerly friendly. We stand up for out honour and our members We stand tall but alone.
Just remember that most of SA has been in this game a long time and know how these things work and Stain is a big place.
Interesting take on it. I didnt know "Honor" meant welching on already formed cease fire agreements, and doing everything you can do to insult your enemy by forcing humiliating terms on them AFTER you agreed to FAIR and HONORABLE terms before hand.
Great defenition of Honor. Someone call Websters fast. They need to update the dictionary.
|

corporal hicks
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 18:36:00 -
[208]
Originally by: dantes inferno Edited by: dantes inferno on 06/02/2006 18:01:44
Quote: out of SA since this began, and I surely can't see you guys, given our history, buying into a preemptive the way it was done
i didnt say i agreed with what was done mate, quite the opposit and i made my opinions quite clear on the matter internaly..but i do understand how that decision could of been made and what could of lead to many people in SA to expect and inement(sp?) attack of BOB. But now the situation has happned i will support the alliance in every way i can, and hope that in due time a sensible solution will be found.
Quote: Well Dantes I know you probably wont belive me but the thread your talking about that was started by Orc A was the thread I replied in, after this Dianabolic replied "Gang me" to me. Now the bit you might not belive, Diana and me did not talk about anything, there were no discussions between the Traid and BOB as regards SA, FIX and BOB maybe but the Traid did not talk to BOB.
i did not mean to imply some pre arranged scheme mindless, what i was pointing out was a high profile BOB member asking to gang with people stating their intention to attack SA..that would be enough to make any one expect a attack..expetionly taking into account the situation at hand.
Ehh I am not mindlles, the lack of spelling errors should at least give that away
To Destroyer Draxx its really getting old the FIX alt stuff, if you really belive it I guess the tooth fairy and Santa claus are your two best mates!
" Stay Frosty "
|

Turin
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 18:48:00 -
[209]
Originally by: fisho Should SA die, of which i am not sure will happen. I just hope that FIX don't try to claim any victory. We have already seen that you can't take SA, and were desperate for a NAP, but now seem to be all for war now every man and his dog is against SA.
I love how everyone beats on FIX for "Not taking SA"
IT was more like "Not taking SA, KAOS, Huzzah"
3 alliances + some randoms. So its not like they were "chumps or anything" And now that the situation has changed ( multi allinaces on SA ) everyone rags on FIX for it. Why is it okay the S with multiple alliances attacked FIX, and everyone was all for it, but now that its the other way around, FIX suck and are lame cheap OMG WTF for attacking SA and having multiple alliances helping them out. Seems a bit hypocritical to me.
|

Xelios
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 18:49:00 -
[210]
Quote: i didnt say i agreed with what was done mate, quite the opposit and i made my opinions quite clear on the matter internaly..but i do understand how that decision could of been made and what could of lead to many people in SA to expect and inement(sp?) attack of BOB. But now the situation has happned i will support the alliance in every way i can, and hope that in due time a sensible solution will be found.
QFT
This isn't meant as an attack, but I honestly wonder what BoB's response would have been had the cease fire talks with FIX broken down completely. If SA would have continued the offensive into FIX space without that first attack on BoB would we (SA) be in a different position now?
I don't imagine BoB sitting that out, and others felt the same.
There's more to say but it doesn't matter. It's all been done, and I'm about ready for some good pvp =D
Signature removed. -Zhuge ([email protected]) Woot.
|

Turin
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 18:51:00 -
[211]
Originally by: dalman Edited by: dalman on 05/02/2006 01:28:56
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: fisho Should SA die, of which i am not sure will happen. I just hope that FIX don't try to claim any victory. We have already seen that you can't take SA, and were desperate for a NAP, but now seem to be all for war now every man and his dog is against SA.
Erm, fisho - FIX were fighting against 3 times their number - against SA I think it was fairly equal, against SA and friends they certainly did lose some ground - now the boot is on the other foot, and suddenly it's "different"?
Just doesn't compute with me.
Dianabolic, cut the crap. FIX alliance had higher numbers than SA. FIX trial corps (doing more fighting than their full members) has surely the same numbers as HF were sending. TRIAD corps (though only on rare occations in Q) can easily be compared to the KAOS pilots who were there for 1 1/2 week.
FIX weren't outnumbered. Neither in total numbers, nor on the battlefield. On the contrary, 22 hours a day they outnumbered us in local in both FAT, 9CG and H74. The problem was they spent 21 of these hours at their POSes. At the same time, some of them showed great dedication; in some battle there were pilots getting new ships from station to die 3 times in one single battle. The only conclusion is that they lacked alot in leadership. Only when Major Riven (FoFF) were around did they seem to have any organisation at all.
*edit* btw, neither you nor anyone else answered my question about how your signature relates to this situation 
bhahahahha. What a crock of sh!t. I was there. This is a blatant lie. We were almost always outnumberd. KAOS was only there 2 weeks, but they had a DREAD fleet. like that is something to write off as if it didnt happen or something.
|

Christopher Multsanti
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 19:01:00 -
[212]
I don't know why this war started and I don't care, I just like supporting the underdogs. GL Stain.
Death and Glory in H-PA
|

ProphetGuru
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 19:09:00 -
[213]
Originally by: Xelios This isn't meant as an attack, but I honestly wonder what BoB's response would have been had the cease fire talks with FIX broken down completely.
We'll never know now of course, but one thing I can say with confidence is that had we decided to come calling you would have been made aware of it. We don't and never have Pearl Harbor'd our allies, regardless of Cpt pug and Bauns revisionist history of our dismantling of that which we created, FA.
Either way, as you say, :) targets are good and it should be fun 
Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
|

dalman
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 19:22:00 -
[214]
Originally by: Turin bhahahahha. What a crock of sh!t. I was there. This is a blatant lie. We were almost always outnumberd. KAOS was only there 2 weeks, but they had a DREAD fleet. like that is something to write off as if it didnt happen or something.
Uhh, what? You know we didn't destroy any POS, right? We took one (not in FAT) into reinforce mode, but traid came to help and stopped the destruction of it (at expence of many ships). And we did one(1!) assault on a POS in FAT (which KAOS dreads were part of). That assault was however aborted: the system was so lagged out that our fleet couldn't assist our dreads in a correct way(it'd be killed like flies by the POS in that lag) if you would have had the balls to attack. And no dreads were used in any fleet combat. So how exactly is the 3? Dreads KAOS sent in important for the outcome of the war?
Your comment about numbers is about as accurate as your description of how important these dreads were in the war. Drink up, shoot in. Let the beating begin. Distributor of pain. Your loss becomes my gain...
|

USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:38:00 -
[215]
Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers USN
|

Wee Dave
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:43:00 -
[216]
It's good to see we're in tin hat season again.
|

Righteous Fury
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:43:00 -
[217]
Originally by: USN CVN73 Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers USN
Okay, seriously, just stop. You have surpassed the bounds of stupidity into the uncharted realm of utter moronic retardism. Someone please get rid of this assclown.
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:43:00 -
[218]
Originally by: USN CVN73 Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers USN
Were you dropped one your head whilst wearing a tin foil hat as a child?
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Sarigar Shunn
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:50:00 -
[219]
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Sarigar Shunn Dianabolic, I know this is off topic, but your sig is actually a Benjamin Franklin quote.
Thanks for the comment, but you are in-fact incorrect.
I can't read the link without registering!
I've used the quote extensively since it's become relevant.
Yours is actually a common paraphrase of one attributed to Ben Franklin: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." from the intro page of "An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania", published in 1789.
here's a link: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin
a page in which some guy buys an original copy of the book to check if the quote's actually there: http://www.futureofthebook.com/stories/storyReader$605
(I wish I had the kind of money this guy spends just to fact check!)
Anyway, just google it. It's such a cool quote that it should be properly attributed.
To keep this reply on-topic: Go SA!

|

USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:50:00 -
[220]
yup rightious fury USN smokes *****! I will post what i feel is correct. i pay my own accounts and i do as i please. if you dont want to read it thats up to u but to make outright flames is inmature and totally uncalled for.
Rightious Fury. go learn how to be a man and stop flaming.
USN
|

ProphetGuru
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 20:54:00 -
[221]
Edited by: ProphetGuru on 06/02/2006 20:54:22
Originally by: USN CVN73 Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts
Quote: With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix
Classic example of forum detectives convincing themself they are right cuz ummmm like.. it sounds like a good one.
Dude, you went from "suspicion of"... to "duh it's clear".. in 1 paragraph.
One of the true constants in life is that people who say, "it's clear" or "clearly" are usually trying to convince themself of their own misguided opinion.
Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
|

USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 21:03:00 -
[222]
noone ever said i was a good writer. but thank you for that english lesson...
|

Weco
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 21:03:00 -
[223]
I think you are quite close to the truth there USN, however you forgot to include the illegal nuclear tests Molle is running in his backyard, and the mutant ninja dogs Dianabolic is hiding in his subterrainian facility called "the lair". Seriously, stop posting on eve-o, youre just embarassing your alliance.
____________________________________________ My sig? |

Sochin
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 21:23:00 -
[224]
Originally by: USN CVN73 Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers USN
Let me quote the great film Billy Madison to answer this:
"What you just said is the most insanely idiotic thing I have ever heard. At no point were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it."
Nemo me impune lacessit
|

Turin
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 21:33:00 -
[225]
Just have to agree with whateverone else said regarding USN's BOB = FIX comments.
That might by chance be the most retarded thing I have read on these forums in months.
BOB = FIX. We had a blast letting you beat up our alts that we formed FIX with. Now that you ****ed us off, we are bringing our MAINS in BOB to crush you.....
Ya. makes total sense to me.
|

HC MasiEEE
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 21:43:00 -
[226]
USN CVN73 post might be "retarted", but it made me laugh and i needed that  ____________ HC MasiEEE
|

BirdBleed
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 22:01:00 -
[227]
Edited by: BirdBleed on 06/02/2006 22:01:21
Originally by: USN CVN73 Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers USN
Does that mean we are alts of alts ?  damn im gonna forget who my main is if this keeps up
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 22:30:00 -
[228]
damn funny ;) - Purple Conquered The World, We the Universe.
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 22:45:00 -
[229]
Originally by: Sarigar Shunn
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Sarigar Shunn Dianabolic, I know this is off topic, but your sig is actually a Benjamin Franklin quote.
Thanks for the comment, but you are in-fact incorrect.
I can't read the link without registering!
I've used the quote extensively since it's become relevant.
Yours is actually a common paraphrase of one attributed to Ben Franklin: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." from the intro page of "An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania", published in 1789.
here's a link: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin
a page in which some guy buys an original copy of the book to check if the quote's actually there: http://www.futureofthebook.com/stories/storyReader$605
(I wish I had the kind of money this guy spends just to fact check!)
Anyway, just google it. It's such a cool quote that it should be properly attributed.
To keep this reply on-topic: Go SA!

ugh, that should be a public forum. OK, here's teh post:
I post this here so I can link my sig to it, to stop repeating myself :)
My signature on the eve-o forums, at this time:
Quote: A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither.
I've attributed those words to Thomas Jefferson, as according to various internet sources (and civilisation 4, where I first saw the quote) these were his, exact, words. However, the first time someone questioned the quote, he did so by stating that these words were those of Benjamin Franklin.
So, I looked it up: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin.
Franklins' quote was subtley different, though I will surely concede that he was the first to illustrate the connection that Jefferson later picked up on:
Quote: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
So, I compared the two; because in my opinion the two quotes have very different meanings. Franklin refers to a temporary sacrifice, Jeffersons' quote, at least to me, indicates something more permanent. Franklin also refers to "essential" liberty, a concept which I actually find quite impossible to grasp - for as humans, other than food, water and shelter, there is nothing in our lives that is "essential". Jefferson just refers to them as they are, with no emphasis importance.
For that reason, though I certainly agree with Franklins' words and the concept he puts forward, it most certainly is Thomas Jeffersons words, in full knowledge of what they mean and the context in which they were said, that I have in my signature.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 22:58:00 -
[230]
we play this game to have fun right? if we cant laugh at some insane thought such as my posting. the game should be Real life then. Wont you agree? Forums are not supposed to be so serious nor should it be like real life politics. Damn if i wanted to hear real life stuffs all i would do is turn on CNN...
But i pay my Earned $ to play a game and to post on forums as i see fit as long as it is not degrading to any one person. I am following the rules set forth by CCP in posting things that i see may be going on regardless if it is fact or fiction. Its up to the rest of eve to say USN is completely crazy or perhaps some of the stuff he says have some truth.
Over all i am very pleased with the response to my recent post only one i am extremely disappointed with is Rightous Fury. His direct flame toward me proves he is inmature.
Lets all take this game just a little less serious and make it just a little more fun. Thats what i try to do everytime i come up with such crazy ideas as i have done since i started playing this game in june of 2003.
Cheers USN
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:02:00 -
[231]
Originally by: Eyeshadow
Originally by: Kantar Good luck Trig and Co.
But on a personal note :
Why MC as been hired for this war as well ??
I thought the honorable thing to do is sort it out the part involve and keep the rest out of it.
Two Alliance v One and involving Merc as well is a bit low, I hope whoever hiried MC will reconsider and bring a clean fight to them.
There is a quote that come to mind reading all this :
Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself.
This are my 50 pence.
We were hired, in part, for our large capital fleet to destroy hostile POS in FAT-6P. Yesterday we took 6 hostile Large towers into reinforced mode and have finished off 4 as of this moment. The remaining 2 will soon be taken out aswell
The empire war is always an accompaniment to one of our contracts and we rarely take a contract without an empire war as that is one of our bigger strengths.
The reasons, the whos, the whys etc are of little consequence to us and your definition of honour (i.e. fair fights) does not enter into ours. We are paid to do a job, and a job we will do. Why you consider someone hiring us for a specific job as "a bit low" is beyond me. Someone wanted something to doing. We are here to do it
Thanks
i would have the greatest repect for the MC if i could believe this. what if insted u got the convo from some guy to be hired to fight bob on SA side. would u guys of taken the contract.
if u are truly unbiased and isk dictates your enermys then i take my hat off to the MC. it shows that you are up to fighting anyone, even if greatly outnumbered. but if as i would suspect that you guys get offers to fight both sides yet you pick the easier option [i dont know much about the MC but i would assume this is the case. correct me if i am wrong] then i have no repect for you and u are just as bad as the other band wagon jumpers.
|

Koronos
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:06:00 -
[232]
Originally by: Gronsak <snip> [i dont know much about the MC but i would assume this is the case. <snip>
Why would you make assumptions about something you don't know much about? :)
Koronos
|

RogerWilco
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:14:00 -
[233]
I predict that SE and SAŠs death are comming soon, and that we will see trigger as a EVOL bisch soooon 
|

IcedBach Jr
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:16:00 -
[234]
And why are SA's still responding to BooB smack on forumz instead of reading their own.
 Praeludium to success |

Orc A
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:21:00 -
[235]
I predict some big alliances getting really bored very soon... Heck, we're bored already...
Weren't we supposed to be dead by now...?
|

corporal hicks
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:22:00 -
[236]
Originally by: BirdBleed Edited by: BirdBleed on 06/02/2006 22:01:21
Originally by: USN CVN73 Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers USN
Does that mean we are alts of alts ?  damn im gonna forget who my main is if this keeps up
Roflmao, ok seriously I have to admit, I am a FIX alt, my main is wraithstorm but his main is Dianabolic but!!!! what you dont know is Diana's main is Orc A! and we have, I mean me, or was it him has played you all!
Next week...Elvis exposed as a Member of Shinra
" Stay Frosty "
|

Randay
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:30:00 -
[237]
... I'm Rick James, *****! ------------------------------------------- "Det hSr kan betyda krig!" |

JerrySpringer
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:35:00 -
[238]
Edited by: JerrySpringer on 06/02/2006 23:38:39
Originally by: Gronsak < MC neutral? >
Don't be fooled, MC and BoB are +++ standing, enough said. MC never took contract on any BoB aligned organization.
EDIT: let me elaborate a bit: if MC were to be hostile to BoB or their associates, they'd have plenty to lose and little to win. BoB would definitely use that opportunity to kick MC about, and MC couldn't afford the bad press. So BoB keeps MC friendly and MC knows what's good for em.
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:35:00 -
[239]
Originally by: Koronos
Originally by: Gronsak <snip> [i dont know much about the MC but i would assume this is the case. <snip>
Why would you make assumptions about something you don't know much about? :)
Koronos
thats what i put down to correct me if i was wrong
and btw selective quotes ftw. i need to do that one day by specificly just selecting quotes word by word to show how misleading it can be
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:38:00 -
[240]
Originally by: USN CVN73 play this game.laugh at some insane thought. the game be Real life . Wont you agree? Forums are supposed to be serious. Damn CNN...
just useing your last post as a example of selective quating. lol its funney tbh. usually not that far. but u get what i mean, dont selective quote to put ur point across.
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:38:00 -
[241]
Originally by: JerrySpringer
Originally by: Gronsak < MC neutral? >
Don't be fooled, MC and BoB are +++ standing, enough said. MC never took contract on any BoB aligned organization.
hahahahaha
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
So, ASCN, nor Five, are our friends? orly?
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

JerrySpringer
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:42:00 -
[242]
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: JerrySpringer
Originally by: Gronsak < MC neutral? >
Don't be fooled, MC and BoB are +++ standing, enough said. MC never took contract on any BoB aligned organization.
hahahahaha
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
So, ASCN, nor Five, are our friends? orly?
Yes, maybe aligned is too strong a word.
ASCN are simply "useful idiots" (Lenin quote, not a flame towards ASCN) and the 5 can very well fend for themselves.
|

USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:47:00 -
[243]
Originally by: Gronsak
Originally by: USN CVN73 play this game.laugh at some insane thought. the game be Real life . Wont you agree? Forums are supposed to be serious. Damn CNN...
just useing your last post as a example of selective quating. lol its funney tbh. usually not that far. but u get what i mean, dont selective quote to put ur point across.
I AM NOT A ENGLISH MAJOR... Thank you for the correction!!!
But if u want to be critical hehe your spelling is not perfect "useing" hmm. hehe just wanted to be funny!
USN
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:53:00 -
[244]
Edited by: Gronsak on 06/02/2006 23:54:07
Originally by: USN CVN73
Originally by: Gronsak
Originally by: USN CVN73 play this game.laugh at some insane thought. the game be Real life . Wont you agree? Forums are supposed to be serious. Damn CNN...
just useing your last post as a example of selective quating. lol its funney tbh. usually not that far. but u get what i mean, dont selective quote to put ur point across.
I AM NOT A ENGLISH MAJOR... Thank you for the correction!!!
But if u want to be critical hehe your spelling is not perfect "useing" hmm. hehe just wanted to be funny!
USN
wasnt complaing about ur english. or anything about u. just looked for the newest post with was pretty long. to prove a point to some dude which selectively quoted me.
|

Khaerie
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 00:19:00 -
[245]
Thread is too long to read. I just have one question. Who's in charge of Stain? One post (and one news article) says it is Orc A and not to listen to Trigger. Now we have Trigger making announcments again. Did I miss a post elsewhere that now says Trigger is in charge? |

Zubenelgenubi
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 00:33:00 -
[246]
The CEO's run SA \0/
|

Creamster
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 00:38:00 -
[247]
Originally by: RogerWilco I predict that SE and SAŠs death are comming soon, and that we will see trigger as a EVOL bisch soooon 
Interesting, so BoB's after SE as well? ___________ If you need further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact us again. We'll do all we can to help. |

Orb Lati
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 00:42:00 -
[248]
Originally by: Creamster
Originally by: RogerWilco I predict that SE and SAŠs death are comming soon, and that we will see trigger as a EVOL bisch soooon 
Interesting, so BoB's after SE as well?
Isnt SA and SE just the different sides of the same coin....only when they're not fighting each other of coarse 
Now the question becomes when SA starts lossing members will SE start seeing a corresponding increase? "We worship Strength because it is through strength that all other values are made possible" |

Blacklight
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 00:43:00 -
[249]
Originally by: JerrySpringer Don't be fooled, MC and BoB are +++ standing, enough said. MC never took contract on any BoB aligned organization.
EDIT: let me elaborate a bit: if MC were to be hostile to BoB or their associates, they'd have plenty to lose and little to win. BoB would definitely use that opportunity to kick MC about, and MC couldn't afford the bad press. So BoB keeps MC friendly and MC knows what's good for em.
No-one could afford it smart arse. As far as I know, there have only ever been two serious offers to hire MC to hit BoB and one of them was me.
All the rest of this tinfoilasshattery is just that, asshattery i.e. amusing but 99% wrong.
Eve Blacklight Style
|

Avernus
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 00:44:00 -
[250]
Originally by: Creamster
Originally by: RogerWilco I predict that SE and SAŠs death are comming soon, and that we will see trigger as a EVOL bisch soooon 
Interesting, so BoB's after SE as well?
I'd take anything said by others with a grain of salt when it comes to BoB. When the BoB CEOs post, then you know where you stand.
That said... I'm not in BoB.
Ex-JCoS, Ex-Diplomat, Ex-Councilor, Ex-CEO (posts no longer represent Firmus Ixion) |

Blacklight
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 00:45:00 -
[251]
Originally by: Creamster
Originally by: RogerWilco I predict that SE and SAŠs death are comming soon, and that we will see trigger as a EVOL bisch soooon 
Interesting, so BoB's after SE as well?
Why what difference does it make to you?
You're already -10 to us, your alliance diplomat has managed to alienate the entirety of the rest of the south and now you are clutching at straws by hoping the very people you fell out with last time your alliance destabilised the south are going to help you now or something??
Eve Blacklight Style
|

USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 00:48:00 -
[252]
Originally by: Avernus
Originally by: Creamster
Originally by: RogerWilco I predict that SE and SAŠs death are comming soon, and that we will see trigger as a EVOL bisch soooon 
Interesting, so BoB's after SE as well?
I'd take anything said by others with a grain of salt when it comes to BoB. When the BoB CEOs post, then you know where you stand.
That said... I'm not in BoB.
Avernus - thanks dude for making that statement very clear. this is what we need now more than ever.
Thanks Avernus.
USN
|

Avernus
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 00:53:00 -
[253]
Anytime USN.
Ex-JCoS, Ex-Diplomat, Ex-Councilor, Ex-CEO (posts no longer represent Firmus Ixion) |

Dalilah
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 00:57:00 -
[254]
Originally by: RogerWilco I predict that SE and SAŠs death are comming soon...
SoonÖ ? I want to see exact terms and Š 2-3 years accuracy will be good  ---
Ohhh... No tears, please. It's a waste of good suffering |

Draximus Cane
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 01:06:00 -
[255]
Originally by: Gronsak
Originally by: Eyeshadow
Originally by: Kantar Good luck Trig and Co.
But on a personal note :
Why MC as been hired for this war as well ??
I thought the honorable thing to do is sort it out the part involve and keep the rest out of it.
Two Alliance v One and involving Merc as well is a bit low, I hope whoever hiried MC will reconsider and bring a clean fight to them.
There is a quote that come to mind reading all this :
Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself.
This are my 50 pence.
We were hired, in part, for our large capital fleet to destroy hostile POS in FAT-6P. Yesterday we took 6 hostile Large towers into reinforced mode and have finished off 4 as of this moment. The remaining 2 will soon be taken out aswell
The empire war is always an accompaniment to one of our contracts and we rarely take a contract without an empire war as that is one of our bigger strengths.
The reasons, the whos, the whys etc are of little consequence to us and your definition of honour (i.e. fair fights) does not enter into ours. We are paid to do a job, and a job we will do. Why you consider someone hiring us for a specific job as "a bit low" is beyond me. Someone wanted something to doing. We are here to do it
Thanks
i would have the greatest repect for the MC if i could believe this. what if insted u got the convo from some guy to be hired to fight bob on SA side. would u guys of taken the contract.
if u are truly unbiased and isk dictates your enermys then i take my hat off to the MC. it shows that you are up to fighting anyone, even if greatly outnumbered. but if as i would suspect that you guys get offers to fight both sides yet you pick the easier option [i dont know much about the MC but i would assume this is the case. correct me if i am wrong] then i have no repect for you and u are just as bad as the other band wagon jumpers.
Incorrect as much as a post could ever be
We accept contracts that have most value to our organisation, we do not accept them on what terms others think we should
-------------------------------------------------
|

Creamster
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 01:20:00 -
[256]
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: Creamster
Originally by: RogerWilco I predict that SE and SAŠs death are comming soon, and that we will see trigger as a EVOL bisch soooon 
Interesting, so BoB's after SE as well?
Why what difference does it make to you?
You're already -10 to us, your alliance diplomat has managed to alienate the entirety of the rest of the south and now you are clutching at straws by hoping the very people you fell out with last time your alliance destabilised the south are going to help you now or something??
... or something. The SE is a very old alliance, lots of things have been done, i can only speak for a post-Cujo SE. And you should too. I don't remember when we tried to destabilize south, we've been on the defensive fighting against SA and few other aggressors since september 05. And that diplomat you're referring to, what's his name?
What i see here is you can't even tell the difference between alliances living in stain, what they stand for and what they're doing. But you're all so willing to declare them dead. Oh well you're not the first and won't be the last.
___________ If you need further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact us again. We'll do all we can to help. |

Zubenelgenubi
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 01:36:00 -
[257]
Quote: What i see here is you can't even tell the difference between alliances living in stain, what they stand for and what they're doing. But you're all so willing to declare them dead. Oh well you're not the first and won't be the last.
well said. Lot of people don't know what there talking about in here :)
|

Bared Bel'Medalt
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 01:41:00 -
[258]
Edited by: Bared Bel''Medalt on 07/02/2006 01:44:48
Originally by: Zubenelgenubi
Quote: What i see here is you can't even tell the difference between alliances living in stain, what they stand for and what they're doing. But you're all so willing to declare them dead. Oh well you're not the first and won't be the last.
well said. Lot of people don't know what there talking about in here :)
God damnit, i started a thread to find out what the hell people are talking about here! No one ones what the hell is going on down there but the people involved. Those of us who arent are just curious as all ****! Last time I had go round, I was leading a few small fleet ops agaisnt XB down in 4gq for SA... wtf is going on here! I cant take this kind of pressure, its driving em insane. By the way, when engaging some one who both outnumbers and out guns you, dont forget to bring a towel... ******************** Anything posted by this character is purely of my own invention, and does not reflect the views of my corp. In the event that something has anything, I'll post with my main |

Recluse XXX
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 04:45:00 -
[259]
Edited by: Recluse XXX on 07/02/2006 04:45:25
Originally by: Gronsak [i dont know much about the MC
Atleast you got one thing right in your stupid post....
On another note...its kinda funny to see a bought account that actually have been a member of the MC say that they dont know much about us....
//Rec
-------------- Edited by: sausage jockey on 01/02/2006 22:02:39 We will not give up until we have penetrated the rear entrance to Stain, we hope this will hurt SA to the point they start to cry.
|

ProphetGuru
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 04:59:00 -
[260]
Originally by: Avernus I'd take anything said by others with a grain of salt when it comes to BoB. When the BoB CEOs post, then you know where you stand.
Should be in the tutorial to be honest.
Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
|

Avernus
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 06:06:00 -
[261]
Originally by: ProphetGuru
Originally by: Avernus I'd take anything said by others with a grain of salt when it comes to BoB. When the BoB CEOs post, then you know where you stand.
Should be in the tutorial to be honest.
If it was in, many people would tend to skip that section.
Ex-JCoS, Ex-Diplomat, Ex-Councilor, Ex-CEO (posts no longer represent Firmus Ixion) |

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 06:25:00 -
[262]
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: JerrySpringer Don't be fooled, MC and BoB are +++ standing, enough said. MC never took contract on any BoB aligned organization.
EDIT: let me elaborate a bit: if MC were to be hostile to BoB or their associates, they'd have plenty to lose and little to win. BoB would definitely use that opportunity to kick MC about, and MC couldn't afford the bad press. So BoB keeps MC friendly and MC knows what's good for em.
No-one could afford it smart arse. As far as I know, there have only ever been two serious offers to hire MC to hit BoB and one of them was me.
All the rest of this tinfoilasshattery is just that, asshattery i.e. amusing but 99% wrong.
So what ur saying is that will charge crazy amounts of isk to take a contract on u, even though their charter states that they charge around 200 mil a corp. Still doesnt sound neutral to me. Care to elaborate?
So Far So Good....So What |

Estarriol
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 06:27:00 -
[263]
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx So what ur saying is that will charge crazy amounts of isk to take a contract on u, even though their charter states that they charge around 200 mil a corp. Still doesnt sound neutral to me. Care to elaborate?
They charge the amount that makes it worth it to them. Pure business sense.
Quote: ProphetGuru > we gonna Donkeypunch SA
|

Avernus
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 06:46:00 -
[264]
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx
So what ur saying is that will charge crazy amounts of isk to take a contract on u, even though their charter states that they charge around 200 mil a corp. Still doesnt sound neutral to me. Care to elaborate?
Basically, it's sound business economics. The harder the target, the higher the price; it doesn't make sense to charge a flat fee for all circumstances when you know the cost of doing business on your own end is going change depending on what you've been contracted for.
Example: (conjecture) When MC was hired by ISS for escort and protection during their most recent outpost deployment, one would expect the price of services rendered to be lower than a normal contract.. this would be due to the lower likelyhood of combat occuring. Everything has to be factored in.
In contrast, if a contract was to be put out on BoB, MC has no illusions as to wether their reputation is well earned. They are basically a hardened target. Charging the same fee to go after a noob corp or a veteran pvp outfit... doesn't make sense. Perhaps if BoB is to suffer some significant defeats and comes to be seen in a different light by MC, then the price would likely go down in the future.
Industrialists play the market on a regular basis; Mercenaries have their own market, and they have to treat it with similar respect if they want to be a viable entity.
PS. Not trying to speak on behalf of MC in any way here, just looking to clue someone in.
Ex-JCoS, Ex-Diplomat, Ex-Councilor, Ex-CEO (posts no longer represent Firmus Ixion) |

Ku'Gras
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 06:50:00 -
[265]
Originally by: Creamster
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: Creamster
Interesting, so BoB's after SE as well?
Why what difference does it make to you?
You're already -10 to us, your alliance diplomat has managed to alienate the entirety of the rest of the south and now you are clutching at straws by hoping the very people you fell out with last time your alliance destabilised the south are going to help you now or something??
... or something. The SE is a very old alliance, lots of things have been done, i can only speak for a post-Cujo SE. And you should too. I don't remember when we tried to destabilize south, we've been on the defensive fighting against SA and few other aggressors since september 05. And that diplomat you're referring to, what's his name?
What i see here is you can't even tell the difference between alliances living in stain, what they stand for and what they're doing. But you're all so willing to declare them dead. Oh well you're not the first and won't be the last.
If anyone have any interest in changing their standings better do that communication in game instead of throwing around accusations on forum.
|

FrioBebe
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 07:37:00 -
[266]
Originally by: Ku'Gras If anyone have any interest in changing their standings better do that communication in game instead of throwing around accusations on forum.
So declaring two alliances dead means, "Talk to me ingame, and you will be honored with positive standings"?
|

Draximus Cane
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 07:37:00 -
[267]
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: JerrySpringer Don't be fooled, MC and BoB are +++ standing, enough said. MC never took contract on any BoB aligned organization.
EDIT: let me elaborate a bit: if MC were to be hostile to BoB or their associates, they'd have plenty to lose and little to win. BoB would definitely use that opportunity to kick MC about, and MC couldn't afford the bad press. So BoB keeps MC friendly and MC knows what's good for em.
No-one could afford it smart arse. As far as I know, there have only ever been two serious offers to hire MC to hit BoB and one of them was me.
All the rest of this tinfoilasshattery is just that, asshattery i.e. amusing but 99% wrong.
So what ur saying is that will charge crazy amounts of isk to take a contract on u, even though their charter states that they charge around 200 mil a corp. Still doesnt sound neutral to me. Care to elaborate?
let me break it down for you
Quote: Generally speaking ,
- This word "generally" implies one size does not in fact fit all Quote: our prices range from 250-900 million ISK per week, per corp,
see our prices are not fixed at 250 mill, and I do belive the alliance of BoB contains more than one member Quote: depending on the targets
agin here we try to make clear the price may be different dependent on the target by using what we assume is an easy to use phrase "dependent on the target"
I am not sure if you are attempting to flame bait, or requesting a quote, if it is the latter, I suspect this isn't the best place to ask
Fly Safe
PS am I the only one that finds your name scary?
Drax
-------------------------------------------------
|

CopeLand
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 07:48:00 -
[268]
Originally by: ProphetGuru
Originally by: CopeLand after intelligence reports indicated bob was gonna wardec sa in few hours, a pre-strike was launched.
I've seen this posted a few times now. SA must have really crappy intel.... maybe Bared is still playing at politics. We seldom wardec anyone, we live in 0.0 .... it never does us any good to be honest.
SA believing we would attack them first without a word? pfft. I don't buy into that and I highly doubt any Stainers that have been around more then 2yrs would buy into it either. It's not how we operate... when we go off to fight someone we don't exactly keep it a secret.
Someone in SA has wound up this situation from the get go..... I wonder who that could be.
well that was the rumor and on several occasions have i heard from different sources, that this was a fact
|

CopeLand
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 07:50:00 -
[269]
Originally by: Riddlock
Originally by: CopeLand
Originally by: Foomanshoe My personal opinion
I dont see how SA didnt see Tribes making this stance. We were content to let you fight FIX, mostly because we felt we were allies with both of you pretty closely. FIX helped us in the G/IRON war and most of us used to be in SA. However when you declared on Bob and EM, you made it 1 ally against 3 allies.
You brought the fight from catch, to querious and delve, completely cutting off both our access points to empire with a very large warzone.
And to add to it, most of SA have never once respected the members of tribal souls. When we were in SA we got told we were carebears even while we were in fleets fighting G. (i have a chat log of a MASS person lecturing us about how we have to fight while she was in empire and we were currently in a gang fighting G). When we left SA said publically said we were just the fat and good riddens. And when we could no longer remain neutral SA said we were carebears and we could go screw ourselves.
Still though, alot of Tribes guys didnt like shooting old friends, and we were in talks with TRIGGER about pulling out of the war. SA used the talks and our temperary cease-fire while the talks went on to send a gang down to paragon to attack us. Thats why the talks ended.
If the only way for a mutual respect to form is through good old combat, then take the battle off the forums and onto eve. Tribals has a good reputation of being smack free. When we fight IMP and G and VC and SE, i think there are very few incidences of us smacktalking in-game or on the forums.
Im sorry that you feel betrayed.
See you in space.
1)tribals concerns in this matter were nonexistant if they had standings to fix, bob, and sa, what do they care if they have to pass through
tribal choose to enter this, whatever their reasons
2)some if not all tribal corps are old sa corps they left sa to protect their outpost and southern complexes and got a nap with g or some sort of a deal, they bailed out of that war
naturally at the time, some ppl were bound to react to this, some in negative manner
Keep talking about things that you have no clue copeland ,keep thinking we left to protect an outpost and how we napped G /Iron .We'll see how those will solve this thing .
ye i dont know nothing
cept for maybe that if i am nap with 3 x entities and they are attacking each other, i dont have to do anything
unless i really want to
its called choosing a side
gangi ŠTr vel
|

Ku'Gras
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 08:49:00 -
[270]
Originally by: FrioBebe
Originally by: Ku'Gras If anyone have any interest in changing their standings better do that communication in game instead of throwing around accusations on forum.
So declaring two alliances dead means, "Talk to me ingame, and you will be honored with positive standings"?
For the mentally challenged: If you are on hostile standings since earlier and believe there is a reason to change that then communicate with the appointed diplomat in-game. Same goes for all alliances.
I'm NOT saying there is a reason or even that any party (SE or BoB) wants to alter standings. My CEO said we are content with having them at negative and before that SE guy popped in here I was sure SE were happy and content with a negative standing. I'm saying convo between diplomats in-game > vague forum accusations.
|

FrioBebe
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 09:42:00 -
[271]
Originally by: Ku'Gras I'm saying convo between diplomats in-game > vague forum accusations.
Using words as "mentally challenged" does not fall under your umbrella of forum accusations.
Just out of curiosity, who are you referring to. SA, SE or =! BoB?
K tnx...
|

Trooper B99
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 09:52:00 -
[272]
As Drax says, the fee for a contract varys greatly from job to job and we have had people ask for quotes for hits on single corporations, alliances, pirate groups, single POS, multiple POS networks, individual pilots, individual pirates . . . the list goes on.
We have to vary our costing strategy to take these various factors into account as well as locations, client desires, specific goals hardware that needs to be used and indeed, who the target is.
As a base we generally use 250 mil/corp so as to filter some of the smaller clients who might make do with smaller, more affordable mercenary outfits who are more suitable to the job at hand.
Gronsak, for us to fight someone we generally need to be contacted with a serious, solid offer. We do not "jump on bandwagons" or take "the easiest option". We speak with serious potential clients in the same manner.
Wirykomi Team Racer - COLOSSUS Championships Year 106
|

Eyeshadow
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 10:00:00 -
[273]
Originally by: Gronsak i would have the greatest repect for the MC if i could believe this. what if insted u got the convo from some guy to be hired to fight bob on SA side. would u guys of taken the contract.
Irrelavant. No one approached us to take a contract on BOB on the side of SA.
Oh, and we dont take sides. We get paid to do a job. We were paid to declare war on SA and clean FAT of hostile POS. The fact that BOB + Exuro are in an empire war with SA is of little consequence and the contract was already negotiated days before SA commited suicide and declared on BOB.
Originally by: gransak if u are truly unbiased and isk dictates your enermys then i take my hat off to the MC. it shows that you are up to fighting anyone, even if greatly outnumbered. but if as i would suspect that you guys get offers to fight both sides yet you pick the easier option [i dont know much about the MC but i would assume this is the case. correct me if i am wrong] then i have no repect for you and u are just as bad as the other band wagon jumpers.
Yes we were extremely bored and thought we would:
a) waste 400mil on strontium killing POS's that have no relevance whatsoever to the MC b) Put 20bil or so worth of hardware on the line for people that mean nothing outside of a contract c) Wake up at 3:30am to finish off hostile POS that like i said, mean nothing to the MC out of contract
Please be quiet. If we had merely declared war on SA then i would say you have a basis for an argument that we are jumping on the bandwagon Which, by the way, would still be rubbish because the MC doesnt do such a thing, we have no reason to.
As for us and BOB being friends, yes that is very true. It is mutually beneficial at the moment. The MC gets somewhere to NPC + Mine whilst off contract and BOB get "housekeepers" whilst we are there. Having 150 more PVPers in their space isnt exactly going to do them any harm is it?
Would we take a contract on BOB? Convo me and make me an offer, preferably better than the one and only offer we've had before, and we will see 
P.S. This tinhatfoolery has got to stop. Its rediculous
My Latest Vid (16/11/05) |

Dalilah
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 10:07:00 -
[274]
Originally by: Ku'Gras I'm NOT saying there is a reason or even that any party (SE or BoB) wants to alter standings. My CEO said we are content with having them at negative and before that SE guy popped in here I was sure SE were happy and content with a negative standing.
Exactly. BTW BoB isn't our primary, secondary or even tretiary target but it's a true that we have mutual negative standings and enjoy good fights. We were involved in that conflict due BoB invasion in Stain and simply fighting to secure our region. That's all. ---
Ohhh... No tears, please. It's a waste of good suffering |

Seleene
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 10:13:00 -
[275]
Originally by: Avernus
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx
So what ur saying is that will charge crazy amounts of isk to take a contract on u, even though their charter states that they charge around 200 mil a corp. Still doesnt sound neutral to me. Care to elaborate?
Basically, it's sound business economics. The harder the target, the higher the price; it doesn't make sense to charge a flat fee for all circumstances when you know the cost of doing business on your own end is going change depending on what you've been contracted for.
Example: (conjecture) When MC was hired by ISS for escort and protection during their most recent outpost deployment, one would expect the price of services rendered to be lower than a normal contract.. this would be due to the lower likelyhood of combat occuring. Everything has to be factored in.
In contrast, if a contract was to be put out on BoB, MC has no illusions as to wether their reputation is well earned. They are basically a hardened target. Charging the same fee to go after a noob corp or a veteran pvp outfit... doesn't make sense. Perhaps if BoB is to suffer some significant defeats and comes to be seen in a different light by MC, then the price would likely go down in the future.
Industrialists play the market on a regular basis; Mercenaries have their own market, and they have to treat it with similar respect if they want to be a viable entity.
PS. Not trying to speak on behalf of MC in any way here, just looking to clue someone in.
Avernus, first of all, very cool name. Sounds... 'Hellish'. 
Your post is actually very, very good. We scale our payments according to the "hardness" of a target or what the client expects of us. In some cases, our rates vary from week to week for even the same client depending on thier goals.
As to BoB - I've made this point in the past which is that we have never been offered a serious contract on BoB. Not once. By serious, I mean someone with concrete goals, a plan that uses us to our potential and the ISK to back it up.
Up until recently, the same question with regard to, "Why hasn't MC ever attacked [5]?" kept coming up. When a client with an agenda, realistic expectations and a good wallet showed up, we took the job.
The problem is this: the MC is still a small organization. We are the shock troops / Marine Corps of EVE. That's how we model ourselves and sell. We always make this very clear to any client - we can do a lot for you, we might even be able to tip the balance in a greater conflict, we can go in and do a hell of a lot of damage against a target, but we aren't an occupation army or an after-war police force.
Bottom line: if someone wants the MC to hit BoB, you had better have a serious wallet and a serious plan. To be quite honest, with the number of offers we get, I'm not wasting our time on a contract with no other goal than to "kill a lot of them" when we have other options with much clearer goals and definative results.  -
See the MC in action in our latest vid! Sig Hijack!11 - Imaran  |

Lowa
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 10:15:00 -
[276]
Originally by: Recluse XXX Edited by: Recluse XXX on 07/02/2006 04:45:25
Originally by: Gronsak i dont know much about the MC
On another note...its kinda funny to see a bought account that actually have been a member of the MC say that they dont know much about us....
Rec, I believe you have finally pwned someone... 
Thinfoilasshattery = Best word for a loong time!
/LOWA
NSN - Forcing EVE reviewers to mine since 2003! |

Demitri Klashnikov
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 10:50:00 -
[277]
Originally by: Lowa
Originally by: Recluse XXX Edited by: Recluse XXX on 07/02/2006 04:45:25
Originally by: Gronsak i dont know much about the MC
On another note...its kinda funny to see a bought account that actually have been a member of the MC say that they dont know much about us....
Rec, I believe you have finally pwned someone... 
Thinfoilasshattery = Best word for a loong time!
/LOWA
but.... does it beat "Back door shenanigans"? -----------------------------------------------
|

Blacklight
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 11:04:00 -
[278]
Originally by: Eyeshadow P.S. This tinhatfoolery has got to stop. Its rediculous
It's 'tinfoilasshattery' mate 'tinhatfoolery' just doesn't have the same ring to it 
Eve Blacklight Style
|

Kisses
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 11:06:00 -
[279]
Originally by: Righteous Fury
Originally by: USN CVN73 Its becoming more suspicious that perhaps several fix have bob accounts and that those bob accounts were used by fix to make threats that bob will wardeck sa if sa continued to engage fix.
Seems like most of BOB were surprised at the SA forward strike than the wardeck. With this said it has become clear that BoB accounts are being run by Fix and potentially have stirred more conflict than nessesary.
There r a hand full of players that are trying to dictate a direction eve should take. Sadly - i think many entities are being moved like pawns on a chess board. Unfortunatly BoB may have been forced to make a move without true understanding what has occured in the last week.
for those sides involved in this conflict may the servers be sound and may the pilots be compitant. Events will unfold and all entities involved will go forward regardless.
cheers USN
Okay, seriously, just stop. You have surpassed the bounds of stupidity into the uncharted realm of utter moronic retardism. Someone please get rid of this assclown.
Strike a cord of truth did he?
And besides you Both are going to Sit There and tell us that being in two different Alliances isnt possible or feasible?
Ohh wait just like BOB and FIX dont have any alts that post on these forums..
Of COURSE its possible M8's
|

Eyeshadow
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 12:09:00 -
[280]
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: Eyeshadow P.S. This tinhatfoolery has got to stop. Its rediculous
It's 'tinfoilasshattery' mate 'tinhatfoolery' just doesn't have the same ring to it 
ahh sorry mate, will get it right next time
Whatever its referred to, its getting a bit out of hand. Paranoia has swept through EVE. Everyone is conspiring with everyone else and every action taken in the game is a conspiracy against/for someone
Jesus 
My Latest Vid (16/11/05) |

KingAc
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 12:30:00 -
[281]
Yet again the power of ninja Kladdkaka/MC ones more take control of a most ebil E-O post \o/
|

Gravis
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 12:39:00 -
[282]
Originally by: Eyeshadow P.S. This tinhatfoolery has got to stop. Its rediculous
No. This kladdkaka bla bla bla has to stop. Its getting rediculous.
And gronsak, read RecŠs post again and again and again
-----------------------------------------------
|

Garia666
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 12:42:00 -
[283]
Edited by: Garia666 on 07/02/2006 12:42:34 Well after teh FAT Operation.. SA have gain back allot of respect and. I can only say.. good luck .. and Hang in there ---------------------------------------------- CCP [ Cash Collecting Program ] Slogan : The more Skilzz the more Moneh .. ---------------------------------------------- |

Seleene
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 12:46:00 -
[284]
Originally by: Garia666 Well after teh FAT Operation.. SA have gain back allot of respect and. I can only say.. good luck .. and Hang in there
After this weekend, FAT is firmly in the hands of FIX. What are you talking about? -
See the MC in action in our latest vid! Sig Hijack!11 - Imaran  |

Eyeshadow
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 12:51:00 -
[285]
Originally by: Garia666 Edited by: Garia666 on 07/02/2006 12:42:34 Well after teh FAT Operation.. SA have gain back allot of respect and. I can only say.. good luck .. and Hang in there
What FAT operation? You mean how it took SA + allies 1.5months to take control of that system, and FIX + allies (BOB, MC + FIX) 24 hours to regain it?
Yeah SA should really be respected for such a grand achievement  
My Latest Vid (16/11/05) |

Wizie
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:04:00 -
[286]
Originally by: Eyeshadow
Originally by: Garia666 Edited by: Garia666 on 07/02/2006 12:42:34 Well after teh FAT Operation.. SA have gain back allot of respect and. I can only say.. good luck .. and Hang in there
What FAT operation? You mean how it took SA + allies 1.5months to take control of that system, and FIX + allies (BOB, MC + FIX) 24 hours to regain it?
Yeah SA should really be respected for such a grand achievement  
It was a grand achievement. After being beat down by G/IRON for a month SA reorganised and took back a system from a determined alliance that had been there for several months.
Infact it was a bigger achievement than yours since SA only had a few days or less to setup to hold FAT.
|

ZedLey
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:10:00 -
[287]
Edited by: ZedLey on 07/02/2006 13:12:53
Originally by: Eyeshadow
Originally by: Garia666 Edited by: Garia666 on 07/02/2006 12:42:34 Well after teh FAT Operation.. SA have gain back allot of respect and. I can only say.. good luck .. and Hang in there
What FAT operation? You mean how it took SA + allies 1.5months to take control of that system, and FIX + allies (BOB, MC + FIX) 24 hours to regain it?
Yeah SA should really be respected for such a grand achievement  
SA would of had FAT if they wouldnt of been gangbanged against. And tbh SA deserves the respect that they took FAT after beeing hurt badly by IRON/G war
|

Fred0
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:13:00 -
[288]
Edited by: Fred0 on 07/02/2006 13:13:42 Why the **** would anyone ever hire MC to fight BOB? Right now it would be soo counterproductive in the long run it's not even funny.
The only one I would ever contemplate hiring against BOB is GH-SC tbh, and not to rob it but with the aim to split it which probably is impossible now anyway.
|

Troubadour
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:14:00 -
[289]
Originally by: USN CVN73
Originally by: Gronsak
Originally by: USN CVN73 play this game.laugh at some insane thought. the game be Real life . Wont you agree? Forums are supposed to be serious. Damn CNN...
just useing your last post as a example of selective quating. lol its funney tbh. usually not that far. but u get what i mean, dont selective quote to put ur point across.
I AM NOT A ENGLISH MAJOR... Thank you for the correction!!!
But if u want to be critical hehe your spelling is not perfect "useing" hmm. hehe just wanted to be funny!
USN
Who let USN out of his cage? It's time for your fishheads USN, be a good boy now.
|

Kazim
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:14:00 -
[290]
Originally by: Eyeshadow
Originally by: Garia666 Edited by: Garia666 on 07/02/2006 12:42:34 Well after teh FAT Operation.. SA have gain back allot of respect and. I can only say.. good luck .. and Hang in there
What FAT operation? You mean how it took SA + allies 1.5months to take control of that system, and FIX + allies (BOB, MC + FIX) 24 hours to regain it?
Yeah SA should really be respected for such a grand achievement  
Now now, dont smack us MC it doesnt suit you. After we got decced by all of you I dont think we could have hold on to fat even if we tried, so we didnt 
|

Smithers
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:17:00 -
[291]
No offense to MC, but Selenee, you should keep a tighter leash on Eyeshadow, he seems a bit smack happy and not as professional and respectful as the majority of your members. 
|

Taurequis
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:20:00 -
[292]
Edited by: Taurequis on 07/02/2006 13:24:18
Originally by: Eyeshadow
What FAT operation? You mean how it took SA + allies 1.5months to take control of that system, and FIX + allies (BOB, MC + FIX) 24 hours to regain it?
Yeah SA should really be respected for such a grand achievement  
Makes me wonder somewhat when the galaxies most well known merc group which often trades on it's neutrality talks about helping it's allies.
Can we assume from that statement that Bob or FIX employed you? (kinda obvious really).
Or is your employer going to be a bit ****ed off that your wasting time shooting stations SA have no intention of using.
Sorry for the hostile-ish tone, the whole when is as merc job actually a merc job and not just an easy excuse for a war dec issue has been bugging me for a while.
Taurequis
edit - for factual error.
|

BlackRain
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:28:00 -
[293]
Originally by: Wizie
It was a grand achievement. After being beat down by G/IRON for a month SA reorganised and took back a system from a determined alliance that had been there for several months.
It just strikes me as funny because just a couple of days ago the forum was full of SA members telling us no one has ever beat them in combat, nnd now getting beaten down by G/IRON is being used as their defense. In the Big Picture, that does not compute.
-------------------
- |

Taurequis
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:31:00 -
[294]
Your quoting a cosmic fusion guy. Plus you obviously know you dont believe everything you read on the forums eh. 
|

Eyeshadow
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:34:00 -
[295]
Originally by: Smithers No offense to MC, but Selenee, you should keep a tighter leash on Eyeshadow, he seems a bit smack happy and not as professional and respectful as the majority of your members. 
smack or not, i cant believe any1 could possibly respect SA for taking 6 weeks to a station that took us 24 hrs to retake. Whether we gang banged them or not, SA had their fair share of allies when they took it in the first place.
My Latest Vid (16/11/05) |

Smithers
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:40:00 -
[296]
Originally by: Eyeshadow
Originally by: Smithers No offense to MC, but Selenee, you should keep a tighter leash on Eyeshadow, he seems a bit smack happy and not as professional and respectful as the majority of your members. 
smack or not, i cant believe any1 could possibly respect SA for taking 6 weeks to a station that took us 24 hrs to retake. Whether we gang banged them or not, SA had their fair share of allies when they took it in the first place.
The point is, that those 6 weeks have nothing to do with you. You arent employed to smack for your contractor aswell you know. 
|

BlackRain
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:41:00 -
[297]
Originally by: Taurequis Plus you obviously know you dont believe everything you read on the forums eh. 
It is indeed a bit counterproductive to play forum detective & try and make logical deduction according to what people say on forums AND then post the quoted sentence. Eh?
You better stop... -------------------
- |

Incinate
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:42:00 -
[298]
Originally by: Eyeshadow smack or not, i cant believe any1 could possibly respect SA for taking 6 weeks to a station that took us 24 hrs to retake. Whether we gang banged them or not, SA had their fair share of allies when they took it in the first place.
Word.
This space for rent |

Wizie
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:42:00 -
[299]
Originally by: Eyeshadow
Originally by: Smithers No offense to MC, but Selenee, you should keep a tighter leash on Eyeshadow, he seems a bit smack happy and not as professional and respectful as the majority of your members. 
smack or not, i cant believe any1 could possibly respect SA for taking 6 weeks to a station that took us 24 hrs to retake. Whether we gang banged them or not, SA had their fair share of allies when they took it in the first place.
It is smack.
And it is noteworthy because SA had to take out a well established alliance from a system where they had been for a while.
You took out an alliance that had almost no time to settle there. And in fact didnt attempt to hold it either.
|

Taurequis
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:44:00 -
[300]
Originally by: BlackRain
Originally by: Taurequis Plus you obviously know you dont believe everything you read on the forums eh. 
It is indeed a bit counterproductive to play forum detective & try and make logical deduction according to what people say on forums AND then post the quoted sentence. Eh?
You better stop...
= laughing at myself as well as you. Sorry for not making my sarcasm more obvious.
Best Regards,
Taurequis
|

Wizie
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:44:00 -
[301]
Originally by: BlackRain Edited by: BlackRain on 07/02/2006 13:28:09
Originally by: Wizie
It was a grand achievement. After being beat down by G/IRON for a month SA reorganised and took back a system from a determined alliance that had been there for several months.
It just strikes me as funny because just a couple of days ago the forum was full of SA members telling us no one has ever beat them in combat, and now getting beaten down by G/IRON is being used as their defense. In the Big Picture, that does not compute.
Getting beat down and getting beat is different.
G/IRON have beaten BOB in plenty of fights. But have they defeated BOB as an entity? NO.
|

Eyeshadow
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:50:00 -
[302]
Edited by: Eyeshadow on 07/02/2006 13:50:45
Originally by: Smithers The point is, that those 6 weeks have nothing to do with you. You arent employed to smack for your contractor aswell you know. 
Sorry that doesnt make any sense to me. The previous 6 weeks indeed had very little to do with us (just as it had naff all to do with Five i might add) but that doesnt stop me voicing my opinion on the situation does it (just as you are voicing yours). And the contractor has nothing to do with whether i smack talk or not.
Quote: You took out an alliance that had almost no time to settle there. And in fact didnt attempt to hold it either.
The first sentence i can agree with
The second, however, basically proves that my point is correct. They didnt even bother to try and defend that which they bragged so much about taking so why the hell should anyone respect them for anything to do with it?
My Latest Vid (16/11/05) |

FrioBebe
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:55:00 -
[303]
Originally by: BlackRain It is indeed a bit counterproductive to play forum detective & try and make logical deduction according to what people say on forums AND then post the quoted sentence. Eh? You better stop...
Howcome YOUR version of the truth is more true, than the other debateant version of the truth? And by that somehow you are stating BoB is allways right and everyone else is wrong. If they are not wrong they are smacktalkers or "retards".
I can't really see that quoting, and asking questions of a statement somehow qualifies for the title "Forum detective"
|

merketbeehatch
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 13:57:00 -
[304]
Originally by: Eyeshadow Edited by: Eyeshadow on 07/02/2006 13:50:45
Originally by: Smithers The point is, that those 6 weeks have nothing to do with you. You arent employed to smack for your contractor aswell you know. 
Sorry that doesnt make any sense to me. The previous 6 weeks indeed had very little to do with us (just as it had naff all to do with Five i might add) but that doesnt stop me voicing my opinion on the situation does it (just as you are voicing yours). And the contractor has nothing to do with whether i smack talk or not.
Quote: You took out an alliance that had almost no time to settle there. And in fact didnt attempt to hold it either.
The first sentence i can agree with
The second, however, basically proves that my point is correct. They didnt even bother to try and defend that which they bragged so much about taking so why the hell should anyone respect them for anything to do with it?
Why should anyone respect you for taking it back with bob's help?
|

Hans Roaming
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 14:01:00 -
[305]
Originally by: Eyeshadow
What FAT operation? You mean how it took SA + allies 1.5months to take control of that system, and FIX + allies (BOB, MC + FIX) 24 hours to regain it?
Yeah SA should really be respected for such a grand achievement  
To be fair the Catch campaign was not just to take FAT but was the occupation of Catch from a larger (at the start) and determined foe. V2 was taken very near the beginning and after one attempt to take 5-n that was repulsed very succesfully by FIX a second attempt was made on 5-n which saw it fall in a week. After that the battle for FAT began in earnest as opposed to being the enemy supression / harrassment exercise it had been before. A week of the fiercest sustained fighting I have ever seen resulted in allied forces taking the system, considering our opponent threw all they had into the battle then personally I feel it is an achievement.
Over the weekend SA was facing BoB + FIX + MC + Exuro Mortis + Tribal Souls + SE + The Triad, is it any wonder that FAT fell within 24 hours? With SA forces in Stain facing the excession that they do then taking back FAT would have been simply a clinical exercise in taking down the POS and claiming sov.
President Huzzah Federation
Be all you can be, join the Huzzah Armed Forces today! |

Eyeshadow
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 14:04:00 -
[306]
Originally by: merketbeehatch Why should anyone respect you for taking it back with bob's help?
I neither ask for, nor require, anyone's respect in this game for my, or the MC's action.
My Latest Vid (16/11/05) |

BlackRain
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 14:06:00 -
[307]
Originally by: FrioBebe
Howcome YOUR version of the truth is more true, than the other debateant version of the truth?
I'm sorry but I have no clue what you're talking about. I have offered no "versions of truth" here.
Quote:
And by that somehow you are stating BoB is allways right and everyone else is wrong. If they are not wrong they are smacktalkers or "retards".
Same applies here. Plus that I've not called anyone smacktalker or a retard. Elaborate, please.
Quote:
I can't really see that quoting, and asking questions of a statement somehow qualifies for the title "Forum detective"
Read up.
-------------------
- |

FrioBebe
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 14:18:00 -
[308]
Originally by: BlackRain
I'm sorry but I have no clue what you're talking about. I have offered no "versions of truth" here.
YOU as in BoB.
Originally by: BlackRain
Same applies here. Plus that I've not called anyone smacktalker or a retard. Elaborate, please.
Same applies here.
Originally by: BlackRain
Read up.
indeed.
|

Xantina
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 14:18:00 -
[309]
I fail to detect any truth here. All I see is opinions - sometimes more like wishful thinking. From my point of view the problem SA have with the forums right now is that there is too much SA smack brought forward with too much enthusiasm. And at some point, you started to believe your own propaganda. Which might not always be as true as you would wish.
|

Seleene
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 14:59:00 -
[310]
TBH, we would have done our job in FAT with or without the help of BoB. In fact, the majority of the ships holding the 'line' in FAT this weekend were FIX with a smattering of MC pilots. BoB were running all over the place looking for fights from what I heard & saw, while our capital fleet did the job we'd been hired to do before BoB even got involved in this.
SA and everyone else can say all they want, but this crap about them not even trying to keep FAT was a huge shock to many of us considering the way it was paraded about as a victory prior to this week.
We went in this weekend ready for the fight of our lives. We fully expected SA to fight to keep what was "thiers". It didn't happen. Some of you may be slamming Eye for smacking, but all he's really doing is voicing frustrations about the fact that we were expecting a big fight and didn't get one. -
See the MC in action in our latest vid! Sig Hijack!11 - Imaran  |

Smithers
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:07:00 -
[311]
Originally by: Seleene We went in this weekend ready for the fight of our lives. We fully expected SA to fight to keep what was "thiers". It didn't happen. Some of you may be slamming Eye for smacking, but all he's really doing is voicing frustrations about the fact that we were expecting a big fight and didn't get one.
Problem as i see it anyway for a merc organisation, to be smaking who you are contracted against is counter-productive as they will be lessing willing to purchase your services aswell maybe in the future? And if you keep doing it to everyone your contracted against, your employer list will get smaller and smaller. After all the enemy might be willing to hire you in the future, if he see's you are skileld (which you are) and dont smack them.
Would you want to hire someone who smacks your alliance?
I hope you can see where im coming from 
|

R4d1o4ct1v3
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:08:00 -
[312]
Go SA  Nice knowing you FIX and Tribal  ------------------- DISCLAIMER: All opinions in this post are the opinions af a week old, half eaten sandwitch and do in no way reflect the opinions of anybody within a 10km radius of the Eiffel towe |

Mauxir
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:11:00 -
[313]
Originally by: Seleene TBH, we would have done our job in FAT with or without the help of BoB. In fact, the majority of the ships holding the 'line' in FAT this weekend were FIX with a smattering of MC pilots. BoB were running all over the place looking for fights from what I heard & saw, while our capital fleet did the job we'd been hired to do before BoB even got involved in this.
SA and everyone else can say all they want, but this crap about them not even trying to keep FAT was a huge shock to many of us considering the way it was paraded about as a victory prior to this week.
We went in this weekend ready for the fight of our lives. We fully expected SA to fight to keep what was "thiers". It didn't happen. Some of you may be slamming Eye for smacking, but all he's really doing is voicing frustrations about the fact that we were expecting a big fight and didn't get one.
OK, now strategy is not my forte but Ill give it a go to explain to you why we didnt try to hold FAT.
Now this might come to you as a shocker but when you are outnumbered as much as we are you have to pick your fights and mostly fight those you stand a reasonable chance of winning. This is not the case with FAT.
You saying that you could have done this alone? Maybe you could maybe you couldnt. But even if we tried to stop you do you really thing all the other wagoneers would just stand by and let us duke it out? I think not.
Now my heart is really breaking because you didnt get fun fights over the weekend but if you want fun fights dont take "bandwagon" contracts.
See you in space.
|

Wizie
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:19:00 -
[314]
Originally by: Seleene TBH, we would have done our job in FAT with or without the help of BoB. In fact, the majority of the ships holding the 'line' in FAT this weekend were FIX with a smattering of MC pilots. BoB were running all over the place looking for fights from what I heard & saw, while our capital fleet did the job we'd been hired to do before BoB even got involved in this.
SA and everyone else can say all they want, but this crap about them not even trying to keep FAT was a huge shock to many of us considering the way it was paraded about as a victory prior to this week.
We went in this weekend ready for the fight of our lives. We fully expected SA to fight to keep what was "thiers". It didn't happen. Some of you may be slamming Eye for smacking, but all he's really doing is voicing frustrations about the fact that we were expecting a big fight and didn't get one.
Guess its ok to smack as long as you are voicing frustrations then.
I'm sure you are aware that SA don't have the capital ships alone to challenge yours.
|

pshepherd
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:19:00 -
[315]
Originally by: R4d1o4ct1v3 Go SA  Nice knowing you FIX and Tribal 
um, FIX and Tribal are going to be fine.... ?
============== This is a sig O RLY? - Imaran I've only done 4 hours of Tools for 2D graphics, give me a few weeks and i'll be cool, really. |

Garia666
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:22:00 -
[316]
Originally by: Eyeshadow
Originally by: Garia666 Edited by: Garia666 on 07/02/2006 12:42:34 Well after teh FAT Operation.. SA have gain back allot of respect and. I can only say.. good luck .. and Hang in there
What FAT operation? You mean how it took SA + allies 1.5months to take control of that system, and FIX + allies (BOB, MC + FIX) 24 hours to regain it?
Yeah SA should really be respected for such a grand achievement  
Well for your INFO i was there to make it happen.. And as former SE i can say things have changed. Even true enemies can come together and show respect to eachother. Wich has happend.
---------------------------------------------- CCP [ Cash Collecting Program ] Slogan : The more Skilzz the more Moneh .. ---------------------------------------------- |

Taurequis
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:24:00 -
[317]
Originally by: Seleene we'd been hired to do before BoB even got involved in this.
So your saying that before Fix got Bob involved to try and stop the war they had placed a contract with MC to continue it?
Taurequis
|

Seleene
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:25:00 -
[318]
Originally by: Mauxir
Originally by: Seleene TBH, we would have done our job in FAT with or without the help of BoB. In fact, the majority of the ships holding the 'line' in FAT this weekend were FIX with a smattering of MC pilots. BoB were running all over the place looking for fights from what I heard & saw, while our capital fleet did the job we'd been hired to do before BoB even got involved in this.
SA and everyone else can say all they want, but this crap about them not even trying to keep FAT was a huge shock to many of us considering the way it was paraded about as a victory prior to this week.
We went in this weekend ready for the fight of our lives. We fully expected SA to fight to keep what was "thiers". It didn't happen. Some of you may be slamming Eye for smacking, but all he's really doing is voicing frustrations about the fact that we were expecting a big fight and didn't get one.
OK, now strategy is not my forte but Ill give it a go to explain to you why we didnt try to hold FAT.
Now this might come to you as a shocker but when you are outnumbered as much as we are you have to pick your fights and mostly fight those you stand a reasonable chance of winning. This is not the case with FAT.
You saying that you could have done this alone? Maybe you could maybe you couldnt. But even if we tried to stop you do you really thing all the other wagoneers would just stand by and let us duke it out? I think not.
Now my heart is really breaking because you didnt get fun fights over the weekend but if you want fun fights dont take "bandwagon" contracts.
See you in space.
Not disagreeing with much of this except to say that BoB jumped on our bandwagon, not the other way around.  -
See the MC in action in our latest vid! Sig Hijack!11 - Imaran  |

CopeLand
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:33:00 -
[319]
Originally by: Eyeshadow
is of little consequence and the contract was already negotiated days before SA commited suicide and declared on BOB.
now for those interested in the subject, and have bothered to read through all the usual flaming, trolling and abuse.. and are infact interested in facts.. especially me and some individuals earlier in this thread talking about intelligence reports
this quite clearly must be the quote of the year
|

Hans Roaming
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:36:00 -
[320]
Originally by: Seleene SA and everyone else can say all they want, but this crap about them not even trying to keep FAT was a huge shock to many of us considering the way it was paraded about as a victory prior to this week.
We went in this weekend ready for the fight of our lives. We fully expected SA to fight to keep what was "thiers". It didn't happen. Some of you may be slamming Eye for smacking, but all he's really doing is voicing frustrations about the fact that we were expecting a big fight and didn't get one.
As a rough guide to available combatants on either side FIX + MC probably gets equivalence to SA and you were concentrated in FAT. When looking at the map all one could see were strings of camps into and inside SA space from the other factions arrayed against SA. The non FIX + MC factions added up and involved in SA space probably amount to a 2-2.5 advantage against SA and so they have to by necessity fight a gorilla war against their opponents as large set piece battles will put them at a huge disadvantage.
As they are largely going to be supplied off their capitol and not their income as opposed to their enemies then keeping ships alive has a higher priority than their enemies. These factors combined with the fact that an SA fleet would have to fight set piece battles against an opponent that out numbered them >2:1 before they even run the gauntlet of a prepared and entrenched enemy in FAT would have made such an attempt an exercise in futility at best.
They lost FAT, they would have lost FAT anyway if they tried to save it, this way SA saved a huge loss of ships from making the attempt.
We employed a similar method for taking 5-n, SA + KOAS would invest FAT and Querilous whilst Huzzah would put everything it had into sealing off 5-n and setting up the POS. No doubt FIX command came to the same conclusions as SA did when faced with a similar problem.
President Huzzah Federation
Be all you can be, join the Huzzah Armed Forces today! |

Hans Roaming
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:40:00 -
[321]
Originally by: Taurequis
Originally by: Seleene we'd been hired to do before BoB even got involved in this.
So your saying that before Fix got Bob involved to try and stop the war they had placed a contract with MC to continue it?
Taurequis
It would be extremly ironic if the contract had been placed before Orc A made his additional demands and MC + FIX would have gone into FAT, breaking the terms of the ceasfire anyway. 
President Huzzah Federation
Be all you can be, join the Huzzah Armed Forces today! |

Macsine
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:42:00 -
[322]
Edited by: Macsine on 07/02/2006 15:43:02
Originally by: Taurequis
Originally by: Seleene we'd been hired to do before BoB even got involved in this.
So your saying that before Fix got Bob involved to try and stop the war they had placed a contract with MC to continue it?
Taurequis
I'm too lazy to look for it now so I'm paraphrasing: I remember a fixian stating that SA breaking a ceasefire agreement didn't come as a surprise, merely the short time it took - 24 hours instead of a week. Maybe that would be an explanation ?
|

Wizie
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:42:00 -
[323]
Originally by: CopeLand
Originally by: Eyeshadow
is of little consequence and the contract was already negotiated days before SA commited suicide and declared on BOB.
now for those interested in the subject, and have bothered to read through all the usual flaming, trolling and abuse.. and are infact interested in facts.. especially me and some individuals earlier in this thread talking about intelligence reports
this quite clearly must be the quote of the year
Or claim of the year.
Anyhow expecting SA to engage in FAT with a large fleet was silly from the get go. With the number of entities fighting SA in that area, it would have been a nightmare to move a fleet of any decent size around. Or even more so to reinforce it. The roaming BOB fleets would have made sure of that. Exuro and the FIX alt ASUYA and lot.
Instead it seems the MC like any other entity are unhappy that they might have to work at getting fights. Yay for npc stations in 0.0 Just glad that BOB havent sent a gigantic fleet down to do the same. They either don't care to beat down on an already outnumbered foe or know that bringing a capitalship/BS fleet would do little but frustrate the pilots flying them.
|

Wizie
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:44:00 -
[324]
Originally by: Macsine Edited by: Macsine on 07/02/2006 15:43:02
Originally by: Taurequis
Originally by: Seleene we'd been hired to do before BoB even got involved in this.
So your saying that before Fix got Bob involved to try and stop the war they had placed a contract with MC to continue it?
Taurequis
I'm too lazy to look for it now so I'm paraphrasing: I remember a fixian stating that SA breaking a ceasefire agreement didn't come as a surprise, merely the short time it took - 24 hours instead of a week. Maybe that would be an explanation ?
Not an explanation, more like an attempted justification.
|

BlackRain
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 15:47:00 -
[325]
Originally by: FrioBebe Edited by: FrioBebe on 07/02/2006 14:40:19
Originally by: BlackRain
I'm sorry but I have no clue what you're talking about. I have offered no "versions of truth" here.
YOU as in BoB.
First of all, you need to understand that I'm talking as a person. My views are my views, and I'm not some collective diplomatic voice of BoB.
Originally by: BlackRain
It is indeed a bit counterproductive to play forum detective & try and make logical deduction according to what people say on forums AND then post the quoted sentence. Eh?
Dear little friend. How can you say that another persons reasoning is wrong, if you do not claim to hold the "right truth"? I'm not sure i understand you fully, when you say you have not offered any versions of the truth. What are you talking about?
And now it appears you're simply trying to be smarter and tougher than you really are. Patronising rarely works when you don't know how to do it right - or have the ability to back it up. You apparently can't do it right nor do you have the credibility to do it, so stop. Please.
I have not presented any "right truths" here nor even expressed my views in lenght. All I did was laugh at the way SA's "getting beaten up by G/IRON" got transformed from "we never got beaten up" into "hey, we did good considering we got beaten up".
Then I continued to point out that playing forum detective and making conclusions based on what people type on these forums is a bit silly - and even counterproductive when the poster himself said that "you can't believe what people write on these forums". Then, enter FrioBebe and incoherent rambling... I mean seriously, wtf are you talking about? That rambling sounds more like some freshman philosophy student on mushrooms.
Originally by: FrioBebe
Originally by: BlackRain
Same applies here. Plus that I've not called anyone smacktalker or a retard. Elaborate, please.
Same applies here.
k...
Upto this post I seriously haven't called anyone a smacktalker or a retard in this thread. Now, however, I'm compelled to do so.
Maybe it's better to stop trying to talk with you because you clearly are trying to argue an entirely different point from entirely different universe. Bye. -------------------
- |

Macsine
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 16:12:00 -
[326]
Originally by: Wizie
Originally by: Macsine
I'm too lazy to look for it now so I'm paraphrasing: I remember a fixian stating that SA breaking a ceasefire agreement didn't come as a surprise, merely the short time it took - 24 hours instead of a week. Maybe that would be an explanation ?
Not an explanation, more like an attempted justification.
I'm not in the business of justifying anything. I merely find the chain of events highly entertaining. Consider this:
1. Someone, let's call him Meekri (name altered) starts a shooting incident within fix and attempts to start a civil war. The attempt fails rather badly and said individual makes a run for SA space. At that time FIX is friendly towards SA. 2. SA shelters the above individual against FIX despite repeated protests from FIX and altho FIX placed a bounty on "Meekri". 3. SA pilots trespass into FIX space, some shooting incidents take place. 4. A merc corp decided to wardec FIX and cut off the trade routes to empire space. 5. FIX is closing their border to SA by setting them to neutral. Diplomatic attempts to resolve this are rejected by Orc A. SA sets FIX to -10 and starts raiding into FIX territory. After almost a week FIX sets SA to -10, the war is official. 6. SA & allies are starting a full invasion of Fix space. Orc A statement (it's in the news archives) :
Quote: Whilst the border incidents and the tactical weight of the region played an important part in deteriorating relations between both parties, Pebbledasher thinks that the Stain- Alliance "covets FIX territory", going even further to say that, "their avarice has lead ... to initiate, what in their minds always was, an acquisitive conflict." This allegation is not completely refuted by Orc A, who justifies their action: "It's time for more cooperative members to reside in Querious", with the long term objective being the complete termination of the Firmus Ixion alliance.
7. After weeks of a 2 front war FAT falls and FIX offers SA a ceasefire. Knowing Orc A FIX diplomates also prepare a backup plan in case SA rejects the offer. 8. SA not only breaks the ceasefire terms but blows the show completely by making ridiculous demands from FIX, followed by wardecing the arbiter of the ceasefire, BoB. 9. Pretty much all southern entities who so far kept themselves out of the fight come to the conclusion that an Orc A led SA is an unreliable neighbor and take action.
I think that pretty much sums it up. So you see it's not very surprising to learn FIX used diplomacy in the middle of a shooting war. Actually that's the major difference between the modus operandi of FIX and SA: While SA went into a blood frenzy, FIX might have leaned out but never lost their resolve nor focus of their objectives.
|

IcedBach Jr
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 16:21:00 -
[327]
U got to be kidding me, what a load of twisting the truth from this last speaker         Praeludium to success |

Koronos
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 16:22:00 -
[328]
Edited by: Koronos on 07/02/2006 16:28:08
Yeah, ridiculous. Almost as many mistakes in that timeline as in the last eve-news report. :/
Koronos
Edit: Actually, that's not true. Far fewer than the eve-news report. But, still....
<snip> can't bring myself to go back into the details. gl, hf, lets have some good fights.
|

YES Itsme
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 17:47:00 -
[329]
Macsine you talking total nonsens
dont see much things that are correct
think you beated the newsreporter nonsens post record
|

Macsine
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 18:33:00 -
[330]
Ok so can I summarize that you learned some things you didn't know before? Like things SA leadership didn't think the grunts need to know ? The Megri incident is here on the boards as well as a thread by Megri himself when he tried to get people to add to his bounty so it became worth collecting on himself in order to get rid of it - of course that was before clone jumps and leaving implants behind. There are also some reasonably dirty remarks around regarding Megri's sheltering by SA, or if you have an alt spy in fix just check their forums there is a fairly lengthy thread about Megri and his new - or not so new ? - friends in SA. The border incidents and alteration of standings are common knowledge (each party to their own interpretation). The X13 war you can check both on eve-o and on their own boards. The FAT campaign should be well-known to all SA. So where was I incorrect in regard of chain of events ? You might not be happy with my wording but it all happened, right then, and it's all here if you care to check. That's a mighty big pile of coincidence and absolutely noone in fix would believe any claims that this wasn't a campaign against fix that was prepared for a long time: the attempt to split fix like in the SE/SA war, Megri's flight into SA space - not a good choice, running to our allies after backstabbing his own alliance, unless... The merc war, timed against SA pushing into fix space. SA allies coming in on the side of SA practically from day 1. The supply of capital ships and poses being ready to be thrown against us. As I said that's a big pile for being mere coincidence. But if - I said IF Megri wasn't your guy in the beginning - then SA paid helluva price for sheltering a turncoat.
|

Xune
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 19:06:00 -
[331]
o please make it stop >_<
close the forum and get back ingame... im bored
|

Sapater
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 19:08:00 -
[332]
Uhh, WHY OH WHY do teh 'he said- she said' crap about WHY the war started in the first place keep commming up??
SA and FIX fought a bloody war. SA took FAT and Catch with Huzzah. Then SA wanted everything and in the process ****ed off BOB. Someone you dont **** off. Then FIX, with a merc they hired retook FAT. And Now SA is going to die, wether it be on the battlefield or docked in NPC stations for days/weeks.
The past is done with. And the future looks bright..well, not for SA really. But that will be another story for another post.
|

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 19:36:00 -
[333]
Avernus, first of all, very cool name. Sounds... 'Hellish'. 
Your post is actually very, very good. We scale our payments according to the "hardness" of a target or what the client expects of us. In some cases, our rates vary from week to week for even the same client depending on thier goals.
As to BoB - I've made this point in the past which is that we have never been offered a serious contract on BoB. Not once. By serious, I mean someone with concrete goals, a plan that uses us to our potential and the ISK to back it up.
Up until recently, the same question with regard to, "Why hasn't MC ever attacked [5]?" kept coming up. When a client with an agenda, realistic expectations and a good wallet showed up, we took the job.
The problem is this: the MC is still a small organization. We are the shock troops / Marine Corps of EVE. That's how we model ourselves and sell. We always make this very clear to any client - we can do a lot for you, we might even be able to tip the balance in a greater conflict, we can go in and do a hell of a lot of damage against a target, but we aren't an occupation army or an after-war police force.
Bottom line: if someone wants the MC to hit BoB, you had better have a serious wallet and a serious plan. To be quite honest, with the number of offers we get, I'm not wasting our time on a contract with no other goal than to "kill a lot of them" when we have other options with much clearer goals and definative results. 
Almost got reaching for my wallet in rl ;P
|

MrTriggerHappy
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 19:53:00 -
[334]
Originally by: Sapater
SA and FIX fought a bloody war. SA took FAT and Catch with Huzzah. Then SA wanted everything and in the process ****ed off BOB. Someone you dont **** off. Then FIX, with a merc they hired retook FAT. And Now SA is going to die, wether it be on the battlefield or docked in NPC stations for days/weeks.
I thought we were already dead 
|

Randay
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 20:06:00 -
[335]
is this a joke thread or something? ------------------------------------------- "Det hSr kan betyda krig!" |

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 20:07:00 -
[336]
Originally by: Macsine
blah blah megri this megri that The X13 war you can check both on eve-o and on their own boards. blah blah megri this megri that
X13 where shooting as SA as well n declared war to SA after their FIX thing.
Whats ur point? or is it drawing ppls attention from the bellow statement?
Originally by: Wizie
Originally by: CopeLand
Originally by: Eyeshadow
is of little consequence and the contract was already negotiated days before SA commited suicide and declared on BOB.
now for those interested in the subject, and have bothered to read through all the usual flaming, trolling and abuse.. and are infact interested in facts.. especially me and some individuals earlier in this thread talking about intelligence reports
this quite clearly must be the quote of the year
Or claim of the year.
Anyhow expecting SA to engage in FAT with a large fleet was silly from the get go. With the number of entities fighting SA in that area, it would have been a nightmare to move a fleet of any decent size around. Or even more so to reinforce it. The roaming BOB fleets would have made sure of that. Exuro and the FIX alt ASUYA and lot.
Instead it seems the MC like any other entity are unhappy that they might have to work at getting fights. Yay for npc stations in 0.0 Just glad that BOB havent sent a gigantic fleet down to do the same. They either don't care to beat down on an already outnumbered foe or know that bringing a capitalship/BS fleet would do little but frustrate the pilots flying them.
So we have :
1. FIX or BOB hired MC - Obvious or not. 2. MC(Seline n Eyshadow) had been contracted b4 Stain decleared on BOB and therefore during or b4 negotiations. 3. BOB(Molle) said that BOB dint hire MC.
So either someone is lying, and I wouldnt bet BOB lying on this matter, or FIX was plotting during negotiations.
Politics 4tw . Do u wanna play the name n same game again?
So Far So Good....So What |

USN CVN73
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 20:16:00 -
[337]
all southern entities should work toward common goals. be united and be strong because frankly when the new servers come up and if there is improvement in the fleet operations standpoint of warfare things on the eve map will be changing very fast.
if the entire southern region continues to fight and continue to be unstable than there wont be any forward progress especially when the time comes were friends and allys become critical again... we all know its going to happen. once the servers are more stable all this nonsense will end and real warfare and conquering will begin like eve is ment to be played.
I know i type lots of crazy ideas that people love to make fun of me and tell me to stay in my cage and keep my mouth shut but lets look at the big picture. Who has the most to gain in all of this? who has the most to lose in all of this if the south stays unstable? I know that as long as the sourthern region is fighting among each other somone elses entity or entities are gaining building and preparing...
Go ahead flame away im used to it...
USN CVN72 USN CVN73 USN CVN74 Proud Member of SA
|

FrioBebe
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 20:16:00 -
[338]
Originally by: BlackRain
Then I continued to point out that playing forum detective and making conclusions based on what people type on these forums is a bit silly - and even counterproductive when the poster himself said that "you can't believe what people write on these forums". Then, enter FrioBebe and incoherent rambling... I mean seriously, wtf are you talking about? That rambling sounds more like some freshman philosophy student on mushrooms.
As you can not answer my questions, neither understand what im trying to ask you to clearify, its going nowhere. So yes i will stop. Your right im wrong.
However, to adress your worries about me taking higher education in philosophy and eating unhealthy. I can calm your mind and let you know im not.
Bye..
|

Xantina
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 20:33:00 -
[339]
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx
X13 where shooting as SA as well n declared war to SA after their FIX thing.
Maybe somebody forgot to pay the bills ? 
|

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 20:43:00 -
[340]
Originally by: Xantina
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx
X13 where shooting as SA as well n declared war to SA after their FIX thing.
Maybe somebody forgot to pay the bills ? 
Maybe ,hmmmm not 
So Far So Good....So What |

Loftur sterki
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 21:19:00 -
[341]
******* THE END ********
|

Megri
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 21:33:00 -
[342]
Originally by: Macsine Ok so can I summarize that you learned some things you didn't know before? Like things SA leadership didn't think the grunts need to know ? The Megri incident is here on the boards as well as a thread by Megri himself when he tried to get people to add to his bounty so it became worth collecting on himself in order to get rid of it - of course that was before clone jumps and leaving implants behind. There are also some reasonably dirty remarks around regarding Megri's sheltering by SA, or if you have an alt spy in fix just check their forums there is a fairly lengthy thread about Megri and his new - or not so new ? - friends in SA. The border incidents and alteration of standings are common knowledge (each party to their own interpretation). The X13 war you can check both on eve-o and on their own boards. The FAT campaign should be well-known to all SA. So where was I incorrect in regard of chain of events ? You might not be happy with my wording but it all happened, right then, and it's all here if you care to check. That's a mighty big pile of coincidence and absolutely noone in fix would believe any claims that this wasn't a campaign against fix that was prepared for a long time: the attempt to split fix like in the SE/SA war, Megri's flight into SA space - not a good choice, running to our allies after backstabbing his own alliance, unless... The merc war, timed against SA pushing into fix space. SA allies coming in on the side of SA practically from day 1. The supply of capital ships and poses being ready to be thrown against us. As I said that's a big pile for being mere coincidence. But if - I said IF Megri wasn't your guy in the beginning - then SA paid helluva price for sheltering a turncoat.
I would love to read the work of art FIX wrote about me in the forums, post it please... 
|

Blacklight
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 23:14:00 -
[343]
Originally by: USN CVN73 all southern entities should work toward common goals. be united and be strong because frankly when the new servers come up and if there is improvement in the fleet operations standpoint of warfare things on the eve map will be changing very fast.
if the entire southern region continues to fight and continue to be unstable than there wont be any forward progress especially when the time comes were friends and allys become critical again... we all know its going to happen. once the servers are more stable all this nonsense will end and real warfare and conquering will begin like eve is ment to be played.
I know i type lots of crazy ideas that people love to make fun of me and tell me to stay in my cage and keep my mouth shut but lets look at the big picture. Who has the most to gain in all of this? who has the most to lose in all of this if the south stays unstable? I know that as long as the sourthern region is fighting among each other somone elses entity or entities are gaining building and preparing...
Go ahead flame away im used to it...
USN CVN72 USN CVN73 USN CVN74 Proud Member of SA
Your alliance just got offered that on a plate and your leaders turned it down. Now when the south unites and is strong where are you guys going to be sat?
Eve Blacklight Style
|

CopeLand
|
Posted - 2006.02.07 23:50:00 -
[344]
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: USN CVN73 all southern entities should work toward common goals. be united and be strong because frankly when the new servers come up and if there is improvement in the fleet operations standpoint of warfare things on the eve map will be changing very fast.
if the entire southern region continues to fight and continue to be unstable than there wont be any forward progress especially when the time comes were friends and allys become critical again... we all know its going to happen. once the servers are more stable all this nonsense will end and real warfare and conquering will begin like eve is ment to be played.
I know i type lots of crazy ideas that people love to make fun of me and tell me to stay in my cage and keep my mouth shut but lets look at the big picture. Who has the most to gain in all of this? who has the most to lose in all of this if the south stays unstable? I know that as long as the sourthern region is fighting among each other somone elses entity or entities are gaining building and preparing...
Go ahead flame away im used to it...
USN CVN72 USN CVN73 USN CVN74 Proud Member of SA
Your alliance just got offered that on a plate and your leaders turned it down. Now when the south unites and is strong where are you guys going to be sat?
ye we got that offered on a plate the day fix(feeling*****y and bold) made us kos due to lack of targets(boredome) after iron/g left and made up some excuse over it like trespassing or friendlyfire and then the newest one involving some guy no one knows
i can only assume this was left alone by those protecting the idea of united south simply cause sa is as we all know dead
sounds like a real united south to me
|

Xelios
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 00:03:00 -
[345]
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: USN CVN73 all southern entities should work toward common goals. be united and be strong because frankly when the new servers come up and if there is improvement in the fleet operations standpoint of warfare things on the eve map will be changing very fast.
if the entire southern region continues to fight and continue to be unstable than there wont be any forward progress especially when the time comes were friends and allys become critical again... we all know its going to happen. once the servers are more stable all this nonsense will end and real warfare and conquering will begin like eve is ment to be played.
I know i type lots of crazy ideas that people love to make fun of me and tell me to stay in my cage and keep my mouth shut but lets look at the big picture. Who has the most to gain in all of this? who has the most to lose in all of this if the south stays unstable? I know that as long as the sourthern region is fighting among each other somone elses entity or entities are gaining building and preparing...
Go ahead flame away im used to it...
USN CVN72 USN CVN73 USN CVN74 Proud Member of SA
Your alliance just got offered that on a plate and your leaders turned it down. Now when the south unites and is strong where are you guys going to be sat?
Please, it was exactly the same thing we were offered last time FIX invaded FAT. We took it back then on good faith in this whole southern stability idea (and trust me it took a lot of convincing internally, especially after FIX posted the 'agreement') but look where that got us, dealing with another invasion by FIX.
Signature removed. -Zhuge ([email protected]) Woot.
|

Sceartan
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 00:54:00 -
[346]
Stain Alliance's stance on FAT was quite simple. Retake it from an enemy that fortified the system quite strongly. An enemy with multiple POS, ship & item supplies in the station and a very capable PvP force present (FoFF & Band of Builders). After it was retaken, it was to be provided to another alliance for management and control. SA does not want conquerable stations, they inevitably create POS wars which are counter-productive to the alliance objectives, ie: it's boring and we just want to have fun.
Yes it took 4 weeks (not 1.5 months) as our first engagment with FIX set off on the 2nd of Janurary. We had a tough enemy to beat. Every enemy ship destroyed resulted in a replacement undocking from the station and jumping back into the fight (much respect). The first operation was to secure the space and once we felt that task was performed, we brought in our own POS & Dreads (glorified indys) to reclaim soverignity and eventually, retake the station.
This was performed within schedule and was a tough job by all. Not only did we contend with fleets of 50+ in size attacking us, there was also the CCP uber weapon Large Artillery Ganker (lag) causing problems as well.
Our decision not to protect FAT during the MC/FIX invasion was a decision based on common sense. I was in FAT during the retake and with 100+ hostiles (easily), SA would not be able to organise a fleet within the short time frame. It would have been a suicide run and quite frankly, we'd rather use our ships fighting for our space at the moment since everyone is here to greet us "hello" at the door.
I hope that clears some confusion and we can all get back to the matter of flaming each other about other aspects.
|

Ras Blumin
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 01:09:00 -
[347]
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx
Originally by: Macsine
blah blah megri this megri that The X13 war you can check both on eve-o and on their own boards. blah blah megri this megri that
X13 where shooting as SA as well n declared war to SA after their FIX thing.
Whats ur point?
I'd like to know as well.
p - l - u - r
My first vid |

Diamond Dog
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 01:53:00 -
[348]
So let me get this straight...
SA is at war with BoB because a politically inept guy called Orc A thought overruling triggers deal with shrike as a good idea..
This world never seizes to amaze me :)
________________________________________
|

Reiken Moisark
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 01:59:00 -
[349]
After careful consideration I have decided to retract my previous statements that Orc A "should not have been in a position of authority within SA." These statements were ill-advised and NOT based on factual evidence.
Our research department has compiled and reviewed each and every post made by SA members during the course of their most recent conflict(s). With this new and intriguing information in hand we have reached the following conclusion:
Orc A is, in fact, the most intelligent and politically adept member in SA (aside from Scertain who, although we cannot confirm this, is said to actually be a logic droid created by the Amarr so we through out his posts as they were skewing the average). Orc A is by far the most qualified in SA for the position he holds and as such is undeserving outside scrutiny. It is believed (again, not provable as of yet) that Orc A's intellect far exceeds that of the average SA member (initial studies were inconclusive but showed that Orc A possesed an intellect roughly 3,000% higher). It was initially believed that Orc A was inept intentionally or underqualified. It appears now, however, that among his peers Orc A was to be commended. We apologize to Orc A for any hardship experienced as a result of our misconceptions. In effect, we feel that we have punished him for exceeding the average among his peers and this was not our intention.
Using this new research and a hunch that there's just something odd in the water in their native region we have just received a grant from the Gallente government which will allow us to investigate this apparent lack of intellectual evolution in the Stain proper region. Early reports show that the average evolutionary intellect of residents is well below the average of the rest of the universe, causing concern and leading to some extremists to demand that the region be shut down and burned to the ground, citing a quote from an anonymous researcher which compared the residents to "mindless zombies."
Results of the testing will be posted when they are available.
|

Cmd Woodlouse
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 02:55:00 -
[350]
You guys simply destroy your own fun with this "unified south" crap. I can tell you that from our own experience.
Well, lets see if the hardware upgrades make any bigger fleet actions possible and LOTS of things will change.
And maybe not the way you expected it to...
-G- Pink Power
Darko1107 > i'd rather be fat tbh :P |

Sceartan
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 04:06:00 -
[351]
Originally by: Reiken Moisark Edited by: Reiken Moisark on 08/02/2006 02:02:26 (aside from Sceartan who, although we cannot confirm this, is said to actually be a logic droid created by the Amarr so we threw out his posts as they were skewing the average).
I'm always skewing something around here..
Shish-kebabs & posts is what I meant you dirty minded buggers 
|

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 06:03:00 -
[352]
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: USN CVN73 all southern entities should work toward common goals. be united and be strong because frankly when the new servers come up and if there is improvement in the fleet operations standpoint of warfare things on the eve map will be changing very fast.
if the entire southern region continues to fight and continue to be unstable than there wont be any forward progress especially when the time comes were friends and allys become critical again... we all know its going to happen. once the servers are more stable all this nonsense will end and real warfare and conquering will begin like eve is ment to be played.
I know i type lots of crazy ideas that people love to make fun of me and tell me to stay in my cage and keep my mouth shut but lets look at the big picture. Who has the most to gain in all of this? who has the most to lose in all of this if the south stays unstable? I know that as long as the sourthern region is fighting among each other somone elses entity or entities are gaining building and preparing...
Go ahead flame away im used to it...
USN CVN72 USN CVN73 USN CVN74 Proud Member of SA
Your alliance just got offered that on a plate and your leaders turned it down. Now when the south unites and is strong where are you guys going to be sat?
So Far So Good....So What |

Macsine
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 08:14:00 -
[353]
Originally by: Xelios
Please, it was exactly the same thing we were offered last time FIX invaded FAT. We took it back then on good faith in this whole southern stability idea (and trust me it took a lot of convincing internally, especially after FIX posted the 'agreement') but look where that got us, dealing with another invasion by FIX.
So you're saying that after this Bull:
Originally by: Orc A Howdy. Fix has rejected the surrender terms being given by us and we will now proceed into illiminating thier alliance into ashes untill they kindlly agree to the terms in quetion.
Have a nice day-cycle. Orc A, on behalf of The SA.
...you expected FIX to stay out of FAT ? Perhaps you forgot - but FIX staying out of FAT was part of the ceasefire agreement that also included SA staying out of Querious. SA didn't, Orc A mistook a ceasefire for a surrender, and at least parts of SA mistook winning the FAT battle for winning the war. Orc called off the ceasefire - hence the war continues. FIX & allies took back FAT. SA had their chance keeping FAT but decided war against FIX was more important. So stop pretending FIX violated any agreements - Orc A called them off. Ask Huzzah - we had at least 1 Huzzah pilot jumping into FAT last weekend where he was flying around between the ships of our blockade forces, and nobody fired on him because FIX honors the ceasefire agreement with Huzzah and vice versa.
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 09:42:00 -
[354]
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx Edited by: Destroyer Draxx on 08/02/2006 06:07:13
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: USN CVN73 all southern entities should work toward common goals. be united and be strong because frankly when the new servers come up and if there is improvement in the fleet operations standpoint of warfare things on the eve map will be changing very fast.
if the entire southern region continues to fight and continue to be unstable than there wont be any forward progress especially when the time comes were friends and allys become critical again... we all know its going to happen. once the servers are more stable all this nonsense will end and real warfare and conquering will begin like eve is ment to be played.
I know i type lots of crazy ideas that people love to make fun of me and tell me to stay in my cage and keep my mouth shut but lets look at the big picture. Who has the most to gain in all of this? who has the most to lose in all of this if the south stays unstable? I know that as long as the sourthern region is fighting among each other somone elses entity or entities are gaining building and preparing...
Go ahead flame away im used to it...
USN CVN72 USN CVN73 USN CVN74 Proud Member of SA
Your alliance just got offered that on a plate and your leaders turned it down. Now when the south unites and is strong where are you guys going to be sat?
And while Stain was offered that on a plate, someone on the table of the negotiations was already hiring mercs to shoot us. Stable south 4tw.
Perhaps if you had a reputation for keeping to your word such preparations wouldn't be required?
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Mitch Taylor
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 10:39:00 -
[355]
Originally by: Reiken Moisark Edited by: Reiken Moisark on 08/02/2006 02:02:26 After careful consideration I have decided to retract my previous statements that Orc A "should not have been in a position of authority within SA." These statements were ill-advised and NOT based on factual evidence.
Our research department has compiled and reviewed each and every post made by SA members during the course of their most recent conflict(s). With this new and intriguing information in hand we have reached the following conclusion:
Orc A is, in fact, the most intelligent and politically adept member in SA (aside from Sceartan who, although we cannot confirm this, is said to actually be a logic droid created by the Amarr so we threw out his posts as they were skewing the average). Orc A is by far the most qualified in SA for the position he holds and as such is undeserving outside scrutiny. It is believed (again, not provable as of yet) that Orc A's intellect far exceeds that of the average SA member (initial studies were inconclusive but showed that Orc A possesed an intellect roughly 3,000% higher). It was initially believed that Orc A was inept intentionally or underqualified. It appears now, however, that among his peers Orc A was to be commended. We apologize to Orc A for any hardship experienced as a result of our misconceptions. In effect, we feel that we have punished him for exceeding the average among his peers and this was not our intention.
While Orc A may not meet the standard set forth by the rest of the universe he well exceeds the average SA member and as such should represent them to the rest of the universe.
Using this new research and a hunch that there's just something odd in the water in their native region we have just received a grant from the Gallente government which will allow us to investigate this apparent lack of intellectual evolution in the Stain proper region. Early reports show that the average evolutionary intellect of residents is well below the average of the rest of the universe, causing concern and leading to some extremists to demand that the region be shut down and burned to the ground, citing a quote from an anonymous researcher which compared the residents to "mindless zombies."
Results of the testing will be posted when they are available.
i like him...
/emote waves at an old soldier 
|

Wizardpete Draconis
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 11:10:00 -
[356]
Originally by: Sceartan there was also the CCP uber weapon Large Artillery Ganker (lag) causing problems as well.
Nice one  ___________________________________ Wizardpete Draconis Warlords Inc. CFO |

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 12:26:00 -
[357]
Edited by: Destroyer Draxx on 08/02/2006 12:27:51
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx Edited by: Destroyer Draxx on 08/02/2006 06:07:13
And while Stain was offered that on a plate, someone on the table of the negotiations was already hiring mercs to shoot us. Stable south 4tw.
Perhaps if you had a reputation for keeping to your word such preparations wouldn't be required?
So u are saying that u or FIX broke ur word b4 we did, because we have a bad reputation at keeping ours? Convienient excuse. But it only means that on this occasion we had good reason not to keep our word. N for the record FIX shot us just 5 mins after the ceasefire (Mass-dantes). U were saying something about keeping ur word?
By the way when did we break our word in the past? If u are refering just on the FIX latest war pls provide me the link to the FIX surrender post (not ceasefire one) promised to us. U still believe we break our word more often than others do?
So Far So Good....So What |

dantes inferno
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 12:42:00 -
[358]
Quote: reason not to keep our word. N for the record FIX shot us just 5 mins after the ceasefire (Mass-dantes). U were saying something about keeping ur word
This much is most definatley true, i had just left LGK on route to H74 when i see in alliance chat that their is now a cease fire, so i read the alliance mail myself and see with great dissapointment that this is true...so upon doing my next jump seeing 2 people in local with me and 2 blue squares near the gate i decide to change my waypoint, so i open the map to cancel h74 and head to agil to pick up some gear...when i notice i am been fired upon..closing the map i see the 2 blue FIX pilots shooting at me...i tried to FRAPS this but had a brown out at the time..by time i got back on i was in my clone station.(the kill mail is more than enough proof for those who actualy know the timing of the events..)
So please before acusing us of breaking our word take into account
1) FIX broke the original Ceasefire 2) FIX also had been hiering mercs before the talks broke down...
dosent seem like they were overly interested in peace..just to drag in enough people to tak fat back and save their necks..a job well done on FIX part...and i would love to know exactly how we achived this untrustowrthy rep? as i cant remember a single occasion that we broke our word _____ This is a Stain Alliance Fighter. It is protecting the assets of Stain Alliance, and may attack anyone it perceives as a threat, Threat Level: Trigglarist Fundermentalist |

Macsine
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 14:15:00 -
[359]
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx Edited by: Destroyer Draxx on 08/02/2006 12:27:51
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx Edited by: Destroyer Draxx on 08/02/2006 06:07:13
And while Stain was offered that on a plate, someone on the table of the negotiations was already hiring mercs to shoot us. Stable south 4tw.
Perhaps if you had a reputation for keeping to your word such preparations wouldn't be required?
So u are saying that u or FIX broke ur word b4 we did, because we have a bad reputation at keeping ours? Convienient excuse. But it only means that on this occasion we had good reason not to keep our word. N for the record FIX shot us just 5 mins after the ceasefire (Mass-dantes). U were saying something about keeping ur word?
By the way when did we break our word in the past? If u are refering just on the FIX latest war pls provide me the link to the FIX surrender post (not ceasefire one) promised to us. U still believe we break our word more often than others do?
Originally by: dantes inferno blabla
All of you seem to conveniently "forget" to mention that with RMR sovereignity change should take place 5 days after having more POSes. This is officially bugged (appealed with GM, the reply was that it's being looked into but at this time there was nothing he could do). So when FoFF took their posses out Sovereignity changed after 1 DT instead of after 5 days as anticipated. It should be pretty obvious that the genuine deal was brokered while FAT was still under siege by SA, so reactivating it when SA called off the ceasefire (don't contradict your chief diplomat's version with a badly concealed lie about being shot by FIX) was pretty much the logical thing to do. I know as a fact that in at least 2 cases FIX suffered the destruction of their ships without even shooting back in order not to endanger the ceasefire. So much for your stories about FIX shooting first. Why don't you make one about the SA fleet charging after some BoB raiders in hot pursuit then being wrongfully waylaid in BoB space while you thought there was peace ? Would make as good a bedtime story as this continous babbling about SA having been attacked by FIX when it was SA who invaded in the first place.
|

Crusher166
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 14:27:00 -
[360]
Originally by: Macsine
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx Edited by: Destroyer Draxx on 08/02/2006 12:27:51
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx Edited by: Destroyer Draxx on 08/02/2006 06:07:13
And while Stain was offered that on a plate, someone on the table of the negotiations was already hiring mercs to shoot us. Stable south 4tw.
Perhaps if you had a reputation for keeping to your word such preparations wouldn't be required?
So u are saying that u or FIX broke ur word b4 we did, because we have a bad reputation at keeping ours? Convienient excuse. But it only means that on this occasion we had good reason not to keep our word. N for the record FIX shot us just 5 mins after the ceasefire (Mass-dantes). U were saying something about keeping ur word?
By the way when did we break our word in the past? If u are refering just on the FIX latest war pls provide me the link to the FIX surrender post (not ceasefire one) promised to us. U still believe we break our word more often than others do?
Originally by: dantes inferno blabla
All of you seem to conveniently "forget" to mention that with RMR sovereignity change should take place 5 days after having more POSes. This is officially bugged (appealed with GM, the reply was that it's being looked into but at this time there was nothing he could do). So when FoFF took their posses out Sovereignity changed after 1 DT instead of after 5 days as anticipated. It should be pretty obvious that the genuine deal was brokered while FAT was still under siege by SA, so reactivating it when SA called off the ceasefire (don't contradict your chief diplomat's version with a badly concealed lie about being shot by FIX) was pretty much the logical thing to do. I know as a fact that in at least 2 cases FIX suffered the destruction of their ships without even shooting back in order not to endanger the ceasefire. So much for your stories about FIX shooting first. Why don't you make one about the SA fleet charging after some BoB raiders in hot pursuit then being wrongfully waylaid in BoB space while you thought there was peace ? Would make as good a bedtime story as this continous babbling about SA having been attacked by FIX when it was SA who invaded in the first place.
Have you concidered the many vegetables that may be displaced due to this war?
We're not mad, just misunderstood - Udat huh? - Imaran hello, this is not really eris rwarr |

BirdBleed
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 14:53:00 -
[361]
Originally by: Reiken Moisark Edited by: Reiken Moisark on 08/02/2006 02:02:26 After careful consideration I have decided to retract my previous statements that Orc A "should not have been in a position of authority within SA." These statements were ill-advised and NOT based on factual evidence.
Our research department has compiled and reviewed each and every post made by SA members during the course of their most recent conflict(s). With this new and intriguing information in hand we have reached the following conclusion:
Orc A is, in fact, the most intelligent and politically adept member in SA (aside from Sceartan who, although we cannot confirm this, is said to actually be a logic droid created by the Amarr so we threw out his posts as they were skewing the average). Orc A is by far the most qualified in SA for the position he holds and as such is undeserving outside scrutiny. It is believed (again, not provable as of yet) that Orc A's intellect far exceeds that of the average SA member (initial studies were inconclusive but showed that Orc A possesed an intellect roughly 3,000% higher). It was initially believed that Orc A was inept intentionally or underqualified. It appears now, however, that among his peers Orc A was to be commended. We apologize to Orc A for any hardship experienced as a result of our misconceptions. In effect, we feel that we have punished him for exceeding the average among his peers and this was not our intention.
While Orc A may not meet the standard set forth by the rest of the universe he well exceeds the average SA member and as such should represent them to the rest of the universe.
Using this new research and a hunch that there's just something odd in the water in their native region we have just received a grant from the Gallente government which will allow us to investigate this apparent lack of intellectual evolution in the Stain proper region. Early reports show that the average evolutionary intellect of residents is well below the average of the rest of the universe, causing concern and leading to some extremists to demand that the region be shut down and burned to the ground, citing a quote from an anonymous researcher which compared the residents to "mindless zombies."
Results of the testing will be posted when they are available.
ROFL !
|

Josclyn Verreuil
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 15:44:00 -
[362]
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse You guys simply destroy your own fun with this "unified south" crap. I can tell you that from our own experience.
Well, lets see if the hardware upgrades make any bigger fleet actions possible and LOTS of things will change.
And maybe not the way you expected it to...
At which point the combined forces of G Alliance, ASCN, and Burn Eden will scour the face of the galaxy!
~Clan Verreuil |

Trooper B99
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 15:45:00 -
[363]
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx
And while Stain was offered that on a plate, someone on the table of the negotiations was already hiring mercs to shoot us. Stable south 4tw.
Perhaps if you had a reputation for keeping to your word such preparations wouldn't be required?
I think I should point out again that the MC has not and will not divulge our client(s) unless the client(s) so wish. We not not confirm nor deny who may have hired us, but feel free to speculate or guess as always.
As has been said many times, we work with/against whom our client pays us to and care about what our client thinks about our results.
Wirykomi Team Racer - COLOSSUS Championships Year 106
|

BlueBus
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 16:00:00 -
[364]
Edited by: BlueBus on 08/02/2006 16:00:51
I thought that this would be an appropriate piece of information to share with everyone; it seems no one knows whatÆs going on in this SA/FIX war. This may enlighten everyone as to the main players of this self feeding engine.
Its not about friendly fire, or some long duck dong who you don't know... its about a conspiracy...
Here is a screen shot to explain a couple things (a screen shot in which I was given (no doubt I am an alt..), however, enjoy:
The Conspiracy: The Big Answer
Enjoy.
|

Gypsy Djinn
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 16:06:00 -
[365]
Personally I find the southern stability thing kind of humorous, but then again I find the whole North/South thing funny.
Anyway Good luck to SA you certainly have your work cut out for you, but I am sure you are up to the task, special shout out to trig, nick and TB, maybe its time to rein in IE-EX after this is settled or at least get a calmer more tactful person as your point man.
BoB, hope you packed a lunch, this isn't a battered FA you are taking on but then again I am sure BL and Molle have things under control and thought out.
To the coattail hangers, your cowardice has been noted, and don't be surprised if in the near future you are called on it, wonder if your "friends" will help you when you are under siege, time will tell.
V I R I I HeadQuarters http://virii.homeip.net
V I R I I - We Are Here For Your Daughters
|

Galaxion
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 16:07:00 -
[366]
Originally by: Gypsy Djinn ...BoB, hope you packed a lunch, this isn't a battered FA you are taking on but then again I am sure BL and Molle have things under control and thought out...
BL is never under control  -----------------------------------------
I like ya though, who are you again? - Wrangler I think he is the guy with the big rubber ball - Vanamonde Nice 'tash - Cortes |

Troubadour
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 16:30:00 -
[367]
this topic isn't locked yet?
|

Bedrock
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 16:35:00 -
[368]
Originally by: BlueBus Edited by: BlueBus on 08/02/2006 16:00:51
I thought that this would be an appropriate piece of information to share with everyone; it seems no one knows whatÆs going on in this SA/FIX war. This may enlighten everyone as to the main players of this self feeding engine.
Its not about friendly fire, or some long duck dong who you don't know... its about a conspiracy...
Here is a screen shot to explain a couple things (a screen shot in which I was given (no doubt I am an alt..), however, enjoy:
The Conspiracy: The Big Answer
Enjoy.
you're an idiot Frustrated:  |

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 17:51:00 -
[369]
Edited by: Destroyer Draxx on 08/02/2006 17:52:36
Originally by: Macsine
All of you seem to conveniently "forget" to mention that with RMR sovereignity change should take place 5 days after having more POSes. This is officially bugged (appealed with GM, the reply was that it's being looked into but at this time there was nothing he could do). So when FoFF took their posses out Sovereignity changed after 1 DT instead of after 5 days as anticipated. It should be pretty obvious that the genuine deal was brokered while FAT was still under siege by SA, so reactivating it when SA called off the ceasefire (don't contradict your chief diplomat's version with a badly concealed lie about being shot by FIX) was pretty much the logical thing to do. I know as a fact that in at least 2 cases FIX suffered the destruction of their ships without even shooting back in order not to endanger the ceasefire. So much for your stories about FIX shooting first. Why don't you make one about the SA fleet charging after some BoB raiders in hot pursuit then being wrongfully waylaid in BoB space while you thought there was peace ? Would make as good a bedtime story as this continous babbling about SA having been attacked by FIX when it was SA who invaded in the first place.
About the U saying we knew about the bug if there was one? About SA invading FIX - did u think we would let u shoot us through catch or engage u at ur convenient location? About BOB thing - There were reasons for this, I may or may not agree with them but still there were indications that BOB had its mind made up (about protecting FIX and dictating other alliances policies and Friends -KOS list ) and from the timing MC were hired (not saying BOB did it) it looks like we would have been in this situation anyway,
PS : Post with ur main
So Far So Good....So What |

Macsine
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 21:13:00 -
[370]
Originally by: Destroyer Draxx
About the U saying we knew about the bug if there was one?
No, I think you were as pleasantly surprised as we were annoyed, but it doesn't change the fact that we thought we had 5 days left to shoot your posses in the first place.
|

YES Itsme
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 21:36:00 -
[371]
Quote-- macsine -- SA called off the ceasefire (don't contradict your chief diplomat's version with a badly concealed lie about being shot by FIX) was pretty much the logical thing to do. --
fix shot down sa crow + fix rejected the terms so nap was gone, check the killboards
|

Mathra
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 21:36:00 -
[372]
Edited by: Mathra on 08/02/2006 21:37:37 I just hope we get a good fight, which SA has already proven capable of. Looking away from all the crap that's been flourushing lately, spies, lies and fraud, things havn't turned out too bad. SE and SA are "together", Tribal is getting more PVP, FIX got a wake-up boot in their arse and BOB got to do the thingies they like to do.
However, there's one thing I'd like to point out about the SA/KAOS/Huzzah vs. FIX war, is that it was in fact SA/KAOS/Huzzah vs. FIX and not SA vs. FIX, like SA likes to state in every 2nd post about the conflict. That's just a load of crap. So, before you start complaining about everyone ganging up on you, revise your past. And when you speak of us "tagalongs", remember that you've chosen new allies and friends, corps and alliances which Tribal doesn't exactly have a good relationship with.
Now, if everyone could just keep their pie-holes shut( ok, so I don't actually want that, but it would be nice to have some "peace" ), may we meet on the battlefield and have one hell of a fight, I'm looking forward to it! 
PS! My views and statements are my own, my corp and/or alliance has nothing to do with any of the content above.
|

dantes inferno
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 22:42:00 -
[373]
Quote: don't contradict your chief diplomat's version with a badly concealed lie about being shot by FIX
well, it aint no lie...for one thing i never lie its one of the things i hate the most in people, if you havent got the guts to speak the truth just stfu..everything i have said on these forums i belive to be the truth or i wouldnt say it...now ill be the first to admit i can be mistaken (and possibly are about a few things)...but as the pilot been shot at by fix while blue..its pretty damn impossible to miss 2 blue Fix ships shooting at you after a ceasefire announcment. _____ This is a Stain Alliance Fighter. It is protecting the assets of Stain Alliance, and may attack anyone it perceives as a threat, Threat Level: Trigglarist Fundermentalist |

Sceartan
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 23:23:00 -
[374]
Originally by: BlueBus Edited by: BlueBus on 08/02/2006 16:00:51
I thought that this would be an appropriate piece of information to share with everyone; it seems no one knows whatÆs going on in this SA/FIX war. This may enlighten everyone as to the main players of this self feeding engine.
Its not about friendly fire, or some long duck dong who you don't know... its about a conspiracy...
Here is a screen shot to explain a couple things (a screen shot in which I was given (no doubt I am an alt..), however, enjoy:
The Conspiracy: The Big Answer
Enjoy.
Obviously a fake, Trig has bajillions of isk, not just 2 billion. He makes us slave away in our miner-apocs to give him Zydrine which he sells in empire to BoB.
Thats the real conspiracy.
|

Psych0
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 23:28:00 -
[375]
Edited by: Psych0 on 08/02/2006 23:29:14
Originally by: Sceartan
Originally by: BlueBus Edited by: BlueBus on 08/02/2006 16:00:51
I thought that this would be an appropriate piece of information to share with everyone; it seems no one knows whatÆs going on in this SA/FIX war. This may enlighten everyone as to the main players of this self feeding engine.
Its not about friendly fire, or some long duck dong who you don't know... its about a conspiracy...
Here is a screen shot to explain a couple things (a screen shot in which I was given (no doubt I am an alt..), however, enjoy:
The Conspiracy: The Big Answer
Enjoy.
Obviously a fake, Trig has bajillions of isk, not just 2 billion. He makes us slave away in our miner-apocs to give him Zydrine which he sells in empire to BoB.
Thats the real conspiracy.
Not to mention that trig has been in mass for 2 years and 9 months and 5 days, but acording to that picture he has only been in mass for 2 years 5 months and 4 days indicating that the picture should be 4 months old yet it has 3 day old news
|

Orc A
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 23:45:00 -
[376]
Edited by: Orc A on 08/02/2006 23:45:57
Quote: ...you expected FIX to stay out of FAT ? Perhaps you forgot - but FIX staying out of FAT was part of the ceasefire agreement that also included SA staying out of Querious.
It would be more appropriate to say that some other party (not to be mentioned in public) confused surrender and ceasefire... Not me.
|

Bubblegum Babe
|
Posted - 2006.02.08 23:55:00 -
[377]
I have it on good autority The Triad hired MC for this as a covert way of helping there fix mates, and because they are nothing but Gate Campers who hide in Hed-gp. Considering Traid use nothing but Gank fleets most of the time they have probably got isk to burn and at least one of there corps can make Capital ships.
|

Avernus
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 00:29:00 -
[378]
I love alts who have information on good authority... it adds so much credibility to their statements.
Dante got shot down, right after the cease fire went into effect. Nobody should be disputing this, it's a fact. Also a fact is this: two FIX ships were shot down.
Cease fires going into effect immediately isn't always the best idea, because it can take a little while for word to get out. Accidents happen, they always do; to think that it will be otherwise is naive.
How an alliance reacts to small incidents as a cease fire comes into effect (and yes, they are very small incidents), is what seems to set some alliances apart from others. If you want to cry foul at the smallest provocation, that is your prerogative.
Ex-JCoS, Ex-Diplomat, Ex-Councilor, Ex-CEO (posts no longer represent Firmus Ixion) |

corporal hicks
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 00:30:00 -
[379]
Originally by: Bubblegum Babe I have it on good autority The Triad hired MC for this as a covert way of helping there fix mates, and because they are nothing but Gate Campers who hide in Hed-gp. Considering Traid use nothing but Gank fleets most of the time they have probably got isk to burn and at least one of there corps can make Capital ships.
Hmmm
" Stay Frosty "
|

RacerX1
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 00:53:00 -
[380]
Originally by: Bubblegum Babe I have it on good autority The Triad hired MC for this as a covert way of helping there fix mates, and because they are nothing but Gate Campers who hide in Hed-gp. Considering Traid use nothing but Gank fleets most of the time they have probably got isk to burn and at least one of there corps can make Capital ships.
riiight...if we have that much money to burn then I want my share if that's fine with everyone else... ...possibly the silliest statment about us yet.
|

Tadis
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 04:46:00 -
[381]
I will remind Fixions not to post in this thread.
Its purely for speculation and flaming.
|

Bailey Banks
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 04:49:00 -
[382]
Oh, come on.... Perhaps Huzzah hired MC to eliminate the SA POS's in order to keep from having their new turf in Catch trapped between SA territory? If we're going to spin conspiracy theories, let's not think small, okay?
|

BirdBleed
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 05:00:00 -
[383]
Originally by: Bubblegum Babe I have it on good autority The Triad hired MC for this as a covert way of helping there fix mates, and because they are nothing but Gate Campers who hide in Hed-gp. Considering Traid use nothing but Gank fleets most of the time they have probably got isk to burn and at least one of there corps can make Capital ships.
I thought i hired MC to mine for me in agil ..... what the hell are they doing in Querious ??? :D
We have fleets ? :D
|

Destroyer Draxx
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 06:04:00 -
[384]
Originally by: Sceartan
Originally by: BlueBus Edited by: BlueBus on 08/02/2006 16:00:51
I thought that this would be an appropriate piece of information to share with everyone; it seems no one knows whatÆs going on in this SA/FIX war. This may enlighten everyone as to the main players of this self feeding engine.
Its not about friendly fire, or some long duck dong who you don't know... its about a conspiracy...
Here is a screen shot to explain a couple things (a screen shot in which I was given (no doubt I am an alt..), however, enjoy:
The Conspiracy: The Big Answer
Enjoy.
Obviously a fake, Trig has bajillions of isk, not just 2 billion. He makes us slave away in our miner-apocs to give him Zydrine which he sells in empire to BoB.
Thats the real conspiracy.
Not to mention Trig login Screen has 6 alts ;)
So Far So Good....So What |

shivan
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 06:06:00 -
[385]
OMG is this thread still running?
Did someone take it to A&E and use a defribrlator on it and kick start it again. 
|

BirdBleed
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 06:35:00 -
[386]
Originally by: shivan OMG is this thread still running?
Did someone take it to A&E and use a defribrlator on it and kick start it again. 
Clear !!! bzzzz
|

Ku'Gras
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 07:11:00 -
[387]
Originally by: Orc A Edited by: Orc A on 08/02/2006 23:45:57
Quote: ...you expected FIX to stay out of FAT ? Perhaps you forgot - but FIX staying out of FAT was part of the ceasefire agreement that also included SA staying out of Querious.
It would be more appropriate to say that some other party (not to be mentioned in public) confused surrender and ceasefire... Not me.
Trigger? public signed ceasefire
|

Hans Roaming
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 13:00:00 -
[388]
Originally by: Bailey Banks Oh, come on.... Perhaps Huzzah hired MC to eliminate the SA POS's in order to keep from having their new turf in Catch trapped between SA territory? If we're going to spin conspiracy theories, let's not think small, okay?
I hired MC and so did my wife.
President Huzzah Federation
Be all you can be, join the Huzzah Armed Forces today! |

Ilany
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 13:48:00 -
[389]
What what? You're married now? 
That was quick. I thought it was only you're 18th birthday on Tuesday? -------
|

Galavet
|
Posted - 2006.02.09 14:21:00 -
[390]
Originally by: Ku'Gras
Originally by: Orc A Edited by: Orc A on 08/02/2006 23:45:57
Quote: ...you expected FIX to stay out of FAT ? Perhaps you forgot - but FIX staying out of FAT was part of the ceasefire agreement that also included SA staying out of Querious.
It would be more appropriate to say that some other party (not to be mentioned in public) confused surrender and ceasefire... Not me.
Trigger? public signed ceasefire
Its just the two headed monster that has been talking for SA for the past week or two, one head does not know what the other is saying. Maybe I should Invite TRIGGER and ORC A into a convo so they can meet.
Current RKK Ranking: (MIN100) CEO |

Taz Devlin
|
Posted - 2006.02.10 02:00:00 -
[391]
Why can't we all just... get along?
I can't even keep a straight face trying to say that
The Collective
|

MrTriggerHappy
|
Posted - 2006.02.10 17:05:00 -
[392]
Originally by: Taz Devlin Why can't we all just... get along?
I can't even keep a straight face trying to say that
lol damm right, its impossible, i just tried it too 
|

Turix
|
Posted - 2006.02.10 21:37:00 -
[393]
More bull**** in this thread than in a farmyard 
Mods > Your sig - Wrangler /me 4 teh win - Imaran /me pwns Imaran
|

Draximus Cane
|
Posted - 2006.02.10 21:53:00 -
[394]
Good fights SA
Well I guess its backto mining for Sel's Titan again
/me grumbles -------------------------------------------------
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: [one page] |