| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Caius Sivaris
Dark Nexxus S I L E N T.
76
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 16:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
Chessur wrote:Danny John-Peter wrote:Chessur wrote:Kasutra wrote:Chessur wrote:**** Tier:
Zealot, Sac, Eagle Zealot is ****? Wat The Nomen makes a better zealot, than the zealot. True fact. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha TII Resists more buffer and more DPS aren't important I hear. More Speed, Smaller sig, drone bay, are pretty important in my experience.
This will sure help loads when you are dead... |

Chessur
Strontless Mistakes Fatal Ascension
189
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 17:03:00 -
[32] - Quote
Well no ****- if you are already dead, than having more speed / ehp / dps is not going to help. Thanks for pointing that elephant in the room out to me. If it wasn't for you, i would have missed it. |

Caleb Seremshur
Gladiators of Rage Fidelas Constans
130
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 17:20:00 -
[33] - Quote
Is the impression that I am meant to be seeing is that rlml cerb is the best fit? Against other cruisers how does it fare? Click here for LP store weapon cost rebalancing |

Chessur
Strontless Mistakes Fatal Ascension
189
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 17:22:00 -
[34] - Quote
Caleb Seremshur wrote:Is the impression that I am meant to be seeing is that rlml cerb is the best fit? Against other cruisers how does it fare?
RLML is the only way to fit a cerb, and it does very well against cruisers. It rapes them. |

Caleb Seremshur
Gladiators of Rage Fidelas Constans
130
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 17:40:00 -
[35] - Quote
I was under the impression that ham was viable? My old ham rook scored some good kills before it got ganked. Click here for LP store weapon cost rebalancing |

Chessur
Strontless Mistakes Fatal Ascension
189
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 17:53:00 -
[36] - Quote
Caleb Seremshur wrote:I was under the impression that ham was viable? My old ham rook scored some good kills before it got ganked.
Well to fit hams, you are throwing away the absurd tank, and the speed. You also need a painter if you are planning to kite. If you are trying to brawl, you basically need to be in web range with web applied to do full damage to other cruisers (And if they are linked, you will stil not do full damage). So really its up to you. |

Caleb Seremshur
Gladiators of Rage Fidelas Constans
130
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 18:44:00 -
[37] - Quote
I can post a fit I had in mind a bit later. Basicly just a fed navy web and long point for range control otherwise just active tank.
From what I know of missiles the bigger issue is explosion velocity more than radius so dual webbing a target might net me more applied dps? My typical target is cruisers or BC Click here for LP store weapon cost rebalancing |

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1527
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 19:04:00 -
[38] - Quote
Chessur wrote:God Tier: Ishtar / Cerb
Meh Tier: Vagabond / Munin
Cerb is GOD tier, and Vaga is meh?? Wow, times change. "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |

Xequecal
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
110
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 23:01:00 -
[39] - Quote
Caleb Seremshur wrote:I was under the impression that ham was viable? My old ham rook scored some good kills before it got ganked.
Just look at ship stats while linked. If speed is 160% of signature radius or higher, CN HAMs start losing damage. The very high DRF on HAMs means it's very close to a 1:1 ratio, speed at 320% signature is 50% damage, 640% is 25%, etc.
Just to demonstrate, a linked Scythe Fleet Issue with a Domi MWD and 2 nanos has a signature of 308m and goes 3444m/sec. It takes about 15% of EFT DPS from CN Scourge HAMs. Even if you web this ship, HAMs are still only doing 35-40% damage. If they overload their MWD, you can apply two webs and RLMs will STILL do more DPS than HAMs.
While HAMs can't even hit ABing battleships for full DPS, if you load precisions into your RLMs you can still do 100% of EFT DPS to a Scythe Fleet with links, titan bonus, and a full Halo set.
Skirmish links completely invalidate all missile systems bigger than RLMs, period. The Sacrilege is actually overpowered if noone has links, but becomes **** if everyone does. That's just what happens when you combine a speed increase with a sig reduction of that magnitude. |

Chessur
Strontless Mistakes Fatal Ascension
192
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 23:05:00 -
[40] - Quote
Xequecal wrote:Caleb Seremshur wrote:I was under the impression that ham was viable? My old ham rook scored some good kills before it got ganked. Just look at ship stats while linked. If speed is 160% of signature radius or higher, CN HAMs start losing damage. The very high DRF on HAMs means it's very close to a 1:1 ratio, speed at 320% signature is 50% damage, 640% is 25%, etc. Just to demonstrate, a linked Scythe Fleet Issue with a Domi MWD and 2 nanos has a signature of 308m and goes 3444m/sec. It takes about 15% of EFT DPS from CN Scourge HAMs. Even if you web this ship, HAMs are still only doing 35-40% damage. If they overload their MWD, you can apply two webs and RLMs will STILL do more DPS than HAMs. While HAMs can't even hit ABing battleships for full DPS, if you load precisions into your RLMs you can still do 100% of EFT DPS to a Scythe Fleet with links, titan bonus, deadspace MWD, and a full Halo set. Skirmish links completely invalidate all missile systems bigger than RLMs, period. The Sacrilege is actually overpowered if noone has links, but becomes **** if everyone does. That's just what happens when you combine a speed increase with a sig reduction of that magnitude.
SAC is not OP, not even close. It lacks a much needed low slot, and has no ship bonus for missile application. Its stuck using HAM's, and HAM's are so trash- shooting a linked or unlinked ship. |

Caleb Seremshur
Gladiators of Rage Fidelas Constans
130
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 00:58:00 -
[41] - Quote
[Cerberus, Cerberus fit HAM]
Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Power Diagnostic System II
Faint Warp Disruptor I Medium Shield Booster II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II EM Ward Amplifier II Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile
Medium Core Defense Capacitor Safeguard II Medium Bay Loading Accelerator II
Probably a dirt-crap fit but for fighting other cruisers I've found it "adequate".
Pimping it out results in
[Cerberus, Cerberus fit HAM bling]
Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Power Diagnostic System
Corelum C-Type 10MN Microwarpdrive Caldari Navy Medium Shield Booster Caldari Navy EM Ward Amplifier Shadow Serpentis Warp Disruptor Federation Navy Stasis Webifier
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile
Medium Core Defense Capacitor Safeguard II Medium Bay Loading Accelerator II
With quite a bit better dps and of course range improvements across the board. WIth implants you break 840 dps, the problem is of course: application. Click here for LP store weapon cost rebalancing |

Hatsumi Kobayashi
Origin. Black Legion.
292
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 01:08:00 -
[42] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Morrigan LeSante wrote:Anyone actually dared to undock and try the eagle yet? Blaster eagle is amazingly powerul and can surprise a lot of people.
I haven't seen it many times, but EMP has run AB Eagles with rails at least once or twice with decent success, same for SOLAR. No sig. |

Chessur
Strontless Mistakes Fatal Ascension
193
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 01:39:00 -
[43] - Quote
Caleb Seremshur wrote:[Cerberus, Cerberus fit HAM]
Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Power Diagnostic System II
Faint Warp Disruptor I Medium Shield Booster II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II EM Ward Amplifier II Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile
Medium Core Defense Capacitor Safeguard II Medium Bay Loading Accelerator II
Probably a dirt-crap fit but for fighting other cruisers I've found it "adequate".
Pimping it out results in
[Cerberus, Cerberus fit HAM bling]
Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System Caldari Navy Power Diagnostic System
Corelum C-Type 10MN Microwarpdrive Caldari Navy Medium Shield Booster Caldari Navy EM Ward Amplifier Shadow Serpentis Warp Disruptor Federation Navy Stasis Webifier
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Scourge Rage Heavy Assault Missile
Medium Core Defense Capacitor Safeguard II Medium Bay Loading Accelerator II
With quite a bit better dps and of course range improvements across the board. WIth implants you break 840 dps, the problem is of course: application.
Why are you fitting medium shield boosters to a cruiser, with out a cap booster and a medium core defense cap safeguard... I dont even... my eyes bleed. Faint warp disruptor? Come on man.... fit dual LSE and be done with it, and throw an anci in the rigs with a T2 EM screen |

Caleb Seremshur
Gladiators of Rage Fidelas Constans
130
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 08:03:00 -
[44] - Quote
Haha yes I thought that would be your conclusion. Neither of fits are real I just wanted to know your thoughts on viability of an active tanked cerb.
But even so those fits are nearly cap stable if you fit 3% cap implants. I have about 5 different cerbs and they're all configured differently Click here for LP store weapon cost rebalancing |

Bertrand Butler
Cras es Noster
126
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 08:46:00 -
[45] - Quote
[Cerberus, HAM PvP]
Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Damage Control II
Federation Navy Stasis Webifier Warp Disruptor II EM Ward Field II Large Shield Extender II Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Assault Missile
Medium Core Defense Field Extender II Medium Core Defense Field Extender II
A dual EM screen reinforcer II + invul works too, although it takes a little more juice and links worse. Substitute a BCU for a nano if needed, and replace the web for a TP for large gang/fleet action. |

Caleb Seremshur
Gladiators of Rage Fidelas Constans
130
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 09:05:00 -
[46] - Quote
That looks pretty good.
I fit one with loading bay ii and a t2 em rig to free up a mid and keep the deeps high.
I find the cerb meshes quite well with recons where you can get them. If someone brings a tengu though their performance outshines me quite a bit except foe fights in an enemies deep falloff thanks to 40km rage missilea Click here for LP store weapon cost rebalancing |

Chessur
Strontless Mistakes Fatal Ascension
195
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 12:35:00 -
[47] - Quote
Caleb Seremshur wrote:Haha yes I thought that would be your conclusion. Neither of fits are real I just wanted to know your thoughts on viability of an active tanked cerb.
But even so those fits are nearly cap stable if you fit 3% cap implants. I have about 5 different cerbs and they're all configured differently
Active tank cerbs are amazing, RLML cerbs sport an XLASB. However a HAM cerb, can't hope to fit that type of tank. |

Danny John-Peter
Snuff Box
337
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 13:22:00 -
[48] - Quote
You can wedge a LASB/LSE on a Cerb without too much difficulty, its not got the same tank as an XLASB obviously but its handy as re-loading buffer never the less as long as you aren't tackled. |

shal ri
Zanzibar Land TAXU
15
|
Posted - 2013.12.20 21:19:00 -
[49] - Quote
I hope to god that the idea of ham cerbs being terrible continues. It will get me more fights. Post it everywhere. Everywhere I say |

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
48
|
Posted - 2013.12.21 05:26:00 -
[50] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Morrigan LeSante wrote:Anyone actually dared to undock and try the eagle yet? Blaster eagle is amazingly powerul and can surprise a lot of people.
THIS. put blasters, mwd scram and tank on it, and watch as the 150k ehp eagle MELTS peoples faces off. |

Jack Miton
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
2520
|
Posted - 2013.12.21 11:15:00 -
[51] - Quote
in my flyings, zealot and ishtar are both excellent, munin is unsealable crap outside of the alpha fleet it was always good at and deimos is still mediocre in the extreme.
the kitey shield HACs are still utterly irrelevant because tier 3 battlecruisers exist. Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/ |

kurage87
EVE University Ivy League
25
|
Posted - 2013.12.21 13:05:00 -
[52] - Quote
shal ri wrote:I hope to god that the idea of ham cerbs being terrible continues. It will get me more fights. Post it everywhere. Everywhere I say 'twas from before the RLML change. HAM cerb is the only way to fit them now. |

Liam Inkuras
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
657
|
Posted - 2013.12.21 15:14:00 -
[53] - Quote
shal ri wrote:I hope to god that the idea of ham cerbs being terrible continues. It will get me more fights. Post it everywhere. Everywhere I say Your necro post to this thread has made it more known to people I wear my goggles at night.
Any spelling/grammatical errors come complimentary with my typing on a phone |

Rab See
Fool Mental Junket
17
|
Posted - 2013.12.21 17:01:00 -
[54] - Quote
Amazing that the Ishtar is by far the most potent ship.
It can field frigate, cruiser and BS weapons, hits for 900+ ranged dps on shield fits and has a nice selectable damage type.
Compare it to everything else, even most T1 BS and it craps all over them.
Its a pvp/e beauty.
Amarr got one good ship - missiles. Cerb is good, Eagle is surprising. Deimos now good ... Munnin - crap, Vaga meh!
Truly minmatar got the ****** stick - seriously one trick crap. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
12826
|
Posted - 2013.12.22 23:47:00 -
[55] - Quote
And yet both the Minmatar HACs were buffed (better sensors, Vaga effectively got a 5th bonus, extra low for the Muninnn)
1 Kings 12:11
|

God's Apples
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
208
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 06:10:00 -
[56] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:And yet both the Minmatar HACs were buffed (better sensors, Vaga effectively got a 5th bonus, extra low for the Muninnn)
It's more an issue of the weapons they use rather than the ships themselves. If the vaga was a laser ship it would be superb. It's just stuck with ****** ACs or unviable arties. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
952
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 08:47:00 -
[57] - Quote
The worse hac is The zealot. Dont know how ccp tought it was OK. It has not been used for a logn time before the HAC rebalance.
It needs better fittings and some reduced mass ASAP.
As of now there is no GOOD reason to use a Zealot. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
952
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 08:49:00 -
[58] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:And yet both the Minmatar HACs were buffed (better sensors, Vaga effectively got a 5th bonus, extra low for the Muninnn)
5th bonus my ASS. It has same speed as the sttaber!!!
Your argument is same as saying the ishtar got extra bonuses because it has more drone bay. Or that the zealot got eztra bonus because it has more capacitor than the munin. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Hatsumi Kobayashi
Origin. Black Legion.
324
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 15:43:00 -
[59] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:The worse hac is The zealot. Dont know how ccp tought it was OK. It has not been used for a logn time before the HAC rebalance.
It needs better fittings and some reduced mass ASAP.
As of now there is no GOOD reason to use a Zealot.
What is wrong with you No sig. |

Odithia
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 20:51:00 -
[60] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:The worse hac is The zealot. Dont know how ccp tought it was OK. It has not been used for a logn time before the HAC rebalance.
It needs better fittings and some reduced mass ASAP.
As of now there is no GOOD reason to use a Zealot. Good instant damage projection/application in scrimish with moderate to large sized fleet.
I agree that it is kinda bad. But everything is when compared to the mighty Isthar. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |