| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[61]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[62]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[63]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[64]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[65]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[66]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[67]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[68]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[69]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
 |

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[70]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[71]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[72]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[73]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[74]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[75]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[76]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[77]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[78]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[79]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[80]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[81]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

dazedandconfused
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:00:00 -
[82]
The ships with the best laser bonuses armor tank. Lasers are awesome.
Another point for Armor tanking. Thank you, Thank you!
|

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[83]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[84]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[85]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[86]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[87]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[88]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[89]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
 |

Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[90]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
 |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |