| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Tasiv Deka
End-of-Line
186
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:24:00 -
[211] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Try to keep up Tippia. The graph I posted GǪcan't be verified without you providing the fits. So I did the next best thing and built something that approached the capabilities shown. As it happens, such a fit would deal 400GÇô450 DPS to the Thorax at 2k, killing it in, oh, about a minute or so. Compare this to the supposed 550 DPS from The Thorax, which will need 4GÇô5 minutes to chew through the RokhGǪ assuming it hasn't done the sensible thing for a solo Rokh and gone active-tank, in which case the Thorax won't dent it at all. Taking 400 DPS is not the same as GÇ£invulnerableGÇ¥, so you Thorax is moving in the wrong direction if that's what he's aiming forGǪ
Tippia I always mean to tell you this when i read your posts but i think im in love with you just a little bit...
So much just straight up fact laced with a healthy dose of to the point sarcasm and finished up with a "here is my proof where is yours" Oh, Do go on... no seriously ive got nothing better to do then listen to all the petty arguments and feeble trolling attempts...-á
The sad thing is i'm not sure if i'm telling the truth. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1314
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:32:00 -
[212] - Quote
Tasiv Deka wrote:Tippia wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Try to keep up Tippia. The graph I posted GǪcan't be verified without you providing the fits. So I did the next best thing and built something that approached the capabilities shown. As it happens, such a fit would deal 400GÇô450 DPS to the Thorax at 2k, killing it in, oh, about a minute or so. Compare this to the supposed 550 DPS from The Thorax, which will need 4GÇô5 minutes to chew through the RokhGǪ assuming it hasn't done the sensible thing for a solo Rokh and gone active-tank, in which case the Thorax won't dent it at all. Taking 400 DPS is not the same as GÇ£invulnerableGÇ¥, so you Thorax is moving in the wrong direction if that's what he's aiming forGǪ Tippia I always mean to tell you this when i read your posts but i think im in love with you just a little bit... So much just straight up fact laced with a healthy dose of to the point sarcasm and finished up with a "here is my proof where is yours" Proof? I saw no proof, just the usual Tippia trolling which equates to pulling 'facts' out of its bum and ignoring real solid data. |

Diamond Zerg
Taking Solo Away.
28
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:32:00 -
[213] - Quote
I think you may be wrong there, Tasiv. I've tried soloing in a Megathron (which has a tracking bonus) and tracking disruptors really messed me up.
You say earlier that the aggressor may be forced to engage. Being able to disengage instead of dying is a huge advantage, you can even come back shortly (possibly with fleet mates).
I think Battleships need more advantages to offset these disadvantages. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2265
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:35:00 -
[214] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:real solid data. We're still waiting for your fits. Why are you being so secretive about your work if you are so confident that you are right? Oh god. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1006
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:36:00 -
[215] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Tasiv Deka wrote:Tippia wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Try to keep up Tippia. The graph I posted GǪcan't be verified without you providing the fits. So I did the next best thing and built something that approached the capabilities shown. As it happens, such a fit would deal 400GÇô450 DPS to the Thorax at 2k, killing it in, oh, about a minute or so. Compare this to the supposed 550 DPS from The Thorax, which will need 4GÇô5 minutes to chew through the RokhGǪ assuming it hasn't done the sensible thing for a solo Rokh and gone active-tank, in which case the Thorax won't dent it at all. Taking 400 DPS is not the same as GÇ£invulnerableGÇ¥, so you Thorax is moving in the wrong direction if that's what he's aiming forGǪ Tippia I always mean to tell you this when i read your posts but i think im in love with you just a little bit... So much just straight up fact laced with a healthy dose of to the point sarcasm and finished up with a "here is my proof where is yours" Proof? I saw no proof, just the usual Tippia trolling which equates to pulling 'facts' out of its bum and ignoring real solid data.
SOlid? HAHAHAHHA HUHUAHAUHAH omg omg.. You do not eve have DATA, you have theoreycrafting.. that is as solid as a JIta scammer integrity. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18696
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:37:00 -
[216] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Proof? I saw no proof Maybe you should provide some, thenGǪ
After all, if you're going to dismiss the numbers I yield from the tracking formula because you don't like them, then I'm going to dismiss the numbers you yield from your little information-free imageGǪ fair's fair.
Quote:ignoring real solid data. There would have to exist some GÇ£real solid dataGÇ¥ from the beginning for me to ignore it. Maybe if you provide some, I'll be able to satisfy you on this point. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Tasiv Deka
End-of-Line
187
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:39:00 -
[217] - Quote
Diamond Zerg wrote:I think you may be wrong there, Tasiv. I've tried soloing in a Megathron (which has a tracking bonus) and tracking disruptors really messed me up.
You say earlier that the aggressor may be forced to engage. Being able to disengage instead of dying is a huge advantage, you can even come back shortly (possibly with fleet mates).
I think Battleships need more advantages to offset these disadvantages.
I was refering to what a single Tracking Disrupt could do (it doesnt really knock stats down that low) and yea bringing back fleet mates is a good thing but youll also see that i said a battleship shouldnt be solo so if we arent going completely 1v1 then you cant use it against one side for the sake of arguing Oh, Do go on... no seriously ive got nothing better to do then listen to all the petty arguments and feeble trolling attempts...-á
The sad thing is i'm not sure if i'm telling the truth. |

Lugia3
Emerald Inc.
775
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:43:00 -
[218] - Quote
Meme time!
http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/250x250/44526755.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/QcqIlsi.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/RAKr4WD.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/ZPue8qB.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/0rERhLC.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/xgIRLoz.jpg
http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/250x250/44526900.jpg "CCP Dolan is full of ****." - CCP Bettik |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1315
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:44:00 -
[219] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:You don't orbit a Rokh at 2k Tippia. You orbit it at 500m. So, moving the goalposts now, huh? Ok. At 500, it does 182 DPS, which kills the poor thing in just over two minutes. Meanwhile, the Thorax still does ~550, and still requires 4GÇô5 minutes (or GêP minutes). No the goalposts for small ships orbiting big ships has always been 500 metres Tippia. Why would you orbit at 2k where they can hit you slightly. At 500 metres the Rokh does virtually no damage. In 50 seconds my 2 flights of light drones kills the Rokhs meds. After that its game over. |

Tasiv Deka
End-of-Line
187
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:44:00 -
[220] - Quote
Oh Lugia... I miss you man... Oh, Do go on... no seriously ive got nothing better to do then listen to all the petty arguments and feeble trolling attempts...-á
The sad thing is i'm not sure if i'm telling the truth. |

Diamond Zerg
Taking Solo Away.
29
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:46:00 -
[221] - Quote
Tasiv Deka wrote:Diamond Zerg wrote:I think you may be wrong there, Tasiv. I've tried soloing in a Megathron (which has a tracking bonus) and tracking disruptors really messed me up.
You say earlier that the aggressor may be forced to engage. Being able to disengage instead of dying is a huge advantage, you can even come back shortly (possibly with fleet mates).
I think Battleships need more advantages to offset these disadvantages. I was refering to what a single Tracking Disrupt could do (it doesnt really knock stats down that low) and yea bringing back fleet mates is a good thing but youll also see that i said a battleship shouldnt be solo so if we arent going completely 1v1 then you cant use it against one side for the sake of arguing
Lol, a lot of ships can fit at least two tracking disruptors without making great sacrifices.
If battleships shouldn't have the ability to fight in small numbers, then they should be more effective at fighting in larg-ish numbers, in "straight up" situations where hit and run tactics aren't that important.
Them being worse in both small AND large scale battles is imbalanced. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8063
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:46:00 -
[222] - Quote
IZ knows providing the fit is just going to prove you right, so instead he'll just obfuscate and pretend it doesn't matter. Latest video - Pandemic Legion titan and supers killed |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1007
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:47:00 -
[223] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Tippia wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:You don't orbit a Rokh at 2k Tippia. You orbit it at 500m. So, moving the goalposts now, huh? Ok. At 500, it does 182 DPS, which kills the poor thing in just over two minutes. Meanwhile, the Thorax still does ~550, and still requires 4GÇô5 minutes (or GêP minutes). No the goalposts for small ships orbiting big ships has always been 500 metres Tippia. Why would you orbit at 2k where they can hit you slightly. At 500 metres the Rokh does virtually no damage. In 50 seconds my 2 flights of light drones kills the Rokhs meds. After that its game over.
That is why battleships NEVER fly alone in PVP (outside station games) .. because a second battleship a few KM away cancels COMPLETELY this tactic.
You show on every single post how much lack of pvp experience you have. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Lugia3
Emerald Inc.
776
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:47:00 -
[224] - Quote
Tasiv Deka wrote:
Oh Lugia... I miss you man...
Ehh, wormholes aren't my thing. I'ma pirate! "CCP Dolan is full of ****." - CCP Bettik |

Tasiv Deka
End-of-Line
187
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:50:00 -
[225] - Quote
Diamond Zerg wrote:Tasiv Deka wrote:Diamond Zerg wrote:I think you may be wrong there, Tasiv. I've tried soloing in a Megathron (which has a tracking bonus) and tracking disruptors really messed me up.
You say earlier that the aggressor may be forced to engage. Being able to disengage instead of dying is a huge advantage, you can even come back shortly (possibly with fleet mates).
I think Battleships need more advantages to offset these disadvantages. I was refering to what a single Tracking Disrupt could do (it doesnt really knock stats down that low) and yea bringing back fleet mates is a good thing but youll also see that i said a battleship shouldnt be solo so if we arent going completely 1v1 then you cant use it against one side for the sake of arguing Lol, a lot of ships can fit at least two tracking disruptors without making great sacrifices. If battleships shouldn't have the ability to fight in small numbers, then they should be more effective at fighting in larg-ish numbers, in "straight up" situations where hit and run tactics aren't that important. Them being worse in both small AND large scale battles is imbalanced.
im not saying they cant fight in small numbers im saying they cant fight solo which is a big difference from small gangs and as for large ish numbers its more of a how large is large... ive seen 2-3 tornados alpha a tengu but not even break the shield of a Raven at a certain point though anyone ship is going to be erased when enough is focusing fire on it its just a matter of what it can do before its sweeped aside Oh, Do go on... no seriously ive got nothing better to do then listen to all the petty arguments and feeble trolling attempts...-á
The sad thing is i'm not sure if i'm telling the truth. |

Tasiv Deka
End-of-Line
187
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:51:00 -
[226] - Quote
Lugia3 wrote:Tasiv Deka wrote:
Oh Lugia... I miss you man...
Ehh, wormholes aren't my thing. I'ma pirate!
Yea i know... one of these days youll have to join one of our roams though Oh, Do go on... no seriously ive got nothing better to do then listen to all the petty arguments and feeble trolling attempts...-á
The sad thing is i'm not sure if i'm telling the truth. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18696
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:51:00 -
[227] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:No the goalposts for small ships orbiting big ships has always been 500 metres
Infinity Ziona wrote:The only thing that is important is in all cases a Rax inside 2k of a Rokh So, moving the goalposts now, huh?
Quote:At 500 metres the Rokh does GǪabout 181 DPS, which is enough to kill a Thorax in 2 minutes GÇö less than half of what the Thorax needs to kill the Rokh.
Quote: In 50 seconds my 2 flights of light drones kills the Rokhs meds. After that its game over. GǪand this is why you need to provide the fits, because now you've altered what you initially submitted as GÇ£evidenceGÇ¥. So how long does it take for your two flights to kill his two flights? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Lugia3
Emerald Inc.
776
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:52:00 -
[228] - Quote
Tasiv Deka wrote:Lugia3 wrote:Tasiv Deka wrote:
Oh Lugia... I miss you man...
Ehh, wormholes aren't my thing. I'ma pirate! Yea i know... one of these days youll have to join one of our roams though
Any time. "CCP Dolan is full of ****." - CCP Bettik |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1316
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:52:00 -
[229] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:real solid data. We're still waiting for your fits. Why are you being so secretive about your work if you are so confident that you are right?
Rokh
Highs Neutron Blaster Cannon II's
Meds Prop X (scram = no applicable) Warp Scram II Webbifier II Tank (Add the best tank you can)
Lows 3 x Mag Stab II 1 x TE II DCU II
Drones Whatever you like
Rax
[Thorax, I Kill BS] Tracking Enhancer II Tracking Enhancer II Damage Control II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Warp Scrambler II Small Capacitor Booster II, Cap Booster 25 Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Heavy Ion Blaster II, Void M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Void M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Void M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Void M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Void M
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Hobgoblin II x5 Hobgoblin II x5
|

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1007
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:53:00 -
[230] - Quote
Diamond Zerg wrote:Tasiv Deka wrote:Diamond Zerg wrote:I think you may be wrong there, Tasiv. I've tried soloing in a Megathron (which has a tracking bonus) and tracking disruptors really messed me up.
You say earlier that the aggressor may be forced to engage. Being able to disengage instead of dying is a huge advantage, you can even come back shortly (possibly with fleet mates).
I think Battleships need more advantages to offset these disadvantages. I was refering to what a single Tracking Disrupt could do (it doesnt really knock stats down that low) and yea bringing back fleet mates is a good thing but youll also see that i said a battleship shouldnt be solo so if we arent going completely 1v1 then you cant use it against one side for the sake of arguing Lol, a lot of ships can fit at least two tracking disruptors without making great sacrifices. If battleships shouldn't have the ability to fight in small numbers, then they should be more effective at fighting in larg-ish numbers, in "straight up" situations where hit and run tactics aren't that important. Them being worse in both small AND large scale battles is imbalanced.
Solo and small numbers are completely different things.
take a group of 4 of these , and then try to check how many t1 cruisers you need at same time to deal with that small group of battleships?
[Dominix, New Setup 1] Drone Damage Amplifier II Drone Damage Amplifier II Damage Control II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I
Large Micro Jump Drive Warp Disruptor II Stasis Webifier II Omnidirectional Tracking Link II Heavy Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I, Navy Cap Booster 800
Heavy Unstable Power Fluctuator I Large 'Solace' Remote Armor Repairer Large 'Solace' Remote Armor Repairer Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II Heavy Unstable Power Fluctuator I
Large Egress Port Maximizer I Large Egress Port Maximizer I Large Remote Repair Augmentor I
Garde II x5
"If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Diamond Zerg
Taking Solo Away.
29
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:54:00 -
[231] - Quote
Tasiv Deka wrote:Diamond Zerg wrote:Tasiv Deka wrote:Diamond Zerg wrote:I think you may be wrong there, Tasiv. I've tried soloing in a Megathron (which has a tracking bonus) and tracking disruptors really messed me up.
You say earlier that the aggressor may be forced to engage. Being able to disengage instead of dying is a huge advantage, you can even come back shortly (possibly with fleet mates).
I think Battleships need more advantages to offset these disadvantages. I was refering to what a single Tracking Disrupt could do (it doesnt really knock stats down that low) and yea bringing back fleet mates is a good thing but youll also see that i said a battleship shouldnt be solo so if we arent going completely 1v1 then you cant use it against one side for the sake of arguing Lol, a lot of ships can fit at least two tracking disruptors without making great sacrifices. If battleships shouldn't have the ability to fight in small numbers, then they should be more effective at fighting in larg-ish numbers, in "straight up" situations where hit and run tactics aren't that important. Them being worse in both small AND large scale battles is imbalanced. im not saying they cant fight in small numbers im saying they cant fight solo which is a big difference from small gangs and as for large ish numbers its more of a how large is large... ive seen 2-3 tornados alpha a tengu but not even break the shield of a Raven at a certain point though anyone ship is going to be erased when enough is focusing fire on it its just a matter of what it can do before its sweeped aside
I'm referring to the ongoing theme of using fast, nimble ships for heavy slugfests/straight up engagements.
Imo, Battleships should either be really strong, but not very mobile, or quite strong and reasonably mobile.
At the moment some battleship doctrines are just underpowered in general. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2265
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:57:00 -
[232] - Quote
So your Rokh actually only has one tracking mod (not 3), no rigs and is using the largest guns available. What ammo are you using in those guns? Oh god. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8063
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:59:00 -
[233] - Quote
Void obviously. Latest video - Pandemic Legion titan and supers killed |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1316
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 11:00:00 -
[234] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:So your Rokh actually only has one tracking mod (not 3), no rigs and is using the largest guns available. Which ammo are you using in those guns? No as I said, in the pic the top pic is the Rokh shooting the Rax with this fit, the half graph is the Rokh shooting the Rax with Tank replaced by 3 Tracking Computer II's with Tracking scripts + the enhancer and the Rax webbed :)
Rigs are resists and extenders. But that's not relevent. Only the inability to track to the Rax is. |

Tasiv Deka
End-of-Line
187
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 11:02:00 -
[235] - Quote
Diamond Zerg wrote:Tasiv Deka wrote:Diamond Zerg wrote:Tasiv Deka wrote:Diamond Zerg wrote:I think you may be wrong there, Tasiv. I've tried soloing in a Megathron (which has a tracking bonus) and tracking disruptors really messed me up.
You say earlier that the aggressor may be forced to engage. Being able to disengage instead of dying is a huge advantage, you can even come back shortly (possibly with fleet mates).
I think Battleships need more advantages to offset these disadvantages. I was refering to what a single Tracking Disrupt could do (it doesnt really knock stats down that low) and yea bringing back fleet mates is a good thing but youll also see that i said a battleship shouldnt be solo so if we arent going completely 1v1 then you cant use it against one side for the sake of arguing Lol, a lot of ships can fit at least two tracking disruptors without making great sacrifices. If battleships shouldn't have the ability to fight in small numbers, then they should be more effective at fighting in larg-ish numbers, in "straight up" situations where hit and run tactics aren't that important. Them being worse in both small AND large scale battles is imbalanced. im not saying they cant fight in small numbers im saying they cant fight solo which is a big difference from small gangs and as for large ish numbers its more of a how large is large... ive seen 2-3 tornados alpha a tengu but not even break the shield of a Raven at a certain point though anyone ship is going to be erased when enough is focusing fire on it its just a matter of what it can do before its sweeped aside I'm referring to the ongoing theme of using fast, nimble ships for heavy slugfests/straight up engagements. Imo, Battleships should either be really strong, but not very mobile, or quite strong and reasonably mobile. At the moment some battleship doctrines are just underpowered in general. And @ Kagura. Sure, an equal number of small ships, you're right, the Battleships might win. But how long until the smaller ships use their superior mobility to dogpile onto the Battleships? With the warp changes it's even easier.
Most BS doctrines are fine its just T3s are op so they get used more often right now (atleast in wormholes where mass is a big issue) the real issue is usually not enough support for battleships or not the correct support in some cases.
And as for the dogpiling well thats an entirely different story thats just throwing more people at the problem you throw enough rookie ships at a titan and they can kill it. For the sake of arguing you have to decide where to cut off reinforcements. Oh, Do go on... no seriously ive got nothing better to do then listen to all the petty arguments and feeble trolling attempts...-á
The sad thing is i'm not sure if i'm telling the truth. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1007
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 11:03:00 -
[236] - Quote
Diamond Zerg wrote:
I'm referring to the ongoing theme of using fast, nimble ships for heavy slugfests/straight up engagements.
Imo, Battleships should either be really strong, but not very mobile, or quite strong and reasonably mobile.
At the moment some battleship doctrines are just underpowered in general.
And @ Kagura.
Sure, an equal number of small ships, you're right, the Battleships might win.
But how long until the smaller ships use their superior mobility to dogpile onto the Battleships?
With the warp changes it's even easier.
How long? Almost until DT. You would need 12 thoraxes to tresspass the REPAIR capability of that gang. And then several minutes to kil the first one. By then you would have lost half of your thoraxes .
No where i am talking about equal numbers. Even TWICE the number of cruisers have NO chance to dislodge a gang of battleships well fit.
Warp speed only matters on hunting, and that is not battleship role. Battleships will NOT pursue anything. THey are there to control a position. You could use this gang for example (since I am proposing a small 4 people gang) to take a POCO in low sec. Now lets suppose your corp wants to use only t1 cruisers to save that POCO of yours? You think you would have remotely ANY chance with 8 thoraxes? No. .. not at all.
You will start to have a chance a bit over 12 thoraxes.... and even then I would not bet on the throaxes until you reached 16 of them
BTW: one moment you are complainign that BS cannot be used in small numbers then you talk about doctrines. Doctrines are NOT about small numbers. Small gangs do not follow doctrines. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Diamond Zerg
Taking Solo Away.
29
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 11:13:00 -
[237] - Quote
Small gangs can and do follow doctrines. And yes, Battleships are designed to move around the field, their damage and EHP is not designed with carrier immobility in mind.
4 BS are sitting ducks to be attacked by a huge number of compositions.
For example, lets say you added two falcons to those 12 thoraxes.
Now do you understand my point? |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1009
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 11:18:00 -
[238] - Quote
Diamond Zerg wrote:Small gangs can and do follow doctrines. And yes, Battleships are designed to move around the field, their damage and EHP is not designed with carrier immobility in mind.
4 BS are sitting ducks to be attacked by a huge number of compositions.
For example, lets say you added two falcons to those 12 thoraxes.
Now do you understand my point?
I am not dumb. If you can add 2 extra specialized ship so can I. So I add a damnation with info and armor links, and 1 navy apoc with tachyons to obliterate your falcons.
MJD gives all the mobility the BS need. In fact they can be more mobile than cruisers because they ignore bubbles.
ANYTHING you try to do with t1 cruisers only, can be easily undone by Battleships . You would need to bring like 5 or more ewar boats to ensure your victory. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1316
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 11:19:00 -
[239] - Quote
Diamond Zerg wrote:Small gangs can and do follow doctrines. And yes, Battleships are designed to move around the field, their damage and EHP is not designed with carrier immobility in mind.
4 BS are sitting ducks to be attacked by a huge number of compositions.
For example, lets say you added two falcons to those 12 thoraxes.
Now do you understand my point? This is a very important point. Part of winning EVE fights is being able to force an engagement and dictate range. A battleship or group of battleships cannot force an engagement, nor dictate range. This means the only time those battleships will be engaged is when they're able to be destroyed. They're usually also not able to leave a fight at will.
This completely ignoring the difficulties of the fight vs smaller faster ships. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1009
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 11:22:00 -
[240] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Diamond Zerg wrote:Small gangs can and do follow doctrines. And yes, Battleships are designed to move around the field, their damage and EHP is not designed with carrier immobility in mind.
4 BS are sitting ducks to be attacked by a huge number of compositions.
For example, lets say you added two falcons to those 12 thoraxes.
Now do you understand my point? This is a very important point. Part of winning EVE fights is being able to force an engagement and dictate range. A battleship or group of battleships cannot force an engagement, nor dictate range. This means the only time those battleships will be engaged is when they're able to be destroyed. They're usually also not able to leave a fight at will. This completely ignoring the difficulties of the fight vs smaller faster ships.
They can. And that is when you use them. As in my example. when the fight location is set by geogrpahy ( a POS or POCO) and the battleships are defending. The cruisers are FORCES to engage.
Again.. how you think you are the ONE that understand eve when EVERYOEN tha really do PVP disagree with you, and know that Battleships have thier roles and uses and on those roles they are superior to cruisers? "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |