Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
255
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 00:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ships skins may be coming this winter, if the recent hints are anything to go by. The possibility that they'll be sold on the NeX store is very high.
I'm going to pre-emptively attempt to stop an influx of tears when this is finally announced. I believe that there will be a lot of hate directed at this decision, simply because of a knee-jerk reaction that 'NeX is automatically bad'. Here are some idiotic arguments I expect, and rebuts for them:
'OMG I don't want to pay RL cash for ship skins! P2W! CCPfail! Unsubbing my 68 billion alts now! Will still continue posting, though!' Simply purchase a PLEX off the market using ISK, convert it to AUR and purchase your ship skin. Finally, P2W is Pay To Win. Ship skins do not make you win.
'You'll be able to buy ships outright for Aur!?!/ OUTRAGE! ANGER! DERP!' Nope. You'll need to trade in a ship and AUR in order to get a skinned version. We'd have had the Ishukone Scorpion already, but since the only way to purchase it would have been AUR->Scorp CCP decided to delay the purchase of skinned ships until the NeX store could support trade-ins or blueprint purchases.
'WTF! Barbie Nex store trash rubbish!!1 i'm not spending a single aur on rubbish barbie nex!' First off, you're not buying 'barbie dress-ups rubbish'. You're buying ship skins. You only hate the fact that ship skins are on the NeX store because you're: 1. An idiot 2. An idiot who hates Incarna so much that you want WiS removed from the game even though ship spinning is back 3. An idiot who hates the NeX store because there are some items on it you're not interested in You may be an :elitepvp: hot-dropper who despises Hulk because they're all 'pubbie noob carebears'. Do you buy off the market? Of course you do. Hulks are also on the market. Does it matter? No. The NeX store can offer a large catalogue of vanity items, many of which you can ignore if you want.
'VANITY IS STUPID WHY SPEND ISK ON SHIP SKINS!? Remove from game! I am the community! I am anger!' Then don't use ship skins. If other players (many players, at that) want a black Drake or Comet with flashing red & blue lights, then don't take it away from them.
'HELLO KITTY SKINS DETRACT FROM THE DARK DARKNESS OF EVE' There are no pink, shiny, Hello-Kitty skins. Check for yourself in the Sisi .stuff files. Furthermore, a pink ship skin for the Drake as a Christmas present would be excellent.
Thank you. |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
72
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ship skin = Vanity. I have no issue at all with it being on the Nex market. If your ship is destroyed however, you need to buy a new skin. Thats my view. |

T-Jay Charante
The Scope Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:Ship skin = Vanity. I have no issue at all with it being on the Nex market. If your ship is destroyed however, you need to buy a new skin. Thats my view.
The Spaceship Barbies will rage, if that's the case. |

Haulin Aussie
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
another thread where somebody tells someone else they're playing their game wrong.
sigh |

Alyssa Yotosala
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
Hai OP!
You be Trollin' I be respondin'
[ ] - U mad? [x] - Can I haz your stuffz? [ ] - Troll, x/10 [ ] - Who would _____ someone with a name like _____ [ ] - WOW is that way ====> [ ] - Haters gonna hate |

Paragon Renegade
The Multinational Company.
77
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
*Read CCP apology for NeX & Wis* "Man, you aren't actually trying to do this, right? Nobody is that stupid right?"
"How wrong you are" |

Shivus Tao
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
23
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
My little pony skins where CCP? I demand a fluttershy drake. |

Mortis vonShadow
Balanaz Mining and Development Inc.
307
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
Haulin Aussie wrote:another thread where somebody tells someone else they're playing their game wrong.
sigh
Another post where the poster is telling the postee that his post is not a post at all but rather a drull post at best. Now if the poster and the postee were to post similar views of the post then said post would actually make it to a sticky post-it note. Some days you're the bug, and some days your the windscreen. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á And some days, you're just a man with a gun. |

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
61
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
The reason I don't like the NeX store is that it doesn't add any gameplay to Eve.
Traders and manufacturers derive their gameplay from new items and markets that are added with expansions (examples would be T3 ships and boosters). Traders/industry players never get dedicated expansions like PVPers/PVE players do (oh wait.... Quantum Rise ). When new items and features are just plugged into the NeX store and tied to the PLEX trade, it's kind of a slap in the face to traders and manufacturers.
Ship decals could be a player run service, that would be fun. |

Cunane Jeran
40
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:17:00 -
[10] - Quote
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the new ship skins being sold via aurum, its a vanity extra, but is no way essential to gameplay. As long as the prices are reasonable (I'd suggest around the 1000 AUR mark) then there is no problem.
Yes people will cry, but they are self entitled jerks. Game balance and playability we should cry out, call foul play and demand more that's why we are paying a monthly fee, and the whole reason we are here.
Optional vanity extras like ship skins that have no effect on gameplay beyond looking all pretty like? At the end of the day CCP is selling a product and are after profit. If you can't afford it tough.
Simple as that. |
|

Rhinanna
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
62
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:17:00 -
[11] - Quote
I'm all for my little pony skins, nothing more satisfying than seeing your 425mm rounds blast into some cute unicorn's head!!
Oh yeah, late to see shrink, have to go....... ;) -The sword is only as sharp as the one who wields it! Other names: Drenzul (WoT, WoW, Lineage 2, WarH, BloodBowl, BSG, SC2 and lots more)-á |

Fionaa
Quantum Link Company
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:21:00 -
[12] - Quote
Cunane Jeran wrote:There is absolutely nothing wrong with the new ship skins being sold via aurum, its a vanity extra, but is no way essential to gameplay. As long as the prices are reasonable (I'd suggest around the 1000 AUR mark) then there is no problem.
Yes people will cry, but they are self entitled jerks. Game balance and playability we should cry out, call foul play and demand more that's why we are paying a monthly fee, and the whole reason we are here.
Optional vanity extras like ship skins that have no effect on gameplay beyond looking all pretty like? At the end of the day CCP is selling a product and are after profit. If you can't afford it tough.
Simple as that.
Do you feel the new nebulae-¦s should be NeX too ? After all its just skins, it wont effect gameplay. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
733
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:22:00 -
[13] - Quote
Of course ship skins will be in the NeX store. Anybody who thinks CCP isn't doing everything they can to salvage their microtransaction superstore is a moron. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Paragon Renegade
The Multinational Company.
78
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:24:00 -
[14] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Of course ship skins will be in the NeX store. Anybody who thinks CCP isn't doing everything they can to salvage their microtransaction superstore is a moron.
lol
Okay, this sounds very probable.
Jk, they would never do that, because they aren't completely ********. "Man, you aren't actually trying to do this, right? Nobody is that stupid right?"
"How wrong you are" |

Hallorin
State War Academy Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:29:00 -
[15] - Quote
Cunane Jeran wrote: As long as the prices are reasonable (I'd suggest around the 1000 AUR mark) then there is no problem.
1000 AUR isn't reasonable at all. Not if ship skins are destructible along with the ship. If you think about it, that's a 100mil+ cost for a skin that might go on a ship worth far far less
Now I know, the current nex items cost more than this. That's dumb too, but at least they are permanent in some sense.
CCP should actually want to see these skins flying around. Once fully V3'ed and corp logos start to appear, CCP should WANT to see big fleet engagements with skinned and logo'ed corps.
For 1000 AUR apeice, I think most will decide faction fittings are more important. Or just new ships.
If these are destructible, even 100 aur may be too high.
All that said, I have no problem if these are nex items. BUT, the price has to make sense. these present a nex store option that players may want to buy again and again, and that should be taken into account when deciding the prices. a repeat purchase should not cost 1000 AUR.
And, skinned ships should be transferable, so if corps want to be uniform, they can provide rather than having everyone now buying AUR. |

Hungry Eyes
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
142
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:33:00 -
[16] - Quote
i'll be very mad, bro. im already on the fence about resubbing after my 4.95 month is up. hybrid balancing is not on the right track, AF's are off the chart for this patch, and no word yet about FW. in addition (this is my opinion only), i think the tier 3 bc's are a bad idea as theyre going to completely phase out HACs, which are constrained to a few niche roles right now. i thought the idea was to fix old content before adding more crap.
anyway, rant aside, every other MMO includes visual customization for your avatar in your monthly fee, except for EVE. while im impressed by V3'ing of the ships, paying RL cash for a basic customization is ludicrous. idiots can consume this service if they want. Nex should not have anything to do with FiS and should be expanded on once WiS evolves. doing otherwise will be yet another horrible mistake. my 2 cents. |

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
415
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:33:00 -
[17] - Quote
This, to me, is one of those "watch what they do vs what they say" moments.
If, after admitting that NEX was a terribly designed mistake that ended in absolute failure, CCP then decides to massively expand NEX by adding ship skins then we will know by their actions that they don't regret NEX at all -- they just regret that we didn't all drop to our knees and blow them for it. |

Hungry Eyes
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
142
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:34:00 -
[18] - Quote
double post. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
734
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:35:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:This, to me, is one of those "watch what they do vs what they say" moments.
If, after admitting that NEX was a terribly designed mistake that ended in absolute failure, CCP then decides to massively expand NEX by adding ship skins then we will know by their actions that they don't regret NEX at all -- they just regret that we didn't all drop to our knees and blow them for it. If they were going to go this route they would have removed the NeX by now. They are desperate for something that players actually want to buy to put in the NeX.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Zions Child
Odyssey Inc SpaceMonkey's Alliance
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:36:00 -
[20] - Quote
I've been gone for about a year and a half, and even I know better than to post something with a title like "Please don't be mad if CCP does x." You deserve to get trolled to hell and back. |
|

BeanBagKing
Terra Incognita Intrepid Crossing
15
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:36:00 -
[21] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:Ship skin = Vanity. I have no issue at all with it being on the Nex market. If your ship is destroyed however, you need to buy a new skin. Thats my view. Pretty much this, make them affordable and destructible and I won't have a problem with it. Well really, even if they aren't affordable I won't have a problem, I just won't buy them :P but destructibility is a must. |

Denidil
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
143
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:37:00 -
[22] - Quote
Fionaa wrote:
Do you feel the new nebulae-¦s should be NeX too ? After all its just skins, it wont effect gameplay.
no, they shouldn't - they're a core part of the game
they also don't affect gameplay. just because something doesn't affect gameplay doesn't mean it should be in NeX, but something in NeX that doesn't affect gameplay is fine.
now if only they sold Logic implants in the nex, i would recommend you buy one - because your wetware sucks at it. MM Bombers, Best Bombers |

ACE McFACE
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
54
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:41:00 -
[23] - Quote
I wouldn't mind if they where on the nex store, just as long as I can buy a good amount of skins with 1 PLEX. ZE GOGGLES, ZEY DO NOTHING! (Not wearing them so don't waste your time reading this sig) |

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
415
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:41:00 -
[24] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote: If they were going to go this route they would have removed the NeX by now. They are desperate for something that players actually want to buy to put in the NeX.
Oh don't worry, I'm not naive. I know full well CCP epic fail and put ship skins in NEX.  |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
255
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
I am disappointed by the number of mentally disabled, NeX-hating, knee-jerk derps in this thread.
Should ship skins be on the market, then? Well, if you want to buy a ship, whether skinned or not, prepare to open folder after folder after folder, finding the correct skin/ship you want. |

Hungry Eyes
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
142
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:46:00 -
[26] - Quote
Denidil wrote:Fionaa wrote:
Do you feel the new nebulae-¦s should be NeX too ? After all its just skins, it wont effect gameplay.
no, they shouldn't - they're a core part of the game
and ship customization isnt?  
every other MMO includes visual customization for your avatar in your monthly fee, except for EVE
|

Paragon Renegade
The Multinational Company.
78
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:46:00 -
[27] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:I am disappointed by the number of mentally disabled, NeX-hating, knee-jerk derps in this thread. prepare to open folder after folder after folder, finding the correct skin/ship you want.
Oh my breaking heart
"Man, you aren't actually trying to do this, right? Nobody is that stupid right?"
"How wrong you are" |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
736
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:46:00 -
[28] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:I am disappointed by the number of mentally disabled, NeX-hating, knee-jerk derps in this thread.
Should ship skins be on the market, then? Well, if you want to buy a ship, whether skinned or not, prepare to open folder after folder after folder, finding the correct skin/ship you want. Hello there, DarkAegix, perhaps you could restate your point while making sense. Or explain why the only alternative to the skins being sold in the NeX is some hilariously complex manual addon that would have to be copied and pasted to various folders.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

mkint
312
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:46:00 -
[29] - Quote
All NEX stuff should be destructible. Except they should come in packs of at least 100 at current prices.
I don't see a problem with it being in nex stores, as long as I can remove the new default logos for free.
It's also important to differentiate between "ship skins" and "custom paint jobs." I don't think paint jobs will be in the winter expansion. Custom paint jobs require V3 textures, and V3 is only being done for gallente and caldari in the winter. It would mean you wouldn't be able to customize your minmatar/amarr/pirate boats, which would suck, and p!ss off a lot of those pilots (even if they aren't planning on using paintjobs.) |

Dalloway Jones
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
79
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:47:00 -
[30] - Quote
This is what I am saving all that free AUR they gave us for. |
|

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
415
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:47:00 -
[31] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:I am disappointed by the number of mentally disabled, NeX-hating, knee-jerk derps in this thread.
You don't even have a monocle ya NEX-lovin' *****. |

Fionaa
Quantum Link Company
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:52:00 -
[32] - Quote
Denidil wrote:Fionaa wrote:
Do you feel the new nebulae-¦s should be NeX too ? After all its just skins, it wont effect gameplay.
no, they shouldn't - they're a core part of the game they also don't affect gameplay. just because something doesn't affect gameplay doesn't mean it should be in NeX, but something in NeX that doesn't affect gameplay is fine. now if only they sold Logic implants in the nex, i would recommend you buy one - because your wetware sucks at it.
Calm down aldo, im just hinting at something. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
255
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:53:00 -
[33] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote: Hello there, DarkAegix, perhaps you could restate your point while making sense. Or explain why the only alternative to the skins being sold in the NeX is some hilariously complex manual addon that would have to be copied and pasted to various folders.
Perhaps there could be some kind of store which is separate from the market.... Perhaps in this amazing store we can trade-in ships for skinned versions.... Perhaps we already have this framework. The NeX store. |

Wacktopia
Sicarius. Legion of The Damned.
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:55:00 -
[34] - Quote
Rumour thread. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
736
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 01:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote: Hello there, DarkAegix, perhaps you could restate your point while making sense. Or explain why the only alternative to the skins being sold in the NeX is some hilariously complex manual addon that would have to be copied and pasted to various folders.
Perhaps there could be some kind of store which is separate from the market.... Perhaps in this amazing store we can trade-in ships for skinned versions.... Perhaps we already have this framework. The NeX store. None of those sentences answered my question. Also you need a monocle before I will accept your NeX-loving posts.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
255
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 02:02:00 -
[36] - Quote
Wacktopia wrote:Rumour thread. I may as well link some scattered, vague sources, right?  Ship skins: http://www.eveonline.com/media/23941/bg.jpg Ship skins in Sisi: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=31304 See post by CCP Zymurgist here: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1560099
Also, Ladie Harlot, I would like to inform you that you in fact did not ask a question. Thank you. |

Cunane Jeran
41
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 02:04:00 -
[37] - Quote
well either 1000 and non destructible or 100 and destructible, either way for the time invested in NeX and the whole incarna notion, it's not something that'll go away.
About the Nebula's should be NeX if ship skins are. Use your freaking head lad! Nebula's effect everyone, that's like saying you should be able to make Dodixie II a plasma planet with NeX. When NeX and ship skins is obviously a very personal change affecting only yourself.
Micro-transactions are here and here to stay, and if you don't want them then don't use them. At no point are you told YOU HAVE to do this. Boycott it if you don't want it, just don't ***** about it to those who want these things.
|

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
415
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 02:09:00 -
[38] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote: CCP Zymurgist
Or as I like to call him, CCP Shouldabeeninthetwentypercent. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
737
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 02:10:00 -
[39] - Quote
It's rather telling that even though players have asked for ship skins and logos since the game first started CCP only started working on it once they had a microtransaction store. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
100
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 02:11:00 -
[40] - Quote
Okay I'll bite Mr Troll ......
Ship skins like other items in the game should be player produced. I find the NEX Store appologists like yourself extremely short sighted as to what is good for the game moving forward. Your attitude is, this doesn't affect my little piece of EVE so who gives a **** right.
CCP have chosen to belittle and marginalise any potential the items they have put in the NEX Store could have had on actual gameplay content. CCP looked to F2P games and what they were doing in their themeparks with microtransactions. At the same time conveniently ignoring that fact that EVE is a sandbox with Sub/PLEX already, but instead wanted to add what are now feature removing microtransactions on top of that rather than expanding gameplay content.
The items in the NEX could have still achieved what CCP wanted and also added gameplay benefits to the players, but instead the $500 sparkle tiger riding people and their ilk in CCP thought otherwise.
Yes CCP came very close to shitting on all the players that produced Scorpions with the Ishukone one being slated to be in the NEX Store just to see what happened. Thankfully they stopped only because someone spied it on the test server and made a forum post about it, otherwise CCP would have merrily gone ahead with it. Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |
|

Cunane Jeran
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 02:37:00 -
[41] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:Stuff.
You raise some good points, but I believe CCP have already said (during the AT9 finals) that the ship skins would require AUR and the Ship as a trade in, so for a Roden Mega, it'd be a Mega + 500 aur or something
So it doesn't by-pass the market |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
257
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 02:50:00 -
[42] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:Okay I'll bite Mr Troll ......
Ship skins like other items in the game should be player produced. I find the NEX Store appologists like yourself extremely short sighted as to what is good for the game moving forward. Your attitude is, this doesn't affect my little piece of EVE so who gives a **** right.
CCP have chosen to belittle and marginalise any potential the items they have put in the NEX Store could have had on actual gameplay content. CCP looked to F2P games and what they were doing in their themeparks with microtransactions. At the same time conveniently ignoring that fact that EVE is a sandbox with Sub/PLEX already, but instead wanted to add what are now feature removing microtransactions on top of that rather than expanding gameplay content.
The items in the NEX could have still achieved what CCP wanted and also added gameplay benefits to the players, but instead the $500 sparkle tiger riding people and their ilk in CCP thought otherwise.
Yes CCP came very close to shitting on all the players that produced Scorpions with the Ishukone one being slated to be in the NEX Store just to see what happened. Thankfully they stopped only because someone spied it on the test server and made a forum post about it, otherwise CCP would have merrily gone ahead with it. I respect your opinion, but propose that introducing a player-based skin manufacturing system will simply add too much delay to a feature I am greatly anticipating. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
742
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 02:52:00 -
[43] - Quote
Cunane Jeran wrote:Azahni Vah'nos wrote:Stuff. You raise some good points, but I believe CCP have already said (during the AT9 finals) that the ship skins would require AUR and the Ship as a trade in, so for a Roden Mega, it'd be a Mega + 500 aur or something So it doesn't by-pass the market It bypasses the ability of the players to craft the skins. Same as the clothing.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Cunane Jeran
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 02:57:00 -
[44] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Cunane Jeran wrote:Azahni Vah'nos wrote:Stuff. You raise some good points, but I believe CCP have already said (during the AT9 finals) that the ship skins would require AUR and the Ship as a trade in, so for a Roden Mega, it'd be a Mega + 500 aur or something So it doesn't by-pass the market It bypasses the ability of the players to craft the skins. Same as the clothing.
Actually I'll give you that, if PI goods were needed then it would be a lot better for everyone involved. |

Yanto Widowmaker
Warpdrive Logistics
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:03:00 -
[45] - Quote
Bling has no Sting, so all good with that!  |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
223
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:07:00 -
[46] - Quote
Backhands*
Default skins are free due to changes in quality requirements.
|

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
20
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:09:00 -
[47] - Quote
I actually don't care, as long as the default skins aren't stupid space camo for the bloody Comet! 
As long as the default skin is not painful, I wouldn't mind having the new skins be Nex items. Heck they might as well use it for something since our characters won't be getting much usage. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
743
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:11:00 -
[48] - Quote
Corina Jarr wrote:I actually don't care, as long as the default skins aren't stupid space camo for the bloody Comet!  As long as the default skin is not painful, I wouldn't mind having the new skins be Nex items. Heck they might as well use it for something since our characters won't be getting much usage. I think I see the shape of CCP's new business plan: make the default skins so hideous that you have to spend cash in the microtransaction superstore to get rid of them.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
20
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:12:00 -
[49] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Corina Jarr wrote:I actually don't care, as long as the default skins aren't stupid space camo for the bloody Comet!  As long as the default skin is not painful, I wouldn't mind having the new skins be Nex items. Heck they might as well use it for something since our characters won't be getting much usage. I think I see the shape of CCP's new business plan: make the default skins so hideous that you have to spend cash in the microtransaction superstore to get rid of them.
 Not a pleasant thought... |

Hershman
G-Weezy
48
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:18:00 -
[50] - Quote
You will always have the whining idiots who think Nex is the death of Eve...
For example: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=27324
This is how it should be handled. |
|

Written Word
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
98
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:19:00 -
[51] - Quote
Of course its going to be in the NeX store. They might be reasonably priced.
No, there won't be any "custom skins", just the ability to pick a pre-created one.
|

Fionaa
Quantum Link Company
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:30:00 -
[52] - Quote
Cunane Jeran wrote:About the Nebula's should be NeX if ship skins are. Use your freaking head lad! Nebula's effect everyone, that's like saying you should be able to make Dodixie II a plasma planet with NeX. When NeX and ship skins is obviously a very personal change affecting only yourself.
I never said "nebulas should be in nex" Dont make **** up. Im just asking where do you draw the line about new gameplay contet being bought in nex store. I pay for my sub and i kinda take for granted that new game contet is what i keep paying eve online for, but maybe Im just fooling myself. And i really dont care about "core gameplay" "vanity" or whatever, pixels be pixels.
|

Hershman
G-Weezy
48
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:35:00 -
[53] - Quote
Fionaa wrote:Cunane Jeran wrote:About the Nebula's should be NeX if ship skins are. Use your freaking head lad! Nebula's effect everyone, that's like saying you should be able to make Dodixie II a plasma planet with NeX. When NeX and ship skins is obviously a very personal change affecting only yourself. I never said "nebulas should be in nex" Dont make **** up. Im just asking where do you draw the line about new gameplay contet being bought in nex store. I pay for my sub and i kinda take for granted that new game contet is what i keep paying eve online for, but maybe Im just fooling myself. And i really dont care about "core gameplay" "vanity" or whatever, pixels be pixels.
You are a fool if you believe a few vanity paint jobs are a substantial feature. Look at all of the new features coming this winter that are NOT on Nex. |

Tristan North
The Scope
40
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:37:00 -
[54] - Quote
What about nebulae sold by nex? And new ship models, and engine trails. Vanity stuff, isn't it? |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
743
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:37:00 -
[55] - Quote
Fionaa wrote:I never said "nebulas should be in nex" Dont make **** up. Im just asking where do you draw the line about new gameplay contet being bought in nex store. I pay for my sub and i kinda take for granted that new game contet is what i keep paying eve online for, but maybe Im just fooling myself. And i really dont care about "core gameplay" "vanity" or whatever, pixels be pixels.
I agree with you but you are going to be sadly disappointed if you think ship skins and/or logos won't be in the NeX.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Hungry Eyes
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
143
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:37:00 -
[56] - Quote
irrelevant. youre extrapolating...so rumour thread. this was before they lost thousands of subs. Hilmar said Nex is on the backburner (fact). |

Hershman
G-Weezy
48
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:40:00 -
[57] - Quote
And this is why CCP is run by professionals, not a few angsty teenagers. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
226
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:47:00 -
[58] - Quote
Quote:Hilmar said Nex is on the backburner (fact).
Hilmar said that the introduction of the NeX store was handled badly.
He said that WOD is on the back burner, and by extension we can infer that WIS content (save for what is already completed) is as well.
I have little doubt that the NeX store will remain, and that content will continue to be developed for it, if for no other reason than there is a direct tie in to DUST. This will be our conduit to sell items to DUST players, and vice versa.
Now I to am a strong advocate of involving the player industrial base in the creation of these items, but there is little or no doubt that they will be done via the NeX. Whether that means:
1: The NeX store sells a BPC or its equivalent for creating these items. or 2: Part of the purchase price includes a variety of player harvested/constructed goods as part of the purchase price.
Either way is fine, and in fact enriches the game in a number of ways (including your own wallet).
People are just going to have to get past the misinformation that was parroted on the forums during it's terrible initial offering, and learn that the handle pay to win does not apply when you can buy the item just as easily with in game currency as with cash.
CCP, on the other hand, must absolutely include the current EVE industrial base on as many levels as possible in the items creation... and come up with some kind of realistic pricing scheme that players will actually accept as reasonable. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
226
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:59:00 -
[59] - Quote
Tristan North wrote:What about nebulae sold by nex? And new ship models, and engine trails. Vanity stuff, isn't it?
No, none of the above are vanity items.
Nebulae are part of the environment.
New ship models, such as the 4 being introduced next expansion, are core content available as BPO's and sold on the market.
Engine trails are a basic game mechanic, finally reintroduced after being enhanced and optimized in what will hopefully avert their former frame rate killing performance.
From a different poster:
Quote:I pay for my sub and i kinda take for granted that new game contet is what i keep paying eve online for, but maybe Im just fooling myself.
Okay, taking you seriously, by your definition the 4 new BC's coming next expansion should be provided to you for free as part of your subscription fee.
But wait, you say, that's not what I meant. Obviously that is content that should be available for me to purchase with ISK, just like always.
That would be exactly correct, just like ship skins will be content that will be available for you to purchase with ISK.
You also have the option to pay for them more directly with cash if you are ISK poor... just as you currently have the option to buy a PLEX with cash and use the ISK you make from selling it to buy a spiffy new Tier 3 BC.
I'm sorry, your argument just doesn't hold water. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
745
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:04:00 -
[60] - Quote
Written Word wrote:Of course its going to be in the NeX store. They might be reasonably priced. Because of all the other items on the NeX that are reasonably priced such as
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |
|

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
141
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:05:00 -
[61] - Quote
It doesn't really matter if ship skins are destructible or not. I seriously doubt they will be. But if you're the only guy in a fleet standing out like the Backdoor Bandit, guess who is going to get shot first. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Fionaa
Quantum Link Company
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:08:00 -
[62] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:From a different poster: Quote:I pay for my sub and i kinda take for granted that new game contet is what i keep paying eve online for, but maybe Im just fooling myself. Okay, taking you seriously, by your definition the 4 new BC's coming next expansion should be provided to you for free as part of your subscription fee.
Your absolutly right I have to admit. But when you price the stuff in the nex store that high ccp are expecting people to buy plex. Now if i was able to convert 1 million isk into idk 100aurum to buy that pixel i could accept it.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
226
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:11:00 -
[63] - Quote
Fionaa wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:From a different poster: Quote:I pay for my sub and i kinda take for granted that new game contet is what i keep paying eve online for, but maybe Im just fooling myself. Okay, taking you seriously, by your definition the 4 new BC's coming next expansion should be provided to you for free as part of your subscription fee. Your absolutly right I have to admit. But when you price the stuff in the nex store that high ccp are expecting people to buy plex. Now if i was able to convert 1 million isk into idk 100aurum to buy that pixel i could accept it.
Yeah, I agree. That's why I pointed out they really, really need to get a realistic pricing scheme.
And ffs make all the items destructible as well as cheaper. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Hallorin
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:12:00 -
[64] - Quote
Hershman wrote:
You are a fool if you believe a few vanity paint jobs are a substantial feature. Look at all of the new features coming this winter that are NOT on Nex.
Agreed.
If all (or even most) of the stuff in the planning right now makes it to the expansion, and then they threw in some reasonably priced ship skins on NeX, I for one would say...
"Thank you CCP, for a great expansion."
But, I'll say it again -- reasonably priced for a repeat purchase should be quite small, like 100 AUR or less. More than that and I won't be upset exactly, but more mystified.
CCP has an opportunity here to sell ship skins really cheap. So cheap that everyone will use them. And once everyone is using them and ships explode, then eventually they will buy more. As opposed to overpriced items only a few use a few times before they decide it's not worth it. I get why the original NeX items were so expensive -- they were one time purchases and if they were cheap, they'd flood the market and, being permanent, people would stop buying. But ship skins are a whole different animal. People can buy again and again and again. If CCP was smart these would be 100 AUR for a 3 run BPC.
Then even brand new players and trials would decide to pay 10 mil occasionally for a cool kaalakiota Caracal. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
226
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:14:00 -
[65] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:It doesn't really matter if ship skins are destructible or not. I seriously doubt they will be. But if you're the only guy in a fleet standing out like the Backdoor Bandit, guess who is going to get shot first.
Heya.
I have to point out that the only way you will "stand out" in a fleet is if the overview labels you differently from other ships with normal paint schemes.
Now you made a good point, as I think initially they were going to make the Ishukone Watch scorp show up by that name on the over view... which in my opinion (as well as yours I think) is a big mistake.
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
226
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:17:00 -
[66] - Quote
Oh, on a related note.
I want custom ship skins to show up on kill mails.  To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Hallorin
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:19:00 -
[67] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Written Word wrote:Of course its going to be in the NeX store. They might be reasonably priced. Because of all the other items on the NeX that are reasonably priced such as
Ahhh, but ship skins, if destructible, are very different. They don't have to be expensive for CCP to make a killing. In fact, the opposite is probably true.
And hopefully CCP will realize this.
|

Hershman
G-Weezy
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:19:00 -
[68] - Quote
No, I actually would rather them price skins fairly high. As I stated in another thread already, this is why:
Hershman wrote:Now, if new ship colors were presented as freebies instead of valued customizations, then everyone would color their ships. When everyone colors their ship the effect of producing a colored ship is diminished in value. In contrast, having more value in ship color adds additional dynamic to the amount of isk lost from a kill mail. Dynamics make things more interesting
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
226
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:22:00 -
[69] - Quote
Hallorin wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Written Word wrote:Of course its going to be in the NeX store. They might be reasonably priced. Because of all the other items on the NeX that are reasonably priced such as Ahhh, but ship skins, if destructible, are very different. They don't have to be expensive for CCP to make a killing. In fact, the opposite is probably true. And hopefully CCP will realize this.
Indeed.
Actually I hope they make all clothing behave like clothing.
As in:
1: Not cost millions. 2: Need to be taken with you if you expect to wear it at your destination. 3: Blows up if the star ship or pod it is in, (or the body it is on depending on your interpretation of proper pod apparel) is blown up around it.
Edit: If in cargo, has a chance to drop like everything else. (That's some damn sturdy luggage he had). And if they blow up your pod, it's gone gone. Unless they implement harvesting corpses for bio mass and implants, then add the clothing worn into the mix as well. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Hershman
G-Weezy
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:26:00 -
[70] - Quote
From the other thread again
Hershman wrote:
A spray can of each color can be added for 500 AUR.
Maybe 3 uses per can of spray paint.
350m isk = 1 PLEX = 3,500 AUR - (3,500/500) * 3 = 21 Painted ships or 16.6m ISK per Ship
|
|

Hershman
G-Weezy
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:28:00 -
[71] - Quote
By the way, don't forget that Items on Nex are also sold on the market by players. If you don't want to use AUR... you dont need to!  |

Jenshae Chiroptera
150
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:35:00 -
[72] - Quote
I will be disappointed if they make the default paint jobs (such as the camo rubbish) default then expect us to buy real paint. Either way, I will probably avoid the ships. Simply won't use the NEX store, even with the free Aurum Ideas & stuff No matter the changes, high sec people chose the safests. Lots of stick and they will leave. Half the problem is the players in null sec; we do not want to be there with you. |

Hershman
G-Weezy
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:38:00 -
[73] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:I will be disappointed if they make the paint jobs (such as the camo rubbish) default then expect us to buy real paint. Either way, I will probably avoid the ships. Simply won't use the NEX store, even with the free Aurum
With your rapidly deteriorating interest in EVE (and everything else) maybe you should just quit, Can I have your stuff?  |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
226
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:43:00 -
[74] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:I will be disappointed if they make the paint jobs (such as the camo rubbish) default then expect us to buy real paint. Either way, I will probably avoid the ships. Simply won't use the NEX store, even with the free Aurum
See, that's the really good part. If you don't want to buy anything... don't.
Keep in mind also that the "camo rubbish" has always been the default skin for the Gallante Navy ships. There was simply an exception that has apparently been brought into line... which makes sense (even though I am not fond of that color scheme either). To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Soldarius
Peek-A-Boo Bombers
72
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:45:00 -
[75] - Quote
For the record, I'm totally for ship skins in the NeX. It is definitely a vanity item, and it doesn't affect game play other than to draw attention to yourself. Corp/alliance skins would be cool. What people need to realize is that it should cost for every ship. You don't repaint your car for free, do you? It costs you in time and/or money. So should it in EvE.
Since ships explode frequently, I don't think that skins should be expensive, unless you want a custom job. Those can and should be more expensive. So let's see some generic palette-shifted skins to start. Cost = standard ship version + aur and gives you your reskinned ship.
I also see no reason why you shouldn't be able to reskin an already reskinned ship.
Reskinned ships should probably only be sold on contract to preserve the new skin. Otherwise, like rigs, when the ship is repackaged, it is lost and the ship reverts to its standard skinned version. "How do you kill that which has no life?" |

Richard Aiel
Point of No Return Waterboard
31
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:57:00 -
[76] - Quote
Yeah they go this route, Im out. Star Trek Online tried the same thing.
Plus, if they havent learned their lesson with this NeX crap yet, then itll be good. Theyll be showing us they dont care about this game anymore (as a big chunk of the losses this summber was from this bullshit) and I wont be buying into that. "If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave." Quoth the Hillmar |

Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation RONA Directorate
234
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:57:00 -
[77] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:Ship skin = Vanity. I have no issue at all with it being on the Nex market. If your ship is destroyed however, you need to buy a new skin. Thats my view.
And this is why people will suicide skinned ships.
Edit: I do support skinned ships as long as it costs the original ship, or the minerals to build the original ship. And the stats do not differ from the t1 varients.
IE. Roden shipyards mega will have the same stats as a tech 1 mega. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
227
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:00:00 -
[78] - Quote
Richard Aiel wrote:Yeah they go this route, Im out. Star Trek Online tried the same thing.
Not even close. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
227
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:03:00 -
[79] - Quote
Obsidian Hawk wrote:Montevius Williams wrote:Ship skin = Vanity. I have no issue at all with it being on the Nex market. If your ship is destroyed however, you need to buy a new skin. Thats my view. And this is why people will suicide skinned ships. Edit: I do support skinned ships as long as it costs the original ship, or the minerals to build the original ship. And the stats do not differ from the t1 varients. IE. Roden shipyards mega will have the same stats as a tech 1 mega.
If they take the time to visually look over their target (and in a suicide gank situation they probably will) you are likely correct.
Just like they do expensive ships likely supporting expensive equipment.
This is a good thing.
Besides, if you want to wear the bling, you obviously WANT to draw attention to yourself.  To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Richard Aiel
Point of No Return Waterboard
31
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:04:00 -
[80] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Richard Aiel wrote:Yeah they go this route, Im out. Star Trek Online tried the same thing.
Not even close.
really.... wanna elaborate on that?
https://www.startrekonline.com/store
click on "ships"
Those are vanity only skins for ships. "If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave." Quoth the Hillmar |
|

Cannibal Kane
Count With Teddy Mercenaries
61
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:05:00 -
[81] - Quote
If they do this... I will want a Hello Kitty skin to put on my Vindicator just to IRK people. The Crazy South African.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
227
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:06:00 -
[82] - Quote
Richard Aiel wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Richard Aiel wrote:Yeah they go this route, Im out. Star Trek Online tried the same thing.
Not even close. really.... wanna elaborate on that? https://www.startrekonline.com/storeclick on "ships" Those are vanity only skins for ships.
They also sold ships that you could not get any other way... that is what pissed people off. Not the paint jobs.
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Richard Aiel
Point of No Return Waterboard
31
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:13:00 -
[83] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Richard Aiel wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Richard Aiel wrote:Yeah they go this route, Im out. Star Trek Online tried the same thing.
Not even close. really.... wanna elaborate on that? https://www.startrekonline.com/storeclick on "ships" Those are vanity only skins for ships. They also sold ships that you could not get any other way... that is what pissed people off. Not the paint jobs.
Technically no, you get them by grinding months and months of in game missions. Its insane and stupid but you can still do it. I cant even remember what the hell you do to get them but theyre available in game.
But yes, ppl got pissed cause they thought they couldnt get them in game. They by the time they realized you could, there was really noone playing the game lol "If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave." Quoth the Hillmar |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
100
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:18:00 -
[84] - Quote
Fionaa wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:From a different poster: Quote:I pay for my sub and i kinda take for granted that new game contet is what i keep paying eve online for, but maybe Im just fooling myself. Okay, taking you seriously, by your definition the 4 new BC's coming next expansion should be provided to you for free as part of your subscription fee. Your absolutly right I have to admit. But when you price the stuff in the nex store that high ccp are expecting people to buy plex. Now if i was able to convert 1 million isk into idk 100aurum to buy that pixel i could accept it. No, that is not absolutely right. The new ships are being added to the game via the sandbox gamplay that is at the core of EVE. You either make it yourself or someone else makes it for you. If they were given to you for free then that would circumvent the sandbox gamplay that you are paying your sub for. Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
150
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:18:00 -
[85] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:If they do this... I will want a Hello Kitty skin to put on my Vindicator just to IRK people.
You think other people are going to look at your ship? Maybe griefers to check who cares and will give them more tears. Besides which, there are copy right problems with that. Ideas & stuff No matter the changes, high sec people chose the safests. Lots of stick and they will leave. Half the problem is the players in null sec; we do not want to be there with you. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
261
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:21:00 -
[86] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Besides which, there are copy right problems with that.
That's why for Christmas we need a Pink Kitty skin for the Drake. |

Richard Aiel
Point of No Return Waterboard
31
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:22:00 -
[87] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Cannibal Kane wrote:If they do this... I will want a Hello Kitty skin to put on my Vindicator just to IRK people. You think other people are going to look at your ship? Maybe griefers to check who cares and will give them more tears. Besides which, there are copy right problems with that.
lol copyright issues?
Look at corp names some day. Youd be profitting more from the corp name than you would be from the paint job on your ship.
Hell for once instance, "Band of Brothers" was a copyright of HBO You saw how much CCP cared about that infringement
"If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave." Quoth the Hillmar |

The Offerer
Republic University Minmatar Republic
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:27:00 -
[88] - Quote
Regular ship + AUR generated skin = Painted ship.
I see no problem there as long as you're not buying skinned ships directly for AUR.
The only slight annoyance that would cause me not to buy ship skins at all would be the utterly high AUR price, but then I would not ragequit, but rather ignore the feature until the price gets reasonable.
$1 (approx. 233 AUR) for a skin that gets destroyed when the ship is blown up is totally reasonable. Anything higher than that and I'll probably skip the feature completely. |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
100
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:31:00 -
[89] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Tristan North wrote:What about nebulae sold by nex? And new ship models, and engine trails. Vanity stuff, isn't it? No, none of the above are vanity items. Nebulae are part of the environment. So Ranger1 we finally see where you draw the line in the sand on the NEX Store.
Just one problem with your response, does the new nebulae's have any effect on gamplay in any way shape or form? No, they are for all intents and purpose pure vanity.
If clothing and ship paint/logos are vanity because they have no effect on gameplay, then there is a lot of scope for things in EVE to be put in the NEX Store.
This is one of the other problems with the NEX Store, where do you draw the line between what is vanity and what is not, because from your response it's looking pretty thin and vague.
Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

Noriko Mai
278
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:31:00 -
[90] - Quote
Richard Aiel wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Cannibal Kane wrote:If they do this... I will want a Hello Kitty skin to put on my Vindicator just to IRK people. You think other people are going to look at your ship? Maybe griefers to check who cares and will give them more tears. Besides which, there are copy right problems with that. lol copyright issues? Look at corp names some day. Youd be profitting more from the corp name than you would be from the paint job on your ship. Hell for once instance, "Band of Brothers" was a copyright of HBO You saw how much CCP cared about that infringement
User generated Content like Corpnames is something completly different. If they let users make the skins themselves, then I think there will be no problem with copyright, see: User-generated content But with flying dicks, of couse. |
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
227
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:37:00 -
[91] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:Fionaa wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:From a different poster: Quote:I pay for my sub and i kinda take for granted that new game contet is what i keep paying eve online for, but maybe Im just fooling myself. Okay, taking you seriously, by your definition the 4 new BC's coming next expansion should be provided to you for free as part of your subscription fee. Your absolutly right I have to admit. But when you price the stuff in the nex store that high ccp are expecting people to buy plex. Now if i was able to convert 1 million isk into idk 100aurum to buy that pixel i could accept it. No, that is not absolutely right. The new ships are being added to the game via the sandbox gamplay that is at the core of EVE. You either make it yourself or someone else makes it for you. If they were given to you for free then that would circumvent the sandbox gamplay that you are paying your sub for.
Which was rather my point, and the point Fionaa agreed with.
You pay your sub for new content.
Sometimes that content is environmental or a game mechanic. Sometimes that content (like the new BC's) is something you can make or someone else made or obtained (IE faction ships or BPCs for those ships from the LP store) to buy with ISK.
The NeX will either sell BPC's (or their equivalent) for paint jobs or will have player made items (ships, PI items, whatever) as part of the purchase price along with ISK or cash, which ever you prefer. PLEX can be purchased with either.
It is simply new content that you can purchase, and exactly like the new BC's you can spend either ISK to get the BP or ship itself... or you can spend cash to get it by buying and selling a PLEX. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
227
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:46:00 -
[92] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Tristan North wrote:What about nebulae sold by nex? And new ship models, and engine trails. Vanity stuff, isn't it? No, none of the above are vanity items. Nebulae are part of the environment. So Ranger1 we finally see where you draw the line in the sand on the NEX Store. Just one problem with your response, does the new nebulae's have any effect on gamplay in any way shape or form? No, they are for all intents and purpose pure vanity. If clothing and ship paint/logos are vanity because they have no effect on gameplay, then there is a lot of scope for things in EVE to be put in the NEX Store. This is one of the other problems with the NEX Store, where do you draw the line between what is vanity and what is not, because from your response it's looking pretty thin and vague.
I can't buy and personally own a Nebulae, it is part of the environment. Vanity items are things that you can purchase and own. If you have difficulty understanding that, I'm sorry. For most I think that is pretty cut and dried. 
Granted, "The Ranger" nebulae has kind of a ring to it. 
You are correct, CCP is restricting themselves to a very strict interpretation of what they will sell in the NeX. I don't fault them for this, there is a lot of unthinking hysteria about "pay to win" items. Most people don't even understand the definition of the term.
However, that is their choice and it is probably a wise one... firmly based in customer feed back.
Which, I presume, is exactly what you want.  To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
102
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 06:20:00 -
[93] - Quote
In reality Aurum should have been purely used by EVE players to fund the war efforts in Dust514, a game which is being setup from scratch as a F2P themepark/psuedo sandbox with microtransactions.
Personally I can't understand how CCP and some players are satisfied with the mediocre delivery of items into the sandbox of EVE via the NEX Store. With how CCP has handled the NEX, all they've done is alienate a whole lot of people both in the game and outside of it. Be Fearless CCP and show that you have the cherries to maintain the integrity of EVE as a sandbox game.
Put the NEX items back into the players hands by having them manufactured by them and destructable.
Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

Solhild
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
52
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 06:20:00 -
[94] - Quote
NeX is a bad idea - pure and simple.
Subscription is for content Subscription means active players generating and destroying isk Subscription allows some players to sell isk/time from other players with PLEX PLEX supplements income for CCP
NeX only allows content for cash Content is immersion and enhances player experiences
I've always been uncomfortable with the vanity only argument as it means you only get the full content experience if you pay more and more cash.
If we were building the game without this consideration, ship skins/logos, etc. would probably be earned from LP, be awarded for completing missions, running a corp, or having great standings - NeX means all of those options and game depth are replaced by cash 
|

Solhild
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
52
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 06:22:00 -
[95] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:In reality Aurum should have been purely used by EVE players to fund the war efforts in Dust514, a game which is being setup from scratch as a F2P themepark/psuedo sandbox with microtransactions.
Personally I can't understand how CCP and some players are satisfied with the mediocre delivery of items into the sandbox of EVE via the NEX Store. With how CCP has handled the NEX, all they've done is alienate a whole lot of people both in the game and outside of it. Be Fearless CCP and show that you have the cherries to maintain the integrity of EVE as a sandbox game.
Put the NEX items back into the players hands by having them manufactured by them and destructable.
Spot on  |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
262
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 06:25:00 -
[96] - Quote
Solhild wrote:NeX allows content for Aurum, thus ISK.Content is immersion and enhances player experiences I've always been uncomfortable with the vanity only argument as it means you only get the full content experience if you pay more and more Aurum, thus ISK.If we were building the game without this consideration, ship skins/logos, etc. would probably be earned from LP, be awarded for completing missions, running a corp, or having great standings - NeX means all of those options and game depth are replaced by Aurum, thus ISK. FYP.
Don't pay a cent if you don't want to. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
150
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 06:25:00 -
[97] - Quote
Richard Aiel wrote:
lol copyright issues?
Look at corp names some day. Youd be profitting more from the corp name than you would be from the paint job on your ship.
Hell for once instance, "Band of Brothers" was a copyright of HBO You saw how much CCP cared about that infringement
Players and the names they make are not the same as CCP making things with branded and copy righted material. Tracking down and suing you all instead of one company is a whole lot more difficult. Ideas & stuff No matter the changes, high sec people chose the safests. Lots of stick and they will leave. Half the problem is the players in null sec; we do not want to be there with you. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
227
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 06:26:00 -
[98] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:In reality Aurum should have been purely used by EVE players to fund the war efforts in Dust514, a game which is being setup from scratch as a F2P themepark/psuedo sandbox with microtransactions.
Personally I can't understand how CCP and some players are satisfied with the mediocre delivery of items into the sandbox of EVE via the NEX Store. With how CCP has handled the NEX, all they've done is alienate a whole lot of people both in the game and outside of it. Be Fearless CCP and show that you have the cherries to maintain the integrity of EVE as a sandbox game.
Put the NEX items back into the players hands by having them manufactured by them and destructable.
I can agree with everything but the first sentence.
You are correct, up to now the implementation and presentation of the NeX store has been handled very, very badly.
And yes, CCP has already indicated that player driven industry must be part of the NeX... specifically in regards to ship skins. There are rumbles that it could extend to clothing as well (and it should).
I'm hoping ships skins will be the issue that finally changes their minds about NeX items being indestructible, and consequently change their thinking about current price points. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
227
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 06:28:00 -
[99] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Solhild wrote:NeX allows content for Aurum, thus ISK.Content is immersion and enhances player experiences I've always been uncomfortable with the vanity only argument as it means you only get the full content experience if you pay more and more Aurum, thus ISK.If we were building the game without this consideration, ship skins/logos, etc. would probably be earned from LP, be awarded for completing missions, running a corp, or having great standings - NeX means all of those options and game depth are replaced by Aurum, thus ISK. FYP. Don't pay a cent if you don't want to.
Thank you, you saved me the trouble.  To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Cur
Militaris Industries Cascade Imminent
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 06:28:00 -
[100] - Quote
if CCP had of released the first items in the NeX store as ship skins the whole unsub thing probablywouldent have been anywhere near as bad, and possibly not have happend at all.
I understand CCP is in need of more funding, i am perfectly OK , and WILL put IRL money into the game for ship skins as long as they do not try to be greedy (like they did with the Monocle...) and try to sell a single paint color for $90 irl or something stupid like $10 per skin that can only be applied once.
So CCP - Your'e call on if we buy it or not. Still think greed is good? heh
and CCP also missed the point on "micro" transactions
Its small transactions (1-5$) made lots of times - by alot of people = big bucks
Being greedy fucks = only idiots buy, and not THAT many people are idiots, so in the long run CCP looses out from their greed. |
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
227
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 06:30:00 -
[101] - Quote
Cur wrote:if CCP had of released the first items in the NeX store as ship skins the whole unsub thing probablywouldent have been anywhere near as bad, and possibly not have happend at all.
I understand CCP is in need of more funding, i am perfectly OK , and WILL put IRL money into the game for ship skins as long as they do not try to be greedy (like they did with the Monocle...) and try to sell a single paint color for $90 irl or something stupid like $10 per skin that can only be applied once.
So CCP - Your'e call on if we buy it or not. Still think greed is good? heh
and CCP also missed the point on "micro" transactions
Its small transactions (1-5$) made lots of times - by alot of people = big bucks
Being greedy fucks = only idiots buy, and not THAT many people are idiots, so in the long run CCP looses out from their greed.
Pretty much right there with ya. Just don't forget, you need not spend a dime of real cash on a NeX item.
Edit: Also remember, they wanted to include at least one ship skin at the beginning, but they couldn't get the Scorpion as part of the price thing to work (or their alternative the BPC sale of the ship skin to work properly). At least not then. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Cur
Militaris Industries Cascade Imminent
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 07:04:00 -
[102] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:
Pretty much right there with ya. Just don't forget, you need not spend a dime of real cash on a NeX item.
Edit: Also remember, they wanted to include at least one ship skin at the beginning, but they couldn't get the Scorpion as part of the price thing to work (or their alternative the BPC sale of the ship skin to work properly). At least not then.
There's got to be another way other than to make a seperate ship with its own color, that would just be stupid.
and i dont mind supporting CCP with cash - as long as they're not greedy with their approach to selling it. |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
47
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 07:34:00 -
[103] - Quote
expecting consistency ?
Hardly...
People who were raged by "barbies" in EVE and NeX are raged about missile launchers hardpoints not visible, raged about skins of ships, raged about models of ships... All its just visual ...
Consistency ? Non.
Anyway as far as NeX goes... depend on pricing and how it would be managed... Aka "Ishkune Scorpion" |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
102
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 07:43:00 -
[104] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Azahni Vah'nos wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Tristan North wrote:What about nebulae sold by nex? And new ship models, and engine trails. Vanity stuff, isn't it? No, none of the above are vanity items. Nebulae are part of the environment. So Ranger1 we finally see where you draw the line in the sand on the NEX Store. Just one problem with your response, does the new nebulae's have any effect on gamplay in any way shape or form? No, they are for all intents and purpose pure vanity. If clothing and ship paint/logos are vanity because they have no effect on gameplay, then there is a lot of scope for things in EVE to be put in the NEX Store. This is one of the other problems with the NEX Store, where do you draw the line between what is vanity and what is not, because from your response it's looking pretty thin and vague. I can't buy and personally own a Nebulae, it is part of the environment. Vanity items are things that you can purchase and own. If you have difficulty understanding that, I'm sorry. For most I think that is pretty cut and dried.  Granted, "The Ranger" nebulae has kind of a ring to it.  You are correct, CCP is restricting themselves to a very strict interpretation of what they will sell in the NeX. I don't fault them for this, there is a lot of unthinking hysteria about "pay to win" items. Most people don't even understand the definition of the term. However, that is their choice and it is probably a wise one... firmly based in customer feed back. Which, I presume, is exactly what you want.  EVE is an online game, you don't 'own' anything. 
Not so cut and dried, because that is your interpretation.
Nebulae are still a visual part of the game the same as clothing or ship skins, just different pixels. What purpose do the new Nebulae serve? well they are pretty to look at, seems like vanity to me. If I really wanted to stretch it I could say that most of the game is vanity.
Do you need the game to look pretty, it doesn't stop you from playing the game does it?
p.s. I'm sure there would also be RP'ers out there who would argue that items such as clothing are part of their environment.
And just in case you weren't sure yes I'm playing Devil's advocate. Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

Cur
Militaris Industries Cascade Imminent
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 07:46:00 -
[105] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:expecting consistency ?
Hardly...
People who were raged by "barbies" in EVE and NeX are raged about missile launchers hardpoints not visible, raged about skins of ships, raged about models of ships... All its just visual ...
Consistency ? Non.
Anyway as far as NeX goes... depend on pricing and how it would be managed... Aka "Ishkune Scorpion"
Consistancy yes. We cannot interact with other people to strut our stuff in said fancy clothes and monocles, we're stuck with a mediocre sized FORCED chest-up view. So the only person that can see your jazzy pants and shoes is again, yourself.
If WiS had of been released with the ability to walk around the entire station, with other players, it would have been a huge hit. Instead CCP chose to send us a half cooked piece of rancid fish and forced it down our throats. Had the players not have stood up and taken CCP out the back door for a good beating, they would have effectively killed 90% of the playerbase with food poisoning.
Now that we've given the Chef a wakeup call and a pair of glasses and forced him to quit smoking so he has his sense of smell back, they're cooking up a hearty meal.
So yeah, there is one hell of a big difference between what all the fuss was about with WiS and how people are looking at the seemingly certain fact that ship skins are going to be a NeX Item. There are more changes, stuff that's been on the "to do" list, and lets face it, the ammount of changes/fixes/new stuff coming in this winter expansion is more than we've seen from CCP in the last year's worth of patches combined.
So no, we dont mind the ship skins in the NeX store because our precious isnt getting neglected because of it, and they're not putting the effort into barbie's clothes that can only be seen when you lock yourself in the solitary confinement cell that is called WiS. |

Hallorin
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 07:52:00 -
[106] - Quote
Cur wrote:if CCP had of released the first items in the NeX store as ship skins the whole unsub thing probablywouldent have been anywhere near as bad, and possibly not have happend at all.
I understand CCP is in need of more funding, i am perfectly OK , and WILL put IRL money into the game for ship skins as long as they do not try to be greedy (like they did with the Monocle...) and try to sell a single paint color for $90 irl or something stupid like $10 per skin that can only be applied once.
So CCP - Your'e call on if we buy it or not. Still think greed is good? heh
and CCP also missed the point on "micro" transactions
Its small transactions (1-5$) made lots of times - by alot of people = big bucks
Being greedy fucks = only idiots buy, and not THAT many people are idiots, so in the long run CCP looses out from their greed.
It's not that hard to understand why CCP charged what they did actually, and I don't think it was about greed in the way some think. With the limited selection of items they had, combined with the fact that these items could not be destroyed and had no need to be repeatedly purchased, CCP almost had no choice but to put a high price point on the items.
If they had been cheap, everyone would have them all in no time, and nobody would be buying aurum anyways. Of course this is what happened anyways especially with the free aurum giveaways but that just shows how doomed a poorly stocked indestructible item nex store was from the start.
Ships skins are, in a sense, what the nex store should always have been about. Items that players will repeatedly purchase and can be sold for very small amounts. Similarly, if the nex store had contained hundreds of clothing options (especially if they were destructible) they could have been sold very cheaply. Then, converting a plex wouldn't have bought up every item.
I'm not saying I agree with CCPs plans at all, but given the recent financial problems the company has had, I think it's clear that it wasn't all about greed. In some ways it was about financial survival. But in that respect, if they ahd really wanted the Nex store to work, what it needed was:
cheap items LOTS of items items that would be repeatedly purchased
Ship skins are the first chance to actually do this |

Grukni
Shimai of New Eden N E X O
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 08:27:00 -
[107] - Quote
CCP could release resources from working on skins for the NeX store an provide ppl tools to create their own skins. Players then could send their creations to CCP for approval and inclusion in NeX. Other players could buy them and authors get some ISK for each sale while CCP sees an Aurum purchase.
However, I don't see this happening since the amount of work required is inmense. |

luZk
Jaegerkorpset
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 09:25:00 -
[108] - Quote
I would like to see player designs sold as a BPO's.
You make a skin/design and submit it, when CCP has verified it's not full of naked ladies ect. youll get a BPO for that skin. Submitting a design could cost 1 plex or 3500 AUR.
When building skins from the BPO you would build from AUR and get "skin rigs" for the "skin rig slot". This way you could have a unique product selling zebra striped rifters or whatever rocks your boat.
I suggest something like these prices for building skin rigs.
Frig skin rig cost of 100 AUR. Cruiser skin rig cost of 250 AUR. Battleship skin rig cost of 500 AUR.
|

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
266
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 10:02:00 -
[109] - Quote
luZk wrote:I would like to see player designs sold as a BPO's.
You make a skin/design and submit it, when CCP has verified it's not full of naked ladies ect. youll get a BPO for that skin. Submitting a design could cost 1 plex or 3500 AUR.
When building skins from the BPO you would build from AUR and get "skin rigs" for the "skin rig slot". This way you could have a unique product selling zebra striped rifters or whatever rocks your boat.
I suggest something like these prices for building skin rigs.
Frig skin rig cost of 100 AUR. Cruiser skin rig cost of 250 AUR. Battleship skin rig cost of 500 AUR.
Yes, but then ship skins will need to be streamed to everyone on grid. Either than, or players with a custom skin have a boring, 'generic' design.
In any case, the amount of effort will be huge.
Ship skins need a devoted interface, or store, in order to be most effective. Putting all the skins on the market will be cluttery. The devoted interface can be through a new fitting rig/hardpoint, a station service, etc. The NeX store, being designed for vanity items, is most suitable for ship skins at this time. |

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 10:09:00 -
[110] - Quote
I don't think destructible one-use skins will be a big success. I expect quite a few players will buy them initially, but once the novelty wears off they will stop.
A better implementation imo is for the NeX store to sell players the rights to use a particular skin - a licensing model rather than a sale model. Once you have bought the license you can apply the skin as many times as you like, but it requires consumable resources each time (paint etc) and these are produced in-game by players. Seems to be win-win to me. |
|

Arugas Koken
Peregrine Guard
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 10:13:00 -
[111] - Quote
Agree with OP |

Adelphie
Paradox Collective
36
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 10:19:00 -
[112] - Quote
I personally am all for vanity rmt ... mainly because I think it will improve eve as a whole.
If we work with the following assumptions we can see how good this is for the rest of the game:
CCP would only implement vanity RMT if it was profitable
Vanity items will not bring new players to the game, but enrich the game for those already playing
Improved gameplay featues attracts new players.
To make VRMT more profitable CCP need to attract more players to the game. To attract more player to the game the game itself needs to improve. The more profit VRMT makes the more can be reinvested in the game.
BUT
The moment a gold ammo situation happens I'll be amongst the first to leave. |

Grukni
Shimai of New Eden N E X O
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 10:20:00 -
[113] - Quote
Imryn Xaran wrote:I don't think destructible one-use skins will be a big success. I expect quite a few players will buy them initially, but once the novelty wears off they will stop.
A better implementation imo is for the NeX store to sell players the rights to use a particular skin - a licensing model rather than a sale model. Once you have bought the license you can apply the skin as many times as you like, but it requires consumable resources each time (paint etc) and these are produced in-game by players. Seems to be win-win to me.
I think the key point is to let players get somehow involved in the process. This is what most players want for the sandbox. I gave my point about player created (and CCP approved) skins. However, I have to admit that I'm not really a fan of increasing the number of ship skins because it can look ridiculous and it can make it difficult to recognize the type of a ship (as now different types share the same hull) |

Rellik B00n
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
15
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 10:22:00 -
[114] - Quote
what is this Nex you speak of?
can you shoot it? |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
772
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 10:45:00 -
[115] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Jada Maroo wrote:This, to me, is one of those "watch what they do vs what they say" moments.
If, after admitting that NEX was a terribly designed mistake that ended in absolute failure, CCP then decides to massively expand NEX by adding ship skins then we will know by their actions that they don't regret NEX at all -- they just regret that we didn't all drop to our knees and blow them for it. If they were going to go this route they would have removed the NeX by now. They are desperate for something that players actually want to buy to put in the NeX.
Its possible they sacked all the people that programmed it and don't want to waste time training new ones to remove that cancer.
+ removing NeX (though lots of people want it gone) is a complicated business. You need to ask what happens to the things people bought for real money - what happens to the free aurum, what happens to the content from the NeX store. How is it properly reintegrated into the game etc.
I very much wish there was a "press red button and remove NeX from eve" option - but I think its a bit more complicated than that.
That said, I will rage if ship skins go in the NeX store and probably unsub accounts again simply because we have paid for the the ship designer salaries with our subscription money and anyone who thinks CCP actually have outsourced new ship skin design to some 3rd party (not paid with eve subs) band of roaming custom ship skin design ronin is frankly a credulous idiot.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

My Postman
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 11:03:00 -
[116] - Quote
OP:
Ship skins may be on the NexShop and i can-¦t care less. All i hope is that they are destructable, so that someone can bring up "skinsageddon", where i defenatly will join.
Let the haters destroy every single painted hull, to maximise CCP-¦s profit. I want a pink domi for FREE. |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
106
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 11:03:00 -
[117] - Quote
Adelphie wrote:I personally am all for vanity rmt ... mainly because I think it will improve eve as a whole.
If we work with the following assumptions we can see how good this is for the rest of the game:
CCP would only implement vanity RMT if it was profitable
Vanity items will not bring new players to the game, but enrich the game for those already playing
Improved gameplay featues attracts new players.
To make VRMT more profitable CCP need to attract more players to the game. To attract more player to the game the game itself needs to improve. The more profit VRMT makes the more can be reinvested in the game.
BUT
The moment a gold ammo situation happens I'll be amongst the first to leave. Where is this enrichment of the game you speak of, because all I see is the watering down of content and features to enable microtransactions.
Also if you think all the money will be reinvested back into EVE then you need to read up on overcapitalisation.
Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
772
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 11:08:00 -
[118] - Quote
And to the op
Ship skins should not be in the NeX store. They should be introduced to the game through traditional player content and should come from loyalty store offers (from the appropriate factions) from drops from pirates, from exploration content, from invention however else you can think of that involves players playing the game and making these things for sale to other players and thus preserving the eve economic sandbox.
Eve does not need more Microtransactions. It already has PLEX. Stop encouraging the idiotic pro MT faction in CCP to make more critical errors in their business planning. Eve Online is not like other games, it has a different focus, a different appeal. It sells to people that like the idea of a player-led economic conflict sandbox with a minimum of outside interference. Eve does not need NeX-provided content that short-circuits the sandbox.
Discussions about P2W/Vanity etc miss this essential point. It does damage the integrity of the economic simulation when content is delivered in a way that bypasses the activity of players. It is cheating players of opportunity to an in-game business of providing this stuff. And for a single server economic sandbox like Eve Online GÇô that is just stupid.
So to your reasons to apologize for NeX/Ship skins.
I would hate ship skins being in the NeX store. (just as I hate the NeX store itself being in the client.
1. I do not consider myself an GÇ£idiotGÇ¥
2. I do not want Incarna removed from the game, I want Incarna decoupled from NeX and NeX removed from the game.
3. I hate the NeX store because it represents a corrosive short-changing of the Eve player led economy and foot in the door for greedy MT schemes to the great detriment of Eve Online.
I am very happy for other players to have GÇ£black drakesGÇ¥ or GÇ£flashing light cometsGÇ¥ but these things must be gained through traditional gameplay by somebody who then puts it on the market. If cash rich/isk poor fat cat players wish to buy these things let them buy and sell plex to afford the process of buying the skins they like from the players who earned these things through gameplay.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
772
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 11:10:00 -
[119] - Quote
My Postman wrote:OP:
Ship skins may be on the NexShop and i can-¦t care less. All i hope is that they are destructable, so that someone can bring up "skinsageddon", where i defenatly will join.
Let the haters destroy every single painted hull, to maximise CCP-¦s profit. I want a pink domi for FREE.
You know perfectly well that people like the OP will be whining immediately for ship skins to be invulnerable because he paid "real money" for it.
He is the type of player who really doesn't "get" Eve and unfortunately CCP envisaged NeX on precisely this misunderstanding of the core product they own.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

My Postman
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 11:15:00 -
[120] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:My Postman wrote:OP:
Ship skins may be on the NexShop and i can-¦t care less. All i hope is that they are destructable, so that someone can bring up "skinsageddon", where i defenatly will join.
Let the haters destroy every single painted hull, to maximise CCP-¦s profit. I want a pink domi for FREE. You know perfectly well that people like the OP will be whining immediately for ship skins to be invulnerable because he paid "real money" for it. He is the type of player who really doesn't "get" Eve and unfortunately CCP envisaged NeX on precisely this misunderstanding of the core product they own.
Lol. As the op said you can convert isk - plex - aur - shiny ship. So there might be RL money involved or not. My bets on that it does-¦nt make any difference in the amount of tears.
But i can support the rest of your post. |
|

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
267
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 11:19:00 -
[121] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote: Where is this enrichment of the game you speak of, because all I see is the watering down of content and features to enable microtransactions.
Watering down of content? No. More content is being added. Watering down of features? No. Addition of features. Clearly, you see wrong. You can even access these 'microtransactions' by buying a PLEX with ISK, if you desire.
And what's wrong with microtransactions for vanity, if they can be purchased with a supply/demand affected in-game currency? EVE is already rampant with the effects of out of game forces. The 'sandbox' is already gone. Just look at PLEX. You can literally pay to win. Are you complaining about PLEX? Of course not. You're complaining about ship skins and pants.
Even your signature is totally against the NeX store. When was that all the rage, like 3 months ago? Obviously, you're butthurt. We get it. No need to rub your butthurt in our faces.
Jade Constantine wrote: You know perfectly well that people like the OP will be whining immediately for ship skins to be invulnerable because he paid "real money" for it. He is the type of player who really doesn't "get" Eve and unfortunately CCP envisaged NeX on precisely this misunderstanding of the core product they own.
Being the OP, I know perfectly well that I won't pay real money for vanity items. Or even 'real' items. I haven't bought a PLEX for cash, and are not planning too. Will I skin a Hurricane for PVP? Probably not. Will I skin a Dominix for PVE? Probably. Try again. Or don't. You may embarrass yourself.
Clearly, you're not the player who 'gets' EVE. EVE is the vision of CCP, not YOU. EVE is what CCP make it. If CCP decide that EVE is to have a NeX store, then EVE has a NeX store. I accept whatever damn thing CCP will do with the game, because they aren't screwing things up for me. |

Rellik B00n
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
15
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 11:26:00 -
[122] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: Pretty much right there with ya. Just don't forget, you need not spend a dime of real cash on a NeX item.
And yet in the end CCP are paid in cash for the item, making it a $ purchase outside the sub. Im not arguing for or against the vanity stuff here Im simply stating a fact: it doesnt matter how many times someone says "but you dont have to pay RL monies for it!" As you effectively ARE spending RL money on it, just not necessarily yours!
To put it another way if all stocks of PLEX dried up and no one seeded anymore to market, how would you pay for your vanity item?
Not to mention the stupidity of a link between how players pay for their accounts and how players would choose to pay for a popular vanity item.
edit: see post 43(?) for more |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
267
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 11:37:00 -
[123] - Quote
Rellik B00n wrote:[quote=Ranger 1] And yet in the end CCP are paid in cash for the item, making it a $ purchase outside the sub. Im not arguing for or against the vanity stuff here Im simply stating a fact: it doesnt matter how many times someone says "but you dont have to pay RL monies for it!" As you effectively ARE spending RL money on it, just not necessarily yours!
To put it another way if all stocks of PLEX dried up and no one seeded anymore to market, how would you pay for your vanity item?
It doesn't matter if someone else pays for the vanity item. That's their choice. EVE is full of PLEX, purchasing using cash by players who want extra ISK. CCP is already earning money from a MT system. Why not increase the money earned, by introducing something nice? CCP spend this money on EVE, and EVE gets better. Remember, WoD development has stalled.
By the way, the supply of PLEX can't really dry up . Supply/demand. Low supply of PLEX, and the price skyrockets. Obviously, people will like to take advantage of this, and more PLEX will be bought.
I don't care how ship skins are brought into EVE. That's why I made this thread. I don't want ship skins to be delayed again. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
775
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 11:42:00 -
[124] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote: Watering down of content? No. More content is being added.
While short-circuiting player industry completely. Ship skins via NeX water down the player-led industrial sandbox of eve because its a content provision that has nothing to do with the gameplay of players.
Quote:Watering down of features? No. Addition of features. Clearly, you see wrong. You can even access these 'microtransactions' by buying a PLEX with ISK, if you desire.
You are intentionally missing the point.
Quote:And what's wrong with microtransactions for vanity, if they can be purchased with a supply/demand affected in-game currency?
Because they short circuit player industry in a single server player led industrial sandbox ... not sure how many times people have to repeat this to you before you understand it.
Quote:EVE is already rampant with the effects of out of game forces. The 'sandbox' is already gone. Just look at PLEX. You can literally pay to win. Are you complaining about PLEX? Of course not. You're complaining about ship skins and pants.
Ah the old "Eve is no longer a virgin so we may as well put her out on the street turning tricks to meth addicts for every last dime" argument. We hear this one a lot from NeX quislings. So I counter with.
Since you can access player industry content with Plex/ISK coverted currency if YOU please. Why do you need NeX as well?
Quote:Being the OP, I know perfectly well that I won't pay real money for vanity items. Or even 'real' items. I haven't bought a PLEX for cash, and are not planning too. Will I skin a Hurricane for PVP? Probably not. Will I skin a Dominix for PVE? Probably. Try again. Or don't. You may embarrass yourself. Clearly, you're not the player who 'gets' EVE. EVE is the vision of CCP, not YOU. EVE is what CCP make it. If CCP decide that EVE is to have a NeX store, then EVE has a NeX store. I accept whatever damn thing CCP will do with the game, because they aren't screwing things up for me.
Right so you are the kind of player or didn't protest last summer at the 18 months of abandonment and NeXCarna focus over proper space content right. You are happy being spoon fed whatever the company decides and you don't think customers have a right to provide feedback and direction to a product they support with their subscriptions.
At least we know now what kind of quisling you are.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 12:05:00 -
[125] - Quote
Rellik B00n wrote:Ranger 1 wrote: Pretty much right there with ya. Just don't forget, you need not spend a dime of real cash on a NeX item.
And yet in the end CCP are paid in cash for the item, making it a $ purchase outside the sub. Im not arguing for or against the vanity stuff here Im simply stating a fact: it doesnt matter how many times someone says "but you dont have to pay RL monies for it!" As you effectively ARE spending RL money on it, just not necessarily yours! To put it another way if all stocks of PLEX dried up and no one seeded anymore to market, how would you pay for your vanity item? Not to mention the stupidity of a link between how players pay for their accounts and how players would choose to pay for a popular vanity item. edit: see post 43(?) for more It amazes me how many people don't understand this. Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
268
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 12:09:00 -
[126] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Words You're missing my entire point!
You're not really complaining that something is ruining EVE. You're complaining that something EXTRA isn't being done to EVE. I would love ship skins to be player-created, but they don't need to be right now. They aren't player-created. They can't be reprocessed into minerals. They're based off a system entirely driven by RL forces outside of EVE's sandbox (PLEX).
NeX doesn't help EVE's authenticity, but it doesn't hurt it either.
Ship skins in NeX store? No harm done. No need to complain. Ship skins created by players? Sure, later, to make EVE more 'authentic'. Remember: later. Players want ship skins ASAP.
Iteration. Take customs offices for example. CCP will make PI more player-driven by making customs offices player-operated. Then by adding DUST 514. Customs offices were completely outside of the sandbox, and still are. They're just there. Who put them there? Why didn't players do it? The sandbox is ruined!
Did you complain? No, it probably didn't occur to you.
NeX harms EVE less than PLEX does. See things in perspective.
Thank you. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1297
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 12:29:00 -
[127] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Ship skins in NeX store? No harm done. No need to complain. Ship skilns in the NeX store robs the game of a possible new industry and manufacturing chain. Harm done.
Quote:NeX harms EVE less than PLEX does. How do PLEX harm EVE?
GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
775
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 12:29:00 -
[128] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Words You're missing my entire point! You're not really complaining that something is ruining EVE. You're complaining that something EXTRA isn't being done to EVE. I would love ship skins to be player-created, but they don't need to be right now. They aren't player-created. They can't be reprocessed into minerals. They're based off a system entirely driven by RL forces outside of EVE's sandbox (PLEX).
Its a defeatest attitude. If the Eve community strongly communicate the desire to have player manufactured ship skins we'll get player manufactured ship skins just as we got a near complete 180 degree turn on the virtual abadonment of core eve gameplay this autumn. This is not a time for "suck it up" this is a time for us to let CCP know in the strongest possible terms that they need to work with the subscription and PLEX model they have and preserve the integrity of the player-led sandbox in eve online.
Quote:NeX doesn't help EVE's authenticity, but it doesn't hurt it either.
It definitely hurts it for the reasons I and many others have explained to you in posts above.
Quote:Ship skins in NeX store? No harm done. No need to complain.
The harm done is manifest in the erosion of the sandbox. Just as NeX clothes were the death knell of Incarna then NeX ships will do great harm to the notion of player customization of possessions in space.
Quote:Ship skins created by players? Sure, later, to make EVE more 'authentic'. Remember: later. Players want ship skins ASAP.
If you put these things into NeX there will never be a later. Because NeX is the dirty cheap lowtech lazy way of delivery.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
240
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 12:30:00 -
[129] - Quote
OP LOVES his sparkleponies!
I'll follow Alyssa Yotosala's example:
[ ] - U mad? [ ] - Can I haz your stuffz? [ ] - Troll, x/10 [ ] - Who would _____ someone with a name like _____ [x] - WOW is that way ====> [ ] - Haters gonna hate[/quote]
Skins should be earned like faction ships should be earned, then resold for ISK which will drive the ECONOMY - STUPID - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
775
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 12:32:00 -
[130] - Quote
Tippia wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Ship skins in NeX store? No harm done. No need to complain. Ship skilns in the NeX store robs the game of a possible new industry and manufacturing chain. Harm done. Quote:NeX harms EVE less than PLEX does. How do PLEX harm EVE?
He is going on the PLEX = Eve losing its virginity so lets ***** her out for nickel and dime handjobs out on skid row through the NeX store argument.
But not realizing that PLEX is a pretty complicated concept that does actually help Eve quite a lot by giving players in cash poor or currency challenged countries(situations) the ability to play the game by selling their labour to others.
Of course to NeX quislings its an easy argument to make that surendering a bit of your principle by stomaching PLEX sales means you should surrender all of it to a cash shop eve stripped of any player industrial element in the division of content.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
|

Andreus Ixiris
Mixed Metaphor
217
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 12:54:00 -
[131] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Words You're missing my entire point!.
Yeah, he's very good at that. Andreus Anthony LeHane Ixiris CEO, Mixed Metaphor
Animated Corporate Logos |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
270
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 12:57:00 -
[132] - Quote
Tippia wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Ship skins in NeX store? No harm done. No need to complain. Ship skilns in the NeX store robs the game of a possible new industry and manufacturing chain. Harm done. It robs EVE of something which isn't there...?  CCP can shove skins into the NeX store, and then add player creation of skins through LP or whatever later.
Quote:Quote:NeX harms EVE less than PLEX does. How do PLEX harm EVE? Apparently it hurts the 'authenticity' of EVE by allowing outside forces to manipulate the distribution of power and ISK in the economy. I don't care, though. PLEX helps CCP. PLEX helps poor players. PLEX harms something incorporeal, an unattainable and completely self-contained sandbox.
I tried to be reasonable, but some of you are too stubborn. A last try for now, hmm?
'Sandbox erosion' will not occur because of NeX ship skins. NeX ship skins are outside of the sandbox. Just like customs offices were. They can be added later. PLEX affect the sandbox more than NeX does. Go complain about PLEX instead.
Ciar, I dislike sparkleponies. I like ship skins. Do you like ship skins?
Also, Jade, you win the award of overuse of the word 'quisling'. You even manage to use it incorrectly. Oops.
'A traitor who collaborates with an enemy force occupying their country.' So, the enemy is CCP? The country is EVE? How dare CCP invade EVE!
And, no. The 'enemy' is not NeX. The NeX store is a country besides EVE, whom we occasionally trade with. |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 12:59:00 -
[133] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Azahni Vah'nos wrote: Where is this enrichment of the game you speak of, because all I see is the watering down of content and features to enable microtransactions.
Watering down of content? No. More content is being added. Watering down of features? No. Addition of features. Clearly, you see wrong. You can even access these 'microtransactions' by buying a PLEX with ISK, if you desire. Seems your standards with what you regard as content and features are extremely low.
So remind me again why we need Aurum if they can be bought with PLEX/ISK? I really don't care if I could get them for free, the whole microtransaction process circumvents the player run economy and manufacturing processes. This may come as a shock to you, but I actually care about the future of EVE.
Quote:And what's wrong with microtransactions for vanity, if they can be purchased with a supply/demand affected in-game currency? EVE is already rampant with the effects of out of game forces. The 'sandbox' is already gone. Just look at PLEX. You can literally pay to win. Are you complaining about PLEX? Of course not. You're complaining about ship skins and pants.
Even your signature is totally against the NeX store. When was that all the rage, like 3 months ago? Obviously, you're butthurt. We get it. No need to rub your butthurt in our faces. Because it makes those items worthless as an additional avenue of gamplay in EVE. In a sandbox game they should have added something more than a one off meaningless purchase that doesn't involve any of the in-game mechanics or other players.
No I see PLEX as borderline with my thoughts on it's inclusion in the game. On a positive note It allows players to remain in the game but it does not circumvent the economy or the players who produce items to sell on the market. A couple of the downsides is it becomes an attractive method for bots to remain in the game and encourages people to farm even more ISK, both of which don't help the in-game economy.
Rub my butt in your face? ... sorry, but that will have to remain a mere fantasy of yours. Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1297
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 13:02:00 -
[134] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:It robs EVE of something which isn't there...?  If it is added, then it is there. If it is there and not in the form of standard industry, then the game has indeed been robbed of a new industry and manufacturing chain.
Quote:CCP can shove skins into the NeX store, and then add player creation of skins through LP or whatever later. GǪor just not add them in the NeX store to begin with, since there are far better ways of adding the same content.
Quote:Apparently it hurts the 'authenticity' of EVE by allowing outside forces to manipulate the distribution of power and ISK in the economy. I would like to hear how that is supposed to happenGǪ
Quote:NeX ship skins are outside of the sandbox. Just like customs offices were. Custom offices were not outside the sandbox GÇö they were the same old ISK sink, now injected in the middle of a manufacturing chain, rather than at the beginning of one.
Quote:PLEX affect the sandbox more than NeX does. Go complain about PLEX instead. As soon as someone explains how they affect the sandboxGǪ GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Roime
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 13:18:00 -
[135] - Quote
Ship customization is something I've wanted since my first day in space, and will spend ludicrous amount of any relevant currency if/when it's finally possible.
|

Lexmana
Imperial Stout
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 13:50:00 -
[136] - Quote
This will make highsec ganking even mor lulz than today. Expect increased number of carebear tears and demands for more safety in highsec to protect those NeX/AUR-skins. We are on the slippery slope. |

Rellik B00n
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
15
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 13:51:00 -
[137] - Quote
Roime wrote:Ship customization is something I've wanted since my first day in space, and will spend ludicrous amount of any relevant currency if/when it's finally possible.
"hey lads people are offering totally reasonable arguments as to why NEX for skins is a bad idea, please come post in my thread to help me out" |

Tristan North
The Scope
41
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 13:53:00 -
[138] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Tristan North wrote:What about nebulae sold by nex? And new ship models, and engine trails. Vanity stuff, isn't it? No, none of the above are vanity items. Nebulae are part of the environment. New ship models, such as the 4 being introduced next expansion, are core content available as BPO's and sold on the market. Engine trails are a basic game mechanic, finally reintroduced after being enhanced and optimized in what will hopefully avert their former frame rate killing performance.
You're wrong, nebulae could be vanity, just sell them to who's owning a system. New ship models are vanity if you sell it in the nex, engine trails too. What's the difference between having a diffrent skin or having a different ship model with engine trails? It doesn't affect gameplay. I really don't understand why people want the nex, you feel that 15Gé¼ every month is not enough?
|

Lord Ryan
True Xero
94
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 13:54:00 -
[139] - Quote
"Unsubbing my 68 billion alts now!" -á"Nerf it cause I can't fly it". I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Hark Hanam
Elarion Nation
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 15:02:00 -
[140] - Quote
The core of any mmorpg is the economic system : for everything you need to do, you need to cross the economic part of the game. It's obvious.
Mixing that In-game economics with RL economics is dangerous because it change in an unpredictable way the economics.
Saying that plex does not affect the economy of eve is a weak analysis : It indeed CREATE a need for player : the need for PLEX, PLEX are made out of RL money : it does not add isk, it does not add "i win" button stricto sensu, but it does modify a lot of things in the game economic balance : it allow some player to own a valuable item that is needed by others, an item they can create with a creditcard. So, PLEX create a new need : the need of F2P eve. People are not equal RL money wise. The MMO is made of people. Giving people the opportunity to "use" that money lever to gain power / credits over other people in the game DO CHANGE the game, you are no more "an avatar", it is no more "virtual". EVE IS REAL. With poor and rich player, where poor work for rich and where rich do have easiest way to build their "in game" projects. And with a lot of mid-classe who don't give a phrack but won't invest themselves to keep it "that game i play on sunday night".
CCP DID plan to change the buisness model of EVE because they wanted to have a F2P-like which seemed to be "better". Who can blame ? It appears it wasn't. Most of F2P are hidden casinos saying the game is cheaper when it's not. Once the ads effect is done and the scam is over, F2P is no more the "shiny brand new way of doing mmo". The buisness model hits the fan : people who fled the F2P casinos are now saying : put the fan in reverse mode to suck it up. People who have no problem with it asks "why people with more gametime should be more powerful than people with more RL money ?".
A part of the community is extremely hostile to the NEX store. CCP did mistakes with their buisness plan. A part of the community is favorable to the NEX store with limits (and some player may even be favorable to the NEX store without limits but they are docked.)
The choice is NOT ours : if CCP is forced in a way or in another to go the NEX store way, they will, that's it. If they are happy that some people enjoy the nEX store and don't want to hear the others... We can be helpful to them with posts and feedback to guide them to a successful product, saying if we like or dislike something, but it's definitively not our roles to say what should be in the nex store, if it's good or bad for the game, neither it is to put pressure on other player with things like the OPost stating "you are stupid if [insert any opinion]".
And for my feedback I would simply say : If i had to run 10 times more than others in a soccer game to reach my goal because i didn't spent those 20 extra Gé¼, i would clearly play tennis instead. Some people enjoy spending money : who can blame ?
Say the ship skin is my goal in EVE, if i had to farm km / missions 10 times more than others to reach it, i would clearly play soccer instead : because soccer is real just like EVE, because soccer is fun just like EVE, because the goal is to kicks things in team just like EVE and because soccer is cheap just like..wait a minute. |
|

Black Dranzer
55
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 15:05:00 -
[141] - Quote
I won't get mad, but if they cost more than 250 Aurum a pop I'll just laugh.
In before they cost 2500. |

Roime
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 15:11:00 -
[142] - Quote
Rellik B00n wrote:Roime wrote:Ship customization is something I've wanted since my first day in space, and will spend ludicrous amount of any relevant currency if/when it's finally possible.
"hey lads people are offering totally reasonable arguments as to why NEX for skins is a bad idea, please come post in my thread to help me out"
Took me a while to get your point :D never even spoken to the OP, nor do I agree with him 100%, I just came with my 2 cents. Ship skins are cool, I want them.
As they have no effect on game balance in any way, I'd rather pay CCP for vanity pimpin mah space ships than some other player.
|

Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
143
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 15:25:00 -
[143] - Quote
People will not complain unless you can't buy/sell them on the market or if the price is outrageous.
Don't screw this up a second time, CCP. |

Rellik B00n
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
15
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 15:26:00 -
[144] - Quote
Roime wrote:Rellik B00n wrote:Roime wrote:Ship customization is something I've wanted since my first day in space, and will spend ludicrous amount of any relevant currency if/when it's finally possible.
"hey lads people are offering totally reasonable arguments as to why NEX for skins is a bad idea, please come post in my thread to help me out" Took me a while to get your point :D never even spoken to the OP, nor do I agree with him 100%, I just came with my 2 cents. Ship skins are cool, I want them. As they have no effect on game balance in any way, I'd rather pay CCP for vanity pimpin mah space ships than some other player.
but... but.. but.. thats so bloody reasonable of you dammit, cant you call me a noob or somet just to make me feel like this is the EvE online forums?  |

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
50
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 15:41:00 -
[145] - Quote
I have to admit that I haven't read the enitre thread.
My view is that selling 'vanity' crap for converted Plexes isn't going to kill this game.
Want a pink Raven, fine, pony up ...
Don't want to waste RL money or Plexes on Pink Ravens, well just don't.
If they would start to sell game changing stuff for Aur, then I'll get pissed, and most likely quit.
But as long as it's vanity stuff, I'll keep playing, giggling at people with more isk than brains, and possibly joining them if I happen to have too much isk and too much beer at the same time.
|

Sinistra Arc
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 16:54:00 -
[146] - Quote
T-Jay Charante wrote:Montevius Williams wrote:Ship skin = Vanity. I have no issue at all with it being on the Nex market. If your ship is destroyed however, you need to buy a new skin. Thats my view. The Spaceship Barbies will rage, if that's the case.
You know it will be and therefore the fancy will wear off real quick. Or,
people will skin the ships they only keep in station.
Fancy that. |

Solhild
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
54
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 17:06:00 -
[147] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Solhild wrote:NeX allows content for Aurum, thus ISK.Content is immersion and enhances player experiences I've always been uncomfortable with the vanity only argument as it means you only get the full content experience if you pay more and more Aurum, thus ISK.If we were building the game without this consideration, ship skins/logos, etc. would probably be earned from LP, be awarded for completing missions, running a corp, or having great standings - NeX means all of those options and game depth are replaced by Aurum, thus ISK. FYP. Don't pay a cent if you don't want to. Thank you, you saved me the trouble. 
Don't worry, you've repeated your view enough times and I get it - I just don't see that NeX, or the way the store works is as harmless as you do. I don't even think it fits EVE.
Sadly. |

T'Laar Bok
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 17:10:00 -
[148] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Ships skins may be coming this winter.
Are people really zoomed in far enough the actually see their ship or anyone elses in space? Ship skins seems like something else that only you can see in station.
Amphetimines are your friend. |

Trainwreck McGee
Ghost Ship Inc.
111
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 17:16:00 -
[149] - Quote
stopped at your awful quote. I pay 15 dollars a month already as a customer i have the right to get mad when a company tries to scam me out of more money. At least give us like 10 skins to choose from and put premium ones in the Nex store. But you know Hellmar will put them on the market for like 15k Aurum or something.
CCP Trainwreck - Weekend Custodial Engineer / CCP Necrogoats foot stool |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
233
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 17:18:00 -
[150] - Quote
Rellik B00n wrote:Ranger 1 wrote: Pretty much right there with ya. Just don't forget, you need not spend a dime of real cash on a NeX item.
And yet in the end CCP are paid in cash for the item, making it a $ purchase outside the sub. Im not arguing for or against the vanity stuff here Im simply stating a fact: it doesnt matter how many times someone says "but you dont have to pay RL monies for it!" As you effectively ARE spending RL money on it, just not necessarily yours! To put it another way if all stocks of PLEX dried up and no one seeded anymore to market, how would you pay for your vanity item? Not to mention the stupidity of a link between how players pay for their accounts and how players would choose to pay for a popular vanity item. edit: see post 43(?) for more
Exactly correct. Give this man a cigar.
CCP is paid in cash, just not by the person wanting the vanity item. More income for CCP that doesn't involve a subscription increase is GOOD!.
CCP is paid by the person that buys the PLEX with cash, because they wish to sell it for in game currency.
The person that buys the PLEX with cash gets exactly what they want for their money. They get ISK.
The person that buys the vanity item with and ISK purchased PLEX gets exactly what they want. The vanity item in question without spending their own cash to aquire it.
CCP gets exactly what they want. The get the income from the original PLEX purchase..
Not seeing a problem here.
As to what happens if people stop buying PLEX... seriously?
PLEX supplies drop, cost of PLEX raises sharply, PLEX becomes much more profitable, people buy more PLEX.
Pretty basic economy 101. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |
|

Lexmana
Imperial Stout
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 17:26:00 -
[151] - Quote
I won't be mad but others will. Please add a tip of the day to all n00bs: Don't fly a skin you can't afford to lose and if you lose it don't rage on forums afterwards demanding increased security to highsec to protect your bling. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
763
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 17:36:00 -
[152] - Quote
Tippia wrote:or just not add them in the NeX store to begin with, since there are far better ways of adding the same content. The OP has convinced himself that if CCP goes through the trouble of creating a ship-skinning system that the *only* way it could ever be added to the game is through the NeX. Apparently adding them to the LP store or just having a dropdown menu in the ship fitting window to select the skin you want isn't technically possible.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Jacob cirth
Ion Corp. Citex Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 17:41:00 -
[153] - Quote
Some arguments may be "reasonable", but the most reasonable thing to do of all would be to introduce ship skins outside of the NeX store. BPOs, drop down menus, and other normal ways to implement basic features. |

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
50
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 17:45:00 -
[154] - Quote
T'Laar Bok wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Ships skins may be coming this winter. Are people really zoomed in far enough the actually see their ship or anyone elses in space? Ship skins seems like something else that only you can see in station. Indeed.
And why would anyone bother if me Raven was pink or not, unless they wanted to check?
So if I want to spend a plex or five on painting me Raven pink, that people might or might not notice before it's blown up.
What's the problem?
Using Aur/Plex to paint your ship says that your either completely daft, or much better than you.
Either way, it says comr and kill me.
So what's the bad with that?
|

Richard Aiel
Point of No Return Waterboard
32
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 18:13:00 -
[155] - Quote
Solhild wrote:NeX is a bad idea - pure and simple. Subscription is for content Subscription means active players generating and destroying isk Subscription allows some players to sell isk/time from other players with PLEX PLEX supplements income for CCP NeX only allows content for cash Content is immersion and enhances player experiences I've always been uncomfortable with the vanity only argument as it means you only get the full content experience if you pay more and more cash. If we were building the game without this consideration, ship skins/logos, etc. would probably be earned from LP, be awarded for completing missions, running a corp, or having great standings - NeX means all of those options and game depth are replaced by cash 
Yes, Ive watched that downward slide, personally, on the STO forums. It was "vanity only" at first, then they started introducing races you didnt have access to in game, then ships that had special abilities, then special xp enhancers etc etc etc. "If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave." Quoth the Hillmar |

Digital Messiah
The Scope Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 18:15:00 -
[156] - Quote
When you can use a custom skin, that has your alliance / corp logo on the side of it and hot babes. That is when I will buy new skins. Or whenever I get tired of staring at rust. "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn" |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
765
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 18:15:00 -
[157] - Quote
Richard Aiel wrote:Yes, Ive watched that downward slide, personally, on the STO forums. It was "vanity only" at first, then they started introducing races you didnt have access to in game, then ships that had special abilities, then special xp enhancers etc etc etc. It happens in every game with a microtransaction store. As soon as the developers/publishers realize that there are people out there willing to pay a bunch of rl money to win a computer game they become more than happy to accommodate.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
233
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 18:16:00 -
[158] - Quote
Solhild wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Solhild wrote:NeX allows content for Aurum, thus ISK.Content is immersion and enhances player experiences I've always been uncomfortable with the vanity only argument as it means you only get the full content experience if you pay more and more Aurum, thus ISK.If we were building the game without this consideration, ship skins/logos, etc. would probably be earned from LP, be awarded for completing missions, running a corp, or having great standings - NeX means all of those options an  d game depth are replaced by Aurum, thus ISK. FYP. Don't pay a cent if you don't want to. Thank you, you saved me the trouble.  Don't worry, you've repeated your view enough times and I get it - I just don't see that NeX, or the way the store works is as harmless as you do. I don't even think it fits EVE. Sadly.
My appologies, in retrospect my reply sounded nastier than it was intended.
Jacob cirth wrote:Some arguments may be "reasonable", but the most reasonable thing to do of all would be to introduce ship skins outside of the NeX store. BPOs, drop down menus, and other normal ways to implement basic features.
And this is where the arguments against the NeX fall short, including (respectfully) Jade's.
A few facts, read closely:
The Nex store is an intergal link between DUST industry and economy and EVE industry and economy. It is not going away. In fact, it is inevitable that it will expand.
Remember carefully why the Ishukone Scorpion was not offered through the NeX.
Players pointed out that it circumvented the player driven industrial base too much.
CCP replied "We know, this is just a test of the system as it is until we can properly implement either BPC transactions via the NeX or accept tangibles like ships, PI goods, whatever player produced items as part of the purchse price. However, since you object to this test we will cancel it until such time as we can implement the full system".
This effectively ends all arguments to based on the NeX store undermining the player based industry in EVE. The only arguable points now are to what degree player industry will be involved, and will clothing items also be converted to this system (and yes, they should be).
We have already covered arguments based on "I shouldn't have to pay more than my subscription for this content", since you in fact do not. You can get your Aurum from ISK purchased PLEX, which helps the guy out thats trying to sell his cash bought PLEX for ISK, which helps out CCP by stimulating their PLEX for cash market.
So what do we have left to argue about?
Not much, other than the continual stream of people who don't understand the concept at all... but are highly upset about it. 
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1300
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 18:27:00 -
[159] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:The OP has convinced himself that if CCP goes through the trouble of creating a ship-skinning system that the *only* way it could ever be added to the game is through the NeX. Apparently adding them to the LP store or just having a dropdown menu in the ship fitting window to select the skin you want isn't technically possible. GǪwhich is particularly hilarious seeing as how the market and LP store already have all the mechanisms in place to deal with it (and, in fact, already does), whereas the NeX very famously was (and still is, half a year later) utterly unable to do exactly that. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
234
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 18:47:00 -
[160] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:The OP has convinced himself that if CCP goes through the trouble of creating a ship-skinning system that the *only* way it could ever be added to the game is through the NeX. Apparently adding them to the LP store or just having a dropdown menu in the ship fitting window to select the skin you want isn't technically possible. GǪwhich is particularly hilarious seeing as how the market and LP store already have all the mechanisms in place to deal with it (and, in fact, already does), whereas the NeX very famously was (and still is, half a year later) utterly unable to do exactly that.
Agreed, at least as far as the loyalty point store is concerned.
Of course, we don't know exactly what the differences are in the underlying code. Usually it's the small details that end up making something that you would think would be simple end up being stupidly complicated to actually do.
. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |
|

Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 18:53:00 -
[161] - Quote
As long as the skins are reasonably priced, and have a decent variety for selection, then I'm all for it.
And I'd so totally pay AUR to fly this, too
E: Typing-fail. I A/F/K cloak in Jita. Does that count? |

Solhild
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
55
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 18:59:00 -
[162] - Quote
This thread is beginning to impress me. Are we still in GD? |

Richard Aiel
Point of No Return Waterboard
32
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 19:48:00 -
[163] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Richard Aiel wrote:Yes, Ive watched that downward slide, personally, on the STO forums. It was "vanity only" at first, then they started introducing races you didnt have access to in game, then ships that had special abilities, then special xp enhancers etc etc etc. It happens in every game with a microtransaction store. As soon as the developers/publishers realize that there are people out there willing to pay a bunch of rl money to win a computer game they become more than happy to accommodate.
you ask why we have an issue with NeX?
"If you fail to learn from the past you are doomed to repeat it" "If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave." Quoth the Hillmar |

Jacob cirth
Ion Corp. Citex Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:08:00 -
[164] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:Some arguments may be "reasonable", but the most reasonable thing to do of all would be to introduce ship skins outside of the NeX store. BPOs, drop down menus, and other normal ways to implement basic features. And this is where the arguments against the NeX fall short, including (respectfully) Jade's. A few facts, read closely:  The Nex store is an intergal link between DUST industry and economy and EVE industry and economy. It is not going away. In fact, it is inevitable that it will expand.  Remember carefully why the Ishukone Scorpion was not offered through the NeX. Players pointed out that it circumvented the player driven industrial base too much. CCP replied "We know, this is just a test of the system as it is until we can properly implement either BPC transactions via the NeX or accept tangibles like ships, PI goods, whatever player produced items as part of the purchse price. However, since you object to this test we will cancel it until such time as we can implement the full system". This effectively ends all arguments based on the NeX store undermining the player based industry in EVE. The only arguable points now are to what degree player industry will be involved, and will clothing items also be converted to this system (and yes, they should be). We have already covered arguments based on "I shouldn't have to pay more than my subscription for this content", since you in fact do not. You can get your Aurum from ISK purchased PLEX, which helps the guy out thats trying to sell his cash bought PLEX for ISK, which helps out CCP by stimulating their PLEX for cash market. So what do we have left to argue about? Not much, other than the continual stream of people who don't understand the concept at all... but are highly upset about it. 
Too much assumption in your response, too much of this is a bad idea, and none of it refutes NeX being a bad idea. Double charging us for content is never ok.
|

Xorth Adimus
Blackwater USA Inc. Against ALL Authorities
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:10:00 -
[165] - Quote
Ship + Aur = Vanity ship to kill and make someone lose (cry) more over = win for CCP = win for pilots
There is no rage here.. |

Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:12:00 -
[166] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Ships skins may be coming this winter, if the recent hints are anything to go by. The possibility that they'll be sold on the NeX store is very high. . they said on the 2nd video that they had finished HALF the ships on the new render needed to apply ships skins. and i don't see them finishing the other half in a few days. so no, they won't come for winter. maybe next epansion however. and yeah good chance it will be on new store... for bad or good. |

Skorpynekomimi
E.A.D Alliance Omega Vector
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:15:00 -
[167] - Quote
**** vanity. If I can have shark jaws on all the hurricane hulls I want forever, then I'll happily scrape and save for it. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
234
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:22:00 -
[168] - Quote
Quote:Too much assumption in your response, too much of this is a bad idea, and none of it refutes NeX being a bad idea. Double charging us for content is never ok.
None of this is an assumption. Verify it yourself by watching the interviews during the last alliance tournament, Dev Blogs concerning the Ishukone Watch Scorpion, and the information released about the DUST economy and it's relationship with EVE.
None of this is a bad idea. It's just a different way to do what we already do, simply in a different interface that will also work with DUST.
All if it refutes the idea that the NeX is a bad idea.
That would be true, if you were being double charged. However since this is new content that you can (and most will) buy with ISK, just as you do with the new ships being introduced to the game, you are not being double charged. You simply have to option to pay for these items with cash... exactly as you have that option now... via a more direct interface.
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Jacob cirth
Ion Corp. Citex Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:27:00 -
[169] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Quote:Too much assumption in your response, too much of this is a bad idea, and none of it refutes NeX being a bad idea. Double charging us for content is never ok.
None of this is an assumption. Verify it yourself by watching the interviews during the last alliance tournament, Dev Blogs concerning the Ishukone Watch Scorpion, and the information released about the DUST economy and it's relationship with EVE. None of this is a bad idea. It's just a different way to do what we already do, simply in a different interface that will also work with DUST. All if it refutes the idea that the NeX is a bad idea. That would be true, if you were being double charged. However since this is new content that you can (and most will) buy with ISK, just as you do with the new ships being introduced to the game, you are not being double charged. You simply have to option to pay for these items with cash... exactly as you have that option now... via a more direct interface. You're not very bright are you? NeX = aurum = plex = $$. Regardless of whether or not I pay ISK for it is irrelevant due to the fact it took real money to generate.
I already pay $15/month, why should I pay more? Time to face the fact that this is a failed experiment, and it deserved to fail. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
234
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:32:00 -
[170] - Quote
Jacob cirth wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Quote:Too much assumption in your response, too much of this is a bad idea, and none of it refutes NeX being a bad idea. Double charging us for content is never ok.
None of this is an assumption. Verify it yourself by watching the interviews during the last alliance tournament, Dev Blogs concerning the Ishukone Watch Scorpion, and the information released about the DUST economy and it's relationship with EVE. None of this is a bad idea. It's just a different way to do what we already do, simply in a different interface that will also work with DUST. All if it refutes the idea that the NeX is a bad idea. That would be true, if you were being double charged. However since this is new content that you can (and most will) buy with ISK, just as you do with the new ships being introduced to the game, you are not being double charged. You simply have to option to pay for these items with cash... exactly as you have that option now... via a more direct interface. You're not very bright are you? NeX = aurum = plex = $$. Regardless of whether or not I pay ISK for it is irrelevant due to the fact it took real money to generate. I already pay $15/month, why should I pay more? Time to face the fact that this is a failed experiment, and it deserved to fail.
You don't pay the cash. The person that purchased the PLEX did. You are simply giving that person what he wants, namely your ISK.
To put it in your terms:
NeX = aurum = plex = ISK.
It's time to face the fact that NeX items will not cost you a penny over your subscription unless you wish them to, assuming you want to purchase those items off of the NeX at all. You could also simply wait until the item becomes available on the main market or the contract system. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |
|

Richard Aiel
Point of No Return Waterboard
32
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:36:00 -
[171] - Quote
Ranger would be correct if we werent paying a sub, methinks the NeX store was the first salvo towards making the game free to play, as as Hilmar has hinted at, the sub payment plan isnt feasible in the long run. "If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave." Quoth the Hillmar |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
234
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:37:00 -
[172] - Quote
Let me quote myself in case you don't get the whole PLEX cycle.
Quote: The person that buys the PLEX with cash gets exactly what they want for their money. They get ISK.  The person that buys the vanity item with and ISK purchased PLEX gets exactly what they want. The vanity item in question without spending their own cash to aquire it.  CCP gets exactly what they want. The get the income from the original PLEX purchase.. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Jacob cirth
Ion Corp. Citex Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:38:00 -
[173] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Quote:Too much assumption in your response, too much of this is a bad idea, and none of it refutes NeX being a bad idea. Double charging us for content is never ok.
None of this is an assumption. Verify it yourself by watching the interviews during the last alliance tournament, Dev Blogs concerning the Ishukone Watch Scorpion, and the information released about the DUST economy and it's relationship with EVE. None of this is a bad idea. It's just a different way to do what we already do, simply in a different interface that will also work with DUST. All if it refutes the idea that the NeX is a bad idea. That would be true, if you were being double charged. However since this is new content that you can (and most will) buy with ISK, just as you do with the new ships being introduced to the game, you are not being double charged. You simply have to option to pay for these items with cash... exactly as you have that option now... via a more direct interface. You're not very bright are you? NeX = aurum = plex = $$. Regardless of whether or not I pay ISK for it is irrelevant due to the fact it took real money to generate. I already pay $15/month, why should I pay more? Time to face the fact that this is a failed experiment, and it deserved to fail. You don't pay the cash. The person that purchased the PLEX did. You are simply giving that person what he wants, namely your ISK. To put it in your terms: NeX = aurum = plex = ISK. It's time to face the fact that NeX items will not cost you a penny over your subscription unless you wish them to, assuming you want to purchase those items off of the NeX at all. You could also simply wait until the item becomes available on the main market or the contract system.
I could, but why should I? How is it better than the traditional way of releasing content to us?
Simple answer, it's not, and no amount of logical gymnastics on your part will fix it.
|

Hallorin
State War Academy Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:39:00 -
[174] - Quote
Jacob cirth wrote:
I already pay $15/month, why should I pay more? Time to face the fact that this is a failed experiment, and it deserved to fail.
This is more of the same Aur/Nex is AUTOMATICALLY bad crap that gets bandied about here too much.
Now don't misunderstand me here. I am not arguing that NeX is great or that CCP will make good on what I am about to suggest but I'll try to prove that Aur/NeX is not automatically bad and that it doesn't NECESSARILY amount to double charging.
Image, just for example, if some outside company or a modder created an add-on for EVE that contained, I don't know, some vanity items. Imagine CCP wasn't making these but a lot of players wanted them and they did not affect gameplay except in some vanity way.
Now imagine CCP said, sure we don't care, it's ok, not against the EULA - go ahead.
If outside company or modder charged for this service, nobody would say CCP was double charging them - because it would be money going to someone else entirely.
Now imagine if instead, CCP, who was busy pumping out new ships, engine trails, shots that miss, hybrid balancing, UI upgrades, Beautiful backrounds, etc said:
"Hey, why don't we create a new department that we can't really afford to pay, and they can create content that players like but these guys will sell it via MT. They will exist solely to provide the content that the players can pay for and support that department by buying"
In other words, Just like the outside modder, No MT = No ability to provide that content. CCP is busy providing the all the content that subs can pay for but this new department functions just like the outside modder. It generates content based on the ADDITIONAL influx of money.
So CCP isn't double charging in such a case -- not if they are busy providing all the actual content that subs can buy, which, it appears they are doing right now.
If it was otherwise, CCP would not have just laid a bunch of people off.
I swear some of you would be happier if CCP just said "You are right, We can't afford to make ship skins without MT so no ship skins for you."
Edit: I feel I should reiterate. I'm not saying this IS what's happening. I don't know. Maybe CCP could just give us all of this. But it COULD be happening, and it most definitely could happen more in the future.
I mean seriously, DUST is in some distant way a 'part' of eve. should they just give that away too so they don't 'double-charge' you? |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
238
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:45:00 -
[175] - Quote
Jacob cirth wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Quote:Too much assumption in your response, too much of this is a bad idea, and none of it refutes NeX being a bad idea. Double charging us for content is never ok.
None of this is an assumption. Verify it yourself by watching the interviews during the last alliance tournament, Dev Blogs concerning the Ishukone Watch Scorpion, and the information released about the DUST economy and it's relationship with EVE. None of this is a bad idea. It's just a different way to do what we already do, simply in a different interface that will also work with DUST. All if it refutes the idea that the NeX is a bad idea. That would be true, if you were being double charged. However since this is new content that you can (and most will) buy with ISK, just as you do with the new ships being introduced to the game, you are not being double charged. You simply have to option to pay for these items with cash... exactly as you have that option now... via a more direct interface. You're not very bright are you? NeX = aurum = plex = $$. Regardless of whether or not I pay ISK for it is irrelevant due to the fact it took real money to generate. I already pay $15/month, why should I pay more? Time to face the fact that this is a failed experiment, and it deserved to fail. You don't pay the cash. The person that purchased the PLEX did. You are simply giving that person what he wants, namely your ISK. To put it in your terms: NeX = aurum = plex = ISK. It's time to face the fact that NeX items will not cost you a penny over your subscription unless you wish them to, assuming you want to purchase those items off of the NeX at all. You could also simply wait until the item becomes available on the main market or the contract system. I could, but why should I? How is it better than the traditional way of releasing content to us? Simple answer, it's not, and no amount of logical gymnastics on your part will fix it.
So you won't be buying the new BC''s or their BPO's with ISK?
Nifty, I didn't realise that my subscription entitles me to having everything in the game without paying ISK for it. 
Edit: Sorry, it's after the fact by a few minutes.
It requires no logical gymnastics to understand that any content in the game that you can own is purchased either with ISK or with Cash currently. This is not changing, only the interface is... so that it can also form a common interface with DUST. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
76
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:04:00 -
[176] - Quote
Richard Aiel wrote:Ranger would be correct if we werent paying a sub, methinks the NeX store was the first salvo towards making the game free to play, as as Hilmar has hinted at, the sub payment plan isnt feasible in the long run.
This. Didnt Hilmar make referrence to this payment model not working over time? (This payment model being the $15 a moth one)
They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

Jacob cirth
Ion Corp. Citex Alliance
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:06:00 -
[177] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:So you won't be buying the new BC''s or their BPO's with ISK? Nifty, I didn't realise that my subscription entitles me to having everything in the game without paying ISK for it.  It's ok, not everyone was blessed with good genes for reading comprehension and common sense. Ask a parent, guardian, or teacher to break it down for you.
Here's a hint: You dont need extra real life money to create a Tier 3 BC. You do with any NeX item.
Ranger 1 wrote: It requires no logical gymnastics to understand
Followed by..
Ranger 1 wrote:logical gymnastics
There is literally zero good reason that I, as a customer already paying for an account, should accept content in the NeX store. |

Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
47
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:07:00 -
[178] - Quote
My Little Pony ship skins would add to the dark atmosphere in the game. Knock it up a few notches to "deeply demented" even. |

Jacob cirth
Ion Corp. Citex Alliance
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:08:00 -
[179] - Quote
Hallorin wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
I already pay $15/month, why should I pay more? Time to face the fact that this is a failed experiment, and it deserved to fail.
This is more of the same Aur/Nex is AUTOMATICALLY bad crap that gets bandied about here too much. Now don't misunderstand me here. I am not arguing that NeX is great or that CCP will make good on what I am about to suggest but I'll try to prove that Aur/NeX is not automatically bad and that it doesn't NECESSARILY amount to double charging. Image, just for example, if some outside company or a modder created an add-on for EVE that contained, I don't know, some vanity items. Imagine CCP wasn't making these but a lot of players wanted them and they did not affect gameplay except in some vanity way. Now imagine CCP said, sure we don't care, it's ok, not against the EULA - go ahead. If outside company or modder charged for this service, nobody would say CCP was double charging them - because it would be money going to someone else entirely. Now imagine if instead, CCP, who was busy pumping out new ships, engine trails, shots that miss, hybrid balancing, UI upgrades, Beautiful backrounds, etc said: "Hey, why don't we create a new department that we can't really afford to pay, and they can create content that players like but these guys will sell it via MT. They will exist solely to provide the content that the players can pay for and support that department by buying" In other words, Just like the outside modder, No MT = No ability to provide that content. CCP is busy providing the all the content that subs can pay for but this new department functions just like the outside modder. It generates content based on the ADDITIONAL influx of money. So CCP isn't double charging in such a case -- not if they are busy providing all the actual content that subs can buy, which, it appears they are doing right now. If it was otherwise, CCP would not have just laid a bunch of people off. I swear some of you would be happier if CCP just said "You are right, We can't afford to make ship skins without MT so no ship skins for you." Edit: I feel I should reiterate. I'm not saying this IS what's happening. I don't know. Maybe CCP could just give us all of this. But it COULD be happening, and it most definitely could happen more in the future. I mean seriously, DUST is in some distant way a 'part' of eve. should they just give that away too so they don't 'double-charge' you? Correct, they shouldn't charge us twice for content we've already paid for. I don't care if it's some sub department "they can't really pay for". That's their poor business decision, but in no way entitles them to double charge me. End of story. |

Jacob cirth
Ion Corp. Citex Alliance
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:09:00 -
[180] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:Richard Aiel wrote:Ranger would be correct if we werent paying a sub, methinks the NeX store was the first salvo towards making the game free to play, as as Hilmar has hinted at, the sub payment plan isnt feasible in the long run. This. Didnt Hilmar make referrence to this payment model not working over time? (This payment model being the $15 a moth one)
Because Hilmar hasn't been wrong before |
|

Tristan North
The Scope
41
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:12:00 -
[181] - Quote
Jacob cirth wrote:
How is it better than the traditional way of releasing content to us?
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
238
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:14:00 -
[182] - Quote
Quote:Here's a hint: You dont need extra real life money to create a Tier 3 BC. You do with any NeX item.
I pay for all NeX items with ISK, as can you. I will pay for Tier 3 BC with ISK, as will you.
If I don't have the ISK for either one I can pay cash instead, as can you.
I am not being forced to pay double if I wish to aquire either one unless I wish to.
Sorry you are having difficulty understanding this fundamental point, but there it is. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
238
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:14:00 -
[183] - Quote
Tristan North wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
How is it better than the traditional way of releasing content to us?
Because it allows a common marketing system with DUST. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Tristan North
The Scope
41
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:17:00 -
[184] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Tristan North wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
How is it better than the traditional way of releasing content to us?
Because it allows a common marketing system with DUST. LOL |

Jacob cirth
Ion Corp. Citex Alliance
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:17:00 -
[185] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Tristan North wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
How is it better than the traditional way of releasing content to us?
Because it allows a common marketing system with DUST. Yes, but how is it BETTER? It's not. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
238
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:24:00 -
[186] - Quote
Jacob cirth wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Tristan North wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
How is it better than the traditional way of releasing content to us?
Because it allows a common marketing system with DUST. Yes, but how is it BETTER? It's not.
Not necessarily better, but necessary.
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
785
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:25:00 -
[187] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Tristan North wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
How is it better than the traditional way of releasing content to us?
Because it allows a common marketing system with DUST. What about after Dust fails?
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
238
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:26:00 -
[188] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Tristan North wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
How is it better than the traditional way of releasing content to us?
Because it allows a common marketing system with DUST. What about after Dust fails?
We'll burn that bridge when we come to it.  To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
785
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:30:00 -
[189] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote: What about after Dust fails?
We'll burn that bridge when we come to it.  Start planning now. I doubt it will be around long enough to make arrangements after it launches The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
238
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:34:00 -
[190] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote: What about after Dust fails?
We'll burn that bridge when we come to it.  Start planning now. I doubt it will be around long enough to make arrangements after it launches
You could be right. A lot of innovative idea's never become commercially successful.
I personally hope you are wrong.
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |
|

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
273
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:43:00 -
[191] - Quote
Tristan North wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
How is it better than the traditional way of releasing content to us?
Because CCP don't need to delay ships for the umpteenth time. Again. The NeX store is quick, dirty and safe.
If skins were to be on the LP store, the following questions will need to be asked:
Will there be an extra way to make skins, through player manufacturing? Player designed, or blueprints? What do you need to purchase or manufacture a skin? Will you buy skinned ships, or 'paint cans' which you use on ships? Will skinned ships, or 'paint cans' be on the market? They should, given that it'd be player driven. Where's the one-stop place for players to conveniently browse through available skins? How can the base prices of skins easily be regulated as a whole, from the one store database? Will skinned ships even support the LP store right now, given inventory IDs and whatnot which will be the same as unskinned, or differently skinned counterparts? Which LP store will sell the more 'generic' skins, with no particular faction/corporation theme? When custom corp logos on ships become available, will LP stores inexplicably sell those too? Or will it be on yet another store, leaving the ship customisation interface split? What will be most profitable for CCP? How will the vanity items of ship skins affect the prices of non-vanity items such as CNRs and other LP items? Is this a good thing? If a player wants to skin their Rokh with a Mordus skin, will they need to be required to fly to a Mordus LP store? How many extra LP stores do we need to introduce? Would it be fitting for players to buy pirate skins from faction LP stores? Where does the plot fit? How can skinning a ship be most convenient for a player? Will LP stores and the market need to be updated with a specialised skin-browsing interface, so players can see more than tiny icons and get a preview of the skin quickly and easily? How will the plethora of skins be sorted along with all of the other items? When will the scroll bar get too painful to scroll through? Will be be able to reskin ships? Will this mean that LP stores need every single combination of a skin-exchange listed? Or do all ships need a new identifier value? |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
787
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:45:00 -
[192] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Because CCP don't need to delay ships for the umpteenth time. It is hilarious that you keep saying this. Why would it delay anything to use the LP store or just create a dropdown menu in the ship fitting window with a list of all the skins?
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
273
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:48:00 -
[193] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Because CCP don't need to delay ships for the umpteenth time. Why would it delay anything to use the LP store or just create a dropdown menu in the ship fitting window with a list of all the skins? This the part where you realise that you were somehow incompetent enough to miss 90.2% of the words in my post. Good job. That takes a special kind of person.
|

Hallorin
State War Academy Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:54:00 -
[194] - Quote
Jacob cirth wrote:Hallorin wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
I already pay $15/month, why should I pay more? Time to face the fact that this is a failed experiment, and it deserved to fail.
This is more of the same Aur/Nex is AUTOMATICALLY bad crap that gets bandied about here too much. Now don't misunderstand me here. I am not arguing that NeX is great or that CCP will make good on what I am about to suggest but I'll try to prove that Aur/NeX is not automatically bad and that it doesn't NECESSARILY amount to double charging. Image, just for example, if some outside company or a modder created an add-on for EVE that contained, I don't know, some vanity items. Imagine CCP wasn't making these but a lot of players wanted them and they did not affect gameplay except in some vanity way. Now imagine CCP said, sure we don't care, it's ok, not against the EULA - go ahead. If outside company or modder charged for this service, nobody would say CCP was double charging them - because it would be money going to someone else entirely. Now imagine if instead, CCP, who was busy pumping out new ships, engine trails, shots that miss, hybrid balancing, UI upgrades, Beautiful backrounds, etc said: "Hey, why don't we create a new department that we can't really afford to pay, and they can create content that players like but these guys will sell it via MT. They will exist solely to provide the content that the players can pay for and support that department by buying" In other words, Just like the outside modder, No MT = No ability to provide that content. CCP is busy providing the all the content that subs can pay for but this new department functions just like the outside modder. It generates content based on the ADDITIONAL influx of money. So CCP isn't double charging in such a case -- not if they are busy providing all the actual content that subs can buy, which, it appears they are doing right now. If it was otherwise, CCP would not have just laid a bunch of people off. I swear some of you would be happier if CCP just said "You are right, We can't afford to make ship skins without MT so no ship skins for you." Edit: I feel I should reiterate. I'm not saying this IS what's happening. I don't know. Maybe CCP could just give us all of this. But it COULD be happening, and it most definitely could happen more in the future. I mean seriously, DUST is in some distant way a 'part' of eve. should they just give that away too so they don't 'double-charge' you? Correct, they shouldn't charge us twice for content we've already paid for. I don't care if it's some sub department "they can't really pay for". That's their poor business decision, but in no way entitles them to double charge me. End of story.
End of story huh? Just like that
Did you even read my post? It wouldn't be content you've already paid for!
NeX either now has, or has the potential to have content that you have NOT paid for. Without prospects for MT, many of these things may never have been implemented.
Again, just imagine (and actually do it this time) that eve said:
A lot of people want a hugely expanded selection of clothing in the NeX store, but hey, eve players have spoken, we will dedicate ourselves to FIS and FIS only. NONE of your subscription money will go to development of these items.
But, money that we make on these items WILL go towards creating these items. Money we make in the NeX store will be used to fund the develpment of new NeX items.
Actually don't imagine -- This is exactly what they have said.
How are you being double charged? Your subscription dollar is buying exactly what you wanted it to buy. FIS content, and by the looks of the winter expansion, some pretty good FIS content too.
Suppose I could prove to you, in fact, with accounting tables, etc that NONE of your subscription money went towards creating this stuff -- If that were the case, how would the mere existence of a NeX store imply that you were being double charged? |

The Offerer
Republic University Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:57:00 -
[195] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Quote:Here's a hint: You dont need extra real life money to create a Tier 3 BC. You do with any NeX item.
I pay for all NeX items with ISK, as can you. I will pay for Tier 3 BC with ISK, as will you. If I don't have the ISK for either one I can pay cash instead, as can you. I am not being forced to pay double if I wish to aquire either one unless I wish to. Sorry you are having difficulty understanding this fundamental point, but there it is.
What part of this graph would you like to be removed from the game because of non-vanity MT item and which other parts of the gameplay will be affected with the removal of need or a significant decrease of demand for a certain player generated item?
http://go-dl.eve-files.com/media/1106/MTGraph01.jpg
NeX items, that are by the definition vanity items only, does not affect delicate connections in an environment with player generated content and player run economy. Yes, you can buy everything with ISK, but the important part is where the products are coming from and how will it affect the rest of the gameplay.
By saying:
Quote:I pay for all NeX items with ISK, as can you. I will pay for Tier 3 BC with ISK, as will you.
you just show that you have a typical consumer mentality. You just don't care where the goods are coming from and who's affected by the method of its production as long as you can buy them. That, however, is very important in this game. |

Aldan Romar
Imperial Academy
38
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:02:00 -
[196] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:... then we will know by their actions that they don't regret NEX at all -- they just regret that we didn't all drop to our knees and blow them for it. CCP regrets the NEX and not that it didn't turn out the way they planned? |

Roime
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:03:00 -
[197] - Quote
The Offerer wrote:What part of this graph would you like to be removed from the game because of non-vanity MT item and which other parts of the gameplay will be affected with the removal of need or a significant decrease of demand for a certain player generated item?
Derp
You forgot that to generate a skinned ship you actually need a player-manufactured hull, and the skin. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
790
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:04:00 -
[198] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Because CCP don't need to delay ships for the umpteenth time. Why would it delay anything to use the LP store or just create a dropdown menu in the ship fitting window with a list of all the skins? This the part where you realise that you were somehow incompetent enough to miss 90.2% of the words in my post. Good job. That takes a special kind of person. Ok then explain in really small words why anything would need to be delayed if they weren't going to put ship skins on the NeX.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
238
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:05:00 -
[199] - Quote
The Offerer wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Quote:Here's a hint: You dont need extra real life money to create a Tier 3 BC. You do with any NeX item.
I pay for all NeX items with ISK, as can you. I will pay for Tier 3 BC with ISK, as will you. If I don't have the ISK for either one I can pay cash instead, as can you. I am not being forced to pay double if I wish to aquire either one unless I wish to. Sorry you are having difficulty understanding this fundamental point, but there it is. What part of this graph would you like to be removed from the game because of non-vanity MT item and which other parts of the gameplay will be affected with the removal of need or a significant decrease of demand for a certain player generated item? http://go-dl.eve-files.com/media/1106/MTGraph01.jpgNeX items, that are by the definition vanity items only, does not affect delicate connections in an environment with player generated content and player run economy. Yes, you can buy everything with ISK, but the important part is where the products are coming from and how will it affect the rest of the gameplay. By saying: Quote:I pay for all NeX items with ISK, as can you. I will pay for Tier 3 BC with ISK, as will you.
If I don't have the ISK for either one I can pay cash instead, as can you.
you just show that you have a typical consumer mentality. You just don't care where the goods are coming from and who's affected by the method of its production as long as you can buy them.  That, however, is very important in this game.
Excellent points, which we have already covered. It's perfectly understandable that you missed it, this thread has expanded quickly.
The quick and dirty response is simply that development of the NeX store interface is still being expanded so that it can properly handle selling BPC's or accept player made goods as part of the purchase price.
For reference check the interview's conducted during the Allaince Tournament and Dev Blogs explaining why the Ishukone Watch scorpion was not put up for sale via the NeX until after one solution or the other was functional. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation RONA Directorate
235
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:10:00 -
[200] - Quote
Roime wrote:
You forgot that to generate a skinned ship you actually need a player-manufactured hull, and the skin.
Quoting to remind people that you will need the t1 ship and the ship skin bpc to make the skinned ship.
WHICH will be destroyable and make epic kill mails and tears. |
|

Hallorin
State War Academy Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:15:00 -
[201] - Quote
Hallorin wrote:Suppose I could prove to you, in fact, with accounting tables, etc that NONE of your subscription money went towards creating this stuff -- If that were the case, how would the mere existence of a NeX store imply that you were being double charged? Edit: Here's the initial and relevant claims from CCP on the NeX store from one of the first dev blogs about itQuote:What I'm driving at is that a lot of people want to be able to customize their characters, ships or surroundings to either make themselves stand out or because they like pretty things or maybe they just like playing dress up. I don't know and I'm not one to judge.
The problem with customizability, however, is the amount of time and resources needed to produce unique items and variations. Bear in mind that our HQ is a renovated fish processing plant, not the Wonka factory, and we're fresh out of Oompa Loompas to build these incredible things. So we're left with the question of how to give you the customizability and uniqueness you want without simply raising the subscription rate.
Enter virtual goods sales.
This is important so I'll say more.
I am not saying the NeX IS this way. Indeed, I do think our subs did go to pay for the development of DUST and when incarna launched I was like a lot of people who were dissapointed and shot the monument in Jita.
But it's also not necessaryily or automatically a bad thing if done right. It certainly does not automatically mean that you get double charged.
Just the opposite actually, as it gives the player some flexibility in what features they actually wanted to pay for.
As the initial devblog quote makes clear, one option was just to raise the subscription rate, but CCP rightly felt that some wouldn't like that, so instead they made it optional.
To make this point, suppose (just for example) that a person never engaged in PI, or POS warfare, or FW or some other part of eve.
Now suppose they had the option of reducing their monthly sub by $5 to eliminate that content. If they ever decided to do it, they could pay the full $15, but since they never used those features, they were more than happy to only pay $10
If this were how eve was paid, would we all be crying about how CCP wants to 'double charge' us for PI and that we should just get it in our $10 sub fee. -- but that suddenly by everyone having to pay for it it's now ok?
Would it really be better for everyone to share the costs?
Again, this is all in the abstract. I'm not saying CCP has used all NeX funds to pay for NeX items. Certainly not actually (since they have probably made very little on NeX) but this was the long term plan
And, if it means adding more content to the game than we'd otherwise get, I'm ok with that (within obvious and oft repeated limits)
|

Gevlin
SMANews.net SpaceMonkey's Alliance
29
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:16:00 -
[202] - Quote
I am willing to pay Nex for making my roqual jet black with red trim and all my loaner Hulks the same colour (just so I know which ones are my toys)
But They are still revamping the ships doing a new skin. I think the earliest we will ever see them will be in the summer. Video Blogg mentioned it was one of the longer term projects and not a short term winter project. I agree with several people: CCP needs to focus most of eve's recources on FIS, but the development of WIS still needs to continue, just as a slower and more efficient pace. In eve I wish to be more than just a machine. |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
110
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 06:31:00 -
[203] - Quote
I think I'm going to have to start calling Ranger1 the poster boy for the NEX Store.
Let's take a look at what the NEX Store removes from EVE and where it could have made positive additions: - Takes content and/or features that were previously slated to be delivered via traditional sandbox means and now sells them back to the players, also circumventing the player run economy in the process. - Deminishes additional things for the player manufacturing industrialists to do. - Removes any additional materiels that could be another stream of prospecting/PI gamplay. - Can't destroy them (when even PLEX can be destroyed, go figure) - Not allowing players to earn additional visual rewards via the LP system. - Giving those items meaning in the context of the game: . . . - Whoah look at that headpiece/jacket/special ship skin, logo, etc that guy has, that's a big effort to earn those items. I want to continue to play the game so I can earn them too. Real visual status symbols. . . . . . - Faction warfare clothes/skins/logos for earning a certain number of kills or a myriad of other things. . . . . . - Pirate clothes/skins/logos for destroying so many ISK's value of ships. . . . . . - Master Industrialist, special outfit so all and sundry know that you are. . . . . . - Voted biggest a-hole in EVE by your peers, wear the badge you now get with honour. . . . . . - Found a bunch of wormholes, get clothing/skins/logos to show you have. - ..... There are literally endless possibilites for interesting uses of what ended up in the NEX Store.
Ultimately the NEX Store has short changed the playerbase with it's inclusion.
What does the NEX Store really add to EVE: - A one off shiny. - ................. Okay I'm at a loss, I can't think of anything else.
It seems Ranger1 and some others believe the NEX Store is full of win ..... for who!!
Tell me, when you see one of the rare ships that was earned in EVE (like a tournament one), what do you think .... I bet it isn't 'oh look they bought a different ship in the cash shop'. No because they actually mean something.
So I'll have to ask Ranger1 why he's trying to peddle something that works against the player run economy in EVE and adds nothing to the sandbox or even any gameplay in general for that matter. Just wondering. Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

Drakarin
Paladin Nine Eternal Pretorian Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 07:00:00 -
[204] - Quote
It angers me, because it affects immersion. A lot of stuff in this fantastic game does. Alternative characters are a major one that will never go away, but really do take you out of the game. You're playing along, talking to your friend sort of in character, at least able to suspend your disbelief.. then he announces he's going to go on his alt, or brings along one at the same time (multiple accounts). Meh. I have absolutely no idea how people take enjoyment in this game if you can't suspend your disbelief.
As for real world trading, meh. Plex is bad enough. Buying virtual items with real world money is a direct feedback loop reminding you "Hey man, this is JUST a game and only about making money not about creating an amazing virtual world to escape to".
I know, I'm the minority here. People these days simply want to be the best, get the best items, and will do anything and everything to get there, if that's spending real world money to gain an advantage in game, so be it. I'm not sure why people are so worried about pay to win anyways, it already exists in the form of multiple accounts and PLEX. If you have the cash, you can buy ANYTHING in the game from day 1.
Often I wonder while I mission around, if Bill Gates decided to start playing EvE; he could buy all the isk in EvE and it wouldn't even phase him. He could quite literally buyout everyone in the game and make his own virtual space empire. All because he's a God in real life.
Well, guess what.. this is a game. I want to be immersed, and I want to be on a fair level with everyone else regardless of their real life status. But I can't do that, not when you can buy isk and virtual clothes // possibly ship skins (seriously..) with real world benjamins. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
276
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 07:18:00 -
[205] - Quote
I am extremely angry about ALL NPC stations in EVE Online. They break my immersion. Where do they come from? Who put them there? Why can't I control them? They're outside of the player controlled sandbox. Why can't we destroy them? We can't we build stations in highsec? My immersion is destroyed. Furthermore, what happens to the ISK on NPC owned repair services? It just disappears! This breaks the economy of EVE, because I say so and immersion is EVVVERRYYYTTHHHIINNNGGG.
CCP is missing out on a great opportunity to introduce a fully customisable station builder with NPC management, DUST514 integration, real-time water physics simulation for all the water flowing through pipes in the station and modelling of each individual sub-atomic particle.
In addition to this, I want fully sentient AI for every single citizen of New Eden. All n-trillion of them. Either that, or make every single citizen of New Eden completely player controlled. Maybe CCP could do this next expansion. Wait. CCP MUST DO IT NEXT EXPANSION EVE IS NOT A COMPLETELY PERFECTLY SIMULATED SANDBOX AND I AM FROTHING AT THE MOUTH IN ANGER. Why can't CCP do any of this!? The authenticity of EVE is crippled! I'm unsubbing all of my accounts because I'm SO SO MAD. |

Kengutsi Akira
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
153
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 07:20:00 -
[206] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:I am extremely angry about ALL NPC stations in EVE Online. They break my immersion. Where do they come from? Who put them there? Why can't I control them? They're outside of the player controlled sandbox. Why can't we destroy them? We can't we build stations in highsec? My immersion is destroyed. Furthermore, what happens to the ISK on NPC owned repair services? It just disappears! This breaks the economy of EVE, because I say so and immersion is EVVVERRYYYTTHHHIINNNGGG.
CCP is missing out on a great opportunity to introduce a fully customisable station builder with NPC management, DUST514 integration, real-time water physics simulation for all the water flowing through pipes in the station and modelling of each individual sub-atomic particle.
In addition to this, I want fully sentient AI for every single citizen of New Eden. All n-trillion of them. Either that, or make every single citizen of New Eden completely player controlled. Maybe CCP could do this next expansion. Wait. CCP MUST DO IT NEXT EXPANSION EVE IS NOT A COMPLETELY PERFECTLY SIMULATED SANDBOX AND I AM FROTHING AT THE MOUTH IN ANGER. Why can't CCP do any of this!? The authenticity of EVE is crippled! I'm unsubbing all of my accounts because I'm SO SO MAD.
aww look at the cute sarcastic troll
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=255722#post255722
My stance on WiS |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
879
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 07:28:00 -
[207] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:I am extremely angry about ALL NPC stations in EVE Online. They break my immersion. Where do they come from? Who put them there? Why can't I control them? They're outside of the player controlled sandbox. Why can't we destroy them? We can't we build stations in highsec? My immersion is destroyed. Furthermore, what happens to the ISK on NPC owned repair services? It just disappears! This breaks the economy of EVE, because I say so and immersion is EVVVERRYYYTTHHHIINNNGGG.
CCP is missing out on a great opportunity to introduce a fully customisable station builder with NPC management, DUST514 integration, real-time water physics simulation for all the water flowing through pipes in the station and modelling of each individual sub-atomic particle.
In addition to this, I want fully sentient AI for every single citizen of New Eden. All n-trillion of them. Either that, or make every single citizen of New Eden completely player controlled. Maybe CCP could do this next expansion. Wait. CCP MUST DO IT NEXT EXPANSION EVE IS NOT A COMPLETELY PERFECTLY SIMULATED SANDBOX AND I AM FROTHING AT THE MOUTH IN ANGER. Why can't CCP do any of this!? The authenticity of EVE is crippled! I'm unsubbing all of my accounts because I'm SO SO MAD. You shouldn't take getting trolled so personally. It makes you look childish.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
110
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 07:34:00 -
[208] - Quote
Hallorin wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
I already pay $15/month, why should I pay more? Time to face the fact that this is a failed experiment, and it deserved to fail.
This is more of the same Aur/Nex is AUTOMATICALLY bad crap that gets bandied about here too much. Now don't misunderstand me here. I am not arguing that NeX is great or that CCP will make good on what I am about to suggest but I'll try to prove that Aur/NeX is not automatically bad and that it doesn't NECESSARILY amount to double charging. Image, just for example, if some outside company or a modder created an add-on for EVE that contained, I don't know, some vanity items. Imagine CCP wasn't making these but a lot of players wanted them and they did not affect gameplay except in some vanity way. Now imagine CCP said, sure we don't care, it's ok, not against the EULA - go ahead. If outside company or modder charged for this service, nobody would say CCP was double charging them - because it would be money going to someone else entirely. Now imagine if instead, CCP, who was busy pumping out new ships, engine trails, shots that miss, hybrid balancing, UI upgrades, Beautiful backrounds, etc said: "Hey, why don't we create a new department that we can't really afford to pay, and they can create content that players like but these guys will sell it via MT. They will exist solely to provide the content that the players can pay for and support that department by buying" In other words, Just like the outside modder, No MT = No ability to provide that content. CCP is busy providing the all the content that subs can pay for but this new department functions just like the outside modder. It generates content based on the ADDITIONAL influx of money. So CCP isn't double charging in such a case -- not if they are busy providing all the actual content that subs can buy, which, it appears they are doing right now. If it was otherwise, CCP would not have just laid a bunch of people off. I swear some of you would be happier if CCP just said "You are right, We can't afford to make ship skins without MT so no ship skins for you." Edit: I feel I should reiterate. I'm not saying this IS what's happening. I don't know. Maybe CCP could just give us all of this. But it COULD be happening, and it most definitely could happen more in the future. I mean seriously, DUST is in some distant way a 'part' of eve. should they just give that away too so they don't 'double-charge' you? You do know that CCP was funding the development of 3 games off the back of the EVE subscribers/PLEX'ers don't you?
Your theories fall completely flat when put in context of what has been happening over the life of EVE. Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
879
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 07:38:00 -
[209] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote: You do know that CCP was funding the development of 3 games off the back of the EVE subscribers/PLEX'ers don't you?
They were developing Dust 514 and the Twilight mmo...what was the third game?
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
277
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 07:51:00 -
[210] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:You shouldn't take getting trolled so personally. It makes you look childish.
I was the one trolling. No one was trolling me. In fact, it appears you were trolled by my post as you felt obligated to reply in an attack. As we know, if the one to get trolled attacks the troll, then they took it personally.
Therefore, according to yourself, you look childish.
Thank you, and good day. |
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
879
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 07:54:00 -
[211] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:You shouldn't take getting trolled so personally. It makes you look childish.
I was the one trolling. No one was trolling me. In fact, it appears you were trolled by my post as you felt obligated to reply in an attack. As we know, if the one to get trolled attacks the troll, then they took it personally. Therefore, according to yourself, you look childish. Thank you, and good day. Um...ok
Hey you never did get around to explaining why CCP would have to delay ship skins if they didn't put them in the microtransaction superstore.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
277
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 08:06:00 -
[212] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Hey you never did get around to explaining why CCP would have to delay ship skins if they didn't put them in the microtransaction superstore.
I did.
Quote: Will there be an extra way to make skins, through player manufacturing? Player designed, or blueprints? What do you need to purchase or manufacture a skin? Will you buy skinned ships, or 'paint cans' which you use on ships? Will skinned ships, or 'paint cans' be on the market? They should, given that it'd be player driven. Where's the one-stop place for players to conveniently browse through available skins? How can the base prices of skins easily be regulated as a whole, from the one store database? Will skinned ships even support the LP store right now, given inventory IDs and whatnot which will be the same as unskinned, or differently skinned counterparts? Which LP store will sell the more 'generic' skins, with no particular faction/corporation theme? When custom corp logos on ships become available, will LP stores inexplicably sell those too? Or will it be on yet another store, leaving the ship customisation interface split? What will be most profitable for CCP? How will the vanity items of ship skins affect the prices of non-vanity items such as CNRs and other LP items? Is this a good thing? If a player wants to skin their Rokh with a Mordus skin, will they need to be required to fly to a Mordus LP store? How many extra LP stores do we need to introduce? Would it be fitting for players to buy pirate skins from faction LP stores? Where does the plot fit? How can skinning a ship be most convenient for a player? Will LP stores and the market need to be updated with a specialised skin-browsing interface, so players can see more than tiny icons and get a preview of the skin quickly and easily? How will the plethora of skins be sorted along with all of the other items? When will the scroll bar get too painful to scroll through? Will we be able to reskin ships? Will this mean that LP stores need every single combination of a skin-exchange listed? Or do all ships need a new identifier value?
And there you have it. With the NeX store, many of those questions don't need to be asked, answered or developed around. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
881
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 08:10:00 -
[213] - Quote
So you don't have any real evidence? Just stuff you made up?
That's disappointing. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
881
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 08:12:00 -
[214] - Quote
Don't get me wrong: the skins *will* be in the NeX but you trying to make that into a good thing is p funny. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
277
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 08:14:00 -
[215] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Don't get me wrong: the skins *will* be in the NeX but you trying to make that into a good thing is p funny. It's not a good thing. It's a thing which doesn't even matter. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
813
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 08:19:00 -
[216] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Let me quote myself in case you don't get the whole PLEX cycle. Quote: The person that buys the PLEX with cash gets exactly what they want for their money. They get ISK.  The person that buys the vanity item with and ISK purchased PLEX gets exactly what they want. The vanity item in question without spending their own cash to aquire it.  CCP gets exactly what they want. The get the income from the original PLEX purchase..
Except CCP already got their income from the person buying PLEX in point 1.
What is the point of NeX store again?
Because in your example the only thing NeX "achieves" is short-circuiting player industry and cheapening the experience of gaining new content.
Player wanting the ship skin/piece of clothing/whatever and buying with isk rendered down from Plex has already paid CCP a microtransaction fee in essence - why shouldn't the isk be payed to a player who played the game a little to build/lp purchase/discover the item in question to enrich general gameplay as well?
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
277
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 08:26:00 -
[217] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:So you don't have any real evidence? Just stuff you made up?
That's disappointing. This thread consists entirely of speculation and opinions. All anti-NeX-skin opinions can be boiled down to 'It's not perfectly sandbox so it fails'. How's that any better? In fact, it's worse. Many things in EVE aren't perfectly sandbox, and NeX skins could be just another.
|

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
813
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 08:38:00 -
[218] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Quote:Here's a hint: You dont need extra real life money to create a Tier 3 BC. You do with any NeX item.
I pay for all NeX items with ISK, as can you. I will pay for Tier 3 BC with ISK, as will you. If I don't have the ISK for either one I can pay cash instead, as can you. I am not being forced to pay double if I wish to aquire either one unless I wish to. Sorry you are having difficulty understanding this fundamental point, but there it is.
Whreas the fundamental point you don't appear to get Ranger 1 is that when I buy an item in Eve Online I want to be buying that item from another player as a preference.This because I enjoy the economic sandbox. I like browsing for bargains on contracts, I like haggling and bartering. I like buying things that are complicated and challenging to make.
When I buy a tier 3 BC then out there some player organization has built the things, harvested the minerals, production-lined the blueprints and produced the ships. I like this. Its my preference to buy things produced in this process.
I look at something that comes through the NeX store and it disgusts me because its an injection of content through an alien (out of game cash store) methodology that doesn't give any players the opportunity to take part in its manufacture. It serves no reasonable purpose (CCP already have MT through PleX) and the only thing NeX does is break suspension of disbelief both ingame (poor rationalization of corporate ubiquity and NeX identity) and to be honest, as players since it looks and feels like a cheapening of the subscription model - ie content that is not naturally part of the client.
Now sure, you can argue its just extra steps between plex -> isk -> plex - > aurum blah. But nobody is answering the question of what we need NeX for if we've already got PLEX to make CCP extra income. (oh but its essential for the dust link ain't it! - on which we have no details conveniently of course)
But Ithe essetial point here is that CCP have microtransactions already that don't break the game - called PLEX. They allow CCP to get extra income and rich players to buy extra access to game content (without ring-fencing specific content behind the NeX store) while not cheapening or circumventing player industry or ruining content provision in the single server universe.
So the big question once again.
Is what is NeX for?
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
813
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 08:39:00 -
[219] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:So you don't have any real evidence? Just stuff you made up?
That's disappointing. This thread consists entirely of speculation and opinions. All anti-NeX-skin opinions can be boiled down to 'It's not perfectly sandbox so it fails'. How's that any better? In fact, it's worse. Many things in EVE aren't perfectly sandbox, and NeX skins could be just another.
Perhaps you'd like to take a shot at answering the core question - What is NeX for?
And in a bit (after another cup of coffee) I'll happily explain to you why NeX-Quisling is pretty appropriate term for you guys :)
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
813
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 08:58:00 -
[220] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Tristan North wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
How is it better than the traditional way of releasing content to us?
Because it allows a common marketing system with DUST.
How can you have a common marketing system that mixes Pay to Win (gold tanks and hovercraft etc) with strictly and (sic) "vanity only" in the same store with any degree of credibility really.
NeX is basically a malformed abortion of a concept. Its supposed to be an Amarrian fashion house (noble appliances) that got roped into clothes selling by CCP Monocles and CCP thousand dollar jeans last summer and we're supposed to believe it will now be selling golden tanks and platinum hovercraft for PTW Dust battles without negatively impacting the Eve economic sandbox.
Its frankly ridiculous.
If they want a currency that allows eve players to interact with Dust (which can involve rich dust players bribing eve players to provide bombardment support etc) then it should be about mercenary payments and be a concept similar to the "c-bills" from the Battletech universe and be strictly focused on currency transfer between capsuleer and groundside military.
Start from the beginning. Ditch the NeX store. Don't use that nonsense in Eve because CCP already have Plex for MT income there.
Introduce a new merc hiring organization for groundside Dust Infantry and have the common currency there. Make becoming a licensed (recognized) Dust contractor/hirer - contigent on putting down some "c-bills" that get you access to the interface (obviously also tradeable with isk) - don't force people who want nothing to do with the concept of cash shop to see it on their interface every dock.
And don't call it Aurum because it sounds crap.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
|

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
813
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 09:02:00 -
[221] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Hey you never did get around to explaining why CCP would have to delay ship skins if they didn't put them in the microtransaction superstore.
I did. Quote: Will there be an extra way to make skins, through player manufacturing? Player designed, or blueprints? What do you need to purchase or manufacture a skin? Will you buy skinned ships, or 'paint cans' which you use on ships? Will skinned ships, or 'paint cans' be on the market? They should, given that it'd be player driven. Where's the one-stop place for players to conveniently browse through available skins? How can the base prices of skins easily be regulated as a whole, from the one store database? Will skinned ships even support the LP store right now, given inventory IDs and whatnot which will be the same as unskinned, or differently skinned counterparts? Which LP store will sell the more 'generic' skins, with no particular faction/corporation theme? When custom corp logos on ships become available, will LP stores inexplicably sell those too? Or will it be on yet another store, leaving the ship customisation interface split? What will be most profitable for CCP? How will the vanity items of ship skins affect the prices of non-vanity items such as CNRs and other LP items? Is this a good thing? If a player wants to skin their Rokh with a Mordus skin, will they need to be required to fly to a Mordus LP store? How many extra LP stores do we need to introduce? Would it be fitting for players to buy pirate skins from faction LP stores? Where does the plot fit? How can skinning a ship be most convenient for a player? Will LP stores and the market need to be updated with a specialised skin-browsing interface, so players can see more than tiny icons and get a preview of the skin quickly and easily? How will the plethora of skins be sorted along with all of the other items? When will the scroll bar get too painful to scroll through? Will we be able to reskin ships? Will this mean that LP stores need every single combination of a skin-exchange listed? Or do all ships need a new identifier value?
And there you have it. With the NeX store, many of those questions don't need to be asked, answered or developed around.
So NeX is good because it means CCP don't need to put any thought whatsoever into how new content is delivered in Eve Online or pay any respect whatsoever to existing lore and background in the sandbox?
You are a terrible poster.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
278
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 09:03:00 -
[222] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Perhaps you'd like to take a shot at answering the core question - What is NeX for? NeX is to: -Earn more cash for CCP. Cash which they spend on EVE. -Act as a PLEX sink -Act as a clothing store -Contain vanity items only -Safely and quickly introduce content which does not radically affect EVE
Player interaction (whether clothes-making or skin-making) is preferable for authenticity, but this sandbox authenticity is not the only component of EVE which matters.
Advantages of ship skins on NeX -Fast release. We get skins ASAP. -Minimal impact on EVE -One-stop, unified place for skin purchase -More PLEX demand, more profit, more EVE
Disadvantages of ship skins on NeX -Less player interaction
__
Advantages of player manufactured ship skins -Another profession is added to EVE -A more 'intact' sandbox
Disadvantages of player manufactured ship skins -It takes time, thought, and careful planning to implement the interface and manufacturing methods -CCP can't earn more cash through greater PLEX demand
And that's the way it is. Any problems with my analysis? In my eyes, I don't care whether skins are on NeX or anything else. In CCP's eyes, they want a perfect balance between community contentment and profit. In your eyes, NeX is automatically bad because it harms the sandbox and CCP earns money from it.
I want you to see NeX as something with both bad and good sides. NeX doesn't break the sandbox. NeX doesn't contribute to the sandbox.
EDIT: Can you show me some respect? I'm giving it to you. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1359
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 09:30:00 -
[223] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:And there you have it. With the NeX store, many of those questions don't need to be asked, answered or developed around. No. The exact same questions have to be asked regardless. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
882
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 09:33:00 -
[224] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:EDIT: Can you show me some respect? I'm giving it to you. As long as you're advocating for the NeX I doubt you'll get much respect. Maybe you missed all the fun over the summer but the vast majority of Eve players find the microtransaction store in a subscription based game to be loathsome.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
278
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 09:40:00 -
[225] - Quote
Tippia wrote:DarkAegix wrote:And there you have it. With the NeX store, many of those questions don't need to be asked, answered or developed around. No. The exact same questions have to be asked regardless.
 Even these ones?
Quote:If a player wants to skin their Rokh with a Mordus skin, will they need to be required to fly to a Mordus LP store? How many extra LP stores do we need to introduce?
It's not even just asking the questions. It's answering them. Then coding the answer.
Ladie Harlot wrote:As long as you're advocating for the NeX Swing and a miss. That's just the way you want to see it. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
882
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 09:42:00 -
[226] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:As long as you're advocating for the NeX Swing and a miss. That's just the way you want to see it. So you've managed to confuse yourself? You haven't exactly been subtle in your support for it. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Genghis Kitty
Hello Kitty Online Adventurers
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 09:47:00 -
[227] - Quote
As long as I can get a Hello Kitty skin I'll pay an entire year's salary! 
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/3925/clipimage001xn2.jpg Dyslexics of the world untie! |

Lexmana
Imperial Stout
52
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 09:53:00 -
[228] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:NeX pros and cons ...
Ladie Harlot wrote:As long as you're advocating for the NeX I doubt you'll get much respect. Maybe you missed all the fun over the summer but the vast majority of Eve players find the microtransaction store in a subscription based game to be loathsome.
DarkAegix ou make a decent analysis. However, so does Lady Harlot.
And, your analysis is based on a critical assumption that NeX will only be used to push a small amount of vanity Items into the EVE sandbox. Can we really trust CCP to put such constraints on their actions now that they have deployed the infrastructure to do so much more? |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
278
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 10:39:00 -
[229] - Quote
Lexmana wrote: And, your analysis is based on a critical assumption that NeX will only be used to push a small amount of vanity Items into the EVE sandbox. Can we really trust CCP to put such constraints on their actions now that they have deployed the infrastructure to do so much more?
So far so good, right?  |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
815
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 10:42:00 -
[230] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote: NeX is to: -Earn more cash for CCP. Cash which they spend on EVE.
PLEX already fills this role. All NeX does is cut players out of the production loop to the detriment of the economic sandbox.
Quote:-Act as a PLEX sink
Any expensive (ingame isk) desirable content does this. If Ship skins came from the LP store and required 100,000 lps per skin they would sell like hotcakes still. People would trade plex to afford the market prices.
Quote:-Act as a clothing store
Lazy programming, poor in-game rationale, angers the player base because options that were previously included in the old character generator are no longer there and have been replaced with MT bought stuff.This stuff should be either in the character generator or on the market manufactured and sold by PLAYERS for PLAYERS.
Quote:-Contain vanity items only
Vanity argument is void when you consider that other Vanity items (nebulas and engine trails, new turrets, new cynos, new effects are all essentially Vanity.) And when we get to the point of corp logos being considered "vanity" I will sigh - since many people realize advertising and promoting one's corp is serious business - hence why so many pay big isk for eon ads, alliance tourney promos and login mentions.
Quote:-Safely and quickly introduce content which does not radically affect EVE
The notion its possible to introduce indestructable customization into this economic sandbox without radically affecting the game is nonsense. Short circuiting player industry is a huge effect and has already caused massive player discontent.
[qiote] Advantages of ship skins on NeX -Fast release. We get skins ASAP. -Minimal impact on EVE -One-stop, unified place for skin purchase -More PLEX demand, more profit, more EVE
Disadvantages of ship skins on NeX -Less player interaction
__
Advantages of player manufactured ship skins -Another profession is added to EVE -A more 'intact' sandbox
Disadvantages of player manufactured ship skins -It takes time, thought, and careful planning to implement the interface and manufacturing methods -CCP can't earn more cash through greater PLEX demand
And that's the way it is. Any problems with my analysis? In my eyes, I don't care whether skins are on NeX or anything else. In CCP's eyes, they want a perfect balance between community contentment and profit. In your eyes, NeX is automatically bad because it harms the sandbox and CCP earns money from it.
I want you to see NeX as something with both bad and good sides. NeX doesn't break the sandbox. NeX doesn't contribute to the sandbox.[/quote]
On your perceived advantages of ship skins in NeX:
1. Fast is not always better. We have a history in Eve of features being rushed out of the door and never finished. I am hoping this new CCP will actually take the time to deliver features and content correctly and stop the half-assed rollout of embarrassingly poor features. Your argument led to PI, it led to FW, it led to T3 ships all never being finished. Quick introduction GÇô no iteration.
2. There is massive impact on eve from the spreading corruption of overt MT without player interaction. It is a foot in the door for the cash store and will inevitably lead to arguments from CCP monocle and CCP thousand dollar jeans that its right for people to get out the credit card and pay $ to be special. That road leads to exclusive MT content that you canGÇÖt trade for isk.
3. Who needs a one-stop unified place for skin purchase? ThatGÇÖs just lazy universe-breaking dumbing down of the Eve setting. Why on earth should the corporations and factions of eve sell their ship skin designs through the same mono-corporate entity. Put the damn things in the LP store, let players buy and sell them for profit and JITA is your GÇ£one stop shopGÇ¥.
4. More PLEX demand happens anyway if these are in the LP stores so the argument is void.
5. I really donGÇÖt see how you can see time, thoughtful planning and development of interface as a GÇ£downsideGÇ¥ GÇô and I also do not agree that PLEX demand will be stifled by having these skins player manufactured. I counter that it will be ENHANCED because people who are disgusted by NeX in the sandbox will be happy to buy ship skins that come via traditional routes (even something simple like the LP stores)
So thats my problem with your analysis point by point.
NeX is something I see as entirely bad from beginning to now. I want it gone entirely from Eve online and I think youGÇÖd probably find the grand majority of Eve developers would agree with me. As a concept it was foisted on the company (and player base) by a couple of hired in GÇ£industry expertsGÇ¥ and courted by some extremely naive producers GÇ£CCP soundwaveGÇ¥ including GÇô who simply couldnGÇÖt understand the opposition to the notion of paying MT extras in an already expensive subscription game that we pay for and play because we LIKE the integrity of the single server economic sandbox.
Now this is a respecful post in reply to you DarkAegix, and proper respect in return is you addressing these points not simply skirting over them.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
|

Jennifer Starling
Imperial Navy Forum Patrol
250
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 10:42:00 -
[231] - Quote
NeX store is bleh. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1362
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 10:45:00 -
[232] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote: Even these ones? GÇ£If a player wants to skin their Rokh with a Mordus skin, will they need to be required to fly to a Mordus LP store? How many extra LP stores do we need to introduce?GÇ¥ Yes. Just because you have a particular answer to the question (GÇ£Nah, let's just stick it into the NeXGÇ¥) doesn't remove the question. In fact, it just raises additional questions regarding why on earth a specific skin isn't available from a specific vendor, and why you'd want to cut players out from the process of determining rarity.
By the way, since I missed it the first time around:
Quote:NeX is to: -Earn more cash for CCP. Cash which they spend on EVE. -Act as a PLEX sink
-Act as a clothing store
-Contain vanity items only
-Safely and quickly introduce content which does not radically affect EVE The latter three points are not reasons to have a NeX store since they are already handled far better by different mechanics already in the game.
Quote:Advantages of ship skins on NeX
-Fast release. We get skins ASAP.
-Minimal impact on EVE
-One-stop, unified place for skin purchase -More PLEX demand, more profit, more EVE The notion that it takes less time to release through the NeX is a false one GÇö it must be updated through patching just like the market. The impact of the NeX isGǪ quite spectacular, as we've seen over the last months. Moreover, even if it did have minimal impact, the same minimal impact could be reached using the pre-existing tools. At the same time, it raises the question of whether it shouldn't have an impactGǪ by, for instance, adding more industrial options or broadening the range of viable LP stores or allowing for more variety and options in your investments and money-making schemes.
Oh, and the market already provides a unified place for skin purchase.
This leaves one actual point: the NeX is there to act as a PLEX sink, presumably to make CCP more money. That is its only role, only purpose, only function. Everything else is already done, and done better, by pre-existing mechanics. Against this stands the immense disadvantage of disallowing the content to be part of the normal industrial cycle, thereby robbing the game from gameplay content. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 10:48:00 -
[233] - Quote
I won't be angry. Provided said skins are:
a) permanent (like the apparel seems to be)
b) didn't make monocles look cheap
c) didn't make me question if it was "Bring Your Kid to Work" Day |

Lexmana
Imperial Stout
52
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 10:51:00 -
[234] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Lexmana wrote: And, your analysis is based on a critical assumption that NeX will only be used to push a small amount of vanity Items into the EVE sandbox. Can we really trust CCP to put such constraints on their actions now that they have deployed the infrastructure to do so much more?
So far so good, right? 
Slippery slope ... |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
815
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 11:00:00 -
[235] - Quote
Dyner wrote:I won't be angry. Provided said skins are:
a) permanent (like the apparel seems to be)
Here we have it ladies and gentlemen. Why (some) people want ship skins through the NeX store is that basically they don't like the idea their $ bought stuff can be blown up.
(And pro-Nex quislings wonder why the rest of us believe NeX is not Eve.)
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 11:10:00 -
[236] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Dyner wrote:I won't be angry. Provided said skins are:
a) permanent (like the apparel seems to be) Here we have it ladies and gentlemen. Why (some) people want ship skins through the NeX store is that basically they don't like the idea their $ bought stuff can be blown up.
Eh, it goes back to "b". If it's cheap 1k - 2k then I don't mind if it's destructible. If it's say valued at $1000 (lolpantsjoke) then no, it should not be destructible.
On the positive it forces CCP to come up with new skins instead of making us 4 skins and sitting back raking in the cash.
Think about it. Would CCP continue to develop content (in any form) for EVE if they knew all the current subs would keep paying. Forego the fact they of course want to GET new subs.
The answer is 'no', they would not. Why invest unnecessary funds into something if you know you'll get the same return.
I would also add. It'd be nice if they didn't add skins per say to to NEX but instead a skill book set (recipe books) that teach players how to make various dyes. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
815
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 11:28:00 -
[237] - Quote
Dyner wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Dyner wrote:I won't be angry. Provided said skins are:
a) permanent (like the apparel seems to be) Here we have it ladies and gentlemen. Why (some) people want ship skins through the NeX store is that basically they don't like the idea their $ bought stuff can be blown up. Eh, it goes back to "b". If it's cheap 1k - 2k then I don't mind if it's destructible. If it's say valued at $1000 (lolpantsjoke) then no, it should not be destructible. On the positive it forces CCP to come up with new skins instead of making us 4 skins and sitting back raking in the cash. Think about it. Would CCP continue to develop content (in any form) for EVE if they knew all the current subs would keep paying. Forego the fact they of course want to GET new subs. The answer is 'no', they would not. Why invest unnecessary funds into something if you know you'll get the same return. I would also add. It'd be nice if they didn't add skins per say to to NEX but instead a skill book set (recipe books) that teach players how to make various dyes.
So lets agree instead that NeX is bad, ship skins should come through traditional gameplay (like agent lp stores) and skins can range from dirt cheap to expensive (based on rarety on lp points) and be fully destructable just like rigs ?
You happy with that?
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 11:42:00 -
[238] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:[quote=Dyner][quote=Jade Constantine][quote=Dyner]
You happy with that?

I actually like the NEX, because the alternative(s) is (are):
a) Raise Sub fee b) Raise Player population c) both
a) should maintain EVE as "EVE" b) would require the [further] dumbing down of EVE into more of a WoW In Space c) more the latter (b) then nickel diming those players
---
And in the end I was just answering the OP about what would not make me angry if ship skins were put on the NEX. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
815
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 11:55:00 -
[239] - Quote
Dyner wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:[quote=Dyner][quote=Jade Constantine][quote=Dyner]
You happy with that?
 I actually like the NEX, because the alternative(s) is (are): a) Raise Sub fee b) Raise Player population c) both
You have forgotten "alternative" option D.
d) stop wasting subs money that is completely sufficient to run and develop eve plus 1 other major project on 2 other projects. (By scaling down WOD CCP have saved more money than NeX would ever raise for this game).
protip ... CCP have chosen option D.
But the broader point is that NeX does NOTHING whatsoever to increase revenue over and above PLEX sales. If Eve has attractive expensive player manufactured content that people want and need isk to buy then some will get that isk by buying and coverting PLEX and this will increase revenue for CCP without taking players out of the loop in player industry.
Hence PLEX is a good way for CCP to raise more money.
NEX is a bad way.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 12:08:00 -
[240] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote: You have forgotten "alternative" option D.
d) stop wasting subs money that is completely sufficient to run and develop eve plus 1 other major project on 2 other projects. (By scaling down WOD CCP have saved more money than NeX would ever raise for this game).
protip ... CCP have chosen option D.
But the broader point is that NeX does NOTHING whatsoever to increase revenue over and above PLEX sales. If Eve has attractive expensive player manufactured content that people want and need isk to buy then some will get that isk by buying and coverting PLEX and this will increase revenue for CCP without taking players out of the loop in player industry.
Hence PLEX is a good way for CCP to raise more money.
NEX is a bad way.
I think the NEX's primary goal was to eat PLEXs, thus causing an rise in the amount purchased (to be sold in game).
If I had a choice it'd be between NEX and LP Store for ship skins....for the love of god don't code drops..missions...fix the ones already in place xD |
|

Zowie Powers
Hole in the wall
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 12:11:00 -
[241] - Quote
Does OP understand that almost nobody cared at all if ship skins were sold in NeX, that wasn't the point then and it isn't now.
Most of the people the OP seems to be addressing were all in favour of ship skins.
Ohhhhhh
OP is RvB. Well...
ok.... pat head.... well done OP. |

Bischopt
Ice Fire Warriors
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 12:13:00 -
[242] - Quote
Just popping in to agree with Jade and express my disgust towards NeX. I could say more but I'd just be saying the same things Jade's already said. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
278
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 12:50:00 -
[243] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:DarkAegix wrote: NeX is to: -Earn more cash for CCP. Cash which they spend on EVE. -Act as a PLEX sink
PLEX already fills this role. Of course PLEX fills the roll of being a PLEX sink. NeX makes it faster. What if the only ISK sink in the entire game was an NPC corp tax at 1%? Not fast enough. NeX is a PLEX sink. It doesn't matter if other things are: the more, the merrier right now.
Quote: 1. PLEX sink Any expensive (ingame isk) desirable content does this. If Ship skins came from the LP store and required 100,000 lps per skin they would sell like hotcakes still. People would trade plex to afford the market prices.
2. Clothing store Lazy programming, poor in-game rationale, angers the player base because options that were previously included in the old character generator are no longer there and have been replaced with MT bought stuff.This stuff should be either in the character generator or on the market manufactured and sold by PLAYERS for PLAYERS.
3. Contain vanity items only Vanity argument is void when you consider that other Vanity items (nebulas and engine trails, new turrets, new cynos, new effects are all essentially Vanity.) And when we get to the point of corp logos being considered "vanity" I will sigh - since many people realize advertising and promoting one's corp is serious business - hence why so many pay big isk for eon ads, alliance tourney promos and login mentions.
4. Safely and quickly introduce content which does not radically affect EVE The notion its possible to introduce indestructable customization into this economic sandbox without radically affecting the game is nonsense. Short circuiting player industry is a huge effect and has already caused massive player discontent.
1. NeX has a direct impact on PLEX prices, due to the inherent link between the two. Anything could act as a PLEX sink, but some things work better than others. The link is direct, as the only way to access NeX goods is through PLEX. The NeX store is the framework to a highly effective PLEX sink. You're even saying that in order for ship skins to be effective as a PLEX sink they need to be ludicrously pricey, in order to prompt players to buy PLEX. No thank you.
2. What items in the old character generator now need to be bought in the NeX store? Enlighten me. Don't tell me you want to roll back to the disgusting, cartoonish, old character portraits. It's just nostalgia talking. Won't putting the clothing directly on the character generator harm EVE, by your logic? I mean, players aren't earning from it! My sandbox! This is outrageous! New players should be naked ASAP.
3. You miss my point. I was stating a rule, not a benefit of the NeX store.
4. Player industry is not affected, stop saying it is. I haven't even said that ship skins should be indestructible, either. Is player industry negatively affected by CCP not having ship skins in the LP store right now? Is the price of Rifters suddenly a bil a piece because of this? All across EVE, are players suddenly realising they're playing a game whenever they see an item of clothing? Noticed a sudden swing of market prices for tritanium since the NeX store? Are we suffering because CCP don't make nebulae player-creatable? Your discontentment at however ship skins may be introduced is not the entire playerbase's discontentment.
More to come! Stay tuned! |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
816
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 13:11:00 -
[244] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote: Of course PLEX fills the roll of being a PLEX sink. NeX makes it faster. What if the only ISK sink in the entire game was an NPC corp tax at 1%? Not fast enough. NeX is a PLEX sink. It doesn't matter if other things are: the more, the merrier right now.
1. NeX has a direct impact on PLEX prices, due to the inherent link between the two. Anything could act as a PLEX sink, but some things work better than others. The link is direct, as the only way to access NeX goods is through PLEX. The NeX store is the framework to a highly effective PLEX sink. You're even saying that in order for ship skins to be effective as a PLEX sink they need to be ludicrously pricey, in order to prompt players to buy PLEX. No thank you.
NeX actually makes it slower because the player base (as a whole) is fairly disgusted by the concept. I know players who would have spent literally billions of isk on clothing had it been produced by players for players rather than in the NeX store. Instead they spent nothing (or spent the free aurom) hence had the clothing NOT been in the Nex store it would have been a more efficient ISK sink. (and of course having the stuff being actually destructable the more so).
And this is why you do put people's noses out of joint really. Now you are saying that you'd rather have cheap Aurum skins than expensive destructable player manufactured ones. Its a straw man argument. Nobody is saying the player manufactured (lp traded) skins have to all be stupidly expensive. But if they came from NeX they certainly would be. (and likely indestructable too).
Quote:2. What items in the old character generator now need to be bought in the NeX store? Enlighten me. Don't tell me you want to roll back to the disgusting, cartoonish, old character portraits. It's just nostalgia talking. Won't putting the clothing directly on the character generator harm EVE, by your logic? I mean, players aren't earning from it! My sandbox! This is outrageous! New players should be naked ASAP.
Nothing needs to be brought into the NeX store because the NeX store needs to be scrapped. But many racial specific actual scifi look designs for clothing do need to go back into the character generator and be available for players to manufacture in game for sale to other players. And no, putting clothing into the character generator will simply make eve a more attractive game to subscribers allowing a better level of customization and thereby retaining more subs money.
Quote:4. Player industry is not affected, stop saying it is. I haven't even said that ship skins should be indestructible, either. Is player industry negatively affected by CCP not having ship skins in the LP store right now? Is the price of Rifters suddenly a bil a piece because of this? All across EVE, are players suddenly realising they're playing a game whenever they see an item of clothing? Noticed a sudden swing of market prices for tritanium since the NeX store? Are we suffering because CCP don't make nebulae player-creatable? Your discontentment at however ship skins may be introduced is not the entire playerbase's discontentment.
Whereas of the two of us I can point at a mass unsub movement that CCP took notice of and you cannot. Do you think CCP will lose a signifcant number of subs if NeX store is removed? Will there be people shooting a statue in Jita over it? I think not. NeX is an unpopular concept because it is heavily perceived as CCP undervaluing their subscription and ring-fencing content off from the sandbox that is delivered by the cash shop rather than player industry.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
278
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 13:20:00 -
[245] - Quote
I can has strikethrough?
Tippia wrote:DarkAegix wrote: Even these ones? GÇ£If a player wants to skin their Rokh with a Mordus skin, will they need to be required to fly to a Mordus LP store? How many extra LP stores do we need to introduce?GÇ¥ Yes. Just because you have a particular answer to the question (GÇ£Nah, let's just stick it into the NeXGÇ¥) doesn't remove the question. In fact, it just raises additional questions regarding why on earth a specific skin isn't available from a specific vendor, and why you'd want to cut players out from the process of determining rarity. You snipped a bit off my post. Accident? Purpose? Some kind of selective reading disorder? 'It's not even just asking the questions. It's answering them. Then coding the answer.' All of those questions I posted require additional coding overhead. Whatever implementation CCP have decided on could be done by now, so it doesn't even matter to me anyway. NeX was the initial design goal, and may still be.
Quote: NeX is to: -Earn more cash for CCP. Cash which they spend on EVE. -Act as a PLEX sink
-Act as a clothing store
-Contain vanity items only
-Safely and quickly introduce content which does not radically affect EVE
Tippy said:
The latter three points are not reasons to have a NeX store since they are already handled far better by different mechanics already in the game.
I say: Name those mechanics for me. Is the LP store a clothing store? No. It's a loyalty point store. One which will be clogged with poorly sorted lists, and where players will need to jump 80 times in their terribly slow battleships to get a vanity item. What other store in EVE has vanity items only? How else can CCP safely implement content without affecting the sandbox, using something we already have?
Quote:Advantages of ship skins on NeX
-Fast release. We get skins ASAP.
-Minimal impact on EVE
-One-stop, unified place for skin purchase -More PLEX demand, more profit, more EVE
Tippily-Pops said:The notion that it takes less time to release through the NeX is a false one GÇö it must be updated through patching just like the market. The impact of the NeX isGǪ quite spectacular, as we've seen over the last months. Moreover, even if it did have minimal impact, the same minimal impact could be reached using the pre-existing tools. At the same time, it raises the question of whether it shouldn't have an impactGǪ by, for instance, adding more industrial options or broadening the range of viable LP stores or allowing for more variety and options in your investments and money-making schemes.
I say: Nope. NeX is faster. Skin manufacturing involves seeding across different databases, doing behind-the-scenes CCP Stuff(TM) which we can only guess at, updating legacy LP junk from prehistoric times and clogging the market with the hundreds of potential skins.
Tipsy said:
Oh, and the market already provides a unified place for skin purchase.
I say: But it doesn't supply skins, now does it? Besides, it's not that neatly organised . Hundreds of skins to browse through in uninteresting little tabs isn't entirely appealing. An interface which is more than the standard market or an LP store would be beneficial to skins. Whether NeX, a new interface, or an update to existing interfaces (market/LP)
Tipster said:
This leaves one actual point: the NeX is there to act as a PLEX sink, presumably to make CCP more money. That is its only role, only purpose, only function. Everything else is already done, and done better, by pre-existing mechanics. Against this stands the immense disadvantage of disallowing the content to be part of the normal industrial cycle, thereby robbing the game from gameplay content.
I say: I'm fine with CCP wanting to make money. If they sink enough PLEX to double their income from it, and spend this cash on EVE, then everything's golden as far as I'm concerned.
How exciting is the gameplay content of buying from an LP store, anyway? SERIOUSLY.
More exciting poasts to come! I may even throw in a few flames, if you guys are lucky!  |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1371
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 13:36:00 -
[246] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:'It's not even just asking the questions. It's answering them. Then coding the answer.' GǪwhich means it is in no way different than for the LP store or putting it on the market: so, again, going through the NeX does not remove the question.
Quote:Name those mechanics for me. -+ Act as a clothing store: the market already does this. You can also do it via contracts. -+ Contain vanity items only: the market already lets you filter this. As do contracts. -+ The NeX does not GÇ£safely implement content without affecting the sandboxGÇ£, nor should it. Content in EVE should affect the sandbox, or it has no place in a sandbox game.
Quote:Nope. NeX is faster. Skin manufacturing involves seeding across different databases, doing behind-the-scenes CCP Stuff(TM) which we can only guess at, updating legacy LP junk from prehistoric times and clogging the market with the hundreds of potential skins. GǪand the NeX requires the same steps, if you haven't noticed: seeding the databases, updating the store, and clogging the market with the items, and doing behind-the-scenes CCP stuff that we don't know anything about.
Quote:But it doesn't supply skins, now does it? Neither does the NeX.
Quote:How exciting is the gameplay content of buying from an LP store, anyway? Far more exciting than scrolling through an endless, unfiltered, poorly designed and completely non-interactive list of stuff. At least the collection of LP would require finding agents (possibly in hard-to-reach places) and running missions for them (which may include opponents you have never faced so far), which entails actual gameplay, rather than just browsing. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
816
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 13:37:00 -
[247] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote: I'm fine with CCP wanting to make money. If they sink enough PLEX to double their income from it, and spend this cash on EVE, then everything's golden as far as I'm concerned.
Pass me a hit of whatever you are smoking. Do you really think that the Eve subscriber base is suddenly going to buy enough Aurum to double CCP's income via NeX if Ship Skins are sold through the cash shop?
Last time they lost 20%.
CCP Zinfandel is that you?
Quote:How exciting is the gameplay content of buying from an LP store, anyway? SERIOUSLY.
Considerably better than NeX store.
Players do missions for specific factions/corporations - those factions/corporations offer rewards in custom skins. Want an epic blood-raider skin ? Go and mission in delve or buy it off somebody who has.
I suspect the answer will be ... "wahhhhhhhh but won't that make it expensive I want it all cheap and now!"
Welcome to Eve.
Where prestigious things are meant to be hard to get.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
278
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 13:42:00 -
[248] - Quote
Zowie Powers wrote:Does OP understand that almost nobody cared at all if ship skins were sold in NeX, that wasn't the point then and it isn't now.
Most of the people the OP seems to be addressing were all in favour of ship skins.
Ohhhhhh
OP is RvB. Well...
ok.... pat head.... well done OP. The entire thread is about NeX.  I will now commence flaming. Sorry if it isn't high quality enough.
1. I've never even heard of your corp 2. Zowie Powers sounds like it should rhyme, but it doesn't. Zowwy Powers, as the brain expects it should be pronounced, sounds stupid. (Pleasedon'tjudgemynamepleasedon'tjudgemyname) 3. At the time of this post I have 39.7x more likes than you. Therefore, I am better at everything. 4. You have no kills. I, however, have :elite: kills where myself and a fleet blobbed TCUs and other dangerous foes in my 0.0 PVPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP days. 5. Your bio is not interesting. 6. Your corp ticker is [6LORY]. 1337speak is not cool. 7. My character is older than yours, and so I have :bittervet: status over you. Any point you make I will ignore, because I can. 8. Your avatar has a lazy eye 9. Your avatar's background looks like the gas cloud to a comical bout of flatulence. 10. I can't think of something else
Also, have a free like.
I'll poast some more in a about a day. I have a life outside of forum PVP, you know! |

i5L4NDOF5T4BiLiTY
sHaKeDoWn..
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 13:50:00 -
[249] - Quote
"How exciting is the gameplay content of buying from an LP store, anyway? SERIOUSLY." You dont understand the sandbox do you. Someone would have to farm the LP for the new skins, then they would have to move those ships to jita for sale, then they would play market games against other traders. It would be another opportunity for people to be industrious in eve online, it would even have elements of risk vs reward. Slapping them in the Nex store is in everyway a erosion of the sandbox. Why do you want to dumb down EVE online? Why do you want less opportunities for trade? Why do you want any part of the game, to be outside of the sandbox? |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
818
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 13:59:00 -
[250] - Quote
i5L4NDOF5T4BiLiTY wrote:"How exciting is the gameplay content of buying from an LP store, anyway? SERIOUSLY." You dont understand the sandbox do you. Someone would have to farm the LP for the new skins, then they would have to move those ships to jita for sale, then they would play market games against other traders. It would be another opportunity for people to be industrious in eve online, it would even have elements of risk vs reward. Slapping them in the Nex store is in everyway a erosion of the sandbox. Why do you want to dumb down EVE online? Why do you want less opertuinities for trade? Why do you want any part of the game, to be outside the sandbox?
Its because he's a NeX Quisling 
Defined as a collaborator with a foreign power (in this case CCP Monocle's identikit MT empire) who believes in working with enemy to undermine the basis of Eve's historical culture (subscriptions and inclusive pro-sandbox content)
NeX Quislings love to talk about the surrender of Eve's virtue to PLEX and natural evolution to giving NeX handjobs to Aurum addicts on the bad side of town.
NeX Quislings also like instant content NOW RIGHT NOW! that they don't have to work for or interact with other PLAYERS with in any way shape or form.
NeX Quislings are pretty much single player gamers who don't like the sandbox aspect of Eve and are affronted that genuinely rare and prestigious content in Eve takes effort and negotiation to achieve and always involves interaction with other gamers.
CCP Zinfandel (aka CCP Monocle) is the patron saint of Eve's NeX Quisling movement and his followers wear neo-fascist NeXCarna clothing with monocles when they are out marching and calling for a fullscale PTW invasion of Eve Online by their MT paymasters elsewhere in the gaming world.
(--some of these points might be slightly tongue in cheek)
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
|

Zowie Powers
Hole in the wall
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:28:00 -
[251] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Zowie Powers wrote:Does OP understand that almost nobody cared at all if ship skins were sold in NeX, that wasn't the point then and it isn't now.
Most of the people the OP seems to be addressing were all in favour of ship skins.
Ohhhhhh
OP is RvB. Well...
ok.... pat head.... well done OP. The entire thread is about NeX.  I will now commence flaming. Sorry if it isn't high quality enough. 1. I've never even heard of your corp 2. Zowie Powers sounds like it should rhyme, but it doesn't. Zowwy Powers, as the brain expects it should be pronounced, sounds stupid. (Pleasedon'tjudgemynamepleasedon'tjudgemyname) 3. At the time of this post I have 39.7x more likes than you. Therefore, I am better at everything. 4. You have no kills. I, however, have :elite: kills where myself and a fleet blobbed TCUs and other dangerous foes in my 0.0 PVPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP days. 5. Your bio is not interesting. 6. Your corp ticker is [6LORY]. 1337speak is not cool. 7. My character is older than yours, and so I have :bittervet: status over you. Any point you make I will ignore, because I can. 8. Your avatar has a lazy eye 9. Your avatar's background looks like the gas cloud to a comical bout of flatulence. 10. I can't think of something else Also, have a free like. I'll poast some more in a about a day. I have a life outside of forum PVP, you know!
I can't believe you put that little boy down long enough to type that.
|
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
143

|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:42:00 -
[252] - Quote
Off topic posts removed. Please stay on topic, thank you. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1372
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:46:00 -
[253] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:Off topic posts removed. Please stay on topic, thank you. EhGǪ you removed quit a few on-topic posts as wellGǪ  GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
249
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:47:00 -
[254] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:I think I'm going to have to start calling Ranger1 the poster boy for the NEX Store.
Let's take a look at what the NEX Store removes from EVE and where it could have made positive additions: - Takes content and/or features that were previously slated to be delivered via traditional sandbox means and now sells them back to the players, also circumventing the player run economy in the process. - Deminishes additional things for the player manufacturing industrialists to do. - Removes any additional materiels that could be another stream of prospecting/PI gamplay. - Can't destroy them (when even PLEX can be destroyed, go figure) - Not allowing players to earn additional visual rewards via the LP system. - Giving those items meaning in the context of the game: . . . - Whoah look at that headpiece/jacket/special ship skin, logo, etc that guy has, that's a big effort to earn those items. I want to continue to play the game so I can earn them too. Real visual status symbols. . . . . . - Faction warfare clothes/skins/logos for earning a certain number of kills or a myriad of other things. . . . . . - Pirate clothes/skins/logos for destroying so many ISK's value of ships. . . . . . - Master Industrialist, special outfit so all and sundry know that you are. . . . . . - Voted biggest a-hole in EVE by your peers, wear the badge you now get with honour. . . . . . - Found a bunch of wormholes, get clothing/skins/logos to show you have. - ..... There are literally endless possibilites for interesting uses of what ended up in the NEX Store.
Ultimately the NEX Store has short changed the playerbase with it's inclusion.
What does the NEX Store really add to EVE: - A one off shiny. - ................. Okay I'm at a loss, I can't think of anything else.
It seems Ranger1 and some others believe the NEX Store is full of win ..... for who!!
Tell me, when you see one of the rare ships that was earned in EVE (like a tournament one), what do you think .... I bet it isn't 'oh look they bought a different ship in the cash shop'. No because they actually mean something.
So I'll have to ask Ranger1 why he's trying to peddle something that works against the player run economy in EVE and adds nothing to the sandbox or even any gameplay in general for that matter. Just wondering.
Perhaps you should actually read the posts that have been made that disprove every point you have made, repeatedly.  To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
249
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:49:00 -
[255] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:Hallorin wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
I already pay $15/month, why should I pay more? Time to face the fact that this is a failed experiment, and it deserved to fail.
This is more of the same Aur/Nex is AUTOMATICALLY bad crap that gets bandied about here too much. Now don't misunderstand me here. I am not arguing that NeX is great or that CCP will make good on what I am about to suggest but I'll try to prove that Aur/NeX is not automatically bad and that it doesn't NECESSARILY amount to double charging. Image, just for example, if some outside company or a modder created an add-on for EVE that contained, I don't know, some vanity items. Imagine CCP wasn't making these but a lot of players wanted them and they did not affect gameplay except in some vanity way. Now imagine CCP said, sure we don't care, it's ok, not against the EULA - go ahead. If outside company or modder charged for this service, nobody would say CCP was double charging them - because it would be money going to someone else entirely. Now imagine if instead, CCP, who was busy pumping out new ships, engine trails, shots that miss, hybrid balancing, UI upgrades, Beautiful backrounds, etc said: "Hey, why don't we create a new department that we can't really afford to pay, and they can create content that players like but these guys will sell it via MT. They will exist solely to provide the content that the players can pay for and support that department by buying" In other words, Just like the outside modder, No MT = No ability to provide that content. CCP is busy providing the all the content that subs can pay for but this new department functions just like the outside modder. It generates content based on the ADDITIONAL influx of money. So CCP isn't double charging in such a case -- not if they are busy providing all the actual content that subs can buy, which, it appears they are doing right now. If it was otherwise, CCP would not have just laid a bunch of people off. I swear some of you would be happier if CCP just said "You are right, We can't afford to make ship skins without MT so no ship skins for you." Edit: I feel I should reiterate. I'm not saying this IS what's happening. I don't know. Maybe CCP could just give us all of this. But it COULD be happening, and it most definitely could happen more in the future. I mean seriously, DUST is in some distant way a 'part' of eve. should they just give that away too so they don't 'double-charge' you? You do know that CCP was funding the development of 3 games off the back of the EVE subscribers/PLEX'ers don't you? Your theories fall completely flat when put in context of what has been happening over the life of EVE.
You do know that the NeX store items were farmed out to another company right?  To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Fille Balle
Ballbreakers R us
32
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:50:00 -
[256] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Its because he's a NeX Quisling 
What are you Norwegian? I have met few non-Norwegians that know of the name Quisling. Most people just use judas or somehting similar. Depends on their origin, but Quisling is not one I hear very often. Have you noticed how some ships are actually blue? Weird isn't it? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1373
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:51:00 -
[257] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote: Even these ones? GÇ£If a player wants to skin their Rokh with a Mordus skin, will they need to be required to fly to a Mordus LP store? How many extra LP stores do we need to introduce?GÇ¥ Yes. Just because you have a particular answer to the question (GÇ£Nah, let's just stick it into the NeXGÇ¥) doesn't remove the question. In fact, it just raises additional questions regarding why on earth a specific skin isn't available from a specific vendor, and why you'd want to cut players out from the process of determining rarity.
By the way, since I missed it the first time around:
Quote:NeX is to: -Earn more cash for CCP. Cash which they spend on EVE. -Act as a PLEX sink
-Act as a clothing store
-Contain vanity items only
-Safely and quickly introduce content which does not radically affect EVE The latter three points are not reasons to have a NeX store since they are already handled far better by different mechanics already in the game.
Quote:Advantages of ship skins on NeX
-Fast release. We get skins ASAP.
-Minimal impact on EVE
-One-stop, unified place for skin purchase -More PLEX demand, more profit, more EVE The notion that it takes less time to release through the NeX is a false one GÇö it must be updated through patching just like the market. The impact of the NeX isGǪ quite spectacular, as we've seen over the last months. Moreover, even if it did have minimal impact, the same minimal impact could be reached using the pre-existing tools. At the same time, it raises the question of whether it shouldn't have an impactGǪ by, for instance, adding more industrial options or broadening the range of viable LP stores or allowing for more variety and options in your investments and money-making schemes.
Oh, and the market already provides a unified place for skin purchase.
This leaves one actual point: the NeX is there to act as a PLEX sink, presumably to make CCP more money. That is its only role, only purpose, only function. Everything else is already done, and done better, by pre-existing mechanics. Against this stands the immense disadvantage of disallowing the content to be part of the normal industrial cycle, thereby robbing the game from gameplay content. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Leisen
Interrobang Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 14:55:00 -
[258] - Quote
I've been preparing to rage at the idea for about a week now.  |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
818
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:01:00 -
[259] - Quote
Fille Balle wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Its because he's a NeX Quisling  What are you Norwegian? I have met few non-Norwegians that know of the name Quisling. Most people just use judas or somehting similar. Depends on their origin, but Quisling is not one I hear very often.
British, where the name was quite knowingly subborned for propaganda purposes by the war-ministry in WW2. I can remember some black and white films about Vidkun Quisling when I was a school that played quite regularly on the tv. As noted on the wikipedia entry - it is a literal gift for propagandists because the word is so evocative of a nasty slimy little turncoat.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
818
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:03:00 -
[260] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Azahni Vah'nos wrote:Hallorin wrote:Jacob cirth wrote:
I already pay $15/month, why should I pay more? Time to face the fact that this is a failed experiment, and it deserved to fail.
This is more of the same Aur/Nex is AUTOMATICALLY bad crap that gets bandied about here too much. Now don't misunderstand me here. I am not arguing that NeX is great or that CCP will make good on what I am about to suggest but I'll try to prove that Aur/NeX is not automatically bad and that it doesn't NECESSARILY amount to double charging. Image, just for example, if some outside company or a modder created an add-on for EVE that contained, I don't know, some vanity items. Imagine CCP wasn't making these but a lot of players wanted them and they did not affect gameplay except in some vanity way. Now imagine CCP said, sure we don't care, it's ok, not against the EULA - go ahead. If outside company or modder charged for this service, nobody would say CCP was double charging them - because it would be money going to someone else entirely. Now imagine if instead, CCP, who was busy pumping out new ships, engine trails, shots that miss, hybrid balancing, UI upgrades, Beautiful backrounds, etc said: "Hey, why don't we create a new department that we can't really afford to pay, and they can create content that players like but these guys will sell it via MT. They will exist solely to provide the content that the players can pay for and support that department by buying" In other words, Just like the outside modder, No MT = No ability to provide that content. CCP is busy providing the all the content that subs can pay for but this new department functions just like the outside modder. It generates content based on the ADDITIONAL influx of money. So CCP isn't double charging in such a case -- not if they are busy providing all the actual content that subs can buy, which, it appears they are doing right now. If it was otherwise, CCP would not have just laid a bunch of people off. I swear some of you would be happier if CCP just said "You are right, We can't afford to make ship skins without MT so no ship skins for you." Edit: I feel I should reiterate. I'm not saying this IS what's happening. I don't know. Maybe CCP could just give us all of this. But it COULD be happening, and it most definitely could happen more in the future. I mean seriously, DUST is in some distant way a 'part' of eve. should they just give that away too so they don't 'double-charge' you? You do know that CCP was funding the development of 3 games off the back of the EVE subscribers/PLEX'ers don't you? Your theories fall completely flat when put in context of what has been happening over the life of EVE. You do know that the NeX store items were farmed out to another company right? 
Allegedly so. I personally have my doubts. What I will say is that when I served as CSM chairman I met at least one graphic designer on the CCP payroll who was employed purely to design space fashions. I have no idea if the chap is still employed by CCP or if he was involved in the NeX clothing - but it does make me doubt the full separation of NeX development effort / subs money that you seem to be suggesting.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
252
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:10:00 -
[261] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Let me quote myself in case you don't get the whole PLEX cycle. Quote: The person that buys the PLEX with cash gets exactly what they want for their money. They get ISK.  The person that buys the vanity item with and ISK purchased PLEX gets exactly what they want. The vanity item in question without spending their own cash to aquire it.  CCP gets exactly what they want. The get the income from the original PLEX purchase.. Except CCP already got their income from the person buying PLEX in point 1. What is the point of NeX store again? Because in your example the only thing NeX "achieves" is short-circuiting player industry and cheapening the experience of gaining new content. Player wanting the ship skin/piece of clothing/whatever and buying with isk rendered down from Plex has already paid CCP a microtransaction fee in essence - why shouldn't the isk be payed to a player who played the game a little to build/lp purchase/discover the item in question to enrich general gameplay as well?
Jade, we have already covered this repeatedly. I'm going to assume you didn't read large portions of the thread, which is fairly understandable.
For CCP to receive income from people buying PLEX to resell for ISK, it is beneficial to have as many reasons as possible for one player to buy PLEX from another with ISK.
The NeX provides another interface with the DUST econonmy, which we already know will be closely linked and be both AURUM and ISK based.
We also already know that due to player feed back CCP pulled back the release of the Ishukone Watch Scorpion until they could put in place the capability for the NeX store to either sell BPC's or to be able to accept player made goods (ship hulls, PI products, whatever) as part of the purchase price... thereby including player industry directly. For reference you can verify this by watching the interviews during the alliance tournament and the Dev Blogs concerning the delay of the Ishukone Watch Scorpion test release.
I am a very strong advocate for the current clothing items available to be put on this same system once it is in place.
These things have been pointed out before. I will assume you have forgotten this and are not simply ignoring them as they refute the points you are trying to make. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1374
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:17:00 -
[262] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:The NeX provides another interface with the DUST econonmy, which we already know will be closely linked and be both AURUM and ISK based. No, it doesn't. AUR does, and there in no real need for the NeX just because they want AUR. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
819
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:36:00 -
[263] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Let me quote myself in case you don't get the whole PLEX cycle. Quote: The person that buys the PLEX with cash gets exactly what they want for their money. They get ISK.  The person that buys the vanity item with and ISK purchased PLEX gets exactly what they want. The vanity item in question without spending their own cash to aquire it.  CCP gets exactly what they want. The get the income from the original PLEX purchase.. Except CCP already got their income from the person buying PLEX in point 1. What is the point of NeX store again? Because in your example the only thing NeX "achieves" is short-circuiting player industry and cheapening the experience of gaining new content. Player wanting the ship skin/piece of clothing/whatever and buying with isk rendered down from Plex has already paid CCP a microtransaction fee in essence - why shouldn't the isk be payed to a player who played the game a little to build/lp purchase/discover the item in question to enrich general gameplay as well? Jade, we have already covered this repeatedly. I'm going to assume you didn't read large portions of the thread, which is fairly understandable. For CCP to receive income from people buying PLEX to resell for ISK, it is beneficial to have as many reasons as possible for one player to buy PLEX from another with ISK. The NeX provides another interface with the DUST econonmy, which we already know will be closely linked and be both AURUM and ISK based. We also already know that due to player feed back CCP pulled back the release of the Ishukone Watch Scorpion until they could put in place the capability for the NeX store to either sell BPC's or to be able to accept player made goods (ship hulls, PI products, whatever) as part of the purchase price... thereby including player industry directly. For reference you can verify this by watching the interviews during the alliance tournament and the Dev Blogs concerning the delay of the Ishukone Watch Scorpion test release. I am a very strong advocate for the current clothing items available to be put on this same system once it is in place. These things have been pointed out before. I will assume you have forgotten this and are not simply ignoring them as they refute the points you are trying to make.
Problem is you didn't actually answer my question. Quoting material from six month old dev blogs (pre NeXCarna rage and layoffs and change of company direction) is not convincing. NeX is a failed experiement at best.
What is the point of it?
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:44:00 -
[264] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:The NeX provides another interface with the DUST econonmy, which we already know will be closely linked and be both AURUM and ISK based. No, it doesn't. AUR does, and there in no real need for the NeX just because they want AUR.
It's a bit difficult for AUR to be a common link between the two games if AUR is unknown in EVE.
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Lexmana
Imperial Stout
53
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:47:00 -
[265] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote: NeX is a failed experiement at best.
What is the point of it?
It might be a failed experiment and we don't like it but there is little doubt in my mind that they are gonna sell the ship-skins via NeX and probably also make them indestructible. CSM has already approved of this with the condition that player built ships are part of the transaction and since it is classified as vanity I don't see a new uprising coming either. It is a slippery slope but we are already on it and CCP really wants to make good use of their new PLEX sink. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1377
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:51:00 -
[266] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:It's a bit difficult for AUR to be a common link between the two games if AUR is unknown in EVE. It's not unknown; it is right there in our wallets. The question is what its supposed use is.
It could simply be a means to pay your dustbunnies or to shop around on the Dust market, without no connection to EVE content. Want to protect your PI? Cough up the AUR and send it over, and that is where it gets its use in EVE. The NeX is not needed to make the link happen.
Lexmana wrote:It is a slippery slope but we are already on it and CCP really wants to make good use of their new PLEX sink. Just because you're on a slippery slope does not mean you shouldn't try to get off it. If CCP want their PLEX sink, fine, but everyone can just drop the pretence that it in any way benefits the gameplay of EVE and that its content wouldn't be better off coming from a regular source. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
819
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:55:00 -
[267] - Quote
Lexmana wrote:Jade Constantine wrote: NeX is a failed experiement at best.
What is the point of it?
It might be a failed experiment and we don't like it but there is little doubt in my mind that they are gonna sell the ship-skins via NeX and probably also make them indestructible.
Personally I don't think they are that stupid. Having lost the number of subs they did this summer and having now asked for feedback and analysis of the NeX rollout for management review I honestly don't think CCP is going to be as foolish as some of the proNeX players are.
Quote: CSM has already approved of this with the condition that player built ships are part of the transaction and since it is classified as vanity I don't see a new uprising coming either. It is a slippery slope but we are already on it and CCP really wants to make good use of their new PLEX sink.
This CSM has been criticised as being fairly non-representative of the player base this time around. The blind-eye they turned to NeX is a problem with their credibility. End of the day if the difference between Eve with NeX and Eve without NeX is 50,000 subscriptions that alone will make a powerful argument for getting rid of the thing. You'd need to sell an awful lot of monocles and ship skins to add up to half a million dollars a month.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
819
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:57:00 -
[268] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Tippia wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:The NeX provides another interface with the DUST econonmy, which we already know will be closely linked and be both AURUM and ISK based. No, it doesn't. AUR does, and there in no real need for the NeX just because they want AUR. It's a bit difficult for AUR to be a common link between the two games if AUR is unknown in EVE.
AUR is not the "common link" its simply a transferable currency.
The "common link" is that battles in one game affect the other.
I don't believe AUR in Eve is actually required for Dust to be a success - thats just marketing-peon mumbo jumbo on the MT bandwagon.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:16:00 -
[269] - Quote
Trying to avoid pyramid quoting Jade.
Quote:Problem is you didn't actually answer my question. Quoting material from six month old dev blogs (pre NeXCarna rage and layoffs and change of company direction) is not convincing. NeX is a failed experiement at best.
What is the point of it?
You do have a point that their plans for the NeX store may have changed or at least been delayed, we have no more current information.
However, at least my opinion is backed up with fact. It was, and presumably still is (until we hear otherwise) the next level of capability in the NeX store. That being to direclty include player industry.
This directly addresses perhaps the single largest argument against the inclusion of the NeX store.
I have little doubt there were many reasons for the development of the NeX store (many of them being very small things that have been glossed over in most of these debates). Obviously a large number of those reasons are internal to CCP and center around increasing their revenue without an increase in their monthly subscription fee.
If you fee that is an unworthy goal, or somehow dishonest, we regretably won't ever see eye to eye on this.
Reasons that immediately come to mind, and are undoubtably not a complete list:
1: Another intersection point between the EVE and the DUST economy. I know you have issues with this, but due to the free to play nature of DUST combinded with the fact that there will be cross over industry and economic factors between the two games (which is brilliant in my opinion) a higher degree of granularity is obviously needed.
2: A direct and more or less self contained interface to faciliate PLEX based transactions. Anything that makes it easier and less convoluted to purchase PLEX (with ISK or CASH) and spend said PLEX is undoubtedly viewed as a plus by CCP. As long as it doesn't detract from the current EVE economy, I have no issue with this... and again it's been clearly stated that the final form of the NeX is intended to include player based industry in a positive way.
My only complaints are:
It is that it is unclear as to whether the inclusion of player made items in the purchase price (or alternatively the sale of BPC's) will also end up being extended to clothing items. I'm fairly firmly commited to the concept of them following this same format.
All items sold through the NeX should be destructable (ship skins likely will be, but clothing should be as well), and priced accordingly.
So yes, it's not an ideal system yet. However I have no objection to the concept itself. I know this will be an unpopular stance, but I've never been one to let that influence stating my point of view.
I refuse to confuse the NeX store with Pay to Win or prejudice myself against it based on a fallacy.
I refuse to take the stance that a mechanic that is good for CCP's bottom line is automatically bad for the player base. If handled correctly, just the opposite is true.
I refuse to believe that CCP is unaware that it is in their best interest to have the NeX store closely tied to player industry.
So there you have it, hopefully not presented in a way that makes it seem like I refuse to acknowledge or deeply consider your point of view.
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Hallorin
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:16:00 -
[270] - Quote
Azahni Vah'nos wrote: You do know that CCP was funding the development of 3 games off the back of the EVE subscribers/PLEX'ers don't you?
Your theories fall completely flat when put in context of what has been happening over the life of EVE.
Absolutely right. Well, about CCP possibly funding other games with our subs and possibly using incarna or NeX as a way to develop dust resources.
This is why I keep reiterating that I'm not sure the NeX store has actually been working this way. It's also why I was upset like many others after incarna, shot statues like everyone else, unsubbed, and am now posting on a new main less than a month old.
Yours is the argument that people should be making against me.
That said, All my 'theories' are really just a response to the ridiculous claims made in this, and the other closed thread that NeX is somehow automatically or necessarily bad or that it amounts to double charging in every case.
As I've tried to make clear, I think the expression 'double charging' is pretty silly, given the optional nature of the nex and I don't think I can make it clearer than with my example of reducing monthly subs for eliminating content.
Though I think we probably agree and that you get that, since, as I say, you are making a good argument here which (as I see it) goes more like:
Yeah fine, NeX is not automatically bad - but in fact it IS bad, and in fact we WERE charged in order pay for different games.
I guess the reason I keep trying to say NeX could be good is because I have hopes for the future. I'd honestly pay double or triple my sub right now if it mean eve introducing a ton of new content they'd otherwise never get around to. But, obviously, CCP would die if they ever increased monthly subs. So the NeX creates the means to do so without increasing subs.
I'm just not honestly sure that we'd have ever seen some of this (new avatars, ship skins) if the design hadn't been predicated on the virtual sales model. It's for this reason that I don't think it's double charging and that I'm happy to pay a reasonable amount for this stuff.
Though again, CCP will easily put me on the other side of the fence here if they charge a stupid amount.
And actually, now that I am talking about this again, I don't expect we'll see any ship skins in NeX this winter. Well maybe a couple just to test. But a fully fledged ship customization will not happen till all are V3'ed and that won't be till summer... at least |
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:30:00 -
[271] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:It's a bit difficult for AUR to be a common link between the two games if AUR is unknown in EVE. It's not unknown; it is right there in our wallets. The question is what its supposed use is. It could simply be a means to pay your dustbunnies or to shop around on the Dust market, without no connection to EVE content. Want to protect your PI? Cough up the AUR and send it over, and that is where it gets its use in EVE. The NeX is not needed to make the link happen. Lexmana wrote:It is a slippery slope but we are already on it and CCP really wants to make good use of their new PLEX sink. Just because you're on a slippery slope does not mean you shouldn't try to get off it. If CCP want their PLEX sink, fine, but everyone can just drop the pretence that it in any way benefits the gameplay of EVE and that its content wouldn't be better off coming from a regular source.
Introducing AUR to the EVE environment simply as a means to purchase DUST mercs, while entirely possible, would be extremely inefficient and limited when CCP can benefit financially from it's inclusion on other levels of the eve economy.
It would be illogical for them not to design it with as many uses a is practical, with the underlying restriction of not undermining the EVE economy in any significant way.
From what we have been told so far (unless those plans have changed) that is exactly what their intention was. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1381
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:58:00 -
[272] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Introducing AUR to the EVE environment simply as a means to purchase DUST mercs, while entirely possible, would be extremely inefficient and limited when CCP can benefit financially from it's inclusion on other levels of the eve economy.
But that is also the whole point: EVE has zero need for the NeX, and only the most tenuous of needs for AUR. The need lies with CCP, not with the game GÇö in fact, as shown, both are actually rather harmful to the addition of EVE content since it steals away gameplay components from the game. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
253
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:10:00 -
[273] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Introducing AUR to the EVE environment simply as a means to purchase DUST mercs, while entirely possible, would be extremely inefficient and limited when CCP can benefit financially from it's inclusion on other levels of the eve economy.
But that is also the whole point: EVE has zero need for the NeX, and only the most tenuous of needs for AUR. The need lies with CCP, not with the game GÇö in fact, as shown, both are actually rather harmful to the addition of EVE content since it steals away gameplay components from the game.
CCP is the game. If CCP suffers financially, EVE suffers as well.
EVE has zero need for the NeX and AUR as a stand alone product, but it is not going to be a stand alone product. You know this.
The only content that the NeX has "stolen away" is content that would not exist without it's inclusion to begin with. The plan for future content beyond clothing items (and hopefully they are paying attention when we say we would like clothing items to have more direct connection with current industry) has been clearly stated to directly involve current industry.
Much respect Tip, but you would be better served to recognize that latter point rather than continue to simply ignore it. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1383
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:19:00 -
[274] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: EVE has zero need for the NeX and AUR as a stand alone product, but it is not going to be a stand alone product. You know this.
It has no need for them as a combo-product either. Both can be served by existing means and mechanics.
Quote: The only content that the NeX has "stolen away" is content that would not exist without it's inclusion to begin with.
No, there is nothing in the NeX that requires the presence of the NeX, and developing and including it is not contingent of the existence of the NeX. Everything can be done at least as well GÇö and probably far better GÇö without the NeX pre-obsoleting (since you dislike the more accurate GÇ£steal away") content. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Zowie Powers
Hole in the wall
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:30:00 -
[275] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:SELECTED Off topic posts removed. Please stay on topic, thank you.
You're such a company guy you make me puke. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
820
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 18:02:00 -
[276] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: However, at least my opinion is backed up with fact. It was, and presumably still is (until we hear otherwise) the next level of capability in the NeX store. That being to direclty include player industry. This directly addresses perhaps the single largest argument against the inclusion of the NeX store.
I don't buy it. Right at the moment I suspect the NeX store is looking to CCP like a landmine in the office. Nobody wants to go near it in case it goes off - nobody really knows how to defuse or remove it. Right now they are trying to pretend it doesn't exist. It is such a horrible twisting corruption of Eve's lore, background, industrial basis and anything else you can think of that I strongly believe the majority of developers just wish it would go away and never return.
Quote:I have little doubt there were many reasons for the development of the NeX store (many of them being very small things that have been glossed over in most of these debates). Obviously a large number of those reasons are internal to CCP and center around increasing their revenue without an increase in their monthly subscription fee. If you fee that is an unworthy goal, or somehow dishonest, we regretably won't ever see eye to eye on this.
Well it was almost certainly development pushed by "industry experts" they hired that told the senior management that the subscription model "was dead" and MT were everything. I think the reality that without subscriptions CCP was actually "dead" (with the wake up call this summer) has changed everything.
To your detailed "reasons":
1. I'm sure they were telling themselves it was a test of MT commerce. This far more likely than any actual concrete planned intersection.
2. Well, that final form will likely never arrive - I take Hilmar at his word when he says NeX/Carna is on the backburner. So we're left with the abortive experiment and a horrible embarrassment in the NeX store.
I can agree with you on principle that all items in Eve should be destructable but we'll obviously continue to differ on whether its appropriate for anything to be sold through NeX.
On the pay to win argument - I see NeX as the thin end of the wedge that will inevitably lead to a pay-to-win / free-to-play Eve. The large scale deployment of NeX would certainly drive players away. I myself will likely quit the game in the medium term if NeX is expanded and that has a knock on effect on those players I play the game with. I'm by no means in a tiny minority there. A game like Eve flourishes when corp and alliance leaders have faith in the game and are encouraged to sell the enjoyment of playing to others. But for me there is no enjoyment to be had within a hybrid MT+Subscription model. Its just wrong and it feels like daylight robbery. So NeX expansion will lead (i think) to falling subs that bring financial pressure, that leads to more MT and more falling subs. The place this ends is CCP laying off 80% of its staff not 20% and putting Eve into FTW maintenance mode while making the remaining player base pay $ for core gamplay.
This isn't really unrealistic doomsaying - its what happens to subscription games that lose their subscribers and go the MT route.
I think arguments about CCP's financial "bottom line" regarding NeX are automatically void in the light of the $500,000 per month losses causes this summer by the NeXCarna fiasco. Everything has changed since the scaling down of WoD/Incarna and refocus on core Eve Online for the company. While developing and running Eve as a primary concern CCP doesn't have a need for additional revenue beyond the natural expansion of subscriptions as they improve the game and players proselytize to other potential players.
Sure things that improve profits for CCP are not *automatically* bad for the players. But thats a hellova long way from saying that schemes to improve profits are never bad. And some schemes to improve profits achieve exactly the opposite. As seen last summer.
Quote:I refuse to believe that CCP is unaware that it is in their best interest to have the NeX store closely tied to player industry. So there you have it, hopefully not presented in a way that makes it seem like I refuse to acknowledge or deeply consider your point of view.
I honestly believe that CCP senior management were gulled by the "industry professionals" they hired who told them they could extract a large additional profit by making Incarna a MT vanity display cabinet. The outcome of being hoodwinked in that way has been a significant drop in subscription income coupled with painful personnel cuts. Now CCP have realized that this MT business can be dangerous to their survival as a company and next time they want to improve profits the "hey lets improve the game and maybe our subs will increase" argument will find more traction in the boardroom.
Sometimes people are just bad at their job and the people CCP hired to advise them on MT the last couple of years were utterly horrible at theirs.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
924
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 18:37:00 -
[277] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote: I honestly believe that CCP senior management were gulled by the "industry professionals" they hired who told them they could extract a large additional profit by making Incarna a MT vanity display cabinet. The outcome of being hoodwinked in that way has been a significant drop in subscription income coupled with painful personnel cuts. Now CCP have realized that this MT business can be dangerous to their survival as a company and next time they want to improve profits the "hey lets improve the game and maybe our subs will increase" argument will find more traction in the boardroom.
I want to believe this is true but since they haven't announced the end of the NeX even though they must know the amount of goodwill it would generate leads me to think otherwise. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
821
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 19:02:00 -
[278] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Jade Constantine wrote: I honestly believe that CCP senior management were gulled by the "industry professionals" they hired who told them they could extract a large additional profit by making Incarna a MT vanity display cabinet. The outcome of being hoodwinked in that way has been a significant drop in subscription income coupled with painful personnel cuts. Now CCP have realized that this MT business can be dangerous to their survival as a company and next time they want to improve profits the "hey lets improve the game and maybe our subs will increase" argument will find more traction in the boardroom.
I want to believe this is true but since they haven't announced the end of the NeX even though they must know the amount of goodwill it would generate leads me to think otherwise.
Well we have to hope. I'm just telling myself they are so terrified about the NeX landmine that they are afraid to put its name in a devblog at the moment even to announce its elimination.
But I guess its why its important for decent players to keep arguing the case against NeX on these forums just incase CCP monocle and CCP thousand dollar jeans are printing out posts to support a return to NeX corruption in the future.
Eve eh? Its the only game in the world where we have to fight forum wars to ensure the company doesn't :accidently: decapitate itself.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Lexmana
Imperial Stout
53
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 19:41:00 -
[279] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Personally I don't think they are that stupid. Having lost the number of subs they did this summer and having now asked for feedback and analysis of the NeX rollout for management review I honestly don't think CCP is going to be as foolish as some of the proNeX players are.
I don't like it more than you do but this is how i think it will play out. They will release the winter expansion with lots of goodies. There will be new ships, new hybrids, new nebulae, nerfed supers, TiDi, maybe tweaked FW and more. And there will be new skins at NeX. Players will be happy and busy trying out all the new and old tweaked content. Any concerns raised about NeX will be lost in between the discussions about ... well ... everything else and also easily dismissed since it is only vanity and even approved by the CSM. There will be no uprising. No threadnought. And CCP have finally learned how to introduce MT to EVE. |

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 20:06:00 -
[280] - Quote
If you persist in hating on bitter vets and love CCP's new direction (which is entirely due to the actions of bitter vets) you are:
An Idiot.
...
Now that that's cleared up, as to ship skins. They, like all vanity items, should be buyable for ISK from NPC sell orders. EVE desperately needs more ISK sinks and this is a perfect one.
Aurum is garbage and should be removed from the game. Until CCP does that, they are just talking the talk. |
|

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
178
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 20:10:00 -
[281] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Ships skins may be coming this winter, if the recent hints are anything to go by. The possibility that they'll be sold on the NeX store is very high
I don't know what you're smoking or drinking but you should definitively do something about it 
|

Raven Ether
Republic University Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 20:45:00 -
[282] - Quote
So new art is just vanity and just ok to throw it in the cash bandwagon?
By the same logic, might as well release blank white ships without textures, them being sold seperately.
It's just vanity right? Doesn't affect the game experience.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
256
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 21:36:00 -
[283] - Quote
Raven Ether wrote:So new art is just vanity and just ok to throw it in the cash bandwagon?
By the same logic, might as well release blank white ships without textures, them being sold seperately.
It's just vanity right? Doesn't affect the game experience.
I suppose... if you are being stupidly obtuse and deliberately trying to put yourself out of business. 
Fortunately CCP doesn't have the same difficulty you do in knowing the difference between a new core asset and optional cosmetic changes to existing content.
Jade:
Quote:I can agree with you on principle that all items in Eve should be destructable but we'll obviously continue to differ on whether its appropriate for anything to be sold through NeX.
Fair enough. Perhaps on the next hot topic we won't be on opposite sides of the fence.  To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
127
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 13:08:00 -
[284] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:You do know that the NeX store items were farmed out to another company right?  Allegedly so. I personally have my doubts. What I will say is that when I served as CSM chairman I met at least one graphic designer on the CCP payroll who was employed purely to design space fashions. I have no idea if the chap is still employed by CCP or if he was involved in the NeX clothing - but it does make me doubt the full separation of NeX development effort / subs money that you seem to be suggesting. The modeling and texturing work for the clothing is done in China (maybe even at CCP in Shanghai), so some very cheap labour at a guess. With the clothes themselves designed by Fiona Cribben, a fashion designer. Nex (Cash Shop)-á/ Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future. |

Raven Ether
Republic University Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 13:46:00 -
[285] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:Ship skin = Vanity. I have no issue at all with it being on the Nex market. If your ship is destroyed however, you need to buy a new skin. Thats my view.
With this "Ship skin= vanity therefore I don't care" mentality, the next thing we know is that we will be paying extra to have new cyno effects, new warp effects, new textures etc etc
Anyway, since CCP has already gone through with it, skins can be a solution to ****** camo and lame textures that are dark as **** |

Jonathan Malcom
Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 13:50:00 -
[286] - Quote
Denidil wrote:Fionaa wrote:
Do you feel the new nebulae-¦s should be NeX too ? After all its just skins, it wont effect gameplay.
no, they shouldn't - they're a core part of the game they also don't affect gameplay. just because something doesn't affect gameplay doesn't mean it should be in NeX, but something in NeX that doesn't affect gameplay is fine. now if only they sold Logic implants in the nex, i would recommend you buy one - because your wetware sucks at it.
I've never really understood this school of thought. You're essentially saying, "I pay a regular subscription for this game just like everyone else, but I think I should be nickle-and-dimed for content that I'm already paying to access."
And that's completely ignoring the gameplay possibilities that putting this stuff I'm the regular production economy would create.
|

Gerald Taric
F-H Schwerindustrie und Sicherheit KRAUTZ-FEDERATION
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 13:59:00 -
[287] - Quote
mechtech wrote:The reason I don't like the NeX store is that it doesn't add any gameplay to Eve. Therefore no one is forced to use it - because it adds nothing to gameplay - right? 
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: [one page] |