| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kayosoni
   |
Posted - 2006.04.09 02:57:00 -
[1]
CLEARLY, CLEARLY.
Unnerf the nighthawk
-----------------------------------
btw, threatening to close 1 account really hurt my eyes. - xaioguai |
Mudkest
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 03:05:00 -
[2]
0.2 for a precision missile 
still beats the wrecking hits for 0 points of damage I come acros now and then though 
|
Spartan III
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 03:15:00 -
[3]
yep unerf it please, or nerf the crow... Yeah, nerf the crow, that will make me happy!
---
Wolven Elite Guard - Currently recruiting |
Blind Man
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 03:23:00 -
[4]
LOL
|
Leno
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 03:36:00 -
[5]
glad i got rid of that crappy bpo 
---------------
RIP - Smoske, My Friend
|
Espen
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 03:38:00 -
[6]
lewl, nerf the nighthawk tbfh.
|
Hllaxiu
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 04:05:00 -
[7]
 Originally by: Kayosoni
CLEARLY, CLEARLY.
Unnerf the nighthawk
Don't feel bad, I can't hit bob crows either.
In all seriousness: Caldari CCs need a rethink...
---
Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Emerson |
Central Scrutinizer
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 04:40:00 -
[8]
Dunno if this is a serious post, so I'll answer this assuming it is.
I'm betting that crow was either going full speed, or was going full speed and you hit him just as MWD turned off.
Same thing happens with all missiles.
As soon as he started orbiting you within disruptor range he'd pop in two (or 1.5) volleys.
|
Corn Meal
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 06:29:00 -
[9]
unnerf pls......
nighthawk is worthless
|
Rexthor Hammerfists
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 06:31:00 -
[10]
yep, needs a unnerf.
or better a complete rethink, or however u say it..
-
Purple Conquered The World, We the Universe.
|
|
|
Jim McGregor
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 08:02:00 -
[11]
Useless post ftw.
---
"Automatic override. Manual control overridden by autopilot. Please wait for operation to complete. You can override the automatic autopilot override in 28 seconds. Then you can make it wait" |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 09:07:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Kayosoni
CLEARLY, CLEARLY.
Unnerf the nighthawk
What's happened there is quite clear. He's just turned off his MWD, so his sig radius is tiny...but he's still traveling at 4km/s for a few seconds.
WTS Sack of limes to Kayo.
"The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer |
Deva Blackfire
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 09:40:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Deva Blackfire on 09/04/2006 09:40:50
One question:
Do you think you are supposed to own any inty in one-two salvos just when you equip precissions?
|
Ryysa
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 10:58:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Deva Blackfire
One question:
Do you think you are supposed to own any inty in one-two salvos just when you equip precissions?
yes.
All about target jamming |
Kyoko Sakoda
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 11:04:00 -
[15]
Well, Nighthawk should be unnerfed, yes. But frigate killer it should not be. 
Learn what it means to be Caldari - www.omertasyndicate.com |
Grimpak
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 11:25:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Ryysa
Originally by: Deva Blackfire
One question:
Do you think you are supposed to own any inty in one-two salvos just when you equip precissions?
yes.
no.
----------------
Originally by: Abdalion
Shoot him ingame if you don't like this person. If you do like him, go mine veldspar with him.
|
Ryysa
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 11:34:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Grimpak
Originally by: Ryysa
Originally by: Deva Blackfire
One question:
Do you think you are supposed to own any inty in one-two salvos just when you equip precissions?
yes.
no.
yes. :)
All about target jamming |
Copine Callmeknau
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 11:35:00 -
[18]
Welcome to explosion velocity.
-------
With five million sheep in this army
I seem to be the only one fit to command
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 11:38:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Ryysa
Originally by: Grimpak
Originally by: Ryysa
Originally by: Deva Blackfire
One question:
Do you think you are supposed to own any inty in one-two salvos just when you equip precissions?
yes.
no.
yes. :)
right, Absolution can 1 volley a crow going 8km/s?
right, Astarte can 1 volley a crow going 8km/s?
right, Sleipnir can 1 volley a crow going 8km/s?
NO!
Ok, maybe it needs better bonuses but stop dreaming.
Originally by: KilROCK
I make sigs, evemail me if interested.
|
Jim McGregor
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 11:38:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Ryysa
Originally by: Grimpak
Originally by: Ryysa
Originally by: Deva Blackfire
One question:
Do you think you are supposed to own any inty in one-two salvos just when you equip precissions?
yes.
no.
yes. :)
Maybe you guys should think about if you want small ships to have a role in this game or not.
---
"Automatic override. Manual control overridden by autopilot. Please wait for operation to complete. You can override the automatic autopilot override in 28 seconds. Then you can make it wait" |
|
|
j0sephine
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 11:49:00 -
[21]
Edited by: j0sephine on 09/04/2006 11:49:59
"One question:
Do you think you are supposed to own any inty in one-two salvos just when you equip precissions?"
I think the point is, if the highly specialized ship equipped with precision missiles _and_ set of precision-related boosts still sucks at taking out small ships ... then this whole "but she can hit small targets!11!one" specialization that is supposed to balance out extremely limited overall damage output in comparison to other field commands... is questionable, at best.
|
Exogene
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 11:56:00 -
[22]
I am using pulses and have a similar problem. At optimal range and appropriate t-velocity range, while hitting targets the turrets suddenly stop hitting all and keep getting misses. In this state i have also tried 0 t-velocity + optimal range still no hits. Turning AB on and off also seems to start this problem sometimes. It usually goes away within 30sec - 5 mins or i have to log off. Please fix this crap, i am fighting NPC, imagine i get this bug during a real fight...
|
Denrace
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 13:41:00 -
[23]
Nighthawk sucks.
Boost it.
________________________________________
|
Deva Blackfire
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 15:02:00 -
[24]
Quote:
I think the point is, if the highly specialized ship equipped with precision missiles _and_ set of precision-related boosts still sucks at taking out small ships ... then this whole "but she can hit small targets!11!one" specialization that is supposed to balance out extremely limited overall damage output in comparison to other field commands... is questionable, at best.
Ok - if you give it an ability to instapwn inties, then:
what kind of defence do you propose for said inties if they wish to tackle you or even come closer than 50km's?
(not talking about defenders - not every inty can fit them).
|
Rawthorm
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 15:28:00 -
[25]
Edited by: Rawthorm on 09/04/2006 15:32:27
Originally by: Deva Blackfire
Quote:
I think the point is, if the highly specialized ship equipped with precision missiles _and_ set of precision-related boosts still sucks at taking out small ships ... then this whole "but she can hit small targets!11!one" specialization that is supposed to balance out extremely limited overall damage output in comparison to other field commands... is questionable, at best.
Ok - if you give it an ability to instapwn inties, then:
what kind of defence do you propose for said inties if they wish to tackle you or even come closer than 50km's?
(not talking about defenders - not every inty can fit them).
None. Intys should not be able to tackle every ship in game with total impunity.
Besides the DPS of caldari has always stunk (and when it dont it because the player has been forces to use multipul BCU's just to keep up) In general missile versitility was the only pro to using missiles and if missiles get any crappier then I think its about time missiles got a minor damage increase.
Short version = Let the Tech 2 missile boat do what they are are by their stats MENT to do. Deal with smaller craft rather than craft of their own classes.
|
Malthros Zenobia
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 15:47:00 -
[26]
FFS, you're not flying a combat ship, you're flying a gang-bonus-***** ship.
Originally by: Dark Shikari
Istvaan Shogaatsu's ego, when combined with a veldspar asteroid, would create 500 titans. Too bad he's never mined.
RAWR!11 Sig Hijack!11 - Imaran |
Harry Voyager
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 16:08:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Malthros Zenobia
FFS, you're not flying a combat ship, you're flying a gang-bonus-***** ship.
Quote:
Field command ships are geared more towards out-and-out combat than their fleet command counterparts, though both ships can hold their own in battle.
Not a combat ship
|
Kayosoni
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 17:09:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Maya Rkell
Originally by: Kayosoni
CLEARLY, CLEARLY.
Unnerf the nighthawk
What's happened there is quite clear. He's just turned off his MWD, so his sig radius is tiny...but he's still traveling at 4km/s for a few seconds.
WTS Sack of limes to Kayo.
Incorrect. He was actually orbitting me faster than my misiles travelled after that ONE hit. Thanks for no velocity bonus.
-----------------------------------
btw, threatening to close 1 account really hurt my eyes. - xaioguai |
Wartogg
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 17:40:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Meeko Gloom
Originally by: Ryysa
Originally by: Grimpak
Originally by: Ryysa
Originally by: Deva Blackfire
One question:
Do you think you are supposed to own any inty in one-two salvos just when you equip precissions?
yes.
no.
yes. :)
no
yes
|
Jim Raynor
|
Posted - 2006.04.09 17:42:00 -
[30]
why not just give the nighthawk a launcher rate of fire bonus instead of one of the useless precision/target nav prediction bonuses and call it a day?
it'd be on par with the other command bcruisers dps wise and be a perfectly good and worthwhile ship to train for
------
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |