Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Petya Gladiator
Enlightened Industries Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 19:12:00 -
[121] - Quote
Gorski stream is always entertaining, he comes up with some great fits. Sometime goes afk on stream without docking. But always fun to watch... |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1090
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 00:12:00 -
[122] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post and those quoting it. Please keep it civil people!
The Rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
JAF Anders
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
186
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 00:45:00 -
[123] - Quote
I think there is a better solution to warfare link timers than what's been discussed so far. The idea that booster characters should be shot and unable to dock for the duration of the boost is rather lopsided, as it completely eliminates the viability of links in the relatively target-starved systems of high-security space. Incursion groups rely heavily on the existence and availability of warfare links at no detriment to other players. Adding a weapons timer and a suspect timer to warfare links would also push the Orca completely out of an intended role.
The flag-everything solution only works for low-sec. Even though I like low-sec, I don't want to see solutions implemented that only help us. Your thoughts? QCATS is Recruiting: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146180 |
Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
271
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 13:27:00 -
[124] - Quote
Gorski,
As someone who likes to solo PVP and who wants to get better at it (lol,) I'm very happy to see a candidate who represents this playstyle.
That said, my main issue this year is this: Do you believe the TOS and EULA extend outside of the game and cover things said and done in a private environment?
Thanks for you answer, and Bring Solo Back!
Either the rules apply to everyone, or they don't justly apply to anyone.
|
Elmnt80
Life. Universe. Everything. Clockwork Pineapple
14
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 02:32:00 -
[125] - Quote
Hello.
Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper? |
Gorski Car
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
262
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 08:42:00 -
[126] - Quote
JAF Anders wrote:I think there is a better solution to warfare link timers than what's been discussed so far. The idea that booster characters should be shot and unable to dock for the duration of the boost is rather lopsided, as it completely eliminates the viability of links in the relatively target-starved systems of high-security space. Incursion groups rely heavily on the existence and availability of warfare links at no detriment to other players. Adding a weapons timer and a suspect timer to warfare links would also push the Orca completely out of an intended role.
The flag-everything solution only works for low-sec. Even though I like low-sec, I don't want to see solutions implemented that only help us. Your thoughts?
I don't think that would be a problem. I think the problem is that incursion groups have been so heavily using links and flying **** like 1 invul tank vindicators that they have been dependant on links. They even think that links are a necessity to even do incursion sites. When incursions first came out me and my corp back then did then in lowsec with drakes, tengus and tornadoes with logi support. It was totally doable and I am confident that incursion groups are good enough to realize that they might want to swap out that sebo for another invul. And for the daring there is always a safespot + eccm fitted link alt. This might even put contesting on another level :).
You have to agree that highsec incursions have way to high income for the risk in doing them. I see no problem in this cutting down the 150m/h+ or so that hq sites can give.
I don't think the orca should be included in these changes just as it wasn't included when pos linking was removed. #GORSKI4CSM https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4265138#post4265138
|
Gorski Car
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
262
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 09:03:00 -
[127] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Gorski, As someone who likes to solo PVP and who wants to get better at it (lol,) I'm very happy to see a candidate who represents this playstyle. That said, my main issue this year is this: Do you believe the TOS and EULA extend outside of the game and cover things said and done in a private environment? Thanks for you answer, and Bring Solo Back!
I assumed that we eve players were mature enough to keep **** within game and don't go trying to make people break down. Sure I enjoy the occasional singing ransom but man have some decency in your body and let them go if they do that. I do not in anyway support what Erotica 1 did and I would never continue that far with harassing other players.
With that said I think that what Ripard teg did is pretty bad. He is a CSM member and I am 100% sure he has private ways to contact ccp members. Instead he posted a public blog for everyone to see forcing CCPs hand and make them do stuff that he wants or risk having bad press.
People seem to overreact and think that banning Erotica1 for stuff outside the game will make people start faking teamspeak recordings and getting loads of people banned. CCP can ban anyone for any reason at all and there is nothing you can do about that.
CCP pretty much has to choose between writing up super strict guidelines of what you can and can not do like some other MMOs or Continue with their "our userbase are mature enough to understand when you are going over the line".
I really think that the second choice is the best.
All in all I think that people need to calm down and be better persons outside the game. There is really no way for ccp to 100% confirm that harassment has continued outside the game but I feel like nothing of value was lost when erotica 1 was banned. People need to grow up.
Elmnt80 wrote:Hello.
Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper?
Just be patient I am sure ccp will implement these soon enough. It seems only fair. #GORSKI4CSM https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4265138#post4265138
|
Abla Tive
Serpent.Sisters.of.Eve
43
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 15:12:00 -
[128] - Quote
Question about mining activity to all candidates |
Doctorkaba
Common Sense Ltd Nulli Secunda
45
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 18:56:00 -
[129] - Quote
Sorry for any repeated questions, tried my best to read all your post and the replies.
How do you feel the Clone Soldiers have helped LS income? Do you think they should have an increased spawn or fine as is?
You suggest more plexes, how do you want these new ones to spawn. As in, what type of spawn rate are you looking at? Afaik and have been told, Large plexes have lower spawn rates (and are plexed really quickly), do you want higher spawn rates for larger plexes?
You mention buffing LS missions, what about the other types of income? Marketing (unless you are scouted in or have webbing alts) are favored for the people with JFs, mining is... well mining, ratting is mainly profitable ny hunting clone soldiers or faction spawns, and Incursions seem hard to do in any kind of safety (i have never done, just hunted people doing them). Anomaly ratting (what im doing for isk atm up in nulli space) doesn't seem as profitable (read at all profitable) in LS.
Do we know when voting starts for CSM? Want some pvp help? Like to fly small and fast frigates? Then join the in game channel Tenori_Tigers! |
Michael Oskold
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 18:53:00 -
[130] - Quote
will vote for you, friend.
:popcorn: |
|
Janden Rynd
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:11:00 -
[131] - Quote
I largely appreciate your perspective and views, and you've already earned a high position on my ballot.
However, one of your statements puzzled me:
Gorski Car wrote:I believe unbonused ewar might be a bit too strong as tracking disruptors have become a really strong module after the multiple unneeded missile nerfs. One of the problems eve currently have is that there are no real good force multipliers that come with any risk at all. sitting 100km away from the battle in a 10mn keres damping stuff isn't very dangerous. Same with having a link damnation on station. Huge force multipliers with no risk at all.
If the tracking disruptors are strong as a result of "unneeded missile nerfs," wouldn't the best response be to fix missiles rather than nerfing tracking disruptors? To reduce ewar because of problems with a weapon system seems a bit like treating a symptom rather than the disease itself. Would you be open to advocating for fixes/improvements to missiles as a whole? |
Longdrinks
The Greater Goon Clockwork Pineapple
26
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:13:00 -
[132] - Quote
do u think solo is dead!?!?!??!?! |
Aram Kachaturian
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
55
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 21:30:00 -
[133] - Quote
Longdrinks wrote:do u think solo is dead!?!?!??!?!
You are still alive brother = Aram For CSM9 = http://i.imgur.com/6V7LO6W.jpg = Best Killboard = http://kb.pasta.gg/ |
Firefox4312 Yatolila
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
45
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 12:54:00 -
[134] - Quote
Longdrinks wrote:do u think solo is dead!?!?!??!?!
Obviously |
Nevil Kincade
VS-PREDATORS SCUM.
1
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 15:30:00 -
[135] - Quote
Good Luck with your campaign ! |
Gorski Car
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
268
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 22:52:00 -
[136] - Quote
Doctorkaba wrote:Sorry for any repeated questions, tried my best to read all your post and the replies.
How do you feel the Clone Soldiers have helped LS income? Do you think they should have an increased spawn or fine as is?
You suggest more plexes, how do you want these new ones to spawn. As in, what type of spawn rate are you looking at? Afaik and have been told, Large plexes have lower spawn rates (and are plexed really quickly), do you want higher spawn rates for larger plexes?
You mention buffing LS missions, what about the other types of income? Marketing (unless you are scouted in or have webbing alts) are favored for the people with JFs, mining is... well mining, ratting is mainly profitable ny hunting clone soldiers or faction spawns, and Incursions seem hard to do in any kind of safety (i have never done, just hunted people doing them). Anomaly ratting (what im doing for isk atm up in nulli space) doesn't seem as profitable (read at all profitable) in LS.
Do we know when voting starts for CSM?
I love the security tags and I think ccp has a pretty good drop rate at the moment. You cant increase it by much because the price of the tags would be way lower (not that I mind as a frequent user of them :)). I think fw needs a higher spawnrate on larger plexes so every system isn't just 4 novices and a small.
On other types of lowsec income: Marketing is viable with a blockade runner as well or if you are just going 1jump into lowsec you just need a scout. Incursions are not really hard to do and I have done loads of them both in lowsec and in deep 0.0 as a neutral/hostile. The thing is that the increased payout means that you will get a competetive isk/h even with less pimped ships. I'd love if ccp made lowsec incursions like the prenerf ones where you could blitz them but that might be a bit to much.
Running anoms in lowsec is very profitable and there are so many pirates who are able to pvp from just running 6/10s that pop up in their pvp mach/tengu.
Voting for CSM has been up for a while and everyone should go vote (for me) #GORSKI4CSM https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4265138#post4265138
|
Gorski Car
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
268
|
Posted - 2014.04.16 22:55:00 -
[137] - Quote
Janden Rynd wrote:I largely appreciate your perspective and views, and you've already earned a high position on my ballot. However, one of your statements puzzled me: Gorski Car wrote:I believe unbonused ewar might be a bit too strong as tracking disruptors have become a really strong module after the multiple unneeded missile nerfs. One of the problems eve currently have is that there are no real good force multipliers that come with any risk at all. sitting 100km away from the battle in a 10mn keres damping stuff isn't very dangerous. Same with having a link damnation on station. Huge force multipliers with no risk at all.
If the tracking disruptors are strong as a result of "unneeded missile nerfs," wouldn't the best response be to fix missiles rather than nerfing tracking disruptors? To reduce ewar because of problems with a weapon system seems a bit like treating a symptom rather than the disease itself. Would you be open to advocating for fixes/improvements to missiles as a whole?
I agree that I was a bit bittervet when I wrote that. In a ideal world hmls would be reverted into their prenerf state, rlmls would also be reversed into pre changed state and a new swarm launcher that would function like the new rlmls would be added. The effects of unbonused ewar really hits the hardest at frig levels and are not as common or usefull at higher levels. #GORSKI4CSM https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4265138#post4265138
|
Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
163
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 02:08:00 -
[138] - Quote
Gorski Car wrote:I agree that I was a bit bittervet when I wrote that.. WHAT? You admitted possibly being in error on the EVE-O forums??? And indicated it might potentially be because of all the crap you've had to deal with??????
Your bittervet card needs to be revoked, good sir.
Also, vote GorskI Car for CSM if you like PvP that doesn't involve semi-AFK mashing F1 while watch x-tube in your browser. |
l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment The Camel Empire
914
|
Posted - 2014.04.19 15:31:00 -
[139] - Quote
Hi Gorski
In your OP you write a bit about FW farmers and that people have problem with them because you can't make them fight. What about a (FW) lowsec ESS where X % of the LP from farmers get collected.
Now the farmers can get together and fight the people on the ESS, or they can live with a lower income.
If you can live with the risk, the FW people can set up their ESS to make more LP, but risk fighting for it.
The idea is to encourage risk/rewar and pvp, and discourage stabbed farming. You can still farm with a stabbed ship and avoid pvp, but people might set up an ESS and collect a share of your riskless farming.
What do you think about this idea. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |
Gorski Car
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
276
|
Posted - 2014.05.11 18:01:00 -
[140] - Quote
No not believing and no time 2 be sad. I am running for CSM 10. I hope you all believe. #GORSKI4CSM https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4265138#post4265138
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |