EVE Search - Sticky:[Summer 2014] Nosferatu RoF Buff

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:[Summer 2014] Nosferatu RoF Buff

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)

CCP Fozzie C C P C C P Alliance 9525	Posted - 2014.04.01 11:43:00 - [1] - Quote Hello everyone! I have a fairly simple tweak to bring forward today, a straightforward improvement in the rate of fire of all Nosferatu modules. We're looking to decrease the duration attribute of all NOS modules by 16.66%, therefore increasing their cap drain over time by 20%. This will serve to improve NOS for all ships, and will pair especially well with the new Blood Raider ship line. The affected stats are (sorry about the formatting, but if you copy and paste the text into a spreadsheet it should format correctly): NameOldDurationNewDuration Small Nosferatu I30002500 E5 Prototype Energy Vampire30002500 Small 'Knave' Energy Drain30002500 Small Diminishing Power System Drain I30002500 Small 'Ghoul' Energy Siphon I30002500 Small Nosferatu II30002500 Dark Blood Small Nosferatu30002500 True Sansha Small Nosferatu30002500 Ammatar Navy Small Nosferatu30002500 Imperial Navy Small Nosferatu30002500 Corpii C-Type Small Nosferatu30002500 Corpii B-Type Small Nosferatu30002500 Corpii A-Type Small Nosferatu30002500 'Upir' Small Nosferatu I30002500 Medium Nosferatu I60005000 Medium Nosferatu II60005000 Dark Blood Medium Nosferatu60005000 True Sansha Medium Nosferatu60005000 Ammatar Navy Medium Nosferatu60005000 Imperial Navy Medium Nosferatu60005000 Medium 'Ghoul' Energy Siphon I60005000 Medium 'Knave' Energy Drain60005000 E50 Prototype Energy Vampire60005000 Medium Diminishing Power System Drain I60005000 Corpum C-Type Medium Nosferatu60005000 Corpum B-Type Medium Nosferatu60005000 Corpum A-Type Medium Nosferatu60005000 'Strigoi' Medium Nosferatu I60005000 Heavy Nosferatu I1200010000 Heavy Nosferatu II1200010000 Dark Blood Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 True Sansha Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Brokara's Modified Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Tairei's Modified Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Selynne's Modified Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Raysere's Modified Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Vizan's Modified Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Ahremen's Modified Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Chelm's Modified Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Draclira's Modified Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Shaqil's Modified Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Ammatar Navy Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Imperial Navy Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Heavy 'Ghoul' Energy Siphon I1200010000 Heavy 'Knave' Energy Drain1200010000 E500 Prototype Energy Vampire1200010000 Heavy Diminishing Power System Drain I1200010000 Corpus C-Type Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Corpus B-Type Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Corpus A-Type Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 Corpus X-Type Heavy Nosferatu1200010000 'Vrykolakas' Heavy Nosferatu I1200010000 Game Designer \| Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/

Khador Vess Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic 175	Posted - 2014.04.01 11:46:00 - [2] - Quote Not sure if trolling or if i should hug you. It is April 1st so.... I used to have a forum sig, but CCP SocksFour stole it....
Arthur Aihaken Arsenite 3172	Posted - 2014.04.01 11:47:00 - [3] - Quote With improvements to NOS, are we going to see enhancements to batteries? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Forlorn Wongraven Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 129	Posted - 2014.04.01 11:49:00 - [4] - Quote My sentinels will love it. Follow me on twitter: @ForlornW Follow my blog: http://crossingzebras.com/author/forlorn-wongraven
Sala Cameron North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion 170	Posted - 2014.04.01 11:51:00 - [5] - Quote is FOR REALZ, no April fool. @sala_cameron
Scatha Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 6	Posted - 2014.04.01 11:52:00 - [6] - Quote I believe nobody on April 1.
Mazzara Gale Force Contractors 8	Posted - 2014.04.01 12:02:00 - [7] - Quote +1 First page post! No matter how much you scrub, how hot of water you use,-áyou can't wash shame!
Morwen Lagann Tyrathlion Interstellar 1149	Posted - 2014.04.01 12:05:00 - [8] - Quote I assume the times are given in milliseconds, not seconds... Morwen Lagann CEO, Tyrathlion Interstellar
Zarnak Wulf In Exile. Imperial Outlaws. 1610	Posted - 2014.04.01 12:18:00 - [9] - Quote Arthur Aihaken wrote: With improvements to NOS, are we going to see enhancements to batteries? Seconding this.
Rowells Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans 382	Posted - 2014.04.01 12:33:00 - [10] - Quote so many zeros...
elitatwo Congregatio 203	Posted - 2014.04.01 13:03:00 - [11] - Quote Though I would have liked my old NOS back, this sounds good. Oh and while you are at it, could you please increase the range of the small NOS a tad and decrease the powergrid use for them? That would be awesome. signature
Guth'Alak EVE University Ivy League 0	Posted - 2014.04.01 13:04:00 - [12] - Quote april fools hah hah.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 4297	Posted - 2014.04.01 13:14:00 - [13] - Quote If true, then Yeehah! If not, then you are a cruel, cruel person. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws." -áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
Gypsio III Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork 1153	Posted - 2014.04.01 13:25:00 - [14] - Quote I told you that last summer's Nos mechanic change would fail and something like this would be necessary. But a blanket change like this still doesn't address the vast gap in use and utility of different-sized Nos. You're boosting the small Nos that arguably doesn't really need fixing, while leaving the unused heavy Nos unfixed. You need size-specific fixes.
Gypsio III Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork 1153	Posted - 2014.04.01 13:31:00 - [15] - Quote Changing the ROF of small Nos to 2.5 s is a nice idea, since it will mesh will with the 5 s cycle of tackle mods. Similarly, the med Nos cycle of 5 s will also mesh well. But what of heavy Nos? It sucks too little to be useful to battleships, with their disproportionately greater cap needs and greater injection rates from heavy injectors, while the 10 s cycle doesn't seem to be synchronised with anything much. It's too hard to fit and it's utterly unreliable in combat, since it only works on targets with a lower absolute cap pool, making a neut a better choice in virtually all situations. You won't have fixed Nos without fixing heavy Nos.
Cecil Arongo Zebra Corp Gentlemen's Agreement 53	Posted - 2014.04.01 13:37:00 - [16] - Quote April Fools lies..... This is for all you new people: I have one rule. Everyone fights, no one quits. If you dont do your job I will shoot you myself. DO YOU GET ME?
KiithSoban Big Johnson's Red Coat Conspiracy 38	Posted - 2014.04.01 13:47:00 - [17] - Quote Thank you. This is badly needed to make the ash less dependent on remote cap. I imagine an ash, with the same stats and these nos changes, would b able to cap drain enough to disrupt a cap transferring logi, while maintaining decent cap life for itself. I want to see logi appear on killmails! (by just repping)-á See CSM "reasonable things"
Nbonga The Greater Goon Clockwork Pineapple 32	Posted - 2014.04.01 13:49:00 - [18] - Quote Sala Cameron wrote: is FOR REALZ, no April fool. I want to believe
Vinyl 41 Perkone Academy 39	Posted - 2014.04.01 14:10:00 - [19] - Quote i smell a weak joke
Hevymetal POT Corp Semper Ardens Alliance 229	Posted - 2014.04.01 14:23:00 - [20] - Quote If this isn't an April fools joke, I think it will be an interesting change. For the better? Only time will tell. I foresee quite a bit more usage of these types of modules now.
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 2039	Posted - 2014.04.01 14:44:00 - [21] - Quote If you are using the suggestion i made to you at the last player meet as a 1. april joke i will be very sad.. If not, NOS needed more ROF, better anti neut. BYDI recruitment closed-ish
Shantetha Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic 45	Posted - 2014.04.01 14:48:00 - [22] - Quote waiting till tomorrow to read this, cause today is "Dont believe no one day"
Louis Robichaud Red Federation RvB - RED Federation 219	Posted - 2014.04.01 15:01:00 - [23] - Quote This is.... Fiendish. See, if this was a 100% bonus or something like that, it would be obvious that it's an April fools. Instead it's a reasonable buff. But it could still be a prank! My interpretation is that the actual April fool prank is releasing it on April first and sowing confusion. A meta prank, if you will
Goldensaver Lom Corporation Brothers of Tangra 387	Posted - 2014.04.01 15:13:00 - [24] - Quote Sala Cameron wrote: is FOR REALZ, no April fool. That's exactly what we'd expect you to say. [Tinfoil Hattery Intensifies]
Lidia Caderu Harbingers of Chaos Inc The East India Co. 27	Posted - 2014.04.01 15:16:00 - [25] - Quote Maybe just make NOS which transfers cap in % ? Not defined amount.
Harvey James The Sengoku Legacy 687	Posted - 2014.04.01 15:35:00 - [26] - Quote NOS are still too difficult too fit on most ships that would actually benefit from using them..... Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please.
TrouserDeagle Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 584	Posted - 2014.04.01 15:37:00 - [27] - Quote if you're looking at the stats on nos, surely you can see that they currently drain half the cap/sec of an easier to fit and more generally useful neut? it kind of sucks that this is the counter to neuts, and you need two of them to counter a single neut. nos should probably drain the same cap/sec as a neut, and imo they should be pretty easy to fit, since they're just a cap defence module. trying to run a rep off one is pretty much just a joke, even if you buff them. so yeah, buff is good, but why by such a tiny amount?
big miker Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed. 68	Posted - 2014.04.01 16:05:00 - [28] - Quote Interceptors and other frigates will be able to permantly run tackle this way. Seriously? More buffs to interceptors?
Deeone Deadspace Zombie Factory 12	Posted - 2014.04.01 16:18:00 - [29] - Quote Speaking of blood raider ships how but giving the skin some love it looks like its covered in poo now not blood......It would be nice to see NOS actually useful again.
Mad Lurker Matari Exodus 1	Posted - 2014.04.01 16:19:00 - [30] - Quote TrouserDeagle wrote: if you're looking at the stats on TC's, surely you can see that they currently BUFF ~half the TRACKING of an easier to fit and more generally useful TD? it kind of sucks that this is the counter to TD, and you need two of them to counter a single TD. TC's should probably BOOST the same TRACKING as a TD, and imo they should be pretty easy to fit, since they're just a TD defence module. trying to HIT a FRIG off one is pretty much just a joke, even if you buff them. so yeah, buff is good, but why by such a tiny amount? I might have altered this You're totaly dismissing the fact you have to use cap to run a neut Target A & B both have 100 cap Target A neuts B for 45 cap it costs him 33,75 (all 5) to do so A has 66,25 Cap left B has 55 cap left Target B Nos A for +8 cap it cost him -8 A has 58,25 cap left B has 63 cap left Unless you have a ship bonused for neuting, a single NOS will be a perfecly good defense against one neut. Now MAYBE your enemy has fitted for neuting and will be able to inject cap somehow and then it's not any more a single neut, but a ship dedicating several of his slots to apply ewar. Edit : i used a T1 small energy neut & T1 small nos for these numbers

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.