This is circular.

There is no advantage, and you have been unable to convince me of the awesome power of the AFK cloaker, so we will have to disagree on this one.

But please let me know when you next lose something to someone who isnt there

No, we're still on:

"Divine Entervention argues about things he has no clue about".

Your inability to correctly play an aspect of the game has no bearing on the balance of the game itself.

All it says is that you are not up the task.

Get better.

Ralph I'd like to ask you a question present you with the same logical fallacy about EvE that encompasses the topic of AFK cloaking since it's an overall question about EvE.

I've listed a possible advantage, information.

I've listed a possible advantage, information.

And Ive told you its worth the paper its printed on

Whether these things are our opinions doesnt change the fact that I dont trust visual intel from a third party or that its reliable or useful.

Kaarous,

Should anyone undocked ever be truly free of risk?

While I am a Sith Lord, and thus licensed to deal in absolutes, I reject that one.

There are numerous circumstances in which someone who is undocked can be free of risk. It's up to the player to use the game mechanics to provide safety for themselves.

Cloaking devices are one of those mechanics. Fortunately they are balanced out in such a way as to prevent a player from taking any actions besides movement while being cloaked.

I asked a simple question Kaarous, please answer with a yes or a no.

Should anyone undocked ever be truly free of risk?

Offering a false dichotomy does not necessitate it's being answered as a legitimate question.

I gave you your answer, whether it was the one you wanted or not.

Did not answer direct question

Pathetic.

Would anyone else like to step in for these 3?

Toss them a life line?

Feel free to phone a friend.

Sell them forum posting insurance?

No, but I am more than happy to sell you a Mining Permit. Only 10 million isk for 365 days, a bargain anyone with a calculator can appreciate.

I see through you.

Ramona,

Should anyone undocked ever be truly free of risk?

Risk from being attacked or all risks financial, emotional and combat related?

As a fake lawyer, you of all people should recognize a false dichotomy when one is thrown out that blatantly.

You know its illegal to falsely claim another person is a lawyer, who is not a lawyer?

But yes, its hilarious how once again you are losing this argument so attrociously badly, that you have to try to resort to pathetic excuses like yours, which infact just dig your hole even deeper.

I am laughing at you, hard. You are an unending source of utter amusement and vindication for me, by comparison of the fact that someone as daft as you actually exists in the world out there.

Keep trying. You will never amount to anything. You just don't have what it takes.

are you certain you were reading this thread?

Within EvE.

So I'm not certain, but I believe that some people might have an issue with AFK cloaking. Though I see no actual evidence that others might actually hold this opinion, since I know it's a possibility it exists, I feel this thread would be a good place to discuss what I believe potentially could be the answer to a possible AFK cloaking problem.

We can't see them. So here's probably the best suggestion to afk cloaking:

Make them visible.

Just like, make it so they can't be targeted and stuff.

Thank you for reading this, I hope to be of further assistance in the future regarding answering the questions to the problems you might not even realize you have yet.

Yes, within EvE

Do you mean all of the above?

You do too, which is why you wont answer it.

Why would anyone answer such an obvious false dichotomy?

Ace, is that you?