| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18178
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ali Aras Corbexx Corebloodbrothers DJ FunkyBacon MajorJSilva Matius Otero Mangala Solaris Mike Axzariah Myyyna Progodlegend Sion Kumitomo Steve Ronuken Sugar Kyle Xander Phoena
Screencap here
Congrats CSM 9
Never go full Ripard |

Magnus Cortex
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
149
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Looks like a good group. |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
3168
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Who are those people? Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
996
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Bloc vote success. |

Seraph Essael
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
642
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
All three of the ones I voted for on there...
Good luck to all the CSM9 Quoted from Doc Fury: "Concerned citizens: Doc seldom plays EVE on the weekends during spring and summer, so you will always be on your own for a couple days a week. Doc spends that time collecting kittens for the on-going sacrifices, engaging in reckless outdoor activities, and speaking in the 3rd person." |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
425
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success.
See, this is the sort of thing that makes people think Dinsdale is RIGHT... |

Karen Avioras
Unsung Heroes The Volition Cult
519
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Everyone I voted for are there. awesome. |

Skurja Volpar
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
88
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:32:00 -
[8] - Quote
Looks ok, not too many suprises.
Thought it might be Psychotic Monk's year this time though. |

Dave Stark
5229
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
****** lineup, but it was to be expected when the choice of candidates was also pretty ******. |

Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2605
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
Congratulations to the CSM9 winners and good luck.  Aaaaaaand relax. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21488
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:34:00 -
[11] - Quote
All my votes counted! \o/ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Nalelmir Ahashion
Omegon 42nd Core
372
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
Karen Avioras wrote:Everyone I voted for are there. awesome. +1 "What's worse than a foul-mouthed eight-year-old constantly claiming he's had relations with your mother? A foul-mouthed eight-year-old constantly claiming he's had relations with your mother who thinks he's a gangser, that's what." --áAaron Birch |

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family Advent of Fate
1008
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:38:00 -
[13] - Quote
Skurja Volpar wrote:Looks good enough, not too many suprises.
Thought it might be Psychotic Monk's year this time though.
i voted for him top on all 3 accounts . Luckily my 2nd and 3rd choices all made it Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85 |

Doireen Kaundur
Minmatar Republic
871
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:40:00 -
[14] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Who are those people?
Winners of a free trip to Iceland. That's about what it amounts to.
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5702
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:40:00 -
[15] - Quote
Silvetica Dian wrote:Skurja Volpar wrote:Looks good enough, not too many suprises.
Thought it might be Psychotic Monk's year this time though. i voted for him top on all 3 accounts  . Luckily my 2nd and 3rd choices all made it
Basically my sentiment as well. Rather sad he didn't make it in. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Jayne Fillon
331
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:42:00 -
[16] - Quote
congratulations all Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI. |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
996
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:46:00 -
[17] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success. See, this is the sort of thing that makes people think Dinsdale is RIGHT...
The conspiracy to silence hi-sec is real. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21490
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:47:00 -
[18] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success. See, this is the sort of thing that makes people think Dinsdale is RIGHT... Yes, but then he starts using words and it all immediately goes away again.  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Sipphakta en Gravonere
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
555
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:47:00 -
[19] - Quote
10 of 14 were on the official CFC ballot. This once again proves: Democracy works! |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
847
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:49:00 -
[20] - Quote
Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success. See, this is the sort of thing that makes people think Dinsdale is RIGHT... The conspiracy to silence hi-sec is real. If we silence them we can't hear them wail.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Gregor Parud
476
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:50:00 -
[21] - Quote
Expected results and expect reaction... why bother anymore. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7231
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:51:00 -
[22] - Quote
if you are unhappy with the current csm i strongly urge you not to vote next year
that will show them Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division. |

Marsha Mallow
432
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:52:00 -
[23] - Quote
Forgot to vote but my candidates still got in \o/
Good luck CSM 9 TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
847
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:53:00 -
[24] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:Expected results and expect reaction... why bother anymore. People with monocles don't get a vote.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
3174
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:56:00 -
[25] - Quote
Get 2000 accounts, run for CSM, elect yourself as chair. DEMOCRACY ! Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

Egor Eads
Big Plays Incorporated
5
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 18:01:00 -
[26] - Quote
Glad Steve Ronuken got in, he was my #1 vote. |

John Ending
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 18:17:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ten of the guys I voted for made it, the process works! |

Seven Koskanaiken
The Shadow Plague Fidelas Constans
1218
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 18:25:00 -
[28] - Quote
No Xenuria, this is an outrage. |

Zarnak Wulf
In Exile. Imperial Outlaws.
1668
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 18:29:00 -
[29] - Quote
I count two Low Sec reps. It's about as good as we were going to get. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2318
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 18:45:00 -
[30] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Who are those people?
I recognize four of the names, not sure if that is a good or a bad thing. This is not a signature. |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1875
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 18:47:00 -
[31] - Quote
*\0/* Go Corebloodbrothers! BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2318
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 18:49:00 -
[32] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success. See, this is the sort of thing that makes people think Dinsdale is RIGHT... The conspiracy to silence hi-sec is real. If we silence them we can't hear them wail.
Probably because the hi-sec wails are drowned out by the constant wailing about hi-sec from Jenn Awhine, Baltec 1 and La Nariz , oh, and that Kaarous person.  This is not a signature. |

Liam Inkuras
Chaotic Tranquility
970
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 18:54:00 -
[33] - Quote
Gorski Car for CSM10 I wear my goggles at night.
Any spelling/grammatical errors come complimentary with my typing on a phone |

Dramaticus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
518
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 19:13:00 -
[34] - Quote
Building a better EVE, one CSM at a time. The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal
The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them |

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 19:25:00 -
[35] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success. See, this is the sort of thing that makes people think Dinsdale is RIGHT... The conspiracy to silence hi-sec is real. If we silence them we can't hear them wail.
You are a legend in your own mind. Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11315
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 19:29:00 -
[36] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Probably because the hi-sec wails are drowned out by the constant wailing about hi-sec from Jenn Awhine, Baltec 1 and La Nariz , oh, and that Kaarous person. 
Most of the stuff we point out as being broken is being fixed
Democracy works. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
1358
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 19:32:00 -
[37] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Probably because the hi-sec wails are drowned out by the constant wailing about hi-sec from Jenn Awhine, Baltec 1 and La Nariz , oh, and that Kaarous person.  Most of the stuff we point out as being broken is being fixed  Democracy works.
Yet you are still waiting for sov and pos's which have yet to be fixed despite the fact that you will soon have new space to fight over using the same old broken sov.
Democracy works... Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1876
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 19:34:00 -
[38] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:you will soon have new space to fight over using the same old broken sov.
That is alot of speculation. BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2318
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 19:35:00 -
[39] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Probably because the hi-sec wails are drowned out by the constant wailing about hi-sec from Jenn Awhine, Baltec 1 and La Nariz , oh, and that Kaarous person.  Most of the stuff we point out as being broken is being fixed  Democracy works.
Sometimes  This is not a signature. |

Themanfromdalmontee
EVE RADIO ARMY
39
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 19:39:00 -
[40] - Quote
Doireen Kaundur wrote:Abrazzar wrote:Who are those people? Winners of a free trip to Iceland. That's about what it amounts to.
Oh Mr cynical please read up on how many actually go and what they do when they aren't there....
Otherwise stop whinging you have no friends. |

stoicfaux
4722
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 19:58:00 -
[41] - Quote
I'm more curious about the voting percentages; what % of eligible votes voted, and what percentage of the votes were "bloc" votes.
WASABI: Warp Acceleration System Ancillary Boost Injected(Gäó)
|

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries Solar Assault Fleet
1089
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 20:22:00 -
[42] - Quote
Uncle Stevie is in. Our world is safe.
CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.
|

Dracnys
67
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:33:00 -
[43] - Quote
Happy to see that Steve Ronuken made it. A strong industry representative is especially important given that it will be the focus of the next expansion.
However I was a bit disappointed by how little time was spent on the CSM in the presentation. I mean it was like 15 minutes on a pink hoodie and 1 minute with the election result. Not even the names were read, just a quick flash of the results. |

Prince Kobol
1678
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:35:00 -
[44] - Quote
honestly could care less.
Over the years I have actively read about all the candidates and voted but this year I found I just could not care less.
None of the candidates really stood out from the crowd and to be honest for me it made no difference who got simply because they were more or less all the same.
|

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
3550
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:12:00 -
[45] - Quote
What does "permanent attendee" mean? |

Dave Stark
5236
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:13:00 -
[46] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:What does "permanent attendee" mean? a polite way of saying some one who isn't welcome, and won't leave when asked. |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
628
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:54:00 -
[47] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:baltec1 wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Probably because the hi-sec wails are drowned out by the constant wailing about hi-sec from Jenn Awhine, Baltec 1 and La Nariz , oh, and that Kaarous person.  Most of the stuff we point out as being broken is being fixed  Democracy works. Sometimes  60% of the time, it works 100% of the time. "it's only because of their stupidity that they're able to be so sure of themselves." The Trial - Franz Kafka-á |

Arthur Aihaken
Erebus Solia
3446
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 23:39:00 -
[48] - Quote
We welcome our new Goon overlords... Er, wait... Wrong thread?  I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
998
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 23:40:00 -
[49] - Quote
Well, nullsec overlords for sure. |

Vahl Ahashion
Risk Breakers Fidelas Constans
19
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 00:06:00 -
[50] - Quote
Riverini didn't want that CSM seat anyway. |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1103
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 01:18:00 -
[51] - Quote
Permanent attendee will be the top two vote getters when we ran the ballots as if electing just two seats rather than 14
They will be automaticlly attending each summit and fanfest 2015
the other 5 to each summit will be chosen by an arcane ritual involving the methods best not spoken of in public
Tank you to all who voted.
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Charlie Firpol
Noob Mercs Monkeys with Guns.
190
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 01:28:00 -
[52] - Quote
We got actual lowsec people on the CSM! *drops dead*
Just missing Gorski. He killed me in a tripple rep fit incursus, that crazy son of... |

MailDeadDrop
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
309
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 01:34:00 -
[53] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Ali Aras Corbexx Corebloodbrothers DJ FunkyBacon MajorJSilva Matius Otero Mangala Solaris Mike Azariah MyyynaProgodlegend Sion Kumitomo Steve Ronuken Sugar Kyle Xander Phoena Screencap hereCongrats CSM 9 I believe you mean Mynnna ...
MDD |

Felicity Love
Whore and Peace
1749
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 01:40:00 -
[54] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:What does "permanent attendee" mean?
... sort of like the "in-laws" who won't get back on the boat and leave.... forever. 
"HTFU ! " -á--- -áKatee Sackhoff, aka "The F-Bomb Queen of EVE" ! !-á
|

Geezelbub
Barely Illegal
12
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 02:27:00 -
[55] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success. See, this is the sort of thing that makes people think Dinsdale is RIGHT... Yes, but then he starts using words and it all immediately goes away again. 
If only you would. |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1000
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 04:05:00 -
[56] - Quote
Geezelbub wrote:Tippia wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success. See, this is the sort of thing that makes people think Dinsdale is RIGHT... Yes, but then he starts using words and it all immediately goes away again.  If only you would.
Why so hostile friend?
Also someone like this post I'm at 999 likes. 1000th like gets 10m isk. |

Lady Areola Fappington
new order logistics CODE.
1738
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 04:11:00 -
[57] - Quote
Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Geezelbub wrote:Tippia wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success. See, this is the sort of thing that makes people think Dinsdale is RIGHT... Yes, but then he starts using words and it all immediately goes away again.  If only you would. Why so hostile friend? Also someone like this post I'm at 999 likes. 1000th like gets 10m isk.
You Command I obey, my Goonish Liege. Send it to Dinsdale.
The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1000
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 04:59:00 -
[58] - Quote
You're free to redistribute your winnings how you see fit! |

Dave Stark
5243
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 06:52:00 -
[59] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Permanent attendee will be the top two vote getters when we ran the ballots as if electing just two seats rather than 14
They will be automaticlly attending each summit and fanfest 2015
the other 5 to each summit will be chosen by an arcane ritual involving the methods best not spoken of in public
Tank you to all who voted.
m
it's a lot less interesting now that you've explained it. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2901
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 06:59:00 -
[60] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
You Command I obey, my Goonish Liege. Send it to Dinsdale.
No thanks, I already have one goon idiot spamming my posts with likes.
So goons ran the table this "election"....shrug. Water is also wet, the sky blue.
The eradication of high sec will continue apace, as the goon's continue with their plans. Every high sec player running inc's or L4 missions, is one not paying a tithe to the cartel lords. They are next on the chopping block , since mynnna et al did such a fine job on high sec and low sec industry.
Someone posted that TQ lost 4000 subs over last year. I have found no citation for that, but it feels right.
Goons convinced CCP that the latest assault on high sec will probably only cost them another 1% of the sub base, and set CCP up for a glorious new future of year over year double digit growth.
Whatever. CCP wrote off WoD, and just slit the throats of the console Dust players in a brilliant piece of PR and customer relations.
Nothing surprises me anymore.
If goons and the other cartels did not have such a vested interest in keeping Eve alive, I would believe that the goons are planning on destroying CCP just to say "look at us, we are so awesome, we wiped out a multi-million dollar company".
The game will continue to become "Null sec Online", and nothing can stop that now.
So, any serf corporations looking for a 127 M SP pilot plus alt accounts that have run the industrial arm of a 100 pilot null sec corp, and have operated in every part of the game, save FW and piracy?
If you can't beat em, join em. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10575
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 07:01:00 -
[61] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Someone posted that TQ lost 4000 subs over last year. I have found no citation for that, but it feels right
the basis of all of dinsdale's thought: "the voices in my head said this, i can't verify it, but it must be true" Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Dave Stark
5243
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 07:08:00 -
[62] - Quote
Andski wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Someone posted that TQ lost 4000 subs over last year. I have found no citation for that, but it feels right the basis of all of dinsdale's thought: "the voices in my head said this, i can't verify it, but it must be true"
also it doesn't matter how many subs were lost, if more were gained in the same time period. |

Jaxon Grylls
Institute of Archaeology
88
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 07:21:00 -
[63] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:honestly could care less.
Over the years I have actively read about all the candidates and voted but this year I found I just could not care less.
None of the candidates really stood out from the crowd and to be honest for me it made no difference who got simply because they were more or less all the same. You can't have it both ways.
You either care a lot or you don't care at all.
It does seem as if the inhabitants of the USA ( if indeed you are from the US) are determined to re-invent the English language.
For example "He caved to the demands of his boss." Should be "He caved in to the demands of his boss."
If you "cave" you are doing what Americans call "Spelunking". Surely not what is meant. I mean although he may beat a hasty retreat from the boss's presence, I don't think that he would disappear into a hole in the ground.
So, do you care or not? A lot of people on the forums do seem to care judging by the amount of posts, but the actual turnout would seem that a lot of non-forum warriors don't.
Me, the sole candidate I voted for was elected, so I'm happy. |

Rain6637
Team Evil
14324
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 08:51:00 -
[64] - Quote
it's a pretty nice feeling when the candidates I/you vote for make it President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub | Rainfleet on Twitch | Rainfleet Mk III-á |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1002
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 09:22:00 -
[65] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Nothing surprises me anymore.
Yeah I don't believe you. |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2797
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 10:55:00 -
[66] - Quote
Skurja Volpar wrote:Looks good enough, not too many suprises.
Thought it might be Psychotic Monk's year this time though.
He was *extremely* busy IRL in the leadup, hadn't been active.
I think votes for him mostly flowed as preferences to DJ FB and Sugar Kyle though.
Edit: Also glad Steve R got on. He was the only person I voted for that wasn't a pirate or e-******* type. Set the universe on fire - then sell the survivors ash. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |

Sibyyl
640
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 10:59:00 -
[67] - Quote
Our eternal dic k-tater on CSM. This will be the year of the Newbie. Take solace knowing that even after the sun sets, and your sky is filled with darkness, that the sun is still shining. -D. Entervention Psychotic Monk joins BNI |

Pubbie Spy
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 11:14:00 -
[68] - Quote
The only person missing from the list is Angry Mustache. Goon dominance on the CSM would have been complete. |

BrundleMeth
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
146
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 11:28:00 -
[69] - Quote
Another irrelevent group with no real power to change anything. Just do away with this farce already... |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3040
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 11:55:00 -
[70] - Quote
It's almost like, if you organise yourselves effectively and work with others for a common goal, that goal is more likely to become reality.
I guess the highsec way of "WHY BOTHER ITS RIGGED BUT ALSO I DONT LIKE THE RESULTS THAT I DID NOTHING TO INFLUENCE DESPITE MY BELIEF THAT PEOPLE OF MY OPINION ARE THE MAJORITY AND THIS IS BAD URGH!" just isn't viable, huh? "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3040
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 11:56:00 -
[71] - Quote
We even called our voting list "Down with highsec" heh.
I guess you get to crawl about in the dirt for another 12 months. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2321
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 12:16:00 -
[72] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:We even called our voting list "Down with highsec" heh.
I guess you get to crawl about in the dirt for another 12 months.
Oh grow up for god's sake. This is not a signature. |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1004
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 13:27:00 -
[73] - Quote
having fun is childish. i better grow up so i can run L4s and shoot at rocks |

BrundleMeth
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
147
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 13:41:00 -
[74] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:We even called our voting list "Down with highsec" heh.
I guess you get to crawl about in the dirt for another 12 months. Oh grow up for god's sake. No kidding...Agreed... |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3040
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 14:35:00 -
[75] - Quote
sore losers itt "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn
Department 10
149
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 14:36:00 -
[76] - Quote
Our votes went to Corebloodbrothers as his campaign statement said he would work to make the results of any CSM advice more democratic. To my mind that meant less null-centric but knowing my luck he might have meant the other way around ?
As in RL if you don't vote you can't complain. That's what I say anyway.  |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1519
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 15:16:00 -
[77] - Quote
Our ballot gets more effective each year coordinating with other groups.
Its almost like learning from the past and adapting behavior for optimal results is a good thing. Or you could just shoot at rocks under concord protection all day and hope the bleating gets you something. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
1699
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 15:19:00 -
[78] - Quote
Oh, don't be so smug about your ballots. Everybody I wanted to get a seat got it and one thing you can't say about lowsec is that we are coordinated and united :)
You just happen to vote for right people, that is all. I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Dave Stark
5245
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 15:29:00 -
[79] - Quote
Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn wrote:Our votes went to Corebloodbrothers as his campaign statement said he would work to make the results of any CSM advice more democratic. To my mind that meant less null-centric but knowing my luck he might have meant the other way around ? As in RL if you don't vote you can't complain. That's what I say anyway. 
if you want it to be less null-centric, maybe the people outside of null sec should vote more. you know, democracy and all. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
429
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 16:08:00 -
[80] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote: if you want it to be less null-centric, maybe the people outside of null sec should vote more. you know, democracy and all.
I really wish voting was monitored by a third party. I do vote, everyone I know votes, all our alts vote, and not one of them voted for a single goon. Granted, that's hardly proof, and frankly I'm eternally suspicious of CCP since they regularly manipulate the sandbox, then claim necessity or pretend it was an accident, and alternatively admit/deny their association with major alliances, who typically directly benefit from CCP actions and/or foreknowledge of CCP plans that the rest of us are not privy to.
CSM minutes? Sure, once everything in them are long over. New pirate ships? Yes, available everywhere, but cheaper for Goonswarm! Elections? All goon votes count double. and their serfs better vote their way if they know what's good for them! |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2325
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 16:08:00 -
[81] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Our ballot gets more effective each year coordinating with other groups.
Its almost like learning from the past and adapting behavior for optimal results is a good thing. Or you could just shoot at rocks under concord protection all day and hope the bleating gets you something.
Or you could spam the forms and hope your bleating gets you something.
Oh the goons do that already  This is not a signature. |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1520
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 16:21:00 -
[82] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Aryth wrote:Our ballot gets more effective each year coordinating with other groups.
Its almost like learning from the past and adapting behavior for optimal results is a good thing. Or you could just shoot at rocks under concord protection all day and hope the bleating gets you something. Or you could spam the forms and hope your bleating gets you something. Oh the goons do that already 
Looks like one of our behaviors is working too eh? Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Galen Darksmith
Sky Fighters Sky Syndicate
205
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 16:35:00 -
[83] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote: if you want it to be less null-centric, maybe the people outside of null sec should vote more. you know, democracy and all.
I really wish voting was monitored by a third party. I do vote, everyone I know votes, all our alts vote, and not one of them voted for a single goon. Granted, that's hardly proof, and frankly I'm eternally suspicious of CCP since they regularly manipulate the sandbox, then claim necessity or pretend it was an accident, and alternatively admit/deny their association with major alliances, who typically directly benefit from CCP actions and/or foreknowledge of CCP plans that the rest of us are not privy to. CSM minutes? Sure, once everything in them are long over. New pirate ships? Yes, available everywhere, but cheaper for Goonswarm! Elections? All goon votes count double. and their serfs better vote their way if they know what's good for them!
Goonswarm and the CFC comprise some 30,000-odd votes. This is just a ballpark number, but hopefully it gives you an idea of why you, everyone you know, and your alts (which probably comes to no more than 500 votes, and that's being generous) aren't really passing muster when it comes to highsec being "organized." And additionally, you'd need to have a ballot that was filled up; if you had one hisec messiah to vote for and that's it, guess what? You'd have one hisec carebear messiah on the CSM, and the rest of the election results would go the same as they did this time.
So, if you actually want to change the general election results, you'd have to
- Get organized. Hisec has a huge theoretical player base. - Get motivated. You need a lot of candidates to replace the ones you don't like, which means a lot of people willing to invest time into the game.
Of course, neither of these will actually happen. Most bears live in hisec so that they DON'T have to coordinate with other players or be particularly motivated about anything in the game. Just don't be surprised that the organized and motivated groups tend to come out on top. "EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for." -CCP Wrangler |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1520
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 16:41:00 -
[84] - Quote
Galen Darksmith wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote: if you want it to be less null-centric, maybe the people outside of null sec should vote more. you know, democracy and all.
I really wish voting was monitored by a third party. I do vote, everyone I know votes, all our alts vote, and not one of them voted for a single goon. Granted, that's hardly proof, and frankly I'm eternally suspicious of CCP since they regularly manipulate the sandbox, then claim necessity or pretend it was an accident, and alternatively admit/deny their association with major alliances, who typically directly benefit from CCP actions and/or foreknowledge of CCP plans that the rest of us are not privy to. CSM minutes? Sure, once everything in them are long over. New pirate ships? Yes, available everywhere, but cheaper for Goonswarm! Elections? All goon votes count double. and their serfs better vote their way if they know what's good for them! Goonswarm and the CFC comprise some 30,000-odd votes. This is just a ballpark number, but hopefully it gives you an idea of why you, everyone you know, and your alts (which probably comes to no more than 500 votes, and that's being generous) aren't really passing muster when it comes to highsec being "organized." And additionally, you'd need to have a ballot that was filled up; if you had one hisec messiah to vote for and that's it, guess what? You'd have one hisec carebear messiah on the CSM, and the rest of the election results would go the same as they did this time. So, if you actually want to change the general election results, you'd have to - Get organized. Hisec has a huge theoretical player base. - Get motivated. You need a lot of candidates to replace the ones you don't like, which means a lot of people willing to invest time into the game. Of course, neither of these will actually happen. Most bears live in hisec so that they DON'T have to coordinate with other players or be particularly motivated about anything in the game. Just don't be surprised that the organized and motivated groups tend to come out on top.
You can lead the pubbies to water which they will not drink. Or you can let them die of thirst and use their corpses for your garden.
I tried the former at first too.
Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
849
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 16:45:00 -
[85] - Quote
Galen Darksmith wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote: if you want it to be less null-centric, maybe the people outside of null sec should vote more. you know, democracy and all.
I really wish voting was monitored by a third party. I do vote, everyone I know votes, all our alts vote, and not one of them voted for a single goon. Granted, that's hardly proof, and frankly I'm eternally suspicious of CCP since they regularly manipulate the sandbox, then claim necessity or pretend it was an accident, and alternatively admit/deny their association with major alliances, who typically directly benefit from CCP actions and/or foreknowledge of CCP plans that the rest of us are not privy to. CSM minutes? Sure, once everything in them are long over. New pirate ships? Yes, available everywhere, but cheaper for Goonswarm! Elections? All goon votes count double. and their serfs better vote their way if they know what's good for them! Goonswarm and the CFC comprise some 30,000-odd votes. This is just a ballpark number, but hopefully it gives you an idea of why you, everyone you know, and your alts (which probably comes to no more than 500 votes, and that's being generous) aren't really passing muster when it comes to highsec being "organized." And additionally, you'd need to have a ballot that was filled up; if you had one hisec messiah to vote for and that's it, guess what? You'd have one hisec carebear messiah on the CSM, and the rest of the election results would go the same as they did this time. So, if you actually want to change the general election results, you'd have to - Get organized. Hisec has a huge theoretical player base. - Get motivated. You need a lot of candidates to replace the ones you don't like, which means a lot of people willing to invest time into the game. Of course, neither of these will actually happen. Most bears live in hisec so that they DON'T have to coordinate with other players or be particularly motivated about anything in the game. Just don't be surprised that the organized and motivated groups tend to come out on top. Or just let us handle things. Everything we advocate for is better for the game as a whole.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Dave Stark
5246
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 16:49:00 -
[86] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote: if you want it to be less null-centric, maybe the people outside of null sec should vote more. you know, democracy and all.
I really wish voting was monitored by a third party. I do vote, everyone I know votes, all our alts vote, and not one of them voted for a single goon. Granted, that's hardly proof, and frankly I'm eternally suspicious of CCP since they regularly manipulate the sandbox, then claim necessity or pretend it was an accident, and alternatively admit/deny their association with major alliances, who typically directly benefit from CCP actions and/or foreknowledge of CCP plans that the rest of us are not privy to. CSM minutes? Sure, once everything in them are long over. New pirate ships? Yes, available everywhere, but cheaper for Goonswarm! Elections? All goon votes count double. and their serfs better vote their way if they know what's good for them!
great, you and your buddy didn't vote for goons.
alternatively the rest of us just voted for people who would just make good CSM candidates. look at this year's line up, the null sec candidates were the best candidates. not to mention, now we've actually got to vote for a list of 14 people, it promotes apathy. I personally voted for less than half of my ballot because there literally weren't any candidates worthy of a vote, even just to fill up my list. then i didn't bother voting on my alts, because i just didn't care enough with such a ****** lineup.
regardless of the apathy, in game affiliations really have little to nothing to do with the quality of some one as a csm candidate. i'd vote for mynnna every time because i sincerely think he's one of the best csm candidates going. i sincerely doubt there are 14 people i'd rather vote for than him, let alone having all 14 of them actually running. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2326
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 18:01:00 -
[87] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Aryth wrote:Our ballot gets more effective each year coordinating with other groups.
Its almost like learning from the past and adapting behavior for optimal results is a good thing. Or you could just shoot at rocks under concord protection all day and hope the bleating gets you something. Or you could spam the forms and hope your bleating gets you something. Oh the goons do that already  Looks like one of our behaviors is working too eh?
Enlighten me, what have the goons 'persuaded' CCP' to do, that they would not have otherwise done?
I suspect that goons try to take credit where none is due. This is not a signature. |

Serene Repose
1335
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 18:03:00 -
[88] - Quote
Nevah hoid uvvem. So, what else is new? I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility toward every form of tyranny over the mind of man.-á |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2228
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 18:46:00 -
[89] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote: if you want it to be less null-centric, maybe the people outside of null sec should vote more. you know, democracy and all.
I really wish voting was monitored by a third party. I do vote, everyone I know votes, all our alts vote, and not one of them voted for a single goon. Granted, that's hardly proof, and frankly I'm eternally suspicious of CCP since they regularly manipulate the sandbox, then claim necessity or pretend it was an accident, and alternatively admit/deny their association with major alliances, who typically directly benefit from CCP actions and/or foreknowledge of CCP plans that the rest of us are not privy to. CSM minutes? Sure, once everything in them are long over. New pirate ships? Yes, available everywhere, but cheaper for Goonswarm! Elections? All goon votes count double. and their serfs better vote their way if they know what's good for them!
The tinfoil in this post is several meters thick and reinforced with even more tinfoil. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2228
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 18:47:00 -
[90] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Aryth wrote:Our ballot gets more effective each year coordinating with other groups.
Its almost like learning from the past and adapting behavior for optimal results is a good thing. Or you could just shoot at rocks under concord protection all day and hope the bleating gets you something. Or you could spam the forms and hope your bleating gets you something. Oh the goons do that already 
You pubbies started it, you should have known better than to start a forum war against a forum community. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2326
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 19:40:00 -
[91] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Aryth wrote:Our ballot gets more effective each year coordinating with other groups.
Its almost like learning from the past and adapting behavior for optimal results is a good thing. Or you could just shoot at rocks under concord protection all day and hope the bleating gets you something. Or you could spam the forms and hope your bleating gets you something. Oh the goons do that already  You pubbies started it, you should have known better than to start a forum war against a forum community.
Hey mom. it was him wot stared it not me  This is not a signature. |

Dave Stark
5249
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 20:07:00 -
[92] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote: if you want it to be less null-centric, maybe the people outside of null sec should vote more. you know, democracy and all.
I really wish voting was monitored by a third party. I do vote, everyone I know votes, all our alts vote, and not one of them voted for a single goon. Granted, that's hardly proof, and frankly I'm eternally suspicious of CCP since they regularly manipulate the sandbox, then claim necessity or pretend it was an accident, and alternatively admit/deny their association with major alliances, who typically directly benefit from CCP actions and/or foreknowledge of CCP plans that the rest of us are not privy to. CSM minutes? Sure, once everything in them are long over. New pirate ships? Yes, available everywhere, but cheaper for Goonswarm! Elections? All goon votes count double. and their serfs better vote their way if they know what's good for them! The tinfoil in this post is several meters thick and reinforced with even more tinfoil.
so... don't stick it in the microwave? |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
429
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 21:58:00 -
[93] - Quote
La Nariz wrote: You pubbies started it, you should have known better than to start a forum war against a forum community.
Time for a quick history lesson:
The ONLY alliance to ever bring down the forum by spamming threads until the forum software died? Goonswarm.
Now, you were saying?
Rhes wrote: Or just let us handle things. Everything we advocate for is better for goonswarm as a whole.
Fixed.
The simple solution would be for one vote per player, as opposed to one vote per account. |

Pubbie Spy
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:14:00 -
[94] - Quote
Rhes wrote: Or just let us handle things. Everything we advocate for is better for the game as a whole.
Surprisingly, this is actually true most of the time. |

Pubbie Spy
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:15:00 -
[95] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Enlighten me, what have the goons 'persuaded' CCP' to do, that they would not have otherwise done?
I suspect that goons try to take credit where none is due.
We find an overpowered or exploitable game mechanic. :ccp: keeps ignoring the problem. We run that **** into the ground and smugpost about it on the forum and our CSMs tell :ccp: to fix it. :ccp: fixes it and predictably takes our stuff away. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
4865
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:30:00 -
[96] - Quote
Lol my old CEO and corp founder is in CSM now. Who would have seen that coming?
Bring back DEEEEP Space! |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5734
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:33:00 -
[97] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Lol my old CEO and corp founder is in CSM now. Who would have seen that coming?
*sigh*
I'll bite. Which one? "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
429
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:39:00 -
[98] - Quote
Pubbie Spy wrote:Rhes wrote: Or just let us handle things. Everything we advocate for is better for the game as a whole.
Surprisingly, this is actually true most of the time.
There are occasional agree with goonswarms position, goons will be the death of eve.
Two basic reasons for this:
One, eve requires conflict. Any sufficiently large alliance has a chilling effect on large scale conflict, no matter how PvP oriented, simply by nature. The bigger and more obviously favored the alliance and it's assorted hangers on are, the fewer competitors will attempt to confront them.
Eve would be better served if alliances were hard limited at about 500 characters. It would only delay things, but it would hamper the rise of the sort of super alliances we see in other servers, and that goonswarm and it's allies are gradually evolving into
Eventually it reaches a point where the only scenario in which a viable adversary comes along is something like happened in China where the super alliance splits due to internal drama.
The second reason is that goons generally have an 'Us vs Them' view of High sec, and promote a agenda to pretty much nerf high sec into non existance. The reality is for Eve to continue to flourish and attract new players, both areas have to be developed equally. The basic truth is that players quit rather than change their play styles when a game tries to force it on them, and CCP needs income. So high sec needs love just as much as null does in order for the game to continue to be developed. You can claim that eve is better off without those players, but CCP is not better off without that subscription money.
A lot of people might diss Dinsdale, but the overarching tendency to favor nullsec more and more is getting pretty marked, and it's going to eventually reach a tipping point where people start unsubbing. Maybe not all at once or right away, and I can't say if his numbers are right, but think on this: server concurrency has been stagnate for some time, reguardless of subscription numbers. Worse, in the same stretch, other games concurrency have been increasing.
Hell, TOR has even made bigger gains, percentage wise. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15279
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:43:00 -
[99] - Quote
Is it really so ******* hard for you people to understand that actually ******* voting will generally increase your chances of seeing the candidates you want get elected?
Maybe you should suggest that CCP should use a new voting system for CSM10: the Single Transferrable Whine system. For every petulant, entitled, self-centred and useless post you make - on any forum - about the CSM process, you get a vote. This system should ensure your hegemony in eternity.
If you mouthy oxygen thieves put 1% of the effort into participating that you do into complaining about not winning when you, er, didn't participate, you'd crush the goons and hear the lamentations of their waifus.
But no.
For a year I have had to read over and over and over again the same old complaint "CCP expect me to actually put some effort into researching who I want to vote for and then as well expect me to go to all the trouble of voting again. And also other people are allowed to vote for people I don't like, what the hell? A bloo bloo ******* hoo."
Well here's the truth, buttercups: the following people are glad as hell that all you do is cry instead of voting:
(1) Me (2) People who care about the game
Stay useless, idiots. We need you to.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15287
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:46:00 -
[100] - Quote
Incidentally to save you Moaning Myrtles the trouble of actually clicking a button, I have reported the above post to ISD for lack of respect towards other forums users. Consider it my last act on your behalf as a player rep.
I.
Plead.
Guilty. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5737
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:47:00 -
[101] - Quote
Did... did he just make a Harry Potter reference? "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5313
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:49:00 -
[102] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Incidentally to save you Moaning Myrtles the trouble of actually clicking a button, I have reported the above post to ISD for lack of respect towards other forums users. Consider it my last act on your behalf as a player rep.
I.
Plead.
Guilty.
Classy to the end..
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1919
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:52:00 -
[103] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Incidentally to save you Moaning Myrtles the trouble of actually clicking a button, I have reported the above post to ISD for lack of respect towards other forums users. Consider it my last act on your behalf as a player rep.
I.
Plead.
Guilty.
I <3 you Malcanis, sad you didnt run this year. BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |

Marsha Mallow
469
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:52:00 -
[104] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Incidentally to save you Moaning Myrtles the trouble of actually clicking a button, I have reported the above post to ISD for lack of respect towards other forums users. Consider it my last act on your behalf as a player rep.
I.
Plead.
Guilty. Well, on behalf of those who appreciate the effort put in over the last year: thank you. You did a good job and it is appreciated. Don't take too long a break  TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
429
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:53:00 -
[105] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Is it really so ******* hard for you people to understand that actually ******* voting will generally increase your chances of seeing the candidates you want get elected?
Um, Malcanis, that was sort of the point. Everyone I knew voted AGAINST the guys we got, and goons pointed out that it DID NOT MATTER because their alliance and co voted that way, and that was 30k votes. |

Marsha Mallow
469
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:53:00 -
[106] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:goons will be the death of eve. Taking their time about it aren't they? TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7273
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:54:00 -
[107] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Malcanis wrote:Is it really so ******* hard for you people to understand that actually ******* voting will generally increase your chances of seeing the candidates you want get elected?
Um, Malcanis, that was sort of the point. Everyone I knew voted AGAINST the guys we got, and goons pointed out that it DID NOT MATTER because their alliance and co voted that way, and that was 30k votes. you're a highseccer
everyone you know is you and your cat Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5737
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 22:56:00 -
[108] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Malcanis wrote:Is it really so ******* hard for you people to understand that actually ******* voting will generally increase your chances of seeing the candidates you want get elected?
Um, Malcanis, that was sort of the point. Everyone I knew voted AGAINST the guys we got, and goons pointed out that it DID NOT MATTER because their alliance and co voted that way, and that was 30k votes.
In which case, democracy is working.
Get more friends, and get organized. That or kiss the ring, your choice.
But quit crying about "my vote didn't matter". Whether it does or not is up to you. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15288
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:00:00 -
[109] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Malcanis wrote:Is it really so ******* hard for you people to understand that actually ******* voting will generally increase your chances of seeing the candidates you want get elected?
Um, Malcanis, that was sort of the point. Everyone I knew voted AGAINST the guys we got, and goons pointed out that it DID NOT MATTER because their alliance and co voted that way, and that was 30k votes.
No it wasn't you bad-at-maths liar. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Penguinizer Illat
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
5
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:00:00 -
[110] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:[quote=Malcanis] Um, Malcanis, that was sort of the point. Everyone I knew voted AGAINST the guys we got, and goons pointed out that it DID NOT MATTER because their alliance and co voted that way, and that was 30k votes.
So you failed to organize enough people? You could talk to people outside of your alliance and alts, you could get people interested. You could try to reach people that might not have even known that there was an election. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15293
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:06:00 -
[111] - Quote
So yeah, here's the thing.
I've just come back from FanFest X. I had a really good time*. I went to some panels and presentations and whatnot (btw: apologies for the craptastic CSM panel; there was supposed to be a presentation and stats and facts and such, but there was apparently a technical difficulty, so we got stranded in "So... er... any questions?" mode). I spent most of my time talking to other EVE players. Not just devs, not just CSM people, mostly just ordinary EVE (and some DUST) players.
Here's a thing I discovered that you need to know: there are players out there who genuinely like this game. They're able to combine scepticism with enthusiasm. They can see the upsides of change as well as downsides. You can discuss development with them, and even people who are worried that their current profession is threatened or challenged can have a sensible conversation about how to adapt and even profit.
It's possible.
Who knew?
*Many thanks for the free holiday "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15293
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:08:00 -
[112] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote:Malcanis wrote:Incidentally to save you Moaning Myrtles the trouble of actually clicking a button, I have reported the above post to ISD for lack of respect towards other forums users. Consider it my last act on your behalf as a player rep.
I.
Plead.
Guilty. Well, on behalf of those who appreciate the effort put in over the last year: thank you. You did a good job and it is appreciated. Don't take too long a break 
You told me that you regretted voting for me before the election was even over!
Anyway the moral is: never read forums. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5741
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:09:00 -
[113] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
Anyway the moral is: never read forums.
More like never take them to heart. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3165
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:09:00 -
[114] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Malcanis wrote:Is it really so ******* hard for you people to understand that actually ******* voting will generally increase your chances of seeing the candidates you want get elected?
Um, Malcanis, that was sort of the point. Everyone I knew voted AGAINST the guys we got, and goons pointed out that it DID NOT MATTER because their alliance and co voted that way, and that was 30k votes. didn't stop my candidates getting elected |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
429
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:10:00 -
[115] - Quote
Weaselior wrote: you're a highseccer
everyone you know is you and your cat
Tell you what, next time I blow past goons in null, I want you guys put up a thread titled 'Highseccer made us look like bitches'.
We'll see how fast you change what part of space I live in.
Which is all of them, pretty much. I don't actually stay in any one place very long, Fountain and Aridia were about the longest... |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3165
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:11:00 -
[116] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:I've just come back from FanFest X. I had a really good time good. thanks for being csm for us |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3910
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:11:00 -
[117] - Quote
Malcanis wrote: Anyway the moral is: never read forums.
http://stockfresh.com/files/l/lisafx/m/76/768278_stock-photo-businessman---on-the-nose.jpg "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Marsha Mallow
469
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:17:00 -
[118] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:You told me that you regretted voting for me before the election was even over!
Anyway the moral is: never read forums. I lied 
Just stick to one. And don't read them sober. Same as playing! TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Alphea Abbra
Common Sense Ltd Nulli Secunda
751
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:21:00 -
[119] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Is it really so ******* hard for you people to understand that actually ******* voting will generally increase your chances of seeing the candidates you want get elected?
Maybe you should suggest that CCP should use a new voting system for CSM10: the Single Transferrable Whine system. For every petulant, entitled, self-centred and useless post you make - on any forum - about the CSM process, you get a vote. This system should ensure your hegemony in eternity.
If you mouthy oxygen thieves put 1% of the effort into participating that you do into complaining about not winning when you, er, didn't participate, you'd crush the goons and hear the lamentations of their waifus.
But no.
For a year I have had to read over and over and over again the same old complaint "CCP expect me to actually put some effort into researching who I want to vote for and then as well expect me to go to all the trouble of voting again. And also other people are allowed to vote for people I don't like, what the hell? A bloo bloo ******* hoo."
Well here's the truth, buttercups: the following people are glad as hell that all you do is cry instead of voting:
(1) Me (2) People who care about the game
Stay useless, idiots. We need you to.
CSM of my heart. Beautiful rant. |

Sibyyl
651
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:22:00 -
[120] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Incidentally to save you Moaning Myrtles the trouble of actually clicking a button, I have reported the above post to ISD for lack of respect towards other forums users. Consider it my last act on your behalf as a player rep.
I.
Plead.
Guilty. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Take solace knowing that even after the sun sets, and your sky is filled with darkness, that the sun is still shining. -D. Entervention Psychotic Monk joins BNI |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15296
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:24:00 -
[121] - Quote
Sibyyl wrote:Malcanis wrote:Incidentally to save you Moaning Myrtles the trouble of actually clicking a button, I have reported the above post to ISD for lack of respect towards other forums users. Consider it my last act on your behalf as a player rep.
I.
Plead.
Guilty. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
Why don't you go vote about it? "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2907
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:25:00 -
[122] - Quote
Well, the only thing this new set of lobbyists does is ensure that high sec is wiped out at an even more accelerated rate. Naturally, a year from now, and subs are down even more, I am sure it will be the fault of the high sec casual player for not willing to adapt.
That is unless, of course, the null sec cartels don't mandate all their serfs to open up a new account, solely to boost the subscription base.
It is abundantly clear that the cartels have directed CCP to give up on the concept of growing the width of the base, put instead pin their hopes on hard core players opening up even more alt accounts, at least until Valkyrie is ready for release. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

John Ending
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
17
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:28:00 -
[123] - Quote
Hi Dinsdale sup buddy. |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1923
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:33:00 -
[124] - Quote
Malcanis while you are here: What is up with you leaving Init? BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
429
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:34:00 -
[125] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Well, the only thing this new set of lobbyists does is ensure that high sec is wiped out at an even more accelerated rate. Naturally, a year from now, and subs are down even more, I am sure it will be the fault of the high sec casual player for not willing to adapt.
That is unless, of course, the null sec cartels don't mandate all their serfs to open up a new account, solely to boost the subscription base.
It is abundantly clear that the cartels have directed CCP to give up on the concept of growing the width of the base, put instead pin their hopes on hard core players opening up even more alt accounts, at least until Valkyrie is ready for release.
Dinsdale, three things.
Yeah, that first part is what I also predict will happen, and the forum response.
The second part I don't see happening as it's impossible to enforce without CCP getting sued, laws of Iceland or no.
The third part I agree with again, as that's pretty much what happened with Ultima Online, so there's precedent there. |

Sibyyl
652
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:38:00 -
[126] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Why don't you go vote about it? Not sure why you're getting all worked up. I voted like everyone else who took the time to read the platforms and pick their candidates. CSM is decided. Even as ex-CSM, I think your behavior should be classy. You're an example to the rank and file of EVE, like me.
Or, stomp up and down and flag posts to ISD like a GD pubbie. Take solace knowing that even after the sun sets, and your sky is filled with darkness, that the sun is still shining. -D. Entervention Psychotic Monk joins BNI |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5744
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:39:00 -
[127] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote: The third part I agree with again, as that's pretty much what happened with Ultima Online, so there's precedent there.
Lol what?
Yeah, I'm not letting that one pass.
Ultima Online is one of the greatest examples of a game sacrificing it's loyal playerbase at the altar of "mainstream appeal". It was the first game to truly kill itself for the sake of casuals, and remains one of the most painful examples of this as well, as no game since has had such a depth of player freedom as UO once had. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3166
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:43:00 -
[128] - Quote
Sibyyl wrote:Or, stomp up and down and flag posts to ISD like a GD pubbie. he flagged his own post but it has mysteriously disappeared in the meantime |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10589
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:50:00 -
[129] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Well, the only thing this new set of lobbyists does is ensure that high sec is wiped out at an even more accelerated rate. Naturally, a year from now, and subs are down even more, I am sure it will be the fault of the high sec casual player for not willing to adapt.
That is unless, of course, the null sec cartels don't mandate all their serfs to open up a new account, solely to boost the subscription base.
It is abundantly clear that the cartels have directed CCP to give up on the concept of growing the width of the base, put instead pin their hopes on hard core players opening up even more alt accounts, at least until Valkyrie is ready for release.
If hisec is wiped out at an even more accelerated rate the game is vastly improved at an even more accelerated rate Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Sibyyl
659
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 23:55:00 -
[130] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Sibyyl wrote:Or, stomp up and down and flag posts to ISD like a GD pubbie. he flagged his own post but it has mysteriously disappeared in the meantime Well, CSM has to been known to make things mysteriously disappear.
Zing. Take solace knowing that even after the sun sets, and your sky is filled with darkness, that the sun is still shining. -D. Entervention Psychotic Monk joins BNI |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
429
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 00:00:00 -
[131] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Ultima Online is one of the greatest examples of a game sacrificing it's loyal playerbase at the altar of "mainstream appeal". It was the first game to truly kill itself for the sake of casuals, and remains one of the most painful examples of this as well, as no game since has had such a depth of player freedom as UO once had.
I'm assuming you left at the server split in 2000 then when PvP was restricted. Things didn't actually get bad until Age of Shadows. |

Marsha Mallow
472
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 00:01:00 -
[132] - Quote
Andski wrote:If hisec is wiped out at an even more accelerated rate the game is vastly improved at an even more accelerated rate I'm in favour of slow death. So we can watch them squirm.
Continue.
Leave Malcy alone Sibyyl, he was one of the CSMs nominated to watch the forums. No-one deserves that. He's earned some stomping :) TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
429
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 00:03:00 -
[133] - Quote
Andski wrote: If hisec is wiped out at an even more accelerated rate the game is vastly improved at an even more accelerated rate
I'll bet you 2m isk that the game collapses rather than improves if they were to do that. |

Sibyyl
659
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 00:05:00 -
[134] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote:Leave Malcy alone Sibyyl, he was one of the CSMs nominated to watch the forums. No-one deserves that. He's earned some stomping :) Aye aye o7
Malcanis we love you <3 Take solace knowing that even after the sun sets, and your sky is filled with darkness, that the sun is still shining. -D. Entervention Psychotic Monk joins BNI |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2804
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 00:13:00 -
[135] - Quote
I really hope Dinsdale runs for CSM sometime. EVE can be a heartless place at times, and comic relief is much appreciated.
(He might have already done so, I laugh too much every time he posts to notice). Set the universe on fire - then sell the survivors ash. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |

Magnus Cortex
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
152
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 00:19:00 -
[136] - Quote
Highsec needs a savior guys, who's it gonna be? |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2911
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 00:56:00 -
[137] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:I really hope Dinsdale runs for CSM sometime. EVE can be a heartless place at times, and comic relief is much appreciated.
(He might have already done so, I laugh too much every time he posts to notice).
Nope. Won't be me. I have zero interest in the inevitable real life harassment I would be subjected to for starters.
Secondly, in this era of the internet being forever, I don't want my name associated with Eve, or for that matter, any video game. I don't want some future employer googling my name and saying "oh man, this guy is a real geek with video games."
Finally, I would be running on such an obstructionist platform that I would be considered "unprofessional", and no way CCP would even let me sit on the CSM, even if I got the required votes.
Besides, the die has been cast, the Rubicon crossed.
But the cartels do have to walk a fine line with the dismantling of high sec though. Yes, they want to drive people into null serfdom to increase the leaders' income streams, but they also know that their own serfs do make enough ISK to finance their game play. I can't discuss on these forums the next logical step in this discussion, but there is clearly a supply / demand issue that becomes a big problem if high sec is completely removed from the game. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
851
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 01:42:00 -
[138] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I can't discuss on these forums the next logical step in this discussion, but there is clearly a supply / demand issue that becomes a big problem if high sec is completely removed from the game. Please start a blog.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Galen Darksmith
Sky Fighters Sky Syndicate
206
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 02:44:00 -
[139] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Ultima Online is one of the greatest examples of a game sacrificing it's loyal playerbase at the altar of "mainstream appeal". It was the first game to truly kill itself for the sake of casuals, and remains one of the most painful examples of this as well, as no game since has had such a depth of player freedom as UO once had.
I'm assuming you left at the server split in 2000 then when PvP was restricted. Things didn't actually get bad until Age of Shadows.
You are literally the first UO player (assuming you actually played UO) who actually thought Trammel was anything other than the beginning of the end of the game.
At this rate, you probably thought the NGE was a great idea. "EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for." -CCP Wrangler |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2228
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 02:50:00 -
[140] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Andski wrote: If hisec is wiped out at an even more accelerated rate the game is vastly improved at an even more accelerated rate
I'll bet you 2m isk that the game collapses rather than improves if they were to do that.
Bet accepted now lets start wiping out highsec, I think a good rate is 10 systems per hour. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Shiloh Templeton
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
121
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 03:00:00 -
[141] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:Democracy works... If you have an intelligent and informed electorate.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. -- Winston Churchill
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10608
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 03:07:00 -
[142] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Sabriz Adoudel wrote:I really hope Dinsdale runs for CSM sometime. EVE can be a heartless place at times, and comic relief is much appreciated.
(He might have already done so, I laugh too much every time he posts to notice). Nope. Won't be me. I have zero interest in the inevitable real life harassment I would be subjected to for starters. Secondly, in this era of the internet being forever, I don't want my name associated with Eve, or for that matter, any video game. I don't want some future employer googling my name and saying "oh man, this guy is a real geek with video games." Finally, I would be running on such an obstructionist platform that I would be considered "unprofessional", and no way CCP would even let me sit on the CSM, even if I got the required votes. Besides, the die has been cast, the Rubicon crossed. But the cartels do have to walk a fine line with the dismantling of high sec though. Yes, they want to drive people into null serfdom to increase the leaders' income streams, but they also know that their own serfs do make enough ISK to finance their game play. I can't discuss on these forums the next logical step in this discussion, but there is clearly a supply / demand issue that becomes a big problem if high sec is completely removed from the game.
1) nobody is going to harass you because, really, nobody cares enough
2) yeah you do have a point if I were you I probably wouldn't want my real life name associated with paranoid rants about cartels
3) maybe an "obstructionist platform" is not the best choice because "if elected I promise to impede any progress and halt all discussion by running around the room screaming" won't get you elected or flown to reykjavik if you /are/ elected Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Frying Doom
3645
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 03:10:00 -
[143] - Quote
Still no actual official announcement on the forums.
Or the voting statistics.
It has always been put up just after the fan fest announcement every year. Why the delay? Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10608
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 03:13:00 -
[144] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:It has always been put up just after the fan fest announcement every year. Why the delay?
the medical term is veisalgia Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Glathull
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
393
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 03:14:00 -
[145] - Quote
I don't know. This looks really suspicious to me. For example, I didn't vote. None of my 3 accounts voted. Yet somehow, 14 people I didn't vote for managed to get elected.
If that doesn't stink of conspiracy, I don't know what does. To repeat, the skill split is scheduled for the big Summer 2013 expansion. ~CCP Fozzie |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
432
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 03:53:00 -
[146] - Quote
Galen Darksmith wrote: You are literally the first UO player (assuming you actually played UO) who actually thought Trammel was anything other than the beginning of the end of the game.
At this rate, you probably thought the NGE was a great idea.
No, I reserve that for 3rd Dawn. It might surprise you that I thought at teh time that Trammel was a good compromise between players that wanted PvP and those that didn't.
Statistically though, UO had it's biggest number of subscribers during Age of Shadows and then started to taper off. Surprisingly, EA just announced that they were opening a new studio to continue development on it.
And I hated NGE, as anyone who had to bust their ass to become a Jedi should. Even now as I prepare to enjoy my new Sky Palace on the Smugglers Moon, I shudder to think of it. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10611
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 04:23:00 -
[147] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:I'll bet you 2m isk that the game collapses rather than improves if they were to do that.
free of the tyranny of entitled pubbies, eve online would thrive Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Dalloway Jones
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
234
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 04:28:00 -
[148] - Quote
So the people who claim that high sec should be wiped out are the same people who come to the forums and cry when a cloaked ship is sitting in a system all day, right? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10611
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 04:31:00 -
[149] - Quote
Dalloway Jones wrote:So the people who claim that high sec should be wiped out are the same people who come to the forums and cry when a cloaked ship is sitting in a system all day, right?
hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

IDGAD
Get in the van I have candy.
129
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 04:37:00 -
[150] - Quote
So who are all these people? |

Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts
304
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 04:45:00 -
[151] - Quote
Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success.
Dirty bloc voters are the reason why National, labour, the greens and NZ first party candidates keep getting in.
On a more related note, congrats to the new CSM. Hope you guys build up on what CSM 8 has laid the ground work on. looks like another good mix.
|

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
433
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 04:51:00 -
[152] - Quote
Andski wrote: hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship
After all these years, If i lose a ship it's my own damn fault, unless CCP decided to do something like revisit the active tank bug that kicked you out of the game when you turned on an active tanking module. Boy did I feel smart using passive resists that day.
The flip side of the argument is that lowsec and null players demand that noob ships be delivered directly to their gank point on undocking, because most of them are lazy, and nothing makes you want something like being told you can't have it. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2327
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 05:00:00 -
[153] - Quote
Andski wrote:Dalloway Jones wrote:So the people who claim that high sec should be wiped out are the same people who come to the forums and cry when a cloaked ship is sitting in a system all day, right? hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship
Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense. This is not a signature. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
4865
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 05:12:00 -
[154] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski wrote:Dalloway Jones wrote:So the people who claim that high sec should be wiped out are the same people who come to the forums and cry when a cloaked ship is sitting in a system all day, right? hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense.
He's been like this all day. I think he needs a hug or something. Bring back DEEEEP Space! |

Dalloway Jones
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
235
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 05:16:00 -
[155] - Quote
Get rid of local in null. That will really make him cranky. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10617
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 05:22:00 -
[156] - Quote
Dalloway Jones wrote:Get rid of local in null. That will really make him cranky.
Sure, get rid of CONCORD in hisec and we'll happily give up local. After all, local makes 0.0 safer than hisec, right? Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10617
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 05:26:00 -
[157] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense.
it's a shame that i'm right because if you visit F&I or GD on any given day, you'll see at least three threads asking for wardecs to be nerfed to the point where they only exist in name, asking for concord buffs or for some other nerfs to hisec aggression Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2329
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 06:21:00 -
[158] - Quote
Andski wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense. it's a shame that i'm right because if you visit F&I or GD on any given day, you'll see at least three threads asking for wardecs to be nerfed to the point where they only exist in name, asking for concord buffs or for some other nerfs to hisec aggression
Okay, I'll go with your figures for the sake of argument.
21 threads a week wanting - demanding - whinging, hi-sec to be 'safer' etc.
The majority of Eve players play in hi-sec, so I can live with 21 of them a week starting threads wanting a safer hi-sec.
This 21, are a tiny minority, some of whom will be brand spanking new players who will soon come to their senses, some of them will be pixel hard-men alts setting up h-sec to take a hit and some of them are playing the wrong game.
I can live with that, so can CCP 
Market forces and all that my dear chap, if hi-sec is so bad for the game, why does it have most of the players? This is not a signature. |

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1468
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 06:53:00 -
[159] - Quote
Skurja Volpar wrote:Thought it might be Psychotic Monk's year this time though. looked at him.... removed from my list after question about E1... The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2913
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 07:11:00 -
[160] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Still no actual official announcement on the forums.
Or the voting statistics.
It has always been put up just after the fan fest announcement every year. Why the delay?
I think the dev blog last year was a couple days behind the actual CSM results were released, if my memory serves. But yeah, if they results are not up by Tuesday / Wednesday it would be safe to assume that there subscription numbers in there that they don't want having a whole lot of light shone on.
I have asked it before, and have been met with stony silence. Does the Chinese server have its own CSM, or none?
When CCP releases the subs, will they factor in the Chinese server numbers as well? Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
1166
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 07:42:00 -
[161] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:I really hope Dinsdale runs for CSM sometime.
My guess is he can't run because he doesn't meet the age requirement set by CCP. Then there's the fact that he's guaranteed to lose because the three guys who agree with his nonsense won't provide enough votes. Of course, those mysterious nullsec cartels could always get him voted on for their own sinister and nefarious purposes. That would be hilarious, though maybe not for Dinny. 
Rhes wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I can't discuss on these forums the next logical step in this discussion, but there is clearly a supply / demand issue that becomes a big problem if high sec is completely removed from the game. Please start a blog.
Oh god, if only. And none of that heavy-handed moderation of valid dissenting comments like some power tripping bloggers enjoy, please. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
436
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 07:47:00 -
[162] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: When CCP releases the subs, will they factor in the Chinese server numbers as well?
Considering they trumpeted that subs had increased when the Chinese server opened, I'll do with yes. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15305
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 07:56:00 -
[163] - Quote
I'll say this for Dinsdale: at least he doesn't run around bleating that "The CSM are useless".
His faith in our effectiveness was often inspiring. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2330
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 08:13:00 -
[164] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:I'll say this for Dinsdale: at least he doesn't run around bleating that "The CSM are useless".
His faith in our effectiveness was often inspiring.
If there is indeed a cartel operating to get CCP to kill hi-sec, it is, to put it mildly, a failure. This is not a signature. |

Jaxon Grylls
Institute of Archaeology
92
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 08:30:00 -
[165] - Quote
There's a question that's been puzzling me.
If, as is claimed, Goons are "winning" EVE and that their superior organising powers have ensured that they dominate the CSM.
Why are they so defensive?
Any criticism or difference of opinion is met with scorn, insult and plain old fashioned disrespect.
Is it insecurity, hubris or immaturity?
I've no idea but suspect that it may be a combination of all three.
Or could it be that like the farm-yard cockerel, they just enjoy crowing from their little dung-hill?
All things must pass and that includes the Goons and EVE itself, but until such times, please be a bit more respectful of others, stop the gratuitous insults and for God's sake grow up. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11325
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 08:55:00 -
[166] - Quote
Jaxon Grylls wrote:There's a question that's been puzzling me.
If, as is claimed, Goons are "winning" EVE and that their superior organising powers have ensured that they dominate the CSM.
Why are they so defensive?
Any criticism or difference of opinion is met with scorn, insult and plain old fashioned disrespect.
Is it insecurity, hubris or immaturity?
I've no idea but suspect that it may be a combination of all three.
Or could it be that like the farm-yard cockerel, they just enjoy crowing from their little dung-hill?
All things must pass and that includes the Goons and EVE itself, but until such times, please be a bit more respectful of others, stop the gratuitous insults and for God's sake grow up.
We talk to people the same way they talk to us. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Jaxon Grylls
Institute of Archaeology
93
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 10:34:00 -
[167] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:We talk to people the same way they talk to us. Then claim the moral high ground and refuse to indulge in such activities.
Or could it be that you really enjoy all the angst and dislike?
Just like Millwall football club supporters.
They have a chant "Everybody hates us, we don't care."
I suspect that deep down they do care. Same with you. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
3171
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 11:52:00 -
[168] - Quote
Didn't vote, don't care. Eagerly awaiting the next witch hunt for more forum hijinx. Oh god. |

Myriad Blaze
Common Sense Ltd Nulli Secunda
229
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 11:59:00 -
[169] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote: I really wish voting was monitored by a third party. I do vote, everyone I know votes, all our alts vote, and not one of them voted for a single goon. Granted, that's hardly proof, and frankly I'm eternally suspicious of CCP since they regularly manipulate the sandbox, then claim necessity or pretend it was an accident, and alternatively admit/deny their association with major alliances, who typically directly benefit from CCP actions and/or foreknowledge of CCP plans that the rest of us are not privy to.
CSM minutes? Sure, once everything in them are long over. New pirate ships? Yes, available everywhere, but cheaper for Goonswarm! Elections? All goon votes count double. and their serfs better vote their way if they know what's good for them!
I'm neither a goon nor a "goon serf". And yet I did vote (on all of my accounts) for some candidates who are in Goonswarm Federation (among others) - despite the fact that they would likely try to pod me in space (and vice versa) if the opportunity arises.
When I voted for the CSM I voted for people who I believe can work together to help make EVE a better game, people who know their stuff and who I think are capable of seeing the broader picture. Mynna is a very good example and has proven several times why he - at least imho - should be included in the CSM.
The CSM is not about N3/PL or the CFC or about null sec, or low or high sec, it's about EVE. And null sec, low sec, high sec, N3/PL and the CFC are all a part of EVE (and no small parts either).
|

King Fu Hostile
Imperial Collective Unsettled.
81
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 12:00:00 -
[170] - Quote
IDGAD wrote:So who are all these people?
Mangala makes pvp happen Steve Ronuken is a cool guy from the 3rd party dev community
no idea about the rest, but they probably shouldn't be anywhere near the CSM
|

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2230
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 13:18:00 -
[171] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski wrote:Dalloway Jones wrote:So the people who claim that high sec should be wiped out are the same people who come to the forums and cry when a cloaked ship is sitting in a system all day, right? hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense.
If we don't communicate down on your level you won't understand what we're saying. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2330
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 13:25:00 -
[172] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski wrote:Dalloway Jones wrote:So the people who claim that high sec should be wiped out are the same people who come to the forums and cry when a cloaked ship is sitting in a system all day, right? hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense. If we don't communicate down on your level you won't understand what we're saying.
Dear La Nariz...your response says more about you than I would wish to say whilst staying within the forum rules really...
On the bright side, it is great that really young folk like you play Eve, it helps to ensure the game has a future if you stick with it.
Take care. This is not a signature. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
6329
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 13:26:00 -
[173] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Rhes wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success. See, this is the sort of thing that makes people think Dinsdale is RIGHT... The conspiracy to silence hi-sec is real. If we silence them we can't hear them wail. Probably because the hi-sec wails are drowned out by the constant wailing about hi-sec from Jenn Awhine, Baltec 1 and La Nariz , oh, and that Kaarous person. 
That is an awful lot of butthurt from one guy.
Hmm, in fact it's a suspicious amount of butt hurt.....
*Sets internet to record and initiates 'Detective' voice*
So, Mr Djugashvilis, where were you on the weekend of 3 May 2014? And that gray stuff near your wrist..... is that Icelandic Monument dust on your sleeve? |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
6329
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 13:28:00 -
[174] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski wrote:Dalloway Jones wrote:So the people who claim that high sec should be wiped out are the same people who come to the forums and cry when a cloaked ship is sitting in a system all day, right? hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense. If we don't communicate down on your level you won't understand what we're saying.
i tried to speak Hi-secish once at work, damn near got fired for it.
|

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3050
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 13:37:00 -
[175] - Quote
Jaxon Grylls wrote:There's a question that's been puzzling me.
If, as is claimed, Goons are "winning" EVE and that their superior organising powers have ensured that they dominate the CSM.
Why are they so defensive?
Any criticism or difference of opinion is met with scorn, insult and plain old fashioned disrespect.
Is it insecurity, hubris or immaturity?
I've no idea but suspect that it may be a combination of all three.
Or could it be that like the farm-yard cockerel, they just enjoy crowing from their little dung-hill?
All things must pass and that includes the Goons and EVE itself, but until such times, please be a bit more respectful of others, stop the gratuitous insults and for God's sake grow up.
We have our own forums for having intelligent discourse. When we come somewhere where 90% of the audience/posters are screaming man-babies hoping if they squeal enough they will get their own way, at the expense of the rest of the people in the game, we treat them in the manner that is deserving.
Also, to be honest, a lot of GSF posters are just going to rile you up because it highlights how impotent you are to do anything about it. You would think that the lesson you might take from GSF's history is that if you believe in yourself and organise well, you can rise up to supplant the super-powers in Eve. Somehow, the grrrGOONS brigade have taken to just looking at the status quo and then cry and stamp their feet and ask for CCP to do something about it. It's fun to point out they're screwing themselves over and then crying about it.
I mean look at Josef here, months and months (if not years) of whining and wailing on the forums about Goons/nullsec, and has never done anything about it. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

I Have 18Accounts
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 13:39:00 -
[176] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:La Nariz wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski wrote:Dalloway Jones wrote:So the people who claim that high sec should be wiped out are the same people who come to the forums and cry when a cloaked ship is sitting in a system all day, right? hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense. If we don't communicate down on your level you won't understand what we're saying. Dear La Nariz...your response says more about you than I would wish to say whilst staying within the forum rules really... On the bright side, it is great that really young folk like you play Eve, it helps to ensure the game has a future if you stick with it. Take care. La Nariz - 0 This guy - 1 |

I Have 18Accounts
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 13:45:00 -
[177] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Jaxon Grylls wrote:There's a question that's been puzzling me.
If, as is claimed, Goons are "winning" EVE and that their superior organising powers have ensured that they dominate the CSM.
Why are they so defensive?
Any criticism or difference of opinion is met with scorn, insult and plain old fashioned disrespect.
Is it insecurity, hubris or immaturity?
I've no idea but suspect that it may be a combination of all three.
Or could it be that like the farm-yard cockerel, they just enjoy crowing from their little dung-hill?
All things must pass and that includes the Goons and EVE itself, but until such times, please be a bit more respectful of others, stop the gratuitous insults and for God's sake grow up. We have our own forums for having intelligent discourse. When we come somewhere where 90% of the audience/posters are screaming man-babies hoping if they squeal enough they will get their own way, at the expense of the rest of the people in the game, we treat them in the manner that is deserving. Also, to be honest, a lot of GSF posters are just going to rile you up because it highlights how impotent you are to do anything about it. You would think that the lesson you might take from GSF's history is that if you believe in yourself and organise well, you can rise up to supplant the super-powers in Eve. Somehow, the grrrGOONS brigade have taken to just looking at the status quo and then cry and stamp their feet and ask for CCP to do something about it. It's fun to point out they're screwing themselves over and then crying about it. I mean look at Josef here, months and months (if not years) of whining and wailing on the forums about Goons/nullsec, and has never done anything about it. Trolling the forums is actually against the TOS and EULA. CCP simply doesn't enforce the rules. There is nothing anyone else can do about that, really.
If you're talking about opposing you guys in game... the word that comes to mind is propaganda. That is the propaganda Goons spread that the rest of the EVE community hates them. I'm not sure what the motivation for it is... but let me be one of the first to say: Most of the community doesn't hate Goons or want them gone.
This battle in your minds where all us "pubbies" gather around plotting for your destruction is just that; a battle in your minds.
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5775
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 13:53:00 -
[178] - Quote
I Have 18Accounts wrote: This battle in your minds where all us "pubbies" gather around plotting for your destruction is just that; a battle in your minds.
Except for:
Insurance nerfs.
Concord buffs.
Barge buffs.
Both Crimewatch.
MTU "bug" fix.
And that's just in the last couple of years. Writing's on the wall, dude. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2915
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 14:04:00 -
[179] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Malcanis wrote:I'll say this for Dinsdale: at least he doesn't run around bleating that "The CSM are useless".
His faith in our effectiveness was often inspiring. If there is indeed a cartel operating to get CCP to kill hi-sec, it is, to put it mildly, a failure.
I think you will find when the dust settles on the last set of changes, and factoring in what will happen to T2 invention in the fall if gets the same kind of treatment, that the cartels have been highly effective.
Remember, their campaign on high sec is like a null sec sov campaign. Even after a headshot, there is a ton of fighting unless the losers just cave in and quit. And high sec subscribers have not reached that point yet, at least not the bulk yet.
goons start all wars like that, expecting a grind, trying to make the game as much "unfun" as they can.
The cartels and their dev's have been bleeding high sec dry for years no, bit by bit, drop by drop. First shot that I can remember is how soundwave wrecked agent RP, but there were likely ones before that. And remember, CCP can't afford a "headshot" to high sec, not until they think the demographics change a lot more, and enough people have migrated to null sec to keep the lights on when the killer blow does hammer down on high sec.
So what we have is a little bit more impoverishment of high sec, a little more enrichment of null sec, every major release, and now, it will be every 6 weeks. If the propaganda is to be believed (which it is not), the typical casual high sec player only hangs around in high sec 7 months before they quit or move to null / wormholes or even low. That means the baseline of expectations of what high sec should be keeps degrading, as a new crop of high sec players show up with no memory of the losses high sec has incurred.
It is abundantly clear that the cartel leaders have directed CCP to give up on that 7 month casual player that won't ever move to null sec. CCP has been convinced that there will always be enough new grist for the mill that will sub up for 6 or 7 months out of curiosity after reading about some epic battle (hey CCP, I see that the huge spike in player activity dropped away real fast), and a flow of disposable subscriptions will continue at a steady pace, regardless of how much high sec is a wasteland.
That logic is of course, utterly insane, but CCP's actions clearly demonstrate that is their opinion of high sec players.
So yeah, if you look at the CSM in that context, they are highly effective, at least the cartel portion, which is the overwhelming majority again in the latest iteration.
So, the next 4 or 5 mini-releases:
1. Tweaking all the new levers with this industry overhaul in order to not break the economy, but allow for an orderly transition of the vast vast majority of the high sec industrial wealth to null sec. 2. Some slight tweaks to sov mechanics, but pretty much cosmetic. 3. T2 invention wrecked for high sec as industry just was. 4. And then, the next body blow to high sec, Incursion and mission income hammered in some way. I always believed it would just be some across the board nerf to bounties, but I see now that it will be more insidious. More like the removal of all loot from missions, and the buffing of the Incursion rats, making the sites take longer to finish.
Oh yes, and I must not forget POS's. When null sec industry gets really geared up, which will take at least a couple months to happen, if the cartels feel that POS's can play a large role in that industry, then POS mechanics will get some love. If it remains high sec, low sec, and wh's complaining about POS mechanics, nothing serious will be done "because it's hard".
Notice I say nothing about serious sov mechanics nor force projection. The cartels will likely want a quiet summer, maybe even the fall, so no major changes there. That being said, CCP is now leaning on the cartels to provide even larger amounts of publicity on a regular basis to provide that high sec grist I spoke of earlier. So the cartels will have to arrange some kind of big event , likely near the end of summer, early fall, as the effects of the high sec casual industrial player exiting the game really start to show up in the sub numbers.
That is the beauty of the whole CCP subscription mechanics and the cartel's plans. Because of multi-month subs, any game mechanic change that drives people from the game is lagged and spread over time, so the cartels can obfuscate the real impact a game mechanic change had on the sub base.
By the time the next set of subscription numbers are released, so many things will have changed, the cartels and CCP can state any number of factors drove the subscription changes. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Pubbie Spy
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
39
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 14:07:00 -
[180] - Quote
Jaxon Grylls wrote: moral high ground
Moral high... hahahahahahahaha
Glathull wrote:I don't know. This looks really suspicious to me. For example, I didn't vote. None of my 3 accounts voted. Yet somehow, 14 people I didn't vote for managed to get elected.
If that doesn't stink of conspiracy, I don't know what does.
There is always space on the goonspiracy bandwagon.
Myriad Blaze wrote: When I voted for the CSM I voted for people who I believe can work together to help make EVE a better game, people who know their stuff and who I think are capable of seeing the broader picture. Mynna is a very good example and has proven several times why he - at least imho - should be included in the CSM.
This is eveo, why are you posting so well?
|

Pubbie Spy
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
39
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 14:11:00 -
[181] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote::tinfoil:
Never stop posting. Maybe you should write for the Eve Onion? |

Dave Stark
5287
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 14:12:00 -
[182] - Quote
i love dinsdale's postings. it's like sitting in the common room of a loony bin. |

Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
366
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 14:45:00 -
[183] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:words
Preach on, brother, preach on. Continue to rail on, despite the daily two minutes of hate that you have to endure from these spoon-fed goons. Your truthiness will lead us all to the light.
Already, your inspired posting has got portions of high sec all in a tizzy over those damn enemies of high sec . . . ebil null bears. The future is now! A Thousand Points of Light! A Line In The Sand!
In conclusion, if I may be so bold (and if you take requests) could you PLEASE give us a simple post that explains why the upcoming release of Legion is also a nerf to high sec?
I am not an alt of Chribba. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21549
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 15:21:00 -
[184] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:The cartels and their dev's have been bleeding high sec dry for years no, bit by bit, drop by drop. Can you provide any actual examples of this? Having RP collection be more effective if you do it actively hardly counts as GÇ£bleeding something dryGÇ¥.
Quote:That logic is of course, utterly insane That's because it's your logic, not something that has any basis in reality.
Quote:3. T2 invention wrecked for high sec as industry just was. You realise, of course, that highsec industry just got massively buffed, right?
Quote:Notice I say nothing about serious sov mechanics nor force projection. The cartels will likely want a quiet summer, maybe even the fall, so no major changes there. GǪaside from the pretty significant adjustment on force projection that is happening. So it's rather odd that you say nothing about that unless you have some oddball agenda to completely say the exact opposite of what's happening. Of course, if you had such an agenda, it would rather explain the other things you've said so far.
Tell, me Dinsdale, what will you do when GÇö as always GÇö the doom you're prophesying inevitably fails to manifest? Will you and your fellow EVE-millerites have an analogue to the Great Disappointment? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Solecist Project's Alt
Wildly Inept Pacifists
48
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 15:25:00 -
[185] - Quote
I'm out of tea and coffee right now, but this thread is hilarious in its own way.
Thanks! |

Billy McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
349
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 15:27:00 -
[186] - Quote
Tippia wrote: Tell, me Dinsdale, what will you do when GÇö as always GÇö the doom you're prophesying inevitably fails to manifest? Will you and your fellow EVE-millerites have an analogue to the Great Disappointment?
aye donet no wat peeple hava ganst deensdul paranid
he maeks cumpleat snes two me "Thread locked for being deemed a total loss." - ISD Ezwal |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
1223
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 15:59:00 -
[187] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:The cartels and their dev's have been bleeding high sec dry for years no, bit by bit, drop by drop. Can you provide any actual examples of this? Having RP collection be more effective if you do it actively hardly counts as GÇ£bleeding something dryGÇ¥. Quote:That logic is of course, utterly insane That's because it's your logic, not something that has any basis in reality. Quote:3. T2 invention wrecked for high sec as industry just was. You realise, of course, that highsec industry just got massively buffed, right? Quote:Notice I say nothing about serious sov mechanics nor force projection. The cartels will likely want a quiet summer, maybe even the fall, so no major changes there. GǪaside from the pretty significant adjustment on force projection that is happening. So it's rather odd that you say nothing about that unless you have some oddball agenda to completely say the exact opposite of what's happening. Of course, if you had such an agenda, it would rather explain the other things you've said so far. Tell, me Dinsdale, what will you do when GÇö as always GÇö the doom you're prophesying inevitably fails to manifest? Will you and your fellow EVE-millerites have an analogue to the Great Disappointment? oh, go easy on him, he's clearly just finished "Shock Doctrine". Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á Soylent Green Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3052
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:05:00 -
[188] - Quote
I Have 18Accounts wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:La Nariz wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense. If we don't communicate down on your level you won't understand what we're saying. Dear La Nariz...your response says more about you than I would wish to say whilst staying within the forum rules really... On the bright side, it is great that really young folk like you play Eve, it helps to ensure the game has a future if you stick with it. Take care. La Nariz - 0 This guy - 1[/quote] Should have added: we don't need to post on alts to make it look like someone supports us. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Medalyn Isis
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
185
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:05:00 -
[189] - Quote
I am quite happy the Ali Arias got in again, as she seemed competent last year.
Also good to see Steve get in as I voted for him myself.
The rest, they will need to prove themselves worthy. |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3053
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:08:00 -
[190] - Quote
I Have 18Accounts wrote:This battle in your minds where all us "pubbies" gather around plotting for your destruction is just that; a battle in your minds. I specifically stated that you are neither willing nor able to "plot" - did you read my post?
If you're denying there's lots of anti-goon hatred on here, and elsewhere, let me know how many examples I need to quote. You would have to have some serious reading comprehension issues to have not seen them before, mind. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Tauranon
Weeesearch Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
956
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:20:00 -
[191] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
The cartels and their dev's have been bleeding high sec dry for years no, bit by bit, drop by drop. First shot that I can remember is how soundwave wrecked agent RP, but there were likely ones before that. And remember, CCP can't afford a "headshot" to high sec, not until they think the demographics change a lot more, and enough people have migrated to null sec to keep the lights on when the killer blow does hammer down on high sec.
ahh, CCP had to seriously nerf null (namely tech), in order to begin the process of making null more useful as living space than as buffer for a mewn.
Quote:
So what we have is a little bit more impoverishment of high sec, a little more enrichment of null sec, every major release, and now, it will be every 6 weeks. If the propaganda is to be believed (which it is not), the typical casual high sec player only hangs around in high sec 7 months before they quit or move to null / wormholes or even low. That means the baseline of expectations of what high sec should be keeps degrading, as a new crop of high sec players show up with no memory of the losses high sec has incurred.
Remind when I go to nullsec to farm me mah very own stratio.... oh wait I can get that in highsec, no risk required. wonder what that did for LP value eh ?
Quote:
It is abundantly clear that the cartel leaders have directed CCP to give up on that 7 month casual player that won't ever move to null sec. CCP has been convinced that there will always be enough new grist for the mill that will sub up for 6 or 7 months out of curiosity after reading about some epic battle (hey CCP, I see that the huge spike in player activity dropped away real fast), and a flow of disposable subscriptions will continue at a steady pace, regardless of how much high sec is a wasteland.
Bearing in mind I'm a completely dedicated PVE pilot, PVP is in fact a lot of fun. Amusingly I enjoyed killing a buzzard last week pretty much as much as I enjoyed getting the a-type invuln, a-type booster combo drop from a ded plex and pretty much as much as I enjoyed defeating the maze first time up. Particularly because I squeezed the hunt and kill inbetween work and volleyball, and spent quite a bit of duty night chuckling over it
note that on the flipside, I am a far better "E" than a computer, and that is despite the fact that realistically I am not actually a good PVPer. I did however learn from my first encounters the order of stuff that needs to get done to get a kill on a really bad opponent.
Making people into ingame ninjas is about the best thing CCP can do to give them the future ability to avoid fights, and to pick and choose their fights and thus find winnable fights (ie I'm at I think 12 for 0 losses out here right now).
Quote:
That logic is of course, utterly insane, but CCP's actions clearly demonstrate that is their opinion of high sec players.
So yeah, if you look at the CSM in that context, they are highly effective, at least the cartel portion, which is the overwhelming majority again in the latest iteration.
No its actually a bitter truth that it costs money to get subs from wherever CCP gets subs from, and that a 2 year sub is worth a lot more in profit than a 6 month sub, because the 4 highsec players required as alternatives, will have 4x the acquisition costs.
Quote:
So, the next 4 or 5 mini-releases:
1. Tweaking all the new levers with this industry overhaul in order to not break the economy, but allow for an orderly transition of the vast vast majority of the high sec industrial wealth to null sec. 2. Some slight tweaks to sov mechanics, but pretty much cosmetic. 3. T2 invention wrecked for high sec as industry just was. 4. And then, the next body blow to high sec, Incursion and mission income hammered in some way. I always believed it would just be some across the board nerf to bounties, but I see now that it will be more insidious. More like the removal of all loot from missions, and the buffing of the Incursion rats, making the sites take longer to finish.
Oh yes, and I must not forget POS's. When null sec industry gets really geared up, which will take at least a couple months to happen, if the cartels feel that POS's can play a large role in that industry, then POS mechanics will get some love. If it remains high sec, low sec, and wh's complaining about POS mechanics, nothing serious will be done "because it's hard".
Notice I say nothing about serious sov mechanics nor force projection. The cartels will likely want a quiet summer, maybe even the fall, so no major changes there. That being said, CCP is now leaning on the cartels to provide even larger amounts of publicity on a regular basis to provide that high sec grist I spoke of earlier. So the cartels will have to arrange some kind of big event , likely near the end of summer, early fall, as the effects of the high sec casual industrial player exiting the game really start to show up in the sub numbers.
That is the beauty of the whole CCP subscription mechanics and the cartel's plans. Because of multi-month subs, any game mechanic change that drives people from the game is lagged and spread over time, so the cartels can obfuscate the real impact a game mechanic change had on the sub base.
By the time the next set of subscription numbers are released, so many things will have changed, the cartels and CCP can state any number of factors drove the subscription changes.
bleargh subs are confounded with so many things its not funny.
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2916
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:23:00 -
[192] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote: oh, go easy on him, he's clearly just finished "Shock Doctrine".
Naomi Kline is quite the insightful writer. I could not finish the book some years ago, I was going to throw it against the wall when incident heinous act after heinous act by the corporatists was detailed.
This is what it all boils down to. On one side we have the libertarians, who adore Eve because it is their twisted vision of what their real world utopia is. On the other side, you have the sane, moral, compassionate people, who are horrified by the distillation into a game of all that is wrong with humanity. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Billy McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
352
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:24:00 -
[193] - Quote
*mune "Thread locked for being deemed a total loss." - ISD Ezwal |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2334
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:24:00 -
[194] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:I Have 18Accounts wrote:This battle in your minds where all us "pubbies" gather around plotting for your destruction is just that; a battle in your minds. I specifically stated that you are neither willing nor able to "plot" - did you read my post? If you're denying there's lots of anti-goon hatred on here, and elsewhere, let me know how many examples I need to quote. You would have to have some serious reading comprehension issues to have not seen them before, mind.
Try not to mistake laughing at goons in the forums with goons for anti-goon hatred.
Still, if you want to think folk hate the goons, don't let me stop you. This is not a signature. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5787
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:26:00 -
[195] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: On one side we have the libertarians, who adore Eve because it is their twisted vision of what their real world utopia is. On the other side, you have the sane, moral, compassionate people, who are horrified by the distillation into a game of all that is wrong with humanity.
Yeah, personal freedom is just so evil, am I right?
Or should we only have the freedom to choose if we choose correctly? "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Billy McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
352
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:27:00 -
[196] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: This is what it all boils down to. On one side we have the libertarians, who adore Eve because it is their twisted vision of what their real world utopia is. On the other side, you have the sane, moral, compassionate people, who are horrified by the distillation into a game of all that is wrong with humanity.
it is sew obverous aye dunno wye annywun cude dissagrey
i wisxh dinsday parasol wude run four cee ess emm butt i kno teh carttles wud bloch him if hee tryd
butt he is write, yoo shud knot deny teh obverse even iff its funnie two "Thread locked for being deemed a total loss." - ISD Ezwal |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3054
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:31:00 -
[197] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:I Have 18Accounts wrote:This battle in your minds where all us "pubbies" gather around plotting for your destruction is just that; a battle in your minds. I specifically stated that you are neither willing nor able to "plot" - did you read my post? If you're denying there's lots of anti-goon hatred on here, and elsewhere, let me know how many examples I need to quote. You would have to have some serious reading comprehension issues to have not seen them before, mind. Try not to mistake laughing at goons in the forums with goons for anti-goon hatred. Still, if you want to think folk hate the goons, don't let me stop you.
Duuuuuuuuuude. You were meant to reply with the other alt. Now everyone can see your "+1 to this guy!" post was yourself.
This is pretty awkward now. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2334
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:41:00 -
[198] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:I Have 18Accounts wrote:This battle in your minds where all us "pubbies" gather around plotting for your destruction is just that; a battle in your minds. I specifically stated that you are neither willing nor able to "plot" - did you read my post? If you're denying there's lots of anti-goon hatred on here, and elsewhere, let me know how many examples I need to quote. You would have to have some serious reading comprehension issues to have not seen them before, mind. Try not to mistake laughing at goons in the forums with goons for anti-goon hatred. Still, if you want to think folk hate the goons, don't let me stop you. Duuuuuuuuuude. You were meant to reply with the other alt. Now everyone can see your "+1 to this guy!" post was yourself. This is pretty awkward now.
You are La Nairz' younger brother right? This is not a signature. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2916
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:47:00 -
[199] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: On one side we have the libertarians, who adore Eve because it is their twisted vision of what their real world utopia is. On the other side, you have the sane, moral, compassionate people, who are horrified by the distillation into a game of all that is wrong with humanity.
Yeah, personal freedom is just so evil, am I right? Or should we only have the freedom to choose if we choose correctly?
Ah, spoken like a true Randian. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Dave Stark
5294
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:50:00 -
[200] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: On one side we have the libertarians, who adore Eve because it is their twisted vision of what their real world utopia is. On the other side, you have the sane, moral, compassionate people, who are horrified by the distillation into a game of all that is wrong with humanity.
Yeah, personal freedom is just so evil, am I right? Or should we only have the freedom to choose if we choose correctly? Ah, spoken like a true Randian.
gevlon has students? |

King Fu Hostile
Imperial Collective Unsettled.
83
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:57:00 -
[201] - Quote
Dinsdale Piranha wrote:More like the removal of all loot from missions, and the buffing of the Incursion rats, making the sites take longer to finish.
these are pretty good suggestions mate
|

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
Panhandle Industries Order of the Exalted
516
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 16:58:00 -
[202] - Quote
Zarnak Wulf wrote:I count two Low Sec reps. It's about as good as we were going to get. That's better than the griefer community got. I hope DJ FunkyBacon does a decent job of representing us even if he isn't a high sec candidate. New player resources: http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Main_Page - General information http://www.evealtruist.com/p/know-your-enemy.html - Learn to PvP http://belligerentundesirables.com/ - Safaris, Awoxes, Ganking and Griefing-á |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2916
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 17:11:00 -
[203] - Quote
King Fu Hostile wrote:Dinsdale Piranha wrote:More like the removal of all loot from missions, and the buffing of the Incursion rats, making the sites take longer to finish. these are pretty good suggestions mate
It is not like I am giving the CSM ideas. These directives, and more, have already delivered to the CCP dev's. Like I have said before, every pilot generating PvE income in high sec is someone not paying a tithe to the cartel leaders, and they can't have that. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
1726
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 17:22:00 -
[204] - Quote
Wow, I didn't know 'tithe' was English word for that "pay your master 1/10th of your earnings" thing. Live and learn, live and learn... I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Winchester Steele
1109
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 17:27:00 -
[205] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:King Fu Hostile wrote:Dinsdale Piranha wrote:More like the removal of all loot from missions, and the buffing of the Incursion rats, making the sites take longer to finish. these are pretty good suggestions mate It is not like I am giving the CSM ideas. These directives, and more, have already delivered to the CCP dev's. Like I have said before, every pilot generating PvE income in high sec is someone not paying a tithe to the cartel leaders, and they can't have that.
Dinsdale Pirannha for CSM 10! ... |

Dr Techenstein Techsalt
SWAMPERIUM
1
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 17:29:00 -
[206] - Quote
Falin Whalen wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:baltec1 wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Probably because the hi-sec wails are drowned out by the constant wailing about hi-sec from Jenn Awhine, Baltec 1 and La Nariz , oh, and that Kaarous person.  Most of the stuff we point out as being broken is being fixed  Democracy works. Sometimes  60% of the time, it works 100% of the time.
And that's still only 20% Dust merc- TechMechMeds, logistics
Eve legion ftw
Dust scum think they can dominate legion lol |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18195
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 17:30:00 -
[207] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:Wow, I didn't know 'tithe' was English word for that "pay your master 1/10th of your earnings" thing. Live and learn, live and learn... Technically the Goons tax rates are actually a tithe and a half, as they're set at 15%.
Never go full Ripard |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11332
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 17:33:00 -
[208] - Quote
Jaxon Grylls wrote:baltec1 wrote:We talk to people the same way they talk to us. Then claim the moral high ground and refuse to indulge in such activities. Or could it be that you really enjoy all the angst and dislike? Just like Millwall football club supporters. They have a chant "Everybody hates us, we don't care." I suspect that deep down they do care. Same with you.
We care about this game to shoot down all of the terrible ideas some people have. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
854
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 17:40:00 -
[209] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:King Fu Hostile wrote:Dinsdale Piranha wrote:More like the removal of all loot from missions, and the buffing of the Incursion rats, making the sites take longer to finish. these are pretty good suggestions mate It is not like I am giving the CSM ideas. These directives, and more, have already delivered to the CCP dev's. Like I have said before, every pilot generating PvE income in high sec is someone not paying a tithe to the cartel leaders, and they can't have that. Just wait until Level 4 missions get removed from high sec. The crying will be...breathtaking.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
441
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 17:40:00 -
[210] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: We care about this game to shoot down all of the terrible ideas some people have.
Even if it means showing up at thier house and beating them with a ball bat. j/k
However, it's the ideas that are only terrible to some play styles and good for others that are the subject of concern. Even the gradual approach to doing away with highsec is a net loss for CCP, but many goons seem to support it anyway. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
854
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 17:42:00 -
[211] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Even the gradual approach to doing away with highsec is a net loss for CCP This is inaccurate.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18196
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 17:46:00 -
[212] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Even the gradual approach to doing away with highsec is a net loss for CCP This is inaccurate. We can't let the truth get in the way of a Goons (GrrGäó) are CCP conspiracy
Never go full Ripard |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10635
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 17:53:00 -
[213] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:4. And then, the next body blow to high sec, Incursion and mission income hammered in some way. I always believed it would just be some across the board nerf to bounties, but I see now that it will be more insidious. More like the removal of all loot from missions, and the buffing of the Incursion rats, making the sites take longer to finish.
so the nullsec ~cartels~ are asking that PvE is made more challenging
how cruel Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2334
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 18:05:00 -
[214] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Jaxon Grylls wrote:baltec1 wrote:We talk to people the same way they talk to us. Then claim the moral high ground and refuse to indulge in such activities. Or could it be that you really enjoy all the angst and dislike? Just like Millwall football club supporters. They have a chant "Everybody hates us, we don't care." I suspect that deep down they do care. Same with you. We care about this game to shoot down all of the terrible ideas some people have.
Does your foot hurt?
Sorry, could not resist the obvious rejoinder  This is not a signature. |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1107
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 18:07:00 -
[215] - Quote
When did this degenerate into another Grr Gons thread?
and why?
You have a council, find the man or woman who will represent you the best. Contact them ask them questions. How they reply, how they listen . . . THAT is what is important.
Not what a select few of trolls in this thread are doing.
Might as well say I am 'fighting for the removal of complexes and escalations from null and wormhole space'* as they are only to be PvP. All PvE activities must be in highsec, right? right? Low only kind of counts so I guess they can have some things.
No
Wild death of any section of space is not what the council is for. Sorry, I wish I could make you all tinfoil hats so you could protect yourselves.
Back to the council composition.
What part of space do you think is missed in representation? Or did we finally manage to get diversity?
m
* - I am not fighting to make massive changes to remove parts of the game Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2334
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 18:11:00 -
[216] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:King Fu Hostile wrote:Dinsdale Piranha wrote:More like the removal of all loot from missions, and the buffing of the Incursion rats, making the sites take longer to finish. these are pretty good suggestions mate It is not like I am giving the CSM ideas. These directives, and more, have already delivered to the CCP dev's. Like I have said before, every pilot generating PvE income in high sec is someone not paying a tithe to the cartel leaders, and they can't have that. Just wait until Level 4 missions get removed from high sec. The crying will be...breathtaking.
Whatever will the null-sec alts do if it should happen?
Look chaps, no matter how often you spam the forums with ideas you want CCP to implement to create your version of Eve Online, you know that CCP ignore your rants against hi-sec as much as we find them amusing. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2334
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 18:12:00 -
[217] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:When did this degenerate into another Grr Gons thread?
and why?
You have a council, find the man or woman who will represent you the best. Contact them ask them questions. How they reply, how they listen . . . THAT is what is important.
Not what a select few of trolls in this thread are doing.
Might as well say I am 'fighting for the removal of complexes and escalations from null and wormhole space'* as they are only to be PvP. All PvE activities must be in highsec, right? right? Low only kind of counts so I guess they can have some things.
No
Wild death of any section of space is not what the council is for. Sorry, I wish I could make you all tinfoil hats so you could protect yourselves.
Back to the council composition.
What part of space do you think is missed in representation? Or did we finally manage to get diversity?
m
* - I am not fighting to make massive changes to remove parts of the game
If the goons stop spamming the forums, I for one, promise to stop making fun of them. This is not a signature. |

FEARNAUGHT O'BREQ
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 18:23:00 -
[218] - Quote
Congratulations to all those that made it onto the CSM9. Hope you have a good & productive year. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2240
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 18:39:00 -
[219] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:La Nariz wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Andski wrote:Dalloway Jones wrote:So the people who claim that high sec should be wiped out are the same people who come to the forums and cry when a cloaked ship is sitting in a system all day, right? hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense. If we don't communicate down on your level you won't understand what we're saying. Dear La Nariz...your response says more about you than I would wish to say whilst staying within the forum rules really... On the bright side, it is great that really young folk like you play Eve, it helps to ensure the game has a future if you stick with it. Take care.
Another example of terrible highsec people "what you do in this video game means you're a bad person in real life." For every one of those I've received I receive at least three death threats over my antics. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Dalloway Jones
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
236
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 18:40:00 -
[220] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:I Have 18Accounts wrote: This battle in your minds where all us "pubbies" gather around plotting for your destruction is just that; a battle in your minds.
Except for: Insurance nerfs. Concord buffs. Barge buffs. Both Crimewatch. MTU "bug" fix. And that's just in the last couple of years. Writing's on the wall, dude.
All of these changes make perfect sense.
For example when a terrorist organization decides to take assassinate miners wouldn't it make sense for the corporations that build mining barges to start making safer options, for insurance companies to realize they are losing money on suicide ganks and stop making payouts, for Concord to offer better protection?
It is just the NPC's reacting to the sandbox and is pretty legitimate.
The people who whine about these changes are just as bad as the people who whine about suicide gankers in general or the grrrgoons folks. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2240
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 18:50:00 -
[221] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:baltec1 wrote: We care about this game to shoot down all of the terrible ideas some people have.
Even if it means showing up at thier house and beating them with a ball bat. j/kHowever, it's the ideas that are only terrible to some play styles and good for others that are the subject of concern. Even the gradual approach to doing away with highsec is a net loss for CCP, but many goons seem to support it anyway.
Yep I've had that threat tossed at me over an awox before. You highsec pubbies need to keep the rage and anger focused in-game.
E: Also the grand highsec pubbie rapture you all like to threaten us with will never happen. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18201
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 18:57:00 -
[222] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:baltec1 wrote: We care about this game to shoot down all of the terrible ideas some people have.
Even if it means showing up at thier house and beating them with a ball bat. j/kHowever, it's the ideas that are only terrible to some play styles and good for others that are the subject of concern. Even the gradual approach to doing away with highsec is a net loss for CCP, but many goons seem to support it anyway. Yep I've had that threat tossed at me over an awox before. You highsec pubbies need to keep the rage and anger focused in-game. E: Also the grand highsec pubbie rapture you all like to threaten us with will never happen. Strange how it's the so called peaceful players who issue all the threats of violence and retribution outside of the game isn't it?
Never go full Ripard |

Marsha Mallow
486
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 19:01:00 -
[223] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If the goons stop spamming the forums, I for one, promise to stop making fun of them. They're not actually derailing, some of them are making very valid points. A few of us are making fun of everybody (and ourselves).
There should be a way to entirely block corp/alliance from view on the forums so people - who are clearly incapable of doing so at the moment - can respond to the content of posts rather than crying about the loyalties of the poster.
I suppose that would take a lot of the fun out of the name calling though.
Mike Azariah wrote:When did this degenerate into another Grr Gons thread?
and why? We're working on a "how fast can we Grr" policy, it's like a forum minigame. Or how fast someone can insert the phrase "pubbie rapture" / "nullsec cartel propagandists". Extra points are awarded if IB4Dinsdale.
Mike Azariah wrote:What part of space do you think is missed in representation? Or did we finally manage to get diversity? Space looks well covered, but there might be some playstyles missing. Are there any Codies on there yet? Scammers might be under-represented. And WiS fans. Role-players. Ho hum. Need to make a list. TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2241
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 19:20:00 -
[224] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:La Nariz wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:baltec1 wrote: We care about this game to shoot down all of the terrible ideas some people have.
Even if it means showing up at thier house and beating them with a ball bat. j/kHowever, it's the ideas that are only terrible to some play styles and good for others that are the subject of concern. Even the gradual approach to doing away with highsec is a net loss for CCP, but many goons seem to support it anyway. Yep I've had that threat tossed at me over an awox before. You highsec pubbies need to keep the rage and anger focused in-game. E: Also the grand highsec pubbie rapture you all like to threaten us with will never happen. Strange how it's the so called peaceful players who issue all the threats of violence and retribution outside of the game isn't it?
Pretty much, I don't understand what's so hard about drawing a line between real life and the game. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2918
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 19:22:00 -
[225] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:When did this degenerate into another Grr Gons thread?
and why?
You have a council, find the man or woman who will represent you the best. Contact them ask them questions. How they reply, how they listen . . . THAT is what is important.
Not what a select few of trolls in this thread are doing.
Might as well say I am 'fighting for the removal of complexes and escalations from null and wormhole space'* as they are only to be PvP. All PvE activities must be in highsec, right? right? Low only kind of counts so I guess they can have some things.
No
Wild death of any section of space is not what the council is for. Sorry, I wish I could make you all tinfoil hats so you could protect yourselves.
Back to the council composition.
What part of space do you think is missed in representation? Or did we finally manage to get diversity?
m
* - I am not fighting to make massive changes to remove parts of the game
I should have qualified my statement. The CSM, dominated by the cartels, was extremely effective in their agenda.
Any resistance by the CSM members that supposedly were championing the high sec casual playstyle was either totally ignored or did not exist in the first place. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
1843
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 19:29:00 -
[226] - Quote
Hey anyone is better than dariusIII There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21555
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 19:38:00 -
[227] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:This is what it all boils down to. On one side we have the libertarians, who adore Eve because it is their twisted vision of what their real world utopia is. On the other side, you have the sane, moral, compassionate people, who are horrified by the distillation into a game of all that is wrong with humanity. You belong to the former group, I take it, since nothing you've ever said comes off as sane, moral, or compassionate?
Quote:ike I have said before, every pilot generating PvE income in high sec is someone not paying a tithe to the cartel leaders, and they can't have that. How do you square that with all the pilots in highsec that, by mere existence, are handing over money to nullsec? Or with all the pilots in null who don't tithe anything to any kind of cartel leader?
Quote:I should have qualified my statement. The CSM, dominated by the cartels, was extremely effective in their agenda. How do you square this with the very slow alteration of moon goo, with the complete lack of sovereignty revamps, with the vey tame industry revamp in null, with the huge buffs to highsec, with the nerfs to power projection, and the severe lack of progress on the 5-year plan for null? If the CSM, dominated by these mythical cartels, were so extremely effective, how come nothing they have been asking for has happened?
Oh, and above all, if the cartels are as effective and powerful as you want them to be, how come you are still here? If what you say is true, you have no say in the matterGǪ and yet, here you are, vomiting up all kinds of incoherent nonsense and no-one is stopping you. It doesn't seem to match your claims, now does it? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Marsha Mallow
486
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 19:42:00 -
[228] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I should have qualified my statement. The CSM, dominated by the cartels, was extremely effective in their agenda.
Any resistance by the CSM members that supposedly were championing the high sec casual playstyle was either totally ignored or did not exist in the first place. So put a highsec candidate up to uphold your playstyle. Nobody is forcing you to run, just support another person.
Or is organising a bloc vote amongst selfish, whiny little zombies commited to dumbing down everything so they can pump out Officer fit Golem lossmails just too much like hard work.
You seriously insult the credibility of both CCP and the CSM on so many levels and yet you remain ungagged. Kind of undermines your stance, wouldn't you say? TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1468
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 19:55:00 -
[229] - Quote
Andski wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:4. And then, the next body blow to high sec, Incursion and mission income hammered in some way. I always believed it would just be some across the board nerf to bounties, but I see now that it will be more insidious. More like the removal of all loot from missions, and the buffing of the Incursion rats, making the sites take longer to finish. so the nullsec ~cartels~ are asking that PvE is made more challenging ... in empire
not in 0.0 sec itself The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
442
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 20:41:00 -
[230] - Quote
Andski wrote:
so the nullsec ~cartels~ are asking that PvE is made more challenging
For everyone BUT them.
[Edit: damn, ninja'd.]
Rhes wrote: This is inaccurate.
Fewer subs is not a net loss for CCP? So, you opening extra alts to cover it?
While I think Dinsdale's numbers are off by an order of magnitude, he's not entirely wrong.
The fewer playstyles Eve caters to, the fewer long term players it will have. This is MMO Design 101. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
858
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 20:55:00 -
[231] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Fewer subs is not a net loss for CCP? So, you opening extra alts to cover it?
While I think Dinsdale's numbers are off by an order of magnitude, he's not entirely wrong.
The fewer playstyles Eve caters to, the fewer long term players it will have. This is MMO Design 101. You are wrong because you assume fewer people in highsec means fewer people in the game as a whole. When was the last time a major news organization wrote a story about highsec pubbies running missions or mining?
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2241
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 21:14:00 -
[232] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Andski wrote:
so the nullsec ~cartels~ are asking that PvE is made more challenging
For everyone BUT them. [Edit: damn, ninja'd.] Rhes wrote: This is inaccurate.
Fewer subs is not a net loss for CCP? So, you opening extra alts to cover it? While I think Dinsdale's numbers are off by an order of magnitude, he's not entirely wrong. The fewer playstyles Eve caters to, the fewer long term players it will have. This is MMO Design 101.
Its inaccurate because it relies on the myth of the "highsec pubbie rapture" as proof. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2241
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 21:18:00 -
[233] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote: What's happened is absolutely disgusting. It's an insult to the entire community and is clearly the work a person who believes that behavior in a virtual world is a valid reason to make a real life personal attack on someone, and deface public property.
Figure I should leave this here for the highsec crowd. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Enaris Kerle
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
98
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 21:20:00 -
[234] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Andski wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:4. And then, the next body blow to high sec, Incursion and mission income hammered in some way. I always believed it would just be some across the board nerf to bounties, but I see now that it will be more insidious. More like the removal of all loot from missions, and the buffing of the Incursion rats, making the sites take longer to finish. so the nullsec ~cartels~ are asking that PvE is made more challenging ... in empire not in 0.0 sec itself there are missions and incursions in 0.0 too you know Gallente born and raised, and tutored as a pleasure slave and courtesan to the exotic tastes of the Amarri court. Jade's career veered violently off course when a diplomatic envoy's transport was blown to pieces in mysterious circumstances and she was rescued from the escape pods by the enigmatic genetic mastermind Athule Snanm. |

Dalloway Jones
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
236
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 21:45:00 -
[235] - Quote
For the "OMG High Sec is being nerfed into the ground" crowd I kind of wonder what is so bad about nerfs to high sec income?
And count me as someone who has lived almost all of my game life in high sec but hope to go hang out in null soon just for a change.
I mean it isn't like we lose a ton of ships. What do we need all the money for? OK I guess PLEX prices are crazy high but are that many high sec carebears only able to play the game via PLEX? |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3063
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 21:57:00 -
[236] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:The fewer playstyles Eve caters to, the fewer long term players it will have. This is MMO Design 101. Can you still get a refund on that course? Because that's some serious hogwash right there. Eve fills a narrower niche than most, but they all have one. The history of MMOs that have tried to change their core game to appeal to a larger audience is checkered with failure, why do you people still keep insisting Eve needs to do this, despite it being the only MMO with a continuously growing playerbase?
You're all trying to cook up a problem that doesn't exist, so that your proposed solutions have something to fix. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3063
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 22:00:00 -
[237] - Quote
Dalloway Jones wrote:I mean it isn't like we lose a ton of ships. What do we need all the money for? OK I guess PLEX prices are crazy high but are that many high sec carebears only able to play the game via PLEX? They need the money to fly better ships, to make more money, to fly better ships! A lot still think they're doing this to "get ready" to PVP "one day" but most have dropped this and have deluded themselves into thinking they started playing Eve to shoot the same red crosses every day, and will defend this vigourously with "don't tell me how to play" defences.
I'm not sure how you look at any of the Eve promo material, and conclude "there's a game which is all about doing mindless PVE on my own and not interacting with anyone! Let's subscribe and yell at people for playing it the way I see in the trailers", but it seems to happen a lot.
(The reality is they joined Eve because HOLY **** SPACE BATTLES LOOK AMAZING but then got caught in the above loop and never concluded they are ready. CCP have said themselves people not leaving highsec is a strong indicator that they will quit the game from boredom.) "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3063
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 22:05:00 -
[238] - Quote
FYI if you are wondering why a CSM is important, it's to cut through the noise as evident in this thread, and help deliver a signal to CCP.
In the past 3 years they have been doing a very good job of this. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11337
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 22:46:00 -
[239] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:baltec1 wrote: We care about this game to shoot down all of the terrible ideas some people have.
Even if it means showing up at thier house and beating them with a ball bat. j/k However, it's the ideas that are only terrible to some play styles and good for others that are the subject of concern. Even the gradual approach to doing away with highsec is a net loss for CCP, but many goons seem to support it anyway.
We don't support such a thing. For one, it would remove suicide ganking from the game. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Pubbie Spy
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 23:05:00 -
[240] - Quote
Tippia wrote:How do you square this with the very slow alteration of moon goo, with the nerfs to individual nullsec income, with the complete lack of sovereignty revamps, with the vey tame industry revamp in null, with the huge buffs to highsec, with the nerfs to power projection, and the severe lack of progress on the 5-year plan for null? If the CSM, dominated by these mythical cartels, were so extremely effective, how come nothing they have been asking for has happened?
Oh, and above all, if the cartels are as effective and powerful as you want them to be, how come you are still here? If what you say is true, you have no say in the matterGǪ and yet, here you are, vomiting up all kinds of incoherent nonsense and no-one is stopping you. It doesn't seem to match your claims, now does it?
Don't let facts get in the way of a good goonspiracy!
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: On one side we have the libertarians, who adore Eve because it is their twisted vision of what their real world utopia is. On the other side, you have the sane, moral, compassionate people, who are horrified by the distillation into a game of all that is wrong with humanity.
Yeah, personal freedom is just so evil, am I right? Or should we only have the freedom to choose if we choose correctly?
Argh stop making me agree with Dinsdale, libertarianism is even dumber than internet spaceships (as goons found out when we tried to combine space libertarianism with internet spaceships; we ended up switching to space communism instead),
I'm sorry, I meant:
All hail Ayn Rand, long live Maggie Thatcher, bow before Saint Reagan the Unconquered Restorer of the Free World. HERO is on the right path under the wise guidance of TEST, and anyway every newbee friendly ~internet spaceship guilde~ should definitely implement space libertarianism, especially if they want to topple goons, honest, guys!
Anyone want to join my new alliance Fountainhead [ATLAS]?
|

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
1372
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 23:26:00 -
[241] - Quote
Dalloway Jones wrote:For the "OMG High Sec is being nerfed into the ground" crowd I kind of wonder what is so bad about nerfs to high sec income?
And count me as someone who has lived almost all of my game life in high sec but hope to go hang out in null soon just for a change.
I mean it isn't like we lose a ton of ships. What do we need all the money for? OK I guess PLEX prices are crazy high but are that many high sec carebears only able to play the game via PLEX?
I fly in all areas of eve, I don't mind nerfs to high sec even though I resupply there, I don't mind any changes to the game if they are done for game balance reasons, I do mind however if changes really are being driven by minority interest groups in null that are over represented at the csm.
Proof of this is thin on the ground however. Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
444
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 23:40:00 -
[242] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:The fewer playstyles Eve caters to, the fewer long term players it will have. This is MMO Design 101. Can you still get a refund on that course? Because that's some serious hogwash right there. Eve fills a narrower niche than most, but they all have one. The history of MMOs that have tried to change their core game to appeal to a larger audience is checkered with failure, why do you people still keep insisting Eve needs to do this, despite it being the only MMO with a continuously growing playerbase? You're all trying to cook up a problem that doesn't exist, so that your proposed solutions have something to fix.
One: the games that tried to appeal to more players might be checkered with failure, but the ones that reduced the number of viable play-styles are paved with it.
Two: Really? A continuously growing playerbase you say?
http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility
Funny, Chribba's New Born Player graph over at Eve Offline shows that new character creation on this server is, on average, on the down slope (there are however spikes when second accounts get discounts). Concurrency is at it's lowest point since Incarna, and before that we have to go all the way back to 08. Those are NOT signs of 'growth'.
While Chribba is a high seccer, I'm willing to be his numbers are dead on.
|

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2242
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 01:31:00 -
[243] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:The fewer playstyles Eve caters to, the fewer long term players it will have. This is MMO Design 101. Can you still get a refund on that course? Because that's some serious hogwash right there. Eve fills a narrower niche than most, but they all have one. The history of MMOs that have tried to change their core game to appeal to a larger audience is checkered with failure, why do you people still keep insisting Eve needs to do this, despite it being the only MMO with a continuously growing playerbase? You're all trying to cook up a problem that doesn't exist, so that your proposed solutions have something to fix. One: the games that tried to appeal to more players might be checkered with failure, but the ones that reduced the number of viable play-styles are paved with it. Two: Really? A continuously growing playerbase you say? http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquilityFunny, Chribba's New Born Player graph over at Eve Offline shows that new character creation on this server is, on average, on the down slope (there are however spikes when second accounts get discounts). Concurrency is at it's lowest point since Incarna, and before that we have to go all the way back to 08. Those are NOT signs of 'growth'. While Chribba is a high seccer, I'm willing to be his numbers are dead on.
Yet you've cited nothing that proves any of your points. You know what would draw in new players by the dozens? Nerfing highsec. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5809
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 01:41:00 -
[244] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote: One: the games that tried to appeal to more players might be checkered with failure, but the ones that reduced the number of viable play-styles are paved with it.
Lol, surely you have a few examples of that, right? You know, of all those games that failed because they did not go lowest common denominator?
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Dalloway Jones
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
236
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 01:44:00 -
[245] - Quote
That's just silly. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5809
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 01:46:00 -
[246] - Quote
Pubbie Spy wrote: Argh stop making me agree with Dinsdale, libertarianism is even dumber than internet spaceships (as goons found out when we tried to combine space libertarianism with internet spaceships; we ended up switching to space communism instead),
I'm sorry, I meant:
All hail Ayn Rand, long live Maggie Thatcher, bow before Saint Reagan the Unconquered Restorer of the Free World. HERO is on the right path under the wise guidance of TEST, and anyway every newbee friendly ~internet spaceship guilde~ should definitely implement space libertarianism, especially if they want to topple goons, honest, guys!
Anyone want to join my new alliance Fountainhead [ATLAS]?
Nothing of the sort, to be honest.
I am merely arguing against his thought crime mentality. Were it up to him, all of the "sane, moral, compassionate people" would be able to have any playstyle with an off chance of causing badfeels banned from the game, and we'd all be merrily grinding away to make the green numbers bigger.
Well, I reject that carebear horseshit. He can throw around labels all he wants but he can go jump in a lake if he thinks he gets to legislate his twisted version of morality into a videogame. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3181
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 01:55:00 -
[247] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:While Chribba is a high seccer, I'm willing to be his numbers are dead on. they're not. they're just the characters eveboard has discovered
... and eve is still growing |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
445
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 02:15:00 -
[248] - Quote
La Nariz wrote: You know what would draw in new players by the dozens? Nerfing highsec.
*sigh*
Ok, I'll bite, how did you come to that conclusion?
I can point to high sec population and concurrency numbers to support my theory that doing away with high sec, either nerfing it into the ground or flat out eliminating it, will harm EvE's viability as a source of profit for CCP.
Assuming that only ten percent (though likely higher) of high sec players actually quit, that's still a serious financial hit.
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: I'm the center of the universe and anyone that disagrees with me is obviously wrong because this game is about ME and what I WANT.
Fixed. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5811
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 02:18:00 -
[249] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:La Nariz wrote: You know what would draw in new players by the dozens? Nerfing highsec.
*sigh* Ok, I'll bite, how did you come to that conclusion? I can point to high sec population and concurrency numbers to support my theory that doing away with high sec, either nerfing it into the ground or flat out eliminating it, will harm EvE's viability as a source of profit for CCP. Assuming that only ten percent (though likely higher) of high sec players actually quit, that's still a serious financial hit.
I can tell you how he came to that conclusion.
Sub numbers spiked after the battle of BR-5. We had rookie systems in TiDi for goodness sakes.
Sub numbers have never spiked from mining. Or mission running. Or any of the mindless tasks of highsec.
One of these is clearly drawing in new players. One is not.
When was the last time you heard a brand new player say "Man, I can't wait to munch on some asteroids all day long just like a bot!"? "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3181
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 02:26:00 -
[250] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:I can point to high sec population and concurrency numbers to support my theory that doing away with high sec, either nerfing it into the ground or flat out eliminating it, will harm EvE's viability as a source of profit for CCP. no you can't. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
445
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 02:51:00 -
[251] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
I can tell you how he came to that conclusion.
Sub numbers spiked after the battle of BR-5. We had rookie systems in TiDi for goodness sakes.
Sub numbers have never spiked from mining. Or mission running. Or any of the mindless tasks of highsec.
One of these is clearly drawing in new players. One is not.
You'll have to point me to where you're getting your sub numbers.
We saw a good spike following each release, but then a deep pit as concurrency dropped again. Your spike following B-R5 was immediately followed by concurrency numbers in free fall when people didn't stay. In two months average concurrency dropped from 31k to 25k. Right now we're enjoying our usual fanfest spike, but this day, last year, we had our highest of all time. This year we're slightly better than half that.
What's drawing people in is not strictly speaking, PvP. It's the impression that super awesome stuff happens all the time in EvE.
Unfortunately, event like that are actually once in a blue moon. It generates good press, but people are not staying. Goons have been too successful at making things 'unfun'. You like to bring up mining, and yes it sucks ass, I did it to keep players in ships back in Fountain, and you would not believe the bitching that PvPers do when they have to strap on a mining laser and help replace the battleships they lost. But that's not what the real problem is.
Eve promises Epic and does not deliver most days. The best way to fix this would be to overhaul the boring stuff. Make missions procedurally generated. Throw out mining as currently exists. There are a lot of things that can be done.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10654
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 03:03:00 -
[252] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Make missions procedurally generated.
This, a million times.
Imagine the forum rage from Dinsdale & co. when missions are no longer predictable and easy to blitz. It will be glorious Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
445
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 03:10:00 -
[253] - Quote
Andski wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Make missions procedurally generated. This, a million times. Imagine the forum rage from Dinsdale & co. when missions are no longer predictable and easy to blitz. It will be glorious
I seriously doubt it, actually, as long as they were done in a way that made them fun. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10654
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 03:12:00 -
[254] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:I seriously doubt it, actually, as long as they were done in a way that made them fun.
People want mission running to be about shooting triggers, ignoring everything else and collecting a reward as quickly as possible because isk/hr
Anything that requires them to be "engaged" and "playing the game" is antithetical to the goal of increasing their cashouts Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2243
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 03:20:00 -
[255] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:La Nariz wrote: You know what would draw in new players by the dozens? Nerfing highsec.
*sigh* Ok, I'll bite, how did you come to that conclusion? I can point to high sec population and concurrency numbers to support my theory that doing away with high sec, either nerfing it into the ground or flat out eliminating it, will harm EvE's viability as a source of profit for CCP. Assuming that only ten percent (though likely higher) of high sec players actually quit, that's still a serious financial hit. Kaarous Aldurald wrote: I'm the center of the universe and anyone that disagrees with me is obviously wrong because this game is about ME and what I WANT.
Fixed.
On top of the publicly viewable research I've done on the topic, highsec strangles and stagnates the game. It produces no outside publicity like nullsec does and bubble wraps new players potentially ruining their experience with the game. Top it all off with the high end solo game play of highsec being grinding. Nerfing highsec is good for EVE.
E: You're still hanging on the myth of the highsec pubbie rapture, its completely unfounded and untrue. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1328
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 03:24:00 -
[256] - Quote
Andski wrote:
People want mission running to be about shooting triggers, ignoring everything else and collecting a reward as quickly as possible because isk/hr
Anything that requires them to be "engaged" and "playing the game" is antithetical to the goal of increasing their cashouts
Please don't confuse mission farmers who are a tiny minority with casual players, most of whom also like the idea of low & null but do not have the time to invest that most null corps & alliances demand of their player base, so play in high sec. |

Dalloway Jones
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
236
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 03:41:00 -
[257] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:La Nariz wrote: You know what would draw in new players by the dozens? Nerfing highsec.
*sigh* Ok, I'll bite, how did you come to that conclusion? I can point to high sec population and concurrency numbers to support my theory that doing away with high sec, either nerfing it into the ground or flat out eliminating it, will harm EvE's viability as a source of profit for CCP. Assuming that only ten percent (though likely higher) of high sec players actually quit, that's still a serious financial hit. I can tell you how he came to that conclusion. Sub numbers spiked after the battle of BR-5. We had rookie systems in TiDi for goodness sakes. Sub numbers have never spiked from mining. Or mission running. Or any of the mindless tasks of highsec. One of these is clearly drawing in new players. One is not. When was the last time you heard a brand new player say "Man, I can't wait to munch on some asteroids all day long just like a bot!"?
So what is it you want exactly? For high sec and all forms of mission running and mining play style to go away and those people to leave the game?
Or do you just want CCP to pay more attention to the game mechanics of null sec and make game improvements to benefit you?
Because if it is the latter I am fine with that. CCP has obviously fallen behind in providing new interesting content for null if they have time to suicide gank miners all day.
If it is the former considering the fact that CCP seems to want almost everything in the game to be player made I am not sure you are going to get what you want. |

Arancar Australis
Dead Sun Rising Enterprises
98
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 04:12:00 -
[258] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:I Have 18Accounts wrote:This battle in your minds where all us "pubbies" gather around plotting for your destruction is just that; a battle in your minds. I specifically stated that you are neither willing nor able to "plot" - did you read my post? If you're denying there's lots of anti-goon hatred on here, and elsewhere, let me know how many examples I need to quote. You would have to have some serious reading comprehension issues to have not seen them before, mind. Try not to mistake laughing at goons in the forums with goons for anti-goon hatred. Still, if you want to think folk hate the goons, don't let me stop you.
Funny how people equate laughing at a person as hating them.
Raises the new question of ...How do comedians deal with all the hatred they receive from an audience each performance? I feel for them  |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
446
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 04:12:00 -
[259] - Quote
La Nariz wrote: On top of the publicly viewable research I've done on the topic, highsec strangles and stagnates the game.
When I looked the only thing I found was you had done some numbers on ratting profits. Which look legit. Your other assertions don't seem to have any proof. You call the High Sec Rapture (I love that title) a myth, but supposedly so are evolution, gravity, and climate change.
If you want to say 'Eve is fine' I can point to numbers that show otherwise. If you want to argue that changing high sec in serious, fundamental ways won't adversely effect CCPs income, consider the loss of revenue from high sec miners unsubbing. Even if they didn't close all their accounts, we're still looking at a sizable drop. |

Arancar Australis
Dead Sun Rising Enterprises
98
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 04:25:00 -
[260] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:La Nariz wrote: You know what would draw in new players by the dozens? Nerfing highsec.
*sigh* Ok, I'll bite, how did you come to that conclusion? I can point to high sec population and concurrency numbers to support my theory that doing away with high sec, either nerfing it into the ground or flat out eliminating it, will harm EvE's viability as a source of profit for CCP. Assuming that only ten percent (though likely higher) of high sec players actually quit, that's still a serious financial hit. I can tell you how he came to that conclusion. Sub numbers spiked after the battle of BR-5. We had rookie systems in TiDi for goodness sakes. Sub numbers have never spiked from mining. Or mission running. Or any of the mindless tasks of highsec. One of these is clearly drawing in new players. One is not. When was the last time you heard a brand new player say "Man, I can't wait to munch on some asteroids all day long just like a bot!"?
Funnily enough I joined this game because of the potential to be anything I wanted to be in this game. It is one of the few games where I am not hornshoed into being just a PVP orientated player. I also joined knowing that with such freedom available to me, it was available to others to pursue their own agendas as well.
It takes all types to make this game.
Any way that can be used to introduce people to this game that we love to hate or hate to love, should be encouraged. Yes BR-5 was a great way to make people aware of the game, but it would be interesting to see the headlines of those articles outside of gaming reported more about the "Real Life" value rather than because of the people involved. As well, how many of those new subs have stayed in the game? |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2243
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 05:14:00 -
[261] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:La Nariz wrote: On top of the publicly viewable research I've done on the topic, highsec strangles and stagnates the game.
When I looked the only thing I found was you had done some numbers on ratting profits. Which look legit. Your other assertions don't seem to have any proof. You call the High Sec Rapture (I love that title) a myth, but supposedly so are evolution, gravity, and climate change. If you want to say 'Eve is fine' I can point to numbers that show otherwise. If you want to argue that changing high sec in serious, fundamental ways won't adversely effect CCPs income, consider the loss of revenue from high sec miners unsubbing. Even if they didn't close all their accounts, we're still looking at a sizable drop.
Keep looking there's been publicly viewable research on everything I've stated. I'm glad you like the title. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2336
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 05:56:00 -
[262] - Quote
To the anti hi-sec folk.
Players do not have to play in hi-sec, yet they choose of their own free will to do so. In fact the majority of players choose to play in hi-sec.
Anti hi-sec folk may argue that this is because hi-sec is safer and easier to earn isk in than null-sec. I agree with them, (for the most part) the problem the anti hi-sec folk have is that the majority of players seem to like this arrangement.
Some of the null-sec folk appear to seriously believe that if CCP did away with hi-sec entirely that subs to the game would increase would increase, what evidence they have for this eludes me completely.
I am of the opinion that we all play Eve Online and that where we choose to do so is immaterial. Each to their own and all that.
Anti hi-sec folk are just going to have to come to terms with the fact that CCP has no intentions of doing away with hi-sec, not today, not tomorrow, not ever.
This is not a signature. |

Tauranon
Weeesearch Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
957
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 06:07:00 -
[263] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:La Nariz wrote: On top of the publicly viewable research I've done on the topic, highsec strangles and stagnates the game.
When I looked the only thing I found was you had done some numbers on ratting profits. Which look legit. Your other assertions don't seem to have any proof. You call the High Sec Rapture (I love that title) a myth, but supposedly so are evolution, gravity, and climate change. If you want to say 'Eve is fine' I can point to numbers that show otherwise. If you want to argue that changing high sec in serious, fundamental ways won't adversely effect CCPs income, consider the loss of revenue from high sec miners unsubbing. Even if they didn't close all their accounts, we're still looking at a sizable drop.
Its not abundantly clear that people buy more or less plexes if the value of plexes fall because less isboxing miners are subbed. If plexes were worth 5b each, less people would buy plexes, due to only needing to sell one, so realistically that debate centers around a curve that is bad at either end for CCP and a sweet spot, and I'm going to have to say that its difficult for any player to have insight into the sweet spot, including you.
I'll pop up my dominix mission running times and received LP again one of these days for you, but basically rejecting the worst half a dozen missions pretty much sits it at 60m/hr on 1000 conversion navy LP and 100m/hr on Sisters LP conversion. That is a T1 battleship taking objectively tiny risks.
I also have a spreadsheet with 900+ nullsec anomoly runs, so I know the commander rates and escalation rates and the pattern for estimating the ones I haven't sampled sufficiently yet, which eliminates concerns with Nariz's stats. I can outearn him since I'm a dedicated PVE player, but that actually requires information that is -not- provided in game, and is -currently unpublished-, and more time than I'd expect Nariz has to even out some pretty nasty streak effects (sampling anything with 4%, 2% and 1% rates is going to be streaky).
IMO the whole conversation is in limbo in any case because kronos patch has changes impacting fighters. Right now, a carrier struggles to beat a solo T1 battleship on sisters LP and will certainly fail to beat a well piloted marauder.
As it stands, it is not a balanced game, nor is it a game that lays out a proper progression path for users, and its probably a reason why 6 month old mission runners unsub - other steps are seen as unrewarding and they are bored with missions.
|

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2243
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 06:15:00 -
[264] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:To the anti hi-sec folk.
Players do not have to play in hi-sec, yet they choose of their own free will to do so. In fact the majority of players choose to play in hi-sec.
Anti hi-sec folk may argue that this is because hi-sec is safer and easier to earn isk in than null-sec. I agree with them, (for the most part) the problem the anti hi-sec folk have is that the majority of players seem to like this arrangement.
Some of the null-sec folk appear to seriously believe that if CCP did away with hi-sec entirely that subs to the game would increase would increase, what evidence they have for this eludes me completely.
I am of the opinion that we all play Eve Online and that where we choose to do so is immaterial. Each to their own and all that.
Anti hi-sec folk are just going to have to come to terms with the fact that CCP has no intentions of doing away with hi-sec, not today, not tomorrow, not ever.
You have no proof of any of what you said also the game literally forces people to start in highsec. People are being forced into highsec. I know our newbees would be much better off if they could spawn and do their little tutorial in VFK. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11339
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 06:15:00 -
[265] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:To the anti hi-sec folk.
Players do not have to play in hi-sec, yet they choose of their own free will to do so. In fact the majority of players choose to play in hi-sec.
Anti hi-sec folk may argue that this is because hi-sec is safer and easier to earn isk in than null-sec. I agree with them, (for the most part) the problem the anti hi-sec folk have is that the majority of players seem to like this arrangement.
Some of the null-sec folk appear to seriously believe that if CCP did away with hi-sec entirely that subs to the game would increase would increase, what evidence they have for this eludes me completely.
I am of the opinion that we all play Eve Online and that where we choose to do so is immaterial. Each to their own and all that.
Anti hi-sec folk are just going to have to come to terms with the fact that CCP has no intentions of doing away with hi-sec, not today, not tomorrow, not ever.
No we dont think getting rid of highsec is good for the game. We want to get rid of high sec offering the same or better rewards as the higher risk areas of space. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Tauranon
Weeesearch Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
959
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 06:25:00 -
[266] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:To the anti hi-sec folk.
Players do not have to play in hi-sec, yet they choose of their own free will to do so. In fact the majority of players choose to play in hi-sec.
I can absolutely assure you if people thought they could find the maze and do the maze in the same way that they can find a mission and do the mission in highsec, I'd be completely out of the x-type sales business due to everybody farming their own and not buying mine.
The game has some progression holes, the most notable of which is that the leap between highsec mission runner and mission or anomoly farmer elsewhere is just unclear. At least ded 4 farmers can see clear reasons for seeking ded 5s and ded 6s particularly (and seeking ded 6s is why I am where I am now).
Quote:
Anti hi-sec folk may argue that this is because hi-sec is safer and easier to earn isk in than null-sec. I agree with them, (for the most part) the problem the anti hi-sec folk have is that the majority of players seem to like this arrangement.
Some of the null-sec folk appear to seriously believe that if CCP did away with hi-sec entirely that subs to the game would increase would increase, what evidence they have for this eludes me completely.
I am of the opinion that we all play Eve Online and that where we choose to do so is immaterial. Each to their own and all that.
Anti hi-sec folk are just going to have to come to terms with the fact that CCP has no intentions of doing away with hi-sec, not today, not tomorrow, not ever.
Your whole idea that true anti highsec people exist is pretty much wrong. There is skill in evasion, there is skill in keeping my ships, I earn isk on the back of demonstrating that skill amongst people that would like to kill my ships. I also kill peoples ships who fail to demonstrate that in front of me, if it so happens that I planned sufficiently to have the PVP ship available to switch to ( hint number 1, this is a planning and logistics procedure that I happen to perform, which is why I get kills occasionally).
What we do not want, is for absurd game changes that prevent me from needing evasion skills as a PVE player, prevent there being any differentation in results based on skill or planning, and prevent people from being able to legitimately hunt players, which is also a skill.
Hint number 2, hunting other players is fun, and it is objectively more fun than PVE, and I say that as one of the most dedicated PVE players in the game, who has spent 99% + numerous digits of precision of my game time PVEing, and expect to do likewise in the future.
I would be entirely happy if CCP dedicated most of its resources to improving PVE, just so long as clarity around the need to contextualize properly with risk remains, and that highsec fits into a base for preparing to seek reward, instead of being the damn reward in itself.
I put up with the stratios being a highsec derived object, simply because its plainly designed to be a reward seeking object outside of highsec use, but its a long and painful process waiting out its economic distortions.
|

Jaxon Grylls
Institute of Archaeology
94
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 07:36:00 -
[267] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If the goons stop spamming the forums, I for one, promise to stop making fun of them. No, not good enough Josef.
Don't get caught up in the silly games being played here.
This thread is degenerating into a play-ground squabble.
This does no-one any good, only serves to entrench the two camps and will lead inevitably to a lock.
As I advised the Goon representatives, give it a rest.
Post constructively or don't post at all.
Mike Azariah is right. Let's see what this CSM does, before coming out with visions of doom.
|

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
448
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 07:43:00 -
[268] - Quote
Jaxon Grylls wrote:Let's see what this CSM does, before coming out with visions of doom.
After all, visions of doom require the smoking of some seriously heavy stuff, and I have absolutely NO urge to share a bag with the goons. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11342
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 07:50:00 -
[269] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Jaxon Grylls wrote:Let's see what this CSM does, before coming out with visions of doom. After all, visions of doom require the smoking of some seriously heavy stuff, and I have absolutely NO urge to share a bag with the goons.
That's ok, we have more than enough of our own stuff Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Dave Stark
5314
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 07:54:00 -
[270] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:No we dont think getting rid of highsec is good for the game. We want to get rid of high sec offering the same or better rewards as the higher risk areas of space.
confirming high sec having good rewards is why i live there.
why would i go anywhere else when all i'd get for my troubles is more hassle for no extra reward? |

Pubbie Spy
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
44
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 09:22:00 -
[271] - Quote
Tauranon wrote:As it stands, it is not a balanced game, nor is it a game that lays out a proper progression path for users, and its probably a reason why 6 month old mission runners unsub - other steps are seen as unrewarding and they are bored with missions.
Eve is not about ~progression~, since making numbers go up faster with a more expensive ship is just more of the same.
There's a reason the most memorable moments in Eve are not at all related to player SP or how many purple modules your mission running autism chariot has, but about drama and large scale changes in the political landscape of nullsec and giant fights where thousands of people were sufficiently motivated to log in and play internet spaceships together.
Go play WoW or Asteroids (still a better rock shooting game than mining in Eve) if you want PvE.
Jaxon Grylls wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If the goons stop spamming the forums, I for one, promise to stop making fun of them. No, not good enough Josef. Don't get caught up in the silly games being played here. This thread is degenerating into a play-ground squabble. This does no-one any good, only serves to entrench the two camps and will lead inevitably to a lock. As I advised the Goon representatives, give it a rest. Post constructively or don't post at all. Mike Azariah is right. Let's see what this CSM does, before coming out with visions of doom.
Your style
of paragraphs for each sentence
is very readable
and makes your post
much more constructive. |

Tauranon
Weeesearch Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
959
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 09:43:00 -
[272] - Quote
Pubbie Spy wrote:Tauranon wrote:As it stands, it is not a balanced game, nor is it a game that lays out a proper progression path for users, and its probably a reason why 6 month old mission runners unsub - other steps are seen as unrewarding and they are bored with missions.
Eve is not about ~progression~, since making numbers go up faster with a more expensive ship is just more of the same. There's a reason the most memorable moments in Eve are not at all related to player SP or how many purple modules your mission running autism chariot has, but about drama and large scale changes in the political landscape of nullsec and giant fights where thousands of people were sufficiently motivated to log in and play internet spaceships together. Go play WoW or Asteroids (still a better rock shooting game than mining in Eve) if you want PvE.
Almost all of my PVP is in relation to PVE, and that's the way I like it. In order for that to exist, the PVE has to have apparent intrinsic value, and we have to be set to take it off each other. Mission running doesn't produce players that do that.
The progression step, is to progress from missioning in virtual isolation with concord covering your back, to losing the concord and taking of things that other people want to take. That is a progression step for the player and not the character.
oh and I don't own any purple modules. In 7 years I haven't bought one. I've also sold far more blue than I've ever fitted. If I fit a purple, it will because I went and farmed the relevant belts until it dropped, which is also a hallmark of my fitted blue gear.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2337
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 10:37:00 -
[273] - Quote
Pubbie Spy wrote:Tauranon wrote:As it stands, it is not a balanced game, nor is it a game that lays out a proper progression path for users, and its probably a reason why 6 month old mission runners unsub - other steps are seen as unrewarding and they are bored with missions.
Eve is not about ~progression~, since making numbers go up faster with a more expensive ship is just more of the same. There's a reason the most memorable moments in Eve are not at all related to player SP or how many purple modules your mission running autism chariot has, but about drama and large scale changes in the political landscape of nullsec and giant fights where thousands of people were sufficiently motivated to log in and play internet spaceships together. Go play WoW or Asteroids (still a better rock shooting game than mining in Eve) if you want PvE. Jaxon Grylls wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If the goons stop spamming the forums, I for one, promise to stop making fun of them. No, not good enough Josef. Don't get caught up in the silly games being played here. This thread is degenerating into a play-ground squabble. This does no-one any good, only serves to entrench the two camps and will lead inevitably to a lock. As I advised the Goon representatives, give it a rest. Post constructively or don't post at all. Mike Azariah is right. Let's see what this CSM does, before coming out with visions of doom. Your style of paragraphs for each sentence is very readable and makes your post much more constructive.
Thank you good sir 
Glad
to
help This is not a signature. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5820
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 11:31:00 -
[274] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote: You'll have to point me to where you're getting your sub numbers.
That'd be a Dev's twitter feed, where they were laughing about how they had to remap a node to cover one of the rookie systems a few days after BR-5. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3069
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 12:43:00 -
[275] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:La Nariz wrote: On top of the publicly viewable research I've done on the topic, highsec strangles and stagnates the game.
When I looked the only thing I found was you had done some numbers on ratting profits. Which look legit. Your other assertions don't seem to have any proof. You call the High Sec Rapture (I love that title) a myth, but supposedly so are evolution, gravity, and climate change. If you want to say 'Eve is fine' I can point to numbers that show otherwise. If you want to argue that changing high sec in serious, fundamental ways won't adversely effect CCPs income, consider the loss of revenue from high sec miners unsubbing. Even if they didn't close all their accounts, we're still looking at a sizable drop.
CCP's own metrics indicate that people who stick to highsec, are many times more likely to unsub from the game. People who leave highsec are more likely to stay for much longer. Source: CSM minutes.
Highsec makes people leave the game. You can argue that you would lose a proportion of the utterly entrenched if massive changes came in that stopped making perma-highsec life viable, but it's rather like cutting off a rotting toe to save the foot.
The trick isn't to move all development of eve around the carebear-entrenched mindset, but to create a game where people don't get stuck in that rut to begin with. As mentioned, people don't start playing eve because they heard you can min/max saving the damsel 400 times a month, that's a play-style they fall into because other options are too hard to break into.
The reason subs spike after things like BR is because 'HOLY CRAPOLA LOOK AT THOSE BATTLES I WANT TO DO THAT!!" - but then they start the game and everyone they ask tells them to never leave highsec. Then, they leave after a small amount of time. On the contrary, when things like BR happens, our newbie drive goes totally mental, and we retain a very high proportion of these new players, because they aren't bored shitless in highsec, being given advice by carebears.
I've lost count of the number of times I've seen a newbie speak up and ask if they should go exploring lowsec/0.0, only to have a dozen ultra-bears shout them down and tell them its a bad idea, instant death awaits, etc.
Those people should be purged from the game for the benefit of everyone else. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Jaxon Grylls
Institute of Archaeology
95
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 12:55:00 -
[276] - Quote
Pubbie Spy wrote: Your style
of paragraphs for each sentence
is very readable
and makes your post
much more constructive.
Sorry if it offends you.
My eyes are not what they were and I find that single spacing is often hard to read.
So when composing a post I do it in such a manner that is easy for me to proof-read and spell check. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2338
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 13:06:00 -
[277] - Quote
Jaxon Grylls wrote:Pubbie Spy wrote: Your style
of paragraphs for each sentence
is very readable
and makes your post
much more constructive.
Sorry if it offends you. My eyes are not what they were and I find that single spacing is often hard to read. So when composing a post I do it in such a manner that is easy for me to proof-read and spell check.
I was not offended in the least. This is not a signature. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2928
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 13:09:00 -
[278] - Quote
And on another note, another day goes by, no CSM breakdown on the vote. I thought last year it was a couple days after the results were released, but then I checked the 2013 dev blogs. It was actually almost right after.
Let's see what happens on Wednesday, and if we get a vote breakdown. At least one of the bloggers has already implied that the delay means bad news on the subscription size.
And of course, if the subs are down, clearly the best way to regain them is to hammer high sec even more.
Waiting for the leaked directive by the cartels ordering all their serfs to subscribe another alt. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Frying Doom
3645
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 13:18:00 -
[279] - Quote
I must admit, I am starting to wonder if the transparent elections that have always been a there are a thing of the past.
Given the STV voting system they really need to remain transparent.
But then we have not actually even gotten confirmation as to the successful candidates on these forums by CCP. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
1741
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 13:21:00 -
[280] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:But then we have not actually even gotten confirmation as to the successful candidates on these forums by CCP.
So you say big screen announcement with list of CSM 9 members shown by Hilmar at Fanfest is not enough of confirmation for you? I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2928
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 13:34:00 -
[281] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I must admit, I am starting to wonder if the transparent elections that have always been a there are a thing of the past.
Given the STV voting system they really need to remain transparent.
But then we have not actually even gotten confirmation as to the successful candidates on these forums by CCP.
2012: CSM winners released in the keynote, dev blog comes same day. 2013 CSM winners released in the keynote, dev blog comes out hours later. 2014 CSM winners released in the keynote, dev blog comes out...... Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
877
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 14:09:00 -
[282] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:And on another note, another day goes by, no CSM breakdown on the vote. I thought last year it was a couple days after the results were released, but then I checked the 2013 dev blogs. It was actually almost right after.
Let's see what happens on Wednesday, and if we get a vote breakdown. At least one of the bloggers has already implied that the delay means bad news on the subscription size.
And of course, if the subs are down, clearly the best way to regain them is to hammer high sec even more.
Waiting for the leaked directive by the cartels ordering all their serfs to subscribe another alt. Why do you think vote tally has anything to do with subscription numbers?
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Higgs Foton
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
91
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 14:10:00 -
[283] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:[quote=Cygnet Lythanea][quote=La Nariz] Highsec makes people leave the game. You can argue that you would lose a proportion of the utterly entrenched if massive changes came in that stopped making perma-highsec life viable, but it's rather like cutting off a rotting toe to save the foot.
The trick isn't to move all development of eve around the carebear-entrenched mindset, but to create a game where people don't get stuck in that rut to begin with. As mentioned, people don't start playing eve because they heard you can min/max saving the damsel 400 times a month, that's a play-style they fall into because other options are too hard to break into.
The reason subs spike after things like BR is because 'HOLY CRAPOLA LOOK AT THOSE BATTLES I WANT TO DO THAT!!" - but then they start the game and everyone they ask tells them to never leave highsec. Then, they leave after a small amount of time. On the contrary, when things like BR happens, our newbie drive goes totally mental, and we retain a very high proportion of these new players, because they aren't bored shitless in highsec, being given advice by carebears.
I've lost count of the number of times I've seen a newbie speak up and ask if they should go exploring lowsec/0.0, only to have a dozen ultra-bears shout them down and tell them its a bad idea, instant death awaits, etc.
Those people should be purged from the game for the benefit of everyone else.
Many truth's are spoken here. When i was a young capsuleer i went into low sec the second day i played the game, and withing three months i was in null sec. I also heard the carebears in high sec proclaiming "Don't go there! Its dangerous!", but that never stopped me. Sure, i was blown up a couple of times, but i also made HUGE profits. When i now return to high sec to get new skills i always see it as an unending sea of mediocrity and boredom. If advancing in this game is what you want, you need to get to null sec. This is where the big boys who make the headlines play, and this is where you can make a decent profit, be it mining, exploration, ratting or (in the future) industry.
*Snip* Removed trolling part of the post. ISD Ezwal. *Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15320
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 14:44:00 -
[284] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I must admit, I am starting to wonder if the transparent elections that have always been a there are a thing of the past.
Given the STV voting system they really need to remain transparent.
But then we have not actually even gotten confirmation as to the successful candidates on these forums by CCP.
Nobody actually voted. CCP just picked the 14 people they wanted.
Please go about your business in an orderly fashion. You are being watched at all times for your own safety. Subversive activity will not be tolerated. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Aralyn Cormallen
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
385
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 14:46:00 -
[285] - Quote
Higgs Foton wrote:
Many truth's are spoken here. When i was a young capsuleer i went into low sec the second day i played the game, and withing three months i was in null sec. I also heard the carebears in high sec proclaiming "Don't go there! Its dangerous!", but that never stopped me. Sure, i was blown up a couple of times, but i also made HUGE profits. When i now return to high sec to get new skills i always see it as an unending sea of mediocrity and boredom. If advancing in this game is what you want, you need to get to null sec. This is where the big boys who make the headlines play, and this is where you can make a decent profit, be it mining, exploration, ratting or (in the future) industry.
I believe its a problem of the mechanics of the New Player Experience.
Straight out the gate you are presented with a neat stack of missions, and dropped in to a chat channel with the most entrenched players in the game (because players who have at least dipped their toe outside the starter corp drop back in to a different corp, so it is only those who have never left who are there to "advise" new players). So it is not surprising that the starter player drifts in to the highsec missioning lifestyle, either unaware of the alternatives, or aggressively advised not to take them.
I'm not sure there is any sane way to introduce a player to the politics and pvp side of the game right off the bat. I mean, the mission that suggests signing up to fleet war tries that, but paradoxically, it is more often the less aware players who are more likely to accept that offer unknowingly, and accidentally find themselves in fleet war, dead due to ignorance of mechanics, and scared further away from trying to pvp in a structured manner.
The problem is that the only alternatives presented to the player are mining, missioning, and exploring, and of the three, missioning is far more familiar territory to the former themepark dweller coming here from elsewhere. Industry is also presented, but the agonising problem of finding a free line remotely near a newbie system no doubt puts them off that at the outset - hopefully the Industry update will resolve this (there is an idea, tag tutorial Blueprints to exclude them from the price escalation of crowded systems?). Follow that with the blatant falsehoods and misconceptions parrotted in to the newbies ear, and no wonder they never make it in to the other part of the game. Much to my own disgust, I believed the "have to be this high to ride" fallacies, and didn't step foot out of Highsec until I had a fat enough wallet to fit out a half dozen battlecruisers, 15 million sp (so those BC's were all T2 fit), and a couple of months "training" time in RvB. And once I got out there, I realised exactly how much time I had wasted. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
451
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 14:47:00 -
[286] - Quote
Rhes wrote: Why do you think vote tally has anything to do with subscription numbers?
Usually has a number of votes cast and what percentage that was of those eligible to vote. Since only subs can vote, the sub numbers and the eligible votes are at least close to the same. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2248
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 14:52:00 -
[287] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:And on another note, another day goes by, no CSM breakdown on the vote. I thought last year it was a couple days after the results were released, but then I checked the 2013 dev blogs. It was actually almost right after.
Let's see what happens on Wednesday, and if we get a vote breakdown. At least one of the bloggers has already implied that the delay means bad news on the subscription size.
And of course, if the subs are down, clearly the best way to regain them is to hammer high sec even more.
Waiting for the leaked directive by the cartels ordering all their serfs to subscribe another alt.
The vote totals are probably not out yet because CCP Dolan is letting his liver recover after fanfest. If I remember right the CSM minutes took an unusually long time to come out this year as well.
You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2932
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 14:55:00 -
[288] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:And on another note, another day goes by, no CSM breakdown on the vote. I thought last year it was a couple days after the results were released, but then I checked the 2013 dev blogs. It was actually almost right after.
Let's see what happens on Wednesday, and if we get a vote breakdown. At least one of the bloggers has already implied that the delay means bad news on the subscription size.
And of course, if the subs are down, clearly the best way to regain them is to hammer high sec even more.
Waiting for the leaked directive by the cartels ordering all their serfs to subscribe another alt. Why do you think vote tally has anything to do with subscription numbers?
Because of this thing called math. See, CCP gives total votes cast, and what that was a percentage of the sub base. With a little bit of algebra (yeah, I know, big word, look it up), one can figure out the size of the entire sub base, and compare year over year.
But clearly, you are not that obtuse, and simply trolling. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15320
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 14:56:00 -
[289] - Quote
La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5397
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 14:58:00 -
[290] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I must admit, I am starting to wonder if the transparent elections that have always been a there are a thing of the past.
Given the STV voting system they really need to remain transparent.
But then we have not actually even gotten confirmation as to the successful candidates on these forums by CCP. Nobody actually voted. CCP just picked the 14 people they wanted.
IMHO that's actually what they should be doing. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5825
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 15:05:00 -
[291] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets.
While true, the tongue in cheek point is about those folk who believe that anything not overtly benefiting highsec amounts to nerfing it. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Dave Stark
5329
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 15:17:00 -
[292] - Quote
as it stands, high sec doesn't really need many changes at all. it's a pretty good baseline to use as the measuring stick to ensuring that other areas of space are working correctly in terms of getting out what you put in. |

Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1055
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 15:17:00 -
[293] - Quote
Why am I not surprised this thread ended up in poo slingning and various agenda, good or not, being pushed.
Oh yeah, it's GD... |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2933
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 15:18:00 -
[294] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets. While true, the tongue in cheek point is about those folk who believe that anything not overtly benefiting highsec amounts to nerfing it.
I would love to see CCP do a data dump of total industrial activity from 3rd quarter 2013 and 1st quarter 2014, for all areas. Then do the data dump for total industrial activity from the same period for 2014 / 2015.
Then if they had the guts, they would also release size of the sub base for the same timeframe.
Because this immense buff to null sec industry is coming at the expense of high sec, and likely low sec. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Dave Stark
5329
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 15:19:00 -
[295] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Because this immense buff to null sec industry is coming at the expense of high sec, and likely low sec.
quote the sections of the devblog that demonstrates high sec industry receiving negative treatment. for the sake of completeness. |

Solecist Project's Alt
Wildly Inept Pacifists
57
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 15:30:00 -
[296] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets. While true, the tongue in cheek point is about those folk who believe that anything not overtly benefiting highsec amounts to nerfing it. I would love to see CCP do a data dump of total industrial activity from 3rd quarter 2013 and 1st quarter 2014, for all areas. Then do the data dump for total industrial activity from the same period for 2014 / 2015. Then if they had the guts, they would also release size of the sub base for the same timeframe. Because this immense buff to null sec industry is coming at the expense of high sec, and likely low sec. There was a thread not too long ago, with a similar pointless "conversation".
I even digged up an official graph by CCP.
Highsec produces most stuff, Null barely anything in comparsion.
Changing that is a necessity. |

Angeleh
Silverflames
28
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 15:31:00 -
[297] - Quote
CCP should start use the money the Eve players pay them for Devs that work on Eve instead of leaving it to a tiny minority of the playerbase to ruin the game for the majority of the players in order to enhance the minority's personal goals in the game.
I personally am very curious to see the voting numbers, and would like to know if they have managed to even get 10% of their players voting this year. But these numbers will probably be hidden like in the official announcement last year (and CCP has stopped informing the public about the amount of players they have, so we can't go find them elsewhere ourselves anymore).
Of course the more players that don't like having the game destroyed by CSM that quits, the higher the voting % gets. So would also be interesting to know how many people have voted that didn't vote last year.
CCP continues to not really do anything to inform people playing the game and not the forums about the CSM, however friends new to Eve got an ingame e-mail explaining how to vote from the old CSM, nice move from the CSM.
And don't say I should just go find my ideal representative to run for CSM and vote for them. My ideal representative is skilled enough that they are paid to make games, and would never care to have to sit and fight the rest of the CSM in order to keep a game they pay to play playable. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5825
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 15:33:00 -
[298] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Because this immense buff to null sec industry is coming at the expense of high sec, and likely low sec.
Good.
I mean it. Highsec has monopolized the industrial landscape for too long. Other parts of space should get to have a piece of the pie. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Angeleh
Silverflames
28
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 15:42:00 -
[299] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:I mean it. Highsec has monopolized the industrial landscape for too long. Other parts of space should get to have a piece of the pie.
The materials are hard to to impossible to get in hi sec, all other secs have a better opportunity to manufacture if they so desire.
But maybe there is a difference on mindset between the people that prefer hi sec and those that prefer null that is the cause of this and not the materials? Now if this is the case you will possible just make people quit the game and not increase the amount of people that manufacture in low / null by hurting hi sec. |

Frying Doom
3646
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 15:44:00 -
[300] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I must admit, I am starting to wonder if the transparent elections that have always been a there are a thing of the past.
Given the STV voting system they really need to remain transparent.
But then we have not actually even gotten confirmation as to the successful candidates on these forums by CCP. Nobody actually voted. CCP just picked the 14 people they wanted. Please go about your business in an orderly fashion. You are being watched at all times for your own safety. Subversive activity will not be tolerated. I will probably be agreeing with you if the voting statistics are not posted by Friday.
After all an election without transparency is not an election. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21560
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 16:00:00 -
[301] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Because this immense buff to null sec industry is coming at the expense of high sec, and likely low sec. You have fundamentally misunderstood the industry revamp.
Angeleh wrote:The materials are hard to to impossible to get in hi sec, all other secs have a better opportunity to manufacture if they so desire. No, they do not. That's the whole problem. Highsec has always offered the better opportunity to manufacture everything that doesn't require a seclevel-limited pipeline. The industry revamp doesn't actually change this GÇö it just makes it a slightly better deal for those that can make use of the opportunities outside of highsec. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Higgs Foton
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 16:08:00 -
[302] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Because this immense buff to null sec industry is coming at the expense of high sec, and likely low sec.
Don't know if that will be the case, but i always found it a bit odd industry was primarily done in high sec, and was not profitable enough in null sec. The fact that stuff needed for the null sec empires would have been manufactured in high sec is not how it should be. A null sec empire should be capable of mining and manufacturing all they need in their own space. One thing i find odd for instance is that i only can get the R.A.M. tech stuff needed for making T2 rigs in high sec for some odd reason. There is nothing of that stuff available in Deklein, which is a region which is on par with most of high sec because of the relatively dense population of the most holy Goonswarm Federation. VFK has a very good market on par with most high sec hubs.
Maybe i do not get how this works, but it would surely help if all industry stuff would be manufaturable or available in null sec. And my dear friend Dinsdale: If you complain so much about this, why don't you join a null sec corps and get your industry rolling there? Its not hard to get in such an alliance. The 3 days submerged in butter are a bit steep, i admit, but after that there is only PROFIT. :D
*Snip* Removed trolling part of the post. ISD Ezwal. *Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5826
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 16:09:00 -
[303] - Quote
Angeleh wrote: But maybe there is a difference on mindset between the people that prefer hi sec and those that prefer null that is the cause of this and not the materials? Now if this is the case you will possible just make people quit the game and not increase the amount of people that manufacture in low / null by hurting hi sec.
Game balance is not dictated by people who are stomping their feet and saying that if they don't get to keep the absurd, overwhelming advantage they've had for ten years then they'll quit.
Those people can go jump in a lake. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Pubbie Spy
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
48
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 16:16:00 -
[304] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets. While true, the tongue in cheek point is about those folk who believe that anything not overtly benefiting highsec amounts to nerfing it. I would love to see CCP do a data dump of total industrial activity from 3rd quarter 2013 and 1st quarter 2014, for all areas. Then do the data dump for total industrial activity from the same period for 2014 / 2015. Then if they had the guts, they would also release size of the sub base for the same timeframe. Because this immense buff to null sec industry is coming at the expense of high sec, and likely low sec.
Please explain why anything of what you said is a problem? |

knobber Jobbler
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
378
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 16:33:00 -
[305] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Andski wrote:
People want mission running to be about shooting triggers, ignoring everything else and collecting a reward as quickly as possible because isk/hr
Anything that requires them to be "engaged" and "playing the game" is antithetical to the goal of increasing their cashouts
Please don't confuse mission farmers who are a tiny minority with casual players, most of whom also like the idea of low & null but do not have the time to invest that most null corps & alliances demand of their player base, so play in high sec.
You can be a casual player and go to null sec. Many of us fit the description of a casual player.
|

Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1055
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 16:36:00 -
[306] - Quote
knobber Jobbler wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Andski wrote:
People want mission running to be about shooting triggers, ignoring everything else and collecting a reward as quickly as possible because isk/hr
Anything that requires them to be "engaged" and "playing the game" is antithetical to the goal of increasing their cashouts
Please don't confuse mission farmers who are a tiny minority with casual players, most of whom also like the idea of low & null but do not have the time to invest that most null corps & alliances demand of their player base, so play in high sec. You can be a casual player and go to null sec. Many of us fit the description of a casual player.
It works in low too. |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
1746
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 17:03:00 -
[307] - Quote
Nope, I live in lowsec and I am logged in 23.5/7 otherwise it wouldn't make any sense.
Oh how I miss my careless times in hisec. I could log in, update skill queue an log out. Now it is impossible, my casual gameplay died the moment I made that one jump... I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2250
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 17:43:00 -
[308] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets.
Yep all of that right next to nerfing highsec and you have an amazingly good way to combat falling subs. Also you forgot removing supercaps on that list. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2935
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 18:30:00 -
[309] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets.
Yeah, now that your stated goal (about 12 months ago) was to wreck high sec industry. Mission accomplished, on to the next task. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3072
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 18:53:00 -
[310] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets. Yeah, now that your stated goal (about 12 months ago) was to wreck high sec industry. Mission accomplished, on to the next task. You haven't adequately ever said why this is a bad thing, by the way. You try to convince people there's people making it happen, but other than your hand-wavey allusions to RMT there's literally no reason why this isn't positive.
But, you've realised you can't keep yelling "RMT!!!" with literally no evidence because you get banned when you do, so stick to this. Just as a word of advice to your one-man near full-time crusade over how people play a video game, you might want to include a reason as to why people should care. Or you're really just wasting your own time even more. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Dave Stark
5335
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 18:55:00 -
[311] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets. Yeah, now that your stated goal (about 12 months ago) was to wreck high sec industry. Mission accomplished, on to the next task.
i'm sorry, you've yet to link any evidence of high sec industry being wrecked.
evidence, it's required for you to be taken seriously. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
452
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 19:38:00 -
[312] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:
i'm sorry, you've yet to link any evidence of high sec industry being wrecked.
evidence, it's required for you to be taken seriously.
Unless you're a goon, then your word is gold.
That said, to get real data, it's probably gonna take six to eight months before any real effects on the market will be noticeable, unless you're CCP.
I miss the regular updates from CCPs in house economist. |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
881
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 19:38:00 -
[313] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets. Yeah, now that your stated goal (about 12 months ago) was to wreck high sec industry. Mission accomplished, on to the next task. I hope the next task is to end bad posting on eve-o.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
938
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 19:42:00 -
[314] - Quote
Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Bloc vote success. Yeah, color me disenfranchised, again. No Psychotic Monk, the road to nerfdom and stagnation of wardec mechanics in hisec will continue no doubt as a result....
Meh CSM.
Would you like to know more? |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2250
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 19:46:00 -
[315] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets. Yeah, now that your stated goal (about 12 months ago) was to wreck high sec industry. Mission accomplished, on to the next task. I hope the next task is to end bad posting on eve-o.
Unleash Kewpuh on eve-o he managed to get rid of two of the most horrible posters I've seen. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
1374
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 20:50:00 -
[316] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets. Yeah, now that your stated goal (about 12 months ago) was to wreck high sec industry. Mission accomplished, on to the next task. I hope the next task is to end bad posting on eve-o.
no offence but you'd be the first to go lol... Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3073
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 21:21:00 -
[317] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Rhes wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets. Yeah, now that your stated goal (about 12 months ago) was to wreck high sec industry. Mission accomplished, on to the next task. I hope the next task is to end bad posting on eve-o. Unleash Kewpuh on eve-o he managed to get rid of two of the most horrible posters I've seen.
What will he do after he's hit delete all? "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
884
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 21:22:00 -
[318] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:Rhes wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets. Yeah, now that your stated goal (about 12 months ago) was to wreck high sec industry. Mission accomplished, on to the next task. I hope the next task is to end bad posting on eve-o. no offence but you'd be the first to go lol... That wouldn't make WiS happen any faster.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Shadow' Broker
Negative-Impact The East India Co.
5
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 23:22:00 -
[319] - Quote
Very nice lineup,
Congrats to all of them.
Almost looks like a copy of my voting ballot(s) ;-) |

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
1376
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 23:25:00 -
[320] - Quote
Rhes wrote: That wouldn't make WiS happen any faster.
Did anyone mention wis? Your off topic post proved my point. Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |

Anna Shepart
Shepert Industries
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 01:03:00 -
[321] - Quote
Congrats to the CSM Members ! Who knows maybe in ~ 10years I'll win a trip to Iceland...
|

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2250
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 02:32:00 -
[322] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:La Nariz wrote:
Unleash Kewpuh on eve-o he managed to get rid of two of the most horrible posters I've seen.
What will he do after he's hit delete all?
Probably collapse from exhaustion because I bet the eve-o forums don't support that option. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Enaris Kerle
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
98
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 10:23:00 -
[323] - Quote
Angeleh wrote:I personally am very curious to see the voting numbers, and would like to know if they have managed to even get 10% of their players voting this year.
Angeleh wrote:Of course the more players that don't like having the game destroyed by CSM that quits, the higher the voting % gets. right, so a lower percentage of people voting means that people are indifferent to the CSM and a higher percentage of people voting means that the CSM was successful in driving people out of the game sounds reasonable Gallente born and raised, and tutored as a pleasure slave and courtesan to the exotic tastes of the Amarri court. Jade's career veered violently off course when a diplomatic envoy's transport was blown to pieces in mysterious circumstances and she was rescued from the escape pods by the enigmatic genetic mastermind Athule Snanm. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15333
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 13:11:00 -
[324] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Malcanis wrote:La Nariz wrote: You are right though nerfing highsec is the best way to combat falling subs.
I'm pretty confident that fixing POS, reworking sovereignty and making corp & alliance features work properly, along with giving power projection a savage kick in the balls, would all be more effective development targets. Yeah, now that your stated goal (about 12 months ago) was to wreck high sec industry. Mission accomplished, on to the next task.
My stated goal was to make 0.0 (and W-space and lo-sec) industry viable.
If you think that having less than 99% of non-supercap production is "wrecking" hi-sec industry then yeah that was my goal. I'd like to see people who want to live in 0.0 doing industry in 0.0 rather than being FORCED!!!!!!! to operate in hi-sec as at present "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
6363
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 13:17:00 -
[325] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
If you think that having less than 99% of non-supercap production is "wrecking" hi-sec industry then yeah that was my goal.
And you know exactly what he thinks. He is the poster boy for high sec greed, partisanship and privilege.
Quote: I'd like to see people who want to live in 0.0 doing industry in 0.0 rather than being FORCED!!!!!!! to operate in hi-sec as at present
That's the part that sticks in my craw (whatever a craw is lol). It is (according to their type) the most horrible thing in the world for ccp or anyone to 'force' them out of high sec because of, you know, playstyles or whatever. But it's totally ok for the situation in which others are CHAINED to high sec to continue.
He asks why CCP is trying to destroy high sec. I'm asking why they haven't done it yet.......
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18233
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 13:21:00 -
[326] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:My stated goal was to make 0.0 (and W-space and lo-sec) industry viable.
If you think that having less than 99% of non-supercap production is "wrecking" hi-sec industry then yeah that was my goal. I'd like to see people who want to live in 0.0 doing industry in 0.0 rather than being FORCED!!!!!!! to operate in hi-sec as at present Come now Malcanis, if it doesn't directly benefit one party it's a conspiracy by the other 
This is GD, common sense has no place here, the tinfoil is too stronk!! 
Never go full Ripard |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15335
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 14:46:00 -
[327] - Quote
Angeleh wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:I mean it. Highsec has monopolized the industrial landscape for too long. Other parts of space should get to have a piece of the pie. The materials are hard to to impossible to get in hi sec, all other secs have a better opportunity to manufacture if they so desire. But maybe there is a difference on mindset between the people that prefer hi sec and those that prefer null that is the cause of this and not the materials? Now if this is the case you will possible just make people quit the game and not increase the amount of people that manufacture in low / null by hurting hi sec.
Yeah, man, those poor hi-seccers who have to go to 0.0 to get skillbooks, datacores, access to the big market hubs where the regionally produced moon minerals are traded and of course local access to the high bulk minerals.
You know, you're right. I squeezed one last trip out of my CSM Time Machine and went back and had CCP add all those things to hi-sec and take them away from 0.0.
We good now? "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3992
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 14:27:00 -
[328] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: There is nothing, NOTHING, that null sec cannot now produce more efficiently than high sec. The cartels are already planning on controlling the most lucrative products (one of the goonswarm guys posted that fact, day 2, citing jump freighters as an example), and there is absolutely nothing high sec can do about it, except watch the vast majority of its industrial profits be diverted to the cartels.
And this is bad because.... why? "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2957
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 14:28:00 -
[329] - Quote
Oh, and on a separate note, yet another day passes, no dev blog on the breakdown of the CSM vote.
Like I said before:
2012: blog released same day as CSM results 2013: blog released hours after CSM results 2014: blog released......
Welcome to transparency. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15380
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 14:29:00 -
[330] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Malcanis wrote:Angeleh wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:I mean it. Highsec has monopolized the industrial landscape for too long. Other parts of space should get to have a piece of the pie. The materials are hard to to impossible to get in hi sec, all other secs have a better opportunity to manufacture if they so desire. But maybe there is a difference on mindset between the people that prefer hi sec and those that prefer null that is the cause of this and not the materials? Now if this is the case you will possible just make people quit the game and not increase the amount of people that manufacture in low / null by hurting hi sec. Yeah, man, those poor hi-seccers who have to go to 0.0 to get skillbooks, datacores, access to the big market hubs where the regionally produced moon minerals are traded and of course local access to the high bulk minerals. You know, you're right. I squeezed one last trip out of my CSM Time Machine and went back and had CCP add all those things to hi-sec and take them away from 0.0. We good now? Yeah, you are good. Are you seriously suggesting that all these changes are fair because null sec players have to come to high sec for skillbooks? (BTW, biggest supply of datacores is not high sec) One of the dev's can't remember which one, promised months ago that no one zone would ever be able to be independent of the rest, economically and resource wise. The architects of this mess turned that into a complete lie. There is nothing, NOTHING, that null sec cannot now produce more efficiently than high sec. The cartels are already planning on controlling the most lucrative products (one of the goonswarm guys posted that fact, day 2, citing jump freighters as an example), and there is absolutely nothing high sec can do about it, except watch the vast majority of its industrial profits be diverted to the cartels.
Sorry I missed the devblog where datacore production is being moved out of hi-sec, Could you point me to it?
Also when did CCP redistribute all the moons evenly across 0.0 to make sure that T2 producers don't have to import any of it? "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2957
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 14:29:00 -
[331] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: There is nothing, NOTHING, that null sec cannot now produce more efficiently than high sec. The cartels are already planning on controlling the most lucrative products (one of the goonswarm guys posted that fact, day 2, citing jump freighters as an example), and there is absolutely nothing high sec can do about it, except watch the vast majority of its industrial profits be diverted to the cartels.
And this is bad because.... why?
Nice troll. And if you are serious, please step away from the keyboard now, before you hurt yourself. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Aelisha
Achura-Waschi Exchange Monyusaiya Industry Trade Group
393
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 14:30:00 -
[332] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: There is nothing, NOTHING, that null sec cannot now produce more efficiently than high sec. The cartels are already planning on controlling the most lucrative products (one of the goonswarm guys posted that fact, day 2, citing jump freighters as an example), and there is absolutely nothing high sec can do about it, except watch the vast majority of its industrial profits be diverted to the cartels.
And this is bad because.... why?
Because apparently he'd like to blame 'THE MAN' rather than find those areas where focus, specialisation and small scale operation trump those bulk manufacturing arenas where cartel formation would be a logical step in profit generation.
Thinking is hard, I guess. CEO of the Achura-Waschi Exchange: Adaptable Industry for an Unpredictable Cluster
Intaki Reborn. Independent Capsuleer. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15380
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 14:30:00 -
[333] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Oh, and on a separate note, yet another day passes, no dev blog on the breakdown of the CSM vote.
Like I said before:
2012: blog released same day as CSM results 2013: blog released hours after CSM results 2014: blog released......
Welcome to transparency.
Let me tell you about Dolan Standard Time
(next week) "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21588
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 14:31:00 -
[334] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:One of the dev's can't remember which one, promised months ago that no one zone would ever be able to be independent of the rest, economically and resource wise. GǪand that remains as true as ever due to how resources are distributed.
Quote:There is nothing, NOTHING, that null sec cannot now produce more efficiently than high sec. Yes there is. Almost everything, in fact, due to the logistics and (yes, still) costs involved in doing so. The gap is just much more narrow now so null actually has the ability to be competitive with the right kind of setup. That's all.
Quote:Like I said before: GǪand what did it look like in 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011?
In other words, you can't answer the question. Why is that? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Dave Stark
5373
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 14:32:00 -
[335] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: There is nothing, NOTHING, that null sec cannot now produce more efficiently than high sec. The cartels are already planning on controlling the most lucrative products (one of the goonswarm guys posted that fact, day 2, citing jump freighters as an example), and there is absolutely nothing high sec can do about it, except watch the vast majority of its industrial profits be diverted to the cartels.
And this is bad because.... why? Nice troll. And if you are serious, please step away from the keyboard now, before you hurt yourself.
to be fair, i'm surprised you haven't hurt yourself yet.
must be difficult not tripping over all that tin foil that you've stockpiled. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2957
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 14:32:00 -
[336] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Malcanis wrote:Angeleh wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:I mean it. Highsec has monopolized the industrial landscape for too long. Other parts of space should get to have a piece of the pie. The materials are hard to to impossible to get in hi sec, all other secs have a better opportunity to manufacture if they so desire. But maybe there is a difference on mindset between the people that prefer hi sec and those that prefer null that is the cause of this and not the materials? Now if this is the case you will possible just make people quit the game and not increase the amount of people that manufacture in low / null by hurting hi sec. Yeah, man, those poor hi-seccers who have to go to 0.0 to get skillbooks, datacores, access to the big market hubs where the regionally produced moon minerals are traded and of course local access to the high bulk minerals. You know, you're right. I squeezed one last trip out of my CSM Time Machine and went back and had CCP add all those things to hi-sec and take them away from 0.0. We good now? Yeah, you are good. Are you seriously suggesting that all these changes are fair because null sec players have to come to high sec for skillbooks? (BTW, biggest supply of datacores is not high sec) One of the dev's can't remember which one, promised months ago that no one zone would ever be able to be independent of the rest, economically and resource wise. The architects of this mess turned that into a complete lie. There is nothing, NOTHING, that null sec cannot now produce more efficiently than high sec. The cartels are already planning on controlling the most lucrative products (one of the goonswarm guys posted that fact, day 2, citing jump freighters as an example), and there is absolutely nothing high sec can do about it, except watch the vast majority of its industrial profits be diverted to the cartels. Sorry I missed the devblog where datacore production is being moved out of hi-sec, Could you point me to it? Also when did CCP redistribute all the moons evenly across 0.0 to make sure that T2 producers don't have to import any of it?
You are really that clueless about datacores? And uh, yeah, show me the high sec moon goo producers that allows them to trade with other high sec moon goo producers?
Your comments are getting more ridiculous by the moment. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21588
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 14:35:00 -
[337] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:You are really that clueless about datacores? Are you? Are you also that clueless about moon goo and about ore and about production facilities and about logistics?
Quote:Your comments are getting more ridiculous by the moment. Just because you have to struggle harder and harder to evade them without exposing your own ignorance does not make his comments ridiculous.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3335
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 15:48:00 -
[338] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Oh, and on a separate note, yet another day passes, no dev blog on the breakdown of the CSM vote.
Like I said before:
2012: blog released same day as CSM results 2013: blog released hours after CSM results 2014: blog released......
Welcome to transparency. there are no results Dinsdale. we asked for our group to be CSM, and CCP just made it happen. The votes just went in a bin. Now we can get on with destroying the whole of highsec, so be quiet and let us get on with it, thanks. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3336
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 16:01:00 -
[339] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I would love to see CCP do a data dump of total industrial activity from 3rd quarter 2013 and 1st quarter 2014, for all areas. Then do the data dump for total industrial activity from the same period for 2014 / 2015.
Then if they had the guts, they would also release size of the sub base for the same timeframe.
Because this immense buff to null sec industry is coming at the expense of high sec, and likely low sec. If they released this, you simply wouldn't believe it. You would just scream that it's made up to make it look like high sec had too much industry and becomes more balanced when in truth it was balanced and they broke it. No matter what they provide you with, you will continue to claim what you always do.
The truth is, high sec has way too much of the industry sector. For the majority of items it's simply not feasible to build them in null, it's cheaper and quicker to simply ship items from high sec. These changes will bring industry in line to a point where all sections of space, even wormholes where refining as been far from viable, will be able to run industry competitively. Will that mean that high sec industry is going to shrink? Of course it will, because all of us doing industry in high sec while living in null will consolidate our operations.
From my point of view, the margins on highsec industry should be smaller than anywhere else, since that's the price you pay for living in safety. Low sec should have larger margins, null slightly larger than that and wormholes should have the best margins. But the way they are running it, most areas of space will be about on par when you factor in logistics. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Marsha Mallow
513
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 16:05:00 -
[340] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:There is nothing, NOTHING, that null sec cannot now produce more efficiently than high sec. The cartels are already planning on controlling the most lucrative products (one of the goonswarm guys posted that fact, day 2, citing jump freighters as an example), and there is absolutely nothing high sec can do about it, except watch the vast majority of its industrial profits be diverted to the cartels. Hold it. You're making several flawed assumptions but the most glaring is the fate of current large scale industrialists after the industry changes. I suspect this is a result of holding onto this 'casual independent' playstyle leading you to be completely ignorant about the real response of industrialists to the proposed changes.
Other than you, I've not seen a single person complain they are about to be turned into null-sec serfs, forced to labour for nothing for the cartels etc. They're busy formulating plans to adjust their operations to profit from these changes, not sobbing all over the forums. If anything the 'cartels' might consider a degree of caution given how much ISK and effort can be shifted into their sphere and their relatively flimsy tools to monitor or extract any profit from those operations. As well as how destructive that type of player can be if they see potential profit to be made.
There are solo players with trillions of ISK who can out-research, invent, manufacture and trade some existing nullsec alliances. Most importantly, they can out-think the vast majority of players engaged in any sort of economic activity. If nullsec alliances are about to leap into these arenas, they might be slightly unprepared for just how vicious and competitive it actually is. Granted GSF has a cabal with some of the smartest economic thinkers, but the wider CFC doesn't and neither does the rest of nullsec.
Remember, heavy indy types typically have experience, capital, they are nowhere near as risk averse as you assume and they are driven by acquiring personal profit without any loyalty or shame. Most importantly they have none of the duties or obligations alliances do. Their costs are running, capex, subs etc not SRP, JB fuel, infrastructure, investment in Supers. Adding, say rent fees onto their costs is negligible. Solo or small groups have less of the risk and none of the communication problems larger groups do trying to run massive industrialist schemes.
If you think industrialists are so thick they'll hand over their money and effort to their alliances (even as active PVP members) I'd remind you of the Supercap sellers who have historically sold to their enemies - and even rented from their 'enemies' in order to do so incognito - because they separate their obligations to their combat mains from their ISK making activities. TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Jaun Pacht-Feng
FOX News 24
83
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 16:16:00 -
[341] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
i'm sorry, you've yet to link any evidence of high sec industry being wrecked.
evidence, it's required for you to be taken seriously.
Unless you're a goon, then your word is gold. That said, to get real data, it's probably gonna take six to eight months before any real effects on the market will be noticeable, unless you're CCP. I miss the regular updates from CCPs in house economist. We all missed that!
But, Mynnna didn't like Goonswarms competitors having a sliver of the economical info that he gets his hands on.
So it was done away with.
"Go Goon or Go Home"
Perfect description of the biggest problem with Eve.-á |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21594
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 16:19:00 -
[342] - Quote
Jaun Pacht-Feng wrote:We all missed that!
But, Mynnna didn't like Goonswarms competitors having a sliver of the economical info that he gets his hands on.
So it was done away with. And Mynnna had what position in 2010, again? Or are you suggesting that he somehow managed to get Diagoras fired? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
461
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 16:49:00 -
[343] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote: And this is bad because.... why?
The fundamental design for the game originally required a balance between null, low, and high secs. The idea was that null provided the high end mins, which flowed as trade to high sec, and from high sec finished goods flowed into null. That's why there were only a handful of conquerable stations in null sec. Low sec was where 'piracy' was to take place, with players wanting to do that sort of thing hitting the trade between null sec and high sec.
This is one of the basic underpinnings of EvE economy, just as much as the price of trit and PvP providing a 'ship sink' to create demand. Surprisingly, it's been kept intact for a long time now, but this new industry buff to null risks seriously undermining it. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3341
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 16:56:00 -
[344] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote: And this is bad because.... why?
The fundamental design for the game originally required a balance between null, low, and high secs. The idea was that null provided the high end mins, which flowed as trade to high sec, and from high sec finished goods flowed into null. That's why there were only a handful of conquerable stations in null sec. Low sec was where 'piracy' was to take place, with players wanting to do that sort of thing hitting the trade between null sec and high sec. This is one of the basic underpinnings of EvE economy, just as much as the price of trit and PvP providing a 'ship sink' to create demand. Surprisingly, it's been kept intact for a long time now, but this new industry buff to null risks seriously undermining it. So in your mind, null sec is for mining, low sec is for PVP and high sec is for profit?
That's just... just no.
All sectors of space are supposed to have their own flavour but viably give a choice for a variety of playstyles. As it currently works, pretty much every playstyle works in high sec, in safety, with very little need for direct interaction, while other sectors of space can do at best a subset of highsec activities with additional risk and a necessity to work with others.
High sec should be less profitable in most situations as it's easier in most situations. That said, when logistics are factored in, these changes break about even. The only real difference is you can;t all pile in and around Jita anymore and have to spread out, having to move things a few jumps through safe space to and from hubs. Oh no, the horror. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21595
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:00:00 -
[345] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:The fundamental design for the game originally required a balance between null, low, and high secs. The idea was that null provided the high end mins, which flowed as trade to high sec, and from high sec finished goods flowed into null. That's why there were only a handful of conquerable stations in null sec. Low sec was where 'piracy' was to take place, with players wanting to do that sort of thing hitting the trade between null sec and high sec. GǪand that design went out the window many many years ago since it proved not to create much in the way of interesting gameplay, and was replaced by a vision where player-controll spaced wouldGǪ you knowGǪ offer more control to players. It's same kind of erroneous idea as the whole Gǣhighsec is for newbiesGǥ nonsense that hasn't been relevant for a decade.
Quote:Surprisingly, it's been kept intact for a long time now, but this new industry buff to null risks seriously undermining it. No, the surprise is that so many still believe it is how the game should work, when the devs have long since abandoned that kind of artificial separation of gameplay.
This industry revamp is just starting to correct a number of mistakes that were done when that switch happened, mainly ones that made some pretty flawed assumptions about how large a population the game would hold and should be able to support. It doesn't undermine anything that has any relevance to the current game design and instead does the one thing the game is supposed to do: provide players with the tools to create their own environment. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1296

|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:03:00 -
[346] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them.
The Rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
4001
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:03:00 -
[347] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote: And this is bad because.... why?
The fundamental design for the game originally required a balance between null, low, and high secs. The idea was that null provided the high end mins, which flowed as trade to high sec, and from high sec finished goods flowed into null. That's why there were only a handful of conquerable stations in null sec. Low sec was where 'piracy' was to take place, with players wanting to do that sort of thing hitting the trade between null sec and high sec. This is one of the basic underpinnings of EvE economy, just as much as the price of trit and PvP providing a 'ship sink' to create demand. Surprisingly, it's been kept intact for a long time now, but this new industry buff to null risks seriously undermining it.
The fundemental design of the game was an experiment in how an mmo community would change and develop if given virtually free reign to decide their own fate.
Your artificial constraints on what people should be doing because of a number in the top left of the screen has no bearing on that concept.
Its a Nietzschian universe, and I hope it always remains so.
If blue doughnut and hail gewns is the result, then so be it. "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21597
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:19:00 -
[348] - Quote
GǪoh, and note how the same tools that offer more freedom for nullsec industry also offer more freedom for highsec industry. Everyone is getting a boost by this because more is given over to player control. All kinds of silly artificial NPC-regulated restrictions are being replaced by mechanics that respond to player dynamics and which let you play how you want, where you want, without being shackled to any particular area or structure or grind.
The only potential GÇ£downsideGÇ¥ (and I'm being very generous with the use of that word here) is that some content may be less universally valuable since its use is no longer a mandatory for the industrial game play. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10722
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:43:00 -
[349] - Quote
The industry changes will also be a boost to regional market hubs and create opportunities for arbitrage. God forbid you might move industrial alts away from Jita and towards Amarr, Rens or Dodixie. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Dramaticus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
542
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:52:00 -
[350] - Quote
We will drag you kicking and screaming into this Golden Age of EVE The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal
The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1535
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:55:00 -
[351] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote: There are solo players with trillions of ISK who can out-research, invent, manufacture and trade some existing nullsec alliances. Most importantly, they can out-think the vast majority of players engaged in any sort of economic activity. If nullsec alliances are about to leap into these arenas, they might be slightly unprepared for just how vicious and competitive it actually is. Granted GSF has a cabal with some of the smartest economic thinkers, but the wider CFC doesn't and neither does the rest of nullsec.
The Cabal, or mostly myself and Mynnna, function as the rudders for all CFC finance actually. One of our functions is to disseminate information, tips, advice, manipulations, and meta gaming to the greater CFC. This extends all the way down to the member level where I have spent 4 years now teaching and guiding the average goon to big profit. We ourselves do industry on a scale equal to anyone in the game except maybe a handful. The rabbit hole goes a whole lot deeper than anyone realizes I think. Even CCP.
Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
464
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:57:00 -
[352] - Quote
Dramaticus wrote:We will drag you kicking and screaming into this Golden Age of EVE
No, you'll drag people kicking and screaming to the 'Cancel Subscription' button. |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
381
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:59:00 -
[353] - Quote
it breaks down a little at the member level though because you can lead a goon to isk but you can't make him drink |

Dramaticus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
545
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:00:00 -
[354] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dramaticus wrote:We will drag you kicking and screaming into this Golden Age of EVE No, you'll drag people kicking and screaming to the 'Cancel Subscription' button.
[citation needed] The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal
The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them |

Solecist Project's Alt
Wildly Inept Pacifists
126
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:05:00 -
[355] - Quote
Goons ftw!
Without you, the hating masses would have taken over long ago, killing EVE like they did with Ultima! |

Dave Stark
5385
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:07:00 -
[356] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dramaticus wrote:We will drag you kicking and screaming into this Golden Age of EVE No, you'll drag people kicking and screaming to the 'Cancel Subscription' button.
10 years of growth contradicts every one that has ever said that. |

Marsha Mallow
516
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:09:00 -
[357] - Quote
Aryth wrote:The Cabal, or mostly myself and Mynnna, function as the rudders for all CFC finance actually. One of our functions is to disseminate information, tips, advice, manipulations, and meta gaming to the greater CFC. This extends all the way down to the member level where I have spent 4 years now teaching and guiding the average goon to big profit. We ourselves do industry on a scale equal to anyone in the game except maybe a handful. The rabbit hole goes a whole lot deeper than anyone realizes I think. Even CCP. I know. Mynna (on a different alt ) used to sit in a channel I was in (on a different alt) and regularly chatted about ISK making. We bagged our first corp tech and funded a titan due to early intel which (I always found hilarious) came from people who were supposedly hostiles in null. One thing I've always liked is that in MD there are various big money players who are quite generous advising newer players on how to scale up - particularly those they can see have a knack for it - regardless of their affiliations.
Re the rest of the CFC, I'm sure you do advise and there are widescale manips, but natural talent counts for a lot. And I think those types are actually rare based on previous interractions, and quite careful to separate their alliance loyalties from their large scale ISK generation.
That's not even counting those who are pure industrialists to the exclusion of everything else. I still talk to a guy I met early on ingame who has never shot another player or left empire, but who sits on (last time I spoke to him) 1t ISK worth of each mineral purely for long term speculation. As a hobby, he told me, although his main activities were PVE and T2 production :) I'm quite intrigued as to how that type of person - who answers to no one, and has no loyalties - will respond if a new frontier opens up with massive potential profits. TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Serene Repose
1342
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:17:00 -
[358] - Quote
I just wanted to post in a jy-normously stupid thread. I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility toward every form of tyranny over the mind of man.-á |

Solecist Project's Alt
Wildly Inept Pacifists
127
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:24:00 -
[359] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote:I just wanted to post in a jy-normously stupid thread. And now it's complete. |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1538
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:35:00 -
[360] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote: I know. Mynna (on a different alt ) used to sit in a channel I was in (on a different alt) and regularly chatted about ISK making. We bagged our first corp tech and funded a titan due to early intel which (I always found hilarious) came from people who were supposedly hostiles in null. One thing I've always liked is that in MD there are various big money players who are quite generous advising newer players on how to scale up - particularly those they can see have a knack for it - regardless of their affiliations.
Re the rest of the CFC, I'm sure you do advise and there are widescale manips, but natural talent counts for a lot. And I think those types are actually rare based on previous interractions, and quite careful to separate their alliance loyalties from their large scale ISK generation.
Finding a new crop of Cabal members is exactly why I do it. However, based on the insane amount of mechanics and market knowledge it requires they are special unicorns rarer than FCs. At scale you tend to only manipulate the largest markets in EVE because nothing else holds your own wealth much less the other hundreds of people following you in the market.
It isn't so much individuals who have wealth that matter as they don't impact the galaxy. Its the guys steering hundreds of producers, marketeers, investors at a time that do. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18254
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:50:00 -
[361] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dramaticus wrote:We will drag you kicking and screaming into this Golden Age of EVE No, you'll drag people kicking and screaming to the 'Cancel Subscription' button. You should lead by example, I'm sure some will follow you, and the game will be better for it.
Disregard Monarchy, Acquire Chickens Never go full Ripard |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
382
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:12:00 -
[362] - Quote
we also like highsec because it's full of people who have no concept of their time having value, so they farm up all the PI and trit we need to fuel our engines of war despite it being hilariously awful isk per hour
thanks, highsec
thighsec |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1538
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:15:00 -
[363] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dramaticus wrote:We will drag you kicking and screaming into this Golden Age of EVE No, you'll drag people kicking and screaming to the 'Cancel Subscription' button. You should lead by example, I'm sure some will follow you, and the game will be better for it. Also Goons (GrrGäó) and the nulluminati aren't really interested in destroying highsec, although it's probably a huge source of entertainment to them that certain highsec groups believe otherwise. Why would they want to destroy an area of the game that provides them with a target, and tear, rich environment, to entertain their line members with in times of "peace"?
We spend lots of time laughing in our jabber about some of the tinfoil and grrgoons and linking each other the choice posts when we are not otherwise engaged. The fact we are some of the largest producers in high-sec adds to the irony. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2958
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:18:00 -
[364] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dramaticus wrote:We will drag you kicking and screaming into this Golden Age of EVE No, you'll drag people kicking and screaming to the 'Cancel Subscription' button. You should lead by example, I'm sure some will follow you, and the game will be better for it. Also Goons (GrrGäó) and the nulluminati aren't really interested in destroying highsec, although it's probably a huge source of entertainment to them that certain highsec groups believe otherwise. Why would they want to destroy an area of the game that provides them with a target, and tear, rich environment, to entertain their line members with in times of "peace"? We spend lots of time laughing in our jabber about some of the tinfoil and grrgoons and linking each other the choice posts when we are not otherwise engaged. The fact we are some of the largest producers in high-sec adds to the irony.
Not for much longer are you going to be producing in high sec. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18255
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:20:00 -
[365] - Quote
Aryth wrote:The fact we are some of the largest producers in high-sec adds to the irony. I wasn't aware of this part, I knew that you produced stuff in highsec, just not the scale of your operations.
Disregard Monarchy, Acquire Chickens Never go full Ripard |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2348
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:39:00 -
[366] - Quote
Have CCP released the actual voting totals yet?
This is not a signature. |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1538
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:48:00 -
[367] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Aryth wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dramaticus wrote:We will drag you kicking and screaming into this Golden Age of EVE No, you'll drag people kicking and screaming to the 'Cancel Subscription' button. You should lead by example, I'm sure some will follow you, and the game will be better for it. Also Goons (GrrGäó) and the nulluminati aren't really interested in destroying highsec, although it's probably a huge source of entertainment to them that certain highsec groups believe otherwise. Why would they want to destroy an area of the game that provides them with a target, and tear, rich environment, to entertain their line members with in times of "peace"? We spend lots of time laughing in our jabber about some of the tinfoil and grrgoons and linking each other the choice posts when we are not otherwise engaged. The fact we are some of the largest producers in high-sec adds to the irony. Not for much longer are you going to be producing in high sec.
Yep. Already ran the #'s and the primary market we have been playing in (for personal ISK income) lately will continue to be highsec. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
21602
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:49:00 -
[368] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Not for much longer are you going to be producing in high sec. Why not?
I mean, really, where does this cognitive dissonance come from? On the one hand, they're evil and clever enough to subvert an entire game company with the intention of running it into the ground, and on the other hand, they apparently can't do simple maths.  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
4012
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:52:00 -
[369] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Not for much longer are you going to be producing in high sec.
I assume given your calculations neither are you then, Dino?
Y'know, cos all the changes are aimed specifically at you, like everything else "bad" that happens in this game that you hate but still pay the Goons for the privilege of playing?
I mean, if CCP do what the cartels tell them, and the gewns are the biggest cartel, that means that you pay them to play in their game, right?
So you are actually feeding the problem yourself, right? "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
382
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:53:00 -
[370] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Aryth wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dramaticus wrote:We will drag you kicking and screaming into this Golden Age of EVE No, you'll drag people kicking and screaming to the 'Cancel Subscription' button. You should lead by example, I'm sure some will follow you, and the game will be better for it. Also Goons (GrrGäó) and the nulluminati aren't really interested in destroying highsec, although it's probably a huge source of entertainment to them that certain highsec groups believe otherwise. Why would they want to destroy an area of the game that provides them with a target, and tear, rich environment, to entertain their line members with in times of "peace"? We spend lots of time laughing in our jabber about some of the tinfoil and grrgoons and linking each other the choice posts when we are not otherwise engaged. The fact we are some of the largest producers in high-sec adds to the irony. Not for much longer are you going to be producing in high sec. did you forget that jump freighters take fuel or something |

Batelle
Tymast Industries 150th
2592
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:58:00 -
[371] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Someone posted that TQ lost 4000 subs over last year. I have found no citation for that, but it feels right.
hush now, chicken little. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2256
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 20:03:00 -
[372] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dramaticus wrote:We will drag you kicking and screaming into this Golden Age of EVE No, you'll drag people kicking and screaming to the 'Cancel Subscription' button.
The myth of the highsec pubbie rapture is just that, a myth, it will never happen. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Marsha Mallow
519
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 21:18:00 -
[373] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Finding a new crop of Cabal members is exactly why I do it. However, based on the insane amount of mechanics and market knowledge it requires they are special unicorns rarer than FCs. At scale you tend to only manipulate the largest markets in EVE because nothing else holds your own wealth much less the other hundreds of people following you in the market.
It isn't so much individuals who have wealth that matter as they don't impact the galaxy. Its the guys steering hundreds of producers, marketeers, investors at a time that do. Fair play, but despite enjoying a degree of collaboration some of us do genuinely treat this side of the game as one of wits, luck and strategy and prefer to do so without interference. It's one of the few areas you can carve a niche in solo. There are always upsides to collaboration, but the point for some of us is to win or lose based upon our own choices, and being spoonfed can dilute that experience. Galaxy wide manips and control are fine and I've no doubt awesome, but it's a second job involving a lot of people. In some ways it's less rewarding than discovering things for yourself and nipping in to harvest quietly. Niche markets are still out there with only a handful of players you can either collaborate with or terrorise.
In a hyper-capitalist universe I'd be wary of assuming major nullsec blocs can completely dominate individuals with equal wealth/expertise across the entire market. Just because individual players don't deliberately act as a unit doesn't mean they can't be a problem in various spheres (particularly if they spot certain trends).
Nobody look at his eyes, he's trying to recruit you into the cartel to be a slave. But in all seriousness, some of Dinsdale's concerns re the subordination of individual playstyles to large group mechanics I agree with in spirit. We can be wage slaves IRL, ingame we can be independent if we want, and that choice should be preserved to a degree.
The point he misses is that if we choose to play as independents we have to accept the risk resides exclusively with us and be prepared to take it, otherwise our activities are less profitable/effiicient. As an enterprise solo ISK making is one of the purest forms of PVP ingame imo and should not be confused with mindless zombie farming. We're often fighting/competing with blocs or individuals with vast reserves we can't see or predict. Which is fine by me v0v
Tippia wrote:On the one hand, they're evil and clever enough to subvert an entire game company with the intention of running it into the ground, and on the other hand, they apparently can't do simple maths.  This argument also assumes the rest of us are gormless morons, the battle is already lost, so the only counter is to whine to CCP about how unfair it is. That we are collectively stupid, lazy, disorganised and cowardly. And we're doomed. *Snore* Funny how the rest of us who are prepared to fight - have always been fighting at various levels - are unconcerned. TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9631
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 21:19:00 -
[374] - Quote
You're not the problem, then. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1539
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 22:51:00 -
[375] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote:Aryth wrote:Finding a new crop of Cabal members is exactly why I do it. However, based on the insane amount of mechanics and market knowledge it requires they are special unicorns rarer than FCs. At scale you tend to only manipulate the largest markets in EVE because nothing else holds your own wealth much less the other hundreds of people following you in the market.
It isn't so much individuals who have wealth that matter as they don't impact the galaxy. Its the guys steering hundreds of producers, marketeers, investors at a time that do. Fair play, but despite enjoying a degree of collaboration some of us do genuinely treat this side of the game as one of wits, luck and strategy and prefer to do so without interference. It's one of the few areas you can carve a niche in solo. There are always upsides to collaboration, but the point for some of us is to win or lose based upon our own choices, and being spoonfed can dilute that experience. Galaxy wide manips and control are fine and I've no doubt awesome, but it's a second job involving a lot of people. In some ways it's less rewarding than discovering things for yourself and nipping in to harvest quietly. Niche markets are still out there with only a handful of players you can either collaborate with or terrorise. In a hyper-capitalist universe I'd be wary of assuming major nullsec blocs can completely dominate individuals with equal wealth/expertise across the entire market. Just because individual players don't deliberately act as a unit doesn't mean they can't be a problem in various spheres (particularly if they spot certain trends). Nobody look at his eyes, he's trying to recruit you into the cartel to be a slave. But in all seriousness, some of Dinsdale's concerns re the subordination of individual playstyles to large group mechanics I agree with in spirit. We can be wage slaves IRL, ingame we can be independent if we want, and that choice should be preserved to a degree. The point he misses is that if we choose to play as independents we have to accept the risk resides exclusively with us and be prepared to take it, otherwise our activities are less profitable/effiicient. As an enterprise solo ISK making is one of the purest forms of PVP ingame imo and should not be confused with mindless zombie farming. We're often fighting/competing with blocs or individuals with vast reserves we can't see or predict. Which is fine by me v0v Tippia wrote:On the one hand, they're evil and clever enough to subvert an entire game company with the intention of running it into the ground, and on the other hand, they apparently can't do simple maths.  This argument also assumes the rest of us are gormless morons, the battle is already lost, so the only counter is to whine to CCP about how unfair it is. That we are collectively stupid, lazy, disorganised and cowardly. And we're doomed. *Snore* Funny how the rest of us who are prepared to fight - have always been fighting at various levels - are unconcerned.
I am not suggesting there aren't niches at all. However, any market we go into we are going in with some advantage the "little guy" isn't going to have. Niche gameplay is how I got my start so I remember quite well how much fun it was for me at that time. Unfortunately those things don't scale. The things that do scale? There Be Dragons Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7323
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 22:56:00 -
[376] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Aryth wrote:The fact we are some of the largest producers in high-sec adds to the irony. I wasn't aware of this part, I knew that you produced stuff in highsec, just not the scale of your operations. one build system was an anomolously huge dot on one "where things are built" map Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division. |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1539
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 22:59:00 -
[377] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Aryth wrote:The fact we are some of the largest producers in high-sec adds to the irony. I wasn't aware of this part, I knew that you produced stuff in highsec, just not the scale of your operations. one build system was an anomolously huge dot on one "where things are built" map
Now just that. But based on the # we knew we were a non-trivial part of that dot. Trillions churned in that system. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
280
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 23:15:00 -
[378] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Weaselior wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Aryth wrote:The fact we are some of the largest producers in high-sec adds to the irony. I wasn't aware of this part, I knew that you produced stuff in highsec, just not the scale of your operations. one build system was an anomolously huge dot on one "where things are built" map Now just that. But based on the # we knew we were a non-trivial part of that dot. Trillions churned in that system.
Are we secretly neighbors? |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
387
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 23:39:00 -
[379] - Quote
Loraine Gess wrote:Aryth wrote:Weaselior wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Aryth wrote:The fact we are some of the largest producers in high-sec adds to the irony. I wasn't aware of this part, I knew that you produced stuff in highsec, just not the scale of your operations. one build system was an anomolously huge dot on one "where things are built" map Now just that. But based on the # we knew we were a non-trivial part of that dot. Trillions churned in that system. Are we secretly neighbors? probably |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
466
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 23:43:00 -
[380] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote: 10 years of growth contradicts every one that has ever said that.
Concurrency numbers dispute that 'ten years of growth'. Unless there are an ever increasing number of paying subs that never log in. |

Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
281
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 23:44:00 -
[381] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:Loraine Gess wrote:[
Are we secretly neighbors? probably
Does the system start with a M, and is it 1 jump from jita |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1539
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 00:06:00 -
[382] - Quote
Loraine Gess wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:Loraine Gess wrote:[
Are we secretly neighbors? probably Does the system start with a M, and is it 1 jump from jita
It does indeed. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2645
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 04:11:00 -
[383] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote: 10 years of growth contradicts every one that has ever said that.
Concurrency numbers dispute that 'ten years of growth'. Unless there are an ever increasing number of paying subs that never log in.
Supercap/cap alt numbers tend to grow and not log in unless there is a thing to do. So yeah actually this is happening. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2963
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 05:10:00 -
[384] - Quote
So, now that Dolan is history, what is the over / under on the CSM results? Saturday, Sunday, June, October?
I can see now why they have not been released. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10730
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 09:08:00 -
[385] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:So, now that Dolan is history, what is the over / under on the CSM results? Saturday, Sunday, June, October?
I can see now why they have not been released.
holy **** you said something reasonable Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Dave Stark
5407
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 11:03:00 -
[386] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote: 10 years of growth contradicts every one that has ever said that.
Concurrency numbers dispute that 'ten years of growth'. Unless there are an ever increasing number of paying subs that never log in.
of course there is; look at dr E's presentation at fanfest. you can quite clearly see that more supercaps are being produced than destroyed. as far as i'm aware, people don't log in and ship spin with those. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 13:39:00 -
[387] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote: of course there is; look at dr E's presentation at fanfest. you can quite clearly see that more supercaps are being produced than destroyed. as far as i'm aware, people don't log in and ship spin with those.
That's based on the assumption that every supercap produced is using either a cap alt or a cyno alt instead of being stored as a war reserve at POS. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2261
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 13:44:00 -
[388] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote: of course there is; look at dr E's presentation at fanfest. you can quite clearly see that more supercaps are being produced than destroyed. as far as i'm aware, people don't log in and ship spin with those.
That's based on the assumption that every supercap produced is using either a cap alt or a cyno alt instead of being stored as a war reserve at POS.
A clear demonstration of how little you know about how the game works. I don't think I could have done a better job showing it than you just did yourself. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Nam Dnilb
Universal Frog
184
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 14:10:00 -
[389] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:So, now that Dolan is history, what is the over / under on the CSM results? Saturday, Sunday, June, October?
My money is on never.
|

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
1806
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 15:31:00 -
[390] - Quote
I know something you don't know, I know something you don't know...
:) I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
4033
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 15:37:00 -
[391] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:So, now that Dolan is history, what is the over / under on the CSM results? Saturday, Sunday, June, October?.
Does it matter? You will only spin them to fit whatever ridiculous troll-theory you are pedaling
The worst thing is, responding to you makes me worse than you. "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 15:40:00 -
[392] - Quote
Ok, surprisingly the numbers are out.
http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/csm9-presenting-the-new-council-members-election-data-and-officer-changes/
Interestingly, the second largest block of voters was 30 day old accounts. CCP states that voting was down this time, significantly. |

Dave Stark
5427
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 15:41:00 -
[393] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Dave Stark wrote: of course there is; look at dr E's presentation at fanfest. you can quite clearly see that more supercaps are being produced than destroyed. as far as i'm aware, people don't log in and ship spin with those.
That's based on the assumption that every supercap produced is using either a cap alt or a cyno alt instead of being stored as a war reserve at POS. did you just suggest that people leave ships worth billions of isk just sat, unpiloted, in poses?
please tell me you didn't just suggest that. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 15:42:00 -
[394] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:[ A clear demonstration of how little you know about how the game works. I don't think I could have done a better job showing it than you just did yourself.
If that's 'how the game works' how does that make Eve different from 'Pay To Win'?
Though personally I doubt that' 'how the game works' but rather 'how Goonswarm does things'.
Dave Stark wrote: did you just suggest that people leave ships worth billions of isk just sat, unpiloted, in poses?
please tell me you didn't just suggest that.
Considering how often losing them that way is whined about, yes. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
4033
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 15:44:00 -
[395] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:CCP states that voting was down this time, dignificantly.
At least thats good news "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 15:55:00 -
[396] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:CCP states that voting was down this time, significantly. At least thats good news
Not really, the numbers show the average age of the voter increased from last time, meaning there were fewer noobs/alts voting. Combined with lower concurrency numbers, this suggests that there were simply fewer new accounts.
CCP did not release, this time, the number of votes placed compared to the number of eligible voters, suggesting that subs are, as Dinsdale suggests, down. |

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
235
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 15:56:00 -
[397] - Quote
There's still a CSM?
Pity. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
4033
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 15:59:00 -
[398] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote: Not really, the numbers show the average age of the voter increased from last time, meaning there were fewer noobs/alts voting. Combined with lower concurrency numbers, this suggests that there were simply fewer new accounts.
CCP did not release, this time, the number of votes placed compared to the number of eligible voters, suggesting that subs are, as Dinsdale suggests, down.
Suggests does not mean that this means anything
And using something Dinsdale suggests to support that point of view, well, I just wont go there lol
Suffice to say, Im just happy that voter turnout is down.
Long may interest wane. "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:00:00 -
[399] - Quote
I'm curious to see what June 30ths Financial report brings. Last year CCP only made 300k in profit as of their June 30 report, and Concurrency was much higher then. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15402
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:02:00 -
[400] - Quote
Nam Dnilb wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:So, now that Dolan is history, what is the over / under on the CSM results? Saturday, Sunday, June, October? My money is on never.
I hope you weren't too attached to your money.
https://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/csm9-presenting-the-new-council-members-election-data-and-officer-changes/ "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:07:00 -
[401] - Quote
Sorry, Malcanis, you were Ninja'd previous page.
Ramona McCandless wrote: Suggests does not mean that this means anything
And using something Dinsdale suggests to support that point of view, well, I just wont go there lol
Suffice to say, Im just happy that voter turnout is down.
Long may interest wane.
Actually your putting the cart before the horse. I'm not using Dinsdale's suggestion to imply the numbers are right, I'm stating the numbers imply Dinsdale's suggestion might have some basis in reality.
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5537
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:11:00 -
[402] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote: Interestingly, the second largest block of voters was 30 day old accounts. CCP states that voting was down this time, significantly.
This is my surprised face.
And CCP really believes the bad voter turnout was simply due to a lack of player awareness about the CSM. This is an interesting position to put forward when all those new eggs seemed to be aware enough to vote.
I would expect most official communication from CCP for the rest of the next year to be sprinkled with praise about how good a job the CSM is doing "representing" players. I would not be surprised if we see a blog or even a video dedicated to that purpose to reinforce the propaganda.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Aralyn Cormallen
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
400
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:12:00 -
[403] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:[quote=Cygnet Lythanea] And using something Dinsdale suggests to support that point of view, well, I just wont go there lol
Since she was suggesting last page we leave POS towers full of unpiloted Supercaps lying around, its not surprising Dinsdale has a listener here.
NOTE: I am a fair man, I am more that willing to be proven wrong on this subject. By all means, please direct me to a Goonswarm Federation POS with an unpiloted Supercapital (Aeon preferred) sitting in it. If you do so, I will openly apologise for mocking your opinion, and will be forever chastised 
|

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15402
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:15:00 -
[404] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote: Interestingly, the second largest block of voters was 30 day old accounts. CCP states that voting was down this time, significantly.
This is my surprised face. And CCP really believes the bad voter turnout was simply due to a lack of player awareness about the CSM. This is an interesting position to put forward when all those new eggs seemed to be aware enough to vote. I would expect most official communication from CCP for the rest of the next year to be sprinkled with praise about how good a job the CSM is doing "representing" players. I would not be surprised if we see a blog or even a video dedicated to that purpose to reinforce the propaganda.
Is it so hard to believe that 14 EVE players might want EVE to be a better game, and go to some effort to try and help this happen?
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
4033
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:16:00 -
[405] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Sorry, Malcanis, you were Ninja'd previous page. Ramona McCandless wrote: Suggests does not mean that this means anything
And using something Dinsdale suggests to support that point of view, well, I just wont go there lol
Suffice to say, Im just happy that voter turnout is down.
Long may interest wane.
Actually your putting the cart before the horse. I'm not using Dinsdale's suggestion to imply the numbers are right, I'm stating the numbers imply Dinsdale's suggestion might have some basis in reality. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
Fair enough, I accept your position
However, I and those who felt similar didnt bother voting this year at all but we have no intetion of unsubbing, so its cool, I know I may not be representitive of the majority
"They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Dave Stark
5431
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:17:00 -
[406] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Is it so hard to believe that 14 EVE players might want EVE to be a better game, and go to some effort to try and help this happen?
yes. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
4033
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:19:00 -
[407] - Quote
Malcanis wrote: Is it so hard to believe that 14 EVE players might want EVE to be a better game, and go to some effort to try and help this happen?
I think whats really being said by some of us (I may be reading Doc wrong) is that a democratic process is not necessarily the best way to select those who want to make the game better.
That said, those (inc yourself) that Ive heard speak on various subjects seem to have it close to your hearts, so something is working. "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5916
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:19:00 -
[408] - Quote
Just so I'm getting the tinfoil straight here, the point is that it's *not* possible that they've simply done a good job getting the message out to new players, and that most of the abstains are just people embittered that they can't auto win by being highsec? "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Marsha Mallow
522
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:20:00 -
[409] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Considering how often losing them that way is whined about, yes. en24 reader detected.
Regarding the voting stats that is a real shame it's so low. Voter apathy is pretty common in my age group and generation, but these decreases are a concern. Having said that I don't think CCP promoted the elections all that well this year, and reading the candidate agendas was a bit of a marathon. Perhaps some streamlining needs to take place. I was thinking something like the corp finder ingame where you can filter to specifics (areas of expertise etc).
Speaking of which, would the ability to vote ingame help? It's not as though the forums are accessed by the majority. I'm starting to lean towards single person votes as well rather than account based. With numbers so low it's giving multiple account holders way too much power. I don't really see why players under 6 months old should be allowed to vote either, perhaps an unfair sentiment but v0v most electoral systems have age limits. Using a voting system based on players rather than accounts might reflect poorly from a PR point of view in subsequent years if it shows a huge drop, but we don't actually need to see raw numbers. Percentages would work.
I wonder how those nationality of voters stats tally with nationality of registered account holders, just out of curiosity.
Oh and before you start screeching 'the end is nigh, I was right all along' Dinsdale, be careful to note a lot of nullsec players remarked there were hardly any bloc candidates this year, and a lot of people with relatively low profiles.
TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15402
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:25:00 -
[410] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Malcanis wrote:Is it so hard to believe that 14 EVE players might want EVE to be a better game, and go to some effort to try and help this happen?
yes.
What an unhappy world you live in.
Let me be your little ray of sunshine by assuring that we do and we did (well, 13 of us anyway)
I hope that has brightened your bleak, hopeless existence just a little, even if the sheer evanesence of the experience only served to deepen your gloom by contrasting it. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15402
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:26:00 -
[411] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Malcanis wrote: Is it so hard to believe that 14 EVE players might want EVE to be a better game, and go to some effort to try and help this happen?
I think whats really being said by some of us (I may be reading Doc wrong) is that a democratic process is not necessarily the best way to select those who want to make the game better. That said, those (inc yourself) that Ive heard speak on various subjects seem to have it close to your hearts, so something is working.
Perhaps I'm biased, but democracy produced a pretty good team last year.
It's a truism that every nation gets the government it deserves. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:26:00 -
[412] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Just so I'm getting the tinfoil straight here, the point is that it's *not* possible that they've simply done a good job getting the message out to new players, and that most of the abstains are just people embittered that they can't auto win by being highsec?
The major complaint that CCP has admitted was an issue was that people didn't know it was going on, due to the announcements being buried rather frequently. That 'new' players might magically have known more than anyone else seems a bit odd and suggests that a lot of alt voting went on, which is in line with what goons were claiming earlier.
We don't have the needed demographics to be certain, but it's a fair bet that you'd see that 30 and 120 day accounts are wildly disproportionate to other account ages, if we did. |

Dave Stark
5433
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:26:00 -
[413] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Malcanis wrote:Is it so hard to believe that 14 EVE players might want EVE to be a better game, and go to some effort to try and help this happen?
yes. What an unhappy world you live in. Let me be your little ray of sunshine by assuring that we do and we did (well, 13 of us anyway) I hope that has brightened your bleak, hopeless existence just a little, even if the sheer evanesence of the experience only served to deepen your gloom by contrasting it. you're in an npc corp and this is the eve-o forums. i love you malc, but as you can see... i can't take your posts seriously. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15404
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:28:00 -
[414] - Quote
I'm on holiday and slumming it with the dirty skanks of the Deep Core red light district. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5916
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:33:00 -
[415] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Just so I'm getting the tinfoil straight here, the point is that it's *not* possible that they've simply done a good job getting the message out to new players, and that most of the abstains are just people embittered that they can't auto win by being highsec? The major complaint that CCP has admitted was an issue was that people didn't know it was going on, due to the announcements being buried rather frequently. That 'new' players might magically have known more than anyone else seems a bit odd and suggests that a lot of alt voting went on, which is in line with what goons were claiming earlier. We don't have the needed demographics to be certain, but it's a fair bet that you'd see that 30 and 120 day accounts are wildly disproportionate to other account ages, if we did.
I would point out that BR-5 introduced a lot of newbies to the game.
It's well within reason that they are voting, this year the CSM campaigns were pushed pretty heavily. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
4033
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:34:00 -
[416] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
Perhaps I'm biased, but democracy produced a pretty good team last year.
It's a truism that every nation gets the government it deserves.
I cant and wont argue with empirical evidence, that would be silly lol
But I do feel that roles should be offered to those best at the job, rather than on the whim of the masses.
Thats just my two cents. Coming from where I do, democracy is nothing but trouble lol. "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5539
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:34:00 -
[417] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote: Interestingly, the second largest block of voters was 30 day old accounts. CCP states that voting was down this time, significantly.
This is my surprised face. And CCP really believes the bad voter turnout was simply due to a lack of player awareness about the CSM. This is an interesting position to put forward when all those new eggs seemed to be aware enough to vote. I would expect most official communication from CCP for the rest of the next year to be sprinkled with praise about how good a job the CSM is doing "representing" players. I would not be surprised if we see a blog or even a video dedicated to that purpose to reinforce the propaganda. Is it so hard to believe that 14 EVE players might want EVE to be a better game, and go to some effort to try and help this happen?
Caring does not make this whole thing any better than player "representation" theater.
You can claim to care all you want but you have no actual authority to do anything, and CCP has no obligation to do anything the CSM unanimously agree upon. As such, the CSM players club are irrelevant and ineffectual "representation", and as more players come to realize this, it is no great surprise that voter participation is falling off. CCP can't even be bothered to release the CSM minutes in a timely fashion or bother to consult with the CSM prior to doing really dumb stuff, which just reinforces how important they really view the CSM to be to them.
Please do explain to us in detail the CSM's specific role in regard to oversight of CCP and what exactly they have done (and are doing) to prevent another T20 incident or Dev/CCP employee misconduct. Flying you guys to Iceland or rallying you guys to do damage control when CCP does something stupid is not oversight.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Marsha Mallow
523
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:38:00 -
[418] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Coming from where I do, democracy is nothing but trouble lol. That's what riots are for :P  TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5539
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:41:00 -
[419] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Malcanis wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Malcanis wrote:Is it so hard to believe that 14 EVE players might want EVE to be a better game, and go to some effort to try and help this happen?
yes. What an unhappy world you live in. Let me be your little ray of sunshine by assuring that we do and we did (well, 13 of us anyway) I hope that has brightened your bleak, hopeless existence just a little, even if the sheer evanesence of the experience only served to deepen your gloom by contrasting it. you're in an npc corp and this is the eve-o forums. i love you malc, but as you can see... i can't take your posts seriously.
He had a big plan to do a trolling stunt by joining goons but failed to commit, and has canceled his sub instead.
One last act of gleeful spite
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
4033
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:42:00 -
[420] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Coming from where I do, democracy is nothing but trouble lol. That's what riots are for :P 
Oh dont even lol
Also
fleg "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:46:00 -
[421] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: It's well within reason that they are voting, this year the CSM campaigns were pushed pretty heavily.
CCP is saying that low voter turn out was caused by lack of CSM vote visibility.
If people were campaigning as hard as you claim, then people would have known the vote was going on. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15406
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 17:21:00 -
[422] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Malcanis wrote:
Perhaps I'm biased, but democracy produced a pretty good team last year.
It's a truism that every nation gets the government it deserves.
I cant and wont argue with empirical evidence, that would be silly lol But I do feel that roles should be offered to those best at the job, rather than on the whim of the masses. Thats just my two cents. Coming from where I do, democracy is nothing but trouble lol.
It should be recalled that the CSM's original role was to keep CCP honest. Luckily, that's not really an issue these days, but arguably that's at least partly because the CSM has helped to keep CCP honest.
That's not a responsibility that's compatible with CCP directly choosing the CSM.
I know what the voter figures are this year, and it's a large enough number to make meaningful choices between a decent sized candidate pool. If only a fraction of EVE players want to make the effort and take responsibility for informing themselves sufficiently to make a meaningful vote, then tbh, I'm kind of OK with that as long as the voter pool is big enough. And I think that it is.
But let's be honest with ourselves here: most people don't vote because they simply don't care enough and so can't be bothered. Most of the shallow cynicism and hostility towards the CSM is basically a tissue-thin wrapper around this obvious turd.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15406
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 17:23:00 -
[423] - Quote
When CCP were talking with CSm8 about what they could do to get voter numbers up, we told them, sure, more publicity, maybe an evemail to new players explaining the process with links to relevent pages, yadda yadda, but the only real way to get a bunch of people voting was for CCP to propose doing something incredibly awful.
EG: let's say that CCP proposed to remove CONCORD (or introduce CONCORD to lo-sec) 6 weeks before the election and threw open a "comments" thread. I would bet money that this would see an extra 10k voters. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
4034
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 17:26:00 -
[424] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
But let's be honest with ourselves here: most people don't vote because they simply don't care enough and so can't be bothered. Most of the shallow cynicism and hostility towards the CSM is basically a tissue-thin wrapper around this obvious turd.
Accepted.
Just to make it clear: Its the voting for things in general I dislike, not the CSM itself :) "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "I can't honestly believe that Peace and Prosperity has a face like a naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares -á-á ***FREE THE JITA 1*** |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5547
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 18:15:00 -
[425] - Quote
Malcanis wrote: But let's be honest with ourselves here: most people don't vote because they simply don't care enough and so can't be bothered. Most of the shallow cynicism and hostility towards the CSM is basically a tissue-thin wrapper around this obvious turd.
I'm sure that's what you want people to believe or maybe you truly believe it yourself, but it does not make the CSM any more relevant or effectual as player "representation" when a so-called representative body does not have any power or authority whatsoever. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Prince Kobol
1700
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 19:01:00 -
[426] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
I know what the voter figures are this year, and it's a large enough number to make meaningful choices between a decent sized candidate pool. If only a fraction of EVE players want to make the effort and take responsibility for informing themselves sufficiently to make a meaningful vote, then tbh, I'm kind of OK with that as long as the voter pool is big enough. And I think that it is.
But let's be honest with ourselves here: most people don't vote because they simply don't care enough and so can't be bothered. Most of the shallow cynicism and hostility towards the CSM is basically a tissue-thin wrapper around this obvious turd.
I have voted each year expect this year because from what I saw the pool to choose from was well.. awful.
I believed that it did not matter who was voted in as they are all cut from teh same cloth and none of them particularly did a good job of selling themselves. .
That is not CCP fault and it is not the concept of the CSM at fault.
If not enough worth while candidates are running for CSM then you have to ask the question why?
Is it because they do not believe they would ever be able to over come the block votes?
Is it because they do not believe that the CSM have any real power to guide CCP and if so why do they believe that?
As for not caring, why do players not care? What is it that makes the majority of players not give a rats ass about the CSM.
I have never seen anybody from CCP really try and get a handle on this.
Why have CCP never sent out a questionnaire to all subscribers asking them their thoughts on the CSM. There things CCP could do to try and find out why the players are not interested if they really do care about the credibility of the CSM and being months late with the meeting minutes does not help.
I actually believe that CSM8 was the best CSM we have ever had and had the best chance ever to really show the player base how effective a CSM can be, however CCP once again let them down and that appears to be a recurring theme with the entire CSM concept.
|

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2263
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 19:31:00 -
[427] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:La Nariz wrote:[ A clear demonstration of how little you know about how the game works. I don't think I could have done a better job showing it than you just did yourself. If that's 'how the game works' how does that make Eve different from 'Pay To Win'? Though personally I doubt that' 'how the game works' but rather 'how Goonswarm does things'. Dave Stark wrote: did you just suggest that people leave ships worth billions of isk just sat, unpiloted, in poses?
please tell me you didn't just suggest that.
Considering how often losing them that way is whined about, yes.
Apparently reading is tough for you too so I'll be blunt. You have no idea how the game works and you should be ignored until you learn how it works. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5927
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 19:37:00 -
[428] - Quote
La Nariz wrote: Apparently reading is tough for you too so I'll be blunt. You have no idea how the game works and you should be ignored until you learn how it works.
And even afterward, for having the temerity to post to such an extent with any knowledge of the subject. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 19:47:00 -
[429] - Quote
La Nariz wrote: Apparently reading is tough for you too so I'll be blunt. You have no idea how the game works and you should be ignored until you learn how it works.
Allow me to equally be blunt in return. Go read your own killboards, then come back and tell me people do not leave super caps in POS.
LaNarnz, assuming that is your main, I've been playing eve a hell of lot longer than you, As I said, that may be how things are done in Goonswarm, but if you think that every supercap in game has it's own alt account set up just for it, please go get your head examined. Most people just buy an older toon and put it on their main account. There used to be a fairly brisk trade in people living in high sec training up toons for cap ship pilots and selling them.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10733
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 19:52:00 -
[430] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Allow me to equally be blunt in return. Go read your own killboards, then come back and tell me people do not leave super caps in POS.
LaNarnz, assuming that is your main, I've been playing eve a hell of lot longer than you, As I said, that may be how things are done in Goonswarm, but if you think that every supercap in game has it's own alt account set up just for it, please go get your head examined. Most people just buy an older toon and put it on their main account. There used to be a fairly brisk trade in people living in high sec training up toons for cap ship pilots and selling them.
yeah, you're wrong
maybe not every supercap in the game has its own alt account set up for it, but the vast majority do Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2264
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 19:52:00 -
[431] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:La Nariz wrote: Apparently reading is tough for you too so I'll be blunt. You have no idea how the game works and you should be ignored until you learn how it works.
Allow me to equally be blunt in return. Go read your own killboards, then come back and tell me people do not leave super caps in POS. LaNarnz, assuming that is your main, I've been playing eve a hell of lot longer than you, As I said, that may be how things are done in Goonswarm, but if you think that every supercap in game has it's own alt account set up just for it, please go get your head examined. Most people just buy an older toon and put it on their main account. There used to be a fairly brisk trade in people living in high sec training up toons for cap ship pilots and selling them.
Yet another example of you demonstrating how little you know of the game. You should be a shamed of yourself for being in the game longer than me yet knowing less of it than me; you can't even spell my simple name right. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 20:02:00 -
[432] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:[ Yet another example of you demonstrating how little you know of the game. You should be a shamed of yourself for being in the game longer than me yet knowing less of it than me; you can't even spell my simple name right.
Ok, La Bar mitsvah, let me ask you a question, which is more economically sensible, to buy two highly trained toons and put them on your main account as alts, or set up two alt accounts to keep your super caps on? Because if you're tooling around in a supercap you're probably not swinging solo. I know there are guys that do, but most are in alliances.
Or are you actually suggesting that goonswarm really is just five guys multiboxing?
You're also implying that your killmails about bagging super caps when blowing up POS are a lie, btw. |

Higgs Foton
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 20:06:00 -
[433] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:[quote=La Nariz][
Or are you actually suggesting that goonswarm really is just five guys multiboxing?
Not five but twenty.
*Snip* Removed trolling part of the post. ISD Ezwal. *Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2265
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 20:11:00 -
[434] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:La Nariz wrote:[ Yet another example of you demonstrating how little you know of the game. You should be a shamed of yourself for being in the game longer than me yet knowing less of it than me; you can't even spell my simple name right. Ok, La Bar mitsvah, let me ask you a question, which is more economically sensible, to buy two highly trained toons and put them on your main account as alts, or set up two alt accounts to keep your super caps on? Because if you're tooling around in a supercap you're probably not swinging solo. I know there are guys that do, but most are in alliances. Or are you actually suggesting that goonswarm really is just five guys multiboxing? You're also implying that your killmails about bagging super caps when blowing up POS are a lie, btw.
I don't understand how you can be this much of a failure at comprehension and manage to post. I literally said killboards are worthless, there is nothing implied and only an explicit statement regarding them. Is it such a hard to thing to understand that an unsubscribed holding account would be in possession of a supercap? You've been in this game how much longer than me and you can't fathom that? This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 20:25:00 -
[435] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:
Is it such a hard to thing to understand that an unsubscribed holding account would be in possession of a supercap? You've been in this game how much longer than me and you can't fathom that?
E: Forget it I drank to much today, you're being willfully obtuse and should be ignored.
Because non-subscribed accounts don't have anything to do with what we were talking about. Live subs do. The point was that he was claiming because the rate supercaps were being built exceeded that of them being destroyed, that live subscriptions were still increasing in number, because everyone was using alts that never log in for supercap storage.
If those accounts are not subscribed, his argument is invalid, as subscriptions would still be down. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15426
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 20:35:00 -
[436] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Malcanis wrote:
I know what the voter figures are this year, and it's a large enough number to make meaningful choices between a decent sized candidate pool. If only a fraction of EVE players want to make the effort and take responsibility for informing themselves sufficiently to make a meaningful vote, then tbh, I'm kind of OK with that as long as the voter pool is big enough. And I think that it is.
But let's be honest with ourselves here: most people don't vote because they simply don't care enough and so can't be bothered. Most of the shallow cynicism and hostility towards the CSM is basically a tissue-thin wrapper around this obvious turd.
I have voted each year expect this year because from what I saw the pool to choose from was well.. awful. I believed that it did not matter who was voted in as they are all cut from the same cloth and many of the candidates are people who failed to get into previous CSM's. On top of this none of them particularly did a good job of selling themselves. . That is not CCP fault and it is not the concept of the CSM at fault. If not enough worth while candidates are running for CSM then you have to ask the question why? Is it because they believe no matter how good their campaign might be, they would never be able to over come the block vote? Is it because they do not believe that the CSM have any real power to guide CCP and if so why do they believe that? As for not caring, why do players not care? What is it that makes the majority of players not give a rats ass about the CSM. I have never seen anybody from CCP really try and get a handle on this. Why have CCP never sent out a questionnaire to all subscribers asking them their thoughts on the CSM I do not know. There are things CCP could do to try and find out why the players are not interested if they really do care about the credibility of the CSM and being months late with the meeting minutes does not help. I actually believe that CSM8 was the best CSM we have ever had and had the best chance ever to really show the player base how effective a CSM can be, however CCP once again let them down and that appears to be a recurring theme with the entire CSM concept.
Well 5 of CSM8 have been re-elected; CSM9 can't be that bad. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 20:37:00 -
[437] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
Well 5 of CSM8 have been re-elected; CSM9 can't be that bad.
I'm waiting on results to determine if they're good or bad.
My main concern is hte increasing numbers of negative indicators of eve's health as an MMO though. It's not to 'Eve Is Dying' yet, but we're starting to see actual non-positive signs. |

Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
800
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 20:52:00 -
[438] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:I'm waiting on results to determine if they're good or bad.
My main concern is hte increasing numbers of negative indicators of eve's health as an MMO though. It's not to 'Eve Is Dying' yet, but we're starting to see actual non-positive signs. Were you checking the entrails of slaughtered chickens for signs of EVE dying, or did you have any actual data to share with us?
Note: the plural of "anecdote" is not "data". Take solace knowing that even after the sun sets, and your sky is filled with darkness, that the sun is still shining. -D. Entervention Psychotic Monk joins BNI |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15426
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 20:53:00 -
[439] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Malcanis wrote:
Well 5 of CSM8 have been re-elected; CSM9 can't be that bad.
I'm waiting on results to determine if they're good or bad. My main concern is hte increasing numbers of negative indicators of eve's health as an MMO though. It's not to 'Eve Is Dying' yet, but we're starting to see actual non-positive signs.
I have some thoughts on this but I'm not going to waste them on page 22 of a thread that's devolved into a **** measuring contest on supercap administration process. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1780
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 21:10:00 -
[440] - Quote
Want to improve player-csm involvement? Remove the voluntary DOX requirement and you'll instantly diversify the selection of candidates. More candidate diversity --> better chance of finding an acceptable non-bloc candidate to represent non-bloc players.
The bulk of Eve is involved in neither Sov nor WH. The bulk of the CSM are bloc candidates or WH candidates. Why the f*** would a hisec (or lowsec) guy vote for a bloc candidate or a wh dude?
Why don't more non-bloc people run? Because there are a few people in this community that take **** way too far.
|

Marsha Mallow
525
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 21:12:00 -
[441] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:I have some thoughts on this but I'm not going to waste them on page 22 of a thread that's devolved into a **** measuring contest on supercap administration process. *David Attenborough voice*
Failing to penetrate each other, the males resort to floucing, handwaving, buttockjiggling and outright bribery Only the mods are aroused by this display, but like true pros they resist Apparently, the males of this species have proved typically ineffectual in dealing with random slags whose opinon is irrelevant And have resorted to rubbing each other under tall trees, whilst gazing lustfully across the savanna At miners, and pitiful badpoasters
/wins TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18259
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 21:14:00 -
[442] - Quote
I regret ever starting this thread, it appears to have attracted every shitposter in 30LY.
Disregard Monarchy, Acquire Chickens Never go full Ripard |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 21:38:00 -
[443] - Quote
Sibyyl wrote: Were you checking the entrails of slaughtered chickens for signs of EVE dying, or did you have any actual data to share with us?
Note: the plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Who do you Voodoo ****?
Reduction in average concurrency plus an increase in the average 'age' of the voting accounts in the CSM plus fewer people voting at all.
Individually, other than concurrency, they're nothing to get excited about, but taken as a larger picture it's a bit more troubling. I'm gonna hold off until CCPs six month financials in June before I start selling 'Dinsdale Was Right' tshirts, but it does seem to be indicating that subs overall have decreased. |

Sephira Galamore
Inner Beard Society Affirmative.
334
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 21:45:00 -
[444] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:My main concern is hte increasing numbers of negative indicators of eve's health as an MMO though. It's not to 'Eve Is Dying' yet, but we're starting to see actual non-positive signs. I have some thoughts on this but I'm not going to waste them on page 22 of a thread that's devolved into a **** measuring contest on supercap administration process. Can you post them somewhere else then...? Kinda curious :) |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
471
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 21:47:00 -
[445] - Quote
Sephira Galamore wrote:Can you post them somewhere else then...? Kinda curious :)
I have to admit I am too. |

Kethry Avenger
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
122
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 22:56:00 -
[446] - Quote
So with the assumption that the same percentage of subscribed accounts voted as last year. Tranquility only has 257,997 subscribers vs 409,759 last year.
Though considering the abysmal promoting that happened for the election, and that no new means of voter education were promoted by CCP this year, that is probably a wrong assumption. But I'm sure subscriptions are down otherwise they would have given us the numbers to figure it out.
CCP could of course clear this up by telling us what percentage of the subscribers voted.
If the percentage is the same then EVE is dying but the same percentage is engaged with the CSM.
If the percentage is lower EVE is not growing but just people aren't bothering with the CSM.
If the percentage is higher, the server is being shut down the day Valkyrie goes live.
Congratulations to the winners.
If you didn't vote, feel free to say why you didn't so CCP can make changes, but don't bother bitchen to the CSM if they do stuff you don't like. I find it funny that people have time to post multiple times about why they didn't or won't vote but can't find time to find 1-14 candidates they want to vote for. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2266
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 23:34:00 -
[447] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Want to improve player-csm involvement? Remove the voluntary DOX requirement and you'll instantly diversify the selection of candidates. More candidate diversity --> better chance of finding an acceptable non-bloc candidate to represent non-bloc players.
The bulk of Eve is involved in neither Sov nor WH. The bulk of the CSM are bloc candidates or WH candidates. Why the f*** would a hisec (or lowsec) guy vote for a bloc candidate or a wh dude?
Why don't more non-bloc people run? Because there are a few people in this community that take **** way too far, carrying grudges over to RL.
Removing the voluntary DOX also increases safety for the CSM members too I know a certain chairman used to receive voluminous amounts of death threats from dumb pubbies during his CSM tenure. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2266
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 23:35:00 -
[448] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:La Nariz wrote:
Is it such a hard to thing to understand that an unsubscribed holding account would be in possession of a supercap? You've been in this game how much longer than me and you can't fathom that?
E: Forget it I drank to much today, you're being willfully obtuse and should be ignored.
Because non-subscribed accounts don't have anything to do with what we were talking about. Live subs do. The point was that he was claiming because the rate supercaps were being built exceeded that of them being destroyed, that live subscriptions were still increasing in number, because everyone was using alts that never log in for supercap storage. If those accounts are not subscribed, his argument is invalid, as subscriptions would still be down.
Yep please reiterate how you have no understanding of how the game works. We need a few more data points so we can show significance. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5935
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 23:44:00 -
[449] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I regret ever starting this thread, it appears to have attracted every shitposter within 30LY.
What's a light year?  "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18265
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 23:54:00 -
[450] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:What's a light year?  The opposite of a heavy one obviously.
Disregard Monarchy, Acquire Chickens Never go full Ripard |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
473
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 23:54:00 -
[451] - Quote
Ok, I put La Nertz on ignore. Let me know when he sobers up. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5937
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 23:56:00 -
[452] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:What's a light year?  The opposite of a heavy one obviously.
I choked. Well done old boy. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Marsha Mallow
526
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 00:07:00 -
[453] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Ok, I put La Nertz on ignore. Let me know when he sobers up. No TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
905
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 00:49:00 -
[454] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Ok, I put La Nertz on ignore. Let me know when he sobers up. So you admit he was right.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2266
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 01:56:00 -
[455] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Ok, I put La Nertz on ignore. Let me know when he sobers up.
I rest my case this highsec pubbie lost the argument, has no coping skills and no idea about anything related to the game. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
477
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 02:01:00 -
[456] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Ok, I put La Nertz on ignore. Let me know when he sobers up. So you admit he was right.
No, but I can see attempting to talk to him at the moment is pointless. No matter what I'd say, and even if I had Fozzie or another dev come in and point out that I was right and La Nanu was wrong, he'd sit there and try to argue that it really meant the opposite.
I have better things to do with my time than entertain drunks. |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3194
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 02:26:00 -
[457] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:No, but I can see attempting to talk to him at the moment is pointless. No matter what I'd say, and even if I had Fozzie or another dev come in and point out that I was right and La Nanu was wrong, he'd sit there and try to argue that it really meant the opposite. ah. like insisting that ccp ytterbium's confirmation that capitals won't enter highsec doesn't mean capitals won't be able to enter highsec.
oh. that was you. |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3194
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 02:29:00 -
[458] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Not really, the numbers show the average age of the voter increased from last time, meaning there were fewer noobs/alts voting. Combined with lower concurrency numbers, this suggests that there were simply fewer new accounts.
CCP did not release, this time, the number of votes placed compared to the number of eligible voters, suggesting that subs are, as Dinsdale suggests, down. no it doesn't. and no it doesn't. christ. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
477
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 03:02:00 -
[459] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote: oh. that was you.
So, you gonna stay in game long enough to dock at the 10 year vet station?
Oh, wait.
No, I don't take what CCP says as gospel truth until they at the very least provide some sort of detail. Preferably Patch Notes. So, yes, CCP ytterbiums 'No, because reasons' I did not accept, but CCP Fozzies 'No, and here's why and what steps we're taking' was acceptable. I'll believe it when I see it in patch notes, but I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt when they actually provide details beyond 'because reasons'. |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3196
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 03:11:00 -
[460] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:No, I don't take what CCP says as gospel truth until they at the very least provide some sort of detail. Preferably Patch Notes. so you wouldn't read 'we'll allow rigs on freighters' as 'CCP ARE ALLOWING CAPITALS IN HIGHSEC AND THEY'RE GOING TO BLOW UP ALL THE NPC STATIONS'?
hahaha no wait that did happen |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3196
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 03:17:00 -
[461] - Quote
my point is that you're drawing conclusions from nothing again and it needs to stop |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18265
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 03:30:00 -
[462] - Quote
I'd give up Benny, Cygnet Lythanea is unlikely to acknowledge that she may be wrong, she's also confident that her 10 years of playing Eve makes her the foremost authority on how things work, despite evidence to the contrary.
Judging by posts in another thread she also believes that 90% of Eve players are scum, because our ingame personas are a reflection of our true selves
Disregard Monarchy, Acquire Chickens Never go full Ripard |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
478
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 04:22:00 -
[463] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I'd give up Benny, Cygnet Lythanea is unlikely to acknowledge that she may be wrong, she's also confident that her 10 years of playing Eve makes her the foremost authority on how things work, despite evidence to the contrary.
I'd put more stock into what benny writes if he bothered to read entire my entire posts instead of filling in the parts he wants to hear.
Example:
'We're seeing general negative indicators that suggest subscriptions are down, but at this time have no conclusive proof.'
becomes
'ZOMG EVE IS DYING!!!!1111oneone'
As I said before, I'll wait till the June Financial releases before I say that Eve is actually suffering from subscription loss, though I expect that we'll see that it has.
Benny seemed deeply offended when I implied that CCP might deny changes that people would find objectionable until the release, thus avoiding a negative impact on it's half year earning statement.
|

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15431
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 05:12:00 -
[464] - Quote
Ace? Is that you? "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18265
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 05:32:00 -
[465] - Quote
^^ Nah, the lack of mentions of elephants in the room and WoW make it unlikely. 
Disregard Monarchy, Acquire Chickens Never go full Ripard |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3201
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 06:32:00 -
[466] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:I'd put more stock into what benny writes if he bothered to read entire my entire posts instead of filling in the parts he wants to hear.
Example:
'We're seeing general negative indicators that suggest subscriptions are down, but at this time have no conclusive proof.'
becomes
'ZOMG EVE IS DYING!!!!1111oneone'
Benny Ohu wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Not really, the numbers show the average age of the voter increased from last time, meaning there were fewer noobs/alts voting. Combined with lower concurrency numbers, this suggests that there were simply fewer new accounts.
CCP did not release, this time, the number of votes placed compared to the number of eligible voters, suggesting that subs are, as Dinsdale suggests, down. no it doesn't. and no it doesn't. christ. please do not tell lies about me.
Benny Ohu wrote:Benny, I know your tiny brain struggles with subtle concepts like me stating 'I don't see this happening, but...' and then saying that if NPC stations are really going to be destructible, i don't see this happening, but i'm going to perpetuate a ridiculous, alarmist rumour, present wild speculation and assumptions as if they were supported by evidence, even after that speculation is denied by an authoritative source. i'm then going to present more baseless conspiracy theories in an attempt to validate the rumours. i don't believe it myself, though.
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Benny seemed deeply offended when I implied that CCP might deny changes that people would find objectionable until the release, thus avoiding a negative impact on it's half year earning statement. the conspiracy theories won't stop from happening  |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10733
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 07:39:00 -
[467] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Ok, La Bar mitsvah, let me ask you a question, which is more economically sensible, to buy two highly trained toons and put them on your main account as alts, or set up two alt accounts to keep your super caps on? Because if you're tooling around in a supercap you're probably not swinging solo. I know there are guys that do, but most are in alliances.
Or are you actually suggesting that goonswarm really is just five guys multiboxing?
You're also implying that your killmails about bagging super caps when blowing up POS are a lie, btw.
Okay, so when you have the ISK for a supercap "which is more economically viable" is probably not a question you're terribly concerned about Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Aivo Dresden
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
348
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 09:16:00 -
[468] - Quote
All 3 of my votes are in there. Good stuff. |

Prince Kobol
1706
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 10:02:00 -
[469] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Malcanis wrote:
I know what the voter figures are this year, and it's a large enough number to make meaningful choices between a decent sized candidate pool. If only a fraction of EVE players want to make the effort and take responsibility for informing themselves sufficiently to make a meaningful vote, then tbh, I'm kind of OK with that as long as the voter pool is big enough. And I think that it is.
But let's be honest with ourselves here: most people don't vote because they simply don't care enough and so can't be bothered. Most of the shallow cynicism and hostility towards the CSM is basically a tissue-thin wrapper around this obvious turd.
I have voted each year expect this year because from what I saw the pool to choose from was well.. awful. I believed that it did not matter who was voted in as they are all cut from the same cloth and many of the candidates are people who failed to get into previous CSM's. On top of this none of them particularly did a good job of selling themselves. . That is not CCP fault and it is not the concept of the CSM at fault. If not enough worth while candidates are running for CSM then you have to ask the question why? Is it because they believe no matter how good their campaign might be, they would never be able to over come the block vote? Is it because they do not believe that the CSM have any real power to guide CCP and if so why do they believe that? As for not caring, why do players not care? What is it that makes the majority of players not give a rats ass about the CSM. I have never seen anybody from CCP really try and get a handle on this. Why have CCP never sent out a questionnaire to all subscribers asking them their thoughts on the CSM I do not know. There are things CCP could do to try and find out why the players are not interested if they really do care about the credibility of the CSM and being months late with the meeting minutes does not help. I actually believe that CSM8 was the best CSM we have ever had and had the best chance ever to really show the player base how effective a CSM can be, however CCP once again let them down and that appears to be a recurring theme with the entire CSM concept. Well 5 of CSM8 have been re-elected; CSM9 can't be that bad.
Just not as good as CSM 8 :)
That kind of also goes back to my point on why maybe people are just not interested in the CSM, its the same people over and over again.
If the majority of the player base view the CSM as a waste of time and they are showing this by not voting, then having the same people each year either on or involved in the CSM is not going to help.
Also could you guys take your playground arguments about supers else where.. this was a fairly good thread until you guys shitted it up...
|

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3201
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 10:19:00 -
[470] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Malcanis wrote:Well 5 of CSM8 have been re-elected; CSM9 can't be that bad. Just not as good as CSM 8 :) That kind of also goes back to my point on why maybe people are just not interested in the CSM, its the same people over and over again. If the majority of the player base view the CSM as a waste of time and they are showing this by not voting, then having the same people each year either on or involved in the CSM is not going to help. members of csm9 who have served more than one term: |

Prince Kobol
1706
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 10:50:00 -
[471] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Malcanis wrote:Well 5 of CSM8 have been re-elected; CSM9 can't be that bad. Just not as good as CSM 8 :) That kind of also goes back to my point on why maybe people are just not interested in the CSM, its the same people over and over again. If the majority of the player base view the CSM as a waste of time and they are showing this by not voting, then having the same people each year either on or involved in the CSM is not going to help. members of csm9 who have served more than one term:
Mangala Solaris - CSM 8
Ali Aras - CSM 8
Mynnna - CSM 8
Progodlegend - CSM 8
Now go back and see how many of this years candidates have unsuccessfully run for CSM over the years and I bet a few of the names appear again and again.
If people do not have any belief that the CSM are effective then having the same people run again and again will not help.
For me CSM 8 was the best we have in every respect and yet the voter turn out is lower by a third.
So the question has to be asked, how after the best CSM we have ever had has voter turn out dropped by a third.
What has happened to make the player base so despondent that even by having the best CSM to date, people are voting less.
For me the blame is solely on CCP for this.
I do not see anything more the CSM 8 member could do. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5955
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 11:22:00 -
[472] - Quote
Voter turn out is lower because people won't stop crying.
Because there are some deluded people who actually listen to the doomsayers, and who get this gigantic circlejerk going where they pat each other on the backs saying "there there, our vote wouldn't have mattered anyway" while bemoaning that anyone from outside of highsec is allowed to vote at all.
Meanwhile, lowsec makes THE strongest showing that it ever has. Because getting out the vote actually works. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3201
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 11:29:00 -
[473] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Malcanis wrote:Well 5 of CSM8 have been re-elected; CSM9 can't be that bad. Just not as good as CSM 8 :) That kind of also goes back to my point on why maybe people are just not interested in the CSM, its the same people over and over again. If the majority of the player base view the CSM as a waste of time and they are showing this by not voting, then having the same people each year either on or involved in the CSM is not going to help. members of csm9 who have served more than one term: Mangala Solaris - CSM 8 Ali Aras - CSM 8 Mynnna - CSM 8 Progodlegend - CSM 8 none of those members have served more than one term.
Quote:Now go back and see how many of this years candidates have unsuccessfully run for CSM over the years and I bet a few of the names appear again and again. no. you do it. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15433
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 11:30:00 -
[474] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Malcanis wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Malcanis wrote:
I know what the voter figures are this year, and it's a large enough number to make meaningful choices between a decent sized candidate pool. If only a fraction of EVE players want to make the effort and take responsibility for informing themselves sufficiently to make a meaningful vote, then tbh, I'm kind of OK with that as long as the voter pool is big enough. And I think that it is.
But let's be honest with ourselves here: most people don't vote because they simply don't care enough and so can't be bothered. Most of the shallow cynicism and hostility towards the CSM is basically a tissue-thin wrapper around this obvious turd.
I have voted each year expect this year because from what I saw the pool to choose from was well.. awful. I believed that it did not matter who was voted in as they are all cut from the same cloth and many of the candidates are people who failed to get into previous CSM's. On top of this none of them particularly did a good job of selling themselves. . That is not CCP fault and it is not the concept of the CSM at fault. If not enough worth while candidates are running for CSM then you have to ask the question why? Is it because they believe no matter how good their campaign might be, they would never be able to over come the block vote? Is it because they do not believe that the CSM have any real power to guide CCP and if so why do they believe that? As for not caring, why do players not care? What is it that makes the majority of players not give a rats ass about the CSM. I have never seen anybody from CCP really try and get a handle on this. Why have CCP never sent out a questionnaire to all subscribers asking them their thoughts on the CSM I do not know. There are things CCP could do to try and find out why the players are not interested if they really do care about the credibility of the CSM and being months late with the meeting minutes does not help. I actually believe that CSM8 was the best CSM we have ever had and had the best chance ever to really show the player base how effective a CSM can be, however CCP once again let them down and that appears to be a recurring theme with the entire CSM concept. Well 5 of CSM8 have been re-elected; CSM9 can't be that bad. Just not as good as CSM 8 :) That kind of also goes back to my point on why maybe people are just not interested in the CSM, its the same people over and over again. If the majority of the player base view the CSM as a waste of time and they are showing this by not voting, then having the same people each year either on or involved in the CSM is not going to help.
Well what do you even want? First you complain that CSM8 was the bestest awesomeest and that CSM9 can't possibly be as good, and then when it's shown that 5/19 of CSM8 are still serving, you complain about it being the same old faces.
And it's the same with just about all the other bitching about the CSM. People want CCP to give them more information, but they complain about how much information they have to read already. People say they want the CSM to have more publicity but they don't want to read devblogs or forums or receive evemails about it. People want the CSM to have more hi-sec/lo-sec/pony-sec members but they won't actually god damb vote for hi/lo/pony candidates.
Mostly people who complain about the CSM seem to just want "free candy": 14 people who 100% agree with them to put in an infinite amount of free work on their behalf without ever asking them to make any effort to inform themselves or make choices.
God forbid that they listen to anyone who tries to be honest with them about the reality of the situation or lift a goddamb finger to get what they say they want. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15434
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 11:36:00 -
[475] - Quote
Oh thank god, it's gone
free at last "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3201
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 11:38:00 -
[476] - Quote
what's gone |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10734
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 11:40:00 -
[477] - Quote
I still see the CSM tag Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
481
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 15:23:00 -
[478] - Quote
Andski wrote: Okay, so when you have the ISK for a supercap "which is more economically viable" is probably not a question you're terribly concerned about
If you only have the isk for 'a supercap' at the point I'm at, you really need to start asking that question. Or stop blowing your isk on Blue Pill and Exotic Dancers. One of the two. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15434
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 15:30:00 -
[479] - Quote
dambit "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5957
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 15:35:00 -
[480] - Quote
When he finally does lose that CSM tag, it will be interesting to say the least. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2996
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 15:51:00 -
[481] - Quote
I need to see you completely lose it on the forums, especially if you decide you need a break. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2268
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 17:25:00 -
[482] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
Well what do you even want? First you complain that CSM8 was the bestest awesomeest and that CSM9 can't possibly be as good, and then when it's shown that 5/19 of CSM8 are still serving, you complain about it being the same old faces.
And it's the same with just about all the other bitching about the CSM. People want CCP to give them more information, but they complain about how much information they have to read already. People say they want the CSM to have more publicity but they don't want to read devblogs or forums or receive evemails about it. People want the CSM to have more hi-sec/lo-sec/pony-sec members but they won't actually god damb vote for hi/lo/pony candidates.
Mostly people who complain about the CSM seem to just want "free candy": 14 people who 100% agree with them to put in an infinite amount of free work on their behalf without ever asking them to make any effort to inform themselves or make choices.
God forbid that they listen to anyone who tries to be honest with them about the reality of the situation or lift a goddamb finger to get what they say they want.
I want CCP to give CSM members more room with the NDA and remove the self-DOX requirement. I think the NDA prevents the CSM from getting proper credit for things and the self-DOX is an idiotic safety risk. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2268
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 17:26:00 -
[483] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Andski wrote: Okay, so when you have the ISK for a supercap "which is more economically viable" is probably not a question you're terribly concerned about
If you only have the isk for ' a supercap' at the point I'm at, you really need to start asking that question. Or stop blowing your isk on Blue Pill and Exotic Dancers. One of the two. Malcanis wrote:Oh thank god, it's gone
free at last I cleared my cache, and no, you're still tagged as a CSM.
Quoting so you can't edit this wonderful display of lack of knowledge. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15435
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 17:33:00 -
[484] - Quote
Well he's right I still am for some reason.
No doubt LeeLoo will fix this terrible oversight before I do something awful to disgrace the institution.
Clock's ticking, LeeLoo.... "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
1399
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 17:55:00 -
[485] - Quote
lol, Malc got Drafted ! |

Sephira Galamore
Inner Beard Society Affirmative.
334
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 22:09:00 -
[486] - Quote
Silly guess, but you didn't let them hire you, did you? |

Dave Stark
5501
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 22:11:00 -
[487] - Quote
Sephira Galamore wrote:Silly guess, but you didn't let them hire you, did you? nonsense, malc isn't so easily bribed. |

Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
15441
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 22:15:00 -
[488] - Quote
Sephira Galamore wrote:Silly guess, but you didn't let them hire you, did you?
Christ no. I've just been a little burned out is all.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
593
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 23:38:00 -
[489] - Quote
Mal well done as a CSM and CCP please give this man his eve soul back. Well come back to the living. By the way great Fanfest.
Black |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: [one page] |