EVE Search - BOARDING SKILL , UNITS & SHIPS

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

BOARDING SKILL , UNITS & SHIPS

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Zirconium Blade Ass Pounding Space Monkeys	Posted - 2008.06.24 17:47:00 - [91] Why not just request that when you blow up a ship it gets moved directly to your hangar, fitings and all?
Marcus Gideon Excessive Force	Posted - 2008.06.24 20:51:00 - [92] OOH OOH OOH... How about this! I lock onto your ship with this module, and then I pound you into dust. And just when your ship is about to POP... I get your Insurance money deposited into my account, and your ship goes back to full health. THEN I get to do it all over again, since I already have you Targeted, Webbed, Scrambled, and Jammed. I reduce you back down to nothing, and the computer AUTOMATICALLY deducts the cost of your ship and fitted modules from your Wallet. See, the Insurance bought you another try. And every try thereafter is buying you a new fitting from the local markets. GENIUS I TELL YA --- Five Green Dots - One Red Dot = Happy Drones
Ditadit	Posted - 2008.06.25 06:47:00 - [93] Edited by: Ditadit on 25/06/2008 06:47:56 Originally by: Marcus Gideon OOH OOH OOH... How about this! I lock onto your ship with this module, and then I pound you into dust. And just when your ship is about to POP... I get your Insurance money deposited into my account, and your ship goes back to full health. THEN I get to do it all over again, since I already have you Targeted, Webbed, Scrambled, and Jammed. I reduce you back down to nothing, and the computer AUTOMATICALLY deducts the cost of your ship and fitted modules from your Wallet. See, the Insurance bought you another try. And every try thereafter is buying you a new fitting from the local markets. GENIUS I TELL YA That could be an interesting idea. Sadly up to now you still haven't given an objetive argument in disfavour of boarding. All you do is moan and make ridiculous statements.
Ditadit	Posted - 2008.06.25 06:52:00 - [94] Originally by: Marcus Gideon ... this sounds like a programming nightmare. ..... . My bad you did say one thing actually usefull since you starting trolling around here.
Dexant	Posted - 2008.06.25 06:57:00 - [95] Originally by: Mighty Baz Edited by: Mighty Baz on 21/12/2007 15:55:12 hi all plz consider and imagine what will be happend if some special units - e.g. recon or covert or (destroyer, assault frigate) ...could be able to board some ships - wow - it'll be fantastic when cloked covert could capture battleship or another enemy ship by commandos (marines?)without any shoot...really nice idea how about i take over your ship so you cant take over mine take cover old players NOOBS take your fleet over !!! What do you think about it?
Mighty Baz HUSARIA Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.25 10:22:00 - [96] Edited by: Mighty Baz on 25/06/2008 10:23:08 No insurance, because of scams...if ship will be capturing, only one case could be allowed to pay isk back -self destruction. It could be balance between time of boarding and self destroying time. More boarding ships increase odds (time) to capture it...so if you are alone without any escorts or anti-boarding moduls or scouts you are the next victim...I'm sorry but Eve is the same like rl arent? To protect noobs the boarding could be allowed in low sec and 0.0 space, only. I like if the environment is much more aggressive than now. Too many carebeers are flying around. The game cannot be the next mutant of SIMs family. That proposal seems attractive, because players face a new one challenge ingame. I hope there is no obstacle to implement it soon.
Marcus Gideon Excessive Force	Posted - 2008.06.25 12:00:00 - [97] Originally by: Ditadit Originally by: Marcus Gideon ... this sounds like a programming nightmare. ..... . My bad you did say one thing actually usefull since you starting trolling around here. Oh, I've given my fair share of intelligent replies to "Boarding" It's just on the OTHER FIVE HUNDRED threads that have come before yours. You're not original, nor is this idea. It's a horrible idea, and everyone but the authors seem to agree. Nano AFK/Cloak IED Storm Chaser
Ditadit	Posted - 2008.06.25 13:23:00 - [98] Originally by: Crumplecorn Originally by: Mighty Baz Guyz why do you think like that? It ll be not stolen but covered. If this possibility will be available to take ship over that as a result it could be ability to defence ship in the similar way. hm? I'm not quite sure what you mean. As in the marines invade the enemy ship and your crew tries to fight them off? So the battle consists of sitting next to each other in space while the crews (which you can't see) fight in some abstract fashion. I'm getting bored just imagining that. You won't be bored, you'll still be trying to prevent the enemy ship from getting away or pounding yours (save if you ecm him to death) while your marine platoons do their jobs. You'll also be spamming the scanner and your intel channel to ensure your victim's buddies don't rock up to the rescue.
Ditadit	Posted - 2008.06.25 13:33:00 - [99] Originally by: Reggie Stoneloader I don't like the idea of a cloaked ship being able to fly up to me and steal my ship. I don't think it should be as such either. I would rather see boarding being done by fleet that would have "by traditional means", completely destroyed the victim. Boarding equiment should in my opinion leave so little in the wise of pg and/or cpu that not much else could fitted on the boarding ship. Alternatively a specialised boarding ship could be created that is the only type of ship capacle of using a boarding module (and T2 destroyer maybe), this would force a boarding fleet to have more than one ship (save if you're trying to take a rookie ship).
Ditadit	Posted - 2008.06.25 13:38:00 - [100] Originally by: Marcus Gideon Oh, I've given my fair share of intelligent replies to "Boarding" It's just on the OTHER FIVE HUNDRED threads that have come before yours. You're not original, nor is this idea. It's a horrible idea, and everyone but the authors seem to agree. Why don't you link them intstead of trolling. If your convinced that I'm total dolt make a new topic called "I think Ditadit is an imbecile" and post there instead.
Ditadit	Posted - 2008.06.25 13:45:00 - [101] Originally by: Mighty Baz The same way could be use in POS warfare. The following equipment will be needed to capture POS - hacking POS modul To be fair, boarding should be much more difficult than just destroying the entity you'd want to take over. Considering how tough it is to destroy a POS, taking over it would be nearly impossible.
Rhanna Khurin	Posted - 2008.06.25 13:51:00 - [102] I support this idea, but not to capture ships, only to set explosives or set off self destruct systems.
Marcus Gideon Excessive Force	Posted - 2008.06.25 16:04:00 - [103] Originally by: Ditadit Originally by: Marcus Gideon Oh, I've given my fair share of intelligent replies to "Boarding" It's just on the OTHER FIVE HUNDRED threads that have come before yours. You're not original, nor is this idea. It's a horrible idea, and everyone but the authors seem to agree. Why don't you link them intstead of trolling. If your convinced that I'm total dolt make a new topic called "I think Ditadit is an imbecile" and post there instead. You might want to seek therapy... Your insecurity is blantly obvious by the number of times you've posted in a row. You like hearing yourself speak, for some odd reason. Here's some intelligent response for you though, just cus you asked nice. Boarding would require entirely new mechanics. Not only would you need Marine ammo for your Boarding Module, but we'd need sockets similar to fittings, to have defined Crew. In which case, you would have all the same features as regular combat. Boarding parties that use Battering Rams (Kinetic), Cutting Torches (Thermal), Breaching Charges (Explosive), and Hacking (EM). Then you'd have Crew and Systems that would Tank against such intrusions. OR... your already installed Tanks could protect the inside of the ship just as they do the outside. In which case, a decently Tanked ship will never be taken over, because all the attempts would be Resisted and Repaired before any progress is made. Besides, I'd stock my Crew Manifest with Cyborg Ninja Pred-Aliens. Nano AFK/Cloak IED Storm Chaser
Mighty Baz HUSARIA Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.26 08:33:00 - [104] Originally by: Marcus Gideon You might want to seek therapy... Your insecurity is blantly obvious by the number of times you've posted in a row. You like hearing yourself speak, for some odd reason. Here's some intelligent response for you though, just cus you asked nice. be careful dude, nobody wants everybody annoy or harm here, because of new ideas. There is open forum for everyone...

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.