| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Zaphod Jones
Celtic Anarchy Black Reign Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.08.17 17:28:00 -
[181]
So, has anyone from ISS come forward and said we don't use that software anymore ?
or did I miss it in all the kerfuffle about credit cards ?
|

Mistress Suffering
Einherjar Rising Dusk and Dawn
|
Posted - 2006.08.17 17:47:00 -
[182]
I believe ISSN stated that they use an equivelent, but are not widely hated and thus basically slipped under the radar.
This whole conversation is pointless. The goons could eat babies (like Iron does, but I like them) and CCP wouldn't punt thousands of their paid subscribers.
My hope is that they will instead make this sort of functionality part of the actual client, so the rest of us can benefit from it too. Constant show-info is cumbersome and not fun. Please make my game experience more enjoyable, thanks.
|

Damfoose
FISKL GUARDS Freelancer Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.08.17 18:43:00 -
[183]
Intresting thread some very good points also the usual bad ones, CCP intergrate something like this into the game im getting sick of going to hit show info only so see oops start convo !!!!!!!!!!!!
|

CCP HOSTILE
|
Posted - 2006.08.17 21:04:00 -
[184]
Wooot! You really believe that they will succumb to our pleas for a better game ? No, they just add co called untested "Addons & Features" to keep the steady bug flow in the game. And please, let those $$ roll into their already fat wallets.
Originally by: CCP doesn't care! FUN...remember that module CCP? Urgent CCP Attention! Or do you just opress with Sinister Bans for Criticizing you?
|

K Shara
Caldari Contraband Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2006.08.18 07:40:00 -
[185]
if ISSN use it they should be banned as well.
lets hope the coming patch fixes this
|

Alex Tremayne
Lyrus Associates Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.08.18 08:17:00 -
[186]
Originally by: K Shara if ISSN use it they should be banned as well.
lets hope the coming patch fixes this
This concerns me. I'd like confirmation from ISSN that they aren't using this mod.
|

Count TaSessine
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.08.18 09:21:00 -
[187]
Official word: ISS Navy does not use this application or whatever it is.
Chairman, ISS

|

Dracolich
North Star Networks Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2006.08.18 09:46:00 -
[188]
I look forward to the many banned accounts. _______________________________________
Does killing the weak, make you feel strong? |

Zaphod Jones
Celtic Anarchy Black Reign Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.08.18 09:58:00 -
[189]
Originally by: Count TaSessine Official word: ISS Navy does not use this application or whatever it is.
Thank you for the verification on ISSN's present stance.
|

Laudicia
|
Posted - 2006.08.18 10:02:00 -
[190]
lol they should do a scan and BAN them all ^^
|

StarStryder
Wise Guys
|
Posted - 2006.08.18 11:53:00 -
[191]
Originally by: Wild Rho And yet when you log out you disappear from local and when you log in you reappear, how do the gates "log" that change then? (If you want to start using rp based arguments).
Simple. Your ship informs the gate network when you turn your bedside lamp on and off. :D
|

StarStryder
Wise Guys
|
Posted - 2006.08.18 14:18:00 -
[192]
Originally by: Dropzone 187
I also think CCP might want to consider opening up the client for modifications. First, look at other software titles that have had their games expand - CounterStrike, Quakes, Total Annihilation, etc. It also promotes a stronger community, and as we all know CCP is short staffed so it couldn't hurt to have additional resources floating around. It is all for a better game.
Last time I played CS on a public server it was unplayable due to all the cheats. This is the price of opening clients up external developers and quite frankly I'd rather have a client that is free from cheats (I know, a fanciful dream!) than one which is easy for third party devs to extend. As Avon said, it doesn't work so well on a single server environment anyway.
|

K Shara
Caldari Contraband Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2006.08.19 14:43:00 -
[193]
what he said.
no to 3rd party mods
everyone on the same playing field with teh same kit
|

Katya Ishenka
|
Posted - 2006.08.20 12:40:00 -
[194]
so is anything been donew about this ?
|

Rose Kolodny
Gallente Space Invaders
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 13:30:00 -
[195]
Originally by: K Shara well the GM's say its a sploit so its a sploit
anyone using it is sploiting and shiuld be banned :)
Yeah, right. I remeber Pann saying all m0o should get banned and I remeber CCP saying using sensor dampeners is a bannable offence cause they were too lazy to fix the bugs. GMs never give free ships away either, they are gods that never fail.
What's next? -- Recruiting Video - Recruiting Thread |

Twilight Moon
Minmatar eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 13:32:00 -
[196]
Originally by: Zaphod Jones
Originally by: Count TaSessine Official word: ISS Navy does not use this application or whatever it is.
Thank you for the verification on ISSN's present stance.
Do you know that your sig isn't working?
You might still be seeing it due to it being cached.
...on the other hand using a banana might be a viable alternative.
|

Kylania
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 13:39:00 -
[197]
Originally by: Twilight Moon Do you know that your sig isn't working?
Read it carefully, it's working.  -- Lil Miner Newbie Skills Roadmap | CCG Card Lookup |

Ifni
Developmental Neogenics Amalgamated
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 14:42:00 -
[198]
Edited by: Ifni on 21/08/2006 14:45:06 There are several things that are crossing the line between legitimate and not.
Whilst looking at these images you can see what is meant about the Goonfleet setup, BOB uses a similar thing, albeit, not one that is active ingame, as far as I know.
The Goonfleet one uses harvested character ID's and replaces the downloaded character portrait with one that denotes standings, corp/alliance etc, in a quick and easy to read manner. The BOB one is also known as The Intel Project and uses harvested charactr ID's aswell.
The difference here, is that, as far as I know, the Intel Project one uses it to gather data on a player and their corps, etc, as can be seen here. Note the corp ticker displayed. This is done by leaving an alt parked in a highway system, with the logserver running. Everytime someone appears on your grid, the server relays information between clients and subsequently stores it in a log. You have several items displayed on the overview, so this data has to come to your pc.
Whilst they are both using, I would imagine, the logs generated by CCP's own logserver, and using the data within them, both cross that line into a grey area that isn't clearly enough defined by tha EULA.
With many people obviously interested in a resolution to this, maybe CCP can come up wiht some method to prevent a user reading the logserver data, and extracting character ID's from it, and from altering the character portraits.
In my defence, I may be wrong about some of what I have said, and they may be similar to the methods employed by Chribba and EVE-Search
It's your turn to die. |

Blacklight
Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 15:25:00 -
[199]
Originally by: Ifni Edited by: Ifni on 21/08/2006 14:45:06 There are several things that are crossing the line between legitimate and not.
Whilst looking at these images you can see what is meant about the Goonfleet setup, BOB uses a similar thing, albeit, not one that is active ingame, as far as I know.
The Goonfleet one uses harvested character ID's and replaces the downloaded character portrait with one that denotes standings, corp/alliance etc, in a quick and easy to read manner. The BOB one is also known as The Intel Project and uses harvested charactr ID's aswell.
The difference here, is that, as far as I know, the Intel Project one uses it to gather data on a player and their corps, etc, as can be seen here. Note the corp ticker displayed. This is done by leaving an alt parked in a highway system, with the logserver running. Everytime someone appears on your grid, the server relays information between clients and subsequently stores it in a log. You have several items displayed on the overview, so this data has to come to your pc.
Whilst they are both using, I would imagine, the logs generated by CCP's own logserver, and using the data within them, both cross that line into a grey area that isn't clearly enough defined by tha EULA.
With many people obviously interested in a resolution to this, maybe CCP can come up wiht some method to prevent a user reading the logserver data, and extracting character ID's from it, and from altering the character portraits.
In my defence, I may be wrong about some of what I have said, and they may be similar to the methods employed by Chribba and EVE-Search
Comparing the fact that we auto-populate a corp ticker on our forums with Goons replacing client files is pretty out of whack Ifni. BoB have no tools whatsoever that alter any client or server related data in any way shape or form. Using data made publically available by CCP & 'right click, export to excel' does not equal altering the client and to be honest I resent being associated by implication, you're out of order in the way you present this argument.
We do not, either through our forums or otherwise breach the EULA by altering the in-game environment in any way.
I think you need to apologise or clarify what your point is by dragging us into this argument because you are way out of line comparing us to Goons little client hacking activities.
Eve Blacklight Style
|

spurious signal
Caldari Brainiacs
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 15:34:00 -
[200]
Originally by: Count TaSessine Official word: ISS Navy does not use this application or whatever it is.
Has anyone asked if you or the ISSN ever used it, or any client-altering tools, in the past?
|

Deja Thoris
Contraband Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 15:56:00 -
[201]
Meh,
If this is an exploit then please ban the people who posted SS's of themselves using it.
Whats that you say? You don't accept their submissions as evidence to wield the banstick and you cant detect it yourself?
So...
It's an exploit but you cant detect or punish it...
|

Ifni
Developmental Neogenics Amalgamated
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 16:07:00 -
[202]
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: Ifni In my defence, I may be wrong about some of what I have said, and they may be similar to the methods employed by Chribba and EVE-Search
Comparing the fact that we auto-populate a corp ticker on our forums with Goons replacing client files is pretty out of whack Ifni. BoB have no tools whatsoever that alter any client or server related data in any way shape or form. Using data made publically available by CCP & 'right click, export to excel' does not equal altering the client and to be honest I resent being associated by implication, you're out of order in the way you present this argument.
We do not, either through our forums or otherwise breach the EULA by altering the in-game environment in any way.
I think you need to apologise or clarify what your point is by dragging us into this argument because you are way out of line comparing us to Goons little client hacking activities.
i wasn't using it as an anti-BOB platform, and I did say that I might be wrong.
What I am getting at is taking data used ingame that hasn't been necessarily been marked for use, by the player, outside of game in the same way the "export to excel" for market data has.
I understand that my argument doesn't sound that clearly defined and I apologise for insulting you by association, but I'm trying to show that without clear cut guidelines on what can, and can not be used, by the player, outside of the EVE environment, things such as Goonfleets actions, occur.
Whilst It would be excellent and would please almost all those present in this thread, if CCP were to introduce some hash checking or similar for character portraits, I am proposing extending it to clarify the uses that data generated by the game has outside of the EVE client.
As far as I know, the EULA hasn't been modified in its original text since the inception of EVE all those years ago. Maybe it is time to clarify what is allowed in light of modern advances and technology that exists today...
It's your turn to die. |

Turiya Flesharrower
Beagle Corp
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 16:08:00 -
[203]
Edited by: Turiya Flesharrower on 21/08/2006 16:10:42
Originally by: Blacklight
Comparing the fact that we auto-populate a corp ticker on our forums with Goons replacing client files is pretty out of whack Ifni. BoB have no tools whatsoever that alter any client or server related data in any way shape or form. Using data made publically available by CCP & 'right click, export to excel' does not equal altering the client and to be honest I resent being associated by implication, you're out of order in the way you present this argument.
We do not, either through our forums or otherwise breach the EULA by altering the in-game environment in any way.
I think you need to apologise or clarify what your point is by dragging us into this argument because you are way out of line comparing us to Goons little client hacking activities.
Direct from the EULA:
You may not use your own or third-party software to modify any content appearing within the Game environment or change how the Game is played.
BoB's information gathering system doesn't actually modify the game environment or how the game is played so the comparison to GoonSwarm's system is pushing it I think. On the other hand, I don't think this is worth getting into a hissy fit over; the difference is plain to see in Ifni's post thanks to screenshots.
I think the main point of conjecture is the legitimacy of information harvesting in any form and BoB's system is just being cited as an example of what's possible.
-----
|

Shaemell Buttleson
Euphoria Released Euphoria Unleashed
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 17:12:00 -
[204]
Mining macros are sh1tty and wrong is clearly banned by ccp but doesn't in anyway interfere with the server etc. They give players and unfair advantage over others who choose to play the game as intended.
Logicly (to my twisted mind) allthough these portrait programs don't interfere as such with the server, they do change the gameplay in an unfair way that the majority of the playerbase don't stoop to use and give a tactical advantage to the users. On this alone they should be banned just like the mining macros!
|

FireFoxx80
Caldari E X O D U S Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 17:27:00 -
[205]
That BoB thing is pretty smart. And yes, certainly in a grey area of the EULA.
I might have to investigate something similar myself 
What I do the rest of the time. |

Avon
Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 17:35:00 -
[206]
Originally by: Turiya Flesharrower
I think the main point of conjecture is the legitimacy of information harvesting in any form and BoB's system is just being cited as an example of what's possible.
Oh, like for example, killmails? Would you argue that killboards violate the EULA?
There is a huge difference between taking stuff out of the game and putting stuff in to the game.
The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
|

Laughlyn Vaughns
Gallente Lagos-Vaughn Industries
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 17:43:00 -
[207]
i cant imagine too much being done if/when they find a tracin method of who is using it, sure maybe if it was a corp of about 30.
Imagine if they ban 70% goonfleet for a week, their enemies would go in and take over their territory and am sure when they got back wouldnt be too impressed about it and a lot of whining causing a bit of an uproar as well as plenty of petitions. Yer they shudnt use it but i imagine a bit more favor between the devs and large alliances like Goon and BoB, afterall they do supply devs with a good amount of their monthly pay check.
|

Deja Thoris
Contraband Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 17:48:00 -
[208]
Originally by: Laughlyn Vaughns
Imagine if they ban 70% goonfleet for a week, their enemies would go in and take over their territory
What territory?
|

Laughlyn Vaughns
Gallente Lagos-Vaughn Industries
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 18:07:00 -
[209]
Originally by: Deja Thoris
Originally by: Laughlyn Vaughns
Imagine if they ban 70% goonfleet for a week, their enemies would go in and take over their territory
What territory?
whatever area of space they stomp around in, cant imagine them not trying to claim any area of space as their own sicne mojarity of other alliances all have
|

Avon
Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.08.21 18:09:00 -
[210]
Originally by: Laughlyn Vaughns
whatever area of space they stomp around in, cant imagine them not trying to claim any area of space as their own sicne mojarity of other alliances all have
Er, we evicted them.
The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |