| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
1015
   |
Posted - 2014.12.02 21:45:15 -
[91] - Quote
tracking disruptors need a nerf , mind you most e-war does beside ecm .. especially with drones being so strong atm, makes ecm less useful..
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Goldensaver
Lom Corporation
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
407
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 00:27:19 -
[92] - Quote
TrouserDeagle wrote:Templar Dane wrote:TrouserDeagle wrote:nobody cares about tracking. you have no range because tracking disruptors exist, so you cannot shoot kitescum. As someone who has spent quite a bit of time in a coercer, a ship with a 50% tracking bonus, I can say that tracking is an issue. An ab frigate or one with a TD can get under it's guns, even when fitted with pulse lasers, and it has a pretty big bonus the confessor doesn't.... fit a web. +150% tracking speed if you're sitting still, more if you're moving.
Probably one of my favourite uses of the new mid slot.
Now on the Coercer, that's unfortunately not an option. It's really a shame. |
Reynas Arthie
The Church of Awesome
Caldari State Capturing
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 01:05:18 -
[93] - Quote
Every ship setup that I have flown with Small focused pulse lasers can pretty much be fitted with small focussed beam lasers with little to no fitting modification.
And on top of it all the current small beams give me almost identical DPS if the right crystals are selected.
The new beam lasers are going to give so much more it is great!
EAT LASER SCUM!! |
Ashlar Vellum
24th Imperial Crusade
Amarr Empire
128
|
Posted - 2014.12.05 09:25:01 -
[94] - Quote
Fozzie why -10% tracking , is it 'cause of +10% optimal? |
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
824
|
Posted - 2014.12.05 15:25:44 -
[95] - Quote
Schneevva wrote:Bronson Hughes wrote:I'd wager that the small rails and small arties will get looked at when the other T3 destroyers get released, which may well include turret-wide balances like the Scorch change. Why exactly would this happen?
Given that the small beam and scorch changes were timed to coincide with the release of the first D3, it seems that CCP is taking their balance rather seriously and will likely tweak other D3 weapon systems accordingly.
Mind you, this is pure speculation.
CCP Falcon's thoughts on suicide ganking.
Reading Comprehension: so important it deserves it's own skillbook.
I want to create content, not become content.
|
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance
Team Amarrica
466
|
Posted - 2014.12.07 15:58:02 -
[96] - Quote
TrouserDeagle wrote:nobody cares about tracking. you have no range because tracking disruptors exist, so you cannot shoot kitescum.
yea your right, nobody cares about tracking anymore. since the game has come full circle.
everybody uses drones and missiles now thus condors are not longer using dual tracking disruptors enmass they are using sensor damps now.
Amarr Militia Representative - A jar of nitro
|
Celthric Kanerian
Ascendance Of New Eden
Workers Trade Federation
153
|
Posted - 2014.12.14 13:50:05 -
[97] - Quote
Always used pulse lasers since day 1.
Now would probably be a good idea to check out beams.... |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |