EVE Search - Some Minor changes

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Some Minor changes

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)

Tuxford	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:20:00 - [1] I've been replying to the forums today. I'm just gonna list some of the smaller tweaks and changes here. Ships Powergrid of Sacrilege, Deimos and Muninn increased to 1100MW, 950MW and 1100MW respectively CPU of Sacrilege and Deimos increased to 350tf for both ships CPU of Anathema, Helios and Cheetah increased to 280tf, 290tf and 275tf respectively bonus of covert ops ships changed so it reduces cpu need of covert ops cloaking device from 98% to 100% Agility of battlecruisers and command ships boosted by 20% Nighthawk's explosion velocity changed to launcher rate of fire bonus Modules Inertia stabilizers give decrease in mass as well as agility and give a penalty to signature radius This is all I can remember for now. _______________

Audrea Momentum.	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:25:00 - [2] YAY! ------------------ Save Deimos!
Lucus Ranger Gallente The Scope	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:26:00 - [3] Whoot!!
Caol Minmatar Privateers	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:27:00 - [4] Originally by: Tuxford This is all I can remember for now. More to come soon?

Tuxford	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:28:00 - [5] Yeah but probably not until after the weekend. _______________

Audrea Momentum.	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:31:00 - [6] Originally by: Tuxford I've been replying to the forums today. I'm just gonna list some of the smaller tweaks and changes here. Ships Powergrid of Sacrilege, Deimos and Muninn increased to 1100MW, 950MW and 1100MW respectively CPU of Sacrilege and Deimos increased to 350tf for both ships bonus of covert ops ships changed so it reduces cpu need of covert ops cloaking device from 98% to 100% This is all I can remember for now. This is all very good Tux, but care to explain why do you think the Deimos doesnt deserve agility boost as well? Also, the bonus change to cov ops is only for cov ops or recons too? since its same bonus atm. ------------------ Save Deimos!
Caol Minmatar Privateers	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:31:00 - [7] Originally by: Tuxford Yeah but probably not until after the weekend. Okedokey
Grimpak Gallente Celestial Horizon Corp. Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:32:00 - [8] oh... deimos could use a bit of agility aswell. as for the rest yay \o/ ------- Originally by: Abdalion Originally by: Jebidus Skari What, in EVE, is a Tyrant? Me. Especially when it comes to troll threads.
Rasitiln Minmatar SniggWaffe	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:43:00 - [9] when are these changes going to occur? --------
Mitchman Omniscient Order	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:43:00 - [10] The Raven and Ishtar are in serious need of some CPU love. The raven can not be fitted with T2 gear without a cpu extender II (and forget about using the last to high slots if you use siege launchers). The ishtar needs faction hardeners to be able to fit a armor tank with some EW, disruptors or similar in med slots.

Idara Caldari Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:46:00 - [11] BC agility! WOOOO
Bombasy Gallente	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:48:00 - [12] Edited by: Bombasy on 11/10/2006 13:49:11 Originally by: Mitchman The Raven and Ishtar are in serious need of some CPU love. The raven can not be fitted with T2 gear without a cpu extender II (and forget about using the last to high slots if you use siege launchers). The ishtar needs faction hardeners to be able to fit a armor tank with some EW, disruptors or similar in med slots. You sir, are what we in the business call a retard, I hereby request you GTFO of my genepool. Your signature is inappropriate. If you have any questions, email us at [email protected] Tirg Your signature is inappropriate. Please email [email protected] if you want to know why -Eldo
El Yatta Caldari Mercenary Forces	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:50:00 - [13] Originally by: Mitchman The Raven and Ishtar are in serious need of some CPU love. The raven can not be fitted with T2 gear without a cpu extender II (and forget about using the last to high slots if you use siege launchers). The ishtar needs faction hardeners to be able to fit a armor tank with some EW, disruptors or similar in med slots. Respectfully disagree - they are both really very good, with their main drawback being those tiny fittings - seige and nos with a tank is a very tricky choice, t2 tank mods really burn CPU, and ishtar its all about wangling out the CPU for EW/hards, which is very fun to set up. ---\|\|---
Aurora Tagan Amarr	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:51:00 - [14] Sounds Awsome
Mila Prestoc	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:51:00 - [15] Some nice needed changes there mr Tux, i'm especially pleased with Muninn. BC agility will be nice to, AC Cyclone will move nicely. Originally by: Mitchman The Raven and Ishtar are in serious need of some CPU love. The raven can not be fitted with T2 gear without a cpu extender II (and forget about using the last to high slots if you use siege launchers). The ishtar needs faction hardeners to be able to fit a armor tank with some EW, disruptors or similar in med slots. In that case boost all BS's CPU as they can't fit everything T2... Be thankful for what you have already! Boosting Raven's LMAO, yeah right at least you don't have to use lows to tank so can afford to use a low for a CPU/Fitting mods. ------------------------- Originally by: "Lord Violent" EvE is slowly becoming a game for the stupid, catered to by devs as they lack ability to kill/survive anything.
Alex Harumichi Gallente Gradient Namtz'aar k'in	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:51:00 - [16] Edited by: Alex Harumichi on 11/10/2006 13:55:39 Sounds great, a lot of ships that needed help seem to be getting it A couple of questions/suggestions: 1) Like others, I'd also suggest a (small) agility boost to the Deimos, it needs it. 2) Do the inertia stabs really need a penalty? At the moment nobody uses them, with the mass decrease they might well become useful but if they also have a penalty... oh well, we'll see, depends on the actual values. 3) A couple of other ships in dire need of grid increase are the Ares and the Nemesis. They may need other help too, but at the moment their grid is totally crippling them (Nemesis is especially sad here, fit 2 cruise launchers on it and you're pretty much out of grid already :). The Ares is also crippled by the fact that it needs a MAPC or two to fit anything reasonable, effectively removing 1-2 lowslots from an already problematic inty.
Grimpak Gallente Celestial Horizon Corp. Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:51:00 - [17] Originally by: Mitchman The Raven and Ishtar are in serious need of some CPU love. The raven can not be fitted with T2 gear without a cpu extender II (and forget about using the last to high slots if you use siege launchers). The ishtar needs faction hardeners to be able to fit a armor tank with some EW, disruptors or similar in med slots. "I cannot fit full rack of the biggest Tier2 guns/best tanking mods without sacrifices. boost ship plzkthkx"? ------- Originally by: Abdalion Originally by: Jebidus Skari What, in EVE, is a Tyrant? Me. Especially when it comes to troll threads.
Alex Harumichi Gallente Gradient Namtz'aar k'in	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:53:00 - [18] Originally by: Mitchman The Raven and Ishtar are in serious need of some CPU love. The raven can not be fitted with T2 gear without a cpu extender II (and forget about using the last to high slots if you use siege launchers). The ishtar needs faction hardeners to be able to fit a armor tank with some EW, disruptors or similar in med slots. Please don't clutter this with needless requests for ships which are fine as is. The Ishtar and Raven quite definitely do not need help, they are solid. Nemesis, Ares, and maybe some others do -- I doubt anyone here will claim those ships are fine as they are.
Car Wars adeptus gattacus Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:53:00 - [19] Tux, Can you look at the stealth bombers too, they are pretty nerfed beyond use. Some powergrid/cpu would be nice. More speed bonus while cloaked. etc. There are plenty off threads about it.
Waagaa Ktlehr Amarr Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:54:00 - [20] Sounds like good changes so far. Can you look into Amarr battleship problems next please? A megathron can fit a full rack of 425 IIs, mwd, plate, medium armor rep without having to use any fitting mods at all and having enough cpu for damage mods / tracking stuff. When I try to set up my Apoc for fleets, I end up with 7 Tachs, mwd, medium rep 2 and fail to squeeze in everything because of CPU issues and have to fit an RCU2 to get comparable range and damage output to a mega or tempest. The geddon needs an mwd nowadays because of the megapulse range nerf and was clearly not balanced for it, it needs cpu love badly or we need to see a decrease in CPU use on beams. They're meant to be Grid hogs, not CPU hogs. (Yes, I do have eng / electronics / awu 5 and a -3% turret CPU implant) - - One ship to jam them all, one ship to damp them. One ship to suck them dry and in the dark void gank them.

Frools No Quarter. Axiom Empire	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:55:00 - [21] T1 amarr cruiser boost please
Alex Harumichi Gallente Gradient Namtz'aar k'in	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:55:00 - [22] Originally by: Car Wars Tux, Can you look at the stealth bombers too, they are pretty nerfed beyond use. Some powergrid/cpu would be nice. More speed bonus while cloaked. etc. There are plenty off threads about it. Yeah. While the Nemesis is the most clearly broken one, the others might need some basic grid/cpu help. The whole ship class migth need an overhaul, but I thing a grid/cpu boost would be a good start to see where things stand.
Ethidium Bromide ZEALOT WARRIORS AGAINST TERRORISTS Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2006.10.11 13:59:00 - [23] i can put decent stuff on my sacrilege now WOOT! my prophecy is not a lame sitting duck anymore WOOT! still won't fly my anathema Originally by: George Petsch Nochricht: Dei schwarer StroinlSser trifftn Karli[Baatzis] und ruiniert erm so richtig de Dosn, 1343.7 schhodn, oida. My sig is blue not pink although i can't argue with the slave part - Xorus wth whats this blue stuff all of a sudden? Did I miss a mail? -eris Bwahahahaha!11 Immy was here
Skinny Boy Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2006.10.11 14:01:00 - [24] Originally by: Waagaa Ktlehr Sounds like good changes so far. Can you look into Amarr battleship problems next please? A megathron can fit a full rack of 425 IIs, mwd, plate, medium armor rep without having to use any fitting mods at all and having enough cpu for damage mods / tracking stuff. When I try to set up my Apoc for fleets, I end up with 7 Tachs, mwd, medium rep 2 and fail to squeeze in everything because of CPU issues and have to fit an RCU2 to get comparable range and damage output to a mega or tempest. The geddon needs an mwd nowadays because of the megapulse range nerf and was clearly not balanced for it, it needs cpu love badly or we need to see a decrease in CPU use on beams. They're meant to be Grid hogs, not CPU hogs. (Yes, I do have eng / electronics / awu 5 and a -3% turret CPU implant) Agree, even with a character completely gal specced and no amarr character i can see how out of balance it is, megatrhon needs a pg decrease and the large beams and pulses need both a cpu decrease and a pg decrease to allow them to fit something remotely comparable
Jenny Spitfire Caldari	Posted - 2006.10.11 14:02:00 - [25] Nice one. Any chance of you having a look at faction ships especially cruisers? --------- Cruelty is God's way of showing kindness and God is kind. Vagabond pilots want http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=405915
Waut 0utbreak	Posted - 2006.10.11 14:03:00 - [26] Edited by: Waut on 11/10/2006 14:03:32 [Quote] Agility of battlecruisers and command ships boosted by 20% Nighthawk's explosion velocity changed to launcher rate of fire bonus This I like Outbreak! F* Yeah! Coming again to save the motherf*ing day yeah! In Soviet EVE, roids pop YOU
Rodj Blake Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2006.10.11 14:03:00 - [27] I endorse these changes. Dulce et decorum est, pro imperator mori
inSpirAcy The Solopwnmobiles	Posted - 2006.10.11 14:03:00 - [28] 20%? My Prophecy's going to rule.
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2006.10.11 14:04:00 - [29] gasp so my Ferox no longer handles like a solid block of lead, but like a rather bulky brick now ? __ Always question everything. Including yourself.
Weirda Minmatar Queens of the Stone Age Chimaera Pact	Posted - 2006.10.11 14:04:00 - [30] Great news Tux! as some other have stated, would be nice to see Stealth Bomber get a slight boost. Weirda have one (of many) thread in sig... check it out! __ Weirda Join QOTSA Now Stealth Bomber Tweaks



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.