EVE Search - One mod that annoys the hell out of you

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

One mod that annoys the hell out of you

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Radioactive Babe	Posted - 2006.12.13 12:45:00 - [1] Edited by: Radioactive Babe on 13/12/2006 13:38:47 If, given the chance, you were allowed to remove (not just nerf, but completely remove from the game) one type of mod .... which one would you go for? Personally, I'd go for a cloaks, between people afking cloaked in your home system to people camping complexes cloaked it's just annoying .. as well as that, someone is going to get a brown trouser moment trying to find out if that enemy fleet is on the other side of the gate or not (which imo is good)... it would bring that little bit of fear, not knowing whats sitting inside that POS, whats coming up the pipe ... We all know it wont ever happen, things get nerfed but never (or very rarely) get removed from the game.... just something to get the brain cells working while waiting alas, poor risk vs reward, I knew you well

Devil Hanzo Forum Moderator Interstellar Services Department	Posted - 2006.12.13 12:47:00 - [2] Originally by: Radioactive Babe If, given the chance, you were allowed to remove (not just nerf, but completely remove from the game) one type of mod .... which one would you go for? Forum Mods. Oh wait... forum rules \| [email protected] \| King of the Pink Sig

Queen Hades	Posted - 2006.12.13 12:47:00 - [3] Originally by: Radioactive Babe If, given the chance, you were allowed to remove (not just nerf, but completely remove from the game) one type of mod .... which one would you go for? Personally, I'd go for a cloaks, between people afking cloaked in your home system to people camping complexes cloaked it's just annoying .. as well as that, someone is going to get a brown trouser moment trying to find out if that enemy fleet is on the other side of the gate or not (which imo is good)... it would bring that little bit of fear, not knowing whats sitting inside that POS, whats coming up the pipe ... We all know it wont ever happen, things get nerfed but never (or very rarely) get removed from the game.... just something to get the brain cells working while waiting Before the long overdue wcs - nerf I'd have said "remove wcs", but now they are really fine. Everything else is ok and fills a role.
Darius Shakor Minmatar Freelance Unincorporated Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2006.12.13 12:51:00 - [4] I thought you were talking about the forum mods there for a second. I was about to say they would remove you first and IBTL. Anyway I would not remove anything. Just balance some overpowered stuff a little better. Such as Nosferatus having no drawback whatsoever making ships with non-turrret based weapons solo gankers like the Curse. I would either remove the drone bay entirely since it is the only recon ship with any drone bay at all, and the whole Arbi line is the only EWAR ship with drone bays, and give them an extra slot or two for weapons instead. Or give Nos a combat effectiveness drop such as a larger sig radius when in use like the MWD gives or whatever else that does not take too much away from the benefit of using Nos but gives you a disadvantage none the less. Speed of the ship for instance. Note, I have not through that one through in details so I am not writing gospel here, just chucking ideas out. ------ Shakor Clan Information Portal http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=3
Crumplecorn Gallente Aerial Boundaries Inc. Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.12.13 12:54:00 - [5] Edited by: Crumplecorn on 13/12/2006 12:57:01 Civilian Light Electron Blaster Overpowered, unbalances the game. Seriously though, can I say all ECM? If not, whatever the most powerful ECM module is, ECM is teh suck. ---------- IBTL \o/ EVE is upside down! WTZ+Slower Warp=Win
Synapse Archae Amarr Solarflare Heavy Industries	Posted - 2006.12.13 12:55:00 - [6] Originally by: Devil Hanzo Originally by: Radioactive Babe If, given the chance, you were allowed to remove (not just nerf, but completely remove from the game) one type of mod .... which one would you go for? Forum Mods. Oh wait... BANNED - Youre not allowed to discuss forum moderation on these forums. haha, always wanted to say that. - - - These elite slaves are exceptionally well suited for physical labor.
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2006.12.13 12:56:00 - [7] Cap Boosters Charges... go the way of the DoDo please. _ My skills \| Mod/Rig stacknerfing explained
Jeanpierre Duvall Caldari Spectral Armada Eternal Empire	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:01:00 - [8] Nosferatu. And maybe barges. I hate barges. (But I do fly one from time to time)
Nero Scuro Caldari Murder of Crows E N I G M A	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:01:00 - [9] Nosferatu. They suck. I am so, so sorry... ___ The world isn't going to end; we're not that lucky...
Grez Minmatar The Raven Warriors	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:02:00 - [10] Edited by: Grez on 13/12/2006 13:01:56 Originally by: Akita T Cap Boosters Charges... go the way of the DoDo please. LEAVE. NOW! LEAVE MY BLASTERTHRON BE! Imo, NOS needs to go, or be nerified :P --- Cache Clearer Still waiting for a Wrangler-edit!
Apolitos	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:02:00 - [11] i would remove warp scrams, cause they have no penalty when you fit 2 3 4 5 of them, if they were like hardeners and second had a 13% reduction could be fine, so you would need 3 warp scrams to pass a +2 WCS. Also NOS, cause other than you lose a hislot no other drawback and that "Wasted" hi-slot can be the "win" button in some cases. also i would remove the drinks and smokes from drone bay, down there they drink too much and smoke instead or listening our commands
daedauls	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:06:00 - [12] Originally by: Devil Hanzo Forum Mods. Oh wait... i honestly thought that's what he meant.
insidion	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:07:00 - [13] I like some of the recent changes to the point that I'm not sure if I would remove anything necessarily. I think that nos could be happily removed from the game, and you would finally see people would start using the proper alternatives of the energy dampeners. The other thing that kinda bugs me in this game are webbers actually. I know people who use these items as win buttons will counter with 'well if you don't like it, stay out of range' but still, imho these two types of items need an overhaul.
Slevin Kalebra	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:11:00 - [14] Prior to Kali I would have said ECM(jammers) but now they're nerfed. ECCM still doesn't seem to make much difference though. Tempted to say nos too, but really I think that just needs re-balancing (similar to the way that missiles are less effective against smaller / faster ships). How about lasers? All of 'em... let's give Amarr players something to really complain about
Joshua Foiritain Gallente Coreli Corporation Corelum Syndicate	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:13:00 - [15] Nosf. Though rather then removing id place limits as to how many can be fit onto ships. ----- [Coreli Corporation Mainframe]
Crumplecorn Gallente Aerial Boundaries Inc. Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:18:00 - [16] Originally by: Joshua Foiritain Nosf. Though rather then removing id place limits as to how many can be fit onto ships. There's already a limit. It's the number of hi slots you have. ---------- IBTL \o/ EVE is upside down! WTZ+Slower Warp=Win
TheZiggy Caldari Star Enterprises	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:19:00 - [17] Originally by: Joshua Foiritain Nosf. Though rather then removing id place limits as to how many can be fit onto ships. Some kind of stacking penalty might work.
jeNK Caldari STK Scientific Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:20:00 - [18] sensor damps. They are the new ECM and all of teh homo.
Jaketh Ivanes Amarr 1st Praetorian Guard	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:22:00 - [19] Edited by: Jaketh Ivanes on 13/12/2006 13:22:22 Nos has to go. The one and only mod that i'm agenst. Perhaps some tweaking to armor reppers afterwards to prevent infini tanks? EDIT: Heck, with nos's gone, laser will be a bit more usefull again.
Terraform Gallente	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:23:00 - [20] Originally by: Crumplecorn Originally by: Joshua Foiritain Nosf. Though rather then removing id place limits as to how many can be fit onto ships. There's already a limit. It's the number of hi slots you have. Oh yea, that's really restricting... i'm still waiting for a thread with someone whining why frigs don't have 8 high-slots like the battleships. I'd remove nos too, i think the whole concept of "stealing" energy is lame and they are too easy to fit with no penalties. I hereby remove my sig, sigs are evil, sigs are the devil and i suck at drawing...
Calisto Lockhart Minmatar Stormriders Fimbulwinter	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:29:00 - [21] energized adaptive nano membrane II yeah there handy, but i fly amarr :( Stormriders
Crumplecorn Gallente Aerial Boundaries Inc. Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:30:00 - [22] Originally by: Terraform Originally by: Crumplecorn Originally by: Joshua Foiritain Nosf. Though rather then removing id place limits as to how many can be fit onto ships. There's already a limit. It's the number of hi slots you have. Oh yea, that's really restricting... i'm still waiting for a thread with someone whining why frigs don't have 8 high-slots like the battleships. I'd remove nos too, i think the whole concept of "stealing" energy is lame and they are too easy to fit with no penalties. Actually, why don't frigates have 8 high slots? Rabble Rabble! ---------- IBTL \o/ EVE is upside down! WTZ+Slower Warp=Win
Tachy	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:32:00 - [23] Jaques, wystler and Nos if I had two coices. Can't decide, oh well, I think I can easily live without Nos, and the other two do not have much of an impact anyway. Maybe those annoying micro-smartbombs ... --==*-- The cause for this is not yet known, but we do have a possible fix in testing. by Sharkbait \| 2006.09.20
Jeanpierre Duvall Caldari Spectral Armada Eternal Empire	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:34:00 - [24] The reason I find that Nos can go is because there is a Cap warfare weapon out there already Energy Neuts. But the cap cost of the neuts could drop a bit and they would be better then nos. No more running 6 nos to support you tank while your drones do the job. I don't really see the point of nos in the game when there is neuts. I'm not ranting just trying to make a point.
Radioactive Babe	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:38:00 - [25] waaaa my thread, my beautiful thread, hijacked by nos haters but yes, they are overpowered ... hehe ... should change that title to "ship mods", for the sad sad few alas, poor risk vs reward, I knew you well
Jaketh Ivanes Amarr 1st Praetorian Guard	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:42:00 - [26] Originally by: Radioactive Babe waaaa my thread, my beautiful thread, hijacked by nos haters but yes, they are overpowered ... hehe ... should change that title to "ship mods", for the sad sad few Whats a ship mod? Thought a mod fitted on a ship, was a ship mod? Nos fits on ships
d026 Herrscher der Zeit Jagdgeschwader The Pentagram	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:42:00 - [27] i would remove nos.
Darwinia Minmatar	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:42:00 - [28] Heavy Nos ... it's just too much of a win-win module now. Medium and light are fine though. ------------------------ I don't believe in sigs.
Crumplecorn Gallente Aerial Boundaries Inc. Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:44:00 - [29] Remove Nos and ECM, not so much because they are overpowered in game, everyone already knows that, but because until they are removed, nothing else will be seriously suggested in threads like this. Think of the threads! ---------- IBTL \o/ EVE is upside down! WTZ+Slower Warp=Win
James Duar Merch Industrial	Posted - 2006.12.13 13:49:00 - [30] This thread was going to end oh-so-well. Let me summarize what will be said: remove everything which means that my raw DPS uber-ship can't pwn everyone.

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.