EVE Search - Sticky:Data Site Improvements

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Missions & Complexes

Sticky:Data Site Improvements

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 24 post(s)
Damjan Fox Fox Industries and Exploration 182	Posted - 2015.11.26 13:29:32 - [211] - Quote CCP RedDawn wrote: Introduced the higher tiered (higher value) Cosmos site building materials to all class wormhole Data sites. (C1 to C6) Is this a typo and you meant "C1 to C3" or are you adding these "higher tiered (higher value) Cosmos site building materials" to sleeper data sites aswell?
Yadaryon Vondawn Alius Itineris Virtus 72	Posted - 2015.11.26 14:10:21 - [212] - Quote CCP RedDawn wrote: Just a little heads up that the changes listed on my first post will be coming out with Operation Frostline on December the 8th. Will these changes be on Singularity beforehand? Is it also possible to get a list of all the items added to the droptable?

CCP RedDawn C C P C C P Alliance 742	Posted - 2015.11.26 15:11:57 - [213] - Quote Jeremiah Saken wrote: CCP RedDawn wrote: Just a little heads up that the changes listed on my first post will be coming out with Operation Frostline on December the 8th. Cool. Any chances to decrese the volume of Shattered Villard Wheels, they are 1m3 currently. Cargohold get stuffed by them quickly. Yeah I'll get that lowered as well for the December release. Team Space Glitter


CCP RedDawn C C P C C P Alliance 742	Posted - 2015.11.26 15:13:01 - [214] - Quote Damjan Fox wrote: CCP RedDawn wrote: Introduced the higher tiered (higher value) Cosmos site building materials to all class wormhole Data sites. (C1 to C6) Is this a typo and you meant "C1 to C3" or are you adding these "higher tiered (higher value) Cosmos site building materials" to sleeper data sites aswell? Not a typo. Cosmos loot will also be included in the C4 to C6 Sleeper data sites. Team Space Glitter


CCP RedDawn C C P C C P Alliance 742	Posted - 2015.11.26 15:19:50 - [215] - Quote Yadaryon Vondawn wrote: CCP RedDawn wrote: Just a little heads up that the changes listed on my first post will be coming out with Operation Frostline on December the 8th. Will these changes be on Singularity beforehand? Is it also possible to get a list of all the items added to the droptable? Yes these changes are on Singularity now. Team Space Glitter

MuraSaki Siki Minmatar Ship Construction Services 65	Posted - 2015.11.26 15:20:19 - [216] - Quote hope that there will be a dev blog coming out for the details
Damjan Fox Fox Industries and Exploration 182	Posted - 2015.11.26 16:06:29 - [217] - Quote @CCP RedDawn thanks for your reply and your effort, of course. I'm eager to see, how those changes will affect the value of data sites. Although, i think this still won't put them on par with relics. But it's definately a step in the right direction. Keep up the good work.
Yadaryon Vondawn Alius Itineris Virtus 72	Posted - 2015.11.26 20:14:02 - [218] - Quote CCP RedDawn wrote: Jeremiah Saken wrote: CCP RedDawn wrote: Just a little heads up that the changes listed on my first post will be coming out with Operation Frostline on December the 8th. Cool. Any chances to decrese the volume of Shattered Villard Wheels, they are 1m3 currently. Cargohold get stuffed by them quickly. Yeah I'll get that lowered as well for the December release. While you are at it; Could you also please lower the volume of Ancient/Faction Materials and Compounds from 1m3 to 0.1m3? A "Talocan Reflective Sheets" or "Takmahl Centrifugal Primer" is currently 1m3 while a "Positron Cord" is 0.1m3. It is the exact same item after all, just a different name. I was hunting data sites on SiSi and noticed that the volume sizes of these data items dont match up currently.
Loreen Parker State War Academy Caldari State 0	Posted - 2015.11.28 11:11:41 - [219] - Quote * All Ghost sites are now Cosmic Signatures rather than Anomalies. So they need to be scanned down? Why?! It takes ages to find one in null. Why make them even harder to find? Or is this just for the besieged sites sites in low sec?
Tipa Riot Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 1728	Posted - 2015.11.30 15:28:09 - [220] - Quote Will there be devblog about the changes, I lost track a bit ... To the experts who have followed, what is the effective change for relic and data sites value-wise? From my relic expedition yesterday I recognize that data sites are still ignored by explorers and polluting systems ... I'm my own NPC alt.

Jeremiah Saken The Fall of Leviathan 496	Posted - 2015.12.01 08:25:55 - [221] - Quote Tipa Riot wrote: To the experts who have followed, what is the effective change for relic and data sites value-wise? From my relic expedition yesterday I recognize that data sites are still ignored by explorers and polluting systems ... It depends from where CCP want cosmos items. Most of them have fitting options as the only advantage (compare 1600mm T2 with cosmos). Most ships with decent skills don't have so tight CPU and PG. I presume there are thousands of BPCs from caches waiting to be used. From my perspective cosmos items are useless, if I need to choose I would use deadspace over them (both fitting and performance). Market will decide. Oversaturation at start, 3-5 months to stabilize, tears in the middle. Generally I'm positive, I'm doing them anyway. "(...) I am tormented with an everlasting itch for things remote. I love to sail forbidden seas (...)"
Damaris Velazquez Melusine Temple 2	Posted - 2015.12.01 08:47:59 - [222] - Quote CCP RedDawn wrote: [quote=Yadaryon Vondawn][quote=CCP RedDawn] [...] CCP RedDawn, could you be so kind and put ghost sites NPCs in overview settings, because they are neither in entity nor in NPC types. It's terrible because due to mini game board it's impossible to see when they appear.
Fermin Mascagranzas Uranus Intruders Test Alliance Please Ignore 21	Posted - 2015.12.04 09:25:13 - [223] - Quote Loreen Parker wrote: * All Ghost sites are now Cosmic Signatures rather than Anomalies. So they need to be scanned down? Why?! It takes ages to find one in null. Why make them even harder to find? Or is this just for the besieged sites sites in low sec? I tend to think that it actually will increase the chances of finding a ghost site. Now a lot of them are popped up by curious, clueless or just tarded people that warps in the site "for the lulz". Now only dedicated explorers will be able to see them.
Chance Ravinne WiNGSPAN Delivery Services The WINGSPAN Logo Alliance 627	Posted - 2015.12.05 05:24:56 - [224] - Quote Fermin Mascagranzas wrote: Loreen Parker wrote: * All Ghost sites are now Cosmic Signatures rather than Anomalies. So they need to be scanned down? Why?! It takes ages to find one in null. Why make them even harder to find? Or is this just for the besieged sites sites in low sec? I tend to think that it actually will increase the chances of finding a ghost site. Now a lot of them are popped up by curious, clueless or just tarded people that warps in the site "for the lulz". Now only dedicated explorers will be able to see them. Indeed. Plus some explorers were never looking for them to begin with! You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT
Holly Downs Rainy Day Industries 0	Posted - 2015.12.05 10:32:34 - [225] - Quote Are the covert site changes (requirement to use probes to locate them via cosmic sigs) on Tranquility now? I did over 100 Null jumps with no covert sites... Will we get an update when the changes go live?
Loreen Parker State War Academy Caldari State 0	Posted - 2015.12.05 14:13:04 - [226] - Quote Chance Ravinne wrote: Fermin Mascagranzas wrote: Loreen Parker wrote: * All Ghost sites are now Cosmic Signatures rather than Anomalies. So they need to be scanned down? Why?! It takes ages to find one in null. Why make them even harder to find? Or is this just for the besieged sites sites in low sec? I tend to think that it actually will increase the chances of finding a ghost site. Now a lot of them are popped up by curious, clueless or just tarded people that warps in the site "for the lulz". Now only dedicated explorers will be able to see them. Indeed. Plus some explorers were never looking for them to begin with! Hey Chance, i like your videos! i am mostly doing relic /data sites in null. i never did any ghost sites until a few weeks ago. now i hunt them in highly specialized ship. so "ages" means in my case ~ 30-60 minutes. After the patch this is no longer possible. If they spread out like right now i expect to find one every other day while just doing relic sites again
Terminalia Wisperrant Signal Cartel EvE-Scout Enclave 1	Posted - 2015.12.05 15:17:22 - [227] - Quote The most pressing issue right now is cherrypicking. Even though in my exploration corp and in help channels there is a useful stigma against cherrypicking, there are still many people who do it. And many of them cherrypick not only due to some notion of increasing their own time efficiency, but mainly to stick it to the intelligent and correct explorers who tell them not to cherrypick. Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit.
Elnia Arthie Atztech Inc. Ixtab. 3	Posted - 2015.12.05 18:49:33 - [228] - Quote Holly Downs wrote: Are the covert site changes (requirement to use probes to locate them via cosmic sigs) on Tranquility now? I did over 100 Null jumps with no covert sites... Will we get an update when the changes go live? According to the patch notes this change will be deployed Dec. 8th.
Chance Ravinne WiNGSPAN Delivery Services The WINGSPAN Logo Alliance 628	Posted - 2015.12.06 03:32:08 - [229] - Quote Loreen Parker wrote: Chance Ravinne wrote: Fermin Mascagranzas wrote: Loreen Parker wrote: * All Ghost sites are now Cosmic Signatures rather than Anomalies. So they need to be scanned down? Why?! It takes ages to find one in null. Why make them even harder to find? Or is this just for the besieged sites sites in low sec? I tend to think that it actually will increase the chances of finding a ghost site. Now a lot of them are popped up by curious, clueless or just tarded people that warps in the site "for the lulz". Now only dedicated explorers will be able to see them. Indeed. Plus some explorers were never looking for them to begin with! Hey Chance, i like your videos! i am mostly doing relic /data sites in null. i never did any ghost sites until a few weeks ago. now i hunt them in highly specialized ship. so "ages" means in my case ~ 30-60 minutes. After the patch this is no longer possible. If they spread out like right now i expect to find one every other day while just doing relic sites again edit: oh and what im doing may well look like some noob just warped to the site for lols. but that noob may have just warped away 1/2 bil in loot ritcher. Hey thanks! Specialized Ghost site hunting is definitely a niche, but due to the way they spawn/despawn it's hilariously easy for people who don't know what they are both to get killed and to waste them for players like you, who are prepared for the challenge. Being so easily warpable doesn't really make much sense either, what with the "covert" part of it all haha You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT
Tipa Riot Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 1786	Posted - 2015.12.06 08:25:24 - [230] - Quote Terminalia Wisperrant wrote: The most pressing issue right now is cherrypicking. Even though in my exploration corp and in help channels there is a useful stigma against cherrypicking, there are still many people who do it. And many of them cherrypick not only due to some notion of increasing their own time efficiency, but mainly to stick it to the intelligent and correct explorers who tell them not to cherrypick. Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit. This, so much. But I guess some code has to be written or changed for that ... I'm my own NPC alt.

Omnathious Deninard Novis Initiis 3241	Posted - 2015.12.06 14:25:28 - [231] - Quote Terminalia Wisperrant wrote: The most pressing issue right now is cherrypicking. Even though in my exploration corp and in help channels there is a useful stigma against cherrypicking, there are still many people who do it. And many of them cherrypick not only due to some notion of increasing their own time efficiency, but mainly to stick it to the intelligent and correct explorers who tell them not to cherrypick. Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit. It is an indirect form of PVP, also if you have to hack all the containers it will only be a matter of time before there is more bitching about crap loot or nothing in a container which they had to spend time hacking. So they will either want fewer cans per site or better loot per can. Both of which will cause the value of the loot to drop even further. So no don't make all cans unscannable, keep them as is, if you want your loot to be worth anything. If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.
Tipa Riot Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 1786	Posted - 2015.12.06 19:12:14 - [232] - Quote Omnathious Deninard wrote: Terminalia Wisperrant wrote: The most pressing issue right now is cherrypicking. Even though in my exploration corp and in help channels there is a useful stigma against cherrypicking, there are still many people who do it. And many of them cherrypick not only due to some notion of increasing their own time efficiency, but mainly to stick it to the intelligent and correct explorers who tell them not to cherrypick. Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit. It is an indirect form of PVP, also if you have to hack all the containers it will only be a matter of time before there is more bitching about crap loot or nothing in a container which they had to spend time hacking. So they will either want fewer cans per site or better loot per can. Both of which will cause the value of the loot to drop even further. So no don't make all cans unscannable, keep them as is, if you want your loot to be worth anything. Actually making cans unscannable increases the value of the (good) loot. Because people who cherry pick now, will need more time and maybe get annoyed running the sites ... I'm my own NPC alt.
Damjan Fox Fox Industries and Exploration 198	Posted - 2015.12.06 20:35:04 - [233] - Quote We'll have to wait and see, if those changes to data sites really increase the value of them and persuade more explorers to actually run them. But i very much doubt that. As i see it, it doesn't help, to add items with low drop rates and little higher value. The items, that commonly drop in data sites, should have a general higher value. The value of Data Cores and Decryptors is determined by supply and demand, so there is not much one can do here. Increasing the amount of them, would only lower the price, so that would be pointless. But what about the "high-tech" stuff? CCP added them to the loot-table to increase the value of data sites, but never gave them a purpose, so they are actually worth nothing. Something obviously went wrong here. This would be the best opportunity to put data sites on par with relics. Give "high-tech" items a use in industry as required materials in blueprints. Just make sure, the demand for them is so high, that it will increase their value enough, to make explorers go out to run those data sites. (Or just remove them from the game already, as they are pointless now) Regards, Damjan Quote: Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit. +1 for this Proposal: >>> New Inventory / Item Hangar <<<
Estella Osoka Perkone Caldari State 914	Posted - 2015.12.07 16:09:04 - [234] - Quote Terminalia Wisperrant wrote: The most pressing issue right now is cherrypicking. Even though in my exploration corp and in help channels there is a useful stigma against cherrypicking, there are still many people who do it. And many of them cherrypick not only due to some notion of increasing their own time efficiency, but mainly to stick it to the intelligent and correct explorers who tell them not to cherrypick. Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit. No. When you are running relic/data sites in null, WH, and losec; you want to get in and out as fast as you can before someone comes in to ruin your day. If you have to hack every can, then the chances of you getting caught just went up significantly. Site should despawn after a set amount of time once someone warps into it.
Tipa Riot Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 1786	Posted - 2015.12.07 20:52:28 - [235] - Quote Estella Osoka wrote: Terminalia Wisperrant wrote: The most pressing issue right now is cherrypicking. Even though in my exploration corp and in help channels there is a useful stigma against cherrypicking, there are still many people who do it. And many of them cherrypick not only due to some notion of increasing their own time efficiency, but mainly to stick it to the intelligent and correct explorers who tell them not to cherrypick. Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit. No. When you are running relic/data sites in null, WH, and losec; you want to get in and out as fast as you can before someone comes in to ruin your day. If you have to hack every can, then the chances of you getting caught just went up significantly. Which is a welcome change, more dead explorers, more fun, better loot prices. BTW, unfinished sites despawn, but it takes about an hour iirc. I'm my own NPC alt.
Estella Osoka Perkone Caldari State 915	Posted - 2015.12.07 22:12:43 - [236] - Quote Tipa Riot wrote: Estella Osoka wrote: Terminalia Wisperrant wrote: The most pressing issue right now is cherrypicking. Even though in my exploration corp and in help channels there is a useful stigma against cherrypicking, there are still many people who do it. And many of them cherrypick not only due to some notion of increasing their own time efficiency, but mainly to stick it to the intelligent and correct explorers who tell them not to cherrypick. Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit. No. When you are running relic/data sites in null, WH, and losec; you want to get in and out as fast as you can before someone comes in to ruin your day. If you have to hack every can, then the chances of you getting caught just went up significantly. Which is a welcome change, more dead explorers, more fun, better loot prices. BTW, unfinished sites despawn, but it takes about an hour iirc. Nah, people already like to cloak up in those sites and wait for targets in null/WH/lowsec; you're just gimping them more by making them do have to hack every can. Make the depawn time shorter.
Jeremiah Saken The Fall of Leviathan 496	Posted - 2015.12.08 10:56:18 - [237] - Quote Terminalia Wisperrant wrote: Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit. It won't solve the problem, ppl will hack only ruins. Cans have names on them, we can tell which one may have best loot. I don't like cans scanning but problem is wider. Tipa Riot wrote: BTW, unfinished sites despawn, but it takes about an hour iirc. Good. Assuming one site despawn after 1 hour, there will be ~23 sites per day (23 possible loot tables from it). Now imagine site despawn right after you leave it. Rotation will incease. How many more sites there will be to scan and hack? 4-6 time more? Now inject 4-6 more loot from them to the market. As Omnathious Deninard wrote Quote: It is an indirect form of PVP I think primary thing should be to make data and relic analyzers different now. "(...) I am tormented with an everlasting itch for things remote. I love to sail forbidden seas (...)"
Tipa Riot Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 1787	Posted - 2015.12.08 21:37:06 - [238] - Quote I see, both points are valid, having more sites completed and people just leaving remains and down untouched ... not that easy to guess what will be the effect on loot value. I'm my own NPC alt.
Madeleine Lemmont Divide et Impera DE Aeterna Anima 28	Posted - 2015.12.09 15:49:25 - [239] - Quote CCP RedDawn wrote: ... * High Tech items are on my list to make useful ... * I'm making a plan to look into the use of the most commonly dropped loot ... * The Reverse Engineering supply and demand is something I will add to my personal backlog... I've went around as an explorer a while. Usually I take all items from boxes. Also the fully useless stuff (trade goods). But I cannot see, which items are plain trade goods and which ones could be used to build anything from. It would be great to see a BP-list, what items could be used for instead of only reprocessed minerals in industry tab. I have to visit faction data sites in wh again. Maybe there's anything happen to rise their value not only though spawns of much more less valuable items. Those items block my trading slots only. Data sites in wh needed a much higher quality not quantity only. Hardening containers in sites against cargo scanners would force explorers to open them all and triggers a site respawn elsewhere.There's no need for providing advantages to cherry pickers. Else those scanners should work accurate within a much closer range only.
Madeleine Lemmont Divide et Impera DE Aeterna Anima 28	Posted - 2015.12.09 16:36:53 - [240] - Quote CCP RedDawn wrote: ... Regarding the variance between hacking data sites vs relic sites, hacking game iterations is something i've been pushing for for a while. Right now they are too similar in my opinion and I would love to see some more separation. However that will have to be looked into at another time. In my opinion you may change the "look" first and the "feel" later. Different background pictures for analyzing for instance. Later: Hacking needs electronic traps, archeology needs physical/mechanical ones (tripwire, explosives with countdown to un-arm, when uncovered, trapdoors back to lower layer, etc.) The principles of the minigame, the game mechanics could stay the same. Moreover archeologists need hat and lash to wear via NES. Hacking needs virus-strength, archeology needs "intuition & sensitivity" Hacking is more like studies, archeology is more like surgery Archeology should be not the same, technology driven item collection like hacking. You need to remove debris and waste step by step carefully. Else you will have damaged or destroyed artifacts. Maybe multi-level-analyzing of smaller fields with relic analyzer could be an answer. (Tier numer = layer number, but all layer with field complexity of debris, with special traps at higher tiers) Else hacking needs much more CPU than power and archeology more energy/power instead. Modules should run once while starting the minigame comparable to cloaking devices. Keep running until autostop after touching the content. --- Tier-5/Tier-10-Stuff (hacking player anchored inactive structures with data analyzer) - multi-level-hacking - like a dungeon game - starting hacking will generate a suspect flag. - find a key to switch the layer and then find the gate for the key - same thing up to 5 times - successful hacking will provide access to the content within (i.e. an MTU) OR access to the anchoring menu (maybe a choice while hacking layers) - in order to take over ownership of structures you should need some more than hacking only - player might be able to harden their still hard to hack structures against hacking additionally (maybe using "hacking" minigame to harden it) - containers are easier as small structures - the new structures won't be hackable until they are abandoned



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.