Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 47 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
NightmareX
Coreli Corporation Mercenary Coalition
717
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 05:18:30 -
[151] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:How? You lose your ship in seconds, you can't warp, you cant undock in anything but a pod. The only thing left is podding, gankers won't care, they'll just use implant free clones for ganking and wake up in a med clone at the same station, because they're not daft and set the station that they're working out of up with a med clone. Yeah, you lose a ship worth a couple of million isks and 15 minutes of your time. Such a horrible punishment to lose when you takes into the consideration that you freely without ANY risks except for losing the worthless ship can just do this over and over and over again every 15 mins without any other consequences.
You think it's ok to do crimes this way over and over and not being punished harder over continuing doing the said crime?
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Which part of you can't avoid Concord did you fail to understand? It's mechanically impossible and if you do find a way it's a ban. I never said avoid Concord. I said to be able to get away somewhere AFTER Concord have killed you for doing a crime while being within the Concord timer. If you do commit a crime or suicide someone, then Concord will kill you. If you avoid that, then yes, it's a bannable offense. But that's not what i'm talking about. I'm talking about leaving a system under the Concord timer AFTER you have been killed by them.
I'm just saying it should be harder to roam in high sec the more crimes you do each day from downtime to downtime.
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:See all of the above, you're another one that has no idea how Concord and Crimewatch actually work. I'm sorry, but look at my replies over first before you claim i have no clues. I have been plahing EVE since early 2004, but i for sure knows how this works. All i want is a system that will makes it harder for players who have committed a crime to freely roam around in high sec without getting caught by Concord or whatever.
Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:
1: Asteroid Madness
2: Clash of the Empires
3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama
|
NightmareX
Coreli Corporation Mercenary Coalition
717
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 05:19:45 -
[152] - Quote
Imya Wormhole wrote:I love how he is using the goons WWB background while complaining about goons ganking him. If you are talking about me, then no, i use the Voltron / MBC background from the WWB.
The other one that is the new background is the Imperium one.
Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:
1: Asteroid Madness
2: Clash of the Empires
3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama
|
Circo Maximo
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 05:19:48 -
[153] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:NightmareX wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:If you want ganking to be harder or not as profitable, you pay attention to what you're doing and don't present them with easy or juicy targets.
It's that fecking simple. Still doesn't makes the idea of getting the Concord to be harder against the gankers the more they gank bad in any ways. There should be some kind of a trade off for doing that more and more. Why are you expecting NPC's to make it harder for gankers? You already have the tools to do it yourself. Gankers will adapt to any changes that happen with regards to Concord response, just as they have in the past. People will still continue to do stupid stuff like put eleventy billion isk in an untanked freighter and AP it through a chokepoint, they will explode and this thread will start all over again. For example, some of the changes people suggest and the gankers obvious response Faster response times : Bring more DPS Longer timers: They switch between gank characters. Scaling response times on ganking history : CCP's database admin ganks you for making his life hell. It's a constant cycle of one more nerf will fix ganking, and it never does because ganking isn't the problem, stupidity is. CCP can't patch stupid. Again. Do you think it's fine that you get the exact same treatment from the police / Concord everytime you do a crime over and over again over being punished harder and harder the more crimes you do (which is logical by human nature by the way)? And why do you think it's fair that i get the same treatment from Concord for suiciding on a Rifter as you get for suiciding a massive freighter? If i steal a small pack og bubblegum and if i steal a car, do you think i will get punished the same for stealing the pack of bubblegum as i get for stealing the car?
All capsuleers matter. Your freighter doesn't deserve more protection from CONCORD than that rifter. If what you have is so valuable, protect it better. One person shouldn't be invincible anywhere in the game. You already have CONCORD killing everyone that attacks people and attacking criminals on sight.
Put more time in playing smarter instead of sitting there begging for your hand to be held more. Don't play an MMO if you don't want player interaction.
|
NightmareX
Coreli Corporation Mercenary Coalition
717
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 05:23:29 -
[154] - Quote
Circo Maximo wrote:All capsuleers matter. Your freighter doesn't deserve more protection from CONCORD than that rifter. If what you have is so valuable, protect it better. One person shouldn't be invincible anywhere in the game. You already have CONCORD killing everyone that attacks people and attacking criminals on sight.
Put more time in playing smarter instead of sitting there begging for your hand to be held more. Don't play an MMO if you don't want player interaction.
But this is not about what ship you fly. It's about the crimes you do. The more crimes you do, the more penalties or consequences you should face. It's logic by human nature to threat criminals like that. So the same should be in EVE to.
Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:
1: Asteroid Madness
2: Clash of the Empires
3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama
|
NightmareX
Coreli Corporation Mercenary Coalition
717
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 05:27:16 -
[155] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Imya Wormhole wrote:I love how he is using the goons WWB background while complaining about goons ganking him. I love how both the OP and NightmareX appear to be wholly ignorant of the mechanic that they're trying to "fix". Says the guy who think doing crimes over and over again should not gain you more penalities or consequences.
Don't pretend to be a smart guy if you can't explain why there shouldn't be a system like that in EVE.
Oh i forgot. That's because you then can't do the risk free and no consequences ganking all day long as easily as you can do it today.
Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:
1: Asteroid Madness
2: Clash of the Empires
3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
27804
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 05:38:18 -
[156] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Yeah, you lose a ship worth a couple of million isks and 15 minutes of your time. Such a horrible punishment to lose when you takes into the consideration that you freely without ANY risks except for losing the worthless ship can just do this over and over and over again every 15 mins without any other consequences.
You think it's ok to do crimes this way over and over and not being punished harder over continuing doing the said crime? Yes, it's a game.
Quote: I never said avoid Concord. I said to be able to get away somewhere AFTER Concord have killed you for doing a crime while being within the Concord timer. If you do commit a crime or suicide someone, then Concord will kill you. If you avoid that, then yes, it's a bannable offense. But that's not what i'm talking about. I'm talking about leaving a system under the Concord timer AFTER you have been killed by them.
If you're under the timer to which Concord respond then your changes won't fix the things that you claim it'll will fix.
The reason being that it's mechanically impossible to leave the system in anything other than a pod or via a jump clone while under a criminal flag/timer, and Concord don't pod. Even if they did, it would make little difference to gankers because they tend to work in select systems, which they'll never need to leave while under the timer to which Concord responds; and as mentioned med clones are a thing.
Quote:I'm just saying it should be harder to roam in high sec the more crimes you do each day from downtime to downtime. I'm saying that your suggestion is aimed at making it easier and easier for the stupid, the greedy and the lazy to ply the space lanes without losing their stuff.
Why should the people who put effort into their gameplay be penalised for it, while at the same rewarding those who don't put any effort or though in at all?
Quote:See all of the above, you're another one that has no idea how Concord and Crimewatch actually work. I'm sorry, but look at my replies over first before you claim i have no clues. I have been plahing EVE since early 2004, but i for sure knows how this works. All i want is a system that will makes it harder for players who have committed a crime to freely roam around in high sec without getting caught by Concord or whatever.[/quote]I don't care how long you've been playing, either your knowledge is lacking or you have difficulty demonstrating it on the forums.
Oh and you're wrong about something else, I'm no ganker, I'm the prey that gets away because I'm not fly stupid.
In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.
New Player FAQ
Feyd's Survival Pack
|
NightmareX
Coreli Corporation Mercenary Coalition
717
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 05:40:46 -
[157] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Yes, it's a game. So just because it's a game, the game can't be improved or balanced to let criminals be threated as actual criminals?
Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:
1: Asteroid Madness
2: Clash of the Empires
3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
27804
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 05:44:34 -
[158] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Yes, it's a game. So just because it's a game, the game can't be improved or balanced to let criminals be threated as actual criminals? I'm not sure, but i think you shouldn't talk so loudly on who knows what when you can't even explain the things i'm talking about, JUST BECAUSE IT'S A FREAKING GAME. Nobody is saying that the game shouldn't be improved, we're saying that your suggestion isn't an improvement in our opinion.
In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.
New Player FAQ
Feyd's Survival Pack
|
NightmareX
Coreli Corporation Mercenary Coalition
717
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 05:48:04 -
[159] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Nobody is saying that the game shouldn't be improved, we're saying that your suggestion isn't an improvement in our opinion. And why isn't it an improvement to actually threat criminals as actual criminals?
EDIT: Going to bed now, so i will answer or give out new posts if needed later today.
Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:
1: Asteroid Madness
2: Clash of the Empires
3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
27804
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 05:56:48 -
[160] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Nobody is saying that the game shouldn't be improved, we're saying that your suggestion isn't an improvement in our opinion. And why isn't it an improvement to actually threat criminals as actual criminals? This is what history tells us about nerfs to ganking. Gankers get nerfed Gankers adapt. People still explode and whine on the forums about it. Someone else comes up with a great idea to make ganking more difficult. Ad infinitum. The grand circle of one more nerf.
Now your turn to answer a question.
I wrote:Why should the people who put effort into their gameplay be penalised for it, while at the same rewarding those who don't put any effort or thought in at all?
How is that anywhere near balanced?
In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.
New Player FAQ
Feyd's Survival Pack
|
|
Naye Nathaniel
COBRA INC
32
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 07:03:24 -
[161] - Quote
Massive +1 for the Thread Owner! Finally some people starts to speak it laud; Todays mechanic is too old for todays players who abuse the rules;
Creating a **** toons of alphas HAVE impact at servers quality - logging off, and on tousands of time per day just to avoide consequances is breaking the rules as there are NO punishment for this kind of actions;
So double +1 |
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5993
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 07:03:30 -
[162] - Quote
NightmareX wrote: Who said anything about how much money i'm traveling with?
But that is the point. Ganking an empty freighter happens, but rarely, aside from events like Burn Jita.
NightmareX wrote:For all you know i can travel with ALOT of money.
Well, in the U.S. you can travel with any amount of money. Of course, if the police stop you they could take it via civil asset forfeiture. So, you arenGÇÖt even safe from them. Maybe CONCORD should start ganking the odd overstuffed freighter and call it civil asset forfeiture.
BTW, with civil asset forfeiture law enforcement must merely suspect wrong doing, not actually charge you with a crime.
NightmareX wrote:Not only that, but scouting for gankers in Destroyers is very hard. Because one second a gate can be clear and tells the Freighter to jump in. But because the freighter is so slow at entering warp, you can basicly sit 2 jumps out with some Destroyers and just head towards the freighter and gank it before it had entered warp. Not only that. Should every Freighter polits just stop doing what they are doing, just because they see a potential bumping Machariel at gates to?
Use local for the love of God. Set known ganking organizations red. Use webs. Tank your freighter. DonGÇÖt put too much value in it. There are plenty of idiots out there you just have to be smarter than them. Let the gankers eat them while you sail on through.
NightmareX wrote:Once a freighter is getting bumped by some MacharielGǪ.
Yes, at this point you have basically screwed up several times.
1. Too much stuff in your cargo hold. 2. No scout. 3. No webs. 4. You probably anti-tanked your freighter. 5. You are almost surely going to die.
You should have not done everything wrong in 1-4.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5993
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 07:08:19 -
[163] - Quote
NightmareX wrote: You still haven't explained why Concord shouldn't take into consideration on how much you have ganked each day?
They are the police and are supposed to have control over the crimes you do.
Yeah, Concord should punish you harder and harder within the Concord timer ONCE they take you for doing a new crime.
Yeah, Concord doesn't looks after that now, but that doesn't mean they can't do it in the future. Because it's normal that when you commit a crime, it should be harder and harder for you to avoid Concord within the Concord timer the more crimes you do.
If you do not agree with this, then please give reasonable reasons why this wouldn't work?
So you have two guys, both -10. One guy got that way by ganking. The other by killing people in LS.
You want to treat them the same, but based on your arguments you shouldnGÇÖt. One guy has ganked and ganked and ganked. The other engaged people in LS, a place where CONCORD does not patrol.
Jonah is pointing out your mechanics suggestion is flawed, dumb, stupid, and will not discriminate if based on sec status.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5993
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 07:14:10 -
[164] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:NightmareX wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Nobody is saying that the game shouldn't be improved, we're saying that your suggestion isn't an improvement in our opinion. And why isn't it an improvement to actually threat criminals as actual criminals? This is what history tells us about nerfs to ganking. Gankers get nerfed Gankers adapt. People still explode and whine on the forums about it. Someone else comes up with a great idea to make ganking more difficult. Ad infinitum. The grand circle of one more nerf. Now your turn to answer a question. I wrote:Why should the people who put effort into their gameplay be penalised for it, while at the same rewarding those who don't put any effort or thought in at all?
How is that anywhere near balanced?
Adding to this now you have groups like Miniluv and CODE. who are practically profession ganking organizations. They can gank even in 1.0 systems if the idiot has put enough value into his freighter.
We got here for a reason...that reason are the previous changes to ganking, CONCORD, etc.
Now you want to nerf it again. Are you sure. It hasn't worked out for you so far.
And yes, you can nerf it until it is dead, but killing content is not going to help the game. Go look at the trends in Eve Offline.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5993
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 07:17:13 -
[165] - Quote
Jakara Dakara wrote:Erich Einstein wrote:Jakara Dakara wrote: OK 1) You should try searching the forum, this post has been made, ad nauseam, again and again and again. 2) Concord is designed to react to a crime not prevent, CCP has not mentioned wanting to change this. 3) Concord gets regularly made a fool out of in the lore, why can't we have fun with the police too? 4) Having alpha safety locks has been mentioned in other threads as well, they don't want to take emergent game play away from them 5) Everything you mentioned would still severely damage the ability for dudes to gank, even worse than it has been already. 6) You've mentioned you steal the loot from a gank and profit off of it (making it less worthwhile for the gankers I might add), why would you want to remove that emergent gameplay/profit source from yourself?
because its bad gameplay for a highsec system and I can make isk in any security status. I dont rely on ganks for income. so what about points 1 - 5?
Forget it. They guy can't think like that, IMO. He just simply can't. The concepts of emergence and spontaneous order are literally outside his area of knowledge. He isn't even aware of why we have gotten "here" where we have professional ganking groups like CODE. and Miniluv. He should be blaming CCP and their changes to the game that got us here. But he won't because as I said things like emergence are things he just not comprehend. At all.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
3776
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 07:33:23 -
[166] - Quote
Erich Einstein wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:If you want to make the game better you'd be asking for buffs to ganking. Increases rewards for smart players. Penalises the dumb and lazy. And i mean for haulers and miners when i say that.
But no. Just another carebear that doesn't know his arse from his elbow. Wants the game to change so he doesn't have to think. You must be on a troll fest or something. That or you are just really dumb...
Not dumb enough to be ganked in a freighter.
EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"
Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
|
Erich Einstein
Swoop Salvage
29
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 08:09:50 -
[167] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:Erich Einstein wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:If you want to make the game better you'd be asking for buffs to ganking. Increases rewards for smart players. Penalises the dumb and lazy. And i mean for haulers and miners when i say that.
But no. Just another carebear that doesn't know his arse from his elbow. Wants the game to change so he doesn't have to think. You must be on a troll fest or something. That or you are just really dumb... Not dumb enough to be ganked in a freighter.
Yeah, just a 3+ bil hull filled with blueprints : https://zkillboard.com/kill/18320221/ |
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5993
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 08:17:35 -
[168] - Quote
Erich Einstein wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:Erich Einstein wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:If you want to make the game better you'd be asking for buffs to ganking. Increases rewards for smart players. Penalises the dumb and lazy. And i mean for haulers and miners when i say that.
But no. Just another carebear that doesn't know his arse from his elbow. Wants the game to change so he doesn't have to think. You must be on a troll fest or something. That or you are just really dumb... Not dumb enough to be ganked in a freighter. Yeah, just a 3+ bil hull filled with blueprints : https://zkillboard.com/kill/18320221/
That wasn't a gank.
And wow were you looking hard for that one. Is that what you've been doing since your last post. Trolling through Daichi's loss mails trying to find something....anything.
Truly pathetic.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Erich Einstein
Swoop Salvage
29
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 08:35:15 -
[169] - Quote
Teckos Pech wrote:Erich Einstein wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:Erich Einstein wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:If you want to make the game better you'd be asking for buffs to ganking. Increases rewards for smart players. Penalises the dumb and lazy. And i mean for haulers and miners when i say that.
But no. Just another carebear that doesn't know his arse from his elbow. Wants the game to change so he doesn't have to think. You must be on a troll fest or something. That or you are just really dumb... Not dumb enough to be ganked in a freighter. Yeah, just a 3+ bil hull filled with blueprints : https://zkillboard.com/kill/18320221/ That wasn't a gank. And wow were you looking hard for that one. Is that what you've been doing since your last post. Trolling through Daichi's loss mails trying to find something....anything. Truly pathetic.
Your likes received and the amount of repetitive posts on this thread are what is pathetic. |
Van Doe
29
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 09:16:28 -
[170] - Quote
Erich Einstein wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:Erich Einstein wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:If you want to make the game better you'd be asking for buffs to ganking. Increases rewards for smart players. Penalises the dumb and lazy. And i mean for haulers and miners when i say that.
But no. Just another carebear that doesn't know his arse from his elbow. Wants the game to change so he doesn't have to think. You must be on a troll fest or something. That or you are just really dumb... Not dumb enough to be ganked in a freighter. Yeah, just a 3+ bil hull filled with blueprints : https://zkillboard.com/kill/18320221/ So you want concord to be buffed so they can police in null?
Btw that's a total legit loss. Nothing to do with the stupidly getting ganked in highsec
I'm not trolling, I create content for everyone to enjoy.
afk cloaky in a system near you while posting in this forum.
|
|
Naye Nathaniel
COBRA INC
32
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 10:00:03 -
[171] - Quote
Van Doe wrote:Erich Einstein wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:Erich Einstein wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:If you want to make the game better you'd be asking for buffs to ganking. Increases rewards for smart players. Penalises the dumb and lazy. And i mean for haulers and miners when i say that.
But no. Just another carebear that doesn't know his arse from his elbow. Wants the game to change so he doesn't have to think. You must be on a troll fest or something. That or you are just really dumb... Not dumb enough to be ganked in a freighter. Yeah, just a 3+ bil hull filled with blueprints : https://zkillboard.com/kill/18320221/ So you want concord to be buffed so they can police in null? Btw that's a total legit loss. Nothing to do with the stupidly getting ganked in highsec
What means "stupid getting ganked in high sec"? And why i should put so much effort to just move stuff from place to place for a 10-20mil ISK profit? Because some dumb ppl bored of their lifes decide to screw someones game? |
Lugh Crow-Slave
3847
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 10:04:04 -
[172] - Quote
Naye Nathaniel wrote: logging off, and on tousands of times a day
you wut m8
BLOPS Hauler
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
3847
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 10:05:35 -
[173] - Quote
Naye Nathaniel wrote: What means "stupid getting ganked in high sec"? And why i should put so much effort to just move stuff from place to place for a 10-20mil ISK profit? Because some dumb ppl bored of their lifes decide to screw someones game?
well if you want to do it safely then yes. at least they are messing with your game within the confines of the game you want to change the game to turn their game to ****
BLOPS Hauler
|
Naye Nathaniel
COBRA INC
32
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 10:06:14 -
[174] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:Naye Nathaniel wrote: logging off, and on tousands of times a day
you wut m8
https://gyazo.com/1dd70fdc995710edc2b684f7287b1185 |
Lugh Crow-Slave
3847
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 10:07:40 -
[175] - Quote
Van Doe wrote: So you want concord to be buffed so they can police in null?
Btw that's a total legit loss. Nothing to do with the stupidly getting ganked in highsec
no it has to do with stupidly hauling BPOs in a domi through null lol
BLOPS Hauler
|
Naye Nathaniel
COBRA INC
32
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 10:07:52 -
[176] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:Naye Nathaniel wrote: What means "stupid getting ganked in high sec"? And why i should put so much effort to just move stuff from place to place for a 10-20mil ISK profit? Because some dumb ppl bored of their lifes decide to screw someones game?
well if you want to do it safely then yes. at least they are messing with your game within the confines of the game you want to change the game to turn their game to ****
Im in HIGH SEC - that means i should be SAFE to do it- If i want to put so much effort for being safe - i would move my ass and go by low sec;
Being safe means I already PUT MUCH EFFORT as i changed my route from 10j to 20j; And U decide to screw MY game - and of course there is no consq for you doing that; |
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5998
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 10:19:52 -
[177] - Quote
Naye Nathaniel wrote:
Im in HIGH SEC - that means i should be SAFE to do it-
Nope.
HS means there are just more consequences for me shooting you. That's it. That for many players those consequences dissuade them from shooting you does not mean you are safe from all players.
Naye Nathaniel wrote: If i want to put so much effort for being safe - i would move my ass and go by low sec;
Maybe you should mover yourself to another game or realize how this game works. Your choice.
Naye Nathaniel wrote: Being safe means I already PUT MUCH EFFORT as i changed my route from 10j to 20j; And U decide to screw MY game - and of course there is no consq for you doing that;
Nope. Again, HS is where there are more consequences if I decide to shoot you. If I bring 29 friends and we shoot you...and your ship is blown up, and yet another friend comes along and scoops the loot and scoots...welcome to the sandbox.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
3847
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 10:24:10 -
[178] - Quote
Naye Nathaniel wrote:Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:Naye Nathaniel wrote: What means "stupid getting ganked in high sec"? And why i should put so much effort to just move stuff from place to place for a 10-20mil ISK profit? Because some dumb ppl bored of their lifes decide to screw someones game?
well if you want to do it safely then yes. at least they are messing with your game within the confines of the game you want to change the game to turn their game to **** Im in HIGH SEC - that means i should be SAFE to do it- If i want to put so much effort for being safe - i would move my ass and go by low sec;
i would like to direct you to eves FAQ where it is plainly stated that HS is not safe sec
Quote: Being safe means I already PUT MUCH EFFORT as i changed my route from 10j to 20j; And U decide to screw MY game - and of course there is no consq for you doing that;
only screw your game if i out play you. that's the game you are playing go to wow if you want a theme park this is a sandbox
BLOPS Hauler
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
3847
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 10:34:52 -
[179] - Quote
Erich Einstein wrote: To prevent alpha clones from continually being rolled and used as disposable gank toons, I propose that only omega pilots be allowed to set their safety to red, while alpha clones can only set their safety to yellow at most.
except ganking is one of the most enjoyable and accessible parts of the game for a new player. it probably generates more subs than it costs.
BLOPS Hauler
|
Dark Lord Trump
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
350
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 11:05:02 -
[180] - Quote
Erich Einstein wrote: Your likes received and the amount of repetitive posts on this thread are what is pathetic.
Maybe he receives likes because people agree with him, and the posts are repetitive because you refuse to understand them, necessitating their point being made again?
I'm going to build a big wall that will keep the Gallente out, and they're going to pay for it!
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 47 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |