Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Mikal Morataya
30
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 10:16:00 -
[151] - Quote
If it ends up Incursions pay the same as level 4s (which it wont) people would just go back to level 4s. No organisation needed, no contest. |

Esunisen
Les Tueurs de Killer Une Pour Tous
62
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 10:19:00 -
[152] - Quote
Yay, one more reason to leave the game. |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
564
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 10:21:00 -
[153] - Quote
Dzajic wrote:Ammzi wrote:A longish post Sorry mate. CCP and CSM had had these talks over a month ago. CCP and the voice of community (CSM) have agreed on those things and they will be implemented soon(tm)/ Changes according to what is agreed in minutes are likely already under testing. Yes it will be overall nerf to incursions income; especially if they hardcode so that you can't blitz any sites any longer. Though ti would end up being stupidly unbalanced with Legion fleets continuing to blitz NCOs and other 2 taking ages to finish. Ofc for maximum lulz these changes would affect all kinds of Incurions and not just high-sec so it will murder isk/hr income for everyone doing them, no matter where. Well at least it may bring attention seekers off our backs. Even if it ends not paying much more money than L4s, even for shiny fleets, it will of course remain 10000x more interesting than doing L4s Edit. With or without blitzing shiny fleet will do sites faster as they will have more DPS on field and also better tank.
What evidence do you have of them "testing" this? I heard of nothing on Sisi. |

Dzajic
29
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 10:23:00 -
[154] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Dzajic wrote:Ammzi wrote:A longish post Sorry mate. CCP and CSM had had these talks over a month ago. CCP and the voice of community (CSM) have agreed on those things and they will be implemented soon(tm)/ Changes according to what is agreed in minutes are likely already under testing. Yes it will be overall nerf to incursions income; especially if they hardcode so that you can't blitz any sites any longer. Though ti would end up being stupidly unbalanced with Legion fleets continuing to blitz NCOs and other 2 taking ages to finish. Ofc for maximum lulz these changes would affect all kinds of Incurions and not just high-sec so it will murder isk/hr income for everyone doing them, no matter where. Well at least it may bring attention seekers off our backs. Even if it ends not paying much more money than L4s, even for shiny fleets, it will of course remain 10000x more interesting than doing L4s Edit. With or without blitzing shiny fleet will do sites faster as they will have more DPS on field and also better tank. What evidence do you have of them "testing" this? I heard of nothing on Sisi.
Sorry. Really wasn't my intention to spread rumors. Its just that looking at how long CSM summit was; and that "must destroy incursions" topics have gotten some devposts saying its being looked at and we will get devblog soon(tm), I would expect changed to be on closed test server or close to deployment to it. |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
564
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 10:36:00 -
[155] - Quote
Until it gets to Sisi or announced it really isn't meaningful testing.
I want to see what CCP announces. If they limit vanguard nerfing to just forcing them to be completed it would be ok. However it is obvious that folks like darius in my opinon want them nuked from orbit. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
766
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 10:38:00 -
[156] - Quote
Dzajic wrote:Ammzi wrote:A longish post Sorry mate. CCP and CSM had had these talks over a month ago. CCP and the voice of community (CSM) have agreed on those things and they will be implemented soon(tm)/ Changes according to what is agreed in minutes are likely already under testing. .
Lol - seriously mate. What is your point and what are you talking about? And why are you sorry? I just said I completely agree with the CSM minutes on incursions... I am happy, not mad nor sad. I am excited and glad!
This "over a month ago" of yours doesn't make sense. Note in the minutes that it was stated that keymembers of the incursion communities were pulled in to comment on incursions. This includes the BTL and TDF operators.
I wouldn't expect anything to be at all close to deployment. Christmas, new year and most of all working on 1.1 crucible and the after patching of Crucible 1.0 has most likely left almost no work on incursions. CCP actually stated recently (1 week ago or so) that they have just recently established a work group on incursions. They have barely begun working on it. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
136
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 10:44:00 -
[157] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Until it gets to Sisi or announced it really isn't meaningful testing.
I want to see what CCP announces. If they limit vanguard nerfing to just forcing them to be completed it would be ok. However it is obvious that folks like darius in my opinon want them nuked from orbit.
You ask evidence without providing any about your claims.
That dude so far has created threads and made fleets about killing MOMs. Of course, while they are at the task, they will also try extracting further opportunity ISK and maybe tears.
Maybe the other guy (I don't recall the name, the one who made to EvE News) is what you talk about. |

Dzajic
29
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 10:45:00 -
[158] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Until it gets to Sisi or announced it really isn't meaningful testing.
I want to see what CCP announces. If they limit vanguard nerfing to just forcing them to be completed it would be ok. However it is obvious that folks like darius in my opinon want them nuked from orbit.
Darius maybe. But I think he and Kriss are doing it just mostly for lulz and tears; and don't really care a bit about "isk faucets" and "balance of economy". CCP and CSM agreed that they are mostly fine. Though that "mostly" can be stretched any way you want. Slight nerf to VG payout combineded with making them unblitzable would end up being a major isk/hr nerf.
And you'd need a really major buff to scouts, assaults and HQs to make them worth the time. |

XXSketchxx
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
105
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:05:00 -
[159] - Quote
Can we have a vote as to who is dumber, Endeavor or Dzajic?
This is a checkbox vote so you are allowed to check all the boxes. |

Shukuzen Kiraa
0uter Ring Excavations Outer Ring Excavations Syndicate
31
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:09:00 -
[160] - Quote
XXSketchxx wrote:Can we have a vote as to who is dumber, Endeavor or Dzajic?
This is a checkbox vote so you are allowed to check all the boxes.
I find you to be more annoying than anyone else in this thread. |
|

XXSketchxx
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
105
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:13:00 -
[161] - Quote
Shukuzen Kiraa wrote:XXSketchxx wrote:Can we have a vote as to who is dumber, Endeavor or Dzajic?
This is a checkbox vote so you are allowed to check all the boxes. I find you to be more annoying than anyone else in this thread.
I find myself not caring.
Also, please post which boxes you would like to check. |

fuer0n
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
66
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:29:00 -
[162] - Quote
XXSketchxx wrote:Can we have a vote as to who is dumber, Endeavor or Dzajic?
This is a checkbox vote so you are allowed to check all the boxes.
endeavor isnt dumb, theres a post up there about darius that hits the nail right on the head, hell check his own post history and read between the lines. start from the post where he says brick squad have split. the anger at not being able to control corp/alliance members them blaming and attacking incursions instead of looking to see what was wrong in the first place. i'll spell it out -treat your members better and they wouldnt flip you the bird and stay in hi sec doing incursions.
anyway i wouldn't worry too much about it, ccp know how valuable incursions are and they won't just take anyones word that they need a nerf/buff, they have their own people out there running incursions and are gathering opinions and solutions internally.
edit: one good thing i will say about darius and co is that they dont like something and they are doing something about it in game, if incursion runners dont like it they need to balls up and fight back. |

XXSketchxx
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
106
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 16:00:00 -
[163] - Quote
fuer0n wrote:XXSketchxx wrote:Can we have a vote as to who is dumber, Endeavor or Dzajic?
This is a checkbox vote so you are allowed to check all the boxes. endeavor isnt dumb, theres a post up there about darius that hits the nail right on the head, hell check his own post history and read between the lines. start from the post where he says brick squad have split. the anger at not being able to control corp/alliance members them blaming and attacking incursions instead of looking to see what was wrong in the first place. i'll spell it out -treat your members better and they wouldnt flip you the bird and stay in hi sec doing incursions. anyway i wouldn't worry too much about it, ccp know how valuable incursions are and they won't just take anyones word that they need a nerf/buff, they have their own people out there running incursions and are gathering opinions and solutions internally. edit: one good thing i will say about darius and co is that they dont like something and they are doing something about it in game, if incursion runners dont like it they need to balls up and fight back.
If anyone thinks Darius is doing this to get member back in fleet, they are literally dumb as hell. |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
570
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 16:18:00 -
[164] - Quote
It's EndeavoUr btw not Endeavor. |

fuer0n
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
66
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 16:18:00 -
[165] - Quote
XXSketchxx wrote:fuer0n wrote:XXSketchxx wrote:Can we have a vote as to who is dumber, Endeavor or Dzajic?
This is a checkbox vote so you are allowed to check all the boxes. endeavour isnt dumb, theres a post up there about darius that hits the nail right on the head, hell check his own post history and read between the lines. start from the post where he says brick squad have split. the anger at not being able to control corp/alliance members them blaming and attacking incursions instead of looking to see what was wrong in the first place. i'll spell it out -treat your members better and they wouldnt flip you the bird and stay in hi sec doing incursions. anyway i wouldn't worry too much about it, ccp know how valuable incursions are and they won't just take anyones word that they need a nerf/buff, they have their own people out there running incursions and are gathering opinions and solutions internally. edit: one good thing i will say about darius and co is that they dont like something and they are doing something about it in game, if incursion runners dont like it they need to balls up and fight back. If anyone thinks Darius is doing this to get member back in fleet, they are literally dumb as hell.
nope he lost them, he's just throwing all the toys out of the sandbox because some of the other kids don't want to play by his rules. |

XXSketchxx
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
106
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 17:27:00 -
[166] - Quote
fuer0n wrote:
nope he lost them, he's just throwing all the toys out of the sandbox because some of the other kids don't want to play by his rules.
there would be more people in null if it wasnt for the greedy overlords. what's funny is they can't see what ccp are doing, or they do see and it's a kneejerk reaction to save their little empires.
haha you think Brick has little empires |

fuer0n
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
67
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 18:46:00 -
[167] - Quote
XXSketchxx wrote:fuer0n wrote:
nope he lost them, he's just throwing all the toys out of the sandbox because some of the other kids don't want to play by his rules.
there would be more people in null if it wasnt for the greedy overlords. what's funny is they can't see what ccp are doing, or they do see and it's a kneejerk reaction to save their little empires.
haha you think Brick has little empires
it was a broad generalization relating to how stagnant null has become and the causes. you think ccp made insursions the way they are by accident? |

Umega
Solis Mensa
39
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 19:12:00 -
[168] - Quote
fuer0n wrote:XXSketchxx wrote:fuer0n wrote:
nope he lost them, he's just throwing all the toys out of the sandbox because some of the other kids don't want to play by his rules.
there would be more people in null if it wasnt for the greedy overlords. what's funny is they can't see what ccp are doing, or they do see and it's a kneejerk reaction to save their little empires.
haha you think Brick has little empires it was a broad generalization relating to how stagnant null has become and the causes. you think ccp made insursions the way they are by accident?
Null is stagnant? This is news to me. Oh well, I hear on the 24th it's getting a buff and will be atleast 15% longer reaching...
Seriously, maybe someone should Incursion less and look outside the highsec bubble more. |

Fronkfurter McSheebleton
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
58
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 04:05:00 -
[169] - Quote
Umega wrote:Perhaps I do underestimate. If they don't like what is happening.. they can, and should.. do something about it ingame. Like what? Complain? The incursion community is not one commonly populated by large corps and alliances. Most incursion runners do so only part time, anyway. If a big group wants to come and grief them, there's not really much they can do about it.
Quote:I don't see how I make Isk as being the slighest bit relevent. I don't do Incursions, they are boring. I don't take advantage of ppl that don't deserve it.. which is why I posted in the first place. I have no horse in this race ultimately.. because.. It's quite relevant. Unless you're into market trading or some form of industry, you proably follow some variation on "find rat > shoot rat > loot rat > repeat". How is this so different? I mean sure, you have to sell the loot (or just melt it), and there's that element of getting blown up, but really...nobody apart from wormhole players really has it any harder.
Quote:I do find this whole thing hilarious. And applaud those involved for making a stand ingame against something they dislike.. altho I think there is more to it than that.. There is, of course. This was primarily about griefing for the sake of griefing, best I can tell. Hell, the initial thread was titled "grief the bears" or something like that, wasn't it? Problem is, for the most part this isn't a large dedicated group of people that run incursions 23/7, like kriss would have you believe. It's a bunch of people that have found a good(if a little op) way to fund other things. Even the toons that DO follow them around are, often enough, alts of people that don't get to highsec very often.
Quote:It's pretty damn funny at face value. And this is EVE.. do something about it just like they are, ingame. That was and is the whole damn point of my post.. they get it, others don't and sadly never will. Again, do what, exactly? Incursion players have isk, but they don't have so much that they can drop a capital fleet on some poor drake pilot and not think twice about it. They aren't organized into a single large group. Typically, they're in smaller corporations that at best are capable of a small gang roam. They're the little guy, here.
Quote:EDIT: PvP players.. PvE players.. it is an excuse. A bullshit excuse. Everyone is an EVE player.. it is that simple. Making it more than that is denying the foundation and core of this Sandbox PvP MMO. All in the same box.. given same tools. Wait a minute, YOU'RE the one going on about how people in highsec will never "get" the game based on some obnoxious notion that they all must be absolutely terrified of stepping out of highsec or engaging in pvp. You're defining people in highsec as PVE players, and people in low/null as PVP players...completely ignoring the fact that they are often enough the same people.
Defining eve specifically as a "sandbox pvp mmo" is about as narrow minded as it gets. It's not a purely pvp based game. Never has been, never will be. It's a sandbox, plain and simple. I understand the mentality in sov space is to smash as many of the other guy's sandcastles as possible 23/7, but some people just aren't into that, and forcing it on everyone will never be good for the game. Some people just like to build sand castles once in a while, without 30 people coming over to stomp on it every time. |

Palladias
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 04:08:00 -
[170] - Quote
I'm just mad i keep missing out on the mom fleets. I'd love to join, but my timing is ****.  |
|

Umega
Solis Mensa
41
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 04:30:00 -
[171] - Quote
Fronkfurter McSheebleton wrote: Stuff..
I liked the part where you twisted words on a whim in an attempt to justify your position. Kudos.
You, I think need to make up your mind and figure out some key aspects before you draw any personal conclusions.
Are pvp pilots using alts to farm Incursions? Are they or are they not doing so with friends? Does it not take organizing to successfully handle Incursions on a repeated basis?
Sure.. I guess it is cool to flipflop your opinion on these questions, as long as in doing so it fits your arguement. What's your arguement again? I'm not sure you even know.
I didn't say highsec mains had to step outside of highsec, or be terrified. Quite the opposite. They can get off their ass and defend what they believe is theirs tho. Believing they shouldn't have to.. cause this is a sandbox like you seem to agree.. is bullshit. They should not be cuddled with extra affection.. at all. Even though they are to an extent. And because of that.. why should they be entitled to more than those that don't have the same level of 'protection' surrounding them?
This is player on player interaction. No matter how you want to slice it. People will pve.. and aquire items that are used for pvp, whether they use the items or sell them(battling to get theirs sold against other players).. is player on player interaction, pvp.
And stop being fail in simple words. I stated, repeatedly.. there is no pve, there is no pvp.. there is ONLY EVE players. Plain and simple. Why you are attempting to twist what I say and lump it up is obvious.. so knock it off. Makes you look like an idiot, quite honestly. And I don't think you are, a bit confused me thinks tho.
You.. too narrowly defined the word 'sand castle'. I take the word and broaden it.. a person's 'sand castle' in EVE to me can be their ideals, their land, their ships, to philosphy, basicly..
What They Make Of EVE For Themself.
IMO.. go for It.. defend It.. or be a lil *****. Doesn't matter who or where you are in the Game, nor what you do. Choice is yours. Choice is mine. Get it yet? |

Fronkfurter McSheebleton
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
58
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 07:12:00 -
[172] - Quote
Umega wrote:Are pvp pilots using alts to farm Incursions? Are they or are they not doing so with friends? Does it not take organizing to successfully handle Incursions on a repeated basis? Yes, often, and yes. Small scale organization, not anywhere close the the scale of a nullsec alliance.
Quote:Believing they shouldn't have to.. cause this is a sandbox like you seem to agree.. is bullshit. They should not be cuddled with extra affection.. at all. Even though they are to an extent. And because of that.. why should they be entitled to more than those that don't have the same level of 'protection' surrounding them? They aren't. In highsec, you have no moon mining, no sov (or sov upgrades), no cap ships, fail rewards from industrial professions, nearly inconsequential rewards from exploration(usually), and the need to keep your sec status and standings high enough that you don't get mobbed by npc's every time you enter, among other restrictions.
Quote:And stop being fail in simple words. I stated, repeatedly.. there is no pve, there is no pvp.. there is ONLY EVE players. Plain and simple. Why you are attempting to twist what I say and lump it up is obvious.. so knock it off. Makes you look like an idiot, quite honestly. And I don't think you are, a bit confused me thinks tho. I'm not entirely sure what you're saying when you say there is no pvp or pve..? PVE is shooting npc's and mining and whatnot, pvp is shooting people, and the occasional market war or contest over some sort of plex...simple as. Some players focus on the former, some on the latter...ergo, pvp oriented players, and pve oriented players. The interesting bit is sov players' tendency to associate highsec players with the latter type, and themselves with the former....which makes sense, I guess, but it isn't as black and white as people like kriss would have you believe.
Quote:You.. too narrowly defined the word 'sand castle'. I take the word and broaden it.. a person's 'sand castle' in EVE to me can be their ideals, their land, their ships, to philosphy, basicly..
What They Make Of EVE For Themself. Sure. But they can't do it without living in nullsec, apparently?
Quote:I didn't say highsec mains had to step outside of highsec, or be terrified. Quite the opposite. They can get off their ass and defend what they believe is theirs tho.
*merged comments*
IMO.. go for It.. defend It.. or be a lil *****. Doesn't matter who or where you are in the Game, nor what you do. Choice is yours. Choice is mine. Get it yet? Go for what? Defend what? There's no defending to be done in this case, short of a mass suicide gank against every fleet that tries to pop the mom early...which really isn't feasible with the amount of logistics on grid, not to mention the timing and level of organization that would be required, and the sheer cost of sustaining such an operation. |

Mila Rasnik
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 07:32:00 -
[173] - Quote
Mixed opinions on the whole matter. I run Incursions for a few hours once every couple of weeks so it only really affects me to a small degree.
That said:
I would like to join a fleet without worrying whether the logis are you lot planning on having us all die.
People say we should be allowed to play the way we want to play. That goes both ways. You want to kill the MOM so we can't farm? That's fine, its your choice to do that. The problem lies with your original intentions. To Grief. Your own words. Make a stand for what you believe in, but "intentional griefing" should not be allowed. Is it akin to warp scrambling someone in space and going out to the shopping?
Let us run the incursions, then pop the MOM when it shows up. I have no problem with that. Just LET US run the Incursions. Expanding your operation to hurt those flying them is out of order in my opinion, as it hurts those who don't farm them 23/7 too. Those that don't have access to a list of blacklisted pilots.
Do your thing, let us do ours. |

Darius III
Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.
517
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 08:03:00 -
[174] - Quote
Brick is a minor player in these incursion interdictions. The real hereos are Skunkworks and Kill it with fire, and of course Krissada. Special thanks to the people of Crime and Punishment who showed up in 1's and 2's. I just posted here to start a decent discussion with less trolling than you usually see in C&P. If not for LFarm and Skunkworks and the organization of Krissada none of this would be happening, this is actually set up by HISEC people.
There are so many misconceptions in this thread I am not going to bother here much. I am very amused by some of them though. As far as who is the dumbest/worst informed as to whats really going on with this thread it is hands down Endevor, by a wide margin. I have done very little trolling in this thread out of respect for the Mission and complex people who are pretty much seriusbiznuss but the temptation to troll some of these morons is strong.
XXSketchxx wrote:
If anyone thinks Darius is doing this to get member back in fleet, they are literally dumb as hell.
At least someone knows whats up. +1 Sketch
I am most definitely not the leader of Brick. I am just one of our diplomats. A job I have been pretty bad at. Trolling GSF and Test was poor judgement as was declining the 10 BN Isk contract from White Noise. Please don't take my actions as actions from Brick Squad. The fact that I have a loud voice, **** post, and drop the most SBU's, as well as being a huge attention ***** just make people falsely associate my actions with all of Brick. The cool thing about being a Brick is that you can do whatever you want where you want and whenever you want to do it. That,and we encourage trolling and losing ships:two things I am really good at.
Brick Squad has lost members and that has 0% to do with my / Bricks participation. Anyone still spinning the 0.0 Alliance power is so far off the truth as to make it not even worth arguing with them.The VAST majority of the people who came were HISEC DWELLERS.
Now can we move back to discussing the issue at hand? Is it wrong to take action against that what you find unfair in eve? If we were"out to destroy the incursion community" I 100% guarantee we wouldnt leave any of them up. As stated we left one of the incursions up on Saturday to prove to the incursion community that we are not unreasonable and negotiated in good faith.
How stupid is CCP? So stupid it took them SEVEN YEARS to make a "loot all' Button. |

Darius III
Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.
517
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 08:26:00 -
[175] - Quote
Andrea Roche wrote: The Mittani abused his postion as a CSM to initiate a war vs all mining barges in high sec. Now Darius is also abusing his position to do this. As a CSM you should not be forcing your type of gaming into the rest of eve nor should you be using your position to carry out your private vandettas OR you will fail as CSM.
My position as CSM has absolutely no bearing (no pun intended on 'bearing') on this action. Me being CSM didn't bring extra people. Anyway I stole the election by cheating so why should I care? I don't have an answer as to why I should care, but I do. The whole reason I started running incursions was to get a feel for how they worked, what they paid etc. I did this so I could make informed decisions as CSM if/when it ever came up.
Please don't compare me to Mittani it makes him look bad.
How stupid is CCP? So stupid it took them SEVEN YEARS to make a "loot all' Button. |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
593
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 08:36:00 -
[176] - Quote
It is Endeavour btw. The U is important as that letter was in the sailing ship to the space shuttle.
And while you despise my posting. You never went through with your incursion mothership busting because of my posts. Was it not for the lulz and watching Endeavour scream? Or do you truly fear the potential of a unified hisec to defeat you in the next election? |

Umega
Solis Mensa
43
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 08:50:00 -
[177] - Quote
Fronkfurter McSheebleton wrote: More stuff..
You are far too jaded and biased.. maybe ignorant, but nah I don't think so. You dice your words (and mine) decently well and I think are more aware to the point than leading on. You're hampered in some manner by these events, it would seem. So do the twist!
I'll leave you with this..
Do you really believe it takes a mass super gank? That is a really lame excuse, to go over the top with one and only strategy, that obviously implies much loss to make it not worth an effort. Really Lame, man. Do what ya got to do.. if make excuses is how you want to defend your position with ingame events.. I feel a tad sorry for you.
Here's a hint.. 'know your enemy'. It is all in the Golden Rule.
Short of a Mass gank.. heh. |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
983
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 10:31:00 -
[178] - Quote
Darius III wrote: Soon you will not be able to count on having an incursion available to you 23/7. We will be killing the rest of the MS all at one time in a few days if negotiations with the BLT and TDF leaders fall apart.
We expect CCP to step in and spawn more/change the mechanic that makes them spawn.
After killing/forcing the MS to be killed, there were 700 in public incursion channel. So we made a fake logi fleet and got @15 BS killed by luring them and not repping them once aggro came in.
I am interested in hearing from a broader audience than Crime and Punishment about our actions.
Approve or disapprove and why?
At first glance this thread could be viewed as information about Sansha Incursions which is pertinent to 'Missions & Complexes' sub forum channel. However, in reality it doesn't even remotely pertain to 'Missions & Complexes'.
The initial opening statement in the OP pertains to Corporation/Alliance politics and basically is an open declaration of war regarding Sansha Incursions. This fact alone shows this thread is in the wrong sub forum channel and as such should be moved to 'Corporation, Alliance & Organization Discussions'.
The next statement makes reference to CCP making possible changes to game play mechanics regarding Sansha Incursions which at this time is mostly conjecture from the OP. This fact alone shows this thread is in the wrong sub forum channel and as such should be moved to 'Features & Ideas Discussion' or 'Issues, Workarounds & Localization'.
Then the OP makes reference about completing a site and then gloats about creating a fake Logi Fleet to facilitate the destruction of other players ships. This fact alone shows this thread is in the wrong sub forum channel and as such should be moved to 'Crime & Punishment'.
Last but not least, the OP asks the community members here to participate in a discussion and post their viewpoints, both pro and con, about this thread without actually benefiting from the answers. This fact alone shows this thread is in the wrong sub forum channel and as such should be moved to 'Eve General Discussion'.
Now if there's already a similar thread active somewhere else in these forums, then this thread needs to be locked. Some might argue that it could pertain to 'Missions & Complexes' serving as a warning about Sansha Incursions. However, due to the lack of detail and the various topics contained in the OP, that is not the case. Personally I think the original post of this thread is actually just a rant looking to incite a flame war as well as a gloat looking to gain fame and notoriety. Either way it doesn't belong in 'Missions & Complexes' and as such is now being reported. |

Fronkfurter McSheebleton
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 10:46:00 -
[179] - Quote
Umega wrote:*snip* Do you really believe it takes a mass super gank? *snip*
Well, the problem here, is that they were taking incursions down early to grief people...all that requires is a fleet of about 40 people(though ideally about 80), and a bit of time. The only way to stop the fleet from doing so, is to remove them. Only way to likk an incursion fleet in highsec, really, is to kill or jam the logis...both of which would require a mass suicide gank, since the mom site requires quite a few logi ships and the majority of them would have to go down.
The only other offensive action that could be taken is to attack those guys on their home turf...which won't happen, because they're much bigger than anything the incursion community could muster with any sort of regularity.
I mean I guess there's always merc corps, but even for incursion runners I'd imagine hiring enough mercs to take on an alliance or two would be prohibitively expensive....not to mention the logistics of finding that many in the first place.
Also, if it's anything like last time, everyone will have forgotten about all of this in two weeks anyway..so it's not really worth it IMO. : / |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard
775
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 18:15:00 -
[180] - Quote
Fronkfurter McSheebleton wrote:The only other offensive action that could be taken is to attack those guys on their home turf...which won't happen, because they're much bigger than anything the incursion community could muster with any sort of regularity.
Really? The incursion community couldn't muster a few dozen PVP ships to group up and wardec us? It's not that they lack numbers, it's that they lack the will (or maybe the courage) to actually do it.
Fronkfurter McSheebleton wrote:I mean I guess there's always merc corps, but even for incursion runners I'd imagine hiring enough mercs to take on an alliance or two would be prohibitively expensive....not to mention the logistics of finding that many in the first place.
Because hiring mercenaries has worked so well for them in the past. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |