| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Dmian
Gallenterrorisme
4
   |
Posted - 2012.01.23 22:08:00 -
[61] - Quote
Sarmatiko wrote:Tarchus wrote:
Why this awkward change ?
YYYY:DD:MM it's like an american standard. Ugly just like their imperial system. Should i say it's useless, as well ?
YYYY:DD:MM = ISO 8601Americans have MM:DD:YYYY sequence. Maybe ISO 8601 was chosen like compromise?
ISO 8601 is [YYYY]-[MM]-[DD], not [YYYY]-[DD]-[MM] |
Tarchus
Lets Get Rocked
Important Internet Spaceship League
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 22:18:00 -
[62] - Quote
Hm..
This means it's a typo in the patch notes ?
Hm... Going further, if it's one typo in the patch notes it could be another typo in the patch notes. Or all the notes are a typo. LOL |
Sarmatiko
457
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 22:31:00 -
[63] - Quote
Dmian wrote:ISO 8601 is [YYYY]-[MM]-[DD], not [YYYY]-[DD]-[MM]
Good catch. There is mistake in patch notes.
In the game date format [YYYY]-[MM]-[DD]
http://i.imgur.com/sKs5e.png |
Witchking Angmar
Perkele.
15
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 22:40:00 -
[64] - Quote
All these UI fixes lately, but you can't seem to fix the item exchange/auction window where you can no longer click on the info icon to find in contracts. |
Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises
Ev0ke
47
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 23:36:00 -
[65] - Quote
Quote:The Warp Disruption Field Generator II module now works correctly up to its max range as indicated under its attributes.
Thank you. |
Good Fellow
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 00:29:00 -
[66] - Quote
1) (The one downside of the Fuel Blocks approach is that it's impossible to give faction towers a fuel consumption bonus any more (you can't consume 2/3 of a block). The devs talked to some large-scale starbase operators about this, and they were told that the main bonus of faction towers for them is actually that they last longer between fuel cycles. To try and compensate for the increased running costs, they've taken the above bay size increases and added +25% bay size on top of that for the "tier 1" faction towers, and +50% bay size for the "tier 2" faction towers. )
2) (Faction towers use 10% less fuel for the "tier 1" variety and 20% less fuel for the "tier 2" variety.)
So there is no longer a reduced cost to running faction pos's or is there because in 2 locations it says different things.
There is also no mention of what happens to starbase charters for high sec pos's.
|
Cordo Draken
ABOS Industrial Enterprises
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 02:01:00 -
[67] - Quote
BeanBagKing wrote:Quote:All Assault Ships now have a new Role Bonus: 50% reduction in MicroWarpdrive signature radius penalty I still think an afterburner bonus of some kind would have been much better. Can't wait for 1.1 :)
Agreed. These aren't interceptors... The majority of AFs are fit with ABs, so WTH? AFs should be Elite Dogfighters not kitters, plus their cap doesn't exactly scream MWD, not for me anyway. The Role Bonus should encompass the definition of "Assualt" Frigate. As with this bonus, it screams "runaway" frigate.
I will say, I do like the majority of the 4th bonuses and added slot locations. Jury is still out on some that I care to fly, but overall I like the added Love to AFs!
eëÆWhomever said, "You only get one shot to make a good impression," was utterly wrong. I've made plenty of great impressions with my AutocannonseëÆ eÉà |
Stridsflygplan
Back Breaker Battalion
Back Breaker Brigade
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 02:10:00 -
[68] - Quote
All Assault Ships now have a new Role Bonus: 50% reduction in MicroWarpdrive signature radius penalty...
WTF why did you have to make all assault ships, interceptor wanna bes. There should be a bigger gap betwin the ship roles.
A 50% bonus to afterburner speed would have been so much better.
Assault ships role should be more of heavy tackling compared to interceptors. with good tanks and good damage. Sure they still have that but they will still take extra damage from the increased sig rad and will still be too slow with afterburners fitted.
Change it or give them a double role bonus:
All Assault Ships now have a new Role Bonus: 50% bonus to afterburner speed and 50% reduction in MicroWarpdrive signature radius penalty.
Otherwise a really good job CCP! keep it up 
|
Rasz Lin
43
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 02:26:00 -
[69] - Quote
Witchking Angmar wrote:All these UI fixes lately, but you can't seem to fix the item exchange/auction window where you can no longer click on the info icon to find in contracts.
+1 |
Miss President
SOLARIS ASTERIUS
21
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 02:28:00 -
[70] - Quote
Overall good improvements CCP.
One thing I have reservations about is giving bonus to expanded scan probe launchers
I've been doing exploration since old scan engine, and you've came and destroyed a highly specialized skill set extremely dependent on skills and simplified it. Ok, so you made it more interactive and easier to use for average Joe .
Then you changed the scanning engine, that a pretty much noob can do it. But why boost the bonus now?
Previously skilled players will benefit, but those who haven't invested same skills and implants get a free boost at scanning??
Really, training scanning skills to level 4 is not such a big deal so that an average Joe could work on an interactive and simple and scanning engine.
I think this change should not be made. I do not understand what kind of complaints lead you guys to improve this bonus? Just give the faction one faster probe launch rate and be done with it. I think more people will appreciate it better. (Tech II can improve probe launch rate as well)
|
RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed
RED.Legion
1264
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 04:15:00 -
[71] - Quote
Good Fellow wrote:1) (The one downside of the Fuel Blocks approach is that it's impossible to give faction towers a fuel consumption bonus any more (you can't consume 2/3 of a block). The devs talked to some large-scale starbase operators about this, and they were told that the main bonus of faction towers for them is actually that they last longer between fuel cycles. To try and compensate for the increased running costs, they've taken the above bay size increases and added +25% bay size on top of that for the "tier 1" faction towers, and +50% bay size for the "tier 2" faction towers. )
2) (Faction towers use 10% less fuel for the "tier 1" variety and 20% less fuel for the "tier 2" variety.)
So there is no longer a reduced cost to running faction pos's or is there because in 2 locations it says different things.
There is also no mention of what happens to starbase charters for high sec pos's.
The first was when the BPCs were to make 4 blocks/run (and a Large tower ate 4/hr). They now make 40 (and a large tower eats 40). They added the 0 so that Faction POSes work and Sov works on smaller POSes.
Charters are unchanged.
Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes. |
RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed
RED.Legion
1264
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 04:17:00 -
[72] - Quote
CCP wrote:
Windows from Crucible 1.0.4 to Crucible 1.1 is 31 MB
Windows full client 5 GB
Mac from Crucible 1.0.4 to Crucible 1.1 is 37 MB
Mac full client 5.9 GB
Why these hurtful lies? I've never seen an Eve installation run less than 10gb. Why the disparity?
Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes. |
Kumq uat
Mercurialis Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
91
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 05:42:00 -
[73] - Quote
Dear Kumquat,
We at CEE CEE PEE have noticed you like to run around in assault ships with afterburners and halo implants. Instead we are going to make it have a MWD bonus just to **** you off. Also good luck hitting with your blasters and keeping cap stable.
Regards,
CEE CEE PEE |
ORCACommander
Astral Synthetics
5
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 06:26:00 -
[74] - Quote
How dare you reduce the quality of my High Quality Screenshots! I WANT uncompressed bitmaps.
i will forgive you for not black ops buff this item since you had your handful with the assault frigates but i expect it next major patch
i do not aprove the ammo name change for missiles. i am gona have to learn a whole new system >_<
Finally work on collision with accell gates. lets hope it works
Thank god for the watch list changes. much love there |
Katowen
25
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 07:32:00 -
[75] - Quote
Tarchus wrote:Deitis Surtic wrote:Divine Eternity wrote:Quote: Improved readability of the skill queue finishing time text in the Training Queue window. It will now read "Completes on YYYY.DD.MM at HH:MM What type of date format is that? Why don't you stick to ISO if you have an international game? I really recommend you to check the different standards for calendar dates, for beginners this is sufficient: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_date +1 CCP: If you're going to make up your own confusing date standards, at least do it with style. I personally suggest YDMD.MY.YY! +2 Why this awkward change ? YYYY:DD:MM it's like an american standard. Ugly just like their imperial system. Should i say it's useless, as well ? 1. Why this format ? It's that practical ? It's that easy to read and comprehend ? 2. DD:MM:YYYY It's the way to go. YYYY should be on last place because it doesn't change so often like DD or MM. And not to add that this awful change will send all people who didn't read the patch notes into haze. This change have to be the stupidest change from the new CCP.
If CCP *really* cared about our opinions and wanted us to be happy with changes like this, they would ALLOW us to select our OWN date/time displays in the options to be used anywhere from the common ISO standards available. That way, no matter what country you are in, you can pick a format that suites you the best. This is just LAZY programming from CCP.
Just like the new font...They were too LAZY to allow us to keep the old, use new or some other fonts....
Katowen |
Tarchus
Lets Get Rocked
Important Internet Spaceship League
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 07:53:00 -
[76] - Quote
Katowen, the explanation it's very simple:
We are allowed to be free only within the boundaries set by CCP.
This the truth, even if we dont like it. I understood this and it makes me very sad.
Or, if you want another analogy: playing a mmorpg it's like living in a communist country: you do as you are told and you dont question leaders' decisions. |
Specialist Shardani
Viziam
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 09:22:00 -
[77] - Quote
ORCACommander wrote:How dare you reduce the quality of my High Quality Screenshots! I WANT uncompressed bitmaps.
Ever heard of lossless compression? PNG is a superior format to BMP in every way.
Katowen wrote:Just like the new font...They were too LAZY to allow us to keep the old, use new or some other fonts....
ORLY? Go ahead, you design an international font that supports several RADICALLY different character sets and let me know how it went. Also, readability improved by leaps and bounds with the new font and that's not an opinion, it's fact. |
Terrorfrodo
Deep Space Darwinian Law Enforcement Agency
17
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 09:25:00 -
[78] - Quote
Changes look awesome overall.
I mislike the skill thing though. New players may want to see their current skill all the time because it changes often. Older players who train skills that take weeks or months don't want to see all the time that they'll finish their skill in two months... they *know* that. Besides, every serious player uses EVEmon. So I hope that part of the UI is optional but it doesn't sound like it is. |
Ancy Denaries
Frontier Venture
134
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:06:00 -
[79] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:CCP wrote:
Windows from Crucible 1.0.4 to Crucible 1.1 is 31 MB
Windows full client 5 GB
Mac from Crucible 1.0.4 to Crucible 1.1 is 37 MB
Mac full client 5.9 GB
Why these hurtful lies? I've never seen an Eve installation run less than 10gb. Why the disparity?
Gnn, ignorance! It's download size, not completed install size.
"Shoot at anything that moves. If it doesn't move, shoot it anyway, it might move later."
"Do not be too positive. The light at the end of the tunnel could be a train." - Franz Kafka |
Mnengli Noiliffe
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:28:00 -
[80] - Quote
Actually, YYYY:MM:DD is the best since it retains date order after being sorted by simple algorithm that only looks at character codes. Very handy for naming files and directories or any other items that are likely to be sorted by name.
YYYY:DD:MM is the abomination with no sense or purpose. Is this some kind of local Icelandic tradition to write dates like that? Because European is DD:MM:YYYY and American is MM:DD:YYYY as far as i know. |
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
1737
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:39:00 -
[81] - Quote
Mnengli Noiliffe wrote:Actually, YYYY:MM:DD is the best since it retains date order after being sorted by simple algorithm that only looks at character codes. Very handy for naming files and directories or any other items that are likely to be sorted by name.
YYYY:DD:MM is the abomination with no sense or purpose. Is this some kind of local Icelandic tradition to write dates like that? Because European is DD:MM:YYYY and American is MM:DD:YYYY as far as i know.
Either CCP is being fearless again (Meaning slowly advancing by plowing through waist deep snowbanks, when there is a clear and easy path going the same way a short distance to the side.) or they fudged the patch notes. |
Katowen
26
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 11:03:00 -
[82] - Quote
Specialist Shardani wrote:ORCACommander wrote:How dare you reduce the quality of my High Quality Screenshots! I WANT uncompressed bitmaps. Ever heard of lossless compression? PNG is a superior format to BMP in every way.
For saving space on a disk, yeah, PNG may be better. But once the graphic is loaded into memory, EVERYTHING is raw data (BMP format, minus disk header info). So, NO, PNG isn't superior in every way because you have to take the time to decompress it in memory before it is displayed....:P
Katowen wrote:Just like the new font...They were too LAZY to allow us to keep the old, use new or some other fonts....
Specialist Shardani wrote:ORLY? Go ahead, you design an international font that supports several RADICALLY different character sets and let me know how it went. Also, readability improved by leaps and bounds with the new font and that's not an opinion, it's fact.
And yes, I have designed fonts for international customers. Also, Russian, German, Icelandic, American, etc are easy compared to Chinese and Arabic character sets.
CCP can do it, they just take the QUICK way out of things. Cost vs Time....If they ever want to be a draw in bigger crowds, they'll learn that sometimes little things can make a HUGH difference.
Katowen |
Mjana
Switzerland EVE Corp.
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 11:06:00 -
[83] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:Then this **** happens. Experimental, limited and prototype MWD? Make them all prototype I say!
"Quad LiF Fueled Booster Rockets" => "Prototype 100MN MicroWarpdrive I"
"Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon Microwarpdrive" => "Experimental 10MN MicroWarpdrive I"
"Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters" => "Limited 1MN MicroWarpdrive I"
And the awkward one.
"Phased Monopropellant I Hydrazine Boosters" => "Upgraded 1MN Microwarpdrive I"
If the point was to make is simpler to search for the correct modules in the market, what's the reason behind these names?
Sarmatiko wrote:Meta 1 - Upgraded
Meta 2 - Limited
Meta 3 - Experimental
Meta 4 - Prototype
Named by rarity I think.
Well, seems Sarmatiko is right. I never noticed the MWDs have all different Meta levels.
The real question is: WHY do they have different Meta levels if they all (except for hydrazine) provide the same bonus? It would have been a lot less confusing just adjusting their meta levels to be in line with the AB modules to keep the naming less confusing... -.- |
Wallis Jenkins
Xenobytes
Stain Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 11:08:00 -
[84] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote: ...and is expected to be completed by 12:00 UTC.
You really believe this?)
|
Samuel Wess
SW Consulting
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 11:16:00 -
[85] - Quote
I was expecting a fix on the overview showing wrong distances to ships especially when jumping into a gang and trying to take distance. Maybe its fixed without making it to patch notes ? |
Exsosus
Vita Aequitas Veritas
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 11:25:00 -
[86] - Quote
Sarmatiko wrote:Dmian wrote:ISO 8601 is [YYYY]-[MM]-[DD], not [YYYY]-[DD]-[MM] Good catch. There is mistake in patch notes. In the game date format [YYYY]-[MM]-[DD] http://i.imgur.com/sKs5e.pngAlso there is russian localization bug in current SiSi client on character skill page (bug report ID 125976).
Hi Sarmatiko,
For your information, when you write a bug report number like you have done here, we cannot read the bug report because its a private report between you and CCP, according to what I have been told by a dev. Could you please paste the bug here? I'm sure others are wondering what the bug was. |
IZZY EPIC
Project Nemesis
Moar Tears
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 11:26:00 -
[87] - Quote
Enyo now has 3 mids, it has the ability to dictate range.. it just became the best assault frig..
harpy resist bonus is tasty too! |
Neermark
Endoskopien INC
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 11:31:00 -
[88] - Quote
So when will the server get back online? |
Yophant
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
31
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 11:42:00 -
[89] - Quote
Neermark wrote:So when will the server get back online?
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=61355&find=unread
Downtime has been extended to 12:20 UTC. |
Florestan Bronstein
United Highsec Front
The 99 Percent
396
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 11:46:00 -
[90] - Quote
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Sarmatiko wrote:Patch notes missing info about renames of some propulsion modules:
"Quad LiF Fueled Booster Rockets" => "Prototype 100MN MicroWarpdrive I"
"LiF Fueled Booster Rockets" => "Experimental 100MN Afterburner I"
"Phased Monopropellant I Hydrazine Boosters" => "Upgraded 1MN Microwarpdrive I"
"Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters" => "Limited 1MN MicroWarpdrive I"
"Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon Microwarpdrive" => "Experimental 10MN MicroWarpdrive I"
"Monopropellant Hydrazine Boosters" => "Limited 1MN Afterburner I"
"Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters" => "Experimental 1MN Afterburner I"
"Y-S8 Hydrocarbon Afterburners" => "Experimental 10MN Afterburner I" Why they rename all the modules i dont know 
(a) nerf fittings storage, forcing people to export their fittings to XML
(b) change module names so old fittings can't be imported from XML
(c) ???
(d) Profit! |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |