You can now reorder your watch list by dragging and dropping pilots around in it.

Yay, my wish went into the patch!


Posted here

Probably because I gave them a hint where to take the code from

Ishkur
GùªNew bonus: 10% bonus to drone hitpoints per level

what happend with the towers and 1/2/4

now its 10/20/40



???????????????

Welcome to last year, the amounts were changed ages ago

The storage capacity on all Planetary Interaction storage pins has been increased from 5000m3 to 12000m3 so that it may better compete with the space port.

well in dont read every devblog ccp send

seems sad now i dident spend more time reading then playing

2 then find out a evil priest made things move 4 the worse

Awesome, can't wait to try out the neo-neocom.

By the way, when are we getting the next batch of V3'd ships?

what happend with the towers and 1/2/4

now its 10/20/40



???????????????

Great work, not sure if i have missed it but was there a fix due in regards to corporation bookmarks andbeing able to choose between personal and corporation locations when making a bookmark?

Can you confirm if the above name changes will be in the patch? I can't seem to find any changes on Sisi other than the change to missile names.

The Nighthawk description now more accurately describes its abilities.

The storage capacity on all Planetary Interaction storage pins has been increased from 5000m3 to 12000m3 so that it may better compete with the space port.

In order to simplify the naming system in EVE, the following changes have been made to Weapons & Ammunition:

All EM missiles will now have the name GÇÿMjolnirGÇÖ.
All Thermal missiles will now have the name GÇÿInfernoGÇÖ.
All Kinetic missiles will now have the name GÇÿTraumaGÇÖ.
All Explosive missiles will now have the name GÇÿNovaGÇÖ.

Seriously? how much dumbing down do you have to do? Cmon CCP EvE's variety and complexity is what makes it what it is and what we love, if i want a game thats beatable by a 3 yr old i will play farmville.

All Assault Ships now have a new Role Bonus: 50% reduction in MicroWarpdrive signature radius penalty

I'm sorry but the current way that the modules/ammo/guns/implants/boosters and all are "named" are a complete cluster-F.

I've been playin' this game quite a while and unless you have a stellar memory trying to remember what each name is in regards to what you want is almost impossible.

Having to show info on every single module to find the right one for the right circumstance is a huge time sink. I applaud the renaming...

Improved readability of the skill queue finishing time text in the Training Queue window. It will now read "Completes on YYYY.DD.MM at HH:MM

What type of date format is that? Why don't you stick to ISO if you have an international game? I really recommend you to check the different standards for calendar dates, for beginners this is sufficient:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_date

Looks like you forgot FoF missiles, they all still have their old names.

When you use a certain group of modules/ammo/implants a lot, you do memorize the names and become familiar with the nomenclature. You become specialized in those areas. It makes sense that when you go outside your specialization that you have to put more effort into it.

The storage capacity on all Planetary Interaction storage pins has been increased from 5000m3 to 12000m3 so that it may better compete with the space port.

All Kinetic missiles will now have the name 'Trauma'.
All Explosive missiles will now have the name 'Nova'.

And that helps the new player experience how? I get your point, but you shouldn't have to get a degree in eve module naming 101 in order to figure out what modules and other stuff you want to fit to your ship or your Eve character. The current naming schema makes absolutely no logical sense.

I applaud the renaming; it'll cause a lot less confusion for the new players, and for the old players that just want a quicker way to sift through the module lego box.

And that helps the new player experience how? I get your point, but you shouldn't have to get a degree in eve module naming 101 in order to figure out what modules and other stuff you want to fit to your ship or your Eve character. The current naming schema makes absolutely no logical sense.

I applaud the renaming; it'll cause a lot less confusion for the new players, and for the old players that just want a quicker way to sift through the module lego box.

All Tech 2 blueprints will no longer have market entries. Any blueprint that's ever been used for manufacturing or research cannot be listed on the market, which is assumed to apply to all T2 BPOs, and having a market entry for them is causing showinfo to have a "view market details" button rather than "find in contracts".

what?

All Tech 2 blueprints will no longer have market entries. Any blueprint that's ever been used for manufacturing or research cannot be listed on the market, which is assumed to apply to all T2 BPOs, and having a market entry for them is causing showinfo to have a "view market details" button rather than "find in contracts".

what?

Patch notes missing info about renames of some propulsion modules:

"Quad LiF Fueled Booster Rockets" => "Prototype 100MN MicroWarpdrive I"
"LiF Fueled Booster Rockets" => "Experimental 100MN Afterburner I"
"Phased Monopropellant I Hydrazine Boosters" => "Upgraded 1MN Microwarpdrive I"
"Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters" => "Limited 1MN MicroWarpdrive I"
"Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon Microwarpdrive" => "Experimental 10MN MicroWarpdrive I"
"Monopropellant Hydrazine Boosters" => "Limited 1MN Afterburner I"
"Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters" => "Experimental 1MN Afterburner I"
"Y-S8 Hydrocarbon Afterburners" => "Experimental 10MN Afterburner I"

Why they rename all the modules i dont know

If the point was to make is simpler to search for the correct modules in the market, what's the reason behind these names?

All Kinetic missiles will now have the name 'Trauma'.

+1

CCP: If you're going to make up your own confusing date standards, at least do it with style. I personally suggest YDMD.MY.YY!

Why this awkward change ?
YYYY:DD:MM it's like an american standard. Ugly just like their imperial system. Should i say it's useless, as well ?

+2

Why this awkward change ?
YYYY:DD:MM it's like an american standard. Ugly just like their imperial system. Should i say it's useless, as well ?

1. Why this format ? It's that practical ? It's that easy to read and comprehend ?

2. DD:MM:YYYY It's the way to go. YYYY should be on last place because it doesn't change so often like DD or MM.
And not to add that this awful change will send all people who didn't read the patch notes into haze.

This change have to be the stupidest change from the new CCP.

YYYY:DD:MM = ISO 8601
Americans have MM:DD:YYYY sequence.

Maybe ISO 8601 was chosen like compromise?

ISO 8601 is [YYYY]-[MM]-[DD], not [YYYY]-[DD]-[MM]

The Warp Disruption Field Generator II module now works correctly up to its max range as indicated under its attributes.

I still think an afterburner bonus of some kind would have been much better.

Can't wait for 1.1 :)

All these UI fixes lately, but you can't seem to fix the item exchange/auction window where you can no longer click on the info icon to find in contracts.

1) (The one downside of the Fuel Blocks approach is that it's impossible to give faction towers a fuel consumption bonus any more (you can't consume 2/3 of a block). The devs talked to some large-scale starbase operators about this, and they were told that the main bonus of faction towers for them is actually that they last longer between fuel cycles. To try and compensate for the increased running costs, they've taken the above bay size increases and added +25% bay size on top of that for the "tier 1" faction towers, and +50% bay size for the "tier 2" faction towers. )

2) (Faction towers use 10% less fuel for the "tier 1" variety and 20% less fuel for the "tier 2" variety.)

So there is no longer a reduced cost to running faction pos's or is there because in 2 locations it says different things.

There is also no mention of what happens to starbase charters for high sec pos's.

Windows from Crucible 1.0.4 to Crucible 1.1 is 31 MB
Windows full client 5 GB
Mac from Crucible 1.0.4 to Crucible 1.1 is 37 MB
Mac full client 5.9 GB

+2

Why this awkward change ?
YYYY:DD:MM it's like an american standard. Ugly just like their imperial system. Should i say it's useless, as well ?

1. Why this format ? It's that practical ? It's that easy to read and comprehend ?

2. DD:MM:YYYY It's the way to go. YYYY should be on last place because it doesn't change so often like DD or MM.
And not to add that this awful change will send all people who didn't read the patch notes into haze.

This change have to be the stupidest change from the new CCP.

How dare you reduce the quality of my High Quality Screenshots! I WANT uncompressed bitmaps.

Just like the new font...They were too LAZY to allow us to keep the old, use new or some other fonts....

Why these hurtful lies? I've never seen an Eve installation run less than 10gb. Why the disparity?

Actually, YYYY:MM:DD is the best since it retains date order after being sorted by simple algorithm that only looks at character codes. Very handy for naming files and directories or any other items that are likely to be sorted by name.

YYYY:DD:MM is the abomination with no sense or purpose. Is this some kind of local Icelandic tradition to write dates like that? Because European is DD:MM:YYYY and American is MM:DD:YYYY as far as i know.

Ever heard of lossless compression? PNG is a superior format to BMP in every way.

Just like the new font...They were too LAZY to allow us to keep the old, use new or some other fonts....

ORLY? Go ahead, you design an international font that supports several RADICALLY different character sets and let me know how it went. Also, readability improved by leaps and bounds with the new font and that's not an opinion, it's fact.

Then this **** happens. Experimental, limited and prototype MWD? Make them all prototype I say!
"Quad LiF Fueled Booster Rockets" => "Prototype 100MN MicroWarpdrive I"
"Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon Microwarpdrive" => "Experimental 10MN MicroWarpdrive I"
"Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters" => "Limited 1MN MicroWarpdrive I"

And the awkward one.
"Phased Monopropellant I Hydrazine Boosters" => "Upgraded 1MN Microwarpdrive I"

If the point was to make is simpler to search for the correct modules in the market, what's the reason behind these names?

Meta 1 - Upgraded
Meta 2 - Limited
Meta 3 - Experimental
Meta 4 - Prototype

Named by rarity I think.

...and is expected to be completed by 12:00 UTC.

Good catch. There is mistake in patch notes.
In the game date format [YYYY]-[MM]-[DD]
http://i.imgur.com/sKs5e.png

Also there is russian localization bug in current SiSi client on character skill page (bug report ID 125976).

So when will the server get back online?

Why they rename all the modules i dont know

What type of date format is that? Why don't you stick to ISO if you have an international game? I really recommend you to check the different standards for calendar dates, for beginners this is sufficient:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_date

^ This. Half of the world will get confused by your en-US date formatting.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=61355&find=unread

Downtime has been extended to 12:20 UTC.

And that helps the new player experience how? I get your point, but you shouldn't have to get a degree in eve module naming 101 in order to figure out what modules and other stuff you want to fit to your ship or your Eve character. The current naming schema makes absolutely no logical sense.

I applaud the renaming; it'll cause a lot less confusion for the new players, and for the old players that just want a quicker way to sift through the module lego box.

/me sends a thesaurus to iceland. A kinetic trauma I get when i drive too fast with bicycle against garage door. a psychological when i sometimes read the patch notes :P . Nova comes from stella nova and describes a nuclear fusion process, ok the explosion might be an result so that is acceptable a bit, but still the word 'new missile' (nova=new) comes to mind lol.

Visual Studio upgrade from 2005 to 2010???

Besides, if you are going to name ALL EXPLOSIVE MISSILES "Nova", why do you need to introduce NEW KEYWORD nomenclature to do that? You might as well just call them "Explosive Heavy Assault Missile" and "Kinetic FOF Cruise Missile" and be done with ALL the nomenclature.

Now you just going from 4 unique keywords per missile class, where each one allowed to search for the particular damage type of a particular class of missile to 4 keywords, one per damage type, which we will need to learn again.

If you want to retain the "sci-fi" style designation, and leave the keywords in there. Then just use the old ones and go like

"Mjolnir EMP Torpedo"
"Gremlin EMP Rocket"

instead of
"Mjolnir Torpedo"
"Mjolnir Rocket"
"Mjolnir Heavy Assault Missile"

server up

server up

so server has another hour before its up?

You Wrong

(a) nerf fittings storage, forcing people to export their fittings to XML
(b) change module names so old fittings can't be imported from XML
(c) ???
(d) Profit!

you checked

If this turns out to be true, and screws over my EFT archive. I'll be very angry.

I have almost 1000 fits in that.

(a) nerf fittings storage, forcing people to export their fittings to XML
(b) change module names so old fittings can't be imported from XML
(c) ???
(d) Profit!

You are onto something here.
Noticed that Y-S8 and Y-T8 weren't properly importing for weeks?
I smell fittings slots for AUR here. Incarna Crysis all over again.

i wonder how many heart attacks were caused when reading this first words of one patch notes sentence:

"All Tech 2 blueprints will no longer..."

My heart rate went up for sure!

YYYY:DD:MM is the abomination with no sense or purpose.

This patch is pointless really aside from the bug fixes. The assault frigate thing is kinda nice but ultimatly it's just going to trigger more ship balancing down the line. So everyone be ready for the interceptor balance patch, the electronic warfare balance patch etc.

CCP, stop listening to all the strange sad gits who play your game (basically anyone who actually goes to the fanfest) and sort the game out, its simple:

ADD MORE EMPIRE, ADD MORE NULL and please give us Jove space access already :P. All this stuff you keep adding and changing is wasting everyones time. This game was at it's best when it felt vast, i've not felt that since the warp to 0km and increase in server traffic :(.

Renaming modules? Thats going to go the same way as the stupid new modules icons that were rolled back.

Oh and one more thing, just give yourselves enough time with a patch? Being strung along is the most infuriating thing for anyone "just another hour, oh actually just another two, oh no another three". People don't mind not being able to play for 6 hours or so every now and again, but they do mind being messed about by your "estimated uptimes".


Rant over,

Eve is still fun though so at least we all have that! :D

o/

Okay, i just installed EVE patch and got "Verification failure" error window.
Repair.exe located in my eve folder doesn't fix that problem. Good job, CCP.

Should i reload client and reconfigure every tweaked parameter in the game?
:(

mood: upset

CCP, stop listening to all the strange sad gits who play your game (basically anyone who actually goes to the fanfest) and sort the game out

ADD MORE EMPIRE, ADD MORE NULL and please give us Jove space access already :P.


Oh and one more thing, just give yourselves enough time with a patch? Being strung along is the most infuriating thing for anyone "just another hour, oh actually just another two, oh no another three". People don't mind not being able to play for 6 hours or so every now and again, but they do mind being messed about by your "estimated uptimes".



o/

no just wait for the updater to reprompt you for patching

ADD MORE EMPIRE, ADD MORE NULL and please give us Jove space access already :P.

Sure. But why did they gave us a patch link then? :(
Nevermind.

Dear CCP developers, you clearly have too much time and too little to do judgeing by this neocom improvment that was not even needed.

Next time your looking for something to use your payed development time may i propose little things like:

• POS mechanics desperatly needeing upgrade
• More upgrades to SOV systems Ihub
• Science&industry interface needeing update as well, takes 10-11 click to launch invention jobs ( Remember how PI was at introduction? Click fest, so please fix science&industry as well please ).
• Large fleet fights, did you ever figure out why it performed so well and then you broke it and exactly how you broke it? Now we have this bublegum fix called timedilution....
• Corporate roles and access overhaul to allow finer access controlls...
• How about allow pos structures to be build on pos assembly array? Little funny that we can assemble Titans (Large enough to cause tidal effects on planets oceans...) in pos but not large pos tower that only takes 8000 m3 of space once completed...
• Generals science & industry rewamp? How about construction ship? Large as orca, slow as freighter and cant move when building, slow assembly lines as well..

And thats just few out of my head in coffe brake at work... Paying customer with 6 accounts... Should really master secrets of ISK and start play for free....

you can simply open your archive with notepad and change it yourself to make it compatible again.

For all who think the patch is really good (I also find some good stuff in it), do you wanna bet how dear it will cost us? I will bet on 5 hours delay... and im very optimistic :)
Anyone wanna bet on it ?

For all who think the patch is really good (I also find some good stuff in it), do you wanna bet how dear it will cost us? I will bet on 5 hours delay... and im very optimistic :)
Anyone wanna bet on it ?

+1 Shift-click to overheat

-1 Renaming modules

it happends that patcher breakes sometimes. they'll fix it before server reboot normally

Im sure someone will soon enough come up handy utility to do it automaticly.

[quote=Man'O' War]For all who think the patch is really good (I also find some good stuff in it), do you wanna bet how dear it will cost us? I will bet on 5 hours delay... and im very optimistic :)
Anyone wanna bet on it ?[/quote

4 hours and 40 minutes.

did anyone else patch before 12 and start getting verification failure? ie a bunch of crc mismatchs.

Sister core probe launcher and expanded probe launcher boost to scan probe strength has been increased from 5 to 10%.

In order to simplify the naming system in EVE, the following changes have been made to Weapons & Ammunition: Gùª All EM missiles will now have the name GÇÿMjolnirGÇÖ.
GùªAll Thermal missiles will now have the name GÇÿInfernoGÇÖ.
GùªAll Kinetic missiles will now have the name GÇÿTraumaGÇÖ.
GùªAll Explosive missiles will now have the name GÇÿNovaGÇÖ.

Skirmish Warfare Link GÇô Interdiction Maneuvers II effectiveness has been increased from 3.5 to 3.75%
GÇó Information Warfare Link GÇô Sensor Integrity II effectiveness has been increased from 3.5 to 3.75%
GÇó Information Warfare Link GÇô Electronic Superiority II effectiveness for Remote Sensor Dampeners and Tracking Disruptors has been increased from 1.25 to 1.5%
GÇó Mining Foreman Link GÇô Mining Laser Field Enhancement II effectiveness has been increased from 5 to 5.625%

I have some expirience with CCP, so I put 4 days skill in there. Not that I think CCP can screw it that bad, but you never know :)

How is this the time for request? The time for complaining was long ago. I get it, you are bored and want to post. Or to poast. I can help you. Or maybe not, but I have a question. Why "...."? Does it help?

I suppose people like me need the little dots so that my brain can catch up to the words, or is it some form of elaborate S.O.S.

As far as features go I'm quite keen on being able to log in. Now. *gimlet eyes on CCP* I hope there is someone "shift-clicking" the update people over there in Ice-land/ london or wherever.

Any chance the 'manual patch drop down' will start being updated with the correct patch version earlier. It's only ever come up with the correct version after the server is up. Or am I am I following the wrong links to get this sooner?

What type of date format is that? Why don't you stick to ISO if you have an international game? I really recommend you to check the different standards for calendar dates, for beginners this is sufficient:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_date

All EM missiles will now have the name GÇÿMjolnirGÇÖ.
All Thermal missiles will now have the name GÇÿInfernoGÇÖ.
All Kinetic missiles will now have the name GÇÿTraumaGÇÖ.
All Explosive missiles will now have the name GÇÿNovaGÇÖ.

Collision for Customs offices has been reduced in size.

Added API calls:
* /char/Locations.xml.aspx
* /corp/Locations.xml.aspx
Both calls require a comma separated list of ids.

Fixed information message for lack of powergrid when onlining structures at a starbase.

T2/faction/mining crystals now correctly display their damage-per-use chance.

This +1

Generally, I find most of what these people are saying as simple whining and complaining that the game isn't exaclty the way they want to play it. Although I do agree that POS permissions need to be fine tuned to allow all ranges of control. Everything else looks great to me! Keep up the good work! Next time schedule for a longer down time though, and surprise us by bringing the servers back up earlier! =P

Why??? I have been doing exploration pretty much and 5% they get is enough. How about giving some weight on character skills too yeah?

YAY

Incoming trolls

#1 Posted: 2012.01.23 14:58 | Edited by: CCP Navigator
EVE Online: Crucible 1.1 is scheduled for deployment during an extended downtime on Tuesday, January 24. Downtime will begin at 11:00 UTC and is expected to be completed by 12:00 UTC.

Starting up...(0 sec.)

insanity!

12:55 UTC The server is currently experiencing node issues on start up which has resulted in Tranquility going into an invalid state. We are reviewing the logs and will attempt another start up when the problem is identified and fixed. This will lead for a further delay. We will update with a new eta as soon as possible. Once again, please accept our apologies for this unexpected extended downtime.

I am thrilled that you chose to completely ignore all us silly FW people active in the threads, who for once in a blue moon all agreed that adding alliances at this point (ie. while FW is still broken as hell) was a bad idea.

Next time schedule for a longer down time though, and surprise us by bringing the servers back up earlier! =P

you guys really should stop with those time schedules since i never ever had a single extended downtime that had no extended extended downtime and possible emergency server reboots.

those schedules are more of a gamble anyway :)

Breaks out the pack of cards.......... Anyone for poker?

you guys really should stop with those time schedules since i never ever had a single extended downtime that had no extended extended downtime and possible emergency server reboots.

those schedules are more of a gamble anyway :)

O i like risk can i play can i can i

Damn right you are.

CCP should just write "will take a few hours" or "will take 2-5 hours" and stop embarrassing themselves. Good project managers don't trust estimation of their fellow project members anyway, and estimate times based on previous performance and heuristics. I've some studies at hand but my gut says, nobody wants to read such thing here. ;-)

[quote=taque]


you guys really should stop with those time schedules since i never ever had a single extended downtime that had no extended extended downtime and possible emergency server reboots.

those schedules are more of a gamble anyway :)

oh cmon now its 13:15 get it right and use the test server to try out patches first..thats why you have it isnt it.

ADD MORE EMPIRE, ADD MORE NULL and please give us Jove space access already :P. All this stuff you keep adding and changing is wasting everyones time. This game was at it's best when it felt vast, i've not felt that since the warp to 0km and increase in server traffic :(.
o/

I sure hope all those overloaded pos fuel bays are not the problem. : (
the fix for that will be a hell of a mess.

did anyone else patch before 12 and start getting verification failure? ie a bunch of crc mismatchs.

I sure hope all those overloaded pos fuel bays are not the problem. : (
the fix for that will be a hell of a mess.

check your clock the delay expires in 10 minutes

I can for my life not understand why the do that rollback at the same time as the fuel change. It would have been much safer to just do the fuel change and then do the rollback on the fuel bay size a day or three down the line.

Otherwise it looks like some small but good things. Wolf with 5 lows, gimme!!!!!

I agree and have said it many times we need more space that not hogged by Alliances..... space should be vast and we should not be able to control it all..... wheres the barren lands with no stargates...no stations....like wild west

Where WE have to build it all from scratch

...

check your clock the delay expires in 10 minutes

Wolf with 5 lows, gimme!!!!!

better to delay and make sure its sorted than to release something thats broke

better to delay and make sure its sorted than to release something thats broke

CPP really implemented the MWD Assault Frig role bonus? I don't get it!

12:55 UTC The server is currently experiencing node issues on start up which has resulted in Tranquility going into an invalid state. We are reviewing the logs and will attempt another start up when the problem is identified and fixed. This will lead for a further delay. We will update with a new eta as soon as possible. Once again, please accept our apologies for this unexpected extended downtime.

lmao 13:40 now

Keyword: Wormholes.

lmao 13:40 now