1. Concord will not just destroy your ship but also pod you.

3. Denial of killmail. HI-sec ganking should not give the crminal bragging rights. Deny killmails for all illegal hi-sec ganking.

This and this is what I would love to see.

CONCORD should just pod their ass into oblivion, reduce their SP count even with an updated clone, and shoot them on site at gates while traveling AFK in a pod...cause its a cold harsh universe and they should be reminded of it everytime they drop below -5 that some equilibrium should be maintained. I would pod them myself, but **** if I am to lazy to bother.

Killmails. Gamer's crumple and cry like a little girl when you touch them in the naughty place their score. Implement a buy back system of your killmail, for 2 million isk for each one like a wardec. Guy is bragging to his buds..."Hey check out this hulk kill...*silence over Vent, followed by an explosion of anger* OMFG! THAT NEWB ***** COWARD TOOK IT BACK!!!"

Yeah, will never happen. But would be nice if they did

It funny. Topic like this is get many argue but if so many feel strong for two side it usually are problem.

Yeah, will never happen. But would be nice if they did

This most definitely is a problem

This most definitely is a problem but, I prefer to address problems with the most immersive solutions. So what would we do in real life?

Escorts! The least NPC corps can do for their 11% tax is provide you with a faction navy escort. The size and capabilities of your escorts should depend directly on your standing with the faction, all the way down to -9, and inversely on the security level of the system you're in, all the way out to 0.1 systems. If you commit an offense, you get attacked by your victims escorts as well as your own.

In what way is it a problem?

As for the escorts, they already exist. People just choose not to do them.

What happens when you die?
What do your escorts do?
And what happens when we kill them too?

Too much fun for criminals, not enough fun for victims.

NPC escorts, not player escorts.

"I want NPCs to solve all of my problems for me in the popular single-player game EVE Online"

Why are they needed when a solution already exists?

This most definitely is a problem but, I prefer to address problems with the most immersive solutions. So what would we do in real life?

Escorts! The least NPC corps can do for their 11% tax is provide you with a faction navy escort. The size and capabilities of your escorts should depend directly on your standing with the faction, all the way down to -9, and inversely on the security level of the system you're in, all the way out to 0.1 systems. If you commit an offense, you get attacked by your victims escorts as well as your own.

Pirate corps are not a solution to piracy. That's why:

"I want NPCs to solve all of my problems for me in the popular single-player game EVE Online"

Seems what you're looking for is already in the game. Use the below as necessary.

"long list of t1 and t2 mods for shield, armor, and haul"
(edited for brevity)

tl;dr

None of which help the rookies who fly frigates and destroyers and don't have the skills for t2 modules.

But I expect no less from a player who's avatar looks afflicted with microcephaly.

I respawn in station, buy another ship, and undock with a new escort.
My last escort fights you until they die or destroy your ship.
If you're still there, then you face an increasing number of both
navy and CONCORD ships until your ship pops.

Any more stupid questions, either of you?

Pirate corps are not a solution to piracy. That's why:

If Concord gets involved then it is obviously a criminal act. So I see the differences in system sec as a robber wanting to rob a well protected bank (1.0) versus robing an abandoned house (0.5).

1. No killmail. That is a must.

2. Dropped loot is inaccessible and made available to the victim only. Not to passersby or the criminal's backup.

3. ISK fine equal to victim's insurance payoff imposed on the criminal. Giving him a negative account if he doesn't have it.

These three thing would curb ganking.

That is unless CCP like things the way they are...which means nothing will change and the game will continue to be unbalanced in the name of being "hardcore."

Actually, CCP does like it this way. Otherwise they would've made it so you can't even activate an offensive module in highsec against a player without a wardec.

Then the question remains, does CCP like my sub-money more than their unbalanced "hardcore" game features?

-1 sub

If Concord gets involved then it is obviously a criminal act. So I see the differences in system sec as a robber wanting to rob a well protected bank (1.0) versus robing an abandoned house (0.5).

1. No killmail. That is a must.

2. Dropped loot is inaccessible and made available to the victim only. Not to passersby or the criminal's backup.

3. ISK fine equal to victim's insurance payoff imposed on the criminal. Giving him a negative account if he doesn't have it.

These three thing would curb ganking.

That is unless CCP like things the way they are...which means nothing will change and the game will continue to be unbalanced in the name of being "hardcore."

wow 1 sub CCP is hurting right now

The risk of being suicide ganked is part of high-sec gameplay. Deal with it.

Child, you seem to forget something. CCP is first and foremost a business. There product? Entertainment.

When an element of your customers no longer feel it is entertaining but rather unfairly frustrating due to some internal mechanic which they see as faulty...those customers will walk. Granted all games have their elements of risk, but there is also balance.

Did I mention CCP is first and foremost a bu$ine$$? An unsatisfied customer is a deficit to CCP.

All you barbarians have null and low sec to slaughter each other with. But when you interfere with trading and mining and hauling in Hi-Sec and all Concord does is slap you on the wrist, then the game is not balanced and it ceases to be fun for those that enjoy the more cerebral pursuits of EVE.

Ceases to be fun...and "fun" is what games are all about. For all parties...both pirates and carebears.

As it stands now, EVE is a pirate's game. Everything else about the player run economy and hi-sec and other spreadsheet BS that may attract those that enjoy those aspects of the game is just cosmetic fluff to draw in an unsuspecting crowd. EVE as it stands now is Carebear deficient both in features and support. Pirates however have it pretty good.

Lastly, one big difference between you and me.....I can walk away from something that is broken and spend my money elsewhere. Unlike you who cant.

It's not for the entitlement crowd, and we pay our subs as well, you aren't the only ones keeping CCP going, we've been doing it up until you came into the game and I have a strange feeling we'll keep on doing it after you leave. Don't like the movie? Don't watch it! Don't like the pizza? Don't eat it! Don't like the way the game works? Get a bit pet lip and stamp your feet like a spoiled brat.

CCP even said it themselves in this video, which you may have seen at some point

Working as intended. Ganking fuels industry, which balances the economy.

Next whining carebear.

Well then, perhaps they (CCP) should stop sending out all those "discounted re-sub" emails. Obviously CCP has all of you to keep it afloat. It certainly doesn't need me nor my money. Right?

Perhaps a DEV can chime in and confirm that for me.

If you feel you matter so much, why not contact CCP directly? Keep us posted on the response.

Ganking reduces subs. Working as intended?

If you unsub over some exploded pixels, this game was never meant for you.