EVE Search - What would you use against a Star Destroyer?

All Channels

Ships and Modules

What would you use against a Star Destroyer?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Fity Pence	Posted - 2007.12.16 20:32:00 - [1] So I just finished watching some Star Wars, and this question begs to be asked... Ok, say you had to fight a Star Destroyer, what ship(s)/fit(s) would you use? sig under construction.
UGLYUGLY	Posted - 2007.12.16 20:40:00 - [2] Minmatar ships, they have natural resist to lasers
Thor Xian Vertigo One	Posted - 2007.12.16 20:52:00 - [3] No ship in the verse of Eve could take on any class of Star Destroyer. I think 100+ turrets would swiftly minimize the advantage of Minnie resists.
Vitrael Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2007.12.16 20:58:00 - [4] This is not a star wars forum.
Lacolo Basema Caldari Fortunate Few	Posted - 2007.12.16 20:58:00 - [5] I would agree, no EVE ship short of some of the capital ships would be able to take on a Star Destroyer. Too many fast-tracking turrets.
Jongo Fett Caldari An Eye For An Eye Rule of Three	Posted - 2007.12.16 21:03:00 - [6] Eve ship can never win against star wars ships
Dragos Mrs PROGENITOR CORPORATION Intrepid Crossing	Posted - 2007.12.16 21:05:00 - [7] nanno'd out ships moving 12km and a wtf stealthbomber zerg :D
Jongo Fett Caldari An Eye For An Eye Rule of Three	Posted - 2007.12.16 21:06:00 - [8] google fights proves that star wars beats eve http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Star+Wars&word2=Eve+Online
UGLYUGLY	Posted - 2007.12.16 21:49:00 - [9] Damp it so it's lock range is only 6km
Eiskalt Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2007.12.16 22:02:00 - [10] I¦d use a Vaga and orbit him until he has to logg off, then kill him slowly. No amount of balancing can fix playing like a moron!
lag kills Woopatang The Red Skull	Posted - 2007.12.16 22:09:00 - [11] all you got to do is take out their shield generators then fly a suicide interceptor through their bridge. :] ___________________________ not all who wander are lost.
Pottsey Enheduanni Foundation	Posted - 2007.12.16 22:28:00 - [12] It depends on there tech level. What if those 100 Star Destroyer lasers damage are the equivalent of 1 Civilian laser with lvl 1 skills or worse? I never got the impression Star wars was that high tech! They donÆt have nano tech, or many of the techs we have, Doomsday device would devastate them and things like smartbombs and SB bombs they wouldnÆt have a clue how to deal with. Starwars shields and amour plates donÆt repair them selfÆs during combat as far as I can tell. As for EW well Starwars wouldnÆt stand a chance they would never get a lock let alone fire 1v1. I bet they donÆt have a way to deal with energy drain either. There is a good chance 1 anti 425mm railgun would just knock down the Star wars shields in 1 volley. Going by lore pod pilots would have a massive advantage over Star Destroyers with crew and slow response time. We can do things with our ships and respond to things faster that they cannot even dream off. Passive shield tanking guide click here
Parfait M	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:00:00 - [13] I would obviously use an Amarr frigate and fly it right into the bridge.
mackem Fusion Enterprises Ltd Mostly Harmless	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:09:00 - [14] Now witness the power of this fully armed and operational Erebus?
Lithalnas Amarr Headcrabs	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:19:00 - [15] mobile warp bubble and then a lot of dreads and dampening battleships. And a couple of Warrior II Ishtars to take care of the TIE's. ------------- fixed for greater eve content
Admiral Price	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:22:00 - [16] Ibis, Velator, Impairior, and(minmatar newb ship) can take it on!
Boomhaur Minmatar	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:25:00 - [17] Originally by: Jongo Fett google fights proves that star wars beats eve http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Star+Wars&word2=Eve+Online Unfortunately it also says Hello Kitty and Neopets will kick our ass any day of the week Try it im not lying Definition of Minmatar, former slaves who built ships from duct tape and scraps of rusted metal, who rose up against their master's and emerged victorious. And further proof the Ammar suck.
mill veters	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:26:00 - [18] star destroyer 1600m (1 mile) super star destroyer 8000m (5 miles) 2nd super star destroyer (blue guy) 17,000m (10.6 miles) a titan is around 15000-20000m 15-20km and probably the only ship that could take on one with its doomday weapon.
Admiral Price	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:30:00 - [19] Originally by: Boomhaur Originally by: Jongo Fett google fights proves that star wars beats eve http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Star+Wars&word2=Eve+Online Unfortunately it also says Hello Kitty and Neopets will kick our ass any day of the week Try it im not lying well thta's embarassing but also if you take off the Online part of EVE we get about 195 million finds that beats next to everything!
Shereza	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:32:00 - [20] I'd point out that a star destroyer can take out planets but any ship with live crew and enough bean burritos can probably take out a planet.
Draeca federation navy taskforce	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:32:00 - [21] I'd swarm it with honortanked discobantams.
Laboratus Gallente BGG Atrum Tempestas Foedus	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:37:00 - [22] Oo, this is easy. Star destroyers have 2 critical flaws in their design against smaller ships. So any interceptor or the like. Drive behind the bridge shoot the turrets there, pop the shield gens and it won't be able to fire back. Or drive to the launch port, where it can't shoot and kill it from there. Been there, done that with every ship in x-wing, not a problem, not even difficult... For larger ships, no idea. Propably an EW ship with anti fighter gear. In the end, Imperial Star destroyers are figher carriers able to also deploy significants amounts of infantry and also has quite a bit of firepower... ___ P.S. Post with your main. Mind control and tin hats
Atsuko Ratu Caldari Advanced Logistics	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:37:00 - [23] Torp Raven.
Atsuko Ratu Caldari Advanced Logistics	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:38:00 - [24] Originally by: Admiral Price Originally by: Boomhaur Originally by: Jongo Fett google fights proves that star wars beats eve http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Star+Wars&word2=Eve+Online Unfortunately it also says Hello Kitty and Neopets will kick our ass any day of the week Try it im not lying well thta's embarassing but also if you take off the Online part of EVE we get about 195 million finds that beats next to everything! Try "Mario"
Sphynx Stormlord Gallente Anqara Tech	Posted - 2007.12.16 23:59:00 - [25] People seem to be forgetting that destroyers are fairly close to the low end of the eve ships line. Whereas in star wars, destroyers were prety special, frigates were decent sised, and then there were the small corvettes and fighers. Prety much any eve cruiser would probably kick a star destroyers ass.
Laboratus Gallente BGG Atrum Tempestas Foedus	Posted - 2007.12.17 00:24:00 - [26] Mate, they are about the size of eve battleships with around a hundred laser turrets and the ability to laucnh 6 squads (72) fighters (even though you gotto remember they are basic eggshells, but if you get unlucky they carry tie advanced or some such other nasty versions). 72 fighters, hurt. They can't armor tank though, and they have vulnerable guns and shield gens so that is a definite minus. ___ P.S. Post with your main. Mind control and tin hats
Rastigan Caldari Ars ex Discordia GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.12.17 00:34:00 - [27] If Mark Hamill and a whole bunch of muppets took out the Empire, I think Eve ships wont have that hard of a time ....
Danari Amarr Viper Squad Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.12.17 01:12:00 - [28] Originally by: lag kills all you got to do is take out their shield generators then fly a suicide interceptor through their bridge. :] this
Dracon Zethera	Posted - 2007.12.17 01:19:00 - [29] Some sort of trashy minmatar ship. The star destroyer would have nothing to do but laugh itself to pieces.
Aerin Cloudfayr Extreme Addiction Atrum Tempestas Foedus	Posted - 2007.12.17 02:09:00 - [30] Originally by: Dracon Zethera Some sort of trashy minmatar ship. The star destroyer would have nothing to do but laugh itself to pieces. nothing trashier than a Z-95 :P
UGLYUGLY	Posted - 2007.12.17 02:19:00 - [31] Get someone to get me a warp in into the middle of it, warp a BS or capital inside and watch the deathstar fly towards the planet from the bump. Destroying both the Death star and the bloody Ewoks. Perfect plan
Turbanator Gallente All's Fair in Love and War	Posted - 2007.12.17 02:41:00 - [32] Originally by: Boomhaur Originally by: Jongo Fett google fights proves that star wars beats eve http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Star+Wars&word2=Eve+Online Unfortunately it also says Hello Kitty and Neopets will kick our ass any day of the week Try it im not lying I used to play Neopets WAAAAHHHH
Maeltstome Minmatar D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.12.17 02:44:00 - [33] Originally by: Draeca I'd swarm it with honortanked discobantams. You sir win eve today ------- [12:07] w33Daz: a trained 1 skill fur 24 mins n it took 2 days aff drones lvl 5 [12:07] w33Daz: A WIS LIKE WTF
Lisento Slaven Amarr Lisento and Miscellaneous Elk	Posted - 2007.12.17 03:35:00 - [34] If a rifter is the size of a 747 then how big is a Maelstrom in comparison to a star destroyer? --- Put in space whales!
Ben Booley Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2007.12.17 03:46:00 - [35] Originally by: Lisento Slaven If a rifter is the size of a 747 then how big is a Maelstrom in comparison to a star destroyer? about the same size.
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:01:00 - [36] Edited by: Ni''ka on 17/12/2007 04:08:45 I would bet on EVE ships. They are made to withstand and deal ALOT of damage. All space in ship is used by armor, generators and gun 'feeding' systems. On other hand Star Destroyer: 1) Have troops, 2) Fighters (TIE) 3) Crew. And as for 100 gun, they are extremly close range. They damage ?? I think maybe equal to civilian turrets. So he is actually paper thin. As for TIEs, even if there is 72! of them, they are weaker than small drones. So i say any battleship can take out Star Destroyer. Not even getting his shilds down. Just wipe out TIEs with smart bomb. Scramble him from 20km, and blow to piecies from any BS-sized medium range turrets. The End for Star Wars fans :P And btw, SW don't have something even close to Micro-Warp technology... They are so slooooooow. So i think 1 Amarr ship can wipe out Empire fleet by ramming destroyrs one by one.
Marcus Druallis Quantum Industries Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:06:00 - [37] Originally by: Shereza I'd point out that a star destroyer can take out planets but any ship with live crew and enough bean burritos can probably take out a planet. We could bombard planets with Tachs --
Hami Sa	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:13:00 - [38] America beats sex. Barely.
Illyria Ambri RennTech	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:17:00 - [39] Originally by: Ni'ka I would bet on EVE ships. They are made to withstand and deal ALOT of damage. All space in ship is used by armor, generators and gun 'feeding' systems. On other hand Star Destroyer: 1) Have troops, 2) Fighters (TIE) 3) Crew. And as for 100 gun, they are extremly close range. They damage ?? I think maybe equal to civilian turrets. So he is actually paper thin. As for TIEs, even if there is 72! of them, they are weaker than small drones. So i say any battleship can take out Star Destroyer. Not even getting his shilds down. Just wipe out TIEs with smart bomb. Scramble him from 20km, and blow to piecies from any BS-sized medium range turrets. The End for Star Wars fans :P Not quite.. you seem to make alot of assumptions such as Tie Fighters being weaker then small drones and the range on its guns being less then EVE ranges. Hell tie bombers alone would smack the crap out of eve ships. EVE ships have at most 8 seperate weapons hardpoints Star Distroyers have hundreds of Turbolasers as well as ION cannons. Dont forget.. Imperial Turbolasers are designed for Orbital bombardment... making them much more powerful then eve weapons. Eve can't even handle LOS targeting with its missiles.. much less withstanding weapons capible of planetary bombardment Turbolasers were disigned for use against Capital ships.. not rebel snub fighters. Meaning they are at minamum XL sized guns if not stronger to punch through planetary defense fields (which would be a HELL of alot stronger then any eve shield or armor tank) Star Distroyers can warp to any location they choose.. not limited to 100km from the nearest celestial object. ------------ This is not War... This is pest control - Dalek Sek Here come the Drums!! - The Master Which is worse.. the Carebear or the pirate that whines about them?
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:19:00 - [40] Edited by: Ni''ka on 17/12/2007 04:22:05 Edited by: Ni''ka on 17/12/2007 04:20:06 We spent alot of time trying to explain that EVE ship are not affected by collisions. So we think that all ship are using warp generatons to actually be not in one dimention with all objects is word. Also this explains large caliber of turrets. Ammunition is equiped with anti-warp charges, that disrupt ships fields on collision, dealing damage.
Marcus Druallis Quantum Industries Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:20:00 - [41] Originally by: Illyria Ambri Originally by: Ni'ka I would bet on EVE ships. They are made to withstand and deal ALOT of damage. All space in ship is used by armor, generators and gun 'feeding' systems. On other hand Star Destroyer: 1) Have troops, 2) Fighters (TIE) 3) Crew. And as for 100 gun, they are extremly close range. They damage ?? I think maybe equal to civilian turrets. So he is actually paper thin. As for TIEs, even if there is 72! of them, they are weaker than small drones. So i say any battleship can take out Star Destroyer. Not even getting his shilds down. Just wipe out TIEs with smart bomb. Scramble him from 20km, and blow to piecies from any BS-sized medium range turrets. The End for Star Wars fans :P Not quite.. you seem to make alot of assumptions such as Tie Fighters being weaker then small drones and the range on its guns being less then EVE ranges. Hell tie bombers alone would smack the crap out of eve ships. EVE ships have at most 8 seperate weapons hardpoints Star Distroyers have hundreds of Turbolasers as well as ION cannons. Dont forget.. Imperial Turbolasers are designed for Orbital bombardment... making them much more powerful then eve weapons. Eve can't even handle LOS targeting with its missiles.. much less withstanding weapons capible of planetary bombardment Turbolasers were disigned for use against Capital ships.. not rebel snub fighters. Meaning they are at minamum XL sized guns if not stronger to punch through planetary defense fields (which would be a HELL of alot stronger then any eve shield or armor tank) Star Distroyers can warp to any location they choose.. not limited to 100km from the nearest celestial object. Read EVE lore, they, on numerous occasions, describe Amarr geddons bombarding minmatar planets with Tachyons. --
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:26:00 - [42] Originally by: Illyria Ambri Dont forget.. Imperial Turbolasers are designed for Orbital bombardment... Meaning they are at minamum XL sized guns if not stronger to punch through planetary defense fields. Yes, but they still cannot brake planetary shield generators. So they use troops to disable them...
Deathnail	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:27:00 - [43] '84 Volvo 240 DL wagon > all.
Illyria Ambri RennTech	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:28:00 - [44] Originally by: Marcus Druallis Read EVE lore, they, on numerous occasions, describe Amarr geddons bombarding minmatar planets with Tachyons. Oh, I;ve read them... but I didnt see any mention of those same amarr having to break though minmatar planetary defense shields... maybe I missed that part? Did Amarr bombard a planet from space? Yes according to lore Did that planet have a defense screen? Doubtful.. they are minmatar after all. :P ------------ This is not War... This is pest control - Dalek Sek Here come the Drums!! - The Master Which is worse.. the Carebear or the pirate that whines about them?
Illyria Ambri RennTech	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:29:00 - [45] Originally by: Ni'ka Originally by: Illyria Ambri Dont forget.. Imperial Turbolasers are designed for Orbital bombardment... Meaning they are at minamum XL sized guns if not stronger to punch through planetary defense fields. Yes, but they still cannot brake planetary shield generators. So they use troops to disable them... Yes they can.. they just couldn't break though the generators on Hoth (which is the only planetary bombardment mentioned in the movies) ------------ This is not War... This is pest control - Dalek Sek Here come the Drums!! - The Master Which is worse.. the Carebear or the pirate that whines about them?
Cpt Branko The Bloody Red	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:31:00 - [46] Edited by: Cpt Branko on 17/12/2007 04:32:25 A scorp sitting a good way off jamming the thing, two disco-phoons to take care of the TIEs, and some gank-fit BS to melt it down. Alternatively, 50 Rifters with all sorts of ewar fitted. Rifters!
Hozac	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:32:00 - [47] The Schwartz.
Illyria Ambri RennTech	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:34:00 - [48] Edited by: Illyria Ambri on 17/12/2007 04:34:29 Originally by: Cpt Branko A scorp sitting a good way off jamming the thing, two disco-phoons to take care of the TIEs, and some gank-fit BS to melt it down. Assuming 1 targeting mechinism on the Start Distroyer.. If each battery hardpoint has its own targeting computer which is most likely.. then you would need hundreds of jammers to shutdown an Imp Star duce See Star Wars has another thing eve dosen't... LOS targeting. Eve ships need to have something targeted to shoot at it... Star Wars ships just have to aim their guns in that direction and pull the trigger. ------------ This is not War... This is pest control - Dalek Sek Here come the Drums!! - The Master Which is worse.. the Carebear or the pirate that whines about them?
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:45:00 - [49] Edited by: Ni''ka on 17/12/2007 04:46:41 Edited by: Ni''ka on 17/12/2007 04:45:39 Originally by: Illyria Ambri Star Wars ships just have to aim their guns in that direction and pull the trigger. Ok, if you don't like big ships, we take few assault frigates. They are too small to get hit by main Destroyers weaponary and can buzz around on 2-3km\s speed, and bomb destroyer while having armor \ shields that can withstand most of TIEs damage.
Mortuus Minmatar Viper Squad Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:48:00 - [50] I have a theory. 1 Tempest with 1400mm could stop a Star Destroyer, or Super Star destroyer. Load round the size of small car, fire into bridge of Star Destroyer. You will notice that the shields in Star Wars pretty much fail at stopping solid objects, and are made to deflect/absorb blaster fire (Torpedoes and Missiles and Ships go right through them). So after I have delivered a massive nuclear weapon into its bridge, it will start that sweet chain reaction seen in the movies, since they have no damage control nor redundant systems. All this from beyond its own engagement range. ex-Occassus Republica <3
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.12.17 04:59:00 - [51] Edited by: Ni''ka on 17/12/2007 05:11:56 Yes, and EVE turret-based weapon are made to deal instant damage. Even on a range of 100-200-300km. This is why we neet turret tracking. For warp-tonnel to be pointed on exact damage point. Turbo-lasers, are more like blasters, firing super-heated projectile, not like real lasers, (60 ion cannons on Destroyer for close range) and designed for capital-ships / planetary bombardments, meaning they won't be able to track moving ship on long range. And they don't have tracking computers. They track manually. Like turrets on Millenium Falcon. And as it was shown in Part 3, are mostly stationary, meaning that they do not track target at all. Just shot things in front of it. Turret based weapons are used to shoot smaller ships, so they are alot weaker. Turret based turbo-lasers are only used on Death Star and Imperial Execuror Class. So, +1 for EVE :P
Galcray Gallente Sacred Templars DeStInY.	Posted - 2007.12.17 05:01:00 - [52] pfftt... there tech is from a long time ago in a galaxy far far away...our tech is like, our time, plus like 100000 years. we WINZ _____________ i lolz in ur facez
Illyria Ambri RennTech	Posted - 2007.12.17 05:11:00 - [53] Originally by: Mortuus I have a theory. 1 Tempest with 1400mm could stop a Star Destroyer, or Super Star destroyer. Load round the size of small car, fire into bridge of Star Destroyer. You will notice that the shields in Star Wars pretty much fail at stopping solid objects, and are made to deflect/absorb blaster fire (Torpedoes and Missiles and Ships go right through them). Star Wars uses a combination of Particle and Ray shielding... 1 for energy weapons and 1 for physical weapons.. theory go buhbye. ------------ This is not War... This is pest control - Dalek Sek Here come the Drums!! - The Master Which is worse.. the Carebear or the pirate that whines about them?
Fity Pence	Posted - 2007.12.17 05:16:00 - [54] Well I see one glaring problem... dun dun dun dun da dun dun da dun.... THE FORCE - It's the ultimate EW. How are we supposed to counter it? Do we team up with the rebels, I guess they are kind of like pirates? sig under construction.
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.12.17 05:16:00 - [55] Originally by: Illyria Ambri Star Wars uses a combination of Particle and Ray shielding... 1 for energy weapons and 1 for physical weapons.. And we have warp-tunnel witch accelerate projectile to the speed none SW shield can stop ... 1400 caliber slug just go through shields... And i haven't seen theyre particle shields stoping moving fighters... they just collide with ship...
MyOwnSling Gallente RONA Corporation RONA Alliance	Posted - 2007.12.17 05:28:00 - [56] I would use templars, many many templars (wtf is a templar) ------------- Stop whining. Originally by: Puupuu dude... your face...
Ereman Sarat	Posted - 2007.12.17 05:36:00 - [57] Wipe them out... All of them...
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.12.17 05:37:00 - [58] Edited by: Ni''ka on 17/12/2007 05:37:12 Originally by: Fity Pence Well I see one glaring problem... dun dun dun dun da dun dun da dun.... THE FORCE - It's the ultimate EW. How are we supposed to counter it? Force?? What is Force comparing to the powers that Capsuleer pilot have then they attached to the ship... And yes, we ARE our ships... we feel and see through sensors of our ships. No Forgce can compare to this... Too small on energy scale...
Kldraina	Posted - 2007.12.17 05:42:00 - [59] I am doubtful that a Star Destroyer would do more damage than a Blasterthron. If it doesn't do more damage than a Blasterthron, I can tank it.
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.12.17 05:50:00 - [60] Edited by: Ni''ka on 17/12/2007 05:58:34 Got this info: The Imperial I-class Star Destroyer possessed a main battery of twelve heavy turbolasers and four heavy ion cannons, arranged in eight dual mounts flanking the ship's tower structure. Numerous Expanded Universe sources cite the armament of the Imperial II as consisting of 50 turbolasers, heavy turbolasers or turbolaser batteries, and ion cannons. So we in a position where is no exact info about ships :) Also non-turret mount of "lasers" on Star Destroyer gives him a disavantage, meaning that only part of them can fire at exact direction. Dual-Turret mout on EVE ship gives 360 degree firepower coverage. Actually we have max 16 turret, but taking turret placement on ships hull, only half of them can fire to 1 point. So we have "8" turrets.
Nhoj Sllew Amarr Interstellar eXodus R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.12.17 06:02:00 - [61] you people need to stop playing X-Wing so much, SD's in that were a TAD toned down Linkage I RP EWOK
Illyria Ambri RennTech	Posted - 2007.12.17 07:00:00 - [62] Originally by: Ni'ka Originally by: Illyria Ambri Star Wars uses a combination of Particle and Ray shielding... 1 for energy weapons and 1 for physical weapons.. And we have warp-tunnel witch accelerate projectile to the speed none SW shield can stop ... 1400 caliber slug just go through shields... And i haven't seen theyre particle shields stoping moving fighters... they just collide with ship... Whatchoo talkin 'bout willis? Warp tunnel projectiles for artillery?? what are you smoking and where can I get some? You seem to forget that fast moving fighter made it into the bridge about 10 seconds after one of the star destroyer bridge officers clearly stated "Sir!! we've lost our bridge deflector shield" As for seeing the particle shields.. go count how many tie fighters got bounced into rebel capital ships by the falcon as it was avoiding them... I know of at least one that impacted with the "medical frigate" A nebula B class ship and leave no secondary explosions. ------------ This is not War... This is pest control - Dalek Sek Here come the Drums!! - The Master Which is worse.. the Carebear or the pirate that whines about them?
StarLite Amarr Evolution Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.12.17 07:06:00 - [63] I'd find the big red selfdestruct button and throw a bantam at it. it will self destruct right away :P _______________________________________________________________________ This sig is guarded by SigGuard(c)
goodby4u Logistic Technologies Incorporated	Posted - 2007.12.17 07:12:00 - [64] A couple of huggins to cut its speed down below 1m/sec then have a revelation with 3x therm hardeners 3x em to cover against lasers...
Pottsey Enheduanni Foundation	Posted - 2007.12.17 07:32:00 - [65] Edited by: Pottsey on 17/12/2007 07:33:33 72 fighters, hurt. 1 smartbomb and those 72 fighters without shields or amour reapires all die. If there fighter weapons are based on then technology thatÆs 100Æs if not 1000Æs of years more primitive then our technology. There fighter are so primitive most donÆt even have shields or amour repairers. There main long range weapons seem to be under 2km which hints at how old/low tech they are. Even our drones have more shields and amour defence then there fighters, let alone our fighters V there fighters. ôDont forget.. Imperial Turbolasers are designed for Orbital bombardment... making them much more powerful then eve weapons.ö http://media6.curse-gaming.com/images/small-previews/26010/Eve_WP24_1600.BMP ômuch less withstanding weapons capible of planetary bombardmentö Our weapons are capable of planetary bombardment in fact there are talks single ship destroying hole planets. Remember each projectile is more powerful then a nuke and you often get hit by 7+ at a time. ôpfftt... there tech is from a long time ago in a galaxy far far away...our tech is like, our time, plus like 100000 years.ö Star Wars technology is stagnant it doesnÆt get better over time. ôTHE FORCE - It's the ultimate EW. How are we supposed to counter it?ö A pod pilot with say adv learning has more willpower, perception, faster reaction, more intelligence, better memory then any person with force and we out number people with force. We also come back from the dead. Just think of the moral effect that will have on them. The biggest factor is our sip production. We have a lot of motherships and Titans and build them in a faction of the time Star Wars people do. Any ship with a webber would win. Go to 10km outside there range and use web to keep them outside your range and fit 1 smartbomb. Passive shield tanking guide click here
Phoenicia Black Sea Industries Cult of War	Posted - 2007.12.17 07:38:00 - [66] As numerous and powerful as the lasers on an ISD may be (note that they can blow up 'roids), I can't imagine their range to be impressive, as witnessed by most fleet battles in Star Wars. Therefor, I'd be using a Rokh with a rack of 425's and light drones for TIE defense.
Pottsey Enheduanni Foundation	Posted - 2007.12.17 07:50:00 - [67] Edited by: Pottsey on 17/12/2007 07:50:41 The only reason we cannot blow up roids are due to gameplay reasons. Lore and tech wise we can blow up roids. In fact we can blow up lots at once. Passive shield tanking guide click here
Nybbas Sons of Enelaise Enelaise	Posted - 2007.12.17 08:10:00 - [68] not to mention a "light missile" has the payload of a small nuke...
Terraform Gallente Gemini Sun Knights Of the Southerncross	Posted - 2007.12.17 09:18:00 - [69] So the conclusion to the discussion is: Starwars would be crying if they got attacked by evil EveOnlinecarebearepirates from the future.
Pinky Denmark The Cursed Navy	Posted - 2007.12.17 09:25:00 - [70] Trick it through a proper gate camp and watch the capt'n cry - I'm a nice guy!! But hook me up with some pew pew, because I'm really bored...
Laboratus Gallente BGG Atrum Tempestas Foedus	Posted - 2007.12.17 09:48:00 - [71] I seem to remember turbo lasers had around 10km max range. Another thing to be considered is that SW ships only had shields as defences. They didn't have any ablative armor. That means for example those antimatter rounds hurt when they hit the exposed hull. Well, pretty much everything hurts... ___ P.S. Post with your main. Mind control and tin hats
Alitha Maru Minmatar Hidden Agenda Deep Space Engineering	Posted - 2007.12.17 10:45:00 - [72] Easy. Any ship that can do high EMP damage, after the shields are down the ISD will be disabled. Then it is just a matter of time until it is pounded to a pulp.
Acoco Osiris Gallente Sublime.	Posted - 2007.12.17 11:09:00 - [73] I think what many people are missing is that it's not just turret number, it's turret size. EVE turrets are very big, and will probably push out the damage of several turbolasers. Besides, their current number of guns is based on EVE mechanics, seeing as it would be a bit tough for players to handle 50 turrets at a time. Besides, they've got no defense against Ewar, nor against NOS/neut, not even stasis webs. ------------------- I nerfed my own sig To amuse you, here is my Retriever ever since its first Trinity deployment. RIP. * * * * ** * * * ** * * * * * *** *

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.