EVE Search - Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Har Harrison Amarrian Retribution 138	Posted - 2012.02.08 02:40:00 - [61] - Quote Flyinghotpocket wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: -Send the message that we want more activity in lowsec, but not more blobbing! -Send the message that we culturally disdain the drama that complicates 0.0 warfare! -Send the message that we are not a test bed for nullsec sovereignty improvements! -Send the message that we are not here to be GÇ£co-optedGÇ¥ by nullsec groups! I cant beleive im saying this. You have my vote Haha - FHP is supporting a minnie!!! Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! Vote Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM 7
Lord Azeroth Amarrian Retribution 10	Posted - 2012.02.08 02:55:00 - [62] - Quote Got my vote !
Benilopax The Ashen Lion Syndicate 191	Posted - 2012.02.08 02:57:00 - [63] - Quote Don't forget to like the OP so he gets to the threshold of 100.
Zmaster BloodLust BloodLust Enterprises Apocalypse Now. 0	Posted - 2012.02.08 03:21:00 - [64] - Quote No need to writte a Wall of text... mutch has been said before so... Good luck to you Hans, you got my vote! Regards, Z
Zostrallis KA POW POW Inc Late Night Alliance 3	Posted - 2012.02.08 03:30:00 - [65] - Quote u got my vote Hans, i hope those that dont know you take the time to read your manifesto.
Iestor Sefem Velox 0	Posted - 2012.02.08 03:41:00 - [66] - Quote Hans go for it mate, we need someone to represent us, you got my vote.
Hans Jagerblitzen Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance 975	Posted - 2012.02.08 03:48:00 - [67] - Quote Flyinghotpocket wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: -Send the message that we want more activity in lowsec, but not more blobbing! -Send the message that we culturally disdain the drama that complicates 0.0 warfare! -Send the message that we are not a test bed for nullsec sovereignty improvements! -Send the message that we are not here to be GÇ£co-optedGÇ¥ by nullsec groups! I cant beleive im saying this. You have my vote You have no idea how much this means to me
Deen Wispa Screaming War Eagles Incorporated 116	Posted - 2012.02.08 04:10:00 - [68] - Quote I had a feeling that you would eventually run. The only lingering question was whether you would pigeonhole yourself as a FW delegate or make a wiser move to represent lowsec/hisec space. Your document and platform really shows how much you've thought this through. I have already promoted your link in the Gallente militia channel for more 'likes' . I will also promote you to my own corp. Good luck EDIT: Your document is too wordy and could probably be more succinct and concise. Alot of people will not read through 20 pages. Hopefully you can find someone to cut down the verboseness of the document and help get your message across alot clearer. Apparently, once you create a sig. You can't completely delete it. So this is my sig...for now.
Bob McGenericname Angry Mustellid 7	Posted - 2012.02.08 04:28:00 - [69] - Quote Flyinghotpocket wrote: I cant beleive im saying this. You have my vote I say we form a superpac: Ex Proper Villains for a More Jagerblitzen'd CSM plus, voting for Hans means I get to spite Zero, and what greater purpose is there in life
Flyinghotpocket Amarrian Retribution 33	Posted - 2012.02.08 04:40:00 - [70] - Quote Har Harrison wrote: Flyinghotpocket wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: -Send the message that we want more activity in lowsec, but not more blobbing! -Send the message that we culturally disdain the drama that complicates 0.0 warfare! -Send the message that we are not a test bed for nullsec sovereignty improvements! -Send the message that we are not here to be GÇ£co-optedGÇ¥ by nullsec groups! I cant beleive im saying this. You have my vote Haha - FHP is supporting a minnie!!! i have flown with hans many times, and he is still a minmatar militia member, and i know that his intentions are good. IF i, flyinghotpocket am saying this. the rest of all militia's need to be saying this.

Jhaelee de'Auvrie The Peerage 2	Posted - 2012.02.08 04:42:00 - [71] - Quote I think Hans is one of the few people I would trust to voice FW issues in a non-faction biased fashion. You will have may vote.
Hans Jagerblitzen Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance 978	Posted - 2012.02.08 05:01:00 - [72] - Quote Deen Wispa wrote: EDIT: Your document is too wordy and could probably be more succinct and concise. Alot of people will not read through 20 pages. Hopefully you can find someone to cut down the verboseness of the document and help get your message across alot clearer. No apologies here. I have been unimpressed by the amount of information and opinions offered by the other candidates in the race, and much criticism has rightfully been cast about whether any of us actually stand for anything, or have any proposals we'd like to push through. That, and a lot of people just don't know me. Frankly, I've just chosen to lay it all out there, and let people decide whether to read it or not. The ones that are patient enough to read the document, are the ones really care about the outcome of this race. Readers that simply go "TL:DR" are less likely to follow through with actually voting when the time comes, so I'd rather reach out to the ones that are really invested enough in the race to be studying the candidates carefully this early in the game. There will be certainly time to bulletinize everything in the days to come, but frankly I'm spent after writing that beast and the bloggers will surely do most of the dissecting work for me over the next few days. Whatever they can't distill from my little paper, I'll be happy to spell out more clearly for you all. In the meantime I'm just continuing to quietly build my core network of committed support, and answering the various questions that arise that haven't been covered by my primer. If you're one of the many CEO's, FC's, Directors, or other community leaders that will be supporting my campaign by sending out the call to vote, be sure to get in touch with me or Shalee Lianne ASAP if you haven't already. We'd love to get you on our mailing list for announcements and the like. I'll try to get everyone responded to within 24-48 hours, thank you for your patience with me during this busy time.
Choc talar Praetorian Mining and Planetary Exploitation 0	Posted - 2012.02.08 05:22:00 - [73] - Quote Finally someone who wants to honestly represent the "others". +1 Hans you got my vote!
Joyitii Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.02.08 07:43:00 - [74] - Quote Okay so originally I asked these questions to or rather suggested them to the person who was seeking help on what people of highsec may want. I never received a response from him despite spending a fair amount of time before reading up on the issues and condensing them down enough to not be such a headache to read. So anyway without further ado here is some edited copy pasta to see what you think about them. Personally I think that industry really needs a great big revamp, specifically the mining side of industry. To summarize a thread post that I was reading not too long ago it talks about how to improve mining to the point in which it could potentially be enjoyable and require skill to do properly. The ways in which to make mining more GÇ£funGÇ¥ also increase the difficulty of making a botting program that does everything on its own. Some of the things in this forum post include: Visual differentiation of asteroids up close in order to see a better yield, system wide belts (finally), Much larger difference in yields of ore essentially giving more use to the survey scanner along with the visual cues to show the difference (i.e. Instead of having there be 2 better yields of 5% per ore instead have 5%, 50%, 100%, 200%, etc.), remove drone mineral drops and replace them with higher bounties, remove t1 drops and instead have rats drop bpcGÇÖs (This one IGÇÖm unsure about but itGÇÖs mostly going towards only allowing players to acquire minerals through mining), and finally having probing mechanics assist you in finding this higher yield ore. Those are just some of the things mentioned within the thread that I believe have some merrit. The thread can be found here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=672496#post672496 Also anyone who considers the mining system in ME2 to be anywhere near "good" seriously needs to reconsider what you find fun and worth your time. The second suggestion that I mentioned was the removal of "tiers" and instead having roles instead for each type of ship in Eve. There are a fair amount of T1 ships all across the board that are never used because there are just direct upgrades to them. This should be fixed and can be done by adjusting the ships into their own specific roles. There honestly isn't much more to say on the issue and in my original post suggesting this I started to ramble. So anyway here is the thread post, however it does take a fair amount of reading compared to the other one to find some of the better posts in it. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=24582 Anyway those are the two biggest things that I would like to know out of pretty much all of the candidates, you seem like one of the more likely ones that may win running partially for highsec.
DeBingJos T.R.I.A.D 194	Posted - 2012.02.08 07:51:00 - [75] - Quote You have my vote. Fix FW !
Venus Rinah Paladin Philanthropists 42	Posted - 2012.02.08 07:54:00 - [76] - Quote Likewise the manifesto or details you have surrounding your intentions for improving the game I find appealing and well balanced. But like the comment above, as much as moving roids might add some fun, i don't think it will remove botting, they'll simply compensate, more importantIy I would want to see supported views of making mining a more "competive" role in EvE so as to be better recognised as a more valid activity which would sway a number of industrial types like myself much more strongly in favour of the candidacy.
ceyriot Amarrian Retribution 0	Posted - 2012.02.08 07:55:00 - [77] - Quote Joyitii wrote: Also anyone who considers the mining system in ME2 to be anywhere near "good" seriously needs to reconsider what you find fun and worth your time. Wasn't saying it was good, just wanted to say that it is something that could be done, relatively easily. (I think) Also, it would add more variation to the long-stagnant process of mining.
Joyitii Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.02.08 07:57:00 - [78] - Quote ceyriot wrote: Joyitii wrote: Also anyone who considers the mining system in ME2 to be anywhere near "good" seriously needs to reconsider what you find fun and worth your time. Wasn't saying it was good, just wanted to say that it is something that could be done, relatively easily. (I think) Also, it would add more variation to the long-stagnant process of mining. I suppose you have me there but I've forever had a gripe with how terrible that system was for mining. At least unlock how fast you can spin the damn planet. : /
thoth rothschild Mercenaries UNLiMiTED Double Tap. 63	Posted - 2012.02.08 08:31:00 - [79] - Quote as it seems all the csm candidates try very very hard to kill all the empire pvp and empire wardec system. Ask yourself the question why 70% of players are highsec and why 30% of them are pvp vets. This is the last pvp resort for many old vets who no longer have the time to play 24/7.
Gianiss Dee Monty Pythons Flying Spaceships 2	Posted - 2012.02.08 08:35:00 - [80] - Quote +1 Hans. Glad to see someone knows there is more to Eve than 0.0.

Nicolo da'Vicenza Divine Power. Cascade Imminent 331	Posted - 2012.02.08 09:01:00 - [81] - Quote Quote: If you enlist in a player corp in EvE, I believe you should vulnerable to a war declaration. There isn't much to debate here, its always how its been, and always how it will be. I believe players that can't stomach being wardecced should have the option to choose the NPC corp of their choice (for role play reasons) though the price of security should be a noticeable tax rate (CONCORD security ain't cheap). So you can still haul, mine and trade all you want through NPC corp alts and enjoy a significant advantage over those who don't, you just can't rat as efficiently? Although I'm glad you recognize this as a problem, I'm disappointed that for whatever reason you can't accept that the only solution with substance behind it is simply cutting the cord and doing away with NPC corps entirely (the perma-CONCORD kind, not the faction warfare casual-PvP kind). But for the record, I do support your platform's general sentiment that CCP should stop kowtowing to the threat of losing carebear subs and actually fix the exploits that they are currently running riot with much to the detriment of the rest of the game.
Tiberius Murderhorne Amarrian Retribution 1	Posted - 2012.02.08 09:28:00 - [82] - Quote As Per my Evemail you 100% have the support of both of my accounts. Cheers Tib CCP Fix Faction War!! - Soo much potential! sooo much awesome! Sort it!
Ciar Meara Virtus Vindice 515	Posted - 2012.02.08 11:59:00 - [83] - Quote Interesting, I'll read your platform with great care! (even though your a dirty minmatar) - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow]
Ron Mexxico Origin. Black Legion. 6	Posted - 2012.02.08 12:58:00 - [84] - Quote sup hans hans a p good man
Cearain Imperial Outlaws 247	Posted - 2012.02.08 13:23:00 - [85] - Quote Tsubutai wrote: You wrote a 20 page pdf with, like, 50 references to the mittani. Uh..... wow. Has anyone on csm 6 differentiated themselves from the mittani on any low sec issue? When it comes to low sec the mittani= csm6. And when it comes to low sec mittani has been fairly straight forward in saying he had nothing to offer. Since Mynxee was chair did anyone do anything for low sec? All of her momentum that she built for low sec and all of the work she did to try to get things going has been squandered on csm6. Hans is the person who has demonstrated he will pick up that thread and work with the low sec community just like he has with the fw community. If anything I know about tuskers is true, then Hans should get your vote. You may not like certain particular ideas (for example I think the gcc should be 3 minutes not 10) but the overall goals like this: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: -Send the message that we want more activity in lowsec, but not more blobbing! -Send the message that we culturally disdain the drama that complicates 0.0 warfare! -Send the message that we are not a test bed for nullsec sovereignty improvements! -Send the message that we are not here to be GÇ£co-optedGÇ¥ by nullsec groups! are hard to refute. Hans has researched the community and found the ideas that players want. ThatGÇÖs what mynxee was all about too. I mean if hans is going to be asked to go to a csm summit and the only thing dealing with low sec is FW will be crammed in with a bunch of other GÇ£little thingsGÇ¥ he will do something about it. Mynxee and csm 5 was pretty clearly told by ccp that they werenGÇÖt going to work on low sec or fw for 18 months. CSM5 and mynxee said well I think that is a horrible idea but eventurally determined that nothing they could do at that time would change ccp. So they just put that in the minutes and basically said good luck to the game. Many on the csm 5 saw the game was heading down a crap path so pretty much unsubbed. The players didnGÇÖt see it so clearly although there was some uproar at those minutes. However after several crap expansions what they predicted came true. Eve languished and players unsubbed. Now Mittani claims I am a GÇ£screecher.GÇ¥ Yet if we are to do some GÇ£realtalkGÇ¥ we will see that not only was failing to listen to csm 5 bad for the players it was bad for ccp. It was not until the situation became so dire that they had to layoff 20% of their staff worldwide before they finally realized they canGÇÖt just let eve sit. http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/10/19/ccp-layoffs-affect-20-of-worldwide-staff-company-focusing-on-e/ Now just before this time Mittani was writing articles GÇ£in defense of incarna.GÇ¥ Why was he defending the worst expansion ever? Politics. If he scratches ccpGÇÖs back they will play up csm and make him look good. And that happened. Look at how happy csm and ccp were with eachother early on. CSM even played damage control at the emergency summit. Look at the meetings with mittens and ccp employees on youtube trying to reassure player the game isnGÇÖt going to ****. In exchange CCP was all happy to claim csm has done all sorts of wonderful things. The circle jerk they had going on alienated allot of players from both csm and ccp. It wasnGÇÖt until these bad decisions (that csm5 decried back in june 2010) took such a hold on ccpGÇÖs financials that no one could deny the stupidity any longer, that mittens finally admitted that ccp needs to work on EVE. When was that goonion address? Sept or October of 2011?? ThatGÇÖs over a year after csm 5 already called that one. Well better late than never. But really we donGÇÖt need politicians like that. And sadly no one in csm 6 ever stepped outside of mittenGÇÖs lockstep. We need people who like mynxee will listen to the players and if ccp chooses to ignore them will let the players know that in no uncertain terms. This is the best for the players and the best for ccp. IGÇÖm not saying Hans has done as much for eve as mynxee has but he is a newer player, than she is, and has already demonstrated he is willing to do that sort of work GÇô if he is given the chance. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
M'nu Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance 2	Posted - 2012.02.08 13:27:00 - [86] - Quote +1 You have my rifter. Would just like to note, that even tho from opposing sides of the warzone, we have united together (til the battle was complete) to fight a greater enemy before. Then it was pirates, now its CSM. The combined might of faction warriors makes their women wet in anticipation and their men feel woefully inadequate. Free Hans jobs for errybody.
Mullokad Iwaira Perkone Caldari State 1	Posted - 2012.02.08 13:29:00 - [87] - Quote +1 Jagerbomb has my vote!
Benny Ohu The Lazy Dragoons True Apathy 0	Posted - 2012.02.08 13:36:00 - [88] - Quote Hans seems all right. +1 given. I don't mind CSM6, they've done very well, but having people familiar with different parts of the game on the CSM is ideal, and you have a good head on your shoulders. Also you have this fancypants PDF :O You mention you don't like micro-transactions in this thread, saying few people would want to spend money on ship skins and all that, and suggesting they be bought through in-game means. Now pay attention, because I'm about to make an assumption without knowing any of the applicable data. :D I don't think many people are paying IRL money for vanity items at the moment? I think Player One buys a PLEX for twenty bucks because they want a few million ISK, then some Big Shot with too much ISK for his own good buys a PLEX on the market to convert to AUR. Player One gets their ISK and Big Shot gets their SW33T!1 GOGGLES with ISK they earned in-game. You may not see monocles and codpieces being sold directly through the market just because all clothing trading is being done via PLEX. The whole PLEX thing makes EVE's microtransaction thing a lot different to any other game. I'd be interested in hearing if people are getting their AUR from USD or ISK. Uh, I think I had a point in there somewhere, and it was related to the CSM in some way. Whatever, I'll probably be voting for you. :) Lastly, this is an interesting link. Note the datestamp. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Bountyhunting_Improvements_(CSM) P.S. I remembered to CTRL+C my reply.
uredo ZERO HEAVY INDUSTRIES 3	Posted - 2012.02.08 13:46:00 - [89] - Quote Looks like he breached the 100 'likes' barrier, so will be on the voting list. Nice one.
Sui'Djin Black Rise Guerilla Forces 0	Posted - 2012.02.08 14:56:00 - [90] - Quote +1 greatly appreciated, vote for Hans !



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.