| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Parrette Perot
Eight Drake Limited
1
   |
Posted - 2012.02.09 00:58:00 -
[151] - Quote
As an original Eve Online beta player... that didn't play again until 2011 (and thus missed out on the long long evolution into the current state) , your attitude and ideas make sense to me judged from what the game was supposed to achieve.
So sure I'll vote for ya! |
Galatica789
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 01:54:00 -
[152] - Quote
Have my vote (s) |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
1095
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 02:58:00 -
[153] - Quote
ceyriot wrote:Yeah, nice work. I'm impressed, and certainly will be voting for you!
Also, have ever played Mass Effect, with their resource extractor? It's more of finding the big patch on a planet and mining it instead of just pointing at a planet and going.
Conceptually, I love the idea. Mining could be more fun like this. I would certainly be bored less!
I'm much more pragmatic though, I think we've all learned the lesson following Incarna that ambitious additions to the game run the risk of getting bogged down developmentally.
Something like this would require a huge amount of art team work, UI, balancing, and would dramatically affect the economy if it even slightly changed the average minerals / hour that miners can make in a given area of space.
I'd file this into a category of "once everything else that's simpler gets caught up" and see if there's more achievable solutions to the miner-boredom problem.
You'll soon see that this is my thought process when discussing "what if" features. I think the programming feasability of a solution must be a criteria when evaluating whether its worth promoting, because every commitment to building new code from scratch (which this would require) eats up a higher proportion of resources than adjustments to existing systems, and so those types of projects must be selected very judiciously and be of utmost importance.
That's not at all to say mining wouldn't be worth it, I'm just saying that there are a lot of areas of space to consider - and I don't want future expansions to be released such that some players continually feel left out. Every expansion should have a little something for everyone, even if a big push is made on one project in particular.
With so much backlogged work to complete on so many critical game play mechanics, I think CCP should save themselves time and effort by making adjustments whenever possible (like with Faction Warfare, for example) and not overly complicate an overhaul if they could use those artists and programmers on something that DOES need totally new stuff drawn up (Dead Horse POS or 0.0 Sovereignty).
I really hope they are getting this message in time, and get in touch with the community, before they trudge forward into another Incarna debacle where go way overboard trying to give the players something they weren't really asking for.
|
Poetic Stanziel
Arrakis Technology
724
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 03:01:00 -
[154] - Quote
I support Hans Jagerblitzen has the high-sec candidate of choice for CSM7.
The STAIN Travel Bookmark Collection - 451 Bookmarks |
Lord Kazuhiro
Yuengling Technologies
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 03:09:00 -
[155] - Quote
First real candidate I've liked running for CSM. You have all 14 of my votes sir.  |
Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
252
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 03:12:00 -
[156] - Quote
VCBee 2fast2furious wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:I would just like to say this is a good post. I support what Cearain says here and I do believe that CSM 7 needs a break with the style of CSM 6. . Perhaps they could take a leaf out of CSM 1's book and spend their entire term squabbling like 4 year olds and achieving nothing of any substance whatsoever?
Is someone from CSM 1 running for CSM 7?
If not then arguing about what CSM1 did or didn't do is completely irrelevant to the question whether hans should get your vote for csm 7 - and therefore this thread.
But then again, you probably knew that. You just wanted to divert attention from mittani and company on csm 6, didn't you?
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
Abyss Azizora
Yuengling Technologies
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 03:18:00 -
[157] - Quote
Got my vote as well. We badly need an advocate for Faction Warfare.
Edit: Hey Lord, seems we have the candidate in mind.  |
Seyveaux Cheval
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
20
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 03:30:00 -
[158] - Quote
i dont like this guy dont vote for him |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
1098
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 03:39:00 -
[159] - Quote
Xorv wrote:Read your platform Hans, you're very passionate about EVE and will be a great representative for the existing FW crowd and other current Low sec residents. However, I'm not part of that constituency, and actually really liked what Selene had to say about NPC interaction, and was less than thrilled by your hostility to EVE's real Piracy (for profit PvP) in your platform.
I have no qualms about piracy for profit at all. That's the point right? Someone's gonna shank one of my clones for saying this, but pirate corps tend to be more experienced and professional than Faction Warfare corps. If you don't pwn, you don't eat. There is a point to having a blob, because you need an efficient loot haul to make up for the fact you're not missioning.
It's a working-class form of PvP I myself am too lazy for, but it makes for stronger and more talented pilots in the long run, so I have a strong respect for pirate pilots. I myself am pretty impatient with low sec PvP frequency at the moment. I'm not into "duck-hunting" style PvP, so if there isn't action around, I do my carebear stuff instead. With highsec piracy, there's a lot of stalking involved for a quick kill, and that also just doesn't jive with my attention span. The drawback is that I'm not as good at PvP as others of you that do this day after day. Many pilots younger than I are the true "hot shots" in my corp, cause they sit out there and work for it.
This impatience, of course, is my most selfish motivation for this campaign. I don't remember if I mentioned it in my document or not, but I have ADHD, and am comfortable sharing that. I just want to log on and shoot players, not NPC's, and I don't want to have to sit an hour in space to do that. There's a lot of filler activities in EvE that I use to pass the time between fleet ops and keep it fun (cooking up boosters, for example).
I'm not hostile to piracy at all as a concept, I just think it should be most challenging the deeper you go into highsec. That's the point of "sec", right? I think there's balancing work to be done, because there needs to be areas of space that cater to those of different tastes. I don't know if it came off clear enough in the document, but I'm fine with some areas of highsec being a little more pirate-friendly, if we had shifts in others to make it less of a headache for newer players.
Piracy should be possible in every area of space. If you are in a spaceship in space, any other spaceship should be allowed to lock and kill you. Anywhere. Without exception. I have no problem taking a firm campaign stance on this.
But there should be consequences. And tough ones, in the highest security areas. If you want to do the kind of PvP you'll be called a griefer for, you should be ones most challenged by the mechanics.
I won't pretend to know all the answers yet, there's a lot of good ideas being tossed around. At this point, its easiest to share my core principles, because those are not as subject to change as my advocacy of one particular change or another regarding CONCORD or Crimewatch. |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
1098
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 03:42:00 -
[160] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:I support Hans Jagerblitzen has the high-sec candidate of choice for CSM7.
I am honored. Thank you!
Seyveaux Cheval wrote:i dont like this guy dont vote for him
Well, at least you guys are predictable. I'll give you that. |
|
|
Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Retribution
35
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 04:31:00 -
[161] - Quote
Hiw Freecrest wrote:all for you, i don't want to play evegoon
i thought this was minmatar online? (meaning ships) |
Harrigan VonStudly
The Generic Pirate Corporation
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 04:59:00 -
[162] - Quote
I like your fire Hans. As you state in your blog though: "I have no problem admitting I'm feeling pretty spent despite this being my very first blog entry. It's been nerve-wracking and taken an incredible amount of my free time and emotional energy."
If you are going to run against the likes of Mittens, and you are, as well as, should you win a seat on this CSM yet find yourself petered out already then I fear you are already a lost cause.
Succumbing to the pressure and work load, and this is just the very beginning mind you, shows that you are a premature ejaculator. If you wish to garner my three votes you need to show that you can hold out longer for more than just the first kiss. |
Marlakh
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
Sanctuary Pact
58
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 05:03:00 -
[163] - Quote
As an Ammatar / Amarrian loyalist who left service in FW disgusted with its present state of affairs, you have my two votes.
I like your ideas, your systematic approach to harnessing others' feedback to provide solutions to FW and high/low sec issues, and your passion that clearly shows through. That, and our common experience with the games you played, makes me think you'll best represent my take on what needs to be improved.
Good luck and success for your campaign, honored foe! :)
|
Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
492
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 05:03:00 -
[164] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Seyveaux Cheval wrote:i dont like this guy dont vote for him Well, at least you guys are predictable. I'll give you that.
Everyone else in this thread is also a Goon alt
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |
Mfume Apocal
Origin.
Black Legion.
289
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 05:32:00 -
[165] - Quote
hey are you really german? |
Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
53
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 06:41:00 -
[166] - Quote
Harrigan VonStudly wrote:I like your fire Hans. As you state in your blog though: "I have no problem admitting I'm feeling pretty spent despite this being my very first blog entry. It's been nerve-wracking and taken an incredible amount of my free time and emotional energy."
If you are going to run against the likes of Mittens, and you are, as well as, should you win a seat on this CSM yet find yourself petered out already then I fear you are already a lost cause.
Succumbing to the pressure and work load, and this is just the very beginning mind you, shows that you are a premature ejaculator. If you wish to garner my three votes you need to show that you can hold out longer for more than just the first kiss.
I won't pretend to speak for Hans, but he has been unofficially campaigning for the past year: rallying the FW community, networking with empire dwellers about what needs to be fixed, talking to CSM6 about how to fix FW and Lowsec, etc.
I think by that statement you quoted there, he was simply saying he was going to take a few days to see the responses to his Campaign announcement and use that time to assess the situation, figure out what issues he still needs to address, etc etc.
I know Hans and by no means is writing a document and single blog-post going to "tire him out" after seeing him manage threadnaughts on the forums, diplomatic crises within the militia, network with the thousands if cliques that make up the FW community and, perhaps most incredibly, deal with his boorish and asinine corpmates every day. <3 |
Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
141
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 06:53:00 -
[167] - Quote
Harrigan VonStudly wrote:I like your fire Hans. As you state in your blog though: "I have no problem admitting I'm feeling pretty spent despite this being my very first blog entry. It's been nerve-wracking and taken an incredible amount of my free time and emotional energy."
If you are going to run against the likes of Mittens, and you are, as well as, should you win a seat on this CSM yet find yourself petered out already then I fear you are already a lost cause.
Succumbing to the pressure and work load, and this is just the very beginning mind you, shows that you are a premature ejaculator. If you wish to garner my three votes you need to show that you can hold out longer for more than just the first kiss.
He has been posting on the forums with myself trying to put a fire up CCP's backside ever since they missed the FW round table last year.
In addition, he has put time and effort into touching base with people in FW, high sec and even the low sec pirates and sounding them out. Combine this with the time it takes to put together a document of the size and detail that his campaign brief contains, and you have to understand, this does take some doing. I think many people will admit this is not a sprint. Hans is in it for the long haul. Just give him the time to assess the reaction to his campaign launch. Whilst many have only started their campaign in the last few days, unofficially Hans has been doing it since last year.
Mfume Apocal wrote:hey are you really german?
I believe he is actually from the North America in real life (trying to remember if US or Canada). I was asking the same thing the other day...
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
Vote Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM 7 |
Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
54
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 07:06:00 -
[168] - Quote
Har Harrison wrote:Mfume Apocal wrote:hey are you really german? I believe he is actually from the North America in real life (trying to remember if US or Canada). I was asking the same thing the other day...
He is American. |
Angelus Ryan
Black Lotus Heavy Industries
Ethereal Dawn
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 07:45:00 -
[169] - Quote
Andrea Griffin wrote:It's nice to see a candidate focused on issues of high-sec and low-sec, instead of the meta-gaming of nullsec.
One little nit-picky thing though: Removal of sentry guns at gates in lowsec will ensure a decrease in the population of lowsec. When not even frigates can travel with a modicum of safety from gate to gate, you'll inhibit mobility and make the place even more scary for high-sec residents.
If you want to encourage more population in lowsec, making travel far more dangerous is not the way to do it.
First of all, a disclaimer: I am terribad in PvP and I am not a FW pilot. I am an occasional solo and very small gang (2-4 ships) PvP pilot who flies small ships. But, I do have an opinion and a vote, and I want to get what I vote for.
Hans, please note the quoted "little" nitpick. After reading all 20 pages of your manifesto, this was the only thing that stood out to me as not being a good idea.
Actually, I don't mind the removal of sentries to allow frigate furballs on gates/stations - This is a good thing. It is the insta-frig-locking gang on the gate which theoretically ruins the fun for me (currently you need far more effort to nab a frig on a gate, providing a small amount of safety for a frig scout going around). I vehemently oppose any sort of mechanic where it is not possible to avoid being killed, regardless of what you do, and which (at the very least) does not come with great(er) material cost. Getting outsmarted and outpiloted is one thing, but if even a frigate scout (and no, you shouldn't have to fly a covops just to take a peek next door. If this will be the case, then what will draw new players and casual non-FW PvPers? What will become of the solo pilot?) cannot move around freely enough to let you know what is out there, then we have a problem.
So if we do away with the sentries, we need something to avoid the frig pilot getting shafted. Maybe something like having the jump cloak drop 2 seconds after we start moving? You can still catch a frig if you really want to (but it is possible to make a frig that will align faster than this, which is not necessarily bad as it does take some effort). Gatecamps still work on anything bigger and frigs can now fight on gates/stations. I see a win-win here.
So, while I like your manifesto and I am quite prepared to vote for you: Before I commit my vote to you, I would like your input on this. |
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
www.shipsofeve.com
225
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 08:40:00 -
[170] - Quote
Well written and I must admit that it not only caused my chest to swell but also to make me feel a little guilty ;)
Sadly my votes are all for Meissa but I wish you luck.
Regards,
T'amber
|
|
|
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
1113
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 09:05:00 -
[171] - Quote
Harrigan VonStudly wrote:I like your fire Hans. As you state in your blog though: "I have no problem admitting I'm feeling pretty spent despite this being my very first blog entry. It's been nerve-wracking and taken an incredible amount of my free time and emotional energy."
If you are going to run against the likes of Mittens, and you are, as well as, should you win a seat on this CSM yet find yourself petered out already then I fear you are already a lost cause.
Succumbing to the pressure and work load, and this is just the very beginning mind you, shows that you are a premature ejaculator. If you wish to garner my three votes you need to show that you can hold out longer for more than just the first kiss.
I assure you I have plenty of stamina.
Turns out I had more time to myself to keep up with people than I thought I would. Hence, my postings.
It wasn't as much about what I can handle, I was just warning the community that if I'm slow to respond, assume that I'm away taking care of my family and job, which I don't consider "succumbing to the pressure and work load". That's just me doing what I need to do. I won't apologize for that, but I am happy to explain it at least. Cause its true.
Have faith! We've only just begun, I'm not going anywhere.... |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
1113
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 09:18:00 -
[172] - Quote
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Well written and I must admit that it not only caused my chest to swell but also to make me feel a little guilty ;)
Sadly my votes are all for Meissa but I wish you luck.
Regards,
T'amber
No hard feelings! I want people to vote for who they believe in. |
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
Sanctuary Pact
391
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 09:42:00 -
[173] - Quote
Greetings Hans Jagerblitzen,
I have spent some time reading through some of the other potential CSM 7 candidate threads and have not been convinced or impressed in any way by most of their statements (or lack of). The only thread which I considered decent was by Malcanis on his Manifesto for highsec. He has however stated that he is not running for a CSM seat.
I am edging towards perhaps voting for you, Hans. I just have one question to ask you, if you do not mind.
I know you have read Malcanis' Manifesto on Highsec.
What is your take on it, summarised in a single paragraph ?
I know, it's asking you to put it all very simplistically, it is afterall a well-defined and descriptive Manifesto.
Thank you. o/
The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another. - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 10:19:00 -
[174] - Quote
o7
After reading through the applications of the other serious candidates I come to the conclusion that low sec and it-¦s residents would be represented pretty well by You...
You got my Vote |
ceyriot
Amarrian Retribution
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 10:21:00 -
[175] - Quote
I think another cool addition would be a bar like incursion so you know the state of the system and much is needed to be secured. |
Deathwing Malevolent
Energy Core 2
V.I.R.A.L.
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 11:03:00 -
[176] - Quote
+1
I approve |
Veriscolor
Laurentson INC
StructureDamage
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 11:23:00 -
[177] - Quote
As a fairly inexperienced player, I am impressed with the issues that you have prioritised, in particular the creation of a distinction between 'weekend warriors' and 'career criminals' in order to allow for casual players who may be interested in PvP, such as myself, to engage in some fun killing of others in a space which facilitates such activities, and not have to worry so much about returning to my hi-sec home.
This is the most sober and leveled platform I've seen so far, and I would e happy to give you my vote based on what I have seen here. |
Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
142
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 11:52:00 -
[178] - Quote
I thought this was interesting
http://www.evenews24.com/2012/02/08/freebooted-csm7-elections-the-call-of-the-wild/
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!!
Vote Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM 7 |
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
523
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 12:24:00 -
[179] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:
I like your determination and apparent commitment to the game. And to be honest, Mitten's encouragement of your candidacy is a plus in your favor. You don't have to like the guy's play style to respect his intellect and knowledge of both people and the game.
Anyway, to that end, what I worry about is your determination to be anti-Mittens, anti-Seleene, anti-Trebor... etc. If you're so set against their opinions and play-styles, why should I trust that you'll work as a productive member on CSM7 rather than being the thorn in their side that you keep seeming to portray yourself as? Let's face it, they've got a lot more experience with EvE than you do, and their opinions might come from more experience than you think.
Even though some of your ideas are pretty far out there, as the pro-FW, pro-lowsec guy, you'd probably have my vote. But you're trying awfully hard to distance yourself from some others that will likely be on the CSM, and I'd much rather see a group that can work together than see it devolve into a contentious mess.
So my questions are thus...
When other members of CSM7 that play the game in discord with your world views on what is the right way to pvp disagree with your ideas about changes to high sec or lowsec rules and have alternate ideas, how will you react? And when it comes time to discuss sov warfare and super-cap re-balancing, will you have any more useful input than the naive "remove supers" response?
Reposting my questions and waiting patiently.
This is my signature.-á There are many others like it, but this one is mine. |
Nagarythe Tinurandir
Catholic School for Boys
EXPLO. KINETIK und ein wenig THERMAL
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 13:24:00 -
[180] - Quote
first of all, nice platform hans, i like it. mostly. but it has earned you my like so far and i'm inclined to give you my vote too.
its good to see someone has the will do represent "us" properly.
i can judge anything concerning fw, because i never took part in it.
but changes in the security of high and low sec got my attention. -> after some "fleshing out" definitely worth a shot.
to be honest i'd like to get my hands dirty in low sec in some fun fights, but it is quite easy to loose the permission to enter high sec again after some little "brawlings" and since im living on stuff taking place in high sec, this is kind of a barrier.
your threshold of sec standing loss (maybe put it around -1 or something?) - as long as you keep it civil, eg only shooting ships and no pods, only be "bad" while in low sec, or to some degree lower high sec - would make low sec quite appealing to me^^
though i guess will die horribly the first times...
i also welcomed your thoughts about making mining (or industry for that matter) more interessting and dynamic.
while wildly moving roids sound like fun,but it will only be fun for bigger mining fleets with a logistic support ( means at least to accounts) and make it more difficult for the solitary miner who has to rely on can mining. not every one wants to have to accounts for mining and you can not always expect to have an orca corpmate around. the have rl's too .. ^^
but adding more variety to ore yields or having barren roids mixed in, tweak mining mechanics (ice mining.... b+ñ+ñh) and the often asked for "real" belts, which make a full circles around planets (could be managed on a "roids per grid" base)
sure would spicing it up and encourage more moving around. (but so far no completly new ideas.. ^^)
i have one question:
whats your position to the new balancing efforts which started with crucible. do you see them finished or are you going to urge ccp to go deeper into that topic? do you see the 4 races as on par?
and, as i hope some constructive input:
i think you should communicate, that you have something to offer for the "0.0 bloc" too. (if you really do that means)
i see no reason why 0.0 and empire could not be developed in parallel and still develop individually.
Once they have the hands full maintaining and expanding their little states, they will have less time argueing empire should become like 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |