Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1055
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:23:00 -
[91] - Quote
Gypsio III wrote:I think Liang is about to introduce you to Null. I haven't used a Null Talos, but ten seconds in EFT gives 16/29 km and just under 900 DPS. Does look a bit flimsy though. 
Yes, Null is pretty pimp and is the default ammo in my Talos. Also confirming the Talos is very flimsy: - https://vimeo.com/34665420 - https://vimeo.com/35131824 - https://vimeo.com/35642474 - https://vimeo.com/38352770

-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
102
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:24:00 -
[92] - Quote
Gypsio III wrote:Onictus wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:I too believe that the Talos is slow and must be at 3km to deal damage.
-Liang No, its faster than an oracle, but it doesn't have the power past 30km, and if it does its a shield "tank" which is laughable on the scale of a 3 SeBo Tornado. Its great under 5 people, but that is about it. I think Liang is about to introduce you to Null. I haven't used a Null Talos, but ten seconds in EFT gives 16/29 km and just under 900 DPS. Does look a bit flimsy though. 
Yeah scorch, gives you 55+10 or something silly like that, and an oracle CAN fit a 1600mm plate and big pulses. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1055
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:26:00 -
[93] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Yeah scorch, gives you 55+10 or something silly like that, and an oracle CAN fit a 1600mm plate and big pulses.
I can see how well your 1600mm plated Oracles work: http://rooksandkings.com/killboard/?a=kill_related&kll_id=35897
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
102
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:26:00 -
[94] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Onictus wrote: No, its faster than an oracle, but it doesn't have the power past 30km, and if it does its a shield "tank" which is laughable on the scale of a 3 SeBo Tornado.
Its great under 5 people, but that is about it.
Funny, but you get much above 5-10 people (where the Talos remains extremely powerful) and we're no longer in the small gang region.  -Liang Ed: Also, let me know how your 3 SeBo Tornado tanks a Proteus landing on it at zero. My Talos did fine.
Got a running start?
|

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
102
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:29:00 -
[95] - Quote
LOL
For real, three to one odds against faction BS with triage back up and that is the best you got?
How about LXQ2 where they dropped a titan? http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12588868 |

xxMads
Exanimo Inc Psychotic Tendencies.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:29:00 -
[96] - Quote
CCP should create tier 4 BS's with similar bonuses as Tier 3 BC's, just with Capital guns?? |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1055
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:30:00 -
[97] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Onictus wrote: No, its faster than an oracle, but it doesn't have the power past 30km, and if it does its a shield "tank" which is laughable on the scale of a 3 SeBo Tornado.
Its great under 5 people, but that is about it.
Funny, but you get much above 5-10 people (where the Talos remains extremely powerful) and we're no longer in the small gang region.  -Liang Ed: Also, let me know how your 3 SeBo Tornado tanks a Proteus landing on it at zero. My Talos did fine. Got a running start?
No, he landed on me at zero with me pretty much sitting still. You can see it in the video link I posted. In fact, you might learn a lot about how to fly a Talos from watching my noob ass fly it.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
102
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:31:00 -
[98] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Onictus wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Onictus wrote: No, its faster than an oracle, but it doesn't have the power past 30km, and if it does its a shield "tank" which is laughable on the scale of a 3 SeBo Tornado.
Its great under 5 people, but that is about it.
Funny, but you get much above 5-10 people (where the Talos remains extremely powerful) and we're no longer in the small gang region.  -Liang Ed: Also, let me know how your 3 SeBo Tornado tanks a Proteus landing on it at zero. My Talos did fine. Got a running start? No, he landed on me at zero with me pretty much sitting still. You can see it in the video link I posted. In fact, you might learn a lot about how to fly a Talos from watching my noob ass fly it. -Liang
Magic 8 ball says odds are not good, simply because its not worth trying to get the hull out to where I live.
|

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1055
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:33:00 -
[99] - Quote
So squeezing 75 people onto a KM is small gang warfare these days? Maybe that's why you don't like blaster ships....
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1061
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 20:34:00 -
[100] - Quote
Onictus wrote: Magic 8 ball says odds are not good, simply because its not worth trying to get the hull out to where I live.
I wouldn't want to be in an alliance with such a ****** logistics backbone.
-Liang
Ed: Also, I like how you refuse to even enlighten yourself as to what the Talos is actually capable of, and instead rely on **** like claiming 150 people is a "small gang". Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
|

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
104
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:16:00 -
[101] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Onictus wrote: Magic 8 ball says odds are not good, simply because its not worth trying to get the hull out to where I live.
I wouldn't want to be in an alliance with such a ****** logistics backbone. -Liang Ed: Also, I like how you refuse to even enlighten yourself as to what the Talos is actually capable of, and instead rely on **** like claiming 150 people is a "small gang".
LOL
You are sadly mistaken, all I have to do is say the word and as many as I ask for (or can pay for) get delivered. ...I simply have no use for it at the moment.
My idea of small gang is sub 50 ships, usually more like 20(ish) nothing that doesn't float around pretty much anywhere everyday. I never said that 150 is a small gang, and if I did, please, show me where.
I'm involved in bigger stuff certainly, that is why I moved out to null. Play tag with people calling me a "blobber" all while they are they are batphoning to get a bigger gang got old in lowsec.
Liang Nuren wrote:So squeezing 75 people onto a KM is small gang warfare these days? Maybe that's why you don't like blaster ships.... -Liang
and by all means, please, continue making **** up you highness. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1062
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:10:00 -
[102] - Quote
Onictus wrote: Magic 8 ball says odds are not good, simply because its not worth trying to get the hull out to where I live.
Quote: You are sadly mistaken, all I have to do is say the word and as many as I ask for (or can pay for) get delivered. ...I simply have no use for it at the moment.
So first you can't even get the hull delivered and now you just have to pay for it. Backpedal more. 
Quote: My idea of small gang is sub 50 ships, usually more like 20(ish) nothing that doesn't float around pretty much anywhere everyday. I never said that 150 is a small gang, and if I did, please, show me where.
I'm involved in bigger stuff certainly, that is why I moved out to null. Play tag with people calling me a "blobber" all while they are they are batphoning to get a bigger gang got old in lowsec.
and by all means, please, continue making **** up you highness.
You linked a battle report with ~150 people involved in a discussion about small gang warfare. You apparently do consider it to be a small gang - though you back out of it now. As to 50 people being a small gang... rrriiiiigggghhhttttt. We're going to have to agree to disagree on that - though I'm pretty confident that most people would see the world closer to my view than to yours.
But I guess them's the breaks when you do nothing but blob day in and day out.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Noisrevbus
102
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:22:00 -
[103] - Quote
I remember Genos called me delusional when i said "there are people out there who consider 50-man 'small'".
Moral victory . |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
105
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:23:00 -
[104] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:So first you can't even get the hull delivered and now you just have to pay for it. Backpedal more. 
Yeah of course I have to pay for it. Hulls are reimbursed. But there are very few handouts, and yes, I have to pay for the hulls and mods. As much as I would like it they just don't hand you ships.....well anywhere really.
I don't see why this is a hard concept.
Liang Nuren wrote: You linked a battle report with ~150 people involved in a discussion about small gang warfare. You apparently do consider it to be a small gang - though you back out of it now. As to 50 people being a small gang... rrriiiiigggghhhttttt. We're going to have to agree to disagree on that - though I'm pretty confident that most people would see the world closer to my view than to yours.
But I guess them's the breaks when you do nothing but blob day in and day out.
-Liang
You linked a battle report with 600 people. It was more of a response to that. Like I said look up and down my KB, you found what 10 fleet kills out of a hundred?
Because I'm definately "blobbing" in my frigging dramiel and vagabound......neither of which are "fleet" ships.
But hey you can continue creatively interpreting simple statements, its pretty amusing.
Call names all you want, but I'm beginning to question your reading compression. Again, if you look up and down my |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1067
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:49:00 -
[105] - Quote
Onictus wrote: Yeah of course I have to pay for it. Hulls are reimbursed. But there are very few handouts, and yes, I have to pay for the hulls and mods. As much as I would like it they just don't hand you ships.....well anywhere really.
I don't see why this is a hard concept.
I am not disputing the fact you have to pay for the ship - that's a very normal thing. What you said when I suggested that you enlighten yourself as to what a Talos can do:
Quote: Magic 8 ball says odds are not good, simply because its not worth trying to get the hull out to where I live.
Yeah, your alliance logistics are so **** you can't even get a Talos imported. That's pretty bad.
Quote: You linked a battle report with 600 people. It was more of a response to that. Like I said look up and down my KB, you found what 10 fleet kills out of a hundred?
I'm not sure why you think I linked you a battle report with 600 people and I don't think that would be possible. The battle report I linked contained 72 distinct people, of which: - AAA: 18 - Dirt Nap Squad: 27 - Dragoons: 2 - En Garde: 1 - Hedonistic Imperative: 3 - Psychotic Tendencies: 11 - Rooks and Kings: 10
From what I can see, the sides were: Psychotic Tendencies, Rooks and Kings, Dragoons, Hedonistic Imperative (26) vs Dirt Nap Squad, AAA, En Garde (46)
I'm more than willing to believe that R&K had some extra logistics and maybe even a triage carrier or two (it suits them very well). But, that still looks like well within the realm of what you would personally consider small gang combat. It was also a commentary on just how awesome those plate Oracles are.
Quote: Because I'm definately "blobbing" in my frigging dramiel and vagabound......neither of which are "fleet" ships.
But hey you can continue creatively interpreting simple statements, its pretty amusing.
Call names all you want, but I'm beginning to question your reading compression. Again, if you look up and down my KB you find what 10 fleet kills?
The creating interpretation is amusing though.
You unironically tell me that 50 people is small gang combat and somehow think you aren't an epic mega blobber by the standards of the rest of Eve? Really?
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Mfume Apocal
Origin.
343
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:40:00 -
[106] - Quote
from now on, im just gonna call it "10 dudes or less" pvp |

Trinkets friend
Obstergo NEM3SIS.
215
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:45:00 -
[107] - Quote
LOL at you people calling the Naga crap. The following battle report occurred in 2 phases; first a camping by a gang of 5pulse-plate(?) Oracles with lach/huginn/scimi; the second the Stain Empire naga fleet with naga/huginn/lach/claymore/scimis.
http://nem3sis.co.uk/killboard/?a=kill_related&kll_id=4342
The real losses are closer to 48-56, as this doesn't count losses of allies to Nem3sis.
The naga fleet were the real problem, sitting in the 120km range with the skiwmish-link boosted Lachesis pointing from 75-90km. Note this is 12 nagas., able to apha canes, all logis, all tackle. I'm not sure is a 17-20 man fleet is "small gang" enough for Liang, but they took on a fleet of 60 and racefaped for the loss of one ship.
If your Naga is having trouble tracking frigs, you haven't brought enough Huginns (with skirmish links, 50km webs, thanks!). If they can't go fast enough, you haven't got a Claymore (let alone boosting Loki). The skilful employer of men will employ the wise man, the brave man, the covetous man, and the stupid man. Sun Tzu @trinketsfriend on twatter
|

Mortimer Goldman
Hedion University Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 02:16:00 -
[108] - Quote
Nagas aren't bad, but there's really nothing remarkable about NemTHREEsis getting their shit pushed in by another terrible alliance. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1068
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 02:45:00 -
[109] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:LOL at you people calling the Naga crap. The following battle report occurred in 2 phases; first a camping by a gang of 5pulse-plate(?) Oracles with lach/huginn/scimi; the second the Stain Empire naga fleet with naga/huginn/lach/claymore/scimis. http://nem3sis.co.uk/killboard/?a=kill_related&kll_id=4342The real losses are closer to 48-56, as this doesn't count losses of allies to Nem3sis. The naga fleet were the real problem, sitting in the 120km range with the skiwmish-link boosted Lachesis pointing from 75-90km. Note this is 12 nagas., able to apha canes, all logis, all tackle
Nice battle report! Did you get it on fraps? :D
Quote:I'm not sure is a 17-20 man fleet is "small gang" enough for Liang, but they took on a fleet of 60 and racefaped for the loss of one ship.
No, I wouldn't generally call it small gang, but its not so hilariously out of touch that the rest of Eve would be sorely tempted to call it a fleet.
-Liang
Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Tobiaz
Spacerats
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:31:00 -
[110] - Quote
"small gang'' warfare is perhaps more an indicator of the fighting style then of actual numbers. The key being strategic mobility with size being determined by factors like the availability of pilots, shiptype, opposing forces, fleet-discipline and the FC's abilities, etc
But it's indeed noteworthy how EVE has 'grown'. Back in 2004 , during the Xetic war, having 50 pilots in a fleet was even for The Five considered as a serious op aimed at strategic goals like a pos or for abig blockadebuster  [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/Tobiaz/sig_complaints.gif[/img]
This needs fixin' |
|

Noisrevbus
103
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:39:00 -
[111] - Quote
On the Naga.
Trinkets friend wrote:LOL at you people calling the Naga crap.
I don't think the Naga is crap, but it needs to be understood against it's background of racial balance next to class balance.
I think i wrote a piece on that in- or around the launch of Crucible with estimations and a short follow-up.
Mobile Sniping unsurprisingly revolve around mobility and sniping. The Naga has better sniping-capacity and worse mobility. The sniping-advtantage is more marginal than the mobility-disadvantage. Thus, the Naga is the worst of the new ships, but it isn't necessarily bad (or have an untolerable difference, which = imbalance). Looking at the Naga to it's peers make it much more balanced than other Caldari snipers (the Naga is much closer to the Tornado than the Eagle is [was] to the Muninn). It's also closer to it's environment - the Naga can actually draw on it's advantage and do some unique or interesting things. For all intents and purposes the Naga is quite alright.
The problem is that sniping is a racial trait, bonuses are divided in that manner and "100km mobile sniping" is the mainline form of sniping in today's game (it has been so since 2008 with the exception of BE's shortlived "unprobable sniping" project). Thus being the least mobile mean their trait is marginalized per standard, having a negative balance ontop of that mean the ships themselves are marginalized from their role.
Then throw that up against the background of recurring nerf-calls to other Caldari ships (Drakes, Tengus, Falcons) and you will understand why it's a sensitive topic.
All in all, the Naga is quite alright. The tier 3 BC have a fairly good class-balance. The class have a very poor balance to many other classes in the game. Minmatar is quite strong in several of it's racial traits (mobility, alpha, fitting), which is why they catch alot of flak on the forums. Amarr is also quite strong in it's racial traits (heavy armor; BS and Caps, organized incursion PvE etc). Gallente has gotten stronger, and slowly more accepted, in it's racial roles (rush, brawl, drones, top tier PvE etc). Caldari however have issues adapting an important part of it's role (sniping, for both turrets and missiles) while it's other roles are under constant siege and rocky in it's balance (heavy shield tanking, electronic warfare, entry level PvE etc). Where they are not necessarily stronger today outside of select ships (while those ships are under CSM-CCP review). |

Mfume Apocal
Origin.
347
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:22:00 -
[112] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:"small gang'' warfare is perhaps more an indicator of the fighting style then of actual numbers. The key being strategic mobility with size being determined by factors like the availability of pilots, shiptype, opposing forces, fleet-discipline and the FC's abilities, etc
I disagree, a 50 man nanogang isn't small gang*, but a 3 man RRBS gang is, despite RRBS being the exact opposite of in terms of style. With some exceptions, once you get beyond 10-12 dudes, stuff that is important to small gangs* (utility especially) gets trumped by other considerations (DPS projection, EHP).
*less than 10 dudes |

Noisrevbus
103
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 09:25:00 -
[113] - Quote
To expand on my post above - but going slightly off topic in this thread:
Now, if i wanted to deal with Caldari i'd probably do something like this:
Rebalance fitting and fine-tune performance of all missiles. Missile haters would not be too happy though, since any marginal nerfs to HML (which is balanced around having the longest optimal to no falloff, and reliable damage flow to it's drawbacks of delayed damage; so you can't drop it's range or core damage too much without breaking design concept) would be accompanied by major buffs to other missile systems (such as Cruise missiles and ships that use them, which should be, and thus overtake, a reliable projectible damage role around environment-reasonable ranges, like 100km).
I would leave the Drake and Tengu largely untouched (though i'd probably look over bonus application on all Tech III subsystems, to see if some mistakes were made in how bonuses apply). I would instead touch HAC, BS and Recon, giving Caldari at least one techy, strong, true mobile sniping option (pref. with missiles) that could in full enter into kiting-skirmish as well. If it takes one of the bonuses to achieve that, it is fine. I would look over ECM as an isolated system, and balance it (not nerf it). I'd adress it's poor scaling and exploitability (eg., one module per target), but i'd also adress it's cumbersome application for it's user (eg., scripts) and buff the pre-nerfed state of the Falcon (slots, bonuses, drones). If i already was halfway into a major overhaul of Caldari i'd probably touch on the tech one ECM platforms as well, balancing their ECM-to-other appeal, more similar to the Rook. Perhaps making the Scorpion a somewhat mobile ECM-Cruise sniper and the Raven a heavier tank-spank platform.
I'd also look into fitting options and usability of shield-based RR and Capital use.
In total, these things would be a massive buff to Caldari - it would marginalize Drakes a tad, make ECM less exploitable in "lowsec-like" situations and possibly take some PvE or general purpose PvP edge off the Tengu - but it would replace their roles that so many hate by other Cadari options, giving true 2km/s kiting missile snipers, new 1km/s 100-150km missile heavy hitters and new projection-bricks (oversized Drakes). It would also mean less Falcon "permajam" blankets on few small-gang pilots, but it would mean more powerful Rook-like action and ECM in larger balanced fights. People will blob with that and cause ECM-rage. No matter how you balance, Caldari will always be Caldari until CCP decide to change their whole racial profile.
That is balance as opposed to underbalance - something else will overtake the role, it's not like brick-projection, missile-reliability or ECM will disappear, it's in the bonuses and traits. |

Mfume Apocal
Origin.
347
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:38:00 -
[114] - Quote
Noisrevbus wrote:...giving true 2km/s kiting missile snipers...
What is wrong with the Cerb in this role? |

Sa'haira
Trans-Solar Works
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:51:00 -
[115] - Quote
hi, Talos is easy mode.
thanks for reading. |

Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
51
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:53:00 -
[116] - Quote
Mfume Apocal wrote:Noisrevbus wrote:...giving true 2km/s kiting missile snipers... What is wrong with the Cerb in this role?
I agree, the cerb seems to hit all the points you raised just fine. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
106
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:46:00 -
[117] - Quote
Darek Castigatus wrote:Mfume Apocal wrote:Noisrevbus wrote:...giving true 2km/s kiting missile snipers... What is wrong with the Cerb in this role? I agree, the cerb seems to hit all the points you raised just fine.
Until someone bring mass sniping drakes or Tengu's then Cerb gets smushed pretty quickly. For all of their advantages, you need an opponent in close range battleships or BC's for it to really work.
Basically pulse baddons or canes.
|

Strategos
Genco Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:32:00 -
[118] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:IMO the Tier 3s were well executed: the overall ship class is reasonably well balanced in the overall ecosystem of the game, while ship balance within the class is also pretty good. For my purposes, the Talos and Tornado far outshine the Naga and Oracle.
The problem with the Naga is its so damn slow and the problem with the Oracle is that 4 mids is absolutely mandatory in this ship class: MWD, LSE, Disruptor, Web.
-Liang
Not every ship is to ment have enough mids to tackle, speed, and buffer..There are already too many ships that can do this. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
106
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:37:00 -
[119] - Quote
Strategos wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:IMO the Tier 3s were well executed: the overall ship class is reasonably well balanced in the overall ecosystem of the game, while ship balance within the class is also pretty good. For my purposes, the Talos and Tornado far outshine the Naga and Oracle.
The problem with the Naga is its so damn slow and the problem with the Oracle is that 4 mids is absolutely mandatory in this ship class: MWD, LSE, Disruptor, Web.
-Liang Not every ship is to ment have enough mids to tackle, speed, and buffer..There are already too many ships that can do this.
Large turrets inside point range (exempting blasters now) is generally a bad idea IMO...more so with pulses that have pretty crappy tracking as a design feature to start with.
AC's are kinda workable, but far from optimal. Oracles are better off with a meatshield of some sort and about 25km of range. |

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:05:00 -
[120] - Quote
Mfume Apocal wrote:Noisrevbus wrote:...giving true 2km/s kiting missile snipers... What is wrong with the Cerb in this role?
maybe that it caps out after 4 or 5 MWD cycles |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |