| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Burchov
Lyrus Associates
   |
Posted - 2008.06.02 09:24:00 -
[61]
/signed. And then don't do silly things with it like giving it a jump drive, T2 tag and making it way more expensive than a regular freighter...
________
Invention profit calculator |
Sureau
N'Th'Rack Squadron
Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 11:15:00 -
[62]
Eve need a cargoship class betwen industrial and freighter.
|
Jason Edwards
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 11:51:00 -
[63]
My idea how to do it.
------------------------
"There was this bright flash of light - and now this egg shaped thing is on my screen - did I level up?" |
namelessclone01
blackbox ops
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 16:29:00 -
[64]
/signed
100-200k m3 would be ideal.
the cost should be higher though, somewhere in the range of 300M+ (since the cargo-rigged hauler already costs around 180M).
|
procurement specialist
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 16:58:00 -
[65]
i think it needs to have slots still. even if i had to use them all to fit 120km3 with expander 2's it should still be able to fit a couple of warp core stabs or inertial stabilizers. I also think it should be able to scoop from wrecks.
|
Kalinda Veldrin
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 19:30:00 -
[66]
I fully support this issue.
|
SentryRaven
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 20:50:00 -
[67]
 Originally by: procurement specialist
i think it needs to have slots still. even if i had to use them all to fit 120km3 with expander 2's it should still be able to fit a couple of warp core stabs or inertial stabilizers. I also think it should be able to scoop from wrecks.
Not what I was intending.
It should be just a smaller freighter. Nor slots, no rigs, no scooping cans or corpses.
|
Tesseract d'Urberville
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 20:57:00 -
[68]
Supported.
---------------------------------
Thomas Hardy is going to eat your brains. |
MentaFox
StarHunt
Fallout Project
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 21:28:00 -
[69]
yes
----------------------
|
Lo3d3R
MAFIA
Pirate Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 21:34:00 -
[70]
big duh here, should have been there from the start.
___________________
Sexy Time:  |
|
|
Lord Fitz
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.06.03 03:16:00 -
[71]
100,000-200,000m3
Cheaper than a freighter, though price isn't the more important bit. Having it somewhat faster and more agile would be good. No jump drive. I personally don't mind the jump freighters handling and cargo size, bit it's a little expensive and well over the top for most tasks. I think smaller than 100,000m3 means it's not alot better than a hauler, greater than 200-300 would be starting to errode jump freighters and freighters.
|
Ravens Aunt
|
Posted - 2008.06.03 12:03:00 -
[72]
Supported.
How about a utility transport....bit like Thunderbird 2....slot in modules such as extra cargo or bay for rigged ships?
|
Tuvar Hiede
Cold Suns Squadron
|
Posted - 2008.06.03 12:19:00 -
[73]
/signed
It's true that the gap between standard industrials and freightors is too big, and something that falls between them would be great.
|
Shaitis
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.06.03 12:55:00 -
[74]
Edited by: Shaitis on 03/06/2008 12:54:48
Full support for that topic
"What is funnier ? 20 Matari slaves pinned to one tree or 1 Matari slave pinned to 20 trees ? |
Sovereign533
Anoint
|
Posted - 2008.06.03 13:18:00 -
[75]
Edited by: Sovereign533 on 03/06/2008 13:18:41
please give me something in the middle...
my 36k m¦ Impel is to small... and my 786k m¦ Providence is to big =\
|
Takimi Star
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 23:48:00 -
[76]
fully support this.
WOuld also be nice to see a bigger transport... maybe something that can fit a few tractors and haul more than 1 jetcan worth of ore...
|
procurement specialist
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 00:24:00 -
[77]
ittyV with rigs and gsc can haul over 2 full cans of ore. just fyi i make my wife use hers when i mine.
|
Draenila
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 01:52:00 -
[78]
/signed
|
Theramin Dogon
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 06:04:00 -
[79]
Originally by: Nariana Verex
I support the idea of a mini-freighter, but if CCP's main reason for not wanting to introduce a new ship type is because of the art involved
If this is true, this is one of the most ******** things I've heard. |
Deej Montana
Outbound Flight
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 06:37:00 -
[80]
There's a definite need for something between the huge, expensive freighters and the current smaller industrials. I support this idea 100%.
|
|
|
Jennil Hozbay
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 20:21:00 -
[81]
|
Euriti
SniggWaffe
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 20:27:00 -
[82]
Edited by: Euriti on 11/06/2008 20:27:24
Supported |
Dagas Hunter
|
Posted - 2008.06.12 01:07:00 -
[83]
I agree! The gap is too large. going from a 1m isk ship to a almost 1b isk ship is not an easy task. a ship around 100m and 70-100k m3 would be great.
Great idea!
|
Cyberbite
Syrkos Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.06.12 01:34:00 -
[84]
Having just recently gotten my freighter on an alt I realize just how big that thing is compared to the medium amount I need to move...so I of course support this as well :D |
Zorok
LEGI0N
F.E.A.R Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.12 01:53:00 -
[85]
I agree we need something that can haul more than the T1 haulers. I believe that the deep space haulers should have had a much larger cargo capacity but I'm willing to take a mini-freighter instead if this won't work.
|
Elektrea
SniggWaffe
|
Posted - 2008.06.12 04:04:00 -
[86]
supported |
marie blueprint
|
Posted - 2008.06.12 11:43:00 -
[87]
yes |
Morgenrei
|
Posted - 2008.06.12 14:11:00 -
[88]
Would be great. |
Mulco
Metalheads
|
Posted - 2008.06.12 19:13:00 -
[89]
I would buy one.
/signed
|
SentryRaven
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 20:56:00 -
[90]
Bump to gather more support, please
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |