| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1104
   |
Posted - 2012.05.27 00:16:00 -
[151] - Quote
Well, sure, 3*X at 150k is better than 1*X at 250k, but worse than 2*X at 250k, so the question is, exactly how many could you sell at which price levels ?
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T
http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
954
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 00:21:00 -
[152] - Quote
Well, more than the "3x 150k" etc., the question actually implied prices had no reason not to crash after a while. 
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1104
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 00:28:00 -
[153] - Quote
If the majority of tech extractors just decided "eh, screw it, we're only going to sell half our tech and use the rest internally or just sit on it", you can bet the stable price would be close to double of the stable price of selling it all, so they'd make about the same ISK but also have truckloads of leftover tech for internal use.
But that would be extremely difficult to pull off.
The simpler alternative is to just stick with a stable price they're happy with and wait it out until all stockpiles of non-extractors have been completely exhausted. Again, technetium traded volume has not shrunk radically from the days it used to cost less than 100k ISK per unit, so all in all, by sticking to a 200k price level, they'd eventually be the only sellers and still make more ISK even if they start getting stockpiles of their own.
That's not easy to pull off either, due to the smaller producers being in urgent need of liquid funds, but far easier than the alternative.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T
http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |
AnakieNine
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 03:03:00 -
[154] - Quote
Some people aren't in the cartel. Me included :)
|
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
969
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:04:00 -
[155] - Quote
Isn't it amazing how Technetium is religiously following trend lines I drawn months ago? (Feel free to check past charts).
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
344
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 01:25:00 -
[156] - Quote
careful now, VV, go too hard and you might chafe. |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
971
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 05:58:00 -
[157] - Quote
corestwo wrote:careful now, VV, go too hard and you might chafe.
Don't worry, I always carry an healthy amount of Nanite Repair Paste 
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
AnakieNine
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 21:57:00 -
[158] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Isn't it amazing how Technetium is religiously following trend lines I drawn months ago? (Feel free to check past charts).
I missed them VV but based on history I bet my sell patterns roughly match your graphs.
|
El Geo
Pathfinders.
37
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 00:01:00 -
[159] - Quote
shame they arent doing it with neodymium aswell |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
977
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 00:24:00 -
[160] - Quote
AnakieNine wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Isn't it amazing how Technetium is religiously following trend lines I drawn months ago? (Feel free to check past charts). I missed them VV but based on history I bet my sell patterns roughly match your graphs.
I just posted updated graphs both on Technetium and Nanotransistors. I am sure you will be able and see what is going on in there. Notice the 2W pin bar on the Nanos weekly chart and thus its projected target.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |