Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 19:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
Dominion market analysis : sky's the limit on technetium (long term) started by Akita T
I think this one deserves to stay alive 
|

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 19:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tc's been sticking at 100K for awhile now.
Breakout to happen soon (within a week or two) - Is my purely guesstimated err.. guess.
|

Soldarius
Peek-A-Boo Bombers
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 01:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
TornSoul wrote:Tc's been sticking at 100K for awhile now.
Breakout to happen soon (within a week or two) - Is my purely guesstimated err.. guess.
Based on what? Obvious manipulation attempt is obvious.
|

Loney
CyberDyne R-D
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 02:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Soldarius wrote:TornSoul wrote:Tc's been sticking at 100K for awhile now.
Breakout to happen soon (within a week or two) - Is my purely guesstimated err.. guess.
Based on what? Obvious manipulation attempt is obvious.
Based on my thoughts of buying 1m Tech tomorrow... or soon! |

Chevalleis
The Legendary Conquest THE D0MINION
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 03:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
|

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 15:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Soldarius wrote:TornSoul wrote:Tc's been sticking at 100K for awhile now.
Breakout to happen soon (within a week or two) - Is my purely guesstimated err.. guess.
Based on what? Obvious manipulation attempt is obvious.
As said, it's a guess (on the timeframe)
That it *will* happen I have no doubt about, baring any CCP intervention.
The upwards pressure on Tc hasn't changed - Read the original forum thread for the reasons why.
As such, prices will go up again (now that the first scare is over) - Just a matter of when - Not "if".
|

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 16:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
I think it is a matter of "if", in that demand across the board has eaten ****. If the numbers pickup and people start blowing up spaceships again, then we'll see that bottleneck in action, and I think it will really pop now that we've chewed through a lot of stockpiles. However, this outcome depends on if this is just an exaggerated seasonal slump or if, in fact, Eve really is dying (exaggerating of course, but you know what I mean). |

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 17:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
Elise DarkStar wrote:However, this outcome depends on if this is just an exaggerated seasonal slump or if, in fact, Eve really is dying (exaggerating of course, but you know what I mean).
I don't think it's an _exaggerated_ seasonal slump - But just the usual seasonal slump *combined* with the lack of new content in the Incarna expansion to draw in new/old players (thus making it look like an exaggerated slump)
Regardless - The numbers would have to further fall catastrophically before the Tc bottleneck would become a paper bottleneck only.
|

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 17:13:00 -
[9] - Quote
TornSoul wrote:I don't think it's an _exaggerated_ seasonal slump - But just the usual seasonal slump *combined* with the lack of new content in the Incarna expansion to draw in new/old players (thus making it look like an exaggerated slump)
Ya, that's precisely what I meant. Sorry if that was worded poorly.
|

Wabs
Bite me inc. Narwhals Ate My Duck
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.19 21:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
Why did tech drop 6k in a day or two after staying at about 100k for weeks....? Any reason?  |
|

Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
13
|
Posted - 2011.09.20 21:45:00 -
[11] - Quote
Crash and burn, baby. Crash and BUUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN.
(I never really enjoyed having to carry more than a billion ISK worth of reaction materials in my hauler) |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
334
|
Posted - 2011.09.20 23:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
The funny part is that most of the other moonmins don't seem to be picking up the slack in price, the technetium traded volume is not spiking, the corresponding advanced materials have been slowly drifting downwards for weeks or even months earlier, and quite a few T2 ships have been trending downwards too (with the noteworthy exception of the Hulk, which is surprisingly strong on an upwards trajectory lately).
To me, all of that spells a significant demand drop for T2 ships in general... ...which would be understandable given the user count drop EVE has been experiencing lately (and for those still around, a general "shooty" activity level drop). I can't say I understand what the deal with Hulks might be though. Then again, haven't been around that much for the past 3 months or so.
I fully expect most of the other moon minerals to start drifting downwards sooner or later too. Too bad for trader wallets that you can't short in EVE, eh ? http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Contributor_name:Akita_T#Contributions_link_collection |

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 00:15:00 -
[13] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Too bad for trader wallets that you can't short in EVE, eh ?
Relying on general upward trends sucks balls, especially when demand is eating **** across the board.
Not happy.
|

Soldarius
Peek-A-Boo Bombers
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 02:06:00 -
[14] - Quote
I recall reading a post from a former NC higher level mucky-muck (or perhaps it was Mittani, cbb to go find it again) that the DRF has been flooding the market with tech, which would exert a downward pressure on price. But since I don't usually watch moongoo, I could be wrong on the effect.
Either way, they [DRF] is eager to cash in on the moongoo tech *****. "How do you kill that which has no life?" |

Cyniac
Twilight Star Rangers Black Thorne Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 17:01:00 -
[15] - Quote
Akita T wrote:To me, all of that spells a significant demand drop for T2 ships in general... ...which would be understandable given the user count drop EVE has been experiencing lately (and for those still around, a general "shooty" activity level drop). I can't say I understand what the deal with Hulks might be though. Then again, haven't been around that much for the past 3 months or so.
As a ship manufacturer I'm confirming that there seems to be a slump in ship sales - it's not critical but it's certainly noticeable, ships take longer to move and prices are dropping because of oversupply. Not a great business to be in right now. (Though I'll take a look at the hulk - hulks have always had skin tight margins, they might just be adjusting to a more normal level)
|

Netheranthem
Eve Engineering Finance Eve Engineering
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.23 21:45:00 -
[16] - Quote
This seems surreal. I mean, tech has a 7% margin on the market since one or two days. It would seem like some people have a lot (Not necessarily a lot for an alliance, since they harvest it at a 100/hour rate but a lot ISK-wise) of tech to sell at once, but the quantity traded doesn't tell us about it, except that there is a small increase in quantity. So, I told myself, whatever, let's take those billions from the market. Let's just hope it doesn't collapse on me... again.
Also you might have seen those buy orders for 1 unit increasing the buy price artificially, all that leads me to think some guys have tech to sell, and that manufacturers also try to buy from the buy orders now, since the selling price is staying about the same. |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
362
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 00:50:00 -
[17] - Quote
Odd how Nanotransistors had a blip but Technetium didn't... http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Contributor_name:Akita_T#Contributions_link_collection |

Tasko Pal
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 01:28:00 -
[18] - Quote
I never remember, but with the end of summer, we should be seeing an increasing in player activity with the return of students to school, right?
So from what I gather, there's no big changes on the horizon unless more people come in, CCP adds content, or someone big gets greedy and/or organized in the northwest.
|

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 01:45:00 -
[19] - Quote
The "back to school" bump has been muted due to generally falling numbers from incarna.
Tech and derivatives have been dominated by stockpiles being cashed in. Nano stockpiles may have run out, whereas fullerides and straight tech have not yet done so. |

Tasko Pal
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 03:41:00 -
[20] - Quote
Thanks for the info Elise. |
|

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 07:07:00 -
[21] - Quote
Elise DarkStar wrote:The "back to school" bump has been muted due to generally falling numbers from incarna.
Tech and derivatives have been dominated by stockpiles being cashed in. Nano stockpiles may have run out, whereas fullerides and straight tech have not yet done so.
I doubt that. Nanos are dominated by reaction towers and many low sec POS owners switched to something else for 4 week ago, when the price for nanos crashed. The last 2 weeks were dominated by a shortage because of less POS reactions. This is repeating now. |

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 12:27:00 -
[22] - Quote
Nomad I wrote:I doubt that. Nanos are dominated by reaction towers and many low sec POS owners switched to something else for 4 week ago, when the price for nanos crashed. The last 2 weeks were dominated by a shortage because of less POS reactions. This is repeating now.
nonresponsive
|

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 18:23:00 -
[23] - Quote
No mention of a moon re-balance in the winter expansion.
To the Techmobile! |

Netheranthem
Eve Engineering Finance Eve Engineering
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 18:50:00 -
[24] - Quote
Elise DarkStar wrote:No mention of a moon re-balance in the winter expansion.
To the Techmobile! Plus they said more T2 stuff! Go buy tech! |

Angsty Teenager
We Are Furious
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 21:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
I lurv how everybody assumes CCP would tell us about moon re-balancing because we all know that wouldn't lead to rampant speculation.
On a separate note, buy thulium. |

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 14:59:00 -
[26] - Quote
Seems Tc is back on track?
Been at 100k+ for a week now
|

Elise DarkStar
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
139
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 15:25:00 -
[27] - Quote
TornSoul wrote:Seems Tc is back on track?
Been at 100k+ for a week now
I'm assuming player numbers are back up.
|

Loney
CyberDyne R-D
5
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 05:51:00 -
[28] - Quote
Hmmmm..... |

Dream Five
Renegade Pleasure Androids Pleasure Syndicate
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 13:05:00 -
[29] - Quote
This might have to do with the jump in JF demand since a lot of tech goes to capital capacitors for JFs. |

Miss Margin
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 16:36:00 -
[30] - Quote
Dream Five wrote:This might have to do with the jump in JF demand since a lot of tech goes to capital capacitors for JFs.
There is a jump in demand for JFs? This character is for Sale, pure trade skills.-á https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=517979#post517979
|
|

Riley Moore
Sentinum Research
57
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 17:15:00 -
[31] - Quote
Tech now at 121.8k a unit.
Have fun. Need Researched BPO's? Be it drones, ammo, charges, you name it, visit my forum store now! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=445524#post445524 |

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
12
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 18:06:00 -
[32] - Quote
Riley Moore wrote:Tech now at 121.8k a unit.
Expansion/patch done and no Tc moon nerf done - or immediately in sight.
Hence - The speculators/manipulators are back at work 
Oh and maybe throw in a hint of increased demand (more players again)
But I honestly think the latter is the least of the effects.
|

Loney
CyberDyne R-D
5
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 19:46:00 -
[33] - Quote
Riley Moore wrote:Tech now at 121.8k a unit.
Have fun.
It woudl be nice to hit 150k in the next 2 months :) or higher if possible... Don't sell yourself short! |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
573
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 20:42:00 -
[34] - Quote
Whee, panic modes, those are the awesomest !!! Too bad I won't be much around during the holidays.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Contributor_name:Akita_T#Contributions_link_collection |

Mantra Achura
Community for Justice BricK sQuAD.
10
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 18:56:00 -
[35] - Quote
I see, Nanotransistors have been a great investment in recent days... |

Loney
CyberDyne R-D
5
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 16:57:00 -
[36] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Whee, panic modes, those are the awesomest !!! Too bad I won't be much around during the holidays.
P.S. I hear the goons are marching in force into Branch reinforcing POSes left and right. I might be wrong though, it was just a few unconfirmed bits of news. Can somebody confirm that's the case ? If that's true, I fully expect tech to finally "go cartel" to a large enough degree and even break 200k before any tech nerf announcements are made. But that's just wild speculations.
This perhaps:
Soo goons announced last night that they are going to deploy to branch and wipe out White Noise.
Soundcloud of Mittens giving the speach. http://soundcloud.com/eddicted/state-of-the-goonion-dec-2011
Kugu Thread: (stipud auto blockout you will have to fill in the **** yourself) http://www.**********.com/showthread.php?12604-Start-the-War-Engines-Branching-out-to-Branch |

TraderAlt 4153172618
Jovian Labs Jovian Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 19:42:00 -
[37] - Quote
Looks like it is dropping now, I suspect several people invested heavily on the announcement of the invasion, expecting tech production to drop in the future.
At this point it's speculation on where it's going to end up with at least a good number of people doing some profit taking on the stocks they bought at ~90k and have been holding while tech held at 100K.
The long term price is yet to be seen (can the cluster ******* manage a cartel?) but I think for now we're going manipulation and stockpile sales until things sort them selves out post invasion.
Tech at 100k is cheap and unless ccp announces something, I think it's still a buy up to 125k. But what do I know, I am still liquidating Assault Frigs.
|

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
61
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 17:46:00 -
[38] - Quote
Saving this from being auto-locked.
|

Alisa Vaun
Angelic Refuge
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 02:26:00 -
[39] - Quote
So we're back to Tc related reactions losing isk again. Any explanations besides duping? |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
307
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 08:03:00 -
[40] - Quote
Alisa Vaun wrote:So we're back to Tc related reactions losing isk again. Any explanations besides duping?
Excess of supply? Yearly end of the price highs once Christmas time is over? Bleh I am almost (notice the *almost*) enticed to log in and check it out. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
28
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 15:18:00 -
[41] - Quote
Obviously the only real explanation is "duping".
Technetium is a "bottleneck". When general demand rises, the "bottleneck" gets squeezed and prices rise. Significant price shift trends create volatility in those prices as they shift to a new equilibrium. Price volatility leads to temporary imbalances in inputs and outputs, which are then corrected by the market.
That or "duping". |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1039
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 15:38:00 -
[42] - Quote
Advanced material market prices usually lag behind raw material market prices by anywhere from 1 week to 3 weeks. The intermediate reaction market prices are based on a tiny sampling and are subject to wild and unpredictable swings. Add a recent raw technetium price spike and that already explains almost everything that needs explaining. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
61
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 21:00:00 -
[43] - Quote
Hmmm Tc about to go nuclear?
415K units in 11 sell orders only on the market in Jita as of right now.
Never ever seen that little up for sale....
|

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 21:04:00 -
[44] - Quote
It was wiped out to scraps at 150k pu two weeks ago.
Definitely a strong upward trend with all this activity (general demand for ships and mods). |

Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
101
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 13:05:00 -
[45] - Quote
So I'm going to take the fact that nobody posts about technetium anymore as a sign that few people are speculating in the tech market anymore... |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
72
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 16:10:00 -
[46] - Quote
The goons did it!
/looks around
Hey I beat Brock to it.  |

Herman Klaus
Touched By Klaus
42
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 09:05:00 -
[47] - Quote
This thread again...... |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1040
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 15:21:00 -
[48] - Quote
Well, given the "sledgehammer knocking on very thick styrofoam ceiling"-looking nature of the market price graph in the past few months, I'd say the undeath status of the thread is at least mildly justifiable. But yeah, even I grow somewhat tired of it - after all, it's been what, almost two and half years since the first post ? http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 17:44:00 -
[49] - Quote
Better one thread than a new post every 2-4 weeks  |

Countesss
University of Caille Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 17:52:00 -
[50] - Quote
Ring mining...the death of techs sky limit? Will be fun to see the panic and crashing |
|

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:12:00 -
[51] - Quote
I think we'll still have at least a year before we'll have to worry about that  |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
131
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:23:00 -
[52] - Quote
I don't see why there will be "panic and crashing".
People will still want T2 stuff right up until the minute that the new sourced materials start hitting the market. Far more likely is a slow decline as you get within a month of the change, then a slightly steeper decline as the new material actually starts hitting the market down to whatever target area ccp is aiming for, if they dont f it up.
It will all be very anti-climactic. |

Countesss
University of Caille Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:38:00 -
[53] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:I don't see why there will be "panic and crashing".
People will still want T2 stuff right up until the minute that the new sourced materials start hitting the market. Far more likely is a slow decline as you get within a month of the change, then a slightly steeper decline as the new material actually starts hitting the market down to whatever target area ccp is aiming for, if they dont f it up.
It will all be very anti-climactic.
Same reason most prices inflate or deflate drastically...the speculators either hoarding or dumping their stocks. Soon as the change is official, I can guarantee the price bursts. Surely some interesting days ahead for tech.
|

Tasko Pal
Spallated Garniferous Schist
197
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:39:00 -
[54] - Quote
Countesss wrote:Ring mining...the death of techs sky limit? Will be fun to see the panic and crashing 
Depends where you can ring mine tech. If it's in high sec (I don't think CCP is dumb enough to do that), then you probably will see a big crash in tech. If it's in deepest darkest 0.0, then that could drop tech a bit, but not enough to cripple it. If it's only found in the most hellish of wormholes, then you might not see a dent in tech production. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
131
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:44:00 -
[55] - Quote
Countesss wrote:Same reason most prices inflate or deflate drastically...the speculators either hoarding or dumping their stocks. Soon as the change is official, I can guarantee the price bursts. Surely some interesting days ahead for tech.
You're assuming people have speculative stockpiles. The price has risen 50% and nothing has come to market besides what would be coming out of moons. Even if there were, you're suggesting that people who are holding through the fastest rise in a year, will suddenly panic sell as a mechanic change they know is coming gets introduced?
You basically made an off-the-cuff remark without putting any thought into it or having any knowledge of the subject, and now you look a little silly. |

Herman Klaus
Touched By Klaus
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 21:53:00 -
[56] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:Countesss wrote:Same reason most prices inflate or deflate drastically...the speculators either hoarding or dumping their stocks. Soon as the change is official, I can guarantee the price bursts. Surely some interesting days ahead for tech. You're assuming people have speculative stockpiles. The price has risen 50% and nothing has come to market besides what would be coming out of moons. Even if there were, you're suggesting that people who are holding through the fastest rise in a year, will suddenly panic sell as a mechanic change they know is coming gets introduced? You basically made an off-the-cuff remark without putting any thought into it or having any knowledge of the subject, and now you look a little silly.
Holding a mountain of Tech you bought at 135k i bet! |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
131
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 22:16:00 -
[57] - Quote
Herman Klaus wrote:Holding a mountain of Tech you bought at 135k i bet!
That's because you're an idiot.
**** it actually, let's bet. Name the bet, loser pays 3rd party costs.
|

Herman Klaus
Touched By Klaus
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 23:00:00 -
[58] - Quote
Y U NO MAKE SENSE |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
131
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 23:07:00 -
[59] - Quote
You said that "you bet", so let's bet. Put a few billion down on your bet, if you're so sure.
Or were you just making a useless throwaway comment? |

Herman Klaus
Touched By Klaus
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 23:11:00 -
[60] - Quote
Trolololol |
|

Countesss
University of Caille Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 23:20:00 -
[61] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote: stuff
You're taking far too much testosterone there buddy, take a chill pill, change your tampon, take a deep breath... it'll be ok.
|

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
131
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 23:37:00 -
[62] - Quote
lol
a "trolld" and a "umad?" in a row. two people post without thinking, two people get called on it, two people revert to cheap logical fallacies instead of just admitting they posted without thinking
maybe you'll both think before you post next time
probably not though |

Countesss
University of Caille Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 23:53:00 -
[63] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:gibberish
Angry man: "The world is crazy!" The world: "jesus, that guy's an idiot...."
There's no point in arguing with you, seeing how quickly you reverted to a brainless aggressive brute. I'm too old for that type of trash, I know when there is no point. Enjoy the rest of your day |

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
69
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:54:00 -
[64] - Quote
TornSoul wrote:Hmmm Tc about to go nuclear?
(From post #43)
Would appear to have come through (and ongoing)
|

Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
294
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 22:29:00 -
[65] - Quote
there are no speculative stockpiles of tech left, it's just common sense. everyone's expected a nerf to be just around the corner for over a year
the reason the price is going through the roof is all stockpiles are gone, they're dead, they are ex-stockpiles: and so suddenly empire is making do with a lower supply than it's had (and tech wars cause interdictions in the supply as towers get reinforced and die, and i use goonswarm's market power to cause shocks that result in permanent price hikes)
as we discovered with p/d the market can sustain crazy moongoo prices, and there's simply nothing holding it back: since there's no stockpiles, you're left with a huge demand and a restricted supply that will keep spiking prices right up until the new supply actually comes in |

Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
294
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 22:55:00 -
[66] - Quote
i accidentally all the tech |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1047
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 23:09:00 -
[67] - Quote
Retar Aveymone wrote:there are no speculative stockpiles of tech left, it's just common sense You forget lazy people with way too much unused ISK. I am pretty sure there's still at least several million units (or several dozens of millions) sitting in random bored people's hangars. Granted, some of those piles might never actually see the market again, and the entire stockpiles that would see the market again might only last for a few weeks (or even less), but who knows. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
294
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 23:13:00 -
[68] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Retar Aveymone wrote:there are no speculative stockpiles of tech left, it's just common sense You forget lazy people with way too much unused ISK. I am pretty sure there's still at least several million units sitting in random bored people's hangars. Granted, they might never actually see the market again, and the entire stockpiles might only last for a few weeks, but who knows. Several million units is nothing at this point. More importantly though, there's no actively traded stockpiles to be dumped into spikes and the like, that would counteract what I can do to the market. If someone's got a million units in a hangar it's because they forgot about it and I can ignore it. |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1047
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 23:43:00 -
[69] - Quote
Yeah, I generally agree, whatever leftover stockpiles exist don't matter much practically in the medium or long term, was mostly just nitpicking ;) http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
180
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 01:34:00 -
[70] - Quote
Retar Aveymone wrote:Akita T wrote:Retar Aveymone wrote:there are no speculative stockpiles of tech left, it's just common sense You forget lazy people with way too much unused ISK. I am pretty sure there's still at least several million units sitting in random bored people's hangars. Granted, they might never actually see the market again, and the entire stockpiles might only last for a few weeks, but who knows. Several million units is nothing at this point. More importantly though, there's no actively traded stockpiles to be dumped into spikes and the like, that would counteract what I can do to the market. If someone's got a million units in a hangar it's because they forgot about it and I can ignore it.
you really should just ignore akita T's pathological need to be right even if it means resorting to semantics and "nitpicking"
just fyi |
|

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1047
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 01:36:00 -
[71] - Quote
corestwo wrote:you really should just ignore akita T's pathological need to be right even if it means resorting to semantics and "nitpicking" just fyi

http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
69
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 18:34:00 -
[72] - Quote
No one wants to stick out their neck with a brave guess at how it might go?
Akita?
I stuck mine out with the "going nuclear" one - Must be someone else at the bat now  |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
649
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 22:53:00 -
[73] - Quote
TornSoul wrote:No one wants to stick out their neck with a brave guess at how it might go? Akita? I stuck mine out with the "going nuclear" one - Must be someone else at the bat now 
It will hit a weekly trend line soon. If you want I can send you a link to the chart. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1061
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 03:58:00 -
[74] - Quote
TornSoul wrote:No one wants to stick out their neck with a brave guess at how it might go? Akita? Too many variables, and most of them are no longer economic in nature, but rather political.
A fairly large relevant one would be the likelihood of the newly-announced Technetium "cartel" to actually happen in reality, its extent, its effectiveness in keeping their members gruntled and respecting pricing values. The largest relevant variable (when will CCP announce that they are doing something about it at a precise future date) is a complete unknown to me (might still be unknown for everybody else, but maybe not so completely), and the "success" of the variable above might very well influence it.
Assuming CCP does nothing until, say, next year or later, and assuming the OTEC is a near-total adoption success, it would be quite likely for all producible technetium to be safely unloaded at 250k, and not be unreasonable to see it do so even at 300k. The OTEC will be experiencing a rather high initial natural opposition, as most leftover stockpiles on non-participating members that are no longer extracting (but have inventory left) will be the first ones to be sold off (since they won't be respecting imposed price levels), but if they can manage to push though this "stockpile reallocation" period (non-members unloading stockpiles, members ending up with increasing unsold inventory) which might take anywhere from a couple of days to a couple of months, the increased income levels (even in case not all stocks get sold off in a timely manner) for participants will solidify its cohesion and have a low chance of being dethroned by anything other than impending CCP gameplay changes. As the price of technetium remains semi-artificially-high, the backwards pressure from lowering T2 item trade volume will slowly but eventually push the rest of the moon minerals towards devaluation, with everything else lowering to "barely worth it" levels (think neodymium at well under 10k, dyspro at under 5k, prom under 3k, most others under 1k) in a matter of months, slowly trending even lower than that, also bringing the profitability of reaction towers down on average, which will have an effect of lowering fuel block usage, but that effect will be noticeably less pronounced.
Of course, it's fairly uncertain whether the cat-herding necessary for the proper establishment of the OTEC can even be pulled off, and in case it can, it's quite likely that CCP might swoop in with a knee-jerk reaction and change something a bit ahead of schedule. So, again, too many variables (and too many "political" in nature) for anything that can resemble a decent prediction to be possible. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
189
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 04:57:00 -
[75] - Quote
That's a lot of words to say "It will go as high as we can damn well get it to go before CCP finally steps in". |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
651
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 06:34:00 -
[76] - Quote
corestwo wrote:That's a lot of words to say "It will go as high as we can damn well get it to go before CCP finally steps in".
I thought I and my T.A. were the only ones criticized for walls of texts 
But yes, if your trading strategy is buy and hold you'll always have the problem of how long to hold.
As Strat's eye opening Dr. Joe says,
Q GÇ£How do you know when to stop buying?GÇ¥
A On the same fax was his handwritten reply, GÇ£When it stops going up.GÇ¥
Q So I wrote on it, GÇ£How do you know when it stops going up?GÇ¥
A His handwritten reply, GÇ£When it starts going down.GÇ¥
Q So I wrote on it, GÇ£How do you know when it stops going up and starts going down?GÇ¥
A His handwritten reply, GÇ£When people start selling.GÇ¥
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
27
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 06:42:00 -
[77] - Quote
The Largo Embargo is strong with the goons and friends..
All null mats will be going up up and away.. and then fall like a rock, not as ccp steps in, but as they will most likely be motivated to up prioritize some changes before others..
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
651
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 06:47:00 -
[78] - Quote
Caleb Ayrania wrote:The Largo Embargo is strong with the goons and friends..
All null mats will be going up up and away.. and then fall like a rock, not as ccp steps in, but as they will most likely be motivated to up prioritize some changes before others..
I don't see it as a bad thing. The moons are there to be taken. If people don't feel pressed enough to go there and fight for them it's because they don't want or don't deserve them enough. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Liberty Eternal
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
58
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 06:59:00 -
[79] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: I don't see it as a bad thing. The moons are there to be taken. If people don't feel pressed enough to go there and fight for them it's because they don't want or don't deserve them enough.
Come on, you can't seriously expect the remaining 95% of EVE players to take the game as seriously as the goons do? We can't kill that which has no life  |

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
61
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 07:52:00 -
[80] - Quote
The point is, when is game is going to be devaluated because of missing fun, CCP will do something about that. And when CCP's system isn't ready, they will do something stupid to solve the situation fast.
I don't see a reason why should there be a roof for tech ? It's CCP's fault to provide a limited ressource to a raising player amount. For reaction POS owners with a high liquidity it's good news, because their concurrents can't pay the next tech batch for the towers. I believe tech is going up to 300k in the mid term.
Don't complain about Goons. They do what everyone with a little bit capitalistic instinct had done. And yes, the military power of Goons will be superior, because they can afford it and others can't. Economical power translates into military power. And as everyone of you could read on EVENews,. they initiated a program for Tengus. They allready have programs for supercarrier and Titans. Well done Mittani. |
|

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
113
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 09:09:00 -
[81] - Quote
I dont think it's as unreasonable to form a cartel as one might think; sure you have to overcome the "establishment opposition" of non complaint members, but especially for the goons, they dont exactly need the Tech money, its just the icing on the cake. Also, while your average goon couldnt even conceive of something like this, there are certainly some brilliant minds at the head of the goon swarm who are undoubtedly playing the long game.
Cartels have been formed around harder to control things with less profit guarantee, just look at the Alloyed Tritanium Bar cartell of 2009 |

papamike
Precipice Industries
23
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 10:54:00 -
[82] - Quote
Liberty Eternal wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: I don't see it as a bad thing. The moons are there to be taken. If people don't feel pressed enough to go there and fight for them it's because they don't want or don't deserve them enough.
Come on, you can't seriously expect the remaining 95% of EVE players to take the game as seriously as the goons do? We can't kill that which has no life 
I remember 2007-8 Goons saying much the same thing about BoB. We all thought it was impossible back then because of similar reasons why people think Goons are invincible now, right from "they're too big/powerful ingame" to "CCP bankrolls them". Perhaps out of the ashes of that intergalactic space-nerd empire rose an even more demented beast, but I doubt it is invincible.
Remember "If it bleeds, we can kill it" |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
247
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 12:47:00 -
[83] - Quote
CCP attempted to fix dyspro and are intending to fix tech because it makes for ****** gameplay IN NULLSEC; it has nothing to do with the overall price of goods or some amorphous "breaking the economy" concern.
As to the "cartel", demand is basically fixed up to an unknown price point, after which it will decline slowly with price as certain ships become replaceable with t1 or t3 variants. I am supremely confident that we haven't yet reached that point. What the cartel does is allow them to search out the general area of that point by collectively testing new price points instead of flooding the market every time the market starts pushing to a new price point. Instead of having to clear the market three times for every 10k pu jump, you can just jump it 10s of ks at a time, somewhat confident that the other suppliers will coordinate with you to wait and see if the new price point sticks.
The result is just a faster rise to an inevitable equilibrium, skipping dozens of lengthy and tedious ups and downs that an undirected market-driven process would take. It is, in essence, speculation at its finest. Also, as someone who has recently ridden the mu8ltiple ups and downs to make 20% on every 10% rise: **** you, assholes. |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1061
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 14:07:00 -
[84] - Quote
corestwo wrote:That's a lot of words to say "It will go as high as we can damn well get it to go before CCP finally steps in". You can't have missed the "too complicated" bit in the post though :) It was basically "I can't tell you for sure, but if you INSIST on an answer, here is my best GUESS for now, and what can happen to make that guess end up being wrong" (easily verifiable possible events).
Well, yes, the gist of it might have been that "it will go as high as possible until CCP stops it". However, it contained some hints as to how high that max value might reasonably be so that internal OTEC "friendly" same-price time-of-placement competition would not make it self-destruct in the long run. And a warning that this will probably make CCP act sooner. Also it contained the reasoning behind what else might happen until that time that CCP decides to intervene (what else goes down and why plus a very rough estimate of about how much). http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

Go2
Nexus Advanced Technologies Fidelas Constans
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 20:29:00 -
[85] - Quote
Akita T wrote:corestwo wrote:That's a lot of words to say "It will go as high as we can damn well get it to go before CCP finally steps in". You can't have missed the "too complicated" bit in the post though :) It was basically "I can't tell you for sure, but if you INSIST on an answer, here is my best GUESS for now, and what can happen to make that guess end up being wrong" (easily verifiable possible events). Well, yes, the gist of it might have been that "it will go as high as possible until CCP stops it". However, it contained some hints as to how high that max value might reasonably be so that internal OTEC "friendly" same-price time-of-placement competition would not make it self-destruct in the long run. And a warning that this will probably make CCP act sooner. Also it contained the reasoning behind what else might happen until that time that CCP decides to intervene (what else goes down and why plus a very rough estimate of about how much).
It sounds like you are saying that you think there is a point where in-game market manipulation will cause CCP to step in. Not just this specific instance, but in general.
Where do you think that line is ?
Assuming that OTEC is as successful as Goons want it to be and OTEC controls 80% of the Tech production in EVE, where do you think the breaking point is for CCP involvement ?
300k ? 400k ? 500k ?
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2945
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 20:59:00 -
[86] - Quote
I understand we've solidly broken the 200k barrier, with buys following.
:happysun: |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1061
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 21:41:00 -
[87] - Quote
Go2 wrote:It sounds like you are saying that you think there is a point where in-game market manipulation will cause CCP to step in. Not just this specific instance, but in general. Where do you think that line is ? The last time this happened (dysp/prom), they had just barely broken past 200k, they were NOT heavily regionalized, and Dominion included heavy reshuffling of stuff to make them less valuable (in the process setting the stage for this current SNAFU). I'd say CCP is already well past the "we should really do something about it" threshold if the price level is succesfully maintained. The question is only whether they have learned enough from the last time to know better than knee-jerk too much in the opposite extreme, what they might have partially planned to address this already, and how soon they could implement it safely. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T
http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

cuoredipietra famedoro
The Cognitive Faction Permanent Transience
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 21:57:00 -
[88] - Quote
since CCP hinted @ ring mining moon goo during FF, I wouldn't be suprised of seeing technetium price taking a dive at some point in the future.
And, like Akita said, it is likely that CCP is already aware of the problem and working of it.
Not that i don't like seeing cartels arise in New Eden (nice move goonies), but i like cartel's tears more.
Caeci caecos ducentes-á |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
192
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 22:08:00 -
[89] - Quote
Asking someone to predict CCP's actions based on the players is like asking someone to predict what God will do. In this context, God actually exists, but that doesn't make predicting Its actions any easier.
The only definitive statement I'd be willing to make is that technetium will drop in price in the future and this drop in price will coincide with, at the very earliest, the announcement of a firm date for the introduction of ring mining. |

cuoredipietra famedoro
The Cognitive Faction Permanent Transience
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 22:13:00 -
[90] - Quote
corestwo wrote:Asking someone to predict CCP's actions based on the players is like asking someone to predict what God will do. In this context, God actually exists, but that doesn't make predicting Its actions any easier.
The only definitive statement I'd be willing to make is that technetium will drop in price in the future and this drop in price will coincide with, at the very earliest, the announcement of a firm date for the introduction of ring mining.
Absolutely agree on this. The cartel was a nice move anyway. Caeci caecos ducentes-á |
|

Smartacus
Guys With Strippers
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 21:36:00 -
[91] - Quote
Does anyone know what is the general assumed amount of Tech moons in the game ?
Currently there is only just around 600k units of Tech on sell orders in Jita. While the recent daily amount bought is around 1M units.
It seems to me a single person with some isk can completely play this market, which is probably happening too i would guess.
Some other thought that crossed my mind.
Lets say : Cartel of alliances controls all tech in game. Decide to completely stop selling tech to jita market Hereby reserving T2 ships for alliances only.
|

OllieNorth
Recidivists Incorporated
175
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 21:48:00 -
[92] - Quote
I like that thought. The idea of a player group significantly affecting EVE-wide play is pretty awesome. I hope they don't hit it with the nerf-bat too quickly. Now, I like the idea of eventual ring-mining so that we can have SOME T2 ships around, but I really enjoy watching everything move in unusual directions. |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1061
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 23:55:00 -
[93] - Quote
Smartacus wrote:Does anyone know what is the general assumed amount of Tech moons in the game ? A minimum of around 230 publicly known locations (552k/day). A distant past estimate of most likely actual count of around 360-380 (864k-912k/day). A still borderline believable maximum moon count of around 450-480 (1.08m-1.15m/day).
The overwhelming vast majority of raw technetium trade happens in Jita. A high portion of it used to be sold raw to buy orders without being reacted by the extractor. A noteworthy percentage of it is later resold raw at a higher price by whoever purchased it without intention to react. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T
http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

Sensei Cohiba
LaFrege Traders Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 06:50:00 -
[94] - Quote
I can confirm that ncdot leadership channels have instructed their corps to not list for below 199kpu.
|

Smartacus
Guys With Strippers
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 11:18:00 -
[95] - Quote
Interesting.
Also tnx Akita. |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1062
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 00:53:00 -
[96] - Quote
Sensei Cohiba wrote:I can confirm that ncdot leadership channels have instructed their corps to not list for below 199kpu. Why not 300k just for lulz ?  http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T
http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
210
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 02:04:00 -
[97] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Sensei Cohiba wrote:I can confirm that ncdot leadership channels have instructed their corps to not list for below 199kpu. Why not 300k just for lulz ? 
NCdot threw in the towel against us and so we magnanimously left them five moons.
Their supply is not exactly what one might call "significant" as a result. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
264
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 04:00:00 -
[98] - Quote
Looks like the bottom is ready to fall out of tech and derivatives.
Suppliers ramping the price up is based on a game of chicken between themselves and the buyers to see who will give in first. While sellers as a cartel have an advantage of being able to coordinate, I think the Jita weekend may have played the buyers' hand for them, and people just decided to skip buying high priced tech and derivatives from an occupied Jita. Where they may have individually accepted the new price range set and raced to be the first to cash in on rising t2 prices, they instead collectively faced the same disincentives of high prices and gank risk.
I'd like to see it fall just because it would create a new decision dynamic in the cartel, where now you have to consider internal and external reputation of the cartel in terms of effectiveness. It will be interesting either way though. |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
231
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 04:17:00 -
[99] - Quote
Your argument, or what appears to be your argument, is that the reduced volume as a result of burn jita somehow broke the back of the cartel.
This argument might hold more water if the reduced volume hadn't been in effect across almost the entire market.  |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
264
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 04:55:00 -
[100] - Quote
Except the entire market wasn't in a similar stare-down over purposefully and publicly ramped-up prices.
I'll reread it in the morning, but it seems pretty clear and simple to me, whether you agree or not aside. |
|

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1073
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 05:05:00 -
[101] - Quote
So basically, cartel plans were delayed a few days ? :) http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T
http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

Liberty Eternal
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
71
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 06:23:00 -
[102] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:Looks like the bottom is ready to fall out of tech and derivatives.
Cracks are showing in many markets but with all the recent noise it is difficult to know what to think of it. With a bit of luck we will see a hilarious parallel of the morphite debacle. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
267
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 11:18:00 -
[103] - Quote
Yup, I'm far from doomcalling here. I just wanted to point out that in what is largely a psychological game internally and externally, the burn jita event may have made it significantly easier for buyers not to accept a new higher price range and similarly harder for cartel members to not begin to doubt, distrust or outright cheat.
I know eve-o gets a lot of knee-jerk anti-goon comments, but this is far from that. I'm just hopeful because a tougher ride for price control efforts just makes for a more interesting subject and volatile price. |

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 02:29:00 -
[104] - Quote
2 words
Ring Mining
Deal with IT. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
267
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 03:07:00 -
[105] - Quote
One question
When? |

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 06:27:00 -
[106] - Quote
I examined the amount of traded tech in Jita and the trend is clear. The actual traded amount of tech is 20% lower than in the best times. (10day avg) The cartel is working until now, but stockpiling is ongoing. I examined the traded amount of nanotranistors too and even this went down. Actually since the price went up to 10k ISK the amount of traded nanotransistors went rapidly down as well as the tech.
There are maybe 3 causes for this:
1) The high prices on T1 minerals is lowering the demand for T2 too 2) The high price on tech is lowering the demand for T2 3) The high price on tech isn't for many reaction pos owners affordable. They haven't the liquidity
What do you think?
|

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
313
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 16:42:00 -
[107] - Quote
Idk exactly when the market will stop clearing, but I am supremely confident that every unit produced will still be consumed at 200k pu, and all we`re seeing is fluctuations associated with the big change engineered by the cartel.
That said, for the first time in a long time I do not have a good `feel`for what`s going on in the market, and am currently waiting to see how things play out before I make another market move, if I make another market move. I see a lot of downward pressure on nanos and tech itself, but sellers of raw tech are showing surprising discipline in not chasing the price of raw tech back down.
It will be an interesting week or two watching how it all plays out. |

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 22:26:00 -
[108] - Quote
The amount of sold tech per day is lowering. The level for a 10d avg is at 750k per day. Nanotransistors have a better future. The total size of all buy orders is much greater than the total size of all sell orders and the amount of traded Nanotransistors is raising.
That is good news for Tech moon owners. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
343
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 22:48:00 -
[109] - Quote
Generally lower tech volume can just mean more being reacted directly by primary producers, which is more plausible the longer the moons are held by the same alliance like we have had for a long time.
I don't put much stock in the daily volume of tech. The daily volume of nanos and fullerieds, on the other had, are still as relevant as they always were.
Again, I'm not saying I know either way right now, I just don;t think that's a valid way to analyze the situation. |

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 07:16:00 -
[110] - Quote
It doesn't matter where the tech is processed. In the end it's the total market value that gives you the profit. And when nanotransistors don't give an noticeable additional profit because of the tower and transport cost, moon goo owners will not do it. |
|

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
351
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 12:45:00 -
[111] - Quote
Nomad I wrote:It doesn't matter where the tech is processed. In the end it's the total market value that gives you the profit. And when nanotransistors don't give an noticeable additional profit because of the tower and transport cost, moon goo owners will not do it.
nonresponsive
|

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.16 20:53:00 -
[112] - Quote
Is the cartel already failing?
|

Black Madness
Natural Born Builders
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 04:41:00 -
[113] - Quote
TornSoul wrote:Is the cartel already failing?
Goons tired to take care of tech ? |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 13:27:00 -
[114] - Quote
It's a standoff between buyers accepting the new price and sellers maintaining it. Theoretically it's easier for the smaller number of sellers to collude to fix the price, and so far they've managed to stay firm.
However, there is a lot of pressure building up in raw tech, and while time is on the side of the cartel, it does constantly wear away at their collusion. Buyers will eventually accept the new price, if the cartel doesn't crack first.
I have noticed somebody coming by to clear out the sells below 200k pu, so if you're a primary producer who needs quick cash, just list at 199999.99 instead of selling to a buy order, and whomever is keeping the price nice and tidy will scoop it up from you. |

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 08:47:00 -
[115] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:It's a standoff between buyers accepting the new price and sellers maintaining it. Theoretically it's easier for the smaller number of sellers to collude to fix the price, and so far they've managed to stay firm.
However, there is a lot of pressure building up in raw tech, and while time is on the side of the cartel, it does constantly wear away at their collusion. Buyers will eventually accept the new price, if the cartel doesn't crack first.
I have noticed somebody coming by to clear out the sells below 200k pu, so if you're a primary producer who needs quick cash, just list at 199999.99 instead of selling to a buy order, and whomever is keeping the price nice and tidy will scoop it up from you.
Confirmed. Some sellers doing their bussiness not at the OTEC conditions. If this continues, the OTEC will be soon history. |

De Guillaume
APEX ARDENT COALITION Persona Non Gratis
266
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 12:37:00 -
[116] - Quote
you wants intersting, i was checking out my assets and just found I have about 6b isk worth of tec , that being what it was valued when i first got it, if i remember correctly, whatever is pushing the prices higher, cheers, keep it up
the only issue is its in 00 space. mmm
fyi, everyone not in the cartle should all gang up and take it from them. so unfair they hold pretty much all of the tec, i am jealous :} |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
29
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 17:37:00 -
[117] - Quote
it seems we broke the t2 market entirely by jacking up the prices from 120k to 200k in three months
oops |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
29
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 17:38:00 -
[118] - Quote
like most t2 stuff is hilariously underpriced now the shock just keeps slowly rippling through and we're going to see a sudden shortage of t2 stuff in a little while |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
331
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 17:42:00 -
[119] - Quote
yeah, even the "my time is free" pubbies that exist in abundance in the invention markets can recognize when they're literally losing money on invention.
I mean, probably. |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 17:44:00 -
[120] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:like most t2 stuff is hilariously underpriced now the shock just keeps slowly rippling through and we're going to see a sudden shortage of t2 stuff in a little while
That's exactly it. People all down the line say "**** it, I'm not paying for that", but they eventually will, at least at ~200k pu. Just a matter of who cracks first, buyers or sellers.
Interesting times. |
|

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1100
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 17:51:00 -
[121] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:Just a matter of who cracks first, buyers or sellers. More like, who will crack first, and who second, buyers, sellers or CCP  I'm thinking buyers first, CCP second  http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
331
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 17:58:00 -
[122] - Quote
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if CCP takes the stance of "Well, we ****ed it up once before, but now we have ring mining in the pipeline and that'll shake it up, so lets just wait for that".
I guess not doing anything until ring mining would result in CCP cracking second though. |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1100
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 18:04:00 -
[123] - Quote
corestwo wrote:I guess not doing anything until ring mining would result in CCP cracking second though. Bingo.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 18:13:00 -
[124] - Quote
corestwo wrote:Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if CCP takes the stance of "Well, we ****ed it up once before, but now we have ring mining in the pipeline and that'll shake it up, so lets just wait for that".
I guess not doing anything until ring mining would result in CCP cracking second though.
Agreed.
I will admit nullsec is a little more tech crazy at 200k pu, but it's just an exaggeration of what we saw at 100k pu, not a fundamental difference. On the general economy side, there is nothing game-breaking about 200k or even 300k pu tech. People will pay for t2 stuff until the point that they won't, and then the price will stabilize.
There's just nothing that can happen that can make tech more "broken" than it already has been for over a year, so I highly doubt anything will happen to change CCP's established schedule for a t2 revamp. |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
30
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 19:00:00 -
[125] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:like most t2 stuff is hilariously underpriced now the shock just keeps slowly rippling through and we're going to see a sudden shortage of t2 stuff in a little while That's exactly it. People all down the line say "**** it, I'm not paying for that", but they eventually will, at least at ~200k pu. Just a matter of who cracks first, buyers or sellers. Interesting times. it's actually making me consider just going **** it and reacting the stuff all the way down the line, so our attempts to jack the price don't get muffled by reactors |

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.05.19 08:43:00 -
[126] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:SetrakDark wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:like most t2 stuff is hilariously underpriced now the shock just keeps slowly rippling through and we're going to see a sudden shortage of t2 stuff in a little while That's exactly it. People all down the line say "**** it, I'm not paying for that", but they eventually will, at least at ~200k pu. Just a matter of who cracks first, buyers or sellers. Interesting times. it's actually making me consider just going **** it and reacting the stuff all the way down the line, so our attempts to jack the price don't get muffled by reactors
It's looking like the goons are getting f****** by one of the opponents. The price for Nanotransistors is at a level paying just the fuel costs. So even when you process the stuff self, the prices are down. I curious how long does it take before a crash sends tech to 160k |

Tobiaz
Spacerats
442
|
Posted - 2012.05.20 00:10:00 -
[127] - Quote
corestwo wrote:Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if CCP takes the stance of "Well, we ****ed it up once before, but now we have ring mining in the pipeline and that'll shake it up, so lets just wait for that".
I guess not doing anything until ring mining would result in CCP cracking second though. A pipeline several years long though.
A band-aid in the meantime would be adding moongoo to W-space moons. Not so much that it's actually worth fighting over, but enough to function as a pressure valve on OTEC shenanigans. So maybe give W-moons only 5% yield of K-moons in null or something.
Though I'll admit: I think OTEC is hilarious. Make Empire squirm, it will be magnificent. T2 mods are too common these days anyway, I'd wish CCP hadn't removed the level 5 skill requirements on them.
Year-old newbies flying T3 ships with full T2 fittings, all paid for with risk-free Incursions... it's just killing the achievement of player progression. No wonder even newer players complain getting bored, flying around in 'endgame' ships and mods. Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!-á Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors! |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.05.20 17:37:00 -
[128] - Quote
Nomad I wrote: It's looking like the goons are getting f****** by one of the opponents. The price for Nanotransistors is at a level paying just the fuel costs. So even when you process the stuff self, the prices are down. I curious how long does it take before a crash sends tech to 160k
yeah, hence why i want to be able to directly manipulate nano prices instead of having to deal with them as a muffling agent
issue is we haven't just ruined nano profitability we've made tons of t2 stuff unprofitable to make |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3882
|
Posted - 2012.05.21 14:10:00 -
[129] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:corestwo wrote:Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if CCP takes the stance of "Well, we ****ed it up once before, but now we have ring mining in the pipeline and that'll shake it up, so lets just wait for that".
I guess not doing anything until ring mining would result in CCP cracking second though. A pipeline several years long though. A band-aid in the meantime would be adding moongoo to W-space moons. Not so much that it's actually worth fighting over or putting POS on all moons in W-space, but enough to function as a pressure valve on OTEC shenanigans. So give W-moons only maybe 5% yield of K-moons in null or something? Though I'll admit: I think OTEC is hilarious. They'll have my blessing if they can make Empire squirm, it will be magnificent. T2 mods are too common these days anyway, I'd wish CCP hadn't removed the level 5 skill requirements on them. Year-old newbies flying T3 ships with full T2 fittings, all paid for with risk-free Incursions... it's just killing the achievement of player progression. No wonder even newer players complain getting bored, flying around in 'endgame' ships and mods.
I'm going to go ahead and guess that 0.0/low consume the lions share of T2 products.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1100
|
Posted - 2012.05.21 22:41:00 -
[130] - Quote
Spreadsheet (updated prices) : http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1205/EVE_reactions_v4f.zip Most important part image snapshot : http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1205/react220512.gif
Looks to me like fullerides are the best damn thing to react right now even with the current prices, hypersinaptic fibers second best, with nanotransistors and ferrogel nearly tied to 3rd place best things to react (ferrogel is slightly better, but not by very much).
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |
|

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
338
|
Posted - 2012.05.21 22:47:00 -
[131] - Quote
If I were to say, "wow, that isn't a whole lot of profit", I would be correct? |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1100
|
Posted - 2012.05.21 22:59:00 -
[132] - Quote
That's per tower. A fullerides chain would normally have 3 large gallente towers, or 2 large and 2 mediums. Not sure what the best sov fuel bonus is, but IIRC it's another -20%, right ? So a complete fullerides chain with best faction towers running in a max sov fuel bonus area would give you an extra 1.54 bil ISK/month compared to dumping all the materials on the market. Also, considering that you're probably not usually mining sylicates and hydrocarbons usually even if you probably can find those things quite easily in the area (but you'd be either making or importing carbon polymers anyway, so might as well pick a moon that has both and plop the first step tower on it, since a silo and a miner eat up the same CPU/grid anyway), that's actually 1.62 bil/month extra (yeah, negligible extra, but, eh).
So... YOU tell me... is it worth it or not ? ;) Probably not, but some might argue it is, at least for them. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1100
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 03:42:00 -
[133] - Quote
It's almost funny how people were clamoring to the idea that CCP will "save them" by "nerfing tech" in the Inferno expansion    With another psychological hurdle down range, I guess the emerging cartel has now quite a bit of free time (until this autumn, the very least) to work their magic.  Go, go, gadget technetium to 250k !  http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
340
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 05:08:00 -
[134] - Quote
Yeah, we can't push it all that much further right now until people accept the price and demand picks back up.  |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1100
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 05:14:00 -
[135] - Quote
Well, reacting tech is still decently profitable compared to reacting just about everything else, so I'd say prices were quite well accepted already with minimal reactor losses. Volumes of purchased T2 ships has not dropped significantly either, with a few exceptions that are not of much concern right now. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 07:57:00 -
[136] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Go, go, gadget technetium to 250k ! 
Oh, look at this! Akita is going to be a bad goon copy. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
857
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 08:46:00 -
[137] - Quote
Little objection.
In order to make Tech go up, you have to sell less of it. Moons don't stop producing it though, so everybody in the cartel starts getting massive amounts of unsold stock.
Summer is coming, that is when demand drops and prices usually go down.
So, how are you going to convince all the cartel partecipants to not dump?
How is it more profitable selling X units at 250k when you could sell X * 3 at 150k? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 13:14:00 -
[138] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:In order to make Tech go up, you have to sell less of it.
not necessarily
for almost 2 years now the tech price has been determined by the daily extraction + existing stockpiles from when it wasn't being consumed at full capacity. as stockpiles have effectively dried up and general demand has risen significantly just in the last few months, we are now going through the process of determining the actual highest market-clearing price where output meets demand. the decline in t2 consumed all down the line is a just a temporary adjustment to the massive price shock, which should mellow over time. this is, of course, speculation, but no one has yet put forth any kind of analysis to indicate that 80k, 100k, 150k, or 200k pu was the actual highest full capacity market-clearing price, though that obviously leaves it open to debate.
all the cartel has done is try to guess and test where that point is collectively, instead of letting the market move to that point in a more meandering and organic process. they are, in essence, speculating on with their own primary product.
in the real world speculators would just sit down and do the fundamental analysis necessary to estimate where the market clearing price will be, but that doesn't appeal to the vast majority of people in a video game, so just setting prices and seeing what happens is far more fun.
my guess is the result will be a sort of market-driven/cartel-directed hybrid, where they will set a price, and then it will stabilize at 50-75% of the difference in price gain, repeated until the highest market-clearing price is eventually reached. where that price is, nobody has so far produced a compelling argument; and if they have made one, they probably won;t share it. |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1100
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 13:45:00 -
[139] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:no one has yet put forth any kind of analysis to indicate that 80k, 100k, 150k, or 200k pu was the actual highest full capacity market-clearing price, though that obviously leaves it open to debate. Well, actually, going by late autumn 2009 (so, 3 years ago, when population levels were ever so slightly lower than today, but with less people T2-capable, and with ISK harder to earn, with GTC prices at about HALF of today's level, 280-300m/month) pre-dominion clearance levels, depending on exactly how many tech vs prom/dyspro moons there are (guesstimating a conservative number), shifting the bottleneck from a pair of minerals to a single mineral, assuming the market will accept AT LEAST similar prices (as opposed to higher, since ISK is easier to come by and more people are T2-capable due to passage of time), tech was very likely to reach at least 200k at the equilibrium point after stockpiles were gone BEFORE you take into account any of the other factors previously mentioned. Also consider that while existing stockpiles are indeed low, they're not quite gone yet, and this cartel price-fixing action effectively shifts most of the leftover stockpiles from speculators and old owners into current owner hands. All things considered, it would not be at all surprising if all newly extracted tech would still clear the market today even at 300k or maybe 350k once the full stockpile shift has happened and people resigned themselves to the new T2 ship price levels, if CCP does nothing until that point in time. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

Andre Vauban
Quantum Cats Syndicate
19
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 13:57:00 -
[140] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Little objection.
In order to make Tech go up, you have to sell less of it. Moons don't stop producing it though, so everybody in the cartel starts getting massive amounts of unsold stock.
Summer is coming, that is when demand drops and prices usually go down.
So, how are you going to convince all the cartel partecipants to not dump?
How is it more profitable selling X units at 250k when you could sell X * 3 at 150k?
But this is what is so amusing about OTEC. They don't care about making more isk. They are sitting on 100's of trillions of isk. They literally don't know what to do with all their isk. You are assuming they are playing the same game as you, they are not. They are doing this to mess with the rest of eve. |
|

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 14:04:00 -
[141] - Quote
yup, i'm basing my actions on similar back-of-the-envelope analysis; it is a very convincing argument
i just wanted to point out that there is no basis from which to privilege any of the past temporarily stable price points over any other, in my mind they are all still far beneath the point where people will permanently decrease the amount of t2 stuff they buy. |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 14:08:00 -
[142] - Quote
Andre Vauban wrote:But this is what is so amusing about OTEC. They don't care about making more isk. They are sitting on 100's of trillions of isk. They literally don't know what to do with all their isk. You are assuming they are playing the same game as you, they are not. They are doing this to mess with the rest of eve.
not really. not only can it all be banked for a possible future where income like this can't be achieved, but you have many small holders who can make good use of every single penny they get right now (all the smaller cfc holders, evoke, nc., solar, raiden). Basically the only two entities with more isk than they know what to do with are PL and goons, so you can reliably apply the basic precepts of rational actor models to otec behaviour. |

King Aires
Coffee Sipper's Club Biggby Coffee Fan Club
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 14:11:00 -
[143] - Quote
Akita T wrote:SetrakDark wrote:no one has yet put forth any kind of analysis to indicate that 80k, 100k, 150k, or 200k pu was the actual highest full capacity market-clearing price, though that obviously leaves it open to debate. Well, actually, going by late autumn 2009 (so, 3 years ago, when population levels were ever so slightly lower than today, but with less people T2-capable, and with ISK harder to earn, with GTC prices at about HALF of today's level, 280-300m/month) pre-dominion clearance levels, depending on exactly how many tech vs prom/dyspro moons there are (guesstimating a conservative number), shifting the bottleneck from a pair of minerals to a single mineral, assuming the market will accept AT LEAST similar prices (as opposed to higher, since ISK is easier to come by and more people are T2-capable due to passage of time), tech was very likely to reach at least 200k at the equilibrium point after stockpiles were gone BEFORE you take into account any of the other factors previously mentioned. Also consider that while existing stockpiles are indeed low, they're not quite gone yet, and this cartel price-fixing action effectively shifts most of the leftover stockpiles from speculators and old owners into current owner hands. All things considered, it would not be at all surprising if all newly extracted tech would still clear the market today even at 300k or maybe 350k once the full stockpile shift has happened and people resigned themselves to the new T2 ship price levels, if CCP does nothing until that point in time.
That is all nice, but average daily users is dead flat with aug-dec 2009 with jan-mar 2012 at just over 32k. Also T3 ships were only introduced a few short summer months before the Tech bottleneck. Also the FOTM is tier 3 BC's and T3 ships.
I really think you overestimate the average man's willingness to pay for T2 prices in pvp. If the price of T2 goes too high, no one will pvp with them, then there is little ship loss. I think VV is right in that to keep the price this high the "cartel" is going to have to sit on a crap load of Tech. Maybe that is their plan, to crash the market back to 10k when everyone else is planning on astronomical increases?! |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1100
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 14:20:00 -
[144] - Quote
Daily users is indeed at very similar levels, but as I mentioned, GTC/PLEX prices today are nearly double due to the fact ISK is easier to come by (incursions, PI, better ship loadouts, all agents easier to access and giving higher rewards) and the average "ISK earner" SP has gone up (alongside their expertise level). If anything, that is a strong indicator (not a guarantee, true) that people could accept actual T2 prices nearly double the previous levels if the tier3 BCs and T3 ships would not be an alternative at all at those price ranges. These are not a sufficiently good alternative at the old price ranges to justify an noteworthy usage volume shift from T2 ships to those others IMO, so price ranges are likely to go up at least a bit compared to back then, and with the old price ranges, tech at 200k is fairly certain to be the bottom stable price, not the top one. Again, not a certainty, but reasonable assumption. In case CCP does not do anything soon, of course. IMO, the main reason tech is not even higher is exactly this, the specter of the possibility that CCP might "do something soon" to "fix" it. In fact, it's only a matter of when and how much, not if. We're pretty sure CCP has something in the pipeline for it (ring mining, for instance). We just don't know when it will go live and how easy will it be to get the bottleneck stuff (vs non-bottleneck stuff). http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

King Aires
Coffee Sipper's Club Biggby Coffee Fan Club
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 17:26:00 -
[145] - Quote
Akita T wrote:"The Sky is almost certainly not going to fall on you tomorrow, unless of course God wills it to fall, then the sky is most certainly falling.
Way to give yourself an out there
btw, the price of Plex has only changed from its all time low in september 2009 of 275mil. For most of 2009 it was between 350 and 450mil and during fanfest it was spiking from manipulation.
So I don't see how your Plex is high = Tech can skyrocket theory works when the price of plex is not that out of line.
|

Llyandrian
Livestock Science Exchange
64
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 17:31:00 -
[146] - Quote
Seen a nice boost in T3 demand recently, perhaps this is the explanation. |

TornSoul
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
76
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:24:00 -
[147] - Quote
Akita T wrote: IMO, the main reason tech is not even higher is exactly this, the specter of the possibility that CCP might "do something soon" to "fix" it.
I have fond memories about the Tc "crash" when this was first announced. Tc dropped some 20%-25% in 5 days or so. Massive panic selling.
Oh btw, that was back when Tc was just breaking through 100K 
And look at it today 
|

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 21:48:00 -
[148] - Quote
I agree with Akita about the long run. T2 ships are just too integral to a lot of success in anything beyond small gangs, and price in Eve is generally not a huge issue. I'd be willing to buy up to 250k if I thought people were similarly ready to accept that price, after that point I'd need to see or do some fundamental analysis about t2 demand before I was willing to risk any more bets on the price.
That said, the current run up came at a particularly bad time and all signs point to an imminent collapse of the price over the short term. I am very excited because catching falling knives is one of the most thrilling elements of the market game. Best of luck to everyone. |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1100
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 23:30:00 -
[149] - Quote
King Aires wrote:Akita T wrote:"The Sky is almost certainly not going to fall on you tomorrow, unless of course God wills it to fall, then the sky is most certainly falling. Way to give yourself an out there More like "there are good odds that the sky will not fall in the next 4 months, but there's a decent chance it will fall in about 6 months, and it eventually has to fall either way ; we also don't know what the damage will be when it falls". But generally, yea, what you said. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
954
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 00:12:00 -
[150] - Quote
So, my dumb question was not that dumb after all, eh? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1104
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 00:16:00 -
[151] - Quote
Well, sure, 3*X at 150k is better than 1*X at 250k, but worse than 2*X at 250k, so the question is, exactly how many could you sell at which price levels ? http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
954
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 00:21:00 -
[152] - Quote
Well, more than the "3x 150k" etc., the question actually implied prices had no reason not to crash after a while.  Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1104
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 00:28:00 -
[153] - Quote
If the majority of tech extractors just decided "eh, screw it, we're only going to sell half our tech and use the rest internally or just sit on it", you can bet the stable price would be close to double of the stable price of selling it all, so they'd make about the same ISK but also have truckloads of leftover tech for internal use. But that would be extremely difficult to pull off. The simpler alternative is to just stick with a stable price they're happy with and wait it out until all stockpiles of non-extractors have been completely exhausted. Again, technetium traded volume has not shrunk radically from the days it used to cost less than 100k ISK per unit, so all in all, by sticking to a 200k price level, they'd eventually be the only sellers and still make more ISK even if they start getting stockpiles of their own. That's not easy to pull off either, due to the smaller producers being in urgent need of liquid funds, but far easier than the alternative. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

AnakieNine
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 03:03:00 -
[154] - Quote
Some people aren't in the cartel. Me included :)
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
969
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:04:00 -
[155] - Quote
Isn't it amazing how Technetium is religiously following trend lines I drawn months ago? (Feel free to check past charts). Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
344
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 01:25:00 -
[156] - Quote
careful now, VV, go too hard and you might chafe. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
971
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 05:58:00 -
[157] - Quote
corestwo wrote:careful now, VV, go too hard and you might chafe.
Don't worry, I always carry an healthy amount of Nanite Repair Paste  Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

AnakieNine
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 21:57:00 -
[158] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Isn't it amazing how Technetium is religiously following trend lines I drawn months ago? (Feel free to check past charts).
I missed them VV but based on history I bet my sell patterns roughly match your graphs.
|

El Geo
Pathfinders.
37
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 00:01:00 -
[159] - Quote
shame they arent doing it with neodymium aswell |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
977
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 00:24:00 -
[160] - Quote
AnakieNine wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Isn't it amazing how Technetium is religiously following trend lines I drawn months ago? (Feel free to check past charts). I missed them VV but based on history I bet my sell patterns roughly match your graphs.
I just posted updated graphs both on Technetium and Nanotransistors. I am sure you will be able and see what is going on in there. Notice the 2W pin bar on the Nanos weekly chart and thus its projected target. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |