| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Spc One
The Chodak Void Alliance
24
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 02:18:00 -
[211] - Quote
Lanasak wrote:death to incursions And death to worm holes.
 |

Apolyon I
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 02:31:00 -
[212] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Lol so his data shows the percentage of characters situated in whs, rather the number of players who run wh sites. And it also fails to display the percentage of characters that run incursions, rendering the entire dataset useless for making such a comparison.
Bravo Darth, bravo. And once again I reiterate: http://d35dgn2pdc8wsn.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/04.jpghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MZD6-vGQmshttp://twostep4csm.blogspot.com/2012/03/its-econmony-stupid.htmlhttp://d35dgn2pdc8wsn.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/06.jpgListen to Dr E you obviously haven't... he states in the writing of a graph the percentage of Eve doing incursion he also states the number of peeps living in WH's ( ergo the the number of people doing sites is less unless 100% of them are) . If you cannot connect the dots & do the math I suggest remedial algebra. So where are your numbers comming from ( oh wait there are no numbers so yours are straight outta your bum ) It would be nice if there was a published number of peeps doing WH sites but the numbers he provides just shows the people doing Incursion sites ( HI/LO/NULL ) vs the number living in WH space. I'd really be interested in seeing the ISK equivent of Moon goo & nano ribbons that are produced each month to see how much wealth faucets create for NULL & W-Space
nanoribbons and moongoo both are material faucets, you bear certainly dont have brain |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
341
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 02:36:00 -
[213] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:whining... Wormholes aren't getting nerfed, because the rewards are in line with the risks...
Deal with it.
Or cry more, your actually pretty entertaining in a "special" kind of way...
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
672
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 02:38:00 -
[214] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote: I'd really be interested in seeing the ISK equivent of Moon goo & nano ribbons that are produced each month to see how much wealth faucets create for NULL & W-Space
lol oh lord |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
160
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 02:44:00 -
[215] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:DarthNefarius wrote: I'd really be interested in seeing the ISK equivent of Moon goo & nano ribbons that are produced each month to see how much wealth faucets create for NULL & W-Space
lol oh lord
I know the ISK equivalent of these materials produced monthly must be STAGGERING! Pretty much every T2 module needs techtanium ( which is HUGE ) and every T3 ship needs nano ribbons ( pretty large ) To the whiners : CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally" |

Apolyon I
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 02:54:00 -
[216] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:DarthNefarius wrote: I'd really be interested in seeing the ISK equivent of Moon goo & nano ribbons that are produced each month to see how much wealth faucets create for NULL & W-Space
lol oh lord I know... my lord the ISK equivalent of these materials produced monthly must be STAGGERING!  Pretty much every T2 module needs techtanium ( which is HUGE ) and every T3 ship needs nano ribbons ( pretty large )
you jelly??
how about the huge pile of LP that incursion runners get?? |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
160
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 04:23:00 -
[217] - Quote
I'm still asking CCP: In the sanbox o Eve: What is Escalating in J-space (according to the features webpage & DEV blogs absolutely nuthin' ) & how are the peeps in Wormholes going to be swept up into the Inferno a month later? Only thing I hear WH'ers participating in Inferno is thowing gas onto the inflation fire with blue loot while bounties elsewhere get a 10% nerf. To the whiners : CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally" |

Bane Nucleus
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
21
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 04:34:00 -
[218] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:I'm still asking CCP: In the sanbox o Eve: What is Escalating in J-space (according to the features webpage & DEV blogs absolutely nuthin' ) & how are the peeps in Wormholes going to be swept up into the Inferno a month later? Only thing I hear WH'ers participating in Inferno is thowing gas onto the inflation fire with blue loot while bounties elsewhere get a 10% nerf.
You are either the most dense person in game, or you are trolling. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
635
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 09:42:00 -
[219] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Listen to Dr E you obviously haven't... he states in the writing of a graph the percentage of Eve doing incursion he also states the number of peeps living in WH's ( ergo the the number of people doing sites is less unless 100% of them are). This is kind of the point, you've clearly never run wormholes, yet have chosen to comment on them. The number of people running wormhole sites is not <= the number of people living in them.
People scan down sites in high sec, jump in and run c1/c2 wormholes in their drakes or overpriced tengus. Similarly, people scan down C3s in low sec and do the same, a lot of major null sec alliances scan down c5/c6 whs and have entire capital ops where they jump in and clear capital escalation sites. In fact recently I think -A- took over a few WH systems for this very purpose.
None of these people live in wormholes, they live in high sec, low sec and null sec, yet they likely contribute just as much to the total amount of blue loot farmed as any WH dweller. And this is why your stats are completely useless, because the number of people living in wormholes, which is hard to calculate accurately anyway, is not even remotely related to the number of people raiding wormholes for PvE content.
DarthNefarius wrote:If you cannot connect the dots & do the math I suggest remedial algebra. So where are your numbers comming from ( oh wait there are no numbers so yours are straight outta your bum ) It would be nice if there was a published number of peeps doing WH sites but the numbers he provides just shows the people doing Incursion sites ( HI/LO/NULL ) vs the number living in WH space. If you're talking about the graph showing the number of incursions runners that is fairly useless for your purposes for the reason stated above. But, assuming it was useful, that looks like ~17,000 people running incursions, right?
How many active subscribers does Eve online have? >400,000 as of last month? And 5.4% of them are in wormholes?
400,000 x 0.054 = 21,600
So there are 4,000 more people "living" in wormholes, than there are running incursions? Oh wow, and people raid WHs on top of that?
Now GTFO Darth and never try and use statistics to support your terrible ideas again.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Samillian
Moonshine Industries The Last Chancers.
118
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 10:34:00 -
[220] - Quote
You go on a lot about Incursions being nerfed and wormholes being left alone. You also wheel out a lot of dodgy statistics to try and prove your point but I don't see you doing a comparison of the relative risks and logistical difficulties between HiSec Incursions and wormhole dwelling.
I don't think you will ever do such a comparison, partly because it is obvious that you have never lived for any time in wormhole space but mainly I suspect because it would blow your argument out of the water.
Everyone gets nerfed sooner or later, live with it. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
342
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 14:36:00 -
[221] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:Listen to Dr E you obviously haven't... he states in the writing of a graph the percentage of Eve doing incursion he also states the number of peeps living in WH's ( ergo the the number of people doing sites is less unless 100% of them are). This is kind of the point, you've clearly never run wormholes, yet have chosen to comment on them. The number of people running wormhole sites is not <= the number of people living in them. People scan down sites in high sec, jump in and run c1/c2 wormholes in their drakes or overpriced tengus. Similarly, people scan down C3s in low sec and do the same, a lot of major null sec alliances scan down c5/c6 whs and have entire capital ops where they jump in and clear capital escalation sites. In fact recently I think -A- took over a few WH systems for this very purpose. None of these people live in wormholes, they live in high sec, low sec and null sec, yet they likely contribute just as much to the total amount of blue loot farmed as any WH dweller. And this is why your stats are completely useless, because the number of people living in wormholes, which is hard to calculate accurately anyway, is not even remotely related to the number of people raiding wormholes for PvE content. DarthNefarius wrote:If you cannot connect the dots & do the math I suggest remedial algebra. So where are your numbers comming from ( oh wait there are no numbers so yours are straight outta your bum ) It would be nice if there was a published number of peeps doing WH sites but the numbers he provides just shows the people doing Incursion sites ( HI/LO/NULL ) vs the number living in WH space. If you're talking about the graph showing the number of incursions runners that is fairly useless for your purposes for the reason stated above. But, assuming it was useful, that looks like ~17,000 people running incursions, right? How many active subscribers does Eve online have? >400,000 as of last month? And 5.4% of them are in wormholes? 400,000 x 0.054 = 21,600 So there are 4,000 more people "living" in wormholes, than there are running incursions? Oh wow, and people raid WHs on top of that? Now GTFO Darth and never try and use statistics to support your terrible ideas again. I wish there were a +10,000 for a post.
Darth, WH's don't need an "escalation" because we are as escalated as it gets (w/o Sov war). If you can't get it through your head, I suggest you stop using a ball-peen hammer to install your implants...
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |

Joe Skellington
13th Tribe of Kobol Expeditionary
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 14:49:00 -
[222] - Quote
OP is too dense and hard to read, or is it just me? -á-á |\__/|-á -á/ @ @ \ -á-á -á( > -¦ < )-á -á`-+-+x-½-½-¦ -á-á / O \ |

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
624
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 15:00:00 -
[223] - Quote
I now support buffing WH's by 10%. http://blog.beyondreality.se/Incursion-hose Remove all incursions from hisec |

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp Black Thorne Alliance
307
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 15:54:00 -
[224] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Incursions getting nerfed & drone alloys getting nerfed why are the blue loot NPC buy orders not getting nerfed to to help with the inflation?!?! The Pax Amarrian nerf was a good precendent of a NPC sell order which was balanced next the sleeper blue loot NPC buy order should be cut in the name of balance. A possible bounty 10% cut is being thrown around too by CCP Soundwave. Only one currenntly smelling like a rose is the Wormhole residents with the Escalation to Inferno. Lets have the current inflation mean the end fo Empire NPC's no longer being able to affford to buy sleeper crap (NPC buy orders) which is non ribbons (blue loot) which acually adds something to Eve & empire ( at least with Incursions Capsuleers are providing a service to Empire residents what has blueloot added to Empire's security? ) . LETS HAVE EVERYONE FEEL THE PAIN OF ESCALATING INFERNO[:!: A pox on EVERYONE'S house
W-Space is perfectly fine and working as intended. Its dangerous being there. Nothing is free, nothing is easy, nothing is safe, nothing is guaranteed. Venture there sometime you'll quickly see what I mean.  'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you.
~I fly spaceships~ |

Bane Necran
324
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 17:33:00 -
[225] - Quote
WHs are more dangerous and lack many conveniences 0.0 has. If you're looking for something to nerf, check out 0.0.
But nullbears are CCPs sacred cow. They'll never do anything to upset them. |

Bane Nucleus
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
23
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 21:30:00 -
[226] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Bane Nucleus wrote:Kirell wrote:I will confirm something for all of you that aren't aware of how much money you can make in wormholes.
I've been living ina C4 wormhole up until recently (I removed everything as I am leaving the game and sellign this char off ad I've recently sold several other chars) I was going to biomass but friends implored me not to mostly because they didn't want everything to go to waste. So to help them enjoy EVE more I'm giving everything away to them.
Anyways.
Wormholes are as someone in this thread stated, a fountain of isk.
In a C4 static C3 (C247) wormhole I could re-roll wormholes in a matter of minutes. I could then scan out a C3 quickly with a max skilled scanning char, and close/bubble any Wh's in that C3. I could run the sites with little to no risk. making approx 300 mil an hour with 3 characters.
The only risk - new Wh's opening up into the system I am running. EASY TO NEGATE just scan every sig, eliminate them (or write down the codes) keep a probe up in system that covers the entire system. watch for ne WH's while doing sleepers = EASY.
C4's I was making around 400 mil an hour using 3 chars - 1 in a carrier and 2 maelstroms. EASY.
C5's make EVEN MORE isk. But need at least 2 people flying 2 chars each totalling 4 tengu's. If you can escalate the sites then even better. You can make approx 500-700 mil an hour iN C5's.
And even with all these precautions, you will still get ganked at some point. Just the nature of the beast. We caught 3 tengus who did this same exact thing. Incoming wh's were bubbled and had mass put through them. It didn't save them. The point being is that incursions dont have any of these risks. You shouldn't be making as much as wormhole space. Lastly, Earl Gray tea is the best Tea. Earl Gray. Hot.
Well played. You may now proceed with the Picard maneuver |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
641
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 22:59:00 -
[227] - Quote
Bane Nucleus wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Tea. Earl Gray. Hot. Well played. You may now proceed with the Picard maneuver Fairly certain I just performed the Picard Maneuver on Darth's terrible statistics.
No known defense mother ******.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
160
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 07:10:00 -
[228] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:[quote=Bane Nucleus][quote=Simi Kusoni]Tea. Earl Gray. Hot.[/quote Well played. You may now proceed with the Picard maneuver[/quote Fairly certain I just performed the Picard Maneuver on Darth's terrible statistics No known defense mother ******.
lol I took 1 day off o Forums & Simi tries her hand in math & statistics [:roll: Bravo your 1 attempt at math was waaaaaaaaaay off. I'll let you stare at the numbers & come up with why ( hint stare at QEN's 2010 :) I did a little stat mining from some tweet & found some interesting numbers on wormhole jumps you should check it out... https://twitter.com/#!/CCP_Diagora but more to my point about the ISK faucet of WH's here's a few CCP stats from CCP_Diagoras "Sell-to-NPCs items from wormholes generated 346bn ISK yesterday. 10.43tn ISK in Feb 2012 total. 5:01 AM - 8 Mar 12 via web"
-+ Embed this Tweet "Sunday 19th Feb; 886bn spent on minerals, 619bn on battleships, 374bn sleeper components, 359bn composite materials, 339bn ice products. and a comparison versus Incursions faucet "Average payout for Incursion participants on the 1st of Feb was 169.5m ISK. 301.8bn payout total, 1,781 participants"
To be fair though I'll give you Feb 1st was a wednesday & both Feb 19th & March 11th were days on the weekend
I'm trying to extract actual sites being run from the NPC kills stats reported from CCP_Diagoras in his tweets but thats difficult... the numbers of Incursion runners is a easier stat from the way Incursion payout mechanism is set up If CCP_Diagoras threw out a stat of the numbers of ribbons were salvaged on a given day & were used or sold over a month that stat would be golden To the whiners : CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally" |

Apolyon I
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 07:15:00 -
[229] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:[quote=Bane Nucleus][quote=Simi Kusoni]Tea. Earl Gray. Hot.[/quote Well played. You may now proceed with the Picard maneuver[/quote Fairly certain I just performed the Picard Maneuver on Darth's terrible statistics No known defense mother ******. lol I took 1 day off o Forums & Simi tries her hand in math & statistics [:roll: Bravo your 1 attempt at math was waaaaaaaaaay off. I'll let you stare at the numbers & come up with why ( hint stare at QEN's 2010 :) I did a little stat mining from some tweet & found some interesting numbers on wormhole jumps you should check it out... https://twitter.com/#!/CCP_Diagora but more to my point about the ISK faucet of WH's here's a few CCP stats from CCP_Diagoras "Sell-to-NPCs items from wormholes generated 346bn ISK yesterday. 10.43tn ISK in Feb 2012 total. 5:01 AM - 8 Mar 12 via web" -+ Embed this Tweet "Sunday 19th Feb; 886bn spent on minerals, 619bn on battleships, 374bn sleeper components, 359bn composite materials, 339bn ice products. and a comparison versus Incursions faucet "Average payout for Incursion participants on the 1st of Feb was 169.5m ISK. 301.8bn payout total, 1,781 participants" To be fair though I'll give you Feb 1st was a wednesday & both Feb 19th & March 11th were days on the weekend I'm trying to extract actual sites being run from the NPC kills stats reported from CCP_Diagoras in his tweets but thats difficult... the numbers of Incursion runners is a easier stat from the way Incursion payout mechanism is set up If CCP_Diagoras threw out a stat of the numbers of ribbons were salvaged on a given day & were used or sold over a month that stat would be golden
gj making it unreadable, what a way to argue |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
641
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 08:53:00 -
[230] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:[quote=Bane Nucleus][quote=Simi Kusoni]Tea. Earl Gray. Hot.[/quote Well played. You may now proceed with the Picard maneuver[/quote Fairly certain I just performed the Picard Maneuver on Darth's terrible statistics No known defense mother ******. lol I took 1 day off o Forums & Simi tries her hand in math & statistics [:roll: Bravo your 1 attempt at math was waaaaaaaaaay off. I'll let you stare at the numbers & come up with why ( hint stare at QEN's 2010 :) I did a little stat mining from some tweet & found some interesting numbers on wormhole jumps you should check it out... https://twitter.com/#!/CCP_Diagora but more to my point about the ISK faucet of WH's here's a few CCP stats from CCP_Diagoras "Sell-to-NPCs items from wormholes generated 346bn ISK yesterday. 10.43tn ISK in Feb 2012 total. 5:01 AM - 8 Mar 12 via web" -+ Embed this Tweet "Sunday 19th Feb; 886bn spent on minerals, 619bn on battleships, 374bn sleeper components, 359bn composite materials, 339bn ice products. and a comparison versus Incursions faucet "Average payout for Incursion participants on the 1st of Feb was 169.5m ISK. 301.8bn payout total, 1,781 participants" To be fair though I'll give you Feb 1st was a wednesday & both Feb 19th & March 11th were days on the weekend I'm trying to extract actual sites being run from the NPC kills stats reported from CCP_Diagoras in his tweets but thats difficult... the numbers of Incursion runners is a easier stat from the way Incursion payout mechanism is set up If CCP_Diagoras threw out a stat of the numbers of ribbons were salvaged on a given day & were used or sold over a month that stat would be golden What is this I don't even.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Samillian
Moonshine Industries The Last Chancers.
118
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 08:56:00 -
[231] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:[quote=Bane Nucleus][quote=Simi Kusoni]Tea. Earl Gray. Hot.[/quote Well played. You may now proceed with the Picard maneuver[/quote Fairly certain I just performed the Picard Maneuver on Darth's terrible statistics No known defense mother ******. lol I took 1 day off o Forums & Simi tries her hand in math & statistics [:roll: Bravo your 1 attempt at math was waaaaaaaaaay off. I'll let you stare at the numbers & come up with why ( hint stare at QEN's 2010 :) I did a little stat mining from some tweet & found some interesting numbers on wormhole jumps you should check it out... https://twitter.com/#!/CCP_Diagora but more to my point about the ISK faucet of WH's here's a few CCP stats from CCP_Diagoras "Sell-to-NPCs items from wormholes generated 346bn ISK yesterday. 10.43tn ISK in Feb 2012 total. 5:01 AM - 8 Mar 12 via web" -+ Embed this Tweet "Sunday 19th Feb; 886bn spent on minerals, 619bn on battleships, 374bn sleeper components, 359bn composite materials, 339bn ice products. and a comparison versus Incursions faucet "Average payout for Incursion participants on the 1st of Feb was 169.5m ISK. 301.8bn payout total, 1,781 participants" To be fair though I'll give you Feb 1st was a wednesday & both Feb 19th & March 11th were days on the weekend I'm trying to extract actual sites being run from the NPC kills stats reported from CCP_Diagoras in his tweets but thats difficult... the numbers of Incursion runners is a easier stat from the way Incursion payout mechanism is set up If CCP_Diagoras threw out a stat of the numbers of ribbons were salvaged on a given day & were used or sold over a month that stat would be golden
While your at it compare player assets (ships / POSes and modules as well as the value of any cargos) lost to player action between wormholes and Incursions.
Oh wait....that might prove that there is far more risk to living in a wormhole and damage your argument. |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
160
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 10:46:00 -
[232] - Quote
Apolyon I wrote:
gj making it unreadable, what a way to argue
The forums parser ate a few brackets again I tried to fix it up a bit... forums ganks are not as bad as they used to be but they are still very annoying  To the whiners : CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally" |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
160
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 11:05:00 -
[233] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:Listen to Dr E you obviously haven't... he states in the writing of a graph the percentage of Eve doing incursion he also states the number of peeps living in WH's ( ergo the the number of people doing sites is less unless 100% of them are). This is kind of the point, you've clearly never run wormholes, yet have chosen to comment on them. The number of people running wormhole sites is not <= the number of people living in them..
I have it on good authority you are wrong there: there is alot of peeps living in WH's & doing non sleeper sites whom live in WH's the sleeper sites are the ISK fountain equivalent of Incursions are just as much an inflation multiplier as incursions ( yet still less then bounties ). I guess I should be more specific in differenting between blue loot & anonms & other sites that are non sleepers as part of my point about what should be nerfed so here: BOUNTIES. INCURSION PAYOUTS, & SLEEPER COMPONENTS are need o fixing in Escalation & Inferno. Incursion payouts will get the 10% cut next month CCP Sound wave sayz bounties are next, but sleeper components ( aka blue loot which are NPC buy orders ) are the third leg which is the great ISK inflation fountain should be cut along with everything else before more sinks are introduced IMHO. To the whiners : CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally" |

melanomma
Atrium Geographical
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 11:34:00 -
[234] - Quote
I'd like to see a chart of inflation over the past two years , I would bet that once Incursions started that shortly after inflation started to rise more . You will also see spikes around the time of pi changes and goons attack on the ice market. Ive never done incursions but i know pple that do and they can make more isk a day than i do in a week farming a wh. |

seany1212
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
138
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 12:43:00 -
[235] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:Listen to Dr E you obviously haven't... he states in the writing of a graph the percentage of Eve doing incursion he also states the number of peeps living in WH's ( ergo the the number of people doing sites is less unless 100% of them are). This is kind of the point, you've clearly never run wormholes, yet have chosen to comment on them. The number of people running wormhole sites is not <= the number of people living in them.. I have it on good authority you are wrong there: there is alot of peeps living in WH's & doing non sleeper sites whom live in WH's the sleeper sites are the ISK fountain equivalent of Incursions are just as much an inflation multiplier as incursions ( yet still less then bounties ). I guess I should be more specific in differenting between blue loot & anonms & other sites that are non sleepers as part of my point about what should be nerfed so here: BOUNTIES. INCURSION PAYOUTS, & SLEEPER COMPONENTS are need o fixing in Escalation & Inferno. Incursion payouts will get the 10% cut next month CCP Sound wave sayz bounties are next, but sleeper components ( aka blue loot which are NPC buy orders ) are the third leg which is the great ISK inflation fountain should be cut along with everything else before more sinks are introduced IMHO.
You are delusional, not only do you link math that is BASED on some CCP stats and may well be wrong but you assume that every ISK that is payed out if those stats were correct is stored in every wormholers wallets. The losses in ISK in wormhole space reflect the payouts, entire alliances being evicted from wormhole systems, t3 and cap fleets being destroyed near on a daily basis both by other players or even just miscalculations with sleepers. The 40+ billion ISK chimera loss a couple of months ago proves my point.
Now looking to incursions payouts on those stats, assuming that at least 75% of that payout is in high sec incursions, where is the risk vs. reward?
Kind of shooting yourself in the foot their, especially as I saw you flying around high yesterday in a bhaalgorn, seems a bit hypocritical considering their is no risk...  |

Just Alter
Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
23
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:14:00 -
[236] - Quote
Wormholes are fine as they are.
If anything they should be more lucrative, especially c5 and c6.
The risk involved is immense and at the end of the day, incursions are still better. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
641
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:19:00 -
[237] - Quote
Just Alter wrote:Wormholes are fine as they are.
If anything they should be more lucrative, especially c5 and c6.
The risk involved is immense and at the end of the day, incursions are still better. Personally I've always found it odd c1/c2 wormholes hold so little value, they are essentially just as dangerous as c3s, perhaps more so due to players that scan them down out of high sec and watch the API stats to see when someone is killing NPCs in there.
Either way though, whs in general are perfectly balanced, and probably one of the best parts of the game at the moment. They're certainly the most dangerous.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |

Ishaki
Caldari Prime Investments
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:20:00 -
[238] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote: more stats concerning of the numbers of ribbons that were salvaged on a given day & were used or sold over a month
What does nanoribbons have to do with inflation? They are materials that are sold on the market and move money from your wallet to mine.. they do not add isk to the economy.
Are you sure you aren't the same poster who goes in to every thread where a bpo is mentioned regardless of the actual topic and spouts nonsense about how unfair they are, because your argument sounds just like his. |

Just Alter
Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
23
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:35:00 -
[239] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Just Alter wrote:Wormholes are fine as they are.
If anything they should be more lucrative, especially c5 and c6.
The risk involved is immense and at the end of the day, incursions are still better. Personally I've always found it odd c1/c2 wormholes hold so little value, they are essentially just as dangerous as c3s, perhaps more so due to players that scan them down out of high sec and watch the API stats to see when someone is killing NPCs in there. Either way though, whs in general are perfectly balanced, and probably one of the best parts of the game at the moment. They're certainly the most dangerous.
Yeah they're the most dangerous.
However when thinking about these kind of things you have to think like this: "how can something be exploited?".
If c1 and c2 were more lucrative people could simply chain farm them with a t3 and then collapse the hole and farm them again.
I'm advocating increasing c5-c6 simply because they're extremely hard and they should pay something absurd.
(oh and btw between whs and incursions i'll always prefer incursions )
|

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
642
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 14:16:00 -
[240] - Quote
Just Alter wrote:Yeah they're the most dangerous.
However when thinking about these kind of things you have to think like this: "how can something be exploited?".
If c1 and c2 were more lucrative people could simply chain farm them with a t3 and then collapse the hole and farm them again. That's true, plus whilst the challenge in wormholes doesn't really come from the sleepers it does make sense to have at least some link between NPC difficulty and ISK payout.
Even if the only real repercussion of tougher NPCs is that people are forced to risk shinier ships. And boy do I love it when people use shiny ships in WHs The more people flying around j-space in deadspace pinatas the better <3
Just Alter wrote:I'm advocating increasing c5-c6 simply because they're extremely hard and they should pay something absurd Hmm, I'll be honest I mostly do solo stuff (Well, solo as in solo with four characters), so I haven't had much experience in terms of c5/c6 payouts. I was under the impression they were already quite good though?
Just Alter wrote:(oh and btw between whs and incursions i'll always prefer incursions) Really? I got bored of them pretty quickly I find that at least doing exploration or wormholes I have a little variety between sites, and scanning breaks up the monotony of site grinding a little bit.
Still, incursions are more fun than level fours, by christ. I had to run a few level fours to grind my trading alts standings up the other day. Closest I've ever come to biomassing my toons.
--Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK-- |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |