| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder Thundering Herd
550
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:22:00 -
[61] - Quote
Knug LiDi wrote:What I will add to this discussion, is only this:
Yup. And isn't it almost psychotic how they insist that engaging and popping a paper-bag of a Mack is PvP and NOT akin to a suicidal Terrorist Attack ?
These Idiots would blame the World Trade Center Towers for not being tanked with 10 foot Lead Sheets. There isn't anything left for you to do to Carebears. -áGo, kill them some more. They're like fungus or bacteria, they won't die and they won't stop. All you have to show for years of organized harassment campaigns against them is ... nothing. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder Thundering Herd
550
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:23:00 -
[62] - Quote
Roime wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote: One of the oldest fallacies in EVE.
In reality, the majority of the most LAZY PvPers in the game live in/base out of empire space.
wtf?
Fixed for everyone. There isn't anything left for you to do to Carebears. -áGo, kill them some more. They're like fungus or bacteria, they won't die and they won't stop. All you have to show for years of organized harassment campaigns against them is ... nothing. |

Warpshade
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:33:00 -
[63] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: These Idiots would blame the World Trade Center Towers for not being tanked with 10 foot Lead Sheets.
And the Terrorists of 9/11 respawned in their clones, with a lower security status  |

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder Thundering Herd
550
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:42:00 -
[64] - Quote
Warpshade wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: These Idiots would blame the World Trade Center Towers for not being tanked with 10 foot Lead Sheets.
And the Terrorists of 9/11 respawned in their clones, with a lower security status 
Not sure at all how to interpret this.
Try again. There isn't anything left for you to do to Carebears. -áGo, kill them some more. They're like fungus or bacteria, they won't die and they won't stop. All you have to show for years of organized harassment campaigns against them is ... nothing. |

XIRUSPHERE
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
239
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:51:00 -
[65] - Quote
Can I have your alts? I will mine during hulkageddon and turn a profit if you hand them over. You don't need to mine near a hub, you just need to put in a little effort and work with some common sense im sure you have developed over the years. The advantage of a bad memory is that one can enjoy the same good things for the first time several times.
One will rarely err if extreme actions be ascribed to vanity, ordinary actions to habit, and mean actions to fear. |

baltec1
1119
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 14:08:00 -
[66] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Knug LiDi wrote:What I will add to this discussion, is only this:
Yup. And isn't it almost psychotic how they insist that engaging and popping a paper-bag of a Mack is PvP and NOT akin to a suicidal Terrorist Attack ? These Idiots would blame the World Trade Center Towers for not being tanked with 10 foot Lead Sheets.
Its not terrorism its piracy. |

Alotta Cleavage
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 14:21:00 -
[67] - Quote
I understand the OP. Doing the EVE math with Risk vs. Rewards & Only fly what you can afford to lose. I've got a Alt Hulk Miner I just don't see myself using again. Maybe the ORE Syndicate can offer a secondary layer of Insurance for Mining ships? Or some way of forcing down the prices Hulks, I don't know. I seems like with these upcoming changes with Drone Minerals & Reprocessing T1 stuff it seems like something has got to change. |

Serge Bastana
GWA Corp
347
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 14:21:00 -
[68] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Warpshade wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: These Idiots would blame the World Trade Center Towers for not being tanked with 10 foot Lead Sheets.
And the Terrorists of 9/11 respawned in their clones, with a lower security status  Not sure at all how to interpret this. Try again.
After that pathetic attempt I think you should, another game preferably. WoW holds your hand until end game, and gives you a cookie whether you win or lose. EVE not only takes your cookie, but laughs at you for bringing one in the first place... |

Jastra
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
73
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 14:25:00 -
[69] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Jastra wrote:
can you share that fit, seriously if thats non faction then I'll just shut up and go away because if thats true then yeah I agree that may be working as intended
[Hulk, New Setup 1] Mining Laser Upgrade II Damage Control II Small Shield Extender II Invulnerability Field II Survey Scanner II Magnetic Scattering Amplifier II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Mining Drone II x5 Warrior II x5
so in terms of isk at risk from the ganker, what does it take to alpha that fit ?
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3416
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 14:27:00 -
[70] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:Treo... Why is there always someone who doesnt understand PLEX in every thread. Subbing your account with PLEX is literally, 100% exactly the same as paying real money. There are others that buy PLEX, yes, just like there are other people who pay a sub.
It is -exactly- the same in terms of how much you contribute to CCP's wallet. The removal of one PLEXed account would hurt CCP just as much as the removal of one subbed account, and the removal of 10,000 PLEXed accounts would hurt CCP as much as the removal of 10,000 subbed accounts.
You are incorrect. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Hamshoe
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 14:54:00 -
[71] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Knug LiDi wrote:What I will add to this discussion, is only this:
Yup. And isn't it almost psychotic how they insist that engaging and popping a paper-bag of a Mack is PvP and NOT akin to a suicidal Terrorist Attack ? These Idiots would blame the World Trade Center Towers for not being tanked with 10 foot Lead Sheets. Its not terrorism its piracy.
Well since it's a game it's really neither, but within that context anything intended to extract "tears" hardly counts as piracy.
And anyone who claims tear extraction isn't a major motivator for Hulkageddon is lying.
It may be that you're mistaken. |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
307
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 14:55:00 -
[72] - Quote
The best way to go about this OP, is that you have to learn how to turn a negative situation into a positive one. I'm not talking about laughing it off or things like that. I'm talking about taking advantage of the situation.
I have two accounts. One is my Hulk pilot and the other my Orca pilot. To me, this is all I need instead of 4 accounts/alts for mining. Whenever I get ganked at least once, I move out of the system. But before I do, I make sure I place sell orders with ships and mods that gankers and other pvp folks usually use. That way, while I'm away, I'm profiting from their efforts to gank miners who are weaker and less inclined to adapt as other miners do. By the time I get back, my sell orders are complete and I have a fresh system in which the miners there have left and have the belts to myself. It's a double win for me really.
Not only that, I'm always on the move looking to mine in other systems where ganks seem to happen every now and then. The in-game star map or the one Dotlan provide kill stats that are useful in finding suitable systems where I can make a profit. These are the systems I go to whenever I move out of the system I got ganked in recently.
In a sense, I'm actually participating in pvp with minimal loss to myself if I play my cards right. I'm competing against other miners, I'm profiting from the needs of gankers and miners, and I chose to fly into the hot zones.
As you can see, there are many ways to help you turn your situation into a positive one. After all, "adapt or die" is the motto of Eve players. Live by it. Welcome to Eve Online. Don't expect people to be nice to you. |

Lharanai
Empyrean Guard IMPERIAL LEGI0N
139
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 15:33:00 -
[73] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote: It sucks but in the end its just that the game is not for you. Not to say there is anything wrong with not wanting to PvP. But if you don't, its probably not the beeest idea to play :c
I agree with that pvp is hardly avoidable in EVE, but I really have a problem with players telling other players how to play.
The OP was in this game with multiple accounts for 3 years, that means he invested time and money in something he enjoyed. He found his own way to enjoy EVE not including PvP, but that joy is going away so he is leaving.
I am not crying for CCP to make highsec 100% safe, but I am afraid that the OP does not belong to a 0.001 % of EVE players and that the recent ganking behaviour will lead in long term to a significant drop in subs. I hope I am wrong with that prediction, we will see what comes.
Personal note: I am not a big fan of killing other players, my addiction is avoiding getting killed by the hunters....most fun I have recently is playing getting caught....some players really need a lot of time to realize I had warpstabs and more than one....it gives me joy imagining their face when they get me into structure (and yes on these occasions I do hull tanking :) and then I just warp away
Additonal note: as we have hunters (gankers) and prey (miners) in EVE the old fashioned red queen concept still works
"In reference to an evolutionary system, continuing adaptation is needed in order for a species to maintain its relative fitness amongst the systems being co-evolved with"
the gankers improved by the destroyer buff now the miners have to get buffed in order to avoid getting extinct, ahh don't take me to serious on that, I know EVE is not a complete biological system, but correlations do exist :) Touch my **** and I will **** your **** with an rusty **** and **** into your ****, and then I will **** your **** until you ******************** |

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder Thundering Herd
551
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 15:40:00 -
[74] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:
Its not terrorism its piracy.
When you are deliberately going to plan on winding up in a Cargohold-nerfed capsule, it's not Piracy.
Piracy involves financial benefit at the least. There isn't anything left for you to do to Carebears. -áGo, kill them some more. They're like fungus or bacteria, they won't die and they won't stop. All you have to show for years of organized harassment campaigns against them is ... nothing. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder Thundering Herd
551
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 15:42:00 -
[75] - Quote
Serge Bastana wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Warpshade wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: These Idiots would blame the World Trade Center Towers for not being tanked with 10 foot Lead Sheets.
And the Terrorists of 9/11 respawned in their clones, with a lower security status  Not sure at all how to interpret this. Try again. After that pathetic attempt I think you should, another game preferably.
What attempt ? Someone is thread-lost............... There isn't anything left for you to do to Carebears. -áGo, kill them some more. They're like fungus or bacteria, they won't die and they won't stop. All you have to show for years of organized harassment campaigns against them is ... nothing. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6212
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:07:00 -
[76] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:What attempt ? Your failed attempt at a real-life simile.
Lharanai wrote:the gankers improved by the destroyer buff now the miners have to get GǪabsolutely nothing, since the destroyer buff fixed the imbalance caused by the CONCORD buffs and the insurance nerfs. The only difference is that the gankers chose to adapt; the miners refuse to do the same (and they also refuse to acknowledge the fact that they already had their buffsGǪ numerous times).
The simple fact remains: a Hulk can trivially survive an attack from something as small as destroyer; it can be made to survive an attack from something as large as a battleship. People just refuse to protect themselves because, like complete idiots, they think that losing several hundred millions worth of equipment doesn't effect their efficiency. The OP died because he consistently made every mistake in the book. Ganking is a complete non-issue. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Lharanai
Empyrean Guard IMPERIAL LEGI0N
140
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:15:00 -
[77] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:What attempt ? Your failed attempt at a real-life simile. Lharanai wrote:the gankers improved by the destroyer buff now the miners have to get GǪabsolutely nothing, since the destroyer buff fixed the imbalance caused by the CONCORD buffs and the insurance nerfs. The only difference is that the gankers chose to adapt; the miners refuse to do the same (and they also refuse to acknowledge the fact that they already had their buffsGǪ numerous times).
there is a slight difference between changing you habit or your fit in order to adapt and a change of ship stats by a buff.
facts:
the pure statistical DPS output of cheaper ships has improved (via Tier 3 BC and destroyer buff) the stats of industrial ships did not improve
Edit: just to make it clear, I am not a miner, I hate mining, its the most boring thing you can do in EVE in my opinion, but some people like it and who am I to judge them Touch my **** and I will **** your **** with an rusty **** and **** into your ****, and then I will **** your **** until you ******************** |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6212
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:19:00 -
[78] - Quote
Lharanai wrote:there is a slight difference between changing you habit or your fit in order to adapt and a change of ship stats by a buff.
facts:
the pure statistical DPS output of cheaper ships has improved (via Tier 3 BC and destroyer buff) the stats of industrial ships did not improve GǪbecause all that happened is that the balance was returned to where it was 3-4 years ago (when ganking wasn't a problem and when miners could work the belts very safely). So no stat buff is necessary since the situation is already balanced just fine.
So no, it does not follow that miners GÇ£have toGÇ¥ be buffed just because destroyers were buffed an R3 BCs were introduced. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

baltec1
1119
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:25:00 -
[79] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
When you are deliberately going to plan on winding up in a Cargohold-nerfed capsule, it's not Piracy.
Piracy involves financial benefit at the least.
They do it for money. You can make a profit from killing a hulk with a destroyer. |

Lharanai
Empyrean Guard IMPERIAL LEGI0N
140
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:26:00 -
[80] - Quote
you have your opinion and I have mine, hopefully I am wrong and you are right because atm I can't see EVE in a healthy state regarding the satisfaction of the majority of players
but to end with a quote I really like and which should be more considered in the forums:
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. ~Evelyn Beatrice Hall
Edit: and with satisfaction I mean longterm not until the next expansion Touch my **** and I will **** your **** with an rusty **** and **** into your ****, and then I will **** your **** until you ******************** |

baltec1
1119
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:28:00 -
[81] - Quote
Lharanai wrote:[quote=Kietay Ayari]
I am not crying for CCP to make highsec 100% safe, but I am afraid that the OP does not belong to a 0.001 % of EVE players and that the recent ganking behaviour will lead in long term to a significant drop in subs. I hope I am wrong with that prediction, we will see what comes.
This "recent ganking behaviour has been in game for the past 9 years. Its just as bad now as any time so I doubt we will see a drop in subs over this. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6212
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:28:00 -
[82] - Quote
Lharanai wrote:just to make it clear, I am not a miner, I hate mining, its the most boring thing you can do in EVE in my opinion, but some people like it and who am I to judge them Well, you can look at their demands; notice that they can already do exactly what they demand that they should be able to do, but that they refuse to do so; and judge them as being very very silly people because of this sharp disconnect between their demands and the reality of the situation.
The judging has nothing to do with their being miners GÇö it has to do with their absolute, unrelenting, and unreasonable refusal to make use of what's available to them to solve their own problems. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Severe Pain
Never Ask Why
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:51:00 -
[83] - Quote
I have a solution which will make all miners superduper happy...Lets call it MSpace.
Mspace have set of rules:
- You can enter and leave from Mspace only with your pod - You can only use mining ships in MSpace - You can only mine Carebearilium in MSpace - You can only build mining ships from Carebearilium
So there, I fixed it for you :) Own economy and peeps can mine 24/7 without worrying about anything
But seriously that is what some guys seems to be wanting.
There are many threads like this one and they all have good solutions in them. Good anti-gank fittings, advices and tactics. But sadly many of the characters think that whining is best way to shield themselves.
Severe Pain -- The Friendly Neighborhood Ganker
|

Hatt0ri Hanz0
Life sucks then you die Ltd.
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 17:07:00 -
[84] - Quote
seany1212 wrote:You wouldn't go into a mission or pvp without a tank, why do miners think they are an exception? AND then result in crying their eyes out on the forum about it?! Miners should be tanking against the world instead of thinking the world is risk free. For the OP who is 'quitting' as mining is potentially about to become the most valuable profession in the game depending how the market goes then EVE or even any other game is clearly not for you 
Read the post above you. Yes, it's possible to tank a hulk. Sure some people choose to not do it. And I'm fine with them losing their ships to superior firepower. But the T1 barges, can't be tanked to even a minimal degree. It takes literally next to nothing to blow away a T1 barge. To me, that shows that there is something wrong with the equation. Mining barges, are not pvp vessels, and cannot be fitted to tank as such, yet they are on the receiving end of alot of 'pvp'. They need their tanks buffed.
|

seany1212
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
140
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 17:52:00 -
[85] - Quote
Hatt0ri Hanz0 wrote:seany1212 wrote:You wouldn't go into a mission or pvp without a tank, why do miners think they are an exception? AND then result in crying their eyes out on the forum about it?! Miners should be tanking against the world instead of thinking the world is risk free. For the OP who is 'quitting' as mining is potentially about to become the most valuable profession in the game depending how the market goes then EVE or even any other game is clearly not for you  Read the post above you. Yes, it's possible to tank a hulk. Sure some people choose to not do it. And I'm fine with them losing their ships to superior firepower. But the T1 barges, can't be tanked to even a minimal degree. It takes literally next to nothing to blow away a T1 barge. To me, that shows that there is something wrong with the equation. Mining barges, are not pvp vessels, and cannot be fitted to tank as such, yet they are on the receiving end of alot of 'pvp'. They need their tanks buffed.
SOME people choose not to do it?! this is the killboard from hulkageddon 4 last year: http://hulkageddon4.machine9.net/killboard/?a=home&m=2&y=2011
I'll give 25mill isk to a person who finds a damage control 2 on a hulk  |

Lharanai
Empyrean Guard IMPERIAL LEGI0N
143
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 18:22:00 -
[86] - Quote
not a t2 but at least not meta 0
http://hulkageddon4.machine9.net/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=5232
what do get :)
Touch my **** and I will **** your **** with an rusty **** and **** into your ****, and then I will **** your **** until you ******************** |

Hatt0ri Hanz0
Life sucks then you die Ltd.
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 18:25:00 -
[87] - Quote
seany1212 wrote:Hatt0ri Hanz0 wrote:seany1212 wrote:You wouldn't go into a mission or pvp without a tank, why do miners think they are an exception? AND then result in crying their eyes out on the forum about it?! Miners should be tanking against the world instead of thinking the world is risk free. For the OP who is 'quitting' as mining is potentially about to become the most valuable profession in the game depending how the market goes then EVE or even any other game is clearly not for you  Read the post above you. Yes, it's possible to tank a hulk. Sure some people choose to not do it. And I'm fine with them losing their ships to superior firepower. But the T1 barges, can't be tanked to even a minimal degree. It takes literally next to nothing to blow away a T1 barge. To me, that shows that there is something wrong with the equation. Mining barges, are not pvp vessels, and cannot be fitted to tank as such, yet they are on the receiving end of alot of 'pvp'. They need their tanks buffed. SOME people choose not to do it?! this is the killboard from hulkageddon 4 last year: http://hulkageddon4.machine9.net/killboard/?a=home&m=2&y=2011I'll give 25mill isk to a person who finds a damage control 2 on a hulk 
And as I said, those people, who choose to woefully undertank (no tank) their hulk, probably deserve to lose it, you'll get no argument from me on that. I personally think the hulk needs a minor buff, to help fit a slightly better tank, but if people won't tank it now, I'm not sure they will with a slight buff in fitting. My issue is with the other barges, that don't have the same tank as the hulk. I'm not saying they should have an equal tank, but really they are pathetic in comparison.
|

Treo 'Ssard
Hangar 55
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 18:58:00 -
[88] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:Treo... Why is there always someone who doesnt understand PLEX in every thread. Subbing your account with PLEX is literally, 100% exactly the same as paying real money. There are others that buy PLEX, yes, just like there are other people who pay a sub.
It is -exactly- the same in terms of how much you contribute to CCP's wallet. The removal of one PLEXed account would hurt CCP just as much as the removal of one subbed account, and the removal of 10,000 PLEXed accounts would hurt CCP as much as the removal of 10,000 subbed accounts.
You're absolutely right: for every PLEX that the OP purchases with ISK, someone else has paid for it with real money. I get that. But it seems to me that, by the time OP comes around to purchase PLEX, the money is already in CCP's pocket, and you said it yourself: there are others besides the OP that purchase PLEX. If he doesn't buy it, someone else will. But I could be mistaken; after all, I DON'T have an "e-degree from University of Phoenix" (or any other degree / formal training with regards to finances or economy). I'm just musing out loud here..
What irked me is that the OP seems to want to have the game adapted to his play preference, rather than adapting his play preference to the reality of the game. I personally love the fact that I can get blown to pieces, even in high-sec; it's never a pleasant situation, but it forces me to adapt and try to outwit those who would blow me to pieces. It's a part of what makes it exciting, that gives it that "rush", so to speak.
By threatening to financially "punish" CPP, the OP comes off (to me, anyways) like those customers you see in stores / restaurants: those who throw tantrums and threaten to take their business away if they don't get their way.
While every account is ultimately paid for by money, whether PLEX-ed or sub-ed, I still believe that him not renewing his 4 alts will not cause great woe to CCP's finances - at least, not as much as he seems to believe. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1559
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 19:18:00 -
[89] - Quote
Any fittings buff that might potentially come about for Exhumers would inevitably be used to boost their mining output instead, and the pleas to be made "less vulnerable" would continue unabated.
Hulks are tankable.
Other exhumers are cheap enough to be considered expendable.
All of them are capable of simply not being there to be ganked if their pilot is situationally aware... and that is really the main goal of an industrial ship in any potentially dangerous area, to not be there when when the reaper comes for you.
Always fit and pilot your ship according to the situations you are likely to encounter. If you feel safe in the area you mine in, fit for maximum yield, if not then fit to tank or evade and fly accordingly. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

seany1212
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
140
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 19:20:00 -
[90] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Any fittings buff that might potentially come about for Exhumers would inevitably be used to boost their mining output instead, and the pleas to be made "less vulnerable" would continue unabated.
Hulks are tankable.
Other exhumers are cheap enough to be considered expendable.
All of them are capable of simply not being there to be ganked if their pilot is situationally aware... and that is really the main goal of an industrial ship in any potentially dangerous area, to not be there when when the reaper comes for you.
Always fit and pilot your ship according to the situations you are likely to encounter. If you feel safe in the area you mine in, fit for maximum yield, if not then fit to tank or evade and fly accordingly.
/thread 
EDIT: Lharanai, ISK sent you sleuthy person  |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |