| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. T3- four months left... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Captain Bringdown I wonder, the presentation also showed ships with 2~3 parts ;p what if it was actually 5^5+5^4+5^3+5^2 possible combinations per race? This would amount to 3900 possible combinations I remember hear...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.12.02 22:13:00
|
2. Making FW actually give money - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The sad thing is that all these suggestions were made as soon as FW was sprung onto the players on the test server, and have been continued as long as FW has been in exisitance while the only change to FW was to make ranks harder to obtain (really...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.12.02 21:47:00
|
3. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
was there any thought put into calling out the falcon/rook from the other recons in the points allocated (or for that matter addressing the EAFs in a similiar manner). I can see why the ECM ships are almost a 50% premium to a HAC/BC but the other ...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.12.02 21:02:00
|
4. Current Game Mechanic Exploit -10 sec pirates plundering in empire. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCp is going to have to do something on this. They learned their lesson when they took too long to react to the Jihadswarm, killing miners (even macros) costs them subscriptions. Insurance mechanisms are to blame here, might be a good time to sca...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.12.02 16:48:00
|
5. Aurora gone ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Atropos What ingame tools would you be interested in? A PVP tournament tool would be very useful. If it could enforce rules that most of the alliance tournaments run under (control points for ships/ship classes, allo...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.12.01 18:19:00
|
6. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Will this tournament use a beta version of a "tournament tool" that I have heard mentioned as being on the development path?
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.12.01 18:12:00
|
7. Give all AFs 1 more slot. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Cade Morrigan Poor HAWK needs more than just another slot :( I find that the hawk is better than many of the exisitng AFs (enyo, retribution, vengenance) when fitted with an active tank. Heck I lost an arbi to a hawk, th...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.26 21:12:00
|
8. Add stacking penalties to ECM - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Eluhaf on 26/11/2008 21:04:18 the Falcon is the only cloaky recon that is worth anything in a gang above 5 ships these days. The nerf to web strengths took the rapier off the list, as its really only useful in situations where you a...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.26 21:02:00
|
9. Fixing lowsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I really hope that CCP is listening to the constant stream of resquests to bring back meaningful pursuits for small corporations. There seems to be an ever growing divide between the solo mission runner/industiralist and the mega alliance/NAP fes...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.23 22:13:00
|
10. Removing Ice from Empire - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sally Bestonge Originally by: Eluhaf I fully support this suggestion. Or as an alternative could make it so that ice materials couldn't be jumped by any means (bridge, carrier, jump freighter, titan bridge, etc). T...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.17 20:50:00
|
11. Ishkur QU - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Eluhaf on 17/11/2008 20:23:32 Originally by: Alex Harumichi Edited by: Alex Harumichi on 17/11/2008 11:33:03 Originally by: Furb Killer Normal ishkur blaster setup: [Ishkur, blaster] 1MN Afterburner II Yeah,...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.17 20:22:00
|
12. Removing Ice from Empire - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I fully support this suggestion. Or as an alternative could make it so that ice materials couldn't be jumped by any means (bridge, carrier, jump freighter, titan bridge, etc). The benefits of 0.0 should come with the difficulties of operating on...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.17 19:49:00
|
13. Stuff, we're going to have it: lowsec policing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You Should get a sec status increase for killing low sec status pirates. Not anything huge, but similiar to ratting the same ships (ie, +.2 for a BS, .01 for a frig). If you scale for ship size and pirates sec status then you would get a system th...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.17 18:22:00
|
14. Boost AF - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Reports of afterburner fit AF invincibility to Medium Drones are greatly exaggerated.
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.15 05:39:00
|
15. Why 0.0 isnt feasible to me. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Esmenet 0.0 logistics is in fact way too easy. 2nd that, easy 0.0 logisitics gives rise to the mega (body count) alliances and mind numbing 0.0 blob ops.
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.15 02:51:00
|
16. Ballistic Control Units... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I am still waiting for my mid slot missile EW option, or script for a tracking disruptor.
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.13 21:19:00
|
17. 30 day cards price being fixed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Plim Trading of GTC on the ingame market will raise prices, that is pretty obvious. Only if you believe that supply is lower than demand. Look at how many threads were in the GTC forums whining about price fixing with fa...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.12 01:38:00
|
18. 30 day cards price being fixed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well if oog gold farmers are selling 1B isk for $30, then a GTC should raise to 15-30% under that level. That would place the 60d GTC at around 900M, or a 30day to 450M. CCP controls the ratio of legit versus illegal farmer prices. So unless CCP...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.12 01:20:00
|
19. Faction Warfare Info at Fanfest - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So it sounds like they think density is the problem. Probably will help a little but they are mising the boat so much that I wonder if they even play the game or just read their press releases. To get FW to be anything at meaningful they need to:...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.11 00:24:00
|
20. t3 ships @ fanfest - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I have to imagine that each section of the ship would give a different bonus, and have a related PG/CPU and mass. That way you can pick the bonuses that you want and not fly ship where you are only using 2 of the 4 bonuses available. Question is...
- by Eluhaf - at 2008.11.08 16:42:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |