Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
41. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Obil Que wrote: Timezone mechanics need careful consideration as well to ensure they do not devolve into station sitting for smaller corps making their "primetime" too tedious to endure. I think that somewhere one of the Devs said that they w...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.19 20:51:53
|
42. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
thowlimer wrote: Refunding ISK would actually be worse than refunding minerals, refunding minerals would just move already existing ISK around while refunding isk would create huge amounts of ISK out of thin air. I don't agree. Items were ISK,...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.19 14:42:40
|
43. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: mufasa73 wrote: Really, all these sov changes are, imho, pretty much this Ouch - But pretty accurate. FozzieSov, in a nutshell Translation: Iterative design is a lie. If I can find "potential flaws" in the system, ...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.19 04:16:08
|
44. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The first or second Dev blog said they would old and new POSs would coexist for an unspecified amount of transition time. My preference would be for CCP to have an equivalency matrix for POS items and let you right-click convert them. Something ...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.18 23:58:58
|
45. [Carnyx] Station Services Entosis Combat Testing - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I did some testing this weekend, not sure if there's been an update today... T1 Entosis Link I went out of locking range in an Inty, to about 45 km from station, and then came back in range and locked. Once locked, the Link showed as still attacki...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.18 18:14:11
|
46. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote: As far as medium structures are concerned including any kind of sov 'capture the nodes' mechanism will mean they cannot be used by solo/small group corps. There is very little chance such a group could capture multipl...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.15 22:20:56
|
47. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Fredric Wolf wrote: ... if you are killed in that (WH) system (you should) spawn in your citadel on these, but if you are in another it would default back to your birth station. So let me get this straight... Your ideas have been shown to be ...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.15 19:25:51
|
48. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I'm still curious as to how they are going to explain why node capture mechanics are needed in game. It'd be nice to get a blurb like: Quote: Scope New Network: "New Eden's Engineers have discovered that the recently invented Entosis Link is ...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.15 19:06:32
|
49. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Fredric Wolf wrote: Here are my thoughts on WH they were supposed to be tough to live in but also offered the best rewards for time/isk. With these changes I do not think it is going to be half as bad as people are making it out to be. Why shou...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.15 17:52:44
|
50. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ocean Ormand wrote: CCP frequently throws a lot of time/money at an issue and comes up with something that is not what the players want and is just unfun. CQ, minigame/spew, and industry teams are recent examples. The industry teams were so bad...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.15 17:48:26
|
51. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Soldarius wrote: Any reason w cannot reuse the current POS weaponry? So rather than having to come up with entirely new stuff as well as scrapping the old stuff, just convert them to fitted weapons? They've said there is currently more variet...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.15 14:25:58
|
52. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Orm Magnustat wrote: Fzhal wrote: Orm Magnustat wrote: worst of all: the "asset safety" some genius came up with when my POS/structure gets blown up ... seriously devs, have you totally lost it ?? This goes against the core fundamental...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.14 20:00:49
|
53. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The whole Entosis thing isn't necessarily broken, but instead it is the "Can't receive assistance" part that actually creates the problem. It makes the equation very simple if Citadel has guns (automated or not): If one ship can solo tank the ...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.14 18:50:51
|
54. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Obil Que wrote: It's a pretty simple calculation to beat your defenses to do a solo unattended attack. So what good are they then? That is what I said 300 posts ago...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.14 18:17:58
|
55. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote: Romel Erata wrote: Not sure if anyone has brought this up yet but does this mean I can set essentially a stationary pipe-bomb with an XL Citadel and a bubble? Dat is a good point. "Oh sorry, our new-POS-system-d...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.14 16:11:49
|
56. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Orm Magnustat wrote: adding some personal notes on general details: the whole "vulnerability window" concept is artificial and superflous bullshit, a misconception born from the dillema of on the one hand wanting to lower the attack thre...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.14 03:57:49
|
57. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
thebringer wrote: CCP Ytterbium wrote: Lyron-Baktos wrote: When do we get some news on these new structures and how or if they will interact in wormhole space? We want most of those structures to be available in W-space, but with some ...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.12 22:57:50
|
58. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lurifax wrote: Why do you want the XL Citadel if you still need to go capture the nodes 2-3 times? It still only takes one time were the intosis modil manages to hit the station or does takes 2-3 times with entosis links and nodes ? why put al...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.12 21:32:53
|
59. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alternative names for the Invulnerability Field: Asylum Field noun 1.an institution for the maintenance and care of the mentally ill, orphans, or other persons requiring specialized assistance. 2.an inviolable refuge, as formerly for criminals an...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.12 19:32:14
|
60. Sticky:Dev Blog: Shake my Citadel - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alundil wrote: CCP Ytterbium wrote: Scott Ormands wrote: 3. Will the office, cloning, and market functions work in WH space. What we are thinking so far is to have high-sec and W-space have higher indices that null-sec by default...
- by Fzhal - at 2015.05.12 19:00:19
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |