Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 |
81. I have a dream... of equal resistances - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 08/11/2007 00:55:43 Though I agree with your intention of improving EM as a damage type I find myself disagreeing in the details. Specifically the Caldari T2 shield resist entry: 0/80/70/60 becoming 0/85/70/40. 5% extr...
- by Incantare - at 2007.11.08 00:51:00
|
82. Petiton "Don't nerf Myrmidons" - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Sign all you want, you're not stopping the nerf bat.
- by Incantare - at 2007.11.07 17:03:00
|
83. Helllooooo? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Uh huh.
- by Incantare - at 2007.11.07 04:54:00
|
84. New torps - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Apoc has 7 lows. But anyway the Raven has only 6 mids.
- by Incantare - at 2007.11.05 16:34:00
|
85. Shield Boosters buffed - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Why am I not surprised.
- by Incantare - at 2007.11.05 08:07:00
|
86. Crippling the Gallenteans - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Stakhanov That's the gallente nerf. It hits the Gallente recons hard, but it wrecks damp setups on all other races' ships. Damp curse, damp rapier/huggin, damp raven/caracal/drake etc. are all getting hit.
- by Incantare - at 2007.11.05 05:09:00
|
87. Dual Racial Skilled Battleships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Read again, there are no Gallente/Amarr and Minmatar/Caldari factions. I agree that this would be a very nice addition to the game.
- by Incantare - at 2007.11.05 03:59:00
|
88. Shield Boosters buffed - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I have a hard time believing this, and can't log into sisi. Can anyone confirm?
- by Incantare - at 2007.11.03 21:01:00
|
89. [BALANCE in eve?] where is cloaker fix? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Cloaks are fine.
- by Incantare - at 2007.11.02 21:13:00
|
90. New Kronos bandwith - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Xao Wen The bandwith has been reduced to 75 MB. "Yay, but it's to bring it inline DPS wise". False. (...) True. No other marauder got a dps boost over its t1 counterpart, except the Paladin which badly needed it. The K...
- by Incantare - at 2007.11.02 17:04:00
|
91. Battleships != Bumper Cars - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Battleships are obviously overpowered. This is not a role they were ever designed to fill. I suggest a two part solution: -Battleships will no longer be able to fit rigs -Battleships will be limited to two high slots alone, but can assign thei...
- by Incantare - at 2007.10.31 23:48:00
|
92. Kill the Turtles... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Stop doing "tests" on sisi. On tq when you run into a passive tank you cannot break solo you call for a ganksquad in corp chat and wait while tanking pathetic dps from the immobile passive ship. A passive tank gives up everything towards tank, in...
- by Incantare - at 2007.10.29 19:08:00
|
93. DRAKE NERF EXTREMELY BAD PASSIVE TANKERS READ - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Have you taken a long break off eve? Because passive tanks were nerfed a while ago, both the cpu usage of sprs and BC recharge time were increased.
- by Incantare - at 2007.10.29 06:35:00
|
94. Targeting delay - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
That's good to hear, especially for the black ops, from reading the bonus I didn't find it clear. I haven't even looked at bombs to be honest, they've come out pre-nerfed and overly expensive to be worth anything.
- by Incantare - at 2007.10.29 06:32:00
|
95. Targeting delay - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The bonus on the new black ops reads "No targeting delay when using cloaking devices" does this only mean only no recalibration time, or does it also mean no signature resolution penalty from fitting a cloak? As an additional question, do stealth...
- by Incantare - at 2007.10.29 06:22:00
|
96. Targeting delay - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The bonus on the new black ops reads "No targeting delay when using cloaking devices" does this only mean only no recalibration time, or does it also mean no signature resolution penalty from fitting a cloak? As an additional question, do stealth...
- by Incantare - at 2007.10.29 06:22:00
|
97. Why the Paladin web bonus is terrible. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mr Friendly Except it can't use long range guns yet, so it's forced to use 425 ac's and always fight in falloff. So, no need for useless bonuses when your guns can't hit for crap ;) That's true, its powergrid could u...
- by Incantare - at 2007.10.29 05:36:00
|
98. Tracking links being watered down? Bonus being buffed? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Nice. I'm looking forward to setting up a logistics Abaddon team and sniping with multifreq.
- by Incantare - at 2007.10.29 04:48:00
|
99. Why the Paladin web bonus is terrible. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The new torps won't be great for missions due to their new range, and for cruise the painter doesn't contribute much. In PvP they'll be great, but a painting bonus on a shield tanked BS is terrible. I'd rather pay a noob to follow me around paint...
- by Incantare - at 2007.10.29 04:46:00
|
100. Torp nerf/boost?? Im not sure which it is. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It's both really. Overall for PvP I consider it a boost because the extra range on torps wasn't all that useful due to their low velocity and the extra damage very welcome. That said I do not share the alarmism of gallente pilots. "OMFG it can m...
- by Incantare - at 2007.10.28 04:03:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |