| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
81. CCP SERVER ENGINEERS ARE IN TEST - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Phantom wrote: It is extremely unfortunate to make such a mistake and we apologize deeply for disrupting one of the truly epic battles in the history of EVE; especially since this battle already raged on for several hours and was still hea...
- by Innominate - at 2013.07.04 23:10:00
|
82. so what can you do with the ssoToken param of the exefile.exe ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GreenSeed wrote: ITT we are concerned about a security hole that either requires local access to be exploited or requires the system to be already compromised. Saving passwords also requires local access or a compromised system to be exploit...
- by Innominate - at 2013.05.22 02:09:00
|
83. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Peligro wrote: Innominate wrote: Tippia wrote: Remeber the EVE-Uni market bot that got someone banned a while back? People tried to defend that on the grounds that it was Gǣonly cache scrapingGǥ. This change puts a solid slug thro...
- by Innominate - at 2013.04.18 18:49:00
|
84. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Desparo wrote: We are all at risk of being banned at and time at your whim for using something like EVEMon that for what 8 years? To be entirely fair, the particular feature at question in evemon is relatively recent.
- by Innominate - at 2013.04.18 18:45:00
|
85. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Remeber the EVE-Uni market bot that got someone banned a while back? People tried to defend that on the grounds that it was Gǣonly cache scrapingGǥ. This change puts a solid slug through both knees of that argument. Except ...
- by Innominate - at 2013.04.18 18:17:00
|
86. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Peligro wrote: In the meantime, CCP confirms that we will only impose penalties on cache scraping if used in connection with other illegal activities in the game (i.e., botting). We will not take action against cache scraping for other use...
- by Innominate - at 2013.04.18 18:12:00
|
87. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Stillman wrote: But I also don't want the misconception that has been, admittedly as a result of a mistake on our end, believed to be allowed by the EULA. You are wrong. The existing interpretation prior to this dev blog has been that it...
- by Innominate - at 2013.04.18 17:02:00
|
88. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ambassador Crane wrote: Hopefully none, but common sense seems to be fairly absent in this thread.... I think most of the players have a pretty solid common sense grasp of what is acceptable and what is crossing the line. CCP however have ...
- by Innominate - at 2013.04.18 16:20:00
|
89. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Peligro wrote: We are looking for cheaters, hackers, botters and the likes. We are not looking for EVEMON users. Basically, please don't worry. And in the process you have declared evemon a bannable utility. Is this a guarantee that eve...
- by Innominate - at 2013.04.18 15:47:00
|
90. POSes: I am a small portion of the community - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
CCP Gargant wrote: "Seagull: The reason there's a GǣnoGǥ to doing [Modular POSes] right now is that it was affecting all of these areas in a way that was too big to do at once. ... Nowhere has CCP stated that the Player Owned Structure ...
- by Innominate - at 2013.01.18 01:28:00
|
91. POSes: I am a small portion of the community - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I'm going to go ahead and disagree with a lot of the people talking about POS. In its current state POS management really does affect very few players. This is because they are broken and awful that very few people can tolerate dealing with them o...
- by Innominate - at 2013.01.17 15:39:00
|
92. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Don't these skill changes kinda screw new players at the same time as giving older players a huge pile of free skill training? This seems backwards to me.
- by Innominate - at 2012.11.06 15:13:00
|
93. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Tracking/Range Mods and Ewar Tracking mod and disruptor changes moved out of this release until the first set of changes settles a bit In other words, "Tracking mod and disruptor changes have been moved to the back bu...
- by Innominate - at 2012.10.01 19:38:00
|
94. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
These ships are underwhelming and I'm not sure why anyone would use any of them.
- by Innominate - at 2012.09.28 19:05:00
|
95. EVE Causing Periodic nVidia driver crashes / recoveries? - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Elise Randolph wrote: I'm having the same problem, but only when multiboxing and only when there are 200+ on grid. I'm using the 301.42 drivers and am/was having this exact problem, and specifically only having it in large fights. SOMETHING...
- by Innominate - at 2012.07.14 16:25:00
|
96. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kieron VonDeux wrote: But hopfully once CCP gets a grasp on the situation, they will realize that that is in fact the problem. That is one thing that is keeping so many people out of Nullsec. Reducing the range of influence of the larger org...
- by Innominate - at 2012.06.20 18:35:00
|
97. CCP needs to take a hard look at Goonswarm and Hulkageddon to save EVE. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: The end result is: CFC as only ruler in 0.0, dictating the markets in prominent commodities. 2 will live in 0.0 or hi sec and will have only the newbies left to kill. Soon the CFC will control all of 0.0 Soon the DRF ...
- by Innominate - at 2012.05.31 12:10:00
|
98. MASS EXODUS from EvE. CCP must listen. LET YOUR ACCOUNT EXPIRE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Packert wrote: Since CCP doesnot seem to control EVE in game it would seem the only alternative to stay in game is to join GS or unsub from game. While many people quit when they realize EVE isn't WoW-in-space, more join for exactly the sam...
- by Innominate - at 2012.05.30 02:28:00
|
99. The End of All Things Goon - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I have a mittani corpse I'd be willing to sell.
- by Innominate - at 2012.05.07 03:35:00
|
100. [Proposal] CSM Member Real Life Names - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Aylleen wrote: But those who have great privileges should also have great responsibility. You can't commit not even ONE illegal act. You cannot break the laws of your host country by inciting people to harass your enemy until he suicides. . ...
- by Innominate - at 2012.03.31 19:15:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |